Professional Documents
Culture Documents
1. Community-at-large:
a. often dictates the purposes, goals, and
content of school curricula;
b. recommend direction and changes in
the curriculum (e.g. professional groups,
civic groups, business and
industry)
2. Law-makers/government officials:
a. authorize school budget;
b. enact legislation to effect
curriculum change or
improvement;
c. issue guidelines in designing and
implementing curriculum
proposals
3. Governing/school boards:
a. either make important decision on, or
oversee/manage school operation;
b. conduct public hearings to either
inform or solicit information on
curriculum matters;
c. authorize school expenditure for
curriculum development,
implementation and evaluation as needed in
the distinct or school; consider and
adopt .
4. Parents/Guardians:
a. support and participate in parent-school
organizations where priorities for
the curriculum are often set
(instructional
materials, learning experiences to
provide etc.)
5. Publishers:
a. support development of instructional
materials based on the curriculum
developed;
b. helped in the implementation of
curriculum
6. Teachers:
a. establish direction and implementation
of a particular program; select content to
be emphasized;
b. help prepared the scope and sequence
of a program;
c. attend to pedagogical concerns such
that they may modify the curriculum to
suit the needs of the learners;
d. help in evaluating the effectiveness of
curriculum
7. Learners:
a. the primary stakeholders of the
curriculum, whose needs and
abilities are the basis of
curriculum content selection and
b. whose achievement level measure
the effectiveness of the
curriculum
Approaches to Curriculum
Development
Technical approach
– Considered as the traditional way of developing
curricula; which heavily relies on curriculum
knowledge from non-teachers; not concerned
about the context in which it will be used
– Use these procedures:
• A committee of non-teaching staff
(administrators curriculum, specialists and
consultants, and sometimes, teachers and
community members) develops or revises a
curriculum, and decides what the intended
learning outcomes should be
• Teachers implement the curriculum in their
teaching situation, assuming major
responsibilities in school-based approaches to
attain learning outcomes
• Observable evidence is gathered during
instruction and the results of this become the
basis for potential changes
– In this approach, curriculum functions are
separated, but related to, instructional functions
– Curriculum processes are rational and
systematic
Non-Technical Approach
• Relies heavily on teachers as the major
source of curriculum knowledge because
they know their students and teaching
contexts
• Curricula using this approach do not
initially have intended learning outcomes
because what students are expected to
learn is not easily predicted
• Teachers in this approach enact, rather
than implement, the curriculum, which
means that the teachers are involved in
both development of curriculum and
fitting the curriculum to specific
context
• Follows these procedures:
– Planner-teacher identifies a general area
for study
– Teachers gives the initial shared
experience and the teachers, and
provides additional input and closure
• Shows the curriculum functions are not
easily distinguishable from instructional
function
Most Influential Models of Curriculum
Development
1. Hilda Taba’s Inverted Model of
Curriculum
Development includes the following steps:
1. Diagnosing Needs
2. Formulating specific objectives
3. Selecting content
4. Organizing content
5. Selecting and Organizing activities
6. Evaluating lessons and units
2. Ralph Tyler’s End- Means Model
which follows these steps:
Determining the school’s and teacher’s
philosophy
Identifying educational purposes
Selecting and organizing content
Evaluation
Tyler suggest that all curriculum
development phases must consider three
important elements:
1. learners
2. society
3. subject matter
Linking Curriculum with instruction
Reteach
Remediate or Evaluation
reinforce?
Move to next lesson
Wiles and Bondi’s Model
-review of curriculum
guide
-judge success of -state/select -Assess student
strategies objective ability
-make planning -organize content by -determine
adjustments time relevance
-Match outcomes to 1. -revise objective if
expectations needed
–Situation Analysis
»Points to the need to examine the nature of
the situation, or learning context, to justify
the selection of objectives and learning
experiences
Curriculum Organization and Design
Curriculum Improvement
Refers to alteration of certain aspects of
curriculum without changing the fundamental
curriculum elements/ structures/ conception
Involves five levels of operation:
1.substitution (new series in place of current series);
2. alteration (additional instructional time for a
subject);
3.variation (adopting other school’s programs);
4.restructuring (organize teams of subjects
specialists, teachers and aids);
5.value orientation (some instructional routine
matters made part of computer-assisted instruction)
Curriculum changes
Refers to the basic alliteration in the structure
and design of learning experiences based on
new conceptions, which may be at the school,
district or national level
Involves the following tasks:
1. Identification of a particular need to change;
may be based on evaluation
results, or initiative from concerned
individuals or groups
2. study of alternative and proposals for change
3. selection of proposed change (either one subject only or
in one school only)
4. Pilot study design (try out)
5. Appraisal of data from pilot study, and the corresponding,
necessary modification if any
6. Continuous study by concerned staff through adequate in
service activities and help of any consultant
7. decision to adapt, adopt or reject
8. integration into school system
Understanding by Design
Wiggins and McTighe