Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Successfully Launching
New Ventures, 1/e
Bruce R. Barringer
R. Duane Ireland
Chapter 8
8-1
©2006 Prentice Hall
Chapter Objectives
(1 of 2)
Ethically departing a
Choosing a lawyer
former employer
8-4
©2006 Prentice Hall
Ethically Departing a Former Employer
(1 of 2)
8-5
©2006 Prentice Hall
Ethically Departing a Former Employer
(2 of 2)
8-6
©2006 Prentice Hall
Drafting a Founders’ Agreement
(1 of 1)
• Founders’ Agreement
– A founders’ agreement (or shareholders’ agreement) is a
written document that deals with issues such as the relative
split of the equity among the founders of the firm, how
individual founders will be compensated for the cash or the
“sweat equity” they put into the firm, and how long the
founders will have to remain with the firm for their shares
to fully vest.
– The items to include in the founders agreement are shown
on the following slide.
8-7
©2006 Prentice Hall
Avoiding Legal Disputes
8-8
©2006 Prentice Hall
Promoting Business Ethics
(1 of 3)
8-9
©2006 Prentice Hall
Promoting Business Ethics
(2 of 3)
Most common types of ethical problems to guard against
8-10
©2006 Prentice Hall
Promoting Business Ethics
(3 of 3)
Most common types of ethical problems to guard against (continued)
8-11
©2006 Prentice Hall
Choosing a Form of Business Ownership
When a business is launched, a form of legal entity must be chosen.
The most common legal entities are…
Limited Liability
Corporation
Company
8-12
©2006 Prentice Hall
Issues to Consider in Choosing a Legal
Form of Business Ownership
• The cost of setting up and maintaining the legal form
of ownership.
• The extent to which an entrepreneur can shield his or
her personal assets from the liabilities of the business.
• Tax considerations
• The ease of raising capital
8-13
©2006 Prentice Hall
Sole Proprietorship
(1 of 2)
• Sole Proprietorship
– The simplest form of business entity is the sole
proprietorship.
– A sole proprietorship is a form of business organization
involving one person, and the person and the business are
essentially the same.
– A sole proprietorship is not a separate legal entity. The
sole proprietor is responsible for all the liabilities of the
business, and this is a significant drawback.
8-14
©2006 Prentice Hall
Sole Proprietorship
(2 of 2)
8-15
©2006 Prentice Hall
Partnerships
(1 of 2)
• Partnerships
– If two or more people start a business, they must organize as a
partnership, corporation, or limited liability company.
– Partnerships are organized as either general or limited partnerships.
• A general partnership is a form of business organization where two or
more people pool their skills, abilities, and resources to run a business.
• A limited partnership is a modified form of general partnership. The major
difference between the two is that a limited partnership includes two
classes of owners: general partners and limited partners. The general
partners are liable for the debts and obligations of the partnership, but the
limited partners are liable only up to the amount of their investment.
8-16
©2006 Prentice Hall
Partnerships
(2 of 2)
8-17
©2006 Prentice Hall
Corporations
(1 of 5)
• Corporations
– A corporation is a separate legal entity organized under the
authority of a state.
– Corporations are organized as either C corporations or
subchapter S corporations.
• C Corporations
– A C corporation is a separate legal entity that, in the eyes
of the law, is separate from its owners.
– In most cases the corporation shields its owners, who are
called shareholders, from personal liability for the debts of
the corporation.
8-18
©2006 Prentice Hall
Corporations
(2 of 5)
• C Corporations (continued)
– A corporation is governed by a board of directors, which is
elected by the shareholders.
– A corporation is formed by filing articles of incorporation
with the secretary of state’s office in the state of
incorporation.
– A corporation is taxed as a separate legal entity.
• A disadvantage of corporations is that they are subject to double-
taxation, which means that a corporation is taxed on its net income
and, when the same income is distributed to shareholders in the
form of dividends, is taxed again on shareholders’ personal tax
returns.
8-19
©2006 Prentice Hall
Corporations
(3 of 5)
8-20
©2006 Prentice Hall
Corporations
(4 of 5)
• Subchapter S Corporation
– A subchapter S corporation combines the advantages of a
partnership and a C corporation. It is similar to a
partnership in that the profits and losses of the business are
not subject to double taxation.
– The subchapter S corporation does not pay taxes; instead,
the profits or losses of the business are passed through to
the individual tax returns of the owners.
– It is similar to a corporation in that the owners are not
subject to personal liability for the behavior of the
business.
8-21
©2006 Prentice Hall
Corporations
(5 of 5)
There are strict standards that a business must meet to qualify for status as a
subchapter S corporation. The standards are shown below:
8-22
©2006 Prentice Hall
Limited Liability Company
(1 of 2)
8-24
©2006 Prentice Hall
The Legal Environment of the Internet
8-25
©2006 Prentice Hall
The World Wide Web
(1 of 3)
This type of Web site • All content placed on the Web site
Shop-Window
Web Site provides information should be original, unless permission
about a company and its has been obtained.
products but encourages
• Pricing information should be updated
very little interaction.
frequently.
• Misleading product descriptions can
cause repercussions.
• Misleading advertising should be
avoided.
8-26
©2006 Prentice Hall
The World Wide Web
(2 of 3)
Contributed Web sites that The most common problem in this area
Content Web encourage visitors to arises when sites encourage visitors to
Sites interact are exposed to interact by making discussion boards
several additional or chat rooms available. Reasonable
forms of legal risks. measures should be taken to control
the material that appears on the Web
site. These measures need to be
addressed in a Web site’s “terms and
conditions” so that anyone viewing the
Web site is aware of the steps taken to
prevent problems from occurring.
8-27
©2006 Prentice Hall
The World Wide Web
(3 of 3)
Full E-Commerce Full E-Commerce Web New businesses that plan to sell
Web Site sites sell goods and products or services via the Web
services via the Web. should consult with an attorney to be
sure they know all the current laws
and regulations that apply. An
important caveat of selling online is to
make sure to form a legally binding
contract with the purchaser. To do
this, many sites require their
customers to scroll through a list of
terms and conditions and click on an
“I accept” button before a purchase
can be completed.
8-28
©2006 Prentice Hall
Trademarks and Domain Names
(1 of 3)
• Trademarks
– The emergence of the Internet has led to a variety of issues
in trademark law and practice.
– Because it is so easy to find a company with the same name
as your company’s name on the Internet, trademark
disputes often arise.
• For example, in the past, a consulting firm in Michigan operating
under the name Ivey Consulting may have never known that a
similar firm in California operated under the same name. Now, its
easy for the firms to stumble across one another surfing the
Internet, which could result in a trademark infringement suit by the
company that first registered the name.
8-29
©2006 Prentice Hall
Trademarks and Domain Names
(2 of 3)
• Domain Names
– A domain name is a company’s Internet address (e.g.,
www.intel.com).
– Most companies want their domain name to be the same as
their company’s name.
– It is easy to register a domain name through an online
registration service (www.networksolutions.com).
• Until recently, some people, called cybersquatters, registered the
domain names of companies and people for the sole purpose of
trying to resell the names (for a substantial profit) to those
companies or individuals. (Next slide)
8-30
©2006 Prentice Hall
Trademarks and Domain Names
(3 of 3)
• Domain Names
– To stop the practice of cybersquatting, Congress passed the
Anticybersquatting Consumer Protection Act in 1999.
• Probably the most famous domain name dispute in the history of
the Internet involved the actress Julia Roberts. In June 2000, an
international arbitration panel ruled that an accused cybersquatter
who registered the domain name (www.juliaroberts.com) had no
legitimate interest in the name and registered it in bad faith. The
panel awarded the name to Julia Roberts. In finding bad-faith
intent, the arbitration panel cited evidence that the defendant had
registered the names of several famous movie and sports figures
and even tried to auction off the name Julia Robert’s domain name
on eBay’s Web site.
8-31
©2006 Prentice Hall
Electronic Contracts and Digital Signatures
8-32
©2006 Prentice Hall