In 1963, Stanley Milgram created an experiment to see if participants would follow orders even when the requested behavior went against their moral beliefs or good judgments.
The participants claimed that they
administered the shocks for three main reasons:
1. The authority figure seemed
trustworthy 2. The cause was good (scientific research) 3. They believed that if anything bad happened, the researcher would take full responsibility. A researcher asks the participant to administer electric shocks to a test subject when he answers questions incorrectly. The test subject is an actor, who makes noises of pain when he receives the shocks. The participant is made to believe that each shock is stronger than the last one. result All of Milgram’s original participants continued the experiment to 300 volts of electricity. 65% of them administered the maximum voltage of 450, which was clearly labeled as life-threatening. Milgram concluded that ordinary people are likely to follow orders given by an authority figure, even to the extent of killing an innocent human being. Why was the Milgram experiment considered unethical? Milgram Concluded that people will obey authority figures even in morally questionable circumstances, but the subjects thought they were actually listening to someone being electrocuted on the other end of the line, even though they were told by the experimenter that there would be “no permanent tissue damage.” Leaving your subjects feeling like they may have just killed someone doesn’t protect their well being.
And they couldn’t have gotten informed consent, since warning
participants about the experiment would have changed how they reacted. The Milgram Experiment #Team WestGrad MA. AUXILIA T. JAYME M. Ed. ECE