Professional Documents
Culture Documents
FUNDAMENTAL OF ACCOUNTING II
by
MIKIYAS NIGUSSIE
Contact Address:
mikiyasnigussie8@gmail.com
MAY , 2022
MIKIYAS NIGUSSIE 1
Chapter 1
INVENTORY
Chapter
14-2
6-3
Preview of CHAPTER 1
6-4
Inventory Issues
Classification
Inventories are:
items held for sale, or
goods to be used in the production of goods to be sold.
Merchandiser or Manufacturer
Merchandising Manufacturing
Company Company
6-6
Inventory Issues
Inventory Cost Flow
Illustration 1-2
Beginning inventory
$ XX
Purchases, net
XX
Goods availablebetween
LO 2 Distinguish for sale
perpetual and periodic inventory systems.
Inventory Cost Flow
Illustration: Fesmire Company had the following
transactions during the current year.
Illustration 1-11
**
* $4,000 x 2% = $80
** $10,000 x 98% = $9,800
6-14
Determining Inventory Quantities
Goods in Transit
6-15
Determining Inventory Quantities
Question
Goods in transit should be included in the inventory of the
buyer when the:
6-16
Inventory Costing
Cost Flow
Assumptions
6-17
Inventory Costing
First-In-First-Out (FIFO)
Earliest goods purchased are first to be sold.
6-18
Inventory Costing
6-19
Inventory Costing
First-In-First-Out (FIFO)
6-20
Inventory Costing
First-In-First-Out (FIFO)
6-21
Inventory Costing
Average Cost
Allocates cost of goods available for sale on the basis
of weighted-average unit cost incurred.
6-22
Inventory Costing
Average Cost
6-23
Inventory Costing
Average Cost
6-24
Inventory Costing
6-25
Inventory Costing
Question
The cost flow method that often parallels the actual
physical flow of merchandise is the:
a. FIFO method.
b. LIFO method.
6-26
Cost Flow Assumptions and the Perpetual and
periodic Inventory Systems
$ 8,000
Purchases:
6,000 x $4.40
26,400 LO 5
Specific Identification
Illustration: Assume that Call-Mart Inc.’s 6,000 units of inventory
consists of 1,000 units from the March 2 purchase, 3,000 from the
March 15 purchase, and 2,000 from the March 30 purchase.
Compute the amount of ending inventory and cost of goods sold.
Illustration 1-12
Average Cost
Weighted-Average Illustration 1-13
Determine cost of ending inventory by taking the cost of the most recent
purchase and working back until it accounts for all units in the inventory.
In all cases where FIFO is used, the inventory and cost of goods sold
would be the same at the end of the month whether a perpetual or
periodic system is used.
Common Cause:
Failure to count or price inventory correctly.
Not properly recognizing the transfer of legal title to
goods in transit.
Errors affect both the income statement and balance
sheet.
6-33
Inventory Costing
6-34
Inventory Costing
Over the two years, the total net income is correct because
the errors offset each other.
6-35
Inventory Costing
2011 2012
Incorrect Correct Incorrect Correct
Sales $ 80,000 $ 80,000 $ 90,000 $ 90,000
Beginning inventory 20,000 20,000 12,000 15,000
Cost of goods purchased 40,000 40,000 68,000 68,000
Cost of goods available 60,000 60,000 80,000 83,000
Ending inventory 12,000 15,000 23,000 23,000
Cost of good sold 48,000 45,000 57,000 60,000
Gross profit 32,000 35,000 33,000 30,000
Operating expenses 10,000 10,000 20,000 20,000
Net income $ 22,000 $ 25,000 $ 13,000 $ 10,000
6-36
Inventory Costing
Question
Understating ending inventory will overstate:
a. assets.
c. net income.
d. owner's equity.
6-37
Inventory Costing
6-38
Estimating Inventories
6-39
Estimating Inventories
6-40
Estimating Inventories
6-41
Estimating Inventories
Illustration:
6-42
Key Points
The requirements for accounting for and reporting
inventories are more principles-based under IFRS. That is,
GAAP provides more detailed guidelines in inventory
accounting.
The definitions for inventory are essentially similar under
IFRS and GAAP. Both define inventory as assets held-for-
sale in the ordinary course of business, in the process of
production for sale (work in process), or to be consumed in
the production of goods or services (e.g., raw materials).
6-43
Key Points
Who owns the goods—goods in transit or consigned goods
—as well as the costs to include in inventory, are accounted
for the same under IFRS and GAAP.
Both GAAP and IFRS permit specific identification where
appropriate. IFRS actually requires that the specific
identification method be used where the inventory items are
not interchangeable (i.e., can be specifically identified). If the
inventory items are not specifically identifiable, a cost flow
assumption is used. GAAP does not specify situations in
which specific identification must be used.
6-44
Key Points
A major difference between IFRS and GAAP relates to the
LIFO cost flow assumption. GAAP permits the use of LIFO
for inventory valuation. IFRS prohibits its use. FIFO and
average-cost are the only two acceptable cost flow
assumptions permitted under IFRS.
IFRS requires companies to use the same cost flow
assumption for all goods of a similar nature. GAAP has no
specific requirement in this area.
6-45
Key Points
In the lower-of-cost-or-market test for inventory valuation,
IFRS defines market as net realizable value. Net realizable
value is the estimated selling price in the ordinary course of
business, less the estimated costs of completion and
estimated selling expenses. In other words, net realizable
value is the best estimate of the net amounts that
inventories are expected to realize. GAAP, on the other
hand, defines market as essentially replacement cost.
6-46
Key Points
Under GAAP, if inventory is written down under the lower-of-
cost-or-market valuation, the new value becomes its cost
basis. As a result, the inventory may not be written back up
to its original cost in a subsequent period. Under IFRS, the
write-down may be reversed in a subsequent period up to
the amount of the previous write-down. Both the write-down
and any subsequent reversal should be reported on the
income statement as an expense. An item-by-item approach
is generally followed under IFRS.
6-47
Key Points
Unlike property, plant, and equipment, IFRS does not permit
the option of valuing inventories at fair value. As indicated
above, IFRS requires inventory to be written down, but
inventory cannot be written up above its original cost.
Similar to GAAP, certain agricultural products and mineral
products can be reported at net realizable value using IFRS.
6-48
Looking to the Future
One convergence issue relates to the use of the LIFO cost flow
assumption. IFRS specifically prohibits its use. Conversely, the
LIFO cost flow assumption is widely used in the United States
because of its favorable tax advantages. With a new conceptual
framework being developed, it is highly probable that the use of
the concept of conservatism will be eliminated. Similarly, the
concept of “prudence” in the IASB literature will also be
eliminated. This may ultimately have implications for the
application of the lower-of-cost-or-net realizable value.
6-49
IFRS Self-Test Questions
6-50
IFRS Self-Test Questions
a) Specific identification.
b) FIFO.
c) LIFO.
d) Average-cost.
6-51
IFRS Self-Test Questions
Specific identification:
6-52
END
Chapter 1
6-53