preparation mistakes MSA Fixed prosthodontics department
Student name: Abdelrahman Saad
ID: 192465 Buccal Fl of lower first molar Staff observations 1-uncontrolled(aggressive) reduction of FL
2_NO even Fl surface thickness
3_Fl should not exceed 0.5mm thickness
4_Function cusp bevel should be 45ْ degree
on Buccal surface which appears you couldn’t achieve
5_convergance of buccal surface is not preserved
6_very poor finishing and polishing
Staff comments Your preparation sequences in clinic 1_ Aggressive cutting during preparation will leed to exposing dentin or even pulp results in complications to your patient not treatment. (more sensitive teeth under a metallic crown, discoloration and cracks under your crown ) 2_Achieving equal and smooth surface of prepared crown means good cementation with no gaps between prepared abutment and the crown 3-proper pass of insertion will not be achieved without smooth prepared surface and rounded line an 4_0.5mm Fl thickness provides a well adaptation for the metallic crown with no open margins 5_Fl should be of same line to avoid open margin defected crown Staff comments • 6_buccl functional cusp bevel should be of 45 degree for CROWN Adaptation on the abutment and prevents tooth crack under masticational forces • 7_convergance of buccal surface is a must preserved while occlusogingival convexity is eliminated to remove divergence along with the undercut area below the height of contour. • 8_ All line angles between the four axial surfaces should be rounded to remove cervical triangular undercuts. • 9_Finish line should be continuous and distinct around the whole circumference of the preparation. Staff advices • 1_ train on handling contra always think that your role as a dentist is to preserve the tooth structure as much as possible following the most conservative approach on your clinic • 2_ eyes, brain and hand with training will achieve neuromuscular coordination trough out time • 3_in clinic you will face a lot of variation of enamel a dentin thickness depends on the age of the patient race and nutrition, so you have to follow a conservative preparation approach to avoid complications after your dental procedure Staff advices • 4_ Always follow the guideline for you type of preparation 5_ Stay parallel when reducing buccal, lingual and proximal and let the taper of the stone do the work as it will spontaneously achieve the convergence you need • 6_Use sandpaper discs for finishing and polishing your preparation Occlusal surface preparation Staff observations (on lower second premolar) • 1_Anatomical landmarks has not preserved • 2_functional cusp reduced more than needed • 3_ flat occlusal surface • 4_deed and shallow central groove • 5_poor finishing and surface irregularities Staff comments • 1_your prepared occlusal surface is flat which will provide poor retention for the crown • 2_ functional cusp reduced more than 1.5mm which reflects that you didn’t use an index, or you were aggressive during preparation • 3_deep central groove shows that you need to train to achieve the right angle of contra during work • 4_ surface irregularities means your way of cutting is wrong and you go up and down with contra on the same plane Staff comments • 5_a good finish is a must • 6_too much reduction may expose the pulp as the pulp horns downward the cusps of molars • 7_the central groove says that you were making a cavity not a reduction -__- Staff advices • 1_always use index to make sure of your measurements • 2_cutting should be gentile and on planes • 3-use carbide fissure bur to make groove depth which will be of much help on your occlusal reduction, Depth grooves are placed to quantify reduction and ensure even thickness • 4_wheel diamond stone may help you in achieving a good occlusal reduction Staff advices • 5_you should pay a great attention to occlusal reduction which will ease other surfaces reduction • 6_ Use sandpaper discs for finishing and polishing your preparation • 7_take cusps on planes Occlusal surface reduction Staff observation on lower 6 • Although you used depth grooves you still aggressive in cutting Lingual surface reduction Staff observations • 1_finish line is too thin for a metallic restoration • 2_irricularities on the Fl • 3_surfice irregularities • 4_occlusogingival convexity is not eliminated Staff comments • 1_occlusogingival convexity must be eliminated • 2_Fl should be of same thickness at ant point of the surface • 3_finishing is a must for surface retention with the crown • 4_0.5 chamfer finish line should be achieved for FMC Staff advices • Lingual surface should be cutted on one plane • Stay parallel during FL preparation • We neve take an impression for unfinished and polished teeth as the • Train more Proximal surface reduction Staff observations • 1_no even thickness of Fl • 2_cervical undercuts • 3_sharp areas existed • 4_no roundation of line and point angles • 5_no finishing Staff comments • 1_Finish line should be continuous and distinct around the whole circumference of the preparation. Although these comments which for a while may appears sharp and stinging sometimes especially when you have different opinions on the same preparation but we all thankful for your support, patience and decency while providing us these comments.