• There are a number of approaches to the analysis of the policy process which draw upon economic theory. Choices that are made in the competitive market situations and are applied to the political process. In this sense, individual consider their own interest that's why the word “rational” is used. • Rational choice theory states that individuals use rational calculations to make rational choices and achieve outcomes that are aligned with their own personal objectives. These results are also associated with maximizing an individual's self-interest. Using rational choice theory is expected to result in outcomes that provide people with the greatest benefit and satisfaction, given the limited option they have available. The development of the idea of the Political Marketplace • The idea of politics as a marketplace in which leaders compete for votes is developed in the work of Downs (1957), who uses economic theory to analyse political behaviour. • This perspective is based on pluralist theory due to the role of multiple actors and economic theory due to the economist reasoning in which self interest is the dominant motive force in political behaviour. • In the political marketplace, parties compete to win power by responding to the demands of pressure groups. The development of the idea of the Political Marketplace (continue) • There is a very strong pressure upon governments to fulfil those demands, this enhance the role of the state as a giver of benefits such as governments provide jobs, contracts, services and tax concessions as well as direct cash benefits. • In this process, interest groups also seek specific benefits for themselves like business subsidies, welfare services, etc. whose costs are paid by taxpayers as a whole. This whole process involves what is often described as ‘*rent-seeking behaviour’. *Rent-seeking Behavior • A concept in economics and public/rational choice theory where an individual and entity gain financial benefit from governments to increase their own wealth without adding any benefit to the society. for example a company get tariff relief or subsidy (for that product they produce) from government. So this company only receive the benefit not the whole society, as a result inequality enter into the society. Rational Choice and Collective Action • Rational choice theory use market mechanisms to settle collective choice problems. It aims to show that public policy choices are made like market choices. • It is argued that policy initiatives developed to deal with the deficiencies of markets (market failure) as well as the deficiencies of the state (state failure). • In this respect, rational choice theory is more concerned about the way public policy should be made rather than how it is made. • Anthony Downs (1957) was the first to apply rational choice theory. • The rational choice theory stated that individual make rational choices and decisions that are based on rational information that provide benefits to the individuals and that are aligned with their personal beliefs and self interest. • Three key concepts are used in the discussion of RCT: a) Externalities b) Monopoly c) Market inefficiencies (a) Externalities • Externalities arise during market activities, either positive or negative. Externalities occurs when production and consumption of a good or service impacts a third party. These externalities affect even those people who do not participate to those activities. • Failure to give attention to externalities means that all suffer in the long run. One of the most obvious example of negative externality is pollution. Such as during production process, manufacturing factories releases harmful gases and waste products into the air and water. Neighbours suffer the consequences of this action. Here, then, the state intervention is needed to prevent these nuisance objects. • Failure to deal with negative externalities has been described as *‘the tragedy of the commons’ . *Tragedy of Commons as negative externality • The tragedy of the commons is an economic theory in which individuals exploit shared resources as a result it becomes unavailable for the whole. It impose negative impact. • A tragedy of the commons occurs when a group of people in a community use a shared resource for their self-interest, which leads to the destruction of the resource for the whole community. It is an environmental and economic problem highlighting the conflict between individual and collective rationality. • In tragedy of common, individuals consume a shared recourse, for example a group of cattle owners who use a common pasture, decides to increase their number of cattle to maximize profits. Unfortunately, this can lead to overgrazing and eventually the total destruction of the pasture for everyone. Free Rider as a Positive Externality • Positive externalities are not a source of problems. This occurs when the production or consumption of a good causes a benefits to a third party. However, the positive externality can be describe as the concept of ‘free riders’. • A free rider is a person who benefits from something without expending effort or paying for it. In other words, free riders are those who utilize goods without paying for their use. For example, a person construct a wall along river to protect its land and property from flooding but this wall also protecting their neighbours property. Thus other people are the free riders as they are taking benefits from it. (b)Monopoly • Monopoly is one of the most common causes. If a single actor acquires all of the means of production in a market, it will set prices as they wish because it will face no competition. Often, this company will set prices much higher than they need because no one else can compete with them, so their rational decision will be to profit more. Such as in the supply of water, electricity and gas, transport systems and large institutions like hospitals and schools. • Here, these is the need of state intervention. State play a role in preventing the abuse of monopoly power by preventing exploitation of rights and providing subsidy to other suppliers. (c)Market inefficiencies and State interventions
• Thus externalities, incomplete knowledge and monopoly provides a
series of justifications for public policies and state interventions. This incapacity of public institutions to function efficiently or equitably can leads to ‘market failure’ sometimes called ‘state failure’, • Market failure can be caused by a lack of information, monopoly, public goods, and externalities. Market failures can be corrected through government intervention, such as new laws or taxes, tariffs, subsidies, and trade restrictions.
7th 7. International Mezinárodní Conference Konference Architecture Architektura and Urbanism A Urbanismus Contemporary Současný Research Výzkum 7 - 8 / 12 / 2017 Edited