You are on page 1of 75

Course:

Theory of Finance
and Money

Dang Anh Tuan,


PhD.

Copyright © 2010 Pearson Addison-Wesley. All rights reserved.


What is finance?

1-2
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Addison-Wesley. All rights reserved.
Meaning of finance (Longman Concise
Dictionary of Business English)

1-3
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Addison-Wesley. All rights reserved.
Financial management
• Personal Finance
• Corporate finance
• Public finance
• Multinational Finance

1-4
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Addison-Wesley. All rights reserved.
Understanding finance, money
and markets
• Finance in business:
– Finance is a key factor in the success of any
business.
– Businesses need finance to:
• start up
• operate
• expand.
– The size of a business and the nature of its
ownership determine the finance options
available.

1-5
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Addison-Wesley. All rights reserved.
Business structures and finance
• The owners of a business usually choose the
structure that will help management to
maximise the value of the business entity.
• Important considerations are:
– size
– taxation
– legal liability
– ability to raise cash for finance.

1-6
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Addison-Wesley. All rights reserved.
Business structures and finance
• Sole traders:
– Owned by one person, typically consisting of the
trader and a handful of employees.
– Simplest type of business to start and it is the
least regulated.
– Keep all the profits from the business and do not
have to share decision‐making authority.
– But, have unlimited liability for all the business's
debts and other obligations.

1-7
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Addison-Wesley. All rights reserved.
Business structures and finance
• Partnerships:
– Two or more owners legally managing a business.
– A formal partnership agreement is recommended.
– Have access to more capital, and the pooling of
knowledge, experience and skills.
– But, disputes can occur over profit sharing,
administration and business development.
– Limited liability: consists of general (unlimited)
and limited partners.

1-8
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Addison-Wesley. All rights reserved.
Business structures and finance
• Companies:
– An independent legal entity able to do business in
its own right.
– The owners of a company are its shareholders.
• Shareholders have limited liability.
– Public companies can list on the stock exchange

1-9
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Addison-Wesley. All rights reserved.
The financial goals of a business
• For business owners, it is important to
determine the appropriate goal for financial
management decisions.
• What should management maximise?
– Depending on preferences and tolerance for risk,
any goals can be set for the business.
• Why not maximise profits?

1-10
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Addison-Wesley. All rights reserved.
The financial goals of a business
• Why not maximise profits?
– Goal for financial decision‐making is profit
maximisation.
– Potential problems:
• Hard to define ‘profit’.
• Must consider the timing of cash flows.
– The time value of money is one of the most important
concepts in finance.
• Ignores the uncertainty of cash flows.

1-11
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Addison-Wesley. All rights reserved.
The financial goals of a business
• Maximise the value of the company’s
shares:
– Asset value is determined by the future cash
flows.
– When determining the value of a company’s
shares, the below should be considered:
1. the size of the expected cash flows
2. the timing of the cash flows
3. the riskiness of the cash flows.
– An appropriate goal is to maximise the current
value of the company’s shares.

1-12
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Addison-Wesley. All rights reserved.
The financial goals of a business
• Can management decisions affect share
prices?
– It is affected by a number of factors and
management can control only some of them.
• Direct and indirect impacts.
• Long term and short term impacts.
• Internal and external factors.

1-13
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Addison-Wesley. All rights reserved.
The financial goals of a business
• Can management decisions affect
share prices?
– Major factors that affect share prices:

1-14
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Addison-Wesley. All rights reserved.
The financial manager
• The financial manager:
– Responsible for making decisions that are in the
best interests of the business’s owners.
– Should make decisions that maximise the value
of the owners’ shares - helps maximise the
owners’ wealth.

1-15
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Addison-Wesley. All rights reserved.
The financial manager
• The financial manager:
– Stakeholders:
• Someone other than an owner who has a claim on the
cash flows of the company.
– Managers, creditors, employees, suppliers and the
government.
• May have interests that differ from those of the owners.

1-16
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Addison-Wesley. All rights reserved.
The financial manager
• Cash flows between the company and
its stakeholders and owners:

1-17
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Addison-Wesley. All rights reserved.
The financial manager
• Three fundamental decisions in financial
management:
1. Capital budgeting decisions:
• Identifying the productive assets the company should
buy.
2. Financing decisions:
• Determining how the company should finance or pay for
assets.

1-18
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Addison-Wesley. All rights reserved.
The financial manager
• Three fundamental decisions in financial
management:
3. Working capital management decisions:
• Determining how day‐to‐day financial matters should be.

1-19
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Addison-Wesley. All rights reserved.
The financial manager
• How the financial manager’s decisions
affect the balance sheet:

1-20
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Addison-Wesley. All rights reserved.
Managing the financial function

• Simplified company organisation


chart:

1-21
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Addison-Wesley. All rights reserved.
Ethics in business
• The term ethics describes a society’s ideas
about what actions are right and wrong.
• Ethical values are not moral absolutes and
they can and do vary across societies.
• But, we would all probably prefer to live in a
world where people behave ethically.

1-22
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Addison-Wesley. All rights reserved.
Ethics in business
• Are business ethics different from
everyday ethics?
– Some refer to business ethics as the same as the
‘ethics of the poker game’.
– Normally, investors only learn the hard way about
companies that have been behaving unethically.
• For example, Storm Financial Limited or Opes Prime
Stockbroking Limited.
– But, regardless, ethics do matter in business.

1-23
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Addison-Wesley. All rights reserved.
Ethics in business
• Types of ethical conflicts in business:
– Most problems involve three related areas:
• Agency obligations:
– To act honestly with respect to financial transactions.
• Conflicts of interest.
• Information asymmetry:
– When one party has information that is unavailable to the
other parties.

1-24
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Addison-Wesley. All rights reserved.
Ethics in business
• The importance of an ethical business
culture:
– The business culture has a powerful influence on
the way people behave and the way they make
decisions.
– An unethical business culture can lead to adverse
consequences — not only to the management
and investors, but also to the general public.

1-25
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Addison-Wesley. All rights reserved.
Risk and Rates of Return

 Stand-alone risk
 Portfolio risk
 Risk & return: CAPM / SML

5-26
Investment returns

The rate of return on an investment can be


calculated as follows:
(Amount received – Amount invested)
________________________
Return =
Amount invested

For example, if $1,000 is invested and $1,100


is returned after one year, the rate of return
for this investment is:
($1,100 - $1,000) / $1,000 = 10%. 1-27
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Addison-Wesley. All rights reserved.
What is investment risk?

• Two types of investment risk


– Stand-alone risk
– Portfolio risk
• Investment risk is related to the
probability of earning a low or negative
actual return.
• The greater the chance of lower than
expected or negative returns, the
riskier the investment.
1-28
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Addison-Wesley. All rights reserved.
Probability distributions

• A listing of all possible outcomes, and


the probability of each occurrence.
• Can be shown graphically.

Firm X

Firm Y
Rate of
-70 0 15 100 Return (%)

Expected Rate of Return


1-29
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Addison-Wesley. All rights reserved.
Returns,
1926 – 2001

Average
Standard
Return
Deviation
Small-company stocks 17.3%
33.2%
Large-company stocks 12.7
20.2
L-T corporate bonds 6.1 8.6
L-T government bonds 5.7 9.4
U.S. Treasury bills 3.9 3.2 1-30
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Addison-Wesley. All rights reserved.
Investment alternatives

Economy Prob. T-Bill HT Coll USR MP


Recession 0.1 8.0% -22.0% 28.0% 10.0% -13.0%

Below avg 0.2 8.0% -2.0% 14.7% -10.0% 1.0%

Average 0.4 8.0% 20.0% 0.0% 7.0% 15.0%

Above avg 0.2 8.0% 35.0% -10.0% 45.0% 29.0%

Boom 0.1 8.0% 50.0% -20.0% 30.0% 43.0%

1-31
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Addison-Wesley. All rights reserved.
Why is the T-bill return
independent of the economy?
Do T-bills promise a
completely risk-free return?

T-bills will return the promised 8%, regardless of


the economy.
No, T-bills do not provide a risk-free return, as they
are still exposed to inflation. Although, very little
unexpected inflation is likely to occur over such a
short period of time.
T-bills are also risky in terms of reinvestment rate
risk.
T-bills are risk-free in the default sense of the word.
1-32
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Addison-Wesley. All rights reserved.
How do the returns of HT
and Coll. behave in relation
to the market?
• HT – Moves with the economy, and has a
positive correlation. This is typical.
• Coll. – Is countercyclical with the economy,
and has a negative correlation. This is
unusual.

1-33
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Addison-Wesley. All rights reserved.
Return: Calculating the
expected return for each
alternative

^
k  expected rate of return
^ n
k   k i Pi
i1

^
k HT  (-22.%) (0.1)  (-2%) (0.2)
 (20%) (0.4)  (35%) (0.2)
 (50%) (0.1)  17.4%

1-34
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Addison-Wesley. All rights reserved.
Summary of expected
returns for all
alternatives
Exp return
HT 17.4%
Market 15.0%
USR 13.8%
T-bill 8.0%
Coll. 1.7%

HT has the highest expected return, and


appears to be the best investment
alternative, but is it really? Have we failed
to account for risk?
1-35
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Addison-Wesley. All rights reserved.
Risk: Calculating the
standard deviation for each
alternative

  Standard deviation

  Variance  2
n
  (k  k̂ ) P
i1
i
2
i

1-36
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Addison-Wesley. All rights reserved.
Standard deviation calculation

n ^
  i1
(k i  k ) 2 Pi

1
(8.0 - 8.0) (0.1)  (8.0 - 8.0) (0.2)
2 2
 2

 T bills   (8.0 - 8.0)2 (0.4)  (8.0 - 8.0)2 (0.2) 



2
 (8.0 - 8.0) (0.1) 

 T bills  0.0%  Coll  13.4%


 HT  20.0%  USR  18.8%
 M  15.3%
1-37
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Addison-Wesley. All rights reserved.
Comparing standard
deviations

Prob.
T - bill

USR

HT

0 8 13.8 17.4 Rate of Return (%)


1-38
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Addison-Wesley. All rights reserved.
Comments on standard
deviation as a measure of
risk
• Standard deviation (σi) measures total, or
stand-alone, risk.
• The larger σi is, the lower the probability
that actual returns will be closer to
expected returns.
• Larger σi is associated with a wider
probability distribution of returns.
• Difficult to compare standard deviations,
because return has not been accounted
for.

1-39
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Addison-Wesley. All rights reserved.
Comparing risk and return

Security Expected Risk, σ


return
T-bills 8.0% 0.0%
HT 17.4% 20.0%
Coll* 1.7% 13.4%
USR* 13.8% 18.8%
Market 15.0% 15.3%
* Seem out of place.

1-40
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Addison-Wesley. All rights reserved.
Coefficient of Variation (CV)

A standardized measure of dispersion


about the expected value, that shows
the risk per unit of return.

Std dev 
CV   ^
Mean k

1-41
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Addison-Wesley. All rights reserved.
Risk rankings,
by coefficient of variation

CV
T-bill 0.000
HT 1.149
Coll. 7.882
USR 1.362
Market 1.020
Collections has the highest degree of risk per unit of
return.
HT, despite having the highest standard deviation of
returns, has a relatively average CV.
1-42
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Addison-Wesley. All rights reserved.
Illustrating the CV as a
measure of relative risk
Prob.

A B

0 Rate of Return (%)

σA = σB , but A is riskier because of a larger


probability of losses. In other words, the
same amount of risk (as measured by σ) for
less returns. 1-43
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Addison-Wesley. All rights reserved.
Investor attitude towards risk

• Risk aversion – assumes investors


dislike risk and require higher rates of
return to encourage them to hold
riskier securities.
• Risk premium – the difference
between the return on a risky asset
and less risky asset, which serves as
compensation for investors to hold
riskier securities.

1-44
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Addison-Wesley. All rights reserved.
Portfolio construction:
Risk and return

Assume a two-stock portfolio is created with


$50,000 invested in both HT and Collections.

Expected return of a portfolio is a


weighted average of each of the
component assets of the portfolio.
Standard deviation is a little more tricky
and requires that a new probability
distribution for the portfolio returns be
devised.
1-45
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Addison-Wesley. All rights reserved.
Calculating portfolio
expected return

^
k p is a weighted average :

^ n ^
k p   wi k i
i1

^
k p  0.5 (17.4%)  0.5 (1.7%)  9.6%

1-46
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Addison-Wesley. All rights reserved.
An alternative method for
determining portfolio expected
return

Economy Prob. HT Coll Port.


Recession 0.1 -22.0% 28.0% 3.0%
Below avg 0.2 -2.0% 14.7% 6.4%
Average 0.4 20.0% 0.0% 10.0%
Above avg 0.2 35.0% -10.0% 12.5%
Boom 0.1 50.0% -20.0% 15.0%
^
k p  0.10 (3.0%)  0.20 (6.4%)  0.40 (10.0%)
 0.20 (12.5%)  0.10 (15.0%)  9.6%
1-47
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Addison-Wesley. All rights reserved.
Calculating portfolio
standard deviation and CV

1
 0.10 (3.0 - 9.6) 2
 2

 0.20 (6.4 - 9.6)2 


 
 p   0.40 (10.0 - 9.6)2   3.3%
 0.20 (12.5 - 9.6)2 
 2

  0.10 (15.0 - 9.6) 

3.3%
CVp   0.34
9.6%
1-48
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Addison-Wesley. All rights reserved.
Comments on portfolio
risk measures

• σp = 3.3% is much lower than the σi of


either stock (σHT = 20.0%; σColl. =
13.4%).
• σp = 3.3% is lower than the weighted
average of HT and Coll.’s σ (16.7%).
• \ Portfolio provides average return of
component stocks, but lower than
average risk.
• Why? Negative correlation between
stocks. 1-49
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Addison-Wesley. All rights reserved.
General comments about risk

• Most stocks are positively correlated


with the market (ρk,m  0.65).
• σ  35% for an average stock.
• Combining stocks in a portfolio
generally lowers risk.

1-50
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Addison-Wesley. All rights reserved.
Returns distribution for two
perfectly negatively correlated
stocks (ρ = -1.0)

Stock W Stock M Portfolio WM


25 25 25

15 15 15

0 0 0

-10 -10 -10

1-51
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Addison-Wesley. All rights reserved.
Returns distribution for two
perfectly positively correlated
stocks (ρ = 1.0)

Stock M Stock M’ Portfolio MM’


25 25 25

15 15 15

0 0 0

-10 -10 -10

1-52
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Addison-Wesley. All rights reserved.
Creating a portfolio:
Beginning with one stock and
adding randomly selected stocks
to portfolio

• σp decreases as stocks added, because


they would not be perfectly correlated
with the existing portfolio.
• Expected return of the portfolio would
remain relatively constant.
• Eventually the diversification benefits of
adding more stocks dissipates (after
about 10 stocks), and for large stock
portfolios, σp tends to converge to 
20%. 1-53
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Addison-Wesley. All rights reserved.
Illustrating diversification
effects of a stock portfolio
sp (%)
Company-Specific Risk
35

Stand-Alone Risk, sp

20
Market Risk

0
10 20 30 40 2,000+
# Stocks in Portfolio
1-54
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Addison-Wesley. All rights reserved.
Breaking down sources of risk

Stand-alone risk = Market risk + Firm-specific


risk

• Market risk – portion of a security’s stand-


alone risk that cannot be eliminated
through diversification. Measured by
beta.
• Firm-specific risk – portion of a security’s
stand-alone risk that can be eliminated
through proper diversification. 1-55
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Addison-Wesley. All rights reserved.
Failure to diversify

• If an investor chooses to hold a one-stock


portfolio (exposed to more risk than a
diversified investor), would the investor
be compensated for the risk they bear?
– NO!
– Stand-alone risk is not important to a
well-diversified investor.
– Rational, risk-averse investors are
concerned with σp, which is based upon
market risk.
– There can be only one price (the market
return) for a given security.
– No compensation should be earned for 1-56
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Addison-Wesley. All rights reserved.
Capital Asset Pricing
Model (CAPM)

• Model based upon concept that a stock’s


required rate of return is equal to the
risk-free rate of return plus a risk
premium that reflects the riskiness of
the stock after diversification.
• Primary conclusion: The relevant
riskiness of a stock is its contribution to
the riskiness of a well-diversified
portfolio.
1-57
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Addison-Wesley. All rights reserved.
Beta
• Measures a stock’s market risk, and shows a
stock’s volatility relative to the market.
• Indicates how risky a stock is if the stock is
held in a well-diversified portfolio.

1-58
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Addison-Wesley. All rights reserved.
Calculating betas
• Run a regression of past returns of a security
against past returns on the market.
• The slope of the regression line (sometimes
called the security’s characteristic line) is
defined as the beta coefficient for the
security.

1-59
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Addison-Wesley. All rights reserved.
Illustrating the
calculation of beta

_
ki
. Year kM ki
20
15
. 1
2
15%
-5
18%
-10
10 3 12 16
5
_
-5 0 5 10 15 20
kM
-5 Regression line:
. -10
^
ki = -2.59 + 1.44 ^
kM

1-60
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Addison-Wesley. All rights reserved.
Comments on beta
• If beta = 1.0, the security is just as risky as
the average stock.
• If beta > 1.0, the security is riskier than
average.
• If beta < 1.0, the security is less risky than
average.
• Most stocks have betas in the range of 0.5 to
1.5.

1-61
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Addison-Wesley. All rights reserved.
Can the beta of a security
be negative?

• Yes, if the correlation between Stock


i and the market is negative (i.e., ρi,m
< 0).
• If the correlation is negative, the
regression line would slope
downward, and the beta would be
negative.
• However, a negative beta is highly
unlikely.
1-62
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Addison-Wesley. All rights reserved.
Beta coefficients for
HT, Coll, and T-Bills
_
ki HT: β = 1.30
40

20

T-bills: β = 0
_
-20 0 20 40 kM

Coll: β = -0.87

-20
1-63
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Addison-Wesley. All rights reserved.
Comparing expected
return and beta
coefficients
Security Exp. Ret. Beta
HT 17.4% 1.30
Market 15.0 1.00
USR 13.8 0.89
T-Bills 8.0 0.00
Coll. 1.7 -0.87

Riskier securities have higher returns, so


the rank order is OK.

1-64
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Addison-Wesley. All rights reserved.
(SML):
Calculating required rates of
return

SML: ki = kRF + (kM – kRF) βi

• Assume kRF = 8% and kM = 15%.


• The market (or equity) risk premium is RPM
= kM – kRF = 15% – 8% = 7%.

1-65
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Addison-Wesley. All rights reserved.
What is the market risk
premium?

• Additional return over the risk-free


rate needed to compensate investors
for assuming an average amount of
risk.
• Its size depends on the perceived risk
of the stock market and investors’
degree of risk aversion.
• Varies from year to year, but most
estimates suggest that it ranges
between 4% and 8% per year.
1-66
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Addison-Wesley. All rights reserved.
Calculating required rates of
return

• kHT = 8.0% + (15.0% - 8.0%)(1.30)


= 8.0% + (7.0%)(1.30)
= 8.0% + 9.1% = 17.10%
• kM = 8.0% + (7.0%)(1.00) =
15.00%
• kUSR = 8.0% + (7.0%)(0.89) =
14.23%
• kT-bill = 8.0% + (7.0%)(0.00) =
8.00% 1-67
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Addison-Wesley. All rights reserved.
Expected vs. Required returns

^
k k
^
HT 17.4% 17.1% Undervalued (k  k)
^
Market 15.0 15.0 Fairly val ued (k  k)
^
USR 13.8 14.2 Overvalued (k  k)
^
T - bills 8.0 8.0 Fairly val ued (k  k)
^
Coll. 1.7 1.9 Overvalued (k  k)

1-68
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Addison-Wesley. All rights reserved.
Illustrating the
Security Market Line

SML: ki = 8% + (15% – 8%) βi


ki (%)
SML

HT
.. .
kM = 15

kRF = 8 . T-bills USR

-1
. 0 1 2
Risk, βi
Coll.
1-69
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Addison-Wesley. All rights reserved.
An example:
Equally-weighted two-stock
portfolio
• Create a portfolio with 50% invested in HT
and 50% invested in Collections.
• The beta of a portfolio is the weighted
average of each of the stock’s betas.

βP = wHT βHT + wColl βColl


βP = 0.5 (1.30) + 0.5 (-0.87)
βP = 0.215

1-70
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Addison-Wesley. All rights reserved.
Calculating portfolio required
returns

• The required return of a portfolio is the


weighted average of each of the stock’s
required returns.
kP = wHT kHT + wColl kColl
kP = 0.5 (17.1%) + 0.5 (1.9%)
kP = 9.5%

• Or, using the portfolio’s beta, CAPM can be


used to solve for expected return.
kP = kRF + (kM – kRF) βP
kP = 8.0% + (15.0% – 8.0%) (0.215)
1-71
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Addison-Wesley. All rights reserved.
Factors that change the SML
• What if investors raise inflation
expectations by 3%, what would happen
to the SML?
ki (%)
D I = 3% SML2
18 SML1
15
11
8
Risk, βi
0 0.5 1.0 1.5
1-72
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Addison-Wesley. All rights reserved.
Factors that change the SML
• What if investors’ risk aversion
increased, causing the market risk
premium to increase by 3%, what
would happen to the SML?
ki (%)
D RP = 3%
SML2
M

18 SML1
15
11
8
Risk, βi
0 0.5
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Addison-Wesley. All rights reserved.
1.0 1.5 1-73
Verifying the CAPM empirically
• The CAPM has not been verified completely.
• Statistical tests have problems that make
verification almost impossible.
• Some argue that there are additional risk
factors, other than the market risk premium,
that must be considered.

1-74
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Addison-Wesley. All rights reserved.
More thoughts on the CAPM
• Investors seem to be concerned with both
market risk and total risk. Therefore, the
SML may not produce a correct estimate of
ki .
ki = kRF + (kM – kRF) βi + ???
• CAPM/SML concepts are based upon
expectations, but betas are calculated using
historical data. A company’s historical data
may not reflect investors’ expectations about
future riskiness.
1-75
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Addison-Wesley. All rights reserved.

You might also like