Professional Documents
Culture Documents
HGoldberg NGDM07
HGoldberg NGDM07
Break Detection
Several systems provide regulatory analysts with a continual feed of alerts
(or breaks) – detected episodes of interest, patterns of behavior, or outliers.
Breaks also provide a significant reduction of the data to the point where
traditional data mining methods are tractable.
But they currently require manual encoding of knowledge, whether
discovered or heuristic.
Predictive models to allow proactive regulation. Assessing risk
rather than just detecting violations is especially important for
fraud, manipulation, and focusing member regulation reviews.
Presentation of discovered knowledge – methods must be able to
support case presentation in court, relate discovered knowledge
back to specific instances, examples, statistics to support
validity.
Stimulus
event {A1}
B
Acceptable
0-1
events to note
and ignore
C
Acceptable
{B1-B2}
0-1
0-
events to note
(filler)
and ignore
A
Acceptable
Episode 1
{C1}
0-1
events to note
and ignore
1
B
A1
Stimulus
{A2}
Response
event {A1}
event {B2}
longest; 0-1h
Acceptable
B
0-1
eventsAcceptable
to note
events to note
and ignore
and ignore
Acceptable
{B1-B2}
0-1
0C-
Acceptable
events{B1-B2}
to note
events to note
and ignore
Episode
Acceptable
0 - 15m
0- 1
0-1
Acceptable
to note
events{C1}
(filler) 1 -
events to note
and ignore
1
{A2}
Response
event {B2}
Episode 2 longest; 0-1h
event {B2}
B
Acceptable
0-1
events to note
and ignore
C
Acceptable
{B1-B2}
0-1
0-
events to note
(filler)
Episode 2
and ignore
0 - 15m
Acceptable
0-1
{C1}
1-
events to note
and ignore
B
{A2}
Response
event {B2}
Relationships Among Transactions
Break Analysis
Expansion of Network
Prior Pattern History
Incorporation of Outside Data
Discovery of New Patterns
ABCD stated there was “limited activity, with only a few trades in the
market” for this security. However, the audit trail system Localshowed thirty-
comparison with
Concept of “liquidity”
four (34) other firms executed two hundred sixty (260) trades in the
similar same
entities
security in the proceeding week. Sixty-two (62) of these trades occurred on
the same trade date as ABCD trades. This data indicates that the security
Local at
was liquid and readily available in the market comparison
the time ofwith
the trade. ABCD
markup (in relation to comparable “riskless”similar
trades) entities
was by far the highest
during this period of time. The firm also indicated there was “volatility in
the XYZ stock” (which required additional pricing attention) however; the
Counter-evidence
buy order for this transaction was time-stamped at 10:52:00 and HIJK was
able to price the bond and purchase it from another broker-dealer within
twelve (12) minutes (with an execution time of 11:04:00). Thus, the staff
believes that this item should be considered a violation of Rule 2440 and
IM-2440 and included in the further review and a potential regulatory
action.
Relates case to rule