PRESENTED BY MUHAMMAD SANA ULLAH PRESENTED TO PROF. DR SAFDAR HUSSAIN
CLASS M.PHIL ENGLISH
Bilingualism INTRODUCCTION Nowadays there are between 5,000 and 7,000 languages in the world. It is difficult to know the exact number of languages because the distinction between a language and a dialect is not always clear. In fact languages are not isolated entities and in many cases there are no clear boundaries between them, it is rather a continuum that extends along a geographical area. Most of the world’s population speaks more than one language but most of the population in western cultures are monolingual in one of the ‘big’ languages in spite of being exposed to other languages mainly in the school context. Therefore we can say that multilingualism at the sociolinguistic level is more spread than multilingualism at the individual level but even in this case it is extremely common. The spread of multilingualism justifies its importance in research. In fact the study of different aspects of the diversity of languages should be one of the main goals of linguistics. At the psycholinguistic level this has been highlighted by Cook (1992). DEFINITION Bilingualism. The term ‘bilingual’ refers to an individual who uses two or more languages or dialects in his or her everyday life, regardless of the context of use. Taking this definition into account, more than half of the world can be considered bilingual (Giussani, Roux, Lubrano, Gaini and Bello, 2007: 1109). At an individual level, there is a distinction between a person's ability in two language and their use of those two languages. Bilingual typically use their two languages with different people, in different context and for different purposes. Balanced bilinguals with equal and strong competence in their two languages are rare. In terms of ability in two languages, the four basic dimensions are listening, speaking, reading and writing. CONCLUSIONS Bilingualism is shaped in different ways depending on a variety of social and other factors which must be taken into account when trying to assess the skills of speakers and how speakers use the languages they know. It is possible ( or not according to some linguist) for a bilingual to be fluent in both languages taken together without being able to function completely like a monolingual in either one on its own. The study of the behavior of multilingual individuals and societies thus requires us to go beyond many of the concepts and analytical techniques presently used within linguistic theory which are designed for the description of monolingual. There is no evidence to indicate that bilingualism is an inherently problematic mode of organization, either for a society or for an individual. Because languages and dialects are often potent symbols of class, gender, ethnic, and other kinds of differentiation, it is easy to think that language underlies conflict in multilingual societies. Yet disputes involving language are really not about language, but instead about fundamental inequalities between groups who happen to speak different languages.