Professional Documents
Culture Documents
5th Chapter Provisions Relating To Arrest and Search
5th Chapter Provisions Relating To Arrest and Search
Remand
Presented By
1
Outlines of this Chapter
1. Arrest/ How Arrest of a Person is made
2. Rules of Arrest/ Procedure of a Search of a Place
entered by Person sought to be arrested (S/ 47 – 53)
3. Power of Police in case of Arrest without Warrant (s/54)
– Power of Private Person, Magistrate in case of Arrest
– Procedure of Arrest of and MP of Govt. Service Holder (s/172-176)
– Arrest beyond the jurisdiction of Police (s/58, 66, 67)
10
3.1 Power of Private Person, Magistrate in case of Arrest
Power of Private Person in case of Arrest
S/59.(1) Any private person may arrest any person who in
his view commits a non-bailable and cognizable offence,
or any proclaimed offender, and without unnecessary
delay, shall make over any person so arrested to a police-
officer, or, in the absence of a police-officer, take such
person or cause him to be taken in custody to the nearest
police-station.
(2) If there is reason to believe that such person comes
under the provisions of section 54, a police-officer shall
re-arrest him.
(3) If there is no sufficient reason to believe that he has
committed any offence, he shall be at once released. 11
Continued---------
15
Continued-----
16
Remand/ Rules for Application for Remand
• No Explanation in CrPC
• A remand is an action taken by an appellate court in which it sends
back a case to the trial court or lower appellate court for further
action. A case is said to be "remanded" when the superior court
returns or sends back the case to the lower court. Also, a court may
be said to retry the case "on remand.“ (Law Dictionary)
• The remand or detention of a suspect is the process of keeping a
person who has been arrested in custody. Remand of Detained
person means to send back the arrested person to police custody to
further interrogation.
• Sec/ 167 (2) 0f CrPC: 15 Days
• State Vs Wazir Khan 20 DLR 264 WP: IO must write the grounds of
Remand to his CD and without observing this CD-----, remand order
can be declared illegal.
17
Continued---
18
• Thus there is no maximum period fixed by law for order of detention
in police custody by the Magistrate. For how many terms not
exceeding 15 days can the Magistrate authorise detention? This is
not mentioned. In Indian CrPC provisions have been made that the
total period of detention in custody must not exceed 60 days and
such detention must not be in police custody. It is to be noted that in
England there is provision of remand in police custody for not more
than 3 days in total. If the defendant is on bail, there is no statutory
time limit for remand.
• There is no proper guideline as to when such prayer should be accepted and when rejected
by the Magistrate and this legal lacuna gives both the police officer and Magistrates power
to abuse the same. Police officers being motivated or dictated by the executive organ or out
of their personal conflict or aggrandisement seek unreasonable remand under section 167 of
the Code. And the Magistrates in absence of any proper guideline, either being dictated by
the executive organ or otherwise have been accustomed to follow a 'parrot like' order on the
forwarding letter of the police officer authorising detention either in the police custody or in
jail.
19
• The views expressed in favour of police remand is that it is a civil necessity that if
some force is not used, no clue can be found out from hard-nut criminals. On the
other side of the spectra there is a widely held view that to send the arrested
person to police remand prima facie upholds the idea that the accused person did
not give the confession voluntarily. When the entire state machinery acts against
him, he cannot confess voluntarily and as such the provision for granting police
remand several times (although not exceeding 15 days in the whole) totally
destroys the purpose behind it. This is because a person coming before the
Magistrate has no guarantee that he will not be sent again to police remand unless
he has already completed 15 days. It is therefore imperative on the Magistrate to
give reasons for granting a remand.
• Again, article 35(4) of the Constitution states that no person shall be compelled to
be a witness against himself. So the provisions of the CrPC under section 167 are in
direct contrast with the provisions of the Constitution. This CrPC was passed by the
British government back in 1898 when there was no fundamental rights as we
have now in our Constitution. In view of the present provision in article 26 this
provision of police remand seems to be void and this is largely the decision of the
High Court Division in the BLAST v State.
20
5. Shown Arrest (s/351)
• S/351.(1) Any person attending a Criminal Court, although
not under arrest or upon a summons, may be detained by
such Court for the purpose of inquiry into or trial of any
offence of which such Court can take cognizance and
which, from the evidence, may appear to have been
committed, and may be proceeded against as though he had
been arrested or summoned.
(2) When the detention takes place after a trial has been
begun the proceedings in respect of such person shall be
commenced afresh, and the witnesses re-heard.
21
6. Legal Rights of an Arrested Person
• Cr P C gives wide powers to the police for arresting a
person. Such powers without appropriate safeguards will be
harmful for the society.
The Constitution of Bangladesh
• Article 33(1): No person shall be arrested without being
informed and every arrested person shall have the right to
consult and to be defended by a legal practitioner of his
choice.
• Article 33(2): Every person who is arrested and detained in
custody shall be produced before the nearest Magistrate
within a period of 24 hours of such arrest.
• Article 35: Protection in respect of Trial and Punishment
22
Continued-------
• Cr.PC
• S/60. A police-officer making an arrest without warrant
shall, without unnecessary delay and subject to the
provisions herein contained as to bail, take or send the
person arrested before a Magistrate having jurisdiction in
the case, or before the officer in charge of a police-station.
• Section 61 and 167
• Legal Aid Services Act 2000 (LASA).
• Bangladesh Legal Aid and Services Trust vs. Bangladesh
(55 DLR (HCD) 2003 363)
23
7. Guidelines for Arrest under BLAST and others vs.
Bangladesh Case 55 DLR (2003) 363
• Facts: BLAST, Ain o Salish Kendra, Shonmilito Shamajik Andolon and several
individuals filed a writ petition in the High Court challenging the abuse of police
powers to arrest without warrant under Section 54 of the CrPC and the abuse of
powers regarding taking the accused into remand (police custody) under Section
167 of the CrPC. The petitioners referred to recent incidents of gross abuse of
power, including allegations of custodial death, torture and inhuman treatment,
especially the killing of a young student, Rubel, in remand after arrest under Section
54 of the CrPC.
• Argument: The petitioners argued that law enforcing agencies routinely abuse the
powers granted under Sections 54 and 167 of the CrPC, and further that these
provisions suffer from vagueness and allow for arbitrary exercise of power. The
petitioners argued that the Court should enunciate safeguards to prevent or curtail
police abuse of powers and arbitrary actions by Magistrates, which constitute
violations of citizens’ fundamental rights to life and liberty, to equal protection of
law, to be treated in accordance with law and to be free from cruel, inhuman and
degrading treatment and punishment as guaranteed under articles 32, 27, 31, 33 and
35 of the Constitution.
24
• Order: The High Court initially issued a Rule Nisi, and upon full hearing delivered
judgment on 07.04.2003, observing that Sections 54 and 167 of the CrPC are not fully
consistent with constitutionally guaranteed freedoms and safeguards. The Court laid
down a comprehensive set of recommendations regarding necessary amendments to
both sections of the CrPC, along with the Police Act, The Penal Code and the Evidence
Act, and directed that these should be acted upon within six months.
• It also laid down a set of fifteen guidelines with regard to exercise of powers of arrest and
remand:
– No Police officer shall arrest anyone under S/54 for the purpose of detention under S/3 of the Special
Powers Act, 1974
– A police officer shall disclose his/her identity and show his/her ID Card on demand to the person arrested
or those present at the time of arrest
– A record of reasons of arrest and other particulars shall be maintained in a separate register till a special
diary is prescribed
– The concerned officer shall record reasons for marks of injury, if any, on the person arrested and take
him/her to nearest hospital or government doctor
– The person arrested shall be furnished with reasons of arrest within three hours of bringing him/her to the
Police Station
– If the person is not arrested from his/her residence or place of business, the relatives should be informed
over the phone or through messenger within one hour of bringing him/her to Police Station
– The person concerned must be allowed to consult a lawyer of choice or meet nearest relations
• 25
Continued------
– While producing the detained person before the Magistrate under Section 61 of the
CrPC, the police officer must forward reasons in a forwarding letter under Section 167
(1) of the CrPC as to why the investigation could not be completed within 24 hours and
why s/he considers the accusation and information to be well founded
– On perusal of the forwarding letter, if the Magistrate satisfies him/herself that the accusation and
information are well founded and materials in the case diary are sufficient for detaining the person in
custody, the Magistrate shall pass an order of detention and if not, release him/her forthwith
– Where a person is released on the aforesaid grounds, the Magistrate shall proceed under 190(1)(c) of
the CrPC against the Officer concerned under Section 220 of the Penal Code.
– Where the Magistrate orders detention of the person, the Officer shall interrogate the accused in a
room in a jail until a room with glass wall or grille on one side within sight of lawyer or relations is
constructed
– In any application for taking accused in custody for interrogation, reasons should be
mentioned as recommended
– The Magistrate while authorizing detention in police custody shall follow the
recommendations laid down in the judgment
– The police officer arresting under Section 54, or the IO taking a person to custody or the
jailor must inform the nearest Magistrate about the death of any person in custody in
compliance with these recommendations
– The Magistrate shall inquire into the death of any person in police custody or jail as per
the recommendations.
• Status: The Government has preferred an appeal (Civil Appeal No. 53/2004), which is now pending26
before the Appellate Division. However, no stay was granted and the Guidelines are in force.
Thanks for your attention.
Any questions ?
27