Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Trade Protectionism
Trade Protectionism
Protectionism
Getting Started
• Who might benefit and who might lose from these trade
restrictions?
EV:
However, infant industries in general have not grown successfully behind trade barriers
because:
• hard to identify those infant industries with potential
• industries protected by trade barriers lack the competitive pressure to become
efficient
Also, may be more efficient to use policy weapons such as specific subsidies, training
grants, tax reductions, or even the creation of state enterprises
To protect geriatric (or sunset, declining) industries
A geriatric industry in a country is one which is in decline, often because it cannot compete
with those abroad.
EV:
• most geriatric industries are unlikely to regain any comparative advantage they might previously
have enjoyed.
• this also depends on the quality of re-training schemes
To protect domestic industries and employment
Protectionism can protect domestic industries and create or at least preserve jobs. If there is a
large increase in the quantity of steel imported, domestic steel producers will see reduced orders. They
will reduce production cutting jobs and possibly closing plants. Protecting the local steel industry from
foreign competition means the orders, jobs and plants are preserved.
EV:
• consumers might suffer from higher prices and less choice
• foreign countries could retaliate by imposing trade restrictions on
exports, leading to a loss of jobs in the domestic economy
To raise revenue
A tariff is a tax on imported goods. (also called an import duty or a customs duty).
For some developing countries tariff revenue is an important source of income for the government
-partly because relatively easy to collect compared to other taxes.
-other taxes, e.g. income tax, will raise relatively low levels of revenue in developing countries
EV:
• Tariff might raise cost for domestic firms and affect their profits-> less domestic taxes are collected
Anti-dumping
Dumping can be defined as the sale of goods below their cost of production,
whether marginal cost, average total cost, or average variable cost.
EV:
effects of dumping depend on
• Duration: The impact on employment should be limited if dumping is only a short-term phenomenon.
• whether domestic producers are driven out or also cut their prices
• Magnitude: scale of dumping
might be more efficient to subsidise domestic industries
To correct a deficit on the current account of the
balance of payments
protectionism -> reduce the value of imports or increase the value of exports -> correcting a
deficit on the current account of the balance of payments.
EV:
It depends on the:
• price elasticity of demand
• degree of trade protection
• whether and to what extent trading partners retaliate
EV:
This might add to domestic costs if these strategic products are used in the production of other goods
A tariff, by imposing a tax on a good, is likely to raise its final price to the consumer.
A rise in the price -> a fall in demand and the volume of imports will fall -> some
consumers will switch consumption from imported goods to domestically produced
substitutes following the imposition of a tariff-> A tariff help domestic producers to
increase revenue.
Activity:
Try to draw a graph where foreign trade exist.
with foreign trade, world producers are assumed to be prepared to supply any
amount of the product at a fixed price.
Effects of imposing a tariff:
If the world price of a good is OP a tariff of PQ will shift the supply curve upwards from S world to
Swith tarif. Domestic consumption will fall by MN while domestic production will rise by JK. Imports
will fall from JN to KM.
Tax revenue:
Deadweight loss:
Evaluative comments:
• Effects of a tariff depend on:
- elasticities of demand for imports and supply of domestic products
- the degree of the tariff
Deadweight loss:
For example, the Boeing has on many occasions accused European governments of
subsidising Airbus. (European governments want to support a strong aircraft manufacturing
base in Europe to create exports and jobs)
• Governments can reduce imports by giving subsidies to domestic firms that compete with
imports- almost always indirect subsidies rather than direct subsidies
e.g. Governments but give cheap loans or tax breaks on investment to domestic steel
producers to allow them to compete more effectively with steel imports.
- Domestic subsidies are hard for WTO to tackle because they are not overt protectionism
Other types of non-tariff barriers
Administrative barriers
• Imposing product standards that differ from those in other countries
• Putting red tape on imports such as licenses, designated ports or airports,
months to clear paperwork
Producers
• Domestic firms can both gain and suffer from protectionism. If their domestic markets are
threatened by imports, then protectionist policies can help keep out imports. This means higher
output, higher sales and higher profits.
• Equally, if they benefit from measures to encourage exports, then their output and profits should
be higher. However, overtime domestic producers could become even less internationally
competitive as the incentive to innovate and productive efficiency falls.
• Other domestic firms could also suffer. If tariffs are imposed increased cost for some firms.
Workers Help to maintain jobs in the short-term.
However, workers in the long term would be better off if production did close down as a result of foreign
competition. The market would reallocate resources into industries where the country was able to
compete. New jobs would be created.
Living standards Protectionism in the short term may protect living standards. However, if it leads to a
less efficient, slower growing economy in the long run, then there will be a negative impact on living
standards.
Equality Trade union members ->higher wages->protectionist policies may create greater equality where
unionised jobs are threatened.
It raises small farmers’ incomes which are often low because they are too small and inefficient->create a
more equal distribution of income.
However, these benefits are likely to be short-term benefits. If protectionism leads to lower growth, over
time workers are likely to lose out in absolute terms even if in relative terms they have maintained their
incomes
FREE TRADE VS PROTECTIONISM
Supporters of free trade argue that it leads to a more efficient allocation of resources between
countries,allowing for specialisation. It also encourages competition between producers, reducing
costs of production and leading to innovation and greater choice for consumers; this leads to both
static and dynamic efficiencies.
“The risk of a trade war between the US and China was particularly high in 2018. The US said that it
wanted to reduce its large trade deficit with China. The US believed that this deficit was in part due to
unfair practices used by China. US businesses operating in China had long complained about
intellectual property theft and forced technology transfers. The state support of industries in China,
such as aluminium and steel, was also a cause for concern, as well as claims of currency
manipulation of the renminbi. The US president said he wanted to protect US jobs.”