Comparing Waterfall and Agile

Methodologies
 Waterfall Methodology
• Pros:
• 1. Clear project scope from the start.
• 2. Well-defined stages and milestones.
• 3. Easier to manage and control.
• Cons:
• 1. Limited flexibility for changes.
• 2. Long development cycles may lead to delays.
• 3. Testing happens late in the process.
 Agile Methodology
• Pros:
• 1. Flexibility to adapt to changes.
• 2. Continuous user involvement and feedback.
• 3. Quicker release of usable increments.
• Cons:
• 1. Complex management and coordination.
• 2. Requires active and consistent communication.
• 3. May lack well-defined project scope initially.
 Methodology Comparison
• Waterfall and Agile methodologies offer different approaches to project management:
• - Waterfall is suitable for projects with well-defined requirements and limited changes.
• - Agile is effective for projects with evolving requirements and frequent collaboration.
 Conclusion
• The choice between Waterfall and Agile depends on project specifics.
• Consider factors such as project complexity, customer involvement, and desired
flexibility.