Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Case Analysis Group 2
Case Analysis Group 2
2 BSA - 1
Cadaño, Ma. Fatima Audrey F.
Caluna, Conrad Joemar M.
Carpio, Jhaszvan Madison R.
Cuya, Julian Vic S.
Daga, Jaira C.
Dela Cruz, Michelle Mae U.
Fadrilan, Kenneth Lorenz
ABSTRACT
This study aims to provide insights into the ethical challenges and dilemmas arising from tax avoidance, emphasizing the
importance of balancing the advantages of tax avoidance with addressing these ethical concerns. The researchers conducted a
survey among 24 random students and 6 professors of a certain university divided into two(2) stratas; Strata A is composed of
12 students and 3 professors that are studying/studied tax related courses and Strata B is composed of 12 students and 3
professors that are not studying/did not studied tax related courses to address the moral and ethical considerations of tax
avoidance. Researchers concluded that students and professors perceive tax avoidance more from a moral standpoint than deep
knowledge. Most recognize its legality but lack understanding of how it works, which is by involving and taking advantage of
laws to lower tax obligations. Respondents hold diverse views, acknowledging legality and fairness yet raising ethical
concerns, especially about fairness and societal impact. Despite varied acceptance levels, awareness of its ethical implications
strongly influences respondents' attitudes towards tax avoidance.
Group 2 | Case Analysis | 02
INTRODUCTION
Tax avoidance, as defined by Tabag, involves legally minimizing tax liability within the bounds of tax laws through strategies
such as utilizing incentives, exemptions, and deductions. It is considered lawful and legitimate, requiring adherence to existing
tax laws in good faith and at arm's length. Unlike tax evasion, tax avoidance is not illegal. However, debates on its ethics arise,
with concerns that exploiting legal loopholes may be perceived as not contributing a fair share to society. Tax policies are often
revised to address these concerns and promote a more equitable distribution of the tax burden (TABAG, 2023, 35; Lacy, 2022).
Group 2 | Case Analysis | 03
BACKGROUND OF THE
STUDY
Attitudes toward tax avoidance have evolved over time, attracting considerable academic and public attention. The ethical
dimensions of tax avoidance are crucial in contemporary economic and ethical discussions. A study emphasizes the need for ethical
considerations in teaching basic tax concepts at the higher education level, revealing a lack of awareness among students and staff
about taxation fundamentals. Stakeholder involvement and addressing ethical issues are deemed vital for enhancing the design and
implementation of tax-related education, particularly focusing on tax evasion and tax avoidance. Exploring the perceptions of
students and professors regarding the ethical aspects of tax avoidance is a significant area of study, holding societal and academic
value (Cadsby et al., 2023).
Group 2 | Case Analysis | 04
RESEARCH PROBLEMS
To understand how college students and professors perceive ethical considerations of Tax
Avoidance as a way to decrease or avoid tax obligations, the researchers introduces the following
questions:
01
To what extent are the students and professors aware of the ethical implications associated with tax avoidance?
02
How do the students and professors perceive tax avoidance?
03
What factors contribute to the acceptance or rejection of tax avoidance as an ethically justifiable action among the
students and professors?
Group 2 | Case Analysis | 05
SIGNIFICANCE OF THE
STUDY
Professors: This research will provide Students: This research will benefit Future Researchers: This paper can
information about the awareness and students by raising awareness about serve as an additional reference to
understanding of ethical ethical considerations surrounding tax have a deeper understanding and to
considerations related to Tax avoidance, enabling them to make develop further investigation about
Avoidance among the Professors. This informed decisions in their personal the perspective of Students about the
information can help educators create and professional lives.It develops a Ethical consideration of Tax
lessons that highlight making moral sense of accountability and critical Avoidance.
decisions when handling finances as thinking about the ethical effects of
well as to their tax obligations. financial behaviors.
| Case Analysis |
SCOPE AND
DELIMITATION
OVERVIEW
This study focuses on the extent of understanding of the with regard to the ethical implications associated with Tax Avoidance. The
data collection will be conducted to the students and professors of a certain university who will represent the population.
PROPONENTS
This study will not cover other problems that are not considered as questions related to the ethical implications on Tax Avoidance.
Each of the respondents is given the same questionnaires to answer. The results of this study will be applicable only to the
respondents of this study and will not be used as a measurement to the knowledge of students about the topic who do not belong to
the population of this study. The main source of data will be the questionnaire, which is prepared by the researchers.
Group 2 | Case Analysis | 07
ETHICAL CONSIDERATIONS
DEFINITION OF the concepts and procedures that researchers must
adhere to in order to make sure that their studies
METHODOLOGY
RESEARCH DESIGN
Researchers employed a descriptive case study as the research design, concentrating on participants' perceptions and
awareness of information related to tax avoidance. The study specifically explores the ethical aspects of tax avoidance,
particularly how it operates, and its impact on individuals such as business owners and companies who benefit from reduced
tax obligations. Data was collected using survey questionnaires to gauge participants' perspectives on tax avoidance.
RESEARCH ENVIRONMENT
This study is conducted among the students and professors of a certain university. Online platforms were used to deliver
survey questions for them to complete.
Group 2 | Case Analysis | 12
RESEARCH RESPONDENTS
The respondents of the study are among the college level students and professors of a certain university The researchers used
stratified random sampling in choosing the respondents. Stratified random sampling is a method of sampling used to select a
representative sample from a population. It involves dividing the population into homogeneous subgroups called “strata”
based on certain characteristics that are relevant to the study. Therefore, each college-level student and professor in the
university has an equal chance of being selected and being part of the research. The researchers chose this type of sampling as
it is an effective way to avoid any form of sampling bias. (Beer, 2023)
RESEARCH INSTRUMENT
To get the appropriate data needed, the researchers provided survey questionnaires among the students and professors of a
certain university. The survey questionnaire contains questions relating to the perspective of the students and the professors
regarding tax avoidance. It contains open-ended questions that allow respondents to answer it based on their understanding
and give them the freedom to express themselves freely. Their responses/feedback determined how they perceive the ethical
challenges and concerns associated with arguments on tax avoidance.
Group 2 | Case Analysis | 13
GATHERING OF DATA
In order to gather important data needed and to be able to complete the research, the researchers formulated a survey
questionnaire for the respondents which will be conducted between the last week of November and the first week of December
of 2023. The researchers request the consent and approval of the students and/or the professors that serve as participants in this
research before proceeding to answering the survey questionnaire that the researchers will be providing. After the approval of
the request, the researchers will provide an online link to be used as the platform where the respondents will answer the survey
questionnaire. After collecting the questionnaires, the researchers will tally, and analyze their responses to answer the research
questions.
Group 2 | Case Analysis | 14
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS
1. What is the profile of the respondents of the university in terms of:
1.1 University Role; the majority of the respondents are students.
1.2 Year Level; the majority of the respondents are second year students.
1.3 Program; Majority of the respondents are from courses other than BS Accountancy but among
all the programs, most respondents came from BS Accountancy.
1.4 Academic Involvement in Tax related subjects; majority of the respondents are not enrolled nor
teaching in any subject related to tax.
1.5 Informations related to Tax Avoidance; most of the respondents are only aware of some of the
information presented in the survey.
Group 2 | Case Analysis | 15
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS
2. Perception of the respondents regarding the legality of Tax Avoidance
2.1 The majority of the respondents are aware that Tax Avoidance is legal.
Group 2 | Case Analysis | 16
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS
3. Perception of the respondents regarding how Tax Avoidance works in terms of:
3.1 Limitation; the majority of the respondents are aware of one of the limitation of tax avoidance
which is the exaggeration of business expenses.
3.2 How it actually works; the majority of the respondents are not aware how tax avoidance works,
which is by taking advantage of the law that can reduce the taxpayer’s obligation.
Group 2 | Case Analysis | 17
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS
4. Perception of the respondents on tax avoidance in terms of:
4.1 Social Responsibility; majority of the respondents perceive tax avoidance as an equivalent of
evading social responsibility while a handful are on neutral standing in this matter.
4.2 Employment of PWD and Senior Citizen as a way of tax avoidance; majority of the
respondents perceives this type of employment as a way of tax avoidance while a handful are on
neutral standing in this matter.
4.3 Fairness; majority of the respondents perceives tax avoidance as a fair way of reducing a
taxpayer's obligation while a handful are on neutral standing in this matter.
4.4 Legality; majority of the respondents perceive the legality of tax avoidance to stay as it is,
which is a legal way to reduce taxpayer’s obligation while a handful are on neutral standing in this
matter.
Group 2 | Case Analysis | 18
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS
5. Perception of the respondents on taxpayers that avoid their taxes.
5.1 Majority of the respondents don’t blame this type of taxpayers
Group 2 | Case Analysis | 19
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS
6. Perception of the respondents regarding the Ethical Implications of Tax Avoidance.
6.1 The majority of the respondents perceives that the number 1 ethical implication of tax
avoidance is that it is unfair, secondly is that it hurts the trust of the people to the government's
enforcement of government law and by doing so it is somehow hurting the society.
Group 2 | Case Analysis | 20
CONCLUSION
The majority of students and professors are aware of tax avoidance as legal but not fully aware of its ethical
implications. They perceive it as unfair, a breach of trust in government enforcement, and negatively impacting
society. However, a significant proportion sees it as equivalent to evading social responsibility. The acceptance or
rejection of tax avoidance is influenced by factors such as fairness, belief in its legality, and awareness of its
implications. Academic involvement and information about tax-related subjects also influence the stance taken.
Group 2
RECOMMENDATIONS
STUDENTS INSTRUCTORS AND FUTURE SOCIETY
Learners should explore EDUCATIONAL RESEARCHERS AND Tax evasion involves exploiting
academic journals, articles, INSITUTIONS ACADEMICS loopholes or violating laws to
and reputable resources to Research on ethical reduce tax burden. To maintain
understand tax avoidance Educational institutions can
implications of tax avoidance a fair society, follow tax rules.
perspectives. They should enhance students' ethical
in education is crucial for Consult a certified tax expert or
also understand legal and education on tax avoidance by
taxpayers' understanding. financial advisor for legal
ethical aspects, distinguishing providing training, workshops,
Collaboration between advice and guidance on tax
between tax avoidance and and lectures by experts in law
researchers, educators, planning.
evasion, and reflect on their and tax ethics, ensuring accurate
legislators, and professionals
own views to enhance their and relevant information and
is needed to develop thorough
understanding. practical application of tax
information on this issue.
strategies.
Group 2 Finish
THANK YOU