Professional Documents
Culture Documents
PAWAN SAPKOTA
A CASE OF
MBBS, MS (BPKIHS)
BHARATPUR HOSPITAL
CHOLEDOCHAL
CYST
SEQUENCE OF FLOW
• Case introduction
• Discussions
• Conclusions
• References
CASE INTRODUCTION..
• 10 Y/M
• complaints of: pain over right upper quadrant of abdomen for 1 day,
MRCP:
• Liver is normal in size. Normal signal intensity of liver parenchyma is seen. No evidence
of IHBRD noted. No mass lesion seen.
• Gall bladder is well distended with normall wall thickness. Minimal sludge isn noted in
GB lumen. Fusiform dilation of the extrahepatic CBD measuring 6.9 x 4.5 cm is seen. No
evidence of filling defects noted within lumen of CBD. Likely choledochal cyst IA
• Pancreas is normal in size. Normal parenchymal intensity seen.
OT PROCEDURE
• Ultrasonography
• Technectium-99 HIDA scan
• Ct cholangiography : sensitivity 90% (48)
• MRCP- sensitivity 90-100% (49)
MANAGEMENT RATIONALE (NEW)
• Hepaticoenterostomy vs Cystenterostomy
• MC complications- anastomotic leakage, anastomotic stricture (2.5-17%) and cholangitis (23-
40%) (68)
• Perioperative morbidity in adult and children (35.1% vs 16.3%) (36)
• Adult: Seroma (3.1%), wound infection (9.7%), perihepatic abscess (7.7%)
• Children: anastomotic leaks(3%) and gastrointestinal tract perforation (3%) (36)
• Laparoscopic vs open procedure
• For stricture, balloon dilation should be first step; success rate 81% (69)
• Long term follow-up warranted
• Malignant degeneration more often in type I and IV cysts (46)
• Biliary cancer reported in 5-10% of patients
• After complete surgical excision- 0.7-5.4%
• 5 year survival rate: 95.5% (adults 94.6%; children 97.2%) (36)
FOLLOW-UP
• Lifelong follow-up with USG, liver profile and CA19-9 annually recommended
• AST every 4 months for 2 years; then every 6 months for 5 years (46)
CONCLUSIONS
1. Witcombe JB, Cremin BJ. The width of the common bile duct in childhood. Pediatric Radiology. 1978;7:147-149
3. Jung SM, Seo JM, Lee SK. The relationship between biliary amylase and the clinical features of Choledochal cysts in
pediatric patients. World Journal of Surgery. 2012;36:2098-210
4. Shah OJ, Shera AH, Zargar SA, et al. Choledochal cysts in children and adults with contrasting profiles: 11-year experience
at a tertiary care center in Kashmir. World Journal of Surgery. 2009;33:2403-2411
5. Soares KC, Kim Y, Spolverato G, et al. Presentation and clinical outcomes of Choledochal cysts in children and adults: A
multi-institutional analysis. JAMA Surgery. 2015;150(6):577-58
6. Huang CS, Huang CC, Chen DF. Choledochal cysts: Differences between pediatric and adult patients. Journal of
Gastrointestinal Surgery. 2010;14:1105-1110
7. Lam W, Lam TP, Saing H. Cholangiography and CT cholangiography of pediatric patients
with choledochal cysts. AJR. American Journal of Roentgenology. 1999;173:401-405
8. Ndoye NA, Wellé IB, Cissé L, Guèye D, Diouf C, Mbaye PA, et al. Choledochal cyst in
children in Dakar: Diagnostic and therapeutic aspects. African Journal of Paediatric Surgery.
2021;18(3):168-170
9. Wiseman K, Buczkowski AK, Chung SW, Francoeur J, Schaeffer D, Scudamore CH.
Epidemiology, presentation, diagnosis, and outcomes of choledochal cysts in adults in an
urban environment. American Journal of Surgery. 2005;189(5):527-531
• thankyou