Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Measuring National Income & Output
Measuring National Income & Output
MODULE – A
Macroeconomic Environment
of Business
Measures of Overall Economic
Activity
- Measuring National Income &
Output
Prof. (Dr.) D N Panigrahi
PhD (Finance), MBA (Fin-FMS, DU), CFA & MS-Finance, CAIIB & DFS, M.Sc. (Physics)
Measures of Overall Economic (Business) Activity
You may have noticed that we often refer to the ‘value’ of output. Why
speak in terms of values, and not in terms of quantities, as we did in
microeconomics?
The answer is that in macroeconomics we must find a way to add up
quantities of output of hundreds of thousands of different goods and
services. Yet how can we add up quantities of computers, apples, cars and
theatre tickets? What unit of measurement can we use?
To get around this difficulty, we measure output in money terms, or the
value of goods and services. The ‘value’ of a good is simply its quantity
multiplied by its price. Sometimes ‘value’ may not be explicitly mentioned.
For example, one may speak of ‘the level of aggregate output’ or simply
‘aggregate output’.
Whatever is the case, in macroeconomics output is always in value terms.
How Economic Activity is Measured
There are three ways to measure the value of aggregate output, suggested
by the circular flow of income model, all giving rise to the same result:
• the expenditure approach adds up all spending to buy final goods and
services produced within a country over a time period
• the income approach adds up all income earned by the factors of
production that produce all goods and services within a country over a time
period
• the output (or Product/Production) approach calculates the value of all
final goods and services produced in a country over a time period.
Thus, aggregate (national) output and income can be calculated in three
different ways, which should all result in the same figure. These three
methods are illustrated in the simplified circular flow of income shown in
Fig 26.15 below.
Fig. 26.15 – 3 Methods of Measuring National Income
Measuring National Income: The Expenditure Approach
The income approach adds up all income earned by the four factors of
production in the course of producing total output within a country over a
time period (usually a year): wages earned by labour, rent earned by land,
interest earned by capital, and profits earned by entrepreneurship.
When all factor incomes are added up, the result is national income.
Whereas national income is another measure of the level of overall
economic activity, it is not the same as GDP. To calculate GDP using the
income approach, it is necessary to make some adjustments to national
income.
So, National Income = Sum of all Factor Incomes = Rent + Wages +
Interest + Profit.
Do not include transfer payments.
Measuring National Income: The Income Approach
The output (product) approach measures the value of each good and service
(PxQ) produced in the economy over a particular time period (usually a
year) and then sums them up to obtain the total value of all final goods and
services (output produced) which is equal to GDP.
It includes the value of all final goods and services, in order to avoid the
double counting that would arise from including the values of intermediate
goods and services.
The method used to obtain the value of only final goods and services is to count
only the value added in each step of the production process. For example, say the
production of a good goes through the following steps. Firm A sells raw materials
for $700 to firm B. Firm B uses the raw materials and produces an intermediate
good that it sells to firm C for $1100. Firm C uses this intermediate good to
produce a final good that it sells for $1700.
Measuring National Income: The Output (Product) Approach
How much value has been added in this process? Firm A added $700 of
value. Firm B added $400 of value (= $1100 − $700), and firm C added
$600 of value (= $1700 − $1100). When we add these up we obtain: $700 +
$400 + $600 = $1700.
Note that the sum of the values that were added in each step of the
production process is exactly equal to the value of the final product.
If we had added up the values of the two intermediate products and the
final product, we would have: $700 + $1100 + $1700 = $3500, which
greatly exaggerates the value of the product due to double counting. By
counting only values added in each step of the production process, the
problem of double counting is avoided.
Measuring National Income: The Output (Product) Approach
1 Why are the terms ‘national income’ and ‘aggregate output’ often used
interchangeably?
2 Why is it useful to know the value of aggregate output?
3 Explain why (a) we measure aggregate output in value terms, and (b) we
count only the value of final goods and services when measuring the value
of output.
4 What are the four expenditure components of GDP? Explain each of
these.
5 (a) Explain three ways that GDP can be measured. (b) Why do they give
rise to the same result?
GDP Computation: Summary
The value added of a firm is its total revenue less its purchases from
other firms. This is equal to the incomes earned by the factors used in
its production process, i.e. wages, interest, rent and profit.
The expenditure method adds up all actual expenditure on
domestically produced output (and includes stock under investment).
Expenditure is calculated at market prices.
Market prices are higher than basic prices where there are taxes on
products, such as VAT/GST, and are lower than basic prices where
there are subsidies on products.
So, GDP = GVA + Taxes on Products – Subsidies on products
Chart on 3-Ways of Calculating a Nation’s GDP
Distinctions relating to measures of the value of output:
Distinction between GDP and GNI/GNP
Distinguish between GDP (Gross Domestic Product) and GNP/GNI
(Gross National Product or Income) as measures of economic activity.
We learned that the value of output produced in an economy is equal to
the total income generated in producing that output. However, in the real
world, this equality does not always hold.
Sometimes the output of an economy is produced by factors of
production that belong to foreigners. Consider the case where a United
States multinational firm in India remits (sends back) its profits to the
United States. The output of the multinational is produced in India, but
the profit income is received by residents in the United States.
Does the profit income count as Indian or US income and output?
Distinctions relating to measures of the value of output:
Distinction between GDP and GNI/GNP
Consider also a Russian worker who lives and works in Spain, and
sends a large part of her income to her family in Russia. Her output is
produced in Spain, but the income she sends home is Russian income;
should this income count as Russia’s or Spain’s income and output?
The concepts ‘domestic’ and ‘national’ are used to distinguish
between measures of aggregate output and income that deal with this
issue.
The term ‘domestic’ in ‘gross domestic product’ means that output
has been produced by factors of production within the country,
regardless of who owns them (the factors of production) (residents or
foreigners).
Distinctions relating to measures of the value of output:
Distinction between GDP and GNI/GNP
The term ‘national’ is used in another measure of aggregate output
known as gross national income (GNI or GNY) (formerly known as
gross national product (GNP)).
The term ‘national’ in GNI means that the income it measures is the
income of the country’s residents, regardless where this income
comes from (where the factors of production owned by the residents
are located).
In the example above, the profit income remitted to the United States
is included in Indian GDP because it is created by production taking
place in India, but it is part of United States GNI because it is income
received by United States’ residents.
Distinctions relating to measures of the value of output:
Distinction between GDP and GNI/GNP
For the Russian worker in Spain, the value of her output is included in
Spain’s GDP, but her income sent to Russia is part of Russia’s GNI.
GDP is the total value of all final goods and services produced
within a country over a time period (usually a year), regardless of
who owns the factors of production.
GNI (or GNP) is the total income received by the residents of a
country, equal to the value of all final goods and services produced
by the factors of production supplied by the country’s residents
regardless where the factors are located.
Gross national income (GNI) is increasing in importance as a
measure. GNI is included, for instance, by the United Nations in its
Human Development Index.
Distinctions relating to measures of the value of output:
Distinction between GDP and GNI/GNP
GNI goes further than GDP in changing the focus from output
produced in a country to income earned by the country’s residents and
firms regardless of where it is earned.
GDP (the value of output produced within a country) is likely to differ
from the GNI (total income received by the residents of a country)
because incomes of factors of production usually flows across the
international boundaries. Therefore the income received may be
greater or lower than the value of the output produced.
So, GNI = GDP + Factor Incomes received from Abroad - Factor
Incomes sent Abroad = GDP + Net Factor Incomes from Abroad
(NFIA).
Distinctions relating to measures of the value of output:
Distinction between GDP and GNI/GNP
NFIA is also known as Net (Foreign) Income from abroad or Net
Property Income from abroad.
NFIA includes all factor incomes like remittances, profit of MNCs
repatriated, interest and dividends received on assets (investments).
GDP is a better measure of the value of aggregate output produced in
a country than GNI (GNP).
GNI (GNP) is a better measure of the amount of aggregate income
earned by the residents of a country than GDP.
Net income from abroad is included in GNI but not GDP. If there is no
property income from abroad, the two measures would be equal.
Both measures are adjusted for indirect taxes and subsidies.
Transfer payments are not included in either measure.
Distinctions relating to measures of the value of output:
Distinction between GDP and GNI/GNP
Factor Incomes Received from Abroad is Factor Incomes Sent Abroad is likely to
likely to include include
Incomes received by the domestic residents Wages of foreign workers working
sent to them by their relatives working domestically sent to their relatives back home
abroad (known as inward remittances) (outward remittances)
• Population growth: Changes in the size of GDP per capita over time
depend very much on the relationship between growth in total GDP and
growth in population. In general, if total GDP increases faster than the
population, then GDP per capita increases. But if the country’s population
increases faster than total GDP, then GDP per capita falls.
Total measures of the value of output and income (such as GDP and
GNI), provide a summary statement of the overall size of an economy.
Per capita figures [Per Capita GDP = Total GDP/Population and Per
Capita GNI = Total GNI/Population] are useful as a summary measure
of the standard of living in a country, because they provide an indication
of how much of total output or income in the economy corresponds to each
person in the population on average.
Distinction between Gross and Net
1 (a) Define GDP and GNI, and explain how they differ. (b) Think of
some examples of countries where (i) GNI is likely to be larger than
GDP, and (ii) GDP is likely to be larger than GNI.
2 Why do price changes over time pose a problem when we want to
make comparisons of GDP (or any measure of output or income) over
time?
3 Explain the difference between nominal GDP and real GDP (or
nominal and real GNI).
4 Why is it important to use real values when making comparisons
over time?
Test your understanding 8.3
The answer is that we cannot be sure. There are two reasons why this
is so. One is that national income statistics (or statistical data used to
measure national income and output and other measures of economic
performance) do not accurately measure the ‘true’ value of output
produced in an economy.
The other is that standards of living are closely related to a variety of
factors that GDP and GNI are unable to account for.
As a result, per capita figures of both GDP and GNI may be
misleading when used to make comparisons over time or
comparisons between countries, and when used as the basis for
standard of living conclusions.
Why per capita figures of GDP & GNI may be misleading
GDP/GNI may Underestimate GDP/GNI may Overestimate GDP/GNI may Under- or Over-
Standards of Living because they Standards of Living because they estimate Standards of Living
because they
Do not include the output sold in the Do not take into account the value of Disregard what output consists of
underground (informal) economy negative externalities that reduce the (Ex.: high military goods output and
(Ex.: Unreported Income of a standard of living (Ex.: Pollution) low merit goods output or the
Plumber) reverse)
Do not include the output that is Not
sold in the Market (Ex.: Food grown
for own Consumption)
Do not take into account the Do not take into account the Disregard the distribution of Income
improvements in the quality of goods destruction of natural resources (Ex.: (Ex.: high Income Inequality or low
and services (Ex.: Improved Forests, Wildlife, Soil Quality) Income Inequality)
Computers)
Do not take into account the Disregard differing price levels in
standard of living factors (Ex.: Level different countries (Ex.: $100 of
of Education, Health and Life output translates into more output in
Expectancy) a low price country than in a high
price country)
Test your understanding 8.4
Examining the changes in real GDP that occurred between 2001 and
2003, we find that real GDP increased from 2001 to 2002 (from £881
to £976), but decreased between 2002 and 2003, falling from £976 to
£941.
Note that real GDP fell in 2002–03 even as nominal GDP increased
over the same period (from £1,160 to £1,223); price increases caused
nominal GDP to rise, while falling quantities meant that real GDP
was falling.
(Note that in the base year, 2001, nominal GDP is equal to real GDP;
this is always so for the base year since real GDP is valued at base
year prices.)
Nominal GDP –Vs- Real GDP
In the real world, the above method of converting nominal values into real
values is extremely lengthy and complicated, as there are hundreds of
thousands of products whose values must be measured. However, this is
not a problem because economists use short-cut methods that take the form
of price indices.
A price index is a measure of average prices in one period relative to
average prices in a base year. A price index commonly used to convert
nominal GDP to real GDP is a price deflator known as the GDP deflator:
GDP deflator = (nominal GDP/real GDP) × 100
Statistical services derive the GDP deflator by using the values of nominal
and real GDP they have already calculated (by the method in Table 8.2):
Understanding how the GDP Deflator is derived
GDP deflator in 2001 = (881/881) × 100 = 100.0
GDP deflator in 2002 = (1160/976) × 100 = 118.8
GDP deflator in 2003 = (1223/941) × 100 = 130.0
These results are summarised in Table 8.3.
Note that the GDP deflator is 100.0 for 2001. The index number for the base year
is always equal to 100, for all indices. This follows from the equality of nominal
and real GDP in 2001, as we had selected 2001 to be the base year.
Table 8.3 Nominal & Real GDP and GDP Deflator
Year Nominal GDP Real GDP GDP Deflator
We can see that whereas prices on average increased in the period 2004–7,
in 2008 they fell. We can also see that the base year is 2006. Note that it is
possible for some years to have a price index that is less than 100.0, which
means simply that in those years, the average price level was lower than in
the base year.
Test Your Understanding 8.6
1 Calculate nominal GDP, given the following information from the national
accounts of Flatland for the year 2007 (all figures are in billion Ftl, the national
currency). Consumer spending = 125; government spending = 46; investment
spending = 35; exports of goods and services = 12; imports of goods and services
= 17.
2 Now suppose that profits of foreign multinational corporations in Flatland and
incomes of foreign workers in Flatland that were sent home in 2007 were Ftl 3.7
billion. The profits of Flatland’s multinational corporations abroad and income of
Flatland workers abroad that were sent back to Flatland were Ftl 4.5 billion. What
was Flatland’s GNI in 2007?
3 You read in one source of information that real GDP in a hypothetical country
in 2001 was $243 billion; in another source of information you read that real GDP
in 2002 was $277 billion. What information do you need to be sure that the two
figures can be compared with each other?
Test Your Understanding 8.6
4 You are given the following information on an imaginary country called
Lakeland.
Year 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010
• Nominal and real GDP, GDP & GNI, NDP & NNI,
GDP Deflator, Net Exports, Product (Output)
Method, Expenditure Method, Income Method, Per
Capita GDP/GNI, Green GDP
66