Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Chapter 7
Interest Groups and
Business Power
Copyright © 2022, 2020, 2018 Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved
Learning Objectives
7.1 Compare and contrast opposing viewpoints about the
role of interest groups in a democracy.
7.2 Describe different types of interest groups.
7.3 Explain why interest groups form and proliferate.
7.4 Analyze the methods and activities interest groups use
to influence political outcomes.
7.5 Describe the inequalities of the interest group system.
7.6 Assess the effectiveness of regulations designed to
control interest groups.
Copyright © 2022, 2020, 2018 Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved
Crippling the Environmental
Protection Agency
Copyright © 2022, 2020, 2018 Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved
Learning Objective 7.1
Copyright © 2022, 2020, 2018 Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved
Interest Groups in a Democratic
Society: Contrasting Viewpoints
Copyright © 2022, 2020, 2018 Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved
The Evils-of-Faction Argument
Warning by Madison in The Federalist No. 10
Why are interest groups dangerous?
■ Self-interested
■ No regard for public interest
■ Examples, according to critics of the groups
Copyright © 2022, 2020, 2018 Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved
The Bosses of the Senate
Copyright © 2022, 2020, 2018 Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved
Journal 7.1: Bosses of the Senate
Copyright © 2022, 2020, 2018 Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved
The Pluralist Argument
Interest groups benefit democracy
■ Elections not specific enough
■ Easy to create, free to join
■ Power dispersed, easy to access
■ Highly democratic
Copyright © 2022, 2020, 2018 Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved
Figure 7.1 The Pluralist View of
American Politics
Copyright © 2022, 2020, 2018 Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved
Learning Objective 7.2
Copyright © 2022, 2020, 2018 Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved
The Universe of Interest Groups
Private Interest Groups
Public Interest Groups
Copyright © 2022, 2020, 2018 Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved
Private Interest Groups
🞑 Types of private interest groups
■ Business
■ Vast resources
■ The professions
■ Well-represented
■ Labour
■ Unions
■ Economic not ideological
■ Decline in membership has weakened power
Copyright © 2022, 2020, 2018 Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved
A Rare Victory of Sorts
Copyright © 2022, 2020, 2018 Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved
Table 7.1 The Diverse World of Interest
Associations (1 of 2)
Private Interest Groups Interest Subtypes Association Examples
Copyright © 2022, 2020, 2018 Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved
Table 7.1 The Diverse World of Interest
Associations (2 of 2)
Public Interest Groups Interest Subtypes Association Examples
Copyright © 2022, 2020, 2018 Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved
Recall Governor Walker
Copyright © 2022, 2020, 2018 Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved
Journal 7.2: Recall Governor Walker
Copyright © 2022, 2020, 2018 Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved
Public Interest Groups
Advocacy groups
■ Ideological motivation
■ Race, ethnicity, gender, sexual orientation
■ Environmental causes or moral issues
■ Professional, paid staff
■ Supported by donations
■ Little membership involvement
Government associations
Nonprofit organizations
Copyright © 2022, 2020, 2018 Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved
Learning Objective 7.3
Copyright © 2022, 2020, 2018 Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved
Interest Group Formation
and Proliferation
The Constitution
Diverse Interests
A More Active Government
Disturbances
Copyright © 2022, 2020, 2018 Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved
Lobbying Gridlock
Copyright © 2022, 2020, 2018 Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved
Journal 7.3: Lobbying Gridlock
Copyright © 2022, 2020, 2018 Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved
The Constitution
First Amendment protections
■ Free speech, press, assembly
■ Right to petition government
Variety of access points
■ Federalism
■ Checks and balances
■ Separation of powers
■ Contrast with unitary system
Copyright © 2022, 2020, 2018 Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved
Diverse Interests
Types of diversity
■ Demographic groups
■ Causes and issue positions on them
■ Complexity of economy
Industry lobbyists
■ Google, Facebook
Copyright © 2022, 2020, 2018 Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved
A More Active Government
Taken on more responsibilities
Far more regulation today
■ Financial industry example
Hypercompetition in the global economy
■ Protectionist policies
Government programs and initiatives
Copyright © 2022, 2020, 2018 Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved
Disturbances
Groups form when interests are threatened
■ Disturbance theory
■ Changes in social or economic environment
Copyright © 2022, 2020, 2018 Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved
Lobbying for Ethanol
Copyright © 2022, 2020, 2018 Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved
Journal 7.4: Lobbying for Ethanol
Copyright © 2022, 2020, 2018 Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved
Pro-Life Youth
Copyright © 2022, 2020, 2018 Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved
Journal 7.5: Pro-Life Youth
Copyright © 2022, 2020, 2018 Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved
Learning Objective 7.4
Copyright © 2022, 2020, 2018 Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved
What Interest Groups Do
The Inside Game
The Outside Game
Copyright © 2022, 2020, 2018 Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved
The Inside Game (1 of 2)
The politics of insiders and ”good ol’ boy”
networks
Bribes versus persuasion
■ Access is critical
■ Lobbyists are former Congress members, staff, bureaucrats
Works best for narrow, technical issues
Copyright © 2022, 2020, 2018 Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved
Staffers to the Rescue
Copyright © 2022, 2020, 2018 Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved
Journal 7.6: Staffers to the Rescue
Copyright © 2022, 2020, 2018 Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved
The Inside Game (2 of 2)
Lobbying Congress
■ Two objectives:
■ Get bills or provisions they favor passed
■ Stop bills or provisions they do not like
■ Financial contributions
Lobbying the executive branch
■ Providing technical information
Lobbying the courts
■ Amicus curiae briefs
■ Involvement in judicial appointments
Copyright © 2022, 2020, 2018 Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved
Planning Strategy
Copyright © 2022, 2020, 2018 Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved
Celebrating a Historic Supreme
Court Decision
Copyright © 2022, 2020, 2018 Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved
The Outside Game
Grassroots lobbying
Mobilizing membership
■ Letters and phone calls
Organizing the district
Shaping public opinion
Getting involved in campaigns and elections
Copyright © 2022, 2020, 2018 Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved
Figure 7.2 Interest Group Report
Cards, a Select Sample
SOURCE: Data from legislative ratings of Americans for Democratic Action, the League of
Conservation Voters, the American Conservative Union, and the National Taxpayers Union.
Copyright © 2022, 2020, 2018 Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved
Critical Thinking 7.1: Interest Group
Report Cards, a Select Sample
Copyright © 2022, 2020, 2018 Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved
The Fox Guarding the Chicken Coop
Copyright © 2022, 2020, 2018 Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved
Journal 7.7: The Fox Guarding
the Chicken Coop
Copyright © 2022, 2020, 2018 Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved
Learning Objective 7.5
Copyright © 2022, 2020, 2018 Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved
Interest Groups, Corporations,
and the Wealthy
Representational Inequality
Resource Inequality
Access Inequality
The Privileged Position of Corporations
Copyright © 2022, 2020, 2018 Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved
Figure 7.3 The Many Ways Privileged
Actors Influence What Government Does
Copyright © 2022, 2020, 2018 Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved
Representational Inequality
Power goes to most organized
■ Lobbying dominated by business interests
■ Labor union clout
Advocacy groups
■ Members and contributors: higher incomes, education than
general public
■ Focus on quality of life issues
Copyright © 2022, 2020, 2018 Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved
Resource Inequality
Business interests dominate
■ Dodd-Frank Bill
Political action committees (PACs)
■ Represent wealthy interests
Citizens United v. FEC (2010)
Copyright © 2022, 2020, 2018 Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved
Two Billion Dollar Losing Bet
Copyright © 2022, 2020, 2018 Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved
Journal 7.8: Two Billion Dollar
Losing Bet
Copyright © 2022, 2020, 2018 Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved
Table 7.2 Major Spending On Federal Lobbying, 2018
(By Industry Sector)
SOURCE: Based on Center for Responsive Politics, Influence and Lobbying, Ranked Sectors, 2018.
Copyright © 2022, 2020, 2018 Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved
Access Inequality
Access to government decision makers
■ Hiring former regulatory staff
Iron triangles
Issue networks
■ Looser, more fluid than iron triangles
Copyright © 2022, 2020, 2018 Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved
Figure 7.4 The Iron Triangle: The Cozy
Politics of Defending America
Copyright © 2022, 2020, 2018 Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved
The Privileged Position
of Corporations
Corporate advantages
■ “The business of America is business”
■ Economic well-being tied to business
■ Too big to fail
■ Mobility results in leverage
Business does not always get its way
■ Environmental, health & safety regulations
Unbeatable political coalitions
■ Cannot be said about any other sector
Copyright © 2022, 2020, 2018 Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved
Figure 7.5 Applying the Framework: How Has
Business Fared on the Roberts Court? (1 of 2)
SOURCE: Lee Epstein, William M. Landes, and Richard A. Posner, “How Business Fares in the Supreme Court,” Minnesota Law Review 97,
no. 1 (2012); Lee Epstein, William M. Landes, and Richard A. Posner, “When It Comes to Business, the Right and Left Sides of the Court
Agree,” University Journal of Law and Policy 54 (September 16, 2013), pp. 33–55. Also see Tom Donnelly, “Roberts at Ten: Chief Justice
Roberts and Big Business,” (Washington, DC: The Constitutional Accountability Center, issue brief, July 30, 2015).
Copyright © 2022, 2020, 2018 Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved
Figure 7.5 Applying the Framework:
Structure
• Constitution: Decisions of Supreme Court, a co-equal
branch of government, are effectively binding public
policy.
• Culture: Small business has always been highly regarded
by Americans, and this sometimes extends to business in
general, even to big companies.
• Economy: The sources of most fortunes in the United
States are tied to stock holding or holding executive
positions in large corporations.
• Economy: Intense global competition influences
American corporations to focus on cost reduction—
especially with respect to wages—and less
accommodation to labor unions.
Copyright © 2022, 2020, 2018 Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved
Figure 7.5 Applying the Framework:
Political Linkage
• Interests: Corporations and other pro-business
interest groups and advocacy organizations like the
U.S. Chamber of Commerce are powerful forces in
Washington.
• Interests: Labor union membership and political
influence in Washington have declined.
• Parties: The Republican Party has long stood for
low taxes, low regulation, and small government.
For a period, Democrats supported tax cuts for
business and deregulation (though that has now
changed).
Copyright © 2022, 2020, 2018 Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved
Figure 7.5 Applying the Framework:
Government
• Presidents and the Senate: Republican presidents
George H. W. Bush, George W. Bush, and Donald
Trump nominated and the Senate confirmed strong
conservatives for Supreme Court vacancies.
Copyright © 2022, 2020, 2018 Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved
Figure 7.5 Applying the Framework:
Action
• Domestic Policy: The Roberts-led Supreme Court
sides with business and against labor unions,
workers, and consumers in a majority of its rulings.
Copyright © 2022, 2020, 2018 Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved
Figure 7.5 Applying the Framework: How Has
Business Fared on the Roberts Court? (2 of 2)
SOURCE: Lee Epstein, William M. Landes, and Richard A. Posner, “How Business Fares in the Supreme Court,” Minnesota Law Review 97,
no. 1 (2012); Lee Epstein, William M. Landes, and Richard A. Posner, “When It Comes to Business, the Right and Left Sides of the Court
Agree,” University Journal of Law and Policy 54 (September 16, 2013), pp. 33–55. Also see Tom Donnelly, “Roberts at Ten: Chief Justice
Roberts and Big Business,” (Washington, DC: The Constitutional Accountability Center, issue brief, July 30, 2015).
Copyright © 2022, 2020, 2018 Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved
Figure 7.6 Effective Tax Rates for the 400
Richest Families in America
SOURCE: Data prior to 2002 are from Thomas Piketty and Emmanuel Saez, “How Progressive Is the
U.S. Federal Tax System?” Working Paper 12404, National Bureau of Economic Research (July
2006), Table A3. All other data are authors’ calculations based on Internal Revenue Service tax rate
tables..
Copyright © 2022, 2020, 2018 Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved
Learning Objective 7.6
Copyright © 2022, 2020, 2018 Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved
Curing the Mischief of Faction
Disclosure
Revolving door
McCain–Feingold and follow-ups
Influence of money continues to increase
Copyright © 2022, 2020, 2018 Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved
Shared Writing (1 of 2)
The federal minimum wage and 40-hour workweek were first introduced in
1938 by Congress under the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA). FDR, president
at the time, claimed the law was “the most far-sighted program for the benefit of
workers ever adopted,” arguing that fair wages ensure a “minimum standard of
living necessary for health, efficiency and general well-being.” The FLSA
established standards affecting employees in the private sector and in
government sectors at all levels, minimum wages, overtime pay, employment
record keeping, and youth employment.
At the time of this writing, workers covered by the federal minimum are entitled
to a wage of not less than $7.25 per hour. Although the federal minimum wage
has been increasing steadily since the end of World War II, it has actually
remained pretty stagnant in real-dollar terms. In fact, today’s $7.25 minimum
federal wage is actually less than it was in the late 1960s in terms of buying
power, after increases in the cost-of-living are factored in.
Copyright © 2022, 2020, 2018 Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved
Shared Writing (2 of 2)
Many states also have minimum wage laws. In 2016, for example, California
passed legislation that will eventually increase the statewide minimum wage to
$15 per hour. Think about state and federal policies regarding minimum-wage
levels in relation to the overall efficiency and strength of the economy, as well
as their impact on U.S. citizens.
Now construct a brief argument for or against this proposition: Increases in the
federal minimum wage would have the effect of increasing the standard of living
for the lowest socioeconomic classes and would not increase the level of
unemployment in the United States. How would you defend your position to a
fellow student? What would be your main line of argument? What evidence do
you believe best supports your position?
Copyright © 2022, 2020, 2018 Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved
Copyright
Copyright © 2022, 2020, 2018 Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved