The document summarizes Section 167 of the CrPC, which deals with procedure for investigation and detention of an accused person. It states that if the investigation cannot be completed within 24 hours of arrest, the accused must be produced before a magistrate within that time. The magistrate may authorize detention for up to 15 days for police custody or beyond in some cases, but after the initial period the accused can only be in judicial custody. It also discusses related case laws and exceptions to the prescribed time periods for investigation and detention.
The document summarizes Section 167 of the CrPC, which deals with procedure for investigation and detention of an accused person. It states that if the investigation cannot be completed within 24 hours of arrest, the accused must be produced before a magistrate within that time. The magistrate may authorize detention for up to 15 days for police custody or beyond in some cases, but after the initial period the accused can only be in judicial custody. It also discusses related case laws and exceptions to the prescribed time periods for investigation and detention.
The document summarizes Section 167 of the CrPC, which deals with procedure for investigation and detention of an accused person. It states that if the investigation cannot be completed within 24 hours of arrest, the accused must be produced before a magistrate within that time. The magistrate may authorize detention for up to 15 days for police custody or beyond in some cases, but after the initial period the accused can only be in judicial custody. It also discusses related case laws and exceptions to the prescribed time periods for investigation and detention.
be completed in 24 hours.- 1. Whenever any person is arrested and detained in custody and it appears that the investigation can’t be completed within 24 hours
→the P.O shall forthwith transmit to the nearest J.M a
copy of the entries in the diary and shall “forward” the accused also 2. The J.M may, whether he has or has no jurisdiction to try the case, from time to time authorize the detention of the accused in such custody as he thinks fit, for a term not exceeding 15 days in the hole
→If such J.M has no jurisdiction to try the case and
considers further detention unnecessary, he may forward the accused to a Magistrate having such jurisdiction In Gautam Navlakha V. National Investigation Agency (May, 2021) Supreme Court has dealt with
→Concept of “House Arrest” and
→Concept of “Transit Remand”
Also see the Section 57 of Cr.P.C
Provided that.-
a) the Magistrate may authorize the detention of the
accused, otherwise than in the custody of police, beyond the period of 15 days, not exceeding a total period of.-
i) 90 days, where investigation relates to an offence
punishable with death, life or imprisonment for not less than 10 years ii) 60 days, in any other offence
→and on the expiry of the said period, the accused shall be
released on bail b) →for police custody accused must be produced in person before the Magistrate
→for judicial custody accused may be produced
in person or through the video conference (w.e.f 2009)
Provided that in case of woman under 18 years of
age, the detention shall be authorized to be in the custody of a remand home or recognised social institution (w.e.f 2009) 2A) if J.M is not available, P.O may transmit the accused to nearest E.M and thereupon such E.M may authorize the detention of the accused in such custody for a term not exceeding 7 days in the aggregate
→and on the expiry of said period, the accused shall be
released on bail or sent to competent J.M
→and where an order for such further detention is made by
J.M, the above period shall be taken into account 3 & 4: Magistrate shall record the reasons for detention in police custody and forward a copy to CJM
In State (Delhi Admn.) v. Dharam Pal (1982 Delhi
H.C) held that “the nature of the custody can be altered from Judicial Custody to Police Custody and vice-versa during the first period of 15 days (or 7 days). After the said period the accused can only be kept in Judicial Custody but not the Custody of Police”. In CBI v. Anupam J. Kulkarni (1992) S.C held that “Police Remand should not be resorted to after 15 days of arrest. Custody after expiry of first 15 days can only be Judicial Custody”.
→but 15 days limit of Police Custody is not applicable
when there is a series of different cases requiring investigation against the same accused →the prescribed statutory period of 90 days or 60 days is to be computed from the date the Magistrate authorizes detention of an accused person
→clear 90 days or 60 days have to expire before the right
begins.
→in computing the period one of the days on either side
has to be excluded as required u/s 9 & 10 of General Clauses Act. →till the Charge-Sheet is filed, the right to bail continues. Once Charge-Sheet is filed right ceases.
→if the accused voluntarily surrenders before the court,
the provisions of Sec. 167 are not applicable. Because in such case, the accused is not “forwarded” by the police to the Magistrate 5: if any case is triable as summons case, the investigation is not conclude in within 6 months from the date of arrest of accused, the Magistrate shall stop further investigation
→if I.O satisfies magistrate, continuation of investigation
may be allowed
6. If investigation is stopped u/sub-section (5), the Sessions
Judge may on an application made to him or otherwise, vacate the order and direct further investigation →an investigation beyond the period of 6 months may not necessarily vitiate proceedings
→non-stopping of investigation would only be curable error
→Magistrate is entitled to ignore the investigation made by
the police beyond 6 months and confine the case with regard to investigation that took place within 6 months