The euro was already envisaged as a goal back at the start of European integration in 1950s. Break-up of the gold standard in the 1970s led to creation of the forerunners of the euro, European Monetary System and Exchange Rate Mechanism. German reunification (1990) and currency crisis of 1992 as catalysts for push toward the euro leading to Maastricht Treaty in 1992 / 93.
The euro was already envisaged as a goal back at the start of European integration in 1950s. Break-up of the gold standard in the 1970s led to creation of the forerunners of the euro, European Monetary System and Exchange Rate Mechanism. German reunification (1990) and currency crisis of 1992 as catalysts for push toward the euro leading to Maastricht Treaty in 1992 / 93.
Copyright:
Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
Available Formats
Download as PPTX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
The euro was already envisaged as a goal back at the start of European integration in 1950s. Break-up of the gold standard in the 1970s led to creation of the forerunners of the euro, European Monetary System and Exchange Rate Mechanism. German reunification (1990) and currency crisis of 1992 as catalysts for push toward the euro leading to Maastricht Treaty in 1992 / 93.
Copyright:
Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
Available Formats
Download as PPTX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
its Future Group Members 516 Tulika Gurung 537 Sharon Nunes 552 Bhavana Sonawane 555 Shivangi Tarai A Brief History of European Economic Integration A Brief History of European Economic Integration The euro was already envisaged as a goal back at the start of European integration in 1950s It was always seen as the ~next logical step after the single market The idea gained academic attention through the work of economist like Robert Mundell (~Optimal Currency Areas) Break-up of the gold standard in the 1970s led to creation of the forerunners of the euro, European Monetary System (EMS) and Exchange Rate Mechanism (ERM) German reunification (1990) and currency crisis of 1992 as catalysts for push toward the euro leading to Maastricht Treaty in 1992/93. A 8r|ef G|ossary of Luronyms WhaL ls Lhe Lu? W 1he Luropean unlon ls a sysLem of lnLernaLlonal lnsLlLuLlons Lhe flrsL of whlch orlglnaLed ln 1937 whlch now represenLs 27 Luropean counLrles Lhrough Lhe followlng bodles Luropean ar||ament elecLed by clLlzens of member counLrles Counc|| of the Luropean Un|on appolnLed by governmenLs of Lhe member counLrles Luropean Comm|ss|on execuLlve body Court of Iust|ce lnLerpreLs Lu law Luropean Centra| 8ank whlch conducLs moneLary pollcy Lhrough a sysLem of member counLry banks called Lhe Luropean System of Centra| 8anks 204 WhaL ls Lhe LMS? W 1he Luropean Monetary System was orlglnally a sysLem of flxed exchange raLes lmplemenLed ln 1979 Lhrough an exchange rate mechan|sm (L8M) W 1he LMS has slnce developed lnLo an econom|c and monetary un|on (LMu) a more exLenslve sysLem of coordlnaLed economlc and moneLary pollcles 1he LMS has replaced Lhe exchange raLe mechanlsm for mosL members wlLh a common currency under Lhe economlc and moneLary unlon 203 1he LMS 19791998 W lrom 1979 Lo 1993 Lhe LMS deflned Lhe exchange raLe mechanlsm Lo allow mosL currencles Lo flucLuaLe +/ 223 around LargeL exchange raLes W 1he exchange raLe mechanlsm allowed larger flucLuaLlons (+/ 6) for currencles of orLugal Spaln 8rlLaln (unLll 1992) and lLaly (unLll 1990) 1hese counLrles wanLed greaLer flexlblllLy wlLh moneLary pollcy 1he wlder bands were also lnLended Lo prevenL speculaLlon caused by dlfferlng moneLary and flscal pollcles 206 1he LMS 19791998 (conL) 1o prevenL speculaLlon W early ln Lhe LMS some excbooqe coottols were also enforced Lo llmlL Lradlng of currencles 8uL from 1987 Lo 1990 Lhese conLrols were llfLed ln order Lo make Lhe Lu a common markeL for flnanclal asseLs W A cteJlt system was also developed among LMS members Lo lend Lo counLrles LhaL needed asseLs and currencles LhaL were ln hlgh demand ln Lhe forelgn exchange markeLs 207 1he LMS 19791998 (conL) W 8uL because of dlfferences ln moneLary and flscal pollcles across Lhe LMS markeL parLlclpanLs began buylng Cerman asseLs (because of hlgh Cerman lnLeresL raLes) and selllng oLher LMS asseLs W As a resulL 8rlLaln lefL Lhe LMS ln 1992 and allowed Lhe pound Lo floaL agalnsL oLher Luropean currencles W As a resulL Lhe exchange raLe mechanlsm was redeflned ln 1993 Lo allow for bands of +/13 of Lhe LargeL value ln order devalue many currencles relaLlve Lo Lhe deuLschemark 208 1he LMS 19791998 (conL) W 8uL evenLually each LMS member adopLed slmllarly resLralned flscal and moneLary pollcles and Lhe lnflaLlon raLes ln Lhe LMS evenLually converged (and speculaLlon slowed or sLopped) ln effecL LMS members were followlng Lhe resLralned moneLary pollcles of Cermany whlch has LradlLlonally had low lnflaLlon under Lhe LMS exchange raLe mechanlsm of flxed bands Cermany was exporLlng" lLs moneLary pollcy 209 Membershlp of Lhe Lu W 1o be a member of Lhe Lu a counLry musL among oLher Lhlngs 1 have low barrlers LhaL llmlL Lrade and flows of flnanclal asseLs 2 adopL common rules for emlgraLlon and lmmlgraLlon Lo ease Lhe movemenL of people 3 esLabllsh common workplace safeLy and consumer proLecLlon rules 4 esLabllsh cerLaln pollLlcal and legal lnsLlLuLlons LhaL are conslsLenL wlLh Lhe Lu's deflnlLlon of llberal democracy 2010 Snake ln Lhe Lunnel CommlLmenL Lo keeplng Luropean raLes wlLhln narrower band compared wlLh 8reLon Woods SysLem C L x c h a n g e
r a L e no lnLervenLlon CenLral bank buys domesLlc currency no lnLervenLlon CenLral bank sells domesLlc currency no lnLervenLlon 1lme +430 430 +223 223 Lu8CLAn Cu88LnC? unl1(LCu) Luropean Currency unlL (LCu) ls a composlLe currency unlL LhaL conslsLs of flxed amounLs of Len currencles 1he quanLlLy of each counLry's currency ln Lhe LCu reflecLs LhaL counLrles relaLlve economlc sLrengLh ln Lhe Luropean communlLy 1he LCu funcLlons as a unlL of accounL as a means of seLLlemenL and a reserve asseLs for Lhe members of LMS Weak vers|on % llxed bllaLeral exchange raLes (rlgldly or wlLhln a band) % Lach member underLakes moneLary pollcles Lo defend Lhe raLes Strong vers|on % lndlvldual currencles are replaced by a slngle currency % lndlvldual moneLary auLhorlLles are replaced by a slngle auLhorlLy WhaL ls MoneLary unlon? % 1he Luropean MoneLary lnsLlLuLe (LMl) was a precursor Lo Lhe Luropean CenLral 8ank (LC8) and was creaLed Lo % CoordlnaLe moneLary pollcles and ensure prlce sLablllLy % repare Lhe esLabllshmenL of Lhe Luropean SysLem of CenLral 8anks (LSC8) overseen by Lhe Luropean CenLral 8ank (LC8) % repare Lhe lnLroducLlon of a slngle currency ln sLage 3 % Lxamlne Lhe achlevemenL of economlc convergence among Lu sLaLes as esLabllshed by Lhe MaasLrlchL 1reaLy (1992) 1he Maastr|cht 1reaty (1991) % eflnes Lhree sLages ln Lhe process Lowards moneLary unlon I|rst Stage (from 1 !uly 1990 Lo 31 ecember 1993) 1he LMS counLrles abollshed all remalnlng caplLal conLrols (lree movemenL of caplLal) 1he degree of moneLary cooperaLlon among Lhe LMS cenLral banks were sLrengLhened 8eallgnmenLs were posslble Member sLaLes underLake programs LhaL make posslble flxed exchange raLes Second Stage (from 1 !anuary 1994 Lo 31 ecember 1998) A new lnsLlLuLlon Lhe Luropean MoneLary lnsLlLuLe (LMl) was creaLed 1he Maastr|cht 1reaty (1991) % 1h|rd (I|na|) Stage (from 1 !anuary 1999 Lo 31 !une 2002) 1he exchange raLes were lrrevocably flxed LsLabllshmenL of Lhe Luropean CenLral 8ank ln charge of Lhe Luropean moneLary pollcy 1he LC8 lssued Lhe euro 1he LranslLlon Lo Lhls flnal sLage was made condlLlonal on a number of convergence crlLerla" % 1hlrd SLage was dlvlded lnLo three substages 1 lrom 1 !anuary 1999 unLll 31 ecember 2001 Lhe naLlonal currencles conLlnued Lo clrculaLe alongslde Lhe euro albelL aL lrrevocably flxed exchange raLes Commerclal banks used Lhe euro ln lnLerbank LransacLlons lndlvlduals had Lhe cholce of openlng euro accounLs noLe LhaL durlng Lhls perlod Lhe euro dld noL exlsL ln Lhe form of banknoLes and colns All LransacLlons beLween Lhe LC8 and commerclal banks were ln euros new lssues of governmenL bonds were also ln euros 1he Maastr|cht 1reaty (1991) 2 urlng Lhe perlod 1 !anuary Lo 1 !uly 2002 Lhe euro would replace Lhe naLlonal currencles whlch would lose Lhelr legalLender sLaLus 3 lrom 1 !uly 2002 on a Lrue moneLary unlon would come Lo exlsLence ln whlch Lhe euro would be Lhe slngle currency managed by one cenLral bank LC8 1he MaasLrlchL 1reaLy was flnally raLlfled ln Lhe fall of 1993 and 12 counLrles (excepL uk Sweden and enmark) began Lo lmplemenL SLage 2 of LMu Lhe convergence phase ln whlch sLaLes were requlred Lo cuL Lhelr deflclLs and lower lnflaLlon Lo quallfy for SLage 3 1he Maastr|cht 1reaty (1991) WhaL ls LMu? W WhaL ls LMu descrlpLlon WhaL are Lhe Lhree parLs of LMu? 1) 1he euro counLrles glve up Lhelr own currency when Lhey [oln Lhe euro area 1he LC8 seLs lnLeresL raLes for Lhe euro area (16) 2) 1he s|ng|e market all counLrles parLlclpaLe ln Lhe slngle markeL wlLh free movemenL of goods servlces caplLal and people (27) 3) Lnhanced po||cy coord|nat|on counLrles reLaln soverelgnLy over oLher economlc pollcles buL commlL Lo coordlnaLe more closely aL Lhe Luropean level (27/16) Membershlp of Lhe Lconomlc and MoneLary unlon W 1o be parL of Lhe economlc and moneLary unlon LMS members musL 1 adhere Lo Lhe L8M exchange raLes were flxed ln speclfled bands around a LargeL exchange raLe 2 follow resLralned flscal and moneLary pollcles as deLermlned by Councll of Lhe Luropean unlon and Lhe Luropean CenLral 8ank 3 replace Lhe naLlonal currency wlLh Lhe euro whose clrculaLlon ls deLermlned by Lhe Luropean SysLem of CenLral 8anks 2021 1he Luro O an. 1, 1999: The euro became an oIIicial currency; O 1999-2002: Existing national currencies and the euro operate side by side at Iixed rates. The euro is not imposed as currency, but inter- bank transIers can be made in Euros. O an. 2002:New euro notes and coins circulate; O uly 2002: Local currencies are completely phased out and no longer allowed. Only euro transactions (cash or transIer) are possible. Whlch counLrles are ln Lhe euro area? W W Luro area Luro area AusLrla 8elglum Cyprus llnland lrance Cermany Creece lreland lLaly Luxembourg MalLa neLherlands orLugal Slovakla Slovenla Spaln W W LU Member States ob||ged to LU Member States ob||ged to adopt the euro eventua||y adopt the euro eventua||y 8ulgarla Czech 8epubllc LsLonla Pungary LaLvla LlLhuanla oland 8omanla Sweden W LU Member States w|th an opt out from adopt|ng the euro enmark unlLed klngdom nCn MLM8L8S Cl Lu8CZCnL Cf Lhe members of Lhe Luropean unlon Lo whlch parLlclpaLlon ln Lhls lnnovaLlon was resLrlcLed enmark Sweden and Lhe uk chose noL Lo lnLroduce Lhe euro ln place of Lhelr exlsLlng currencles 1he uk wlLhdrew from Lhe LMS Cne of Lhe causes of Lhls was Lhe subsLanLlal flow of shorL Lerm caplLal from Lhe uk where lnLeresL raLes were relaLlvely low Lo Cermany whlch was lmplemenLlng a very LlghL moneLary pollcy and hence had very hlgh lnLeresL raLes Pow does a counLry [oln Lhe euro? W A Member SLaLe musL fulflll Lhe convergence crlLerla" lald down by Lhe MaasLrlchL 1reaLy % Low lnflaLlon % Low lnLeresL raLes % Low governmenL deflclL % Low governmenL debL % SLable exchange raLe (L8M ll) WhaL are Lhe beneflLs of Lhe euro? WCI1I2LNS benef|t from qreoter price tronsporency wh|ch shou|d st|mu|ate competition and reduce prices and from the e/iminotion of currency exchonqe costs WIor 8USINLSSLS |t |s eas|er to make |nvestment dec|s|ons (no exchonqe rote risk) W1he LCCNCM benef|ts from price stobi/ity and |ack of exchonqe rote risk Countr|es that adopt the euro can no |onger change the|r IN1LkLS1 kA1L or the|r LkCnANGL kA1L In a monetary un|on you cannot have an INDLLNDLN1 MCNL1Ak CLIC % 8enef|ts 8educLlon ln LransacLlon cosLs LllmlnaLlon of Lhe exchange raLe rlsk CreaLer compeLlLlon leadlng Lo greaLer efflclency CreaLer lnLegraLlon among Lhe Luropean flnanclal markeLs and greaLer lnvesLmenL efflclency lnflaLlon dlsclpllne guaranLeed by Lhe lndependence of Lhe Luropean CenLral 8ank llscal dlsclpllne as a requlremenL Lo enLer and sLay ln Lhe sysLem lncrease Lhe urgency of sLrucLural reforms ln Lurope CosLs and beneflLs of Lhe Luro @he euro ond the sinq/e morket @he euro ond the sinq/e morket W 1he euro ellmlnaLes currency LransacLlons cosLs W Leads Lo greaLer prlce Lransparency prlce convergence W LllmlnaLes exchange raLe uncerLalnLy sLlmulaLes lnvesLmenL W Luro leads Lo lncreased Lrade and lnvesLmenL flows Cne markeL one money" lAC1C8S AllLC1lnC LxCPAnCL 8A1LS W lour facLors are ldenLlfled as fundamenLal deLermlnanLs of Lhe real euro Lo dollar exchange raLe W 1he lnLernaLlonal real lnLeresL raLe dlfferenLlal W 8elaLlve prlces ln Lhe Lraded and nonLraded goods secLors W 1he real oll prlce W 1he relaLlve flscal poslLlon Lconomlc pollcy maklng Lhe euro area and Lhe uS MoneLary pollcy lederal 8eserve Chalrman 8en S 8ernanke LC8 resldenL !eanClaude 1rlcheL llscal pollcy 1reasury SecreLary 1lmoLhy CelLhner Lurogroup llnance MlnlsLers Economic policy co Economic policy coordination more difficult? ordination more difficult? 1he Luro Area Lconomlc SlLuaLlon noL Cood! #eal annual change unless otherwise stated 2008 2009 2010 #eal GDP growth 0.8 -4.0 -0.1 InIlation 3.3 0.4 1.2 Unemployment rate (percentage oI labor Iorce) 7.5 9.9 11.5 Source Luropean Commlsslon Sprlng lorecasL May 2009 Why ls Lhe euro area so affecLed? W uS and euro area economles are closely connecLed W Many Luropean banks boughL securlLles Lled Lo uS subprlme loans W Cerman exporLs have fallen sharply W Spanlsh and lrlsh houslng bubbles have bursL W Luro area economy ls less flexlble has lower producLlvlLy growLh W Lxposure Lo LasLern Lurope? 1oLo l don'L Lhlnk we're ln kansas anymore" C8LLk C8lSlS W 8efore one Lo could even Lhlnk of Lhe end of greaL recesslon of 2008 Creece gave blrLh Lo anoLher crlsls W Creece debL crlsls ls acLually an evoluLlon of Lhe global crlsls W Creece allowed deflclLs from CenLral bank and governmenL bonds Lo plle up` W Creece debL came Lo llghL ln 2009 Cu88Ln1 C8lSlS W 1he Luropean debL crlsls came lnLo llmellghL wlLh Creece W 1hls was done by Lhe new governmenL who Look charge afLer Lhe general elecLlons W Shocklng role of Coldman Sachs ln Lhe fraud W new governmenL revealed Lhe facLs whlch acLually happened ln whlch Lhe prevlous governmenL had overspenL and also reporLed a debL whlch ballooned Lo 127 of Lhe C C8LLCL A1A W Creece has Lhe hlghesL deflclL of 136 of C or euro 324bn(as of Aprll 2010) W 8udgeL deflclL hlghesL ln Lhe world W ebL Lo C raLlo 113 W ebL C raLlo 2 nd hlghesL ln Lu W ebL of euro 216bn (as on [an 2010) Lurope's response Lo Lhe crlsls Tle ECB ieduces inieiesi iaies io lisioiically low levels (i.:%) and begun "quaniiiaiive easing" Dec o: EU goveinmenis adopi Euiopean Economic Recoveiy Plan - a cooidinaied fiscal siimulus Oci o: euio aiea goveinmenis adopi conceiied aciion plan io suppoii ileii financial sysiems 8AlLCu1 ACkACL W Creece was ln urgenL requlremenL of funds and on Aprll 23 rd lL approached lMl and Lu8CZCnLS asslsLance ln form of 8allouL package W CondlLlon for funds from lMl was LhaL Lhe economy musL lmplemenL Auster|ty measures W Lu lMl agreed Lo 110bn Luros(80bn Luros from Lu 30bn Luros from lMl) CCn18CvL8SlLS W ubllc proLesL ln Creece due Lo lmplemenLaLlon of ausLerlLy measures W roLesLs and pressure from oLher Luropean naLlons malnly Cermany(46 ln Lu)because Lhe debL load ls hlLLlng Lhe mark of 121 of C W owngradlng of Creece bonds Lo [unk sLaLus 8y S LllLC1S W SLock markeLs plummeLed W ShorL Lerm borrowlng raLes had hlL levels of 38 W ?leld premlum wldens owlng Lo lncreased cosL of borrowlng for Creece W epreclaLlon of currency 8LSCuL8S W Cermany Lhe largesL euro member because of Lhe feellng LhaL lL could lead Lo worsenlng of slLuaLlon Lo Lhe oLher Lurope naLlons W lMl by fundlng Lhe ballouL packageLu for provldlng SLCl AL u8CSLvLPlCLLS(Sv)of euro 440bn + 60bn(for emergencles) CCnCLuSlCn W lallure of Creek flnanclal sysLem wlll beneflL Lhe uS Lreasurles W Pelp uS Lo correcL lLs own flnanclals W Creek govL LargeLs publlc debL Lo a llmlL of 60and deflclL Lo 3 W Creece announces lncrease ln Laxes and spendlng cuLs Lo conLrol deflclL W Lu8C counLrles wlll fund Creece wlLh Lerms seL by LC8 W lMl can provlde more funds lf aL all requlred