You are on page 1of 9

Thank You

This PowerPoint document contains the


images that you requested.

Copyright Notice

All Online Service materials, including, without limitation, text, pictures, graphics and other files
and the selection and arrangement thereof are copyrighted materials of Ovid or its licensors, all
rights reserved. Except for the Authorized Use specified above, you may not copy, modify or
distribute any of the Online Service materials. You may not "mirror" any material contained on
this Online Service on any other server. Any unauthorized use of any material contained on this
Online Service may violate copyright laws, trademark laws, the laws of privacy and publicity and
communications regulations and statutes.
FIGURE 1
Craniovertebral Junction: Biomechanical Considerations.
Steinmetz, Michael; Mroz, Thomas; Benzel, Edward

Neurosurgery. The Management of Craniovertebral


Junction Disorders. 66(3) Supplement:A7-A12, March
2010.
DOI: 10.1227/01.NEU.0000366109.85796.42

FIGURE 1 . Drawings illustrating primary and mean


movement. A, the primary movement at the occiput-C1 is
flexion and extension. Mean movement is 23 to 24.5
degrees. B, the primary movement at C1-C2 is axial
rotation; mean movement is 23.3 to 38.9 degrees. C,
flexion/extension at C1-C2 ranges from 10.1 to 22.4
degrees. (Reprinted from Benzel EC, ed. Biomechanics of
Spine Stabilization. Rolling Meadows, IL: AANS Press;
2001,34 with permission from Thieme Publishers.)

Copyright © by the Congress of Neurological Surgeons. Published by Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Inc. 2
FIGURE 2
Craniovertebral Junction: Biomechanical Considerations.
Steinmetz, Michael; Mroz, Thomas; Benzel, Edward

Neurosurgery. The Management of Craniovertebral


Junction Disorders. 66(3) Supplement:A7-A12, March
2010.
DOI: 10.1227/01.NEU.0000366109.85796.42

FIGURE 2 . T1-weighted magnetic resonance imaging scan


(lateral view) of the craniovertebral junction. A
destructive lesion of the odontoid process is seen.

Copyright © by the Congress of Neurological Surgeons. Published by Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Inc. 3
FIGURE 3
Craniovertebral Junction: Biomechanical Considerations.
Steinmetz, Michael; Mroz, Thomas; Benzel, Edward

Neurosurgery. The Management of Craniovertebral


Junction Disorders. 66(3) Supplement:A7-A12, March
2010.
DOI: 10.1227/01.NEU.0000366109.85796.42

FIGURE 3 . Drawing showing that the anatomy of the


occiput-C1-C2 region makes fixation of this region very
difficult. (Reprinted from Benzel EC, ed. Biomechanics of
Spine Stabilization. Rolling Meadows, IL: AANS Press;
2001,34 with permission from Thieme Publishers.)

Copyright © by the Congress of Neurological Surgeons. Published by Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Inc. 4
FIGURE 4
Craniovertebral Junction: Biomechanical Considerations.
Steinmetz, Michael; Mroz, Thomas; Benzel, Edward

Neurosurgery. The Management of Craniovertebral


Junction Disorders. 66(3) Supplement:A7-A12, March
2010.
DOI: 10.1227/01.NEU.0000366109.85796.42

FIGURE 4 . Intraoperative photograph illustrating that


current-day occipitocervical constructs incorporate
polyaxial screws placed in the cervical spine (small blue
arrow) and, usually, a plate connected to the suboccipital
bone (large blue arrow). These are usually connected by
titanium rods.

Copyright © by the Congress of Neurological Surgeons. Published by Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Inc. 5
FIGURE 5
Craniovertebral Junction: Biomechanical Considerations.
Steinmetz, Michael; Mroz, Thomas; Benzel, Edward

Neurosurgery. The Management of Craniovertebral


Junction Disorders. 66(3) Supplement:A7-A12, March
2010.
DOI: 10.1227/01.NEU.0000366109.85796.42

FIGURE 5 . Drawings illustrating that occipitocervical


constructs may consist of plates connected from the
occiput to the cervical spine, usually by screws;
alternatively, wires may be used as well. A, because these
screws are placed in line with the C1 and C2 screws,
fixation is somewhat easier. B, longitudinal members may
be cross-linked. C, a downside of lateral fixation is that
the lateral suboccipital bone is much less thick as
compared with the midline keel. Only short screws may
be placed in the lateral bone, making fixation somewhat
less robust. (Reprinted from Benzel EC, ed. Biomechanics
of Spine Stabilization. Rolling Meadows, IL: AANS Press;
2001,34 with permission from Thieme Publishers.)

Copyright © by the Congress of Neurological Surgeons. Published by Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Inc. 6
FIGURE 6
Craniovertebral Junction: Biomechanical Considerations.
Steinmetz, Michael; Mroz, Thomas; Benzel, Edward

Neurosurgery. The Management of Craniovertebral


Junction Disorders. 66(3) Supplement:A7-A12, March
2010.
DOI: 10.1227/01.NEU.0000366109.85796.42

FIGURE 6 . Lateral intraoperative radiograph. Fixation of


C1 may be accomplished by lateral mass fixation. Pullout
resistance is greater as compared with wires. (Courtesy
of Iain Kalfas, MD.)

Copyright © by the Congress of Neurological Surgeons. Published by Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Inc. 7
FIGURE 7
Craniovertebral Junction: Biomechanical Considerations.
Steinmetz, Michael; Mroz, Thomas; Benzel, Edward

Neurosurgery. The Management of Craniovertebral


Junction Disorders. 66(3) Supplement:A7-A12, March
2010.
DOI: 10.1227/01.NEU.0000366109.85796.42

FIGURE 7 . Drawing (A) and lateral x-ray (B) showing that


rods may be affixed to the occiput-C1-C2 via wires.
(Reprinted from Benzel EC, ed. Biomechanics of Spine
Stabilization. Rolling Meadows, IL: AANS Press; 2001,34
with permission from Thieme Publishers.)

Copyright © by the Congress of Neurological Surgeons. Published by Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Inc. 8
FIGURE 8
Craniovertebral Junction: Biomechanical Considerations.
Steinmetz, Michael; Mroz, Thomas; Benzel, Edward

Neurosurgery. The Management of Craniovertebral


Junction Disorders. 66(3) Supplement:A7-A12, March
2010.
DOI: 10.1227/01.NEU.0000366109.85796.42

FIGURE 8 . Drawing showing that fixation to the cervical


spine may be via transarticular screws. Biomechanically,
this construct provides significant stability in
flexion/extension and rotation. (Reprinted from Benzel
EC, ed. Biomechanics of Spine Stabilization. Rolling
Meadows, IL: AANS Press; 2001,34 with permission from
Thieme Publishers.)

Copyright © by the Congress of Neurological Surgeons. Published by Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Inc. 9

You might also like