Professional Documents
Culture Documents
(obedience)
Behavioral Study of Obedience.
Background: General
• Stanley Milgram was a social psychologist at Yale University
in 1960.
• The teacher then tested the learner by giving him one of the
words in a pair with four other words. The learner had to
choose the word that was previously paired with the first
word. If his answer was correct, the next word on the list was
read. If it was incorrect, the teacher had to state the correct
answer and administer an electric shock (starting from 15
volts).
Procedure:
• For every wrong answer, the shock level would increase by 15
volts (15, 30, 45, ...) The learner actually gave a
predetermined set of answers with about three wrong
answers for every right answer.
• At 300 volts, the learner would start hitting the wall and
shouting. He stopped answering questions.
• If the participant said that the learner did not want to continue,
another prod was used:
“Whether the learner likes it or not, you must go on until
he has learned all the word pairs correctly, so please go on.”
Procedure:
• The experiment ended if the participant refused to continue after
the four official prods, or if 450 volts were administered.
• 65% obeyed
• 35% terminated the experiment before reaching 450 volts.
• When the experimenter was the one to end the experiment (at
450 volts), many of the participants sighed in relief or shook
their heads in what seemed like regret.
Results:
• Most of the participants were sweating, shaking, stuttering or
fidgeting during the study.
• 3 had seizures and the procedure was stopped for one of them.
• Average rating of how painful the shocks were was 13.42 out of
a maximum of 14.
Conclusions:
• People are much more obedient to destructive orders than we
think.
GRAVE
Evaluation:
GRAVE Generalisability
GRAVE Reliability
GRAVE Application
GRAVE Validity
GRAVE Ethics
Deception in terms of what the study was about and whether the shocks
were real.
Ethics are low as several participants suffered during the study with stress.
Protection of the participant’s state of mind and they would not exit the
study in the same mental state they entered in.
The right to withdraw might not have been there as prods were used.
Evaluation: Other considerations
Are Germans different?:
This study shows that Germans are no different to anyone else,
disproving Milgram's theory and instead providing evidence for the
situational disposition.