Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Rural-Urban Development
MDM5061
12
The Urban Giantism Problem
■ occurs when capital cities or other “urban giants” suffer from enormous levels of
congestion, but adequate mid-size cities that might provide alternative locations for
growth are lacking the problem of congestion.
■ There may be general urban bias
– Cities are capital intensive so may expect large cities commonly located in developed countries
– But urbanization in developing countries has taken place at unexpectedly rapid pace
– Huge informal sectors in shanty towns
– Large fraction of workers outside formal sector
– Much urban growth is in mid-size cities, but urban bias remains a serious issue in many developing
countries
– There may be First-City Bias (favoring largest city)
■ Causes of Urban Giantism:
– Import substitution industrialization: less trade, incentive to concentrate in a single city largely to avoid
transportation costs
– “Bread and circuses” to prevent unrest (evidence: stable democracies vs unstable dictatorships)
– Hub and spoke transportation system (rather than web) makes transport costs high for small cities
–
Population of the Largest and Second- Politics and Urban Concentration
Largest Cities in Selected Countries
(millions)
The Urban Informal Sector
■ Why promote the urban informal sector?
– Generates surplus despite hostile environment
– Creating jobs due to low capital intensively
– Access to (informal) training, and apprenticeships
– Creates demand for less- or un- skilled workers
– Uses appropriate technologies, local resources
– Recycling of waste materials
– More benefits to poor, especially women who are concentrated in the informal
sector
Importance of Informal Employment in Selected Cities
Youth Unemployment Rates, 1995 and 2005
Migration and Development Components of Migration in
Selected Countries
■ Rural-to-urban migration was viewed
positively until recently
■ The current view is that this migration is
greater than the urban areas’ abilities to
– Create jobs
– Provide social services
■ Factors affecting African urbanization
■ Rural Push Factors
– More poverty
– Less work opportunities
– Limited education opportunities
– Fewer medical facilities
– Environmental problems
■ Urban Pull Factors
– possibilities of jobs
– better education
– better medical
■ Generally, the Sub-Saharan African migration is more of driven by push factors than pull factors.
Toward an Economic Theory of Rural-Urban Migration
■ A Verbal Description of the Todaro Model
– Migration is a rational decision
– The decision depends on expected rather than actual wage differentials
– The probability of obtaining a city job is inversely related to the urban
unemployment rate
– High rates of migration are outcomes of rural urban imbalances
■ Todaro migration model - A theory that explains rural-urban migration as an
economically rational process despite high urban unemployment. Migrants
calculate (present value of) urban expected income (or its equivalent) and move
if this exceeds average rural income.
■ Harris-Todaro model - An equilibrium version of the Todaro migration model
that predicts that expected incomes will be equated across rural and urban
sectors when taking into account informal sector activities and outright
unemployment
A Diagrammatic Presentation
Schematic Framework for Analyzing
the Rural-to-Urban Migration
Decision
The Harris-Todaro Migration Model
LM
WA (W M )
LUS
Where
WA is agricultural income,
LM is employment in manufacturing
LUS is total urban labor pool
WM is the urban minimum wage
The Harris-Todaro Migration Model