Professional Documents
Culture Documents
© 2013 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be scanned, copied, duplicated, or posted to a publicly
accessible website, in whole or in part.
Learning Objectives
Which factors determine whether a firm should be
decentralized or centralized?
How are decentralization and responsibility accounting
related?
What are the four primary types of responsibility centers, and
what distinguishes them from each other?
How are revenue variances computed?
Why and how are support department costs allocated to
operating departments?
What types of transfer prices are used in organizations, and
why are such prices used?
What difficulties can be encountered by multinational
companies using transfer prices?
© 2013 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be scanned, copied, duplicated, or posted to a publicly
accessible website, in whole or in part.
Organizational Structure
Centralization
Decentralization
Top management delegates
makes all major
authority,
decisions and
retains full authority
responsibility, and decision-making
and responsibility
rights
for the
to
organization’s
subunit managers
activities
© 2013 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be scanned, copied, duplicated, or posted to a publicly
accessible website, in whole or in part.
Decentralization Continuum (slide 1 of 2)
Factor Centralized Decentralized
Age of firm Young Mature
Size of firm Small Large
Stage of product
development Stable Growth
Growth rate Slow Rapid
Impact on profits
of incorrect decisions High Low
Management’s
confidence in
subordinates Low High
Degree of control Tight Moderate/loose
© 2013 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be scanned, copied, duplicated, or posted to a publicly
accessible website, in whole or in part.
Decentralization Continuum (slide 2 of 2)
Factor Centralized Decentralized
Geographic
diversity Local Widespread
Cost of communications Low High
Ability to resolve
conflicts Easy Difficult
Level of employee
motivation Low Moderate to high
Level of organizational
flexibility Low High
Response time to
changes Slow Rapid
© 2013 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be scanned, copied, duplicated, or posted to a publicly
accessible website, in whole or in part.
Advantages and Disadvantages of
Decentralization
Advantages Disadvantages
Lack of goal congruence
Personnel
Train and screen aspiring Suboptimization
managers Pursuing the subunit
Develop leadership manager’s goals instead of
qualities, problem-solving the company’s goals
abilities, and decision- Requires more effective
making skills communication skills
Compare managers’ results Managers must relinquish
Increase job satisfaction control
and job enrichment Expensive
Effective means of Train managers in decision-
achieving organizational making skills
goals Absorb cost of poor decisions
Reduces decision-making Requires a sophisticated
time planning and reporting system
Allows management by
exception
© 2013 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be scanned, copied, duplicated, or posted to a publicly
accessible website, in whole or in part.
Responsibility Accounting
Managers delegate decision-making authority
but retain responsibility for outcomes.
Reporting system
Provides information about subunits
Allows management to measure subunit performance
Consistent with
Standard costing
Activity-based costing
Monetary and nonmonetary
Adjusted for the planning, controlling, and decision-
making needs of each unit manager
Separates costs as controllable or noncontrollable
by the unit manager
© 2013 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be scanned, copied, duplicated, or posted to a publicly
accessible website, in whole or in part.
Responsibility Report
DEPARTMENT MANAGER
Budgeted Actual
Costs Costs Variance
Itemized Costs
Controllable
Noncontrollable
Nonmonetary items
© 2013 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be scanned, copied, duplicated, or posted to a publicly
accessible website, in whole or in part.
Nonmonetary Measures
Reductionmeasures
Capacity of non-value-added time
Target ROIsuggestions received/implemented
Employee
Desired/actual
Unplanned production
market share
interruptions
Throughput
Schedule changes
Defects
Engineering changes
Backorders
Safety violations
Complaints
Absenteeism
On-time delivery
Manufacturing cycle efficiency
© 2013 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be scanned, copied, duplicated, or posted to a publicly
accessible website, in whole or in part.
Control Process Steps
Prepare a plan using budgets and standards and
use it to communicate output expectations and
delegate authority
Use responsibility accounting system gather, record,
and summarize data for each organizational unit
Monitor the differences between planned and actual
data at scheduled intervals
Exert influence in response to significant differences
Continue comparing data and responding and then
begin the process again
© 2013 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be scanned, copied, duplicated, or posted to a publicly
accessible website, in whole or in part.
Responsibility Reporting
Upward flow of information
From operations to top management
Unit level reports are detailed
Upper-level reports are summarized
Encourages management by exception
Major deviations are highlighted
© 2013 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be scanned, copied, duplicated, or posted to a publicly
accessible website, in whole or in part.
Responsibility Reporting System
Division data
are reported
to the CEO
To CEO
Department Division A Total
data are
Division B Total
reported to
Total for Company
the Division
Division A
Division B
Dept Q Totals
Dept X Totals
Dept R Totals
Dept Y Totals
Total for Division
Total for Division
Dept Q Costs Dept R Costs
Itemized Itemized
Total for Dept Total for Dept
© 2013 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be scanned, copied, duplicated, or posted to a publicly
accessible website, in whole or in part.
Disadvantages of Responsibility
Accounting
Disadvantages of responsibility accounting
include
Important details may not be visible at upper
management levels
Managers might “promote” their unit while
“blaming” their competitor units
Could lead to lack of goal congruence
Departmental interdependencies might not be
visible
© 2013 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be scanned, copied, duplicated, or posted to a publicly
accessible website, in whole or in part.
Responsibility Centers
Responsibility
accounting systems
identify, measure, and
report on activities in
responsibility centers
Cost center
Revenue center
Profit center
Investment center
© 2013 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be scanned, copied, duplicated, or posted to a publicly
accessible website, in whole or in part.
Cost Centers
Authority to incur costs
Evaluated on how well costs are controlled
Revenues
Do not exist
© 2013 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be scanned, copied, duplicated, or posted to a publicly
accessible website, in whole or in part.
Profit Centers
Responsible for generating revenues—set
selling prices
Responsible for controlling expenses —allowed
to purchase at most economical price
Goal is to maximize the center’s profit
Independent units
Examples:
Bank branches
Educational divisions
18-wheelers
Evaluate on profit variance
© 2013 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be scanned, copied, duplicated, or posted to a publicly
accessible website, in whole or in part.
Investment Centers
© 2013 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be scanned, copied, duplicated, or posted to a publicly
accessible website, in whole or in part.
Responsibility Centers
© 2013 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be scanned, copied, duplicated, or posted to a publicly
accessible website, in whole or in part.
Service Department Cost Allocation
Engineering Accounting
Security Legal
Warehousing Insurance
© 2013 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be scanned, copied, duplicated, or posted to a publicly
accessible website, in whole or in part.
Allocating Service Costs: Full Cost
Objective
Reasons against:
for:
Managers
Cost recovery
cannot control costs
Awareness
Arbitrary costs
of support
not useful
costs
in decision making
“Fair share”
Confuses costing
of costs
and pricing issues
Regulations for some pricing instances
© 2013 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be scanned, copied, duplicated, or posted to a publicly
accessible website, in whole or in part.
Allocating Service Costs: Motivation
for Managers Objective
Reasons against:
for:
Distorts profits
Awareness of support
with subjective
costs in allocations
production managers
Relates unit’s
Managers cannot
profitcontrol
to totalcosts
company profits
Reflects
Not material
usage
to profits
of services
Encourages
Creates interdivisional
cost control ill will
Encourages
Not cost beneficial
usage of certain services
© 2013 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be scanned, copied, duplicated, or posted to a publicly
accessible website, in whole or in part.
Allocating Service Costs: Compare
Alternate Courses of Action Objective
Reasons against:
for:
Unnecessary
Relevant information
if costs helps
do notcompare
change among
alternatives
alternatives
Provides allocations
Arbitrary best cost estimates
distort cash
when
flow
comparing
and profitsalternatives
for
alternatives
© 2013 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be scanned, copied, duplicated, or posted to a publicly
accessible website, in whole or in part.
Allocation Bases for Service
Department Costs
Rational and systematic base
Benefit received by revenue-producing department
Causal relationship
Fairness or equity of the allocations
Ability of revenue-producing department to bear the
allocated cost
Methods
Direct method
Step method
Benefits-provided ranking
Algebraic method
Simultaneous equations
© 2013 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be scanned, copied, duplicated, or posted to a publicly
accessible website, in whole or in part.
Direct Method
Assigns costs straight to revenue-producing areas
Service Revenue
1 2 A B C
Step 1 $
Step 2 $
Does not recognize service provided
to other service departments
© 2013 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be scanned, copied, duplicated, or posted to a publicly
accessible website, in whole or in part.
Service Method
Partially recognizes relationships
among service departments
Service Revenue
1 2 A B C
Step 1 $
Step 2 $
Does not recognize the two-way exchange of
services between service departments
© 2013 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be scanned, copied, duplicated, or posted to a publicly
accessible website, in whole or in part.
Algebraic Method Provides the best
allocation
information
Service Revenue
1 2 A B C
At the $
same
time $
© 2013 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be scanned, copied, duplicated, or posted to a publicly
accessible website, in whole or in part.
Service Cost Allocation
© 2013 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be scanned, copied, duplicated, or posted to a publicly
accessible website, in whole or in part.
Transfer Pricing
Internal charges for the Advantages
exchange of goods or services Encourage development
within the organization
of beneficial services
Promote goal congruence
Promote cost
Ensure optimal resource
allocation consciousness of
Promote operational efficiency services provided
Promote making a
Make performance evaluation
among segments more service department a
comparable profit center
Transform a cost center into a
pseudo-profit center Transfer prices are for internal use
Encourages managers to be only. They are eliminated on external
entrepreneurial financial reports.
© 2013 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be scanned, copied, duplicated, or posted to a publicly
accessible website, in whole or in part.
Setting the Transfer Price
production volume
Standard costs are stable measures of
production costs
Variances are attributed to selling division
© 2013 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be scanned, copied, duplicated, or posted to a publicly
accessible website, in whole or in part.
Market-Based Transfer Prices
© 2013 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be scanned, copied, duplicated, or posted to a publicly
accessible website, in whole or in part.
Negotiated Transfer Prices
© 2013 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be scanned, copied, duplicated, or posted to a publicly
accessible website, in whole or in part.
© 2013 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be scanned, copied, duplicated, or posted to a publicly
accessible website, in whole or in part.
Dual Pricing
© 2013 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be scanned, copied, duplicated, or posted to a publicly
accessible website, in whole or in part.
Advantages and Disadvantages of
Transfer Pricing Systems
Advantages
Disadvantages
May cause
Permit evaluation
disagreement
of segment
amongperformance
managers
Allow costs
Adds for rational
and takes
acquisition
time of goods and services between
corporate
May not workdivisions
for all departments
Provide
May causeflexibility to respondortooverutilization
underutilization changes of services
Encourage
May cause and reward goal
dysfunctional congruencebehavior
organizational
Causes a need for year-end entries to eliminate transfer prices
© 2013 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be scanned, copied, duplicated, or posted to a publicly
accessible website, in whole or in part.
Multinational Transfer Pricing
Develop guidelines
Differences in that are followed on a consistent basis
Tax
Set systems
transfer prices that reflect an arm’s-length transaction
Customs duties
Be prepared for transfer pricing audits
Freight and insurance costs
Consider Advance Pricing Agreements—binding contracts
Import/export regulations
between a company and taxing authorities that set an
Foreign-exchange controls
acceptable transfer pricing methodology
© 2013 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be scanned, copied, duplicated, or posted to a publicly
accessible website, in whole or in part.
Transfer Pricing Audit
© 2013 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be scanned, copied, duplicated, or posted to a publicly
accessible website, in whole or in part.
Multinational Transfer Pricing
Objectives
Internal
External
Fewer goal
Better taxescongruence
and tariffs
Better performance
Fewer foreign exchange
evaluations
risks
More motivated
Better competitive
managers
positions
Better relations
cash management
with government
© 2013 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be scanned, copied, duplicated, or posted to a publicly
accessible website, in whole or in part.
Questions
© 2013 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be scanned, copied, duplicated, or posted to a publicly
accessible website, in whole or in part.
Potential Ethical Issues
Managers who make decisions to benefit
themselves but not always the firm
Burying important details in responsibility reports
Allocating costs using “ability-to-bear” criterion
Shifting support department costs to inappropriate
departments
Not allowing managers to buy or sell externally in a
transfer pricing situation
Using transfer pricing to shift costs to low- or no-tax
locations
© 2013 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be scanned, copied, duplicated, or posted to a publicly
accessible website, in whole or in part.