Professional Documents
Culture Documents
CULTURE
Following Lyotard, postmodern culture also means people have a declining faith in the validity of 'big stories'
such as political ideologies or religions, or anything else which makes a claim to the universal truth.
What is postmodern popular culture?
Post modernism is said to describe the emergence of a social order in which the importance and power of the
mass media and popular culture mean they govern and shape other forms of social relationship.
I’d say best typical example is the proliferation of memes. They are modern cultural references and a hallmark
of postmodernism. First, we create memes to mock out reality.
Feminism and popular culture
Feminism in Popular Culture explores (not surprisingly) the relationship between feminism
and popular culture, examining feminism's place within (and outside of) 'contemporary
commonsense', and asking whether feminism can learn from popular culture and vice
versa.
How does feminism affect modern culture?
Feminism has provided Western women with increased educational opportunities, the right
to vote, protections against workplace discrimination, and the right to make personal
decisions about pregnancy. In some communities, feminism has also succeeded
in challenging pervasive cultural norms about women.
Cultural feminism refers to a philosophy that men and women
have different approaches to the world around them, and that
greater value should be placed on the way women approach the
world. In some cases, cultural feminism argues that a woman's
way of looking at the world is actually superior to men's.
Post structuralism and popular culture
Structuralism, as an intellectual movement in France in the 1950s and 1960s, studied underlying structures
in cultural products (such as texts) and used analytical concepts from linguistics, psychology, anthropology, and
other fields to interpret those structures. Structuralism posits the concept of binary opposition, in which frequently-
used pairs of opposite-but-related words (concepts) are often arranged in a hierarchy; for
example: Enlightenment/Romantic, male/female, speech/writing, rational/emotional, signified/signifier,
symbolic/imaginary, and east/west.
Semiotics of culture is a research field within semiotics that attempts to define culture from
semiotic perspective and as a type of human symbolic activity, creation of signs and a way
of giving meaning to everything around. Therefore, culture is understood as a system of
symbols or meaningful signs.
Global culture as adopted by the Spanish has been "ordinary" to the point
that it was a "watering-down of Spanish-European culture in order to win
over the general public to the colonial regime's 'ideology.' At that time,
colonial authorities created popular culture, with the aid of local
intelligentsia, to promote the interests of the Church and the State.
However, once they saw the influence of mass culture and learned
how to work their way as propaganda, the native intelligentsia soon
used the Spanish tool against them. The native intelligentsia used
the same types of popular culture in the 19th century, through
the Propaganda movement, to "undermine the influence of the
oppressive friars and mobilize the people to bring an end to colonial
rule" One example of that is Marcelo H's work. Del Pilar, as he used
prayers like 'Aba, Ginoong Maria' and 'Ama Namin' in a kind of
satire to hit the violent Spanish Brothers.
The rise of American colonization introduced to the Philippines the
properly so-called, mainstream culture. The liberal approach
towards the printing press quickly expanded the dissemination of
types of popular culture through radio, television and film.
Then not only by these types but also in digital media such as
films. In the Philippine market, Hollywood films had a
near-monopoly, particularly in the absence of European
films due to World War I.
Early on, the local intelligentsia had the same apprehensions
about mass media as they called it advertisement, or art
vulgarisation. According to Lumbera, the local intelligentsia
noted that "Popular literature as a product intended for a mass
market was seen as a challenge to serious artistic practice, since the
writers accommodated his art to the demands of the publishers and
editors who were more interested in sales than in aesthetics."
Moreover, "... common culture is not produced by the masses ... it is
rather a culture generated either by the ruling elite or by
representatives of the intelligentsia in the employment of that elite,
for the consumption of the people;" it is ".... 'packaged'
entertainment or art intended for the benefit of rulers, be they
colonial administrators or native bureaucrats and businessmen."
Philippines commands cultural, political, and social influence. Via
many media theories, it has been shown that the main objective of
the media through the dissemination of pop culture produces a
commercialized environment because it generates money from
advertisements, and whoever controls economic power always
controls the political.
News outlets may also promote pop culture in order to make their
viewers act in the way they can favor them, often because they
monopolize the stream of information. This can also be offset by
media democratization by promoting social networking sites, and by
spreading thoughts on the internet as a netizen.
It can trigger leverage, but the full potential for complete
democratisation may not be completely realized until all people
in society can have full access with the aforementioned
technology. It can also have down-effects for media outlets, as if
"empowering" them, to use Netizens as the primary sources of
knowledge. This can also be overcome with awareness if the public
learns how to use social media to their benefit.
"Pop culture is power, and anyone who uses it to control minds
would inevitably find his literary and technical machinery turned
against him when the minds he has exploited discover his power as a
political tool" (Lumbera, 1984).
The future of the political, cultural, and social facilities of social
media as a resource, or a weapon, against media conglomerates and
advertising machinery, or the government, or any institutional
agenda, can still be achieved if the general public, particularly those
on the margins who have always been exploited by the false media
images, are to discover and harness their full potential.