Professional Documents
Culture Documents
4-Koehler-Presentation 4 - Innovative Utilization of Smart I
4-Koehler-Presentation 4 - Innovative Utilization of Smart I
Jeff Kerker, Terry Koehler, Eddie Saab, Bruce Power Design Team Leader Lakeside Process Controls Project Technical Lead Lakeside Process Controls Account Manager
Introduction
HX5 History Basic System Operating Philosophy Project Scope Design Issues Control Retrofit Challenges and Solutions Results Achieved Summary Lessons Learned
HX5 History
Steam hammers discovered and documented in HX5 drain lines. Station Condition Record (SCRs) were raised and Operating Experience (OPEX) was reviewed for similar events. Various fixes applied that did not really address the root causes (e.g. boosters, time delay relays, valve changes, diffuser mods etc.) Several steam hammer mechanisms were occurring, at various system conditions, that confused the investigations.
Project Scope
Remove inverted loop in HX5 drains lines Upgrade HX5 level control system identified as a contributing factor to various steam hammers. Maintain independent, hard-wired turbine water induction protection. (e.g. level switches) Operator actions to be minimized. HX5 to operate as per original design. Modification required for the next unit outage. (7 months)
Design Issues
Where and how to bore the hole between the reheater drains pit and the condenser pit to eliminate the inverted loop?
Design Issues
Original Piping Configuration
Bruce A
45 pipe el. 592-0 pipe el. 582-3 36 Condensate Line Condenser Pit el. 578 Pit Bottom el. 571 Condenser CD1 35 28 HP Heater Drain Line 12 dia. Ground Floor el. 591 Condensate Trench pipe el. 582-4 pipe el. 583 35 pipe el. 592-6 C L HP Heater el. 595-3
Bruce B
40 pipe el. 593-6 pipe el. 585-3 Condenser CD1 60 HP Heater Drain Line in shallow trench pipe el. 589-10 HP Heater Drain Line 16 dia Condenser Pit el. 578 Pit Bottom el. 571 pipe el. 585 35 Ground Floor el. 591 C L HP Heater el. 595-3
Design Issues
New Configuration
HP Heater Drains Line reduced in size from 16 to 12 dia. Pit Bottom el. 571
Design Issues
Where and how to bore the hole between the reheater drains pit and the condenser pit to eliminate the inverted loop? The drains line contains saturated water at low power conditions. How do we deal with smaller secondary steam hammers caused by steam bubble formation and collapse?
Solution
Significantly reduce size of possible steam bubble by:
Reducing line length Reducing line diameter Continuous upward sloping line
Design the line to withstand 45,000 lbf steam hammer at all locations.
Design Issues
Where and how to bore the hole between the reheater drains pit and the condenser pit to eliminate the inverted loop? The drains line contains saturated water at low power conditions. How do we deal with smaller secondary steam hammers caused by steam bubble formation and collapse? Upgrade pneumatic controls to Smart electronic.
New DA Valve
Actual
11
9 7 5 3
20 10 0 3:03:36 PM
1 -1 -3 3:10:48 PM
Simulation Allowed for control strategy tuning and testing in a safe environment Predicted many actual cases which were abnormal conditions which could not be field tested Predicted 5 minutes to stabilization on deaerator pump start Successful prediction of events tested in commissioning give confidence that predictions of behaviour under abnormal events are similarly accurate
3:04:19 PM
3:05:02 3:05:46 PM PM
3:06:29 PM
3:07:12 PM
3:07:55 PM
3:08:38 PM
3:09:22 PM
3:10:05 PM
Results Achieved
Results Achieved
Tunnels were bored, old piping was removed, new piping installed, control system installed and cold commissioned completed in 28 days. Unit ran up with HX5A and HX5B in service with no level alarms or transients. Only operator action required was to turn on the drains pumps. Small system disturbances occurred that were later corrected with minor control changes and modified system line-up. The next unit start-up confirmed that these changes solved the problem.