Professional Documents
Culture Documents
INTRODUCTION TO ECONOMICS 2e / LIEBERMAN & HALL CHAPTER 17 / AGGREGATE DEMAND AND AGGREGATE SUPPLY 2005, South-Western/Thomson Learning
Figure 1: The Two-Way Relationship Between Output and the Price Level
Aggregate Demand Curve
Price Level
Real GDP
First effect of a change in the price level occurs in the money market Rise in the price increases the demand for money and shifts the money demand curve rightward It makes purchases more expensive Drop in the price level
Makes purchases cheaper Decreases the demand for money Shifts the money demand curve leftward
Rise in the price level causes the interest rate to rise and interest-sensitive spending to fall Equilibrium GDP decreases by a multiple of the decrease
in interest-sensitive spending
K J
100
AD
10
A variety of events can cause the price level to change, and move us along the AD curve
Opposite sequence of events will occur if the price level falls, moving us rightward along the AD curve
The distinction between movements along the AD curve and shifts of the curve itself is very important Always keep the following rule in mind
When a change in the price level causes equilibrium GDP to change, we
move along the AD curve Whenever anything other than the price level causes equilibrium GDP to change, the AD curve itself shifts
What are these other influences on GDP? Equilibrium GDP will change whenever there is a change in any of
the following
Government spending Taxes Autonomous consumption spending Investment spending The money supply curve The money demand curve
curve leftward
P3
P1
P2
AD
Q3
Lieberman & Hall; Introduction to Economics, 2005
Q1
Q2
Real GDP
10
AD2
AD1 Real GDP
Lieberman & Hall; Introduction to Economics, 2005
11
AD1
AD2 Real GDP
Lieberman & Hall; Introduction to Economics, 2005
12
On the one hand, changes in the price level affect output On the other hand, changes in output affect the
price level This relationshipsummarized by the aggregate supply curveis the focus of this section
The effect of changes in output on the price level is complex, involving a variety of forces
13
Price level in economy results from pricing behavior of millions of individual business firms In any given year, some of these firms will raise their
prices, and some will lower them
Often, all firms in the economy are affected by the same macroeconomic event Causing prices to rise or fall throughout the economy To understand how macroeconomic events affect the price level, we begin with a very simple assumption A firm sets price of its products as a markup over cost
per unit
14
Percentage markup in any particular industry will depend on degree of competition there In macroeconomics, we are not concerned with how the markup differs in different industries But rather with average percentage markup in economy
Determined by competitive conditions Competitive structure changes very slowly, so average percentage
markup should be somewhat stable from year-to-year
But a stable markup does not necessarily mean a stable price level, because unit costs can change In short-run, price level rises when there is an economy-wide
increase in unit costs
15
Why should a change in output affect unit costs and price level? As total output increases
Greater amounts of inputs may be needed to produce a unit of
output Price of non-labor inputs rise Nominal wage rate rises
A decrease in output affects unit costs through the same three forces, but with opposite result
16
17
Some of the more important reasons why wages in many industries respond so slowly to changes in output Many firms have union contracts that specify wages for
up to three years Wages in many large corporations are set by slowmoving bureaucracies Wage changes in either direction can be costly to firms Firms may benefit from developing reputations for paying stable wages
18
Nominal wage rate is fixed in short-run We assume that changes in output have no
effect on nominal wage rate in short-run
Since we assume a constant nominal wage in short-run, a change in output will affect unit costs through the other two factors In short-run, a rise (fall) in real GDP, by causing
unit costs to increase (decrease), will also cause a rise (decrease) in price level
19
Figure 5 summarizes discussion about effect of output on price level in short-run Each time we change level of output, there will be a new price level in short-run Giving us another point on the figure If we connect all of these points, we obtain economys
aggregate supply curve Tells us price level consistent with firms unit costs and their
percentage markup at any level of output over short-run
130 100 80 C A
Starting at point A, an increase in output raises unit costs. Firms raise prices, and the overall price level rises.
Starting at point A, a decrease in output lowers unit costs. Firms cut prices, and the overall price level falls.
6
Lieberman & Hall; Introduction to Economics, 2005
10
13.5
21
When a change in output causes price level to change, we move along economys AS curve What happens in economy as we make such a
move? As we move upward along AS curve, we can represent what happens as follows
22
Figure 5 assumed that a number of important variables remained unchanged Unit costs sometimes change for reasons other than a change in
output
In general, we distinguish between a movement along AS curve, and a shift of curve itself, as follows When a change in real GDP causes the price level to change, we
move along AS curve
When anything other than a change in real GDP causes price level to
change, AS curve itself shifts
What can cause unit costs to change at any given level of output? Changes in world oil prices Changes in the weather Technological change Nominal wage, etc.
23
P1 P2
Q2
Lieberman & Hall; Introduction to Economics, 2005
Q1
Q3
Real GDP
24
Real GDP
Lieberman & Hall; Introduction to Economics, 2005
25
Entire AS curve shifts downward if unit costs for any reason besides an decrease in real GDP
Real GDP
Lieberman & Hall; Introduction to Economics, 2005
26
100
6
Lieberman & Hall; Introduction to Economics, 2005
10
14
27
Our short-run equilibrium will change when either AD curve, AS curve, or both, shift An event that causes AD curve to shift is called a
demand shock An event that causes AS curve to shift is called a supply shock
In earlier chapters, weve used phrase spending shock A change in spending by one or more sectors that
ultimately affects entire economy Demand shocks and supply shocks are just two different categories of spending shocks
28
first output increases, and then price level rises In reality, output and price level tend to rise together
29
H J
AD1
AD2
10
Lieberman & Hall; Introduction to Economics, 2005
13.5 12.5
30
Can summarize impact of price-level changes When government purchases increase, horizontal shift of AD curve
measures how much real GDP would increase if price level remained constant
But because price level rises, real GDP rises by less than horizontal
shift in AD curve
31
32
Although monetary policy stimulates economy through a different channel than fiscal policy Once we arrive at AD and AS diagram, two look very
33
U.S. economy collapsed far more seriously during 1929 through 1933the onset of the Great Depressionthan it did at any other time What do we know about demand shocks that caused Great Depression? Fall of 1929, bubble of optimism burst Stock market crashed, and investment and consumption
spending plummeted Demand for products exported by United States fell Fed reacted by cutting money supply sharply Each of these events contributed to a leftward shift of AD curve
34
In Figure 9, point H shows new equilibrium after a positive demand shock in short-runa year or so after the shock But point H is not necessarily where economy will end up
in long-run
In short-run, we treat wage rate as given But in long-run, wage rate can change When output is above full employment, wage rate will
rise, shifting AS curve upward When output is below full employment, wage rate will fall, shifting AS curve downward
35
Increase in government purchases has no effect on equilibrium GDP in long-run Economy returns to full employment, which is just where
it started This is why long-run adjustment process is often called economys self-correcting mechanism
If a demand shock pulls economy away from full employment Change in wage rate and price level will eventually cause
economy to correct itself and return to full-employment output
36
AS2
AS1 P4 P3 K J H E AD2 AD1 YFE Y3 Y2
Lieberman & Hall; Introduction to Economics, 2005
P2 P1
Real GDP
37
For a positive demand shock that shifts AD curve rightward, self-correcting mechanism works like this
38
P1 P2 P3
E N
M
AD1 AD2
Y2
Lieberman & Hall; Introduction to Economics, 2005
YFE
Real GDP
39
Complete sequence of events after a negative demand shock looks like this
40
Can summarize economys self-correcting mechanism as follows Whenever a demand shock pulls economy away from full
employment Self-correcting mechanism will eventually bring it back When output exceeds its full-employment level, wages will eventually rise Causing a rise in price level and a drop in GDP until full
employment is restored
41
Self-correcting mechanism provides an important link between economys long-run and short-run behaviors Long-run aggregate supply curve also illustrates another classical conclusion An increase in government purchases causes complete crowding out
Rise in government purchases is precisely matched by a drop in
consumption and investment spending
Self-correcting mechanism shows that, in long-run, economy will eventually behave as classical model predicts Notice the word eventually in the previous statement This is why governments around the world are reluctant to rely on
self-correcting mechanism alone to keep economy on track
42
Long-Run AS Curve
M
AD1 AD3 YFE
Lieberman & Hall; Introduction to Economics, 2005
AD2
Real GDP
43
Figure 13 shows an example of a supply shock An increase in world oil prices that shifts aggregate supply curve
upward, from AS1 and AS2 Called negative supply shock, because of negative effect on output
output and increasing price level
Notice sharp contrast between effects of negative supply shocks and negative demand shocks in short-run Economists and journalists have coined term stagflation to describe
a stagnating economy experiencing inflation
Examples of positive supply shocks include unusually good weather, a drop in oil prices, and a technological change that lowers unit costs In addition, a positive supply shock can sometimes be caused by
government policy
44
R
P2 P1 P2 AD Y2
Lieberman & Hall; Introduction to Economics, 2005
AS3
YFE
Y3
Real GDP
45
What about effects of supply shocks in long-run? In some cases, we need not concern ourselves with this
question, because some supply shocks are temporary
In other cases, however, a supply shock can last for an extended period In long-run, economy self-corrects after a supply shock, just as it does after a demand shock When output differs from its full-employment level
Wage rate changes AS curve shifts until full employment is restored 46
Story of 1990-91 recession begins in mid1990, when Iraq invaded Kuwait During this conflict, Kuwaits oil was taken off
world market, as was Iraqs Reduction in oil supplies resulted in a rapid and substantial increase in price of oil
47
Story of 2001 recession was quite different This time, there was no spike in oil prices and no other significant
supply shock to plague economy Rather, there was a demand shock, and a Federal Reserve policy during the year before the recession that might have made it a bit worse
During late 1990s, Fed had become concerned that investment boom and consumer optimism were shifting AD curve rightward too rapidly Creating a danger that we would overshoot potential GDP and set off
higher inflation Fed responded by tightening money supply and raising interest rate Effects of this policy may have continued into early 2001, exacerbating decrease in investment that was occurring for other reasons
48
AD1990
3. and the price level to rise. Real GDP
Y2
YFE
49
Y2
Lieberman & Hall; Introduction to Economics, 2005
YFE
Real GDP
50
51
174
52
But in our two most recent recessions, economy experienced abnormal, prolonged periods during which employment did not grow at all Figure 16 illustrates behavior of employment during our two most recent recession
Vertical axis shows an employment indexemployment divided by employment at the trough Blue line shows that employment falls during the contraction phase of average cycle
But red and pink lines show what happened in first year of our most recent expansionsduring 1992 and 2002
number of jobs decreased during year
53
Figure 16: The Average Expansion Versus Two Recent Jobless Expansions
Employment 1.04 Index (Trough = 1) 1.03
1.02 1.01 1.00 After Average Recession After 2001 Recession
0.99
-6 -4 -2 0 +2 +4 +6 +8 +10 +12 Months Before and After the Trough
Lieberman & Hall; Introduction to Economics, 2005
54
Since story is similar for both of these expansions, lets focus on period from late 2001 to late 2002 the first year of expansion after our most recent recession Using equation for economic growth
Real GDP = productivity x average hours x (emp/pop) x
population
But equation can be used in different ways Now were using equation to account for deviations in
employment away from full employment in short-run
For this purpose, well need to make some adjustments to equation Real GDP = productivity x average hours x employment
55
Numbers in parentheses show actual percentage changes for each of these variables during 2002
56
Why didnt real GDP growth keep up with productivity? Because growth in real GDP was unusually low Productivity grew at about the same rate as average expansion, in
spite of the low growth in output Throughout period, firms were reluctant to hire full-time, permanent workers
Created uncertainty about strength and duration of expansion Instead, business expanded output by hiring part-time and temporary
workers
Why would this boost productivity? Enabled firms to adjust their workforce more easily to fluctuations in
production
Phrase jobless expansion refers to just part of expansion phase Eventually, employment catches upeven to higher levels of output
made possible by productivity growth
57