0% found this document useful (0 votes)
52 views29 pages

Chapter 9 Materiality and Risk

Uploaded by

john.malhotra420
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PPTX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
52 views29 pages

Chapter 9 Materiality and Risk

Uploaded by

john.malhotra420
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PPTX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd

Materiality and

Risk
Chapter 9

©2003 Prentice Hall Business Publishing, Auditing and Assurance Services 9/e, Arens/Elder/Beasley 9-1
Learning Objective 1

Apply the concept of


materiality to the audit.

©2003 Prentice Hall Business Publishing, Auditing and Assurance Services 9/e, Arens/Elder/Beasley 9-2
Materiality
The auditor’s responsibility is to determine whether
financial statements are materially misstated.
Also, if public, material weaknesses in I/Cs.
If there is a material misstatement,
the auditor will bring it to the client’s
attention so that a correction can be made.
SAS 89: Audit committee = backbone

©2003 Prentice Hall Business Publishing, Auditing and Assurance Services 9/e, Arens/Elder/Beasley 9-3
Steps in Applying
Materiality
Set preliminary
Step
judgment about
1
materiality (total).

Allocate preliminary
Step judgment about
2 Materiality to
segments (accounts) = tolerable misstatement
©2003 Prentice Hall Business Publishing, Auditing and Assurance Services 9/e, Arens/Elder/Beasley 9-4
Steps in Applying
Materiality

Step Estimate total


3 misstatement in segment.

Step Estimate the


4 combined misstatement.

Compare segment and combined


Step
estimate with judgments
5
about materiality.
©2003 Prentice Hall Business Publishing, Auditing and Assurance Services 9/e, Arens/Elder/Beasley 9-5
Learning Objective 2

Make a preliminary judgment


about what amounts to
consider material.

©2003 Prentice Hall Business Publishing, Auditing and Assurance Services 9/e, Arens/Elder/Beasley 9-6
Set Preliminary Judgment
Ideally, auditors decide early in the audit
the combined amount of misstatements
of the financial statements that would
be considered material.
This preliminary judgment is the maximum
amount by which the auditor believes the
statements could be misstated and still not
affect the decisions of reasonable users.
©2003 Prentice Hall Business Publishing, Auditing and Assurance Services 9/e, Arens/Elder/Beasley 9-7
Factors Affecting Judgment

Materiality is a relative rather


than an absolute concept.

Bases are needed for


evaluating materiality. What is the
key accounting variable? Sliding scale?

Qualitative factors also


affect materiality: IPO, Debt Covenant ratios.
©2003 Prentice Hall Business Publishing, Auditing and Assurance Services 9/e, Arens/Elder/Beasley 9-8
Learning Objective 3

Allocate preliminary materiality


to segments of the audit
during planning.

©2003 Prentice Hall Business Publishing, Auditing and Assurance Services 9/e, Arens/Elder/Beasley 9-9
Allocate Preliminary Judgment
About Materiality to
Segments

This is necessary because evidence is


accumulated by segments rather than
for the financial statements as a whole.
Most practitioners allocate materiality
to balance sheet accounts.
I/S and B/S accounts

©2003 Prentice Hall Business Publishing, Auditing and Assurance Services 9/e, Arens/Elder/Beasley 9 - 10
Learning Objective 4

Use materiality to evaluate


audit findings.

©2003 Prentice Hall Business Publishing, Auditing and Assurance Services 9/e, Arens/Elder/Beasley 9 - 11
Estimated Total
Misstatement Example

Net misstatement of the sample


÷ Total sampled
× Total recorded population value
= Direct projection estimate of misstatement
$3,500 ÷ $50,000 × $450,000 = $31,500
$3,500 = Known, $28,000 = Estimated

©2003 Prentice Hall Business Publishing, Auditing and Assurance Services 9/e, Arens/Elder/Beasley 9 - 12
Example of Estimate
for Sampling Error
Tolerable
Account Misstatement Projection Error/
Cash $ 4,000 $
Accounts receivable 20,000 12,000 6,00
Inventory 36,000 31,50
Total estimated
misstatement amount $43,500
Preliminary judgment
about materiality $60,000
*estimate for sampling error is 50%

So…..Adjustment: dr. Cost of Goods Sold 11,250


cr. Inventory
©2003 Prentice Hall Business Publishing, Auditing and Assurance Services 9/e, Arens/Elder/Beasley 9 - 13
Learning Objective 5

Define risk in auditing.

©2003 Prentice Hall Business Publishing, Auditing and Assurance Services 9/e, Arens/Elder/Beasley 9 - 14
Risk
Auditors accept some level of risk
in performing the audit.
An effective auditor recognizes that
risks exist, are difficult to measure,
and require careful thought to respond.
Responding to risks properly is critical
to achieving a high-quality audit.
Research – auditors better at risk
assessment, than risk response (testing)
©2003 Prentice Hall Business Publishing, Auditing and Assurance Services 9/e, Arens/Elder/Beasley 9 - 15
Risk and Evidence

Auditors use the audit risk model to further


identify the potential for misstatements
and where they are most likely to occur.

©2003 Prentice Hall Business Publishing, Auditing and Assurance Services 9/e, Arens/Elder/Beasley 9 - 16
Audit Risk Model
for Planning

PDR = AAR ÷ (IR × CR)

PDR = Planned detection risk (calculated)


AAR = Acceptable audit risk (set)
IR = Inherent risk (assessed)
CR = Control risk (determined)
©2003 Prentice Hall Business Publishing, Auditing and Assurance Services 9/e, Arens/Elder/Beasley 9 - 17
Learning Objective 6

Describe the audit risk


model and its components.

©2003 Prentice Hall Business Publishing, Auditing and Assurance Services 9/e, Arens/Elder/Beasley 9 - 18
Audit Risk Model
for Planning

PDR = AAR ÷ (IR × CR)

PDR = Planned detection risk (calculated) – by account


AAR = Acceptable audit risk (set) - engagement
IR = Inherent risk (assessed) – by account
CR = Control risk (determined) – by account
©2003Where
Prentice Hall are
BusinessBR andAuditing
Publishing, FR and
(engagement
Assurance Services 9/e,level)?????
Arens/Elder/Beasley 9 - 19
Learning Objective 7

Consider the impact of


engagement risk
on acceptable audit risk.

©2003 Prentice Hall Business Publishing, Auditing and Assurance Services 9/e, Arens/Elder/Beasley 9 - 20
Factors Affecting
Acceptable Audit Risk (set)

The degree of which external users


rely on the statements: legal, reputation, regulators
The likelihood that a client will have
financial difficulties after the
audit report is issued

©2003 Prentice Hall Business Publishing, Auditing and Assurance Services 9/e, Arens/Elder/Beasley 9 - 21
Factors Affecting
Acceptable Audit Risk

The auditor’s evaluation of


management’s integrity

©2003 Prentice Hall Business Publishing, Auditing and Assurance Services 9/e, Arens/Elder/Beasley 9 - 22
Making the Acceptable
Audit Risk Decision

Factors Methods to Assess Risk


• Examine financial statements.
External users •
Read minutes of the board.
reliance on •
Examine form 10K.
financial • Discuss financing plans
statements
with management.

©2003 Prentice Hall Business Publishing, Auditing and Assurance Services 9/e, Arens/Elder/Beasley 9 - 23
Making the Acceptable
Audit Risk Decision
Factors Methods to Assess Risk
• Analyze financial statements
Likelihood for difficulties using
of financial ratios.
difficulties • Examine inflows and
outflows of cash flow
• statements.
Anonymous Caller, Waste
Management Management • Non-Financial factors!!!!
cases. SEC letters
integrity and past audit disagreements. FR
©2003 Prentice Hall Business Publishing, Auditing and Assurance Services 9/e, Arens/Elder/Beasley 9 - 24
Learning Objective 8

Consider the impact of several


factors on the assessment
of inherent risk.

©2003 Prentice Hall Business Publishing, Auditing and Assurance Services 9/e, Arens/Elder/Beasley 9 - 25
Major Factors When
Assessing Inherent Risk

• Nature of the client’s business


• Results of previous audits
• Initial versus repeat engagement
• Related parties
• Fraud Risk
• Non-routine transactions
• Judgment

©2003 Prentice Hall Business Publishing, Auditing and Assurance Services 9/e, Arens/Elder/Beasley 9 - 26
Learning Objective 9

Discuss the relationship


of risks to audit evidence.

©2003 Prentice Hall Business Publishing, Auditing and Assurance Services 9/e, Arens/Elder/Beasley 9 - 27
Relationship of Risk Factors,
Risk, and Evidence
Acceptable audit risk

D D I
Factors Planned Planned
Inherent I I
Influencing detection audit
risk
Risks risk evidence
I D

Control risk
D = Direct relationship; I = Inverse relationship
©2003 Prentice Hall Business Publishing, Auditing and Assurance Services 9/e, Arens/Elder/Beasley 9 - 28
End of Chapter 9

©2003 Prentice Hall Business Publishing, Auditing and Assurance Services 9/e, Arens/Elder/Beasley 9 - 29

You might also like