Professional Documents
Culture Documents
ME-381
Dec. 5
Presentation Outline
Introduction and motivation Current MEMS systems in this area Our idea Conclusion
ME-381
Dec. 5
Why MEMS?
Cells and MEMS are in the similar scale Cells can survive on artificial surfaces The microfabrication technique is relatively mature
ME-381
Dec. 5
A bed of microneedles
ME-381
Dec. 5
Model I
In-situ adhesion studies of a single living bovine endothelial cell using MEMS sensor
The MEMS sensor consists of a cantilever beam made of Single Crystal Silicon (SCS), 1200 m long x 11.5 m deep x 4 m wide, coated by a thin native silicon dioxide layer.
ME-381
Dec. 5
Experimental System
1 m Resolution Liquid Media Tissue Culture Dish MEMS Cantilever X-Y-Z Stage
PiezoActuator 20 nm Resolution
1 m Resolution
Endothelial Cell
Microscope Objective
ME-381
Dec. 5
Experimental Result
The adhesion properties of a single living bovine endothelial cell was studied. Quantitatively it has been found that a focal adhesion site, prior to failure, applies 37 nN of force onto the MEMS sensor.
ME-381
Dec. 5
Focal adhesion
Procession of a breaking filopodia
ME-381
Dec. 5
Discussion
This work is one of the earliest studies on cell adhesion. The device is quite simple and they can measure the magnitude of the adhesion force This device doesnt have much control on the contact of the cell and the beam Can only measure the force form on contact region
ME-381
Dec. 5
Model II
Cells lying on a bed of microneedles: An approach to isolate mechanical force
ME-381
Dec. 5
Strategy
A strategy to independently manipulate mechanical compliance and surface chemistry: for small deflections, the deflection is directly proportional to the force applied by the attached cell
3EI F ! 3 H L
ME-381
Dec. 5
Fabrication
ME-381
Dec. 5
Fabrication Contd
ME-381
Dec. 5
Result
Both the magnitude and direction of the adhesion forces can be obtained
ME-381
Dec. 5
Advantages
Less assumptions Can capture the magnitude also the direction of the force at the same time The mechanical property of the substrate can be easily changed without change the material of the substrate
ME-381
Dec. 5
Disadvantage
The resolution of this model only in micrometer scale while the focal adhesion is also in this scale Improving the resolution means increasing the density of posts in the array, which leads to a high requirement of deflection measuring precision
ME-381
Dec. 5
Our idea
Use the membranes to measure the focal adhesion forces. As the deformation is vertical, the dots could be very close without any interactions
F
Fr 4 16 (d 7 v (d ! 4 2 Eh 3 1 v h 3 v
h 1
3
ME-381
Dec. 5
MEMS System
Fabricate an array of membranes on a silicon wafer. Those membranes will deform under cell adhesion
Cell
Membrane
Membrane
ME-381
Dec. 5
Fabrication process
Photolithograph Cast PDMS Electrical etching Microcontact printing
wafer1 wafer2
hydrophobic alkanethiol
ME-381
Dec. 5
Measurement
Use optical readout to detect the displacement of each membrane
Laser Beam
Discussion
Advantage Can improve the spatial resolution Can determine the adhesion force from each focal contact site. Disadvantage Cannot get the direction of the force Readout device is complicated
ME-381
Dec. 5
Conclusion
Introduced two MEMS system already used. Provided a new device, which needs experiment to prove With the size of device decreasing, NEMS system will act important roles in this area
ME-381
Dec. 5
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
ME-381
Dec. 5