Professional Documents
Culture Documents
By R.Masilamani
Contents
1.Whats Corporate finance2.Capital investment decisions 2.1 The investment decision 2.1.1 Project valuation 2.1.2 Valuing flexibility 2.1.3 Quantifying uncertainty 3. Working capital management 3.1 The financing decision 3.2 The dividend decision 3.3 Corporate finance theory and research 5.Alternate approaches 6.See also 4.Relatioship with other areas in finance 4.1 Investment banking 4.2 financial risk management 4.3 Personal and public finance
7.rferences
14/4/2012
Corporate finance is the area of finance dealing with monetary decisions that business enterprises make The tools and analysis used to make these decisions, and The primary goal of corporate finance is to maximize shareholder value
14/4/2012
14/4/2012
14/4/2012
14/4/2012
14/4/2012
10
14/4/2012
11
In general, each project's value will be estimated using a discounted cash flow (DCF) valuation, and the opportunity with the highest value, as measured by the resultant net present value (NPV) will be selected This requires estimating the size and timing of all of the incremental cash flows resulting from the project Such future cash flows are then discounted to determine their present value (see Time value of money). These present values are then summed, and this sum net of the initial investment outlay is the NPV.
14/4/2012 adapted from Wikipedia 14
The NPV is greatly affected by the discount rate. Thus, identifying the proper discount rate often termed, the project "hurdle rate"[5] is critical to making an appropriate decision. The hurdle rate is the minimum acceptable return on an investmenti.e. the project appropriate discount rate. The hurdle rate should reflect the riskiness of the investment, typically measured by volatility of cash flows, and must take into account the projectrelevant financing mix. Managers use models such as the CAPM or the APT to estimate a discount rate appropriate for a particular project, and use the weighted average cost
In many cases, for example R&D projects, a project may open (or close) various paths of action to the company, but this reality will not (typically) be captured in a strict NPV approach. Management will therefore (sometimes) employ tools which place an explicit value on these options. whereas in a DCF valuation the most likely or average or scenario specific cash flows are discounted, here the flexible and staged nature of the investment is modelled, and hence "all" potential payoffs are considered. The difference between the two valuations is the "value of flexibility" inherent in the project.
adapted from Wikipedia 16
14/4/2012
14/4/2012
17
Valuing flexibility
In conjunction with NPV, there are several other measures used as (secondary) selection criteria in corporate finance. These are visible from the DCF and include discounted payback period, IRR, Modified IRR, equivalent annuity, capital efficiency, and ROI. Alternatives (complements) to NPV include MVA / EVA (Joel Stern Stewart & Co) and APV (Stewart Myers). See list of valuation topics.
14/4/2012
18
14/4/2012
19
DTA values flexibility by incorporating possible events (or states) and consequent management decisions. (For example, a company would build a factory given that demand for its product exceeded a certain level during the pilot-phase, and outsource production otherwise. In turn, given further demand, it would similarly expand the factory, and maintain it otherwise. In a DCF model, by contrast, there is no "branching" each scenario must be modelled separately.)
adapted from Wikipedia 20
14/4/2012
In the decision tree, each management decision in response to an "event" generates a "branch" or "path" which the company could follow; the probabilities of each event are determined or specified by management. Once the tree is constructed: (1) "all" possible events and their resultant paths are visible to management;
(2) given this knowledge of the events that could follow, and assuming rational decision making, management chooses the actions corresponding to the highest value path probability weighted; (3) this path is then taken as representative of project value. See Decision theory#Choice under uncertainty
adapted from Wikipedia 21
14/4/2012
ROA is usually used when the value of a project is contingent on the value of some other asset or underlying variable. (For example, the viability of a mining project is contingent on the price of gold; if the price is too low, management will abandon the mining rights, if sufficiently high, management will develop the ore body. Again, a DCF valuation would capture only one of these outcomes.)
adapted from Wikipedia 22
14/4/2012
(1) using financial option theory as a framework, the decision to be taken is identified as corresponding to either a call option or a put option; (2) an appropriate valuation technique is then employed usually a variant on the Binomial options model or a bespoke simulation model,
while Black Scholes type formulae are used less often; see Contingent claim valuation.
(3) The "true" value of the project is then the NPV of the "most likely"
Given the uncertainty inherent in project forecasting and valuation, analysts will wish to assess the sensitivity of project NPV to the various inputs (i.e. assumptions) to the DCF model. In a typical sensitivity analysis the analyst will vary one key factor while holding all other inputs constant, ceteris paribus. The sensitivity of NPV to a change in that factor is then observed, and is calculated as a "slope": NPV / factor
adapted from Wikipedia 24
14/4/2012
A further advancement is to construct stochastic or probabilistic financial models as opposed to the traditional static and deterministic models as above. For this purpose, the most common method is to use Monte Carlo simulation to analyze the projects NPV.
This method was introduced to finance by David B. Hertz in 1964, although it has only recently become common: today analysts are even able to run simulations in spreadsheet based DCF models,
Achieving the goals of corporate finance requires that any corporate investment be financed appropriately. The sources of financing are, generically, capital self-generated by the firm and capital from external funders, obtained by issuing new debt and equity (and hybrid- or convertible securities). Since both hurdle rate and cash flows (and hence the riskiness of the firm) will be affected, the financing mix will impact the valuation of the firm (as well as the other long-term financial management decisions).
14/4/2012
27
financing decision
Continuing the above example: instead of assigning three discrete values to revenue growth, and to the other relevant variables, the analyst would assign an appropriate probability distribution to each variable (commonly triangular or beta), and, where possible, specify the observed or supposed correlation between the variables
14/4/2012
29
Whether to issue dividends,[17] and what amount, is calculated mainly on the basis of the company's unappropriated profit and its earning prospects for the coming year. The amount is also often calculated based on expected free cash flows i.e. cash remaining after all business expenses, and capital investment needs have been met
adapted from Wikipedia 30
14/4/2012
Most of the MBA level corporate finance falls under the umbrella of the Trade-Off Theory in which firms are assumed to trade-off the tax benefits of debt with the bankruptcy costs of debt when making their decisions. However economists have developed a set of alternative theories about financing decisions
14/4/2012
31
14/4/2012
32
14/4/2012
33
Decisions relating to working capital and short term financing are referred to as working capital management These involve managing the relationship between a firm's short-term assets and its short-term liabilities
14/4/2012
34
Working capital management decisions are therefore not taken on the same basis as long term decisions, and working capital management applies different criteria in decision making: the main considerations are:
(1) cash flow / liquidity and (2) profitability / return on capital (of which cash flow is probably the most important
14/4/2012
36
14/4/2012
38
Investment banking
14/4/2012
39
Risk management is the process of measuring risk and then developing and implementing strategies to manage ("hedge") that risk. Financial risk management, typically, is focused on the impact on corporate value due to adverse changes in commodity prices, interest rates, foreign exchange rates and stock prices (market risk). It will also play an important role in short term cash- and treasury management
14/4/2012
40
This area or risk is related to corporate finance in two ways: Firstly, firm exposure to business and market risk is a direct result of previous Investment and Financing decisions. Secondly, both disciplines share the goal of enhancing, or preserving, firm value.
14/4/2012
41
to partnerships, sole proprietorships, not-forprofit organizations, governments, mutual funds, and personal wealth management
adapted from Wikipedia 42
14/4/2012
Alternate Approaches
14/4/2012
43
Alternate Approaches
The approaches
standard assumption in Corporate finance is that shareholders are the residual claimants and that the primary goal of executives should be to maximize shareholder value. Recently, however, legal scholars (e.g. Lynn Stout [23]) have questioned this assumption, implying that the assumed goal of maximizing shareholder value is inappropriate for a public corporation.
This criticism in turn brings into question the advice of corporate finance, particularly related to stock buybacks made purportedly to "return value to shareholders," which is predicated on a legally erroneous assumption
14/4/2012
44
See also
Lists:
Business organizations Financial modeling Financial planning Investment bank Venture capital Right-financing Factoring (finance) adapted from Wikipedia 45
14/4/2012
References
14/4/2012
46
Capital structure
Senior secured debt Senior debt Second lien debt Subordinated debt Mezzanine debt Convertible debt Exchangeable debt Preferred equity Warrant Shareholder loan Common equity Pari passu /wiki/File:Met_life_tower_crop.jpg/wiki/File:Met_life_tower_crop.jpg
Transactions
(terms / conditions)
Equity offerings
Initial public offering (IPO) Secondary market offering (SEO) Follow-on offering Rights issue Private placement Spin out Equity carve-out Greenshoe (Reverse) Book building Bookrunner Underwriter
Mergers andacquisitions
Takeover Reverse takeover Tender offer Proxy fight Poison pill Staggered board Squeeze out Tag-along right Drag-along right Pre-emption right Control premium Due diligence Divestment Sell side Buy side Demerger Super-majority Pitch book
Leverage
Leveraged buyout Leveraged recap Financial sponsor Private equity Bond offering High-yield debt DIP financing Project finance Debt restructuring
Financial modeling
Free cash flow Business valuation Fairness opinion Stock valuation APV DCF Net present value (NPV) Cost of capital (Weighted average) Comparable company analysis Accretion/dilution analysis Enterprise value Tax shield Minority interest Associate company EVA MVA Terminal value Real options valuation
References Corporate Finance: First Principles, Aswath Damodaran, New York University's Stern School of Business ^ The framework for this section is based on Notes by Aswath Damodaran at New York University's Stern School of Business ^ See: Investment Decisions and Capital Budgeting, Prof. Campbell R. Harvey; The Investment Decision of the Corporation, Prof. Don M. Chance ^ See: Valuation, Prof. Aswath Damodaran; Equity Valuation, Prof. Campbell R. Harvey ^ See for example Campbell R. Harvey's Hypertextual Finance Glossary or investopedia.com ^ See: Real Options Analysis and the Assumptions of the NPV Rule, Tom Arnold & Richard Shockley ^ See: Decision Tree Analysis, mindtools.com; Decision Tree Primer, Prof. Craig W. Kirkwood Arizona State University ^ a b See: "Capital Budgeting Under Risk". Ch.9 in Schaum's outline of theory and problems of financial management, Jae K. Shim and Joel G. Siegel. ^ See:Identifying real options, Prof. Campbell R. Harvey; Applications of option pricing theory to equity valuation, Prof. Aswath Damodaran; How Do You Assess The Value of A Company's "Real Options"?, Prof. Alfred Rappaport Columbia University & Michael Mauboussin ^ a b See Probabilistic Approaches: Scenario Analysis, Decision Trees and Simulations, Prof. Aswath Damodaran ^ For example, mining companies sometimes employ the Hill of Value methodology in their planning; see, e.g., B. E. Hall, "How Mining Companies Improve Share Price by Destroying Shareholder Value" ^ See: Quantifying Corporate Financial Risk, David Shimko. ^ The Flaw of Averages, Prof. Sam Savage, Stanford University. ^ See: The Financing Decision of the Corporation, Prof. Don M. Chance; Capital Structure, Prof. Aswath Damodaran ^ Capital Structure: Implications, Prof. John C. Groth, Texas A&M University; A Generalised Procedure for Locating the Optimal Capital Structure, Ruben D. Cohen, Citigroup ^ See:Optimal Balance of Financial Instruments: Long-Term Management, Market Volatility & Proposed Changes, Nishant Choudhary, LL.M. 2011 (Business & finance), George Washington University Law School ^ See Dividend Policy, Prof. Aswath Damodaran ^ See The theory of Corporate Finance, Princeton University Press ^ See Working Capital Management, Studyfinance.com; Working Capital Management, treasury.govt.nz ^ See The 20 Principles of Financial Management, Prof. Don M. Chance, Louisiana State University ^ Beaney, Shaun, "Defining corporate finance in the UK", Corporate Finance Faculty, ICAEW, April 2005 (revised January 2011) ^ See: Global Association of Risk Professionals (GARP); Professional Risk Managers' International Association (PRMIA) ^ Lynn A. Stout (2002). Bad and Not-So-Bad Arguments for Shareholder Primacy, University of California, Los Angeles School of Law Research Paper No. 25; Lynn A. Stout (2007). The Mythical Benefits of Shareholder Control, REGULATION Spring 2007
Financial modeling
Free cash flow Business valuation Fairness opinion Stock valuation APV DCF Net present value (NPV) Cost of capital (Weighted average) Comparable company analysis Accretion/dilution analysis Enterprise value Tax shield Minority interest Associate company EVA MVA Terminal value Real options valuation
2. Transactions(terms / conditions)
Equity offerings. Initial public offering (IPO) Secondary market offering (SEO) Follow-on offering Rights issue Private placement Spin out Equity carve-out Greenshoe (Reverse) Book building Bookrunner Underwriter Mergers andacquisitions .Takeover Reverse takeover Tender offer Proxy fight Poison pill Staggered board Squeeze out Tag-along right Drag-along right Pre-emption right Control premium Due diligence Divestment Sell side Buy side Demerger Supermajority Pitch book
Leverage .Leveraged buyout Leveraged recap Financial sponsor Private equity Bond offering High-yield debt DIP financing Project finance Debt restructuring
3.Valuation
.Financial modeling Free cash flow Business valuation Fairness opinion Stock valuation APV DCF Net present value (NPV) Cost of capital (Weighted average) Comparable company analysis Accretion/dilution analysis Enterprise value Tax shield Minority interest Associate company EVA MVA Terminal value Real options valuation
14/4/2012
50
END
14/4/2012 adapted from Wikipedia 51