Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Definition
Performance appraisal is a systematic evaluation of individual with respect to his/her performance on the job and his/her potential for development.
Objectives
Provide basis for promotion, transfer, termination Enhancing employees effectiveness Identifying employees training and development needs Removing work alienation Developing interpersonal relationship Aiding wage administration Exercising control Improving communication
up a project team
3. Decide who is to be covered 4. Decide on whether the same approach should be adopted at each level
Set up project team Define role of HRD Decide whether to use outside consultants Define performance management process and documentation Plan implementation programme
Identification of key performance areas ( KPAs ) and target setting through periodic discussions between each employee and his boss Identification of qualities required for the present and future jobs in the company Self Appraisal by the appraise Performance Analysis to identify factors that have facilitated and factors that have hindered performance
Performance Discussion and counselling to understand each other and assist each other Identification of training needs Action planning and goal setting for future Final assessment by the supervising officer for administrative purposes
Key Performance Area - These are the areas within the ORGANIZATION FUNCTIONS, where an individual or group, is logically responsible / accountable for the results.
KRA 1 - RECRUITMENT/ SELECTION KPA 1 - RECRUITMENT KPI 1 - Average time taken per employee 2 months KPA 2 -SELECTION [ KPI = average cost per new employee RS 10,000]
KRA 3- PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT KPA 1 - PERFORMANCE APPRAISALS [KPI = all staff to be appraised at least once annually] KPA 2 -SUCCESSION PLANNING [ KPI = 8 POTENTAL staff to be identified and talent managed]
2. Identification of qualities required for the present and future jobs in the Company.
Self appraisal is the self evaluation where the employee himself gives the feedback or his views and points regarding his performance.
The employee himself critically analyses the performance, his strengths, weaknesses, accomplishments, problems faced, the training and development needs (if any) etc.
4. Performance Analysis
This is used to identify the factors that have facilitated and the factors that have hindered performance. The Appraise reflects about his performance and identifies factors that helped him doing whatever he has done and the factors that prevented him from doing better. He classifies these factors into a. factors within his control b. factors outside his control ( difficulties ). He then gives the analysis to supervising officer.
After Performance Analysis is done the appraise should reflect about his performance and prepare notes of his assessment. Fix a time for review discussion. Appraise Perspective : To know about perceptions , expectations, assessment of his boss & also to communicate about difficulties and ask for support. To know his strength and weakness.
Appraiser perspective : Opportunity to understand his subordinate. Helps him to identify mechanisms for development and performance improvement.
The PA would generally lead to the identification of developmental needs. If it is lack of capabilities, development of capabilities through training , on-the-job coaching.
7. Final Assessment
By this stage the Appraiser would have gone through understanding of his subordinates, his accomplishments , strengths and weakness, developmental needs. The final assessment should be shown to the employee.
Insuff. Rewards
Traditional Methods
Graphical Rating Scales Raking Method Paired Comparison Method Forced Distribution Method Checklist Method Critical Incidence Essay Appraisal Group Appraisal Confidential Reports
Parameters Attitude Job Knowledge Quality of Work Dependability Initiative Cooperative Quality of Work Coordination
Ratings
In this method, an employees quality and quantity of work is assessed in a graphic scale indicating different degrees of a particular trait. The factors taken into consideration include both the personal characteristics and characteristics related to the on-the-job performance of the employees.
For example a trait like Job Knowledge may be judged on the range of average, above average, outstanding or unsatisfactory.
Ranking Method
This is one of the oldest and simplest techniques of performance appraisal. In this method, the appraiser ranks the employees from the best to the poorest on the basis of their overall performance. It is quite useful for a comparative evaluation.
A B C D E
A -
B A -
C A C -
D A D C -
E A E E E -
To eliminate the element of bias from the raters ratings, the evaluator is asked to distribute the employees in some fixed categories of ratings like on a normal distribution curve. 10% - Excellent and Unsatisfactory 20% - Good and Below Average 40% - Average
Checklist Method
The rater is given a checklist of the descriptions of the behaviour of the employees on job. The checklist contains a list of statements on the basis of which the rater describes the on the job performance of the employees.
Designation: Y/N
2.
Does the employee behave courteously with his supervisors ? Y/N Does the employee maintain sound customer relationship Y/N Is the employee sincere in doing job ? Does he behave well with public outside ? Y/N ? Y/N
3.
4.
5.
In this method of performance appraisal, the evaluator rates the employee on the basis of critical events and how the employee behaved during those incidents. It includes both negative and positive points. The drawback of this method is that the supervisor has to note down the critical incidents and the employee behaviour as and when they occur.
Duties
Targets
DEPOSIT MOBILISATION Rs 1o lakhs lakhs Rs.3 lakhs from business lakhs CUSTOMER SERVICE Not Mobilised Rs. 2 lakhs from individuals
Prompt in disposing customers 5 mins for deposit Thrown the pass book
The description is an evaluation of the performance of any individual based on the facts and often includes examples and evidences to support the information. A major drawback of the method is the inseparability of the bias of the evaluator.
Group Appraisal
Done by group of appraisers.