- DocumentWilliam Ong Genato vs. Atty. Essex L. Silapan. a.C. No. 4078 - July 14, 2003uploaded byHan Sam
- DocumentYu vs Bondal AC No. 5534, January 17, 2005uploaded byHan Sam
- DocumentVenzon v. Atty. Peleo III, A.C. No. 9354, August 2019uploaded byHan Sam
- DocumentUy Chico vs. Union Life Assurance Society., 29 Phil. 163, No. 9231 January 6, 1915uploaded byHan Sam
- DocumentSaura, Jr. vs. Agdeppa, 325 SCRA 682, Adm. Case No. 4426, Adm. Case No. 4429 February 17, 2000uploaded byHan Sam
- DocumentUy Chico vs. Union Life Assurance Society., 29 Phil. 163, No. 9231 January 6, 1915uploaded byHan Sam
- DocumentSamson vs. Era, 701 SCRA 241, A.C. No. 6664 July 16, 2013uploaded byHan Sam
- DocumentHornilla vs. Salunat, 405 SCRA 220, A.C. No. 5804 July 1, 2003uploaded byHan Sam
- DocumentAniñon vs. Sabitsana, Jr., 669 SCRA 76, A.C. No. 5098 April 11, 2012uploaded byHan Sam
- DocumentGenerosa Buted and Benito Bolisay vs. Atty. Harold M. Hernando, A.C. No. 1359 October 17, 1991uploaded byHan Sam
- DocumentLinsangan vs. Tolentino, 598 SCRA 133, A.C. No. 6672 September 4, 2009uploaded byHan Sam
- DocumentMaturan vs. Gonzales, 287 SCRA 443, A.C. No. 2597 March 12, 1998uploaded byHan Sam
- DocumentChevron Phils. vs. BCDA , 630 SCRA 519uploaded byHan Sam
- DocumentAbra College v. Aquino 162 S 106 SCRAuploaded byHan Sam
- DocumentAmerican Bible Society vs. City of Manila, 101 Phil 386uploaded byHan Sam
- DocumentCentral Azucarera vs. CA, 20 SCRA 344uploaded byHan Sam
- DocumentCagayan Electric Power vs. CIR , 138 S 629uploaded byHan Sam
- DocumentWhat is Complementarity_ - National Courts, The ICC and the Struggle Against Impunityuploaded byHan Sam
- DocumentThe ICC Refrains From Affirming a General Ban on Amnesties in the Gaddafi Admissibility Appeal Decision – International Law Bloguploaded byHan Sam
- DocumentProsecution and Peace_ a Role for Amnesty Before the ICCuploaded byHan Sam
- DocumentReport 9 - The Relevance of 'A Situation' to the Admissibility and Selection of Cases Before the ICC - October 2009.pdfuploaded byHan Sam
- DocumentPreliminary Examination Phase Three - Admissibility _ Coalition for the International Criminal Courtuploaded byHan Sam
- DocumentLitigation Strategiesuploaded byHan Sam
- DocumentFactors Relevant for the Assessment of Sufficient Gravity in the ICC. Proceedings and the Elements of International Crimes - QIL QDIuploaded byHan Sam
- DocumentKeller SCJIL Complementarityuploaded byHan Sam
- DocumentTreaties, States Parties, And Commentaries - Statute of the International Criminal Court, 1998 - 17 - Issues of Admissibilityuploaded byHan Sam
- DocumentExhaustion of Domestic Remedies_Jurisdictionuploaded byHan Sam
- DocumentOpen Source Evidence and the International Criminal Courtuploaded byHan Sam
- DocumentECHR Admissibilityuploaded byHan Sam
- DocumentJustice in the Balanceuploaded byHan Sam
- DocumentHansenuploaded byHan Sam
- DocumentEstablishing Admissibility at the International Criminal Court_ Duploaded byHan Sam
- DocumentAdmissibility Challenge - Ne Bis in Idem in 'New Zealand - ICC Act'uploaded byHan Sam
- Document19.4 Cebu Country Club vs. Elizagaqueuploaded byHan Sam
- Document19.3 Uypitching vs. Quaimcouploaded byHan Sam
- Document9.1 Silverio vs. Republic.docxuploaded byHan Sam
- Document20.1 Buenaventura vs. CA.docxuploaded byHan Sam
- Document15.5 Republic vs. Orbecido IIIuploaded byHan Sam
- Document15.2 Van Dorn vs. Romillo Jr.uploaded byHan Sam
- Document15.6 Bellis vs. Bellisuploaded byHan Sam
- Document19.1 Sps. Custodio vs. CAuploaded byHan Sam
- Document14.1 Del Socorro vs Wilsem (15.1,17.2)uploaded byHan Sam
- Document15.3 Pilapil vs. Ibay-Somerauploaded byHan Sam
- Document15.4 Garcia-Recio vs. Reciouploaded byHan Sam
- Document15.8 Aznar vs. Garciauploaded byHan Sam
- Document21.2 Gashem Shookat Baksh vs. CAuploaded byHan Sam
- Document4.3 Quiao vs. Quiaouploaded byHan Sam
- Document6.2 Guy vs. CAuploaded byHan Sam
- Document2.2 Tañada vs. Tuverauploaded byHan Sam