Welcome to Scribd, the world's digital library. Read, publish, and share books and documents. See more
Download
Standard view
Full view
of .
Save to My Library
Look up keyword
Like this
18Activity
0 of .
Results for:
No results containing your search query
P. 1
tower

tower

Ratings: (0)|Views: 498 |Likes:
Published by sunchuanzheng

More info:

Published by: sunchuanzheng on Apr 12, 2009
Copyright:Attribution Non-commercial

Availability:

Read on Scribd mobile: iPhone, iPad and Android.
download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
See more
See less

06/13/2013

pdf

text

original

 
Journal of Mechanical Science and Technology 22 (2008) 829~834
(
期刊机械科学与技术
22
2008
829
 
834)
Journal of 
Mechanical
Science andTechnology
杂志学和
www.springerlink.com/content/1738-494x
Calculation method and control value of static stiffness of tower crane
(
计算方法和控制价值静刚度塔式起重机
)
Lanfeng Yu
*
 Research Institute of Mechanical Engineering, Southwest JiaoTong University, Chengdu, Sichuan, 610031, P. R. China
(Manuscript Received August 31, 2006; Revised November 30, 2007; Accepted December 13, 2007)
研究机械工程学院,西南交通大学,四川成都,
610031
中华人民共和国
:2007 2006
8
31
;
;
接受
2007
12
13
号)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Abstract
The static stiffness of tower cranes is studied by using the proposed formulations and finite element method in this
 paper. A reasonable control value based on theoretical calculation and finite element method is obtained and verifiedvia collected field data. The results by finite element method are compared with the collected field data and that by the proposed formula. Corresponding to theoretical formulations and field data, it is found that the results by finite element
method are closer to the real data.
 Keywords
: Tower crane; Static stiffness; Control value; Static displacement
摘要静刚度研究塔式起重机使用建议配方和有限元法在这文件。合理控制值的基础上的理论计算和有限元方法得到验证通过收集现场数据。结果用有限元法进行了比较所收集的实地数据,并在拟议公式。相应的理论公式和现场数据,发现结果的有限元方法更接近真实的数据。关键词:塔式起重机静态刚度控制值
;
静态位移
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1. Introduction
Sagirli, Bococlu and Omurlu (2003) realized thesimulation of a rotary telescopic crane byutilizing anexperimental actual system for geometrical and dy-namical parameters [1]. With the intention of compar-ing the real system and the model and of verifyingthesufficiency of the model accuracy, various scenarioswere defined corresponding to different loading andoperating conditions. Of the scenarios defined, im- pulse response, time response and static response areused to experimentally gather such system parametersand variables as damping coefficient,
 
cylinder dis- placements, and stiffness of the telescopic boom,respectively. Following are the simulations for twodissimilar scenarios which are static response andimpulse response and the results that were presented.Barrett and Hrudey (1996) performed a series of testson a bridge crane to investigate how the peak dy-namic response during hoisting is affected by thestiffness of the crane structure, the inertial propertiesof the crane structure, the stiffness of the cable-slingsystem, the payload mass, and the initial conditions
for the hoisting operation [2]. These factors were
*
Corresponding author. Tel.: +86 28 8760 4460, Fax.: +86 28 8760 0816E-mail address: jdlf2000@sohu.com
DOI 10.1007/s12206-007-1217-0
 
obtained for displacements, accelerations, cable ten-sion, bridge bending moment, and end truck wheelreactions. Values for the dynamic ratio, defined as peak dynamic value over corresponding static value,are presented for displacements, bridge bending mo-ment, and end truck wheel reactions. A two degree of freedom analytical model is presented, and theoreticalvalues for the dynamic ratio are calculated as a func-tion of three dimensionless parameters that character-ize the crane and payload system. Grierson (1991)considered the design under static loads whereby themembers of the structure are automatically sized byusing commercial steel sections in full conformancewith design standard provisions for elastic strength/stability and stiffness [3]. This problem was illus-trated for the least-weight design of a steel mill craneframework comprised of a variety of member typesand subject to a number of load effects. Huang et al(2005, 2006, 2007) analyzed the static and dynamiccharacteristics of mechanical and structural systemsusing fuzzy and neural network methods [4-11].For static stiffness of a tower crane, the require-ments of GB 3811-1983 “Design rules for cranes”and GB/T 13752-1992 “Design rules for tower cranes” of China are as follows. “Under the rated load,the horizontal static displacement of the tower crane
 
830
 L. Yu / Journal of Mechanical Science and Technology 22 (2008) 829~834
 body at the connection place with the jib (or at the place of rotary column with the jib) should be nolarger than
 H 
/100. In which
 H 
is the vertical distanceof the tower body of the rail-mounted tower cranefrom the jib connection place to the rail surface, andthe vertical distance from the jib connection place of the attached tower crane to the highest adhesion point”.In this paper a special research on the static stiff-ness of tower cranes was carried out aimed at reliev-ing the over-strict control on the static stiffness (
 H 
/100) in the rules above, so as to meet the require-ment for revising GB/T 3811-1983 “Design rules for cranes”.The remainder of this paper is organized as follows.Section 2 gives the suggested control value of staticstiffness of a tower crane. Section 3 verifies the staticstiffness control value. Theoretical calculation methodof static displacement of the tower body correspond-ing to the static stiffness control value is provided inSection 4. Section 5 compares various methods for calculation of static displacement with the actuallymeasured values. A brief conclusion is given in Sec-tion 6.
2. The suggested control value of static stiff-
ness of tower crane
Because of the wide use of high-strength steel, it isnot difficult to meet the structural strength and stabil-ity. Requirements on structural stiffness are becominga dominant factor restricting tower crane developmentof towards the lightweight. The revised control valueof static stiffness of tower crane should not only meetrequirements of the current product development, butalso should be suitable for future development. Basedon the actual situation in China to ensure tower cranequality, so that design and inspection of the tower crane could have rules to follow, proper widening of the control value of static stiffness is the inevitabletrend.On the basis of a large number of investigationsand visits to tower crane manufacturers and users, Yu,Wang, Zheng, and Wang proposed the recommendedthe control value of the tower crane static stiffnessand the corresponding inspection method, i.e., takingthe hinge-connection point of the jib end under no-load condition (at this moment there is an absolute backward displacement of the jib end hinge-connection point in relation to the theoretic centerlineof the non-deformed tower body as shown in Fig.1)as the reference, and taking the absolute displacementat the jib end hinge-connection point after loadingas the measurement value of static displacement. Thisvalue will be used to measure the static stiffness [12].For measuring static displacement this is the methodused in inspection and acceptance of the tower crane.This value can be easily measured, and the measuredvalue has basically eliminated the verticality devia-tion of the tower crane. Yu, Wang, Zheng, and Wangrecommended that the static displacement controlvalue corresponding to this measuring method is1.33H/100, i.e., the static stiffness control value is1/3rd larger than the control value specified in thementioned “rules” [12].According to opinion of the experts of “Appraisal& evaluation meeting on special research projectRevision of Rules on Crane Design,” Yu, Wang,Zheng, and Wang recommended that the static stiff-ness control value is a proper limit value meeting thevoice of the tower crane industry for revising andwidening the limit value [12]. Moreover, thismethod is convenient for inspection. However, inorder to be consistent with the coefficient value speci-fied in international standard, it is recommended totake the static stiffness control value of the tower crane (1.34/100)
 H 
.Widening the static stiffness control value (1.34
 H 
/100) of the tower crane can reduce the tower crane production cost, so that the tower crane can developtowards lightweight in favor of the technical progressof this industry.
 
Fig. 1. Schematic diagram of staticdisplacement of the tower crane
.

Activity (18)

You've already reviewed this. Edit your review.
1 hundred reads
1 thousand reads
kamalaraja liked this
Sothoan Pro ÐG liked this
dundi_kumar liked this
dundi_kumar liked this
brunogmurakami liked this
Noetar Noe liked this
giridharrajug1 liked this

You're Reading a Free Preview

Download
/*********** DO NOT ALTER ANYTHING BELOW THIS LINE ! ************/ var s_code=s.t();if(s_code)document.write(s_code)//-->