Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Bush practiced during this two terms as president, 2001-2009. It was the basis for the American invasion of Iraq in 2003.
Neoconservative Framework
The Bush Doctrine grew from neoconservative dissatisfaction with President Bill Clinton's handling of the Iraqi regime of Saddam Hussein in the 1990s. The U.S. had beaten Iraq in the 1991 Gulf War. That war's goals, however, were limited to forcing Iraq to abandon its occupation of Kuwait and did not include toppling Hussein. Many neocnservatives, and indeed many Americans in general, were unhappy that the U.S. did not depose Hussein. Post-war peace terms also dictated that Hussein allow United Nations inspectors to periodically search Iraq for evidence of programs to build weapons of mass destruction (WMD), which could include chemical or nuclear weapons. Hussein repeatedly angered neo-cons as he stalled or prohibited U.N. inspections.
With Us or Against Us
After Al Qaeda terrorists attacked the World Trade Center and Pentagon on September 11, 2001, the Bush Doctrine took on a new dimension. That night, Bush told Americans that, in fighting terrorism, the U.S. would not distinguish between terrorists and nations that harbor terrorists. Bush expanded on that when he addressed a joint session of Congress on September 20. He said, "We will pursue nations that provide aid or safe haven to terrorism. Every nation, in every region, now has a decision to make. Either you are with us, or you are with the terrorists. From this day forward, any nation that continues to harbor or support terrorism will be regarded by the United States as a hostile regime." In October 2001, U.S. and allied troops invaded Afghanistan, where intelligence indicated the Taliban government was harboring Al Qaeda.
Preventive War
In January 2002 Bush's foreign policy headed toward one of preventive war. Bush described Iraq, Iran, and North Korea as an "axis of evil" that supported terror and sought WMD. He said, "We'll be deliberate, yet time is not on our side. I will not wait on events, while dangers gather. I will not stand by, as peril draws closer and closer. The United States of America will not permit the world's most dangerous regimes to threaten us with the world's most destructive weapons." As Washington Post columnist Dan Froomkin commented, Bush was putting a new spin on a traditional war policy. "Preemption has in fact been a staple of our foreign policy for ages -- and other countries' as well," he said. "The twist Bush put on it was embracing 'preventive' war: Taking action well before an attack was imminent -- invading a country that was simply perceived as threatening." By the end of 2002, the Bush administration was talking openly about the possibility of Iraq possessing WMD and reiterating that it harbored and supported terrorists. That rhetoric indicated that the "hawks" who had written Clinton in 1998 now held sway in the Bush cabinet. A U.S.-led coalition invaded Iraq in March 2003, quickly toppling Hussein's regime.
Legacy
A bloody insurgency against American occupation of Iraq and U.S. inability to quickly prop up a working democratic government hurt the Bush Doctrine. Most damaging was the absence of weapons of mass destruction in Iraq. Any "preventive war" doctrine relies on good intelligence, but the absence of WMD highlighted a problem of faulty intelligence. The Bush Doctrine essentially died in 2006. By then the army in Iraq was focusing on damage repair and pacification, and the military preoccupation with Iraq had enabled the Taliban in Afghanistan to reverse American successes. In November, public dissatisfaction with the wars enabled Democrats to reclaim control of Congress. It also forced Bush to usher the "hawks" -- most notably Rumsfeld -- out of his cabinet.