ESYE 562

fuzzy set theory

& fuzzy madm

Dilek KAPTANOLU

Introduction to Fuzzy Set Theory

In 1965 to deal with vagueness of human
thought, Lotfi A. Zadeh first introduced the
fuzzy set theory.
Fuzzy set theory is developed for solving
problems in which the descriptions of activities
and observations are imprecise, vague, and
uncertain.
For example one can assign a person seven-feet
tall to the class of tall men but it would be
hard to justify the inclusion or exclusion of a
six-feet tall person to that class. The term
tall does not define a boundry.
UC Berkeley, 2006

Introduction to Fuzzy Set Theory

Characteristic functions A: X {0,1} induce a constraint with
well-defined boundaries on the elements of the universe X that
can be assigned to a set A. The fundamental idea of fuzzy set is
to relax this requirement by admitting intermediate values of
class membership. Therefore, we may assign intermediate values
between 0 and 1 to quantify our perception on how compatible
these values are with the class with 0 meaning incompatibility
(complete exclusion) and 1 compatibility (complete
membership). Membership values thus express the degrees to
which each element of a universe is compatible with the
properties distinctive to the class. Intermediate membership
values means that no natural threshold exists and that elements
of a universe can be a member of a class and at the same time
belong to other classes with different degrees. Gradual, less
strict membership degrees are the essence of fuzzy sets.

Introduction to Fuzzy Set Theory

A fuzzy set A is described by a membership function mapping
the elements of a universe X to the unit interval [0,1] (Zadeh,
(x) : X [0,1]
1965):

Fuzzy sets and their membership functions.

Introduction to Fuzzy Set Theory

As shown in the figure above x1 = 1.5 is compatible with the

concept of short and x2 = 1.8 belongs to the category of tall
people (when assuming the model of sets), but x1 is 0.8
short and 0.2 tall and x2 is 0.6 short and 0.6 tall when
assuming a perspective of fuzzy sets.

Membership Functions
Formally speaking, any function A : X [0 ,1]
( (x) : X [0,1] )
could be qualified to serve as a membership function describing
the corresponding fuzzy set. In practice, the form of the
membership functions should be reflective of the problem at
hand for which we construct fuzzy sets. They should mirror our
perception of the concept to be represented and used in
problem solving, the level of detail we intend to capture, and
the context in which the fuzzy set are going to be used. It is also
essential to assess the type of a fuzzy set from the standpoint of
its suitability when handling the ensuing optimization
procedures. Given these criteria in mind, we elaborate on the
most commonly used categories of membership functions. All of
them are defined in the universe of real numbers, which is X = R

Triangular Membership Functions

Using the more concise
notation, the expression on
the left can be written in
the form
A(x,a,m, b) = max {min[(x a)/(m a), (b x)/(b m)],0}.

The meaning of the parameters is

straightforward: m denotes a modal
(typical) value of the fuzzy set whereas a
and b are the lower and upper bounds,
respectively. They could be sought as the
extreme elements of the universe of
discourse that delineate the elements
belonging to A with nonzero membership
degrees.

Operations with TFNs

Let 1= (l1, m1, u1) & 2= (l2, m2, u2) be two TFN s;
addition

1 2 = (l1 + l2, m1 + m2, u1 + u2)

multiplication

1 2 = (l1 x l2, m1 x m2, u1 x u2)

division

1 2 = (l1 / u2, m1 / m2, u1 / l2)

negation

- 1 = (- l1 , - m1 , - u1)

inverse

1/ 1 (1/u1 , 1/m1 , 1/l1)

natural logarithm ln( 1 ) (ln(l1 ), ln(m1), ln(u1))

exponential

exp( 1 ) (exp(l1 ), exp(m1), exp(u1))

Trapezoidal Membership Functions

Using the more concise notation, the above expression can

be written in the form

Some Other Membership Functions

Examples of quantities and fuzzy

quantities

Introduction to Fuzzy Set Theory

An example of the linguistic variable temperature.

The notion of the linguistic variable plays a major role in

applications of fuzzy sets. In fuzzy logic and approximate
reasoning, truth values can be viewed as linguistic variables
whose truth values form the term set as, for example, true, very
true, false, more or less true, and the like.

Some definitions related to Fuzzy

Set Theory
The support of a fuzzy set A, denoted by Supp(A), is a set of all
elements of X with nonzero membership degrees in A.
In other words, support identifies all elements of X that exhibit
some association with the fuzzy set under consideration (by being
allocated to A with nonzero membership degrees).
The core of a fuzzy set A, Core(A), is a set of all elements of the
universe that are typical to A, that is, they come with membership
grades equal to 1,

Some definitions related to Fuzzy

Set Theory

The support and core are related in the sense that they identify
and collect elements belonging to the fuzzy set yet at two
different levels of membership. Given the character of the core
and support, we note that all elements of the core of A are
subsumed by the elements of the support of this fuzzy set. Note
that both support and core are sets and not fuzzy sets.

Support and core of A.

Some definitions related to Fuzzy

Set Theory

The -cut of a fuzzy set A, denoted by A, is a set consisting of the

elements of the universe whose membership values are equal to or
exceed a certain threshold level where [0 ,1]. Formally speaking,
we have A = {xX|A(x) }. A strong -cut differs from the -cut in
the sense that it identifies all elements in X for which we have the
following equality: A+ = {xX|A(x) > }.
An illustration of the concept of the -cut and strong -cut is
presented below. Both support and core are limit cases of a-cuts and
strong -cuts. For = 0 and the strong -cut, we arrive at the concept
of the support of A. The threshold = 1 means that the corresponding
-cut is the core of A.

Examples of -cut and strong -cut.

Operations with Fuzzy Sets

The union of fuzzy sets 1 & 2

1 2 ( x) = 1 ( x) 2 ( x) = max( 1 ( x), 2 ( x))

(x)

The intersection of fuzzy sets 1 & 2

1

1(x)

2(x)
1 2 ( x)

1 2 ( x) = 1 ( x) 2 ( x) = min( 1 ( x), 2 ( x))

The complement of fuzzy set

(x)

c ( x) = 1 ( x)

c(x)
0

(x)
x

2(x)
1 2 ( x )

1(x)

Ranking Fuzzy Numbers

When fuzzy data are incorporated into the MADM problem, the final
ratings are no longer crisp numbers; they are fuzzy numbers. (Chen &
Hwang, 1992).
Since a fuzzy number represents many possible real numbers that
have different membership values, it is not easy to compare the final
ratings to determine which alternative is preferred.
To solve this problem, many researchers have proposed various fuzzy
ranking techniques to be able to compare fuzzy numbers. A detailed
review of Fuzzy Ranking Methods can be found in Fuzzy Multiple
Attribute Decision Making by Chen & Hwang.
Each fuzzy ranking method in literature has its own advantages and
disadvantages. So it is really difficult to decide which one is the best.
Of course different fuzzy ranking methods may lead to different
results.

Some Fuzzy Ranking Methods

1. Liou & Wangs Method (Liou, T.S. and Wang, M.J.,1992)
2. Abdel-Kader & Dugdales Method (Abdel-Kader, M.G.,
and Dugdale, D., 2001)
3. Chens Method (Chen, S.H., 1985)
4. Chen & Hwangs Method (Chen, S.J., and Hwang, C.L.,
1992)
5. Yagers Area Measurement Method (Yager, R.R, 1981)

Liou & Wangs Method

(Liou ve Wang, 1992)

In Liou ve Wangs integral value method; where

[0,1] is the optimism index, For TFN = (l,m,u) ,
total integral value is calculated as follows:

The index of optimism, represents the degree of optimism

of the decision maker. A larger indicates a higher degree
of optimism. For TFN s, i & j we can say:
then
i < j
if

then

i = j

then

i > j

if
if

Abdel-Kader & Dugdales Method

(Abdel-Kader & Dugdale, 1998)
According to Abdel-Kader & Dugdale, a fuzzy number can be divided into three
parts: (1) Full memberships, (2) partial memberships located in the right-hand
side, and (3) partial memberships located in the left-hand side. As in Liou &
Wangs method, again an optimism index, [0,1] is used.
For TFN s 1 = (l1,m1,u1) , 2 = (l2,m2,u2) & 3 = (l3,m3,u3);
S=( l1, m1, u1, l2, m2, u2, l3, m3, u3) and
V(k) be the value of k ;

here

xmin = inf S
xmax = sup
S

Abdel-Kader & Dugdales Method

(Abdel-Kader & Dugdale, 1998)
Example: Let 1 = (0.47, 0.78, 1.14) , 2 = (0.22, 0.65, 1.00)
and 3 = (0.08, 0.38, 0.71) be three TFN s
S = {0.08, 0.22, 0.38, 0.47, 0.65, 0.71, 0.78, 1.00, 1.14}
and xmin = 0.08 ,

0.49 > 0.34 >0.13

xmax = 1.14

As a result we have 1 >2 >3

Fuzzy AHP Methods

There are many fuzzy AHP methods proposed by various
authors. These methods are systematic approaches to the
alternative selection by using the concepts of fuzzy set theory
and hierarchical structure analysis.
The earliest work in fuzzy AHP appeared in Van Laarhoven and

Pedrycz (1983), which compared fuzzy ratios described by

triangular membership functions.
Buckley (1985) determines fuzzy priorities of comparison ratios

whose membership functions trapezoidal.

Chang (1996) introduces a new approach for handling fuzzy AHP,

with the use of triangular fuzzy numbers for pairwise comparison

scale off uzzy AHP, and the use ofthe extent analysis method for
the synthetic extent values of the pairwise comparisons.

Comparison of Fuzzy AHP

Techniques

By Bykzkan, Kahraman & Ruan, 2004

Some Fuzzy AHP Applications

Evaluation of weapon systems (Chen, 1996),

Application of fuzzy multicriteria decision making model for shipping company

performance evaluation (Chou ve Liang, 2001),

Multi attribute comparison of catering service companies using fuzzy AHP

(Kahraman et al., 2004)

Evaluating naval tactical missile systems by fuzzy AHP (Cheng, 1996 and
Cheng, 1999),

A decision support system for locating convenience store through fuzzy AHP
(Kuo et al., 1999),

Evaluating tourist risks from fuzzy perspectives (Tsaur et al., 1997),

Evaluation of airline service quality (Tsaur ve di., 2002),

Fuzzy multi criteria decision making procedure for evaluating advanced

manufacturing system investments (Karsak ve Tolga, 2001),

Evaluating design alternatives in mechanical engineering (Knosola ve Pedryez,

1992),

Fuzzy group decision making for selection among computer integerated

manufacturing systems (Bozda et al., 2003)

Changs Fuzzy AHP by Extent

Analysis
Let X = {x1,x2,...,xn},

be an object set and

U = {u1,u2,...,un}, be a goal set. According to the method

of Changs (1992) extent analysis, each object is taken and
extent analysis for each goal,
gi; is performed, respectively. Therefore, m extent analysis
values for each object can be obtained, with the following
signs:
i=1,2,......,n
where all the

are TFN s.

Changs Fuzzy AHP by Extent

Analysis
Step 1: The value of fuzzy synthetic extent with respect to the ith object is
defined as:

Changs Fuzzy AHP by Extent

Analysis
Step 2: The degree of possibility of
M2 = (l2,m2,u2) M1 = (l1,m1,u1)

is defined as follows:

V ( M 2 M 1 ) = sup min M1 ( x), M 2 ( y )

y x

and can be equivalently expressed as follows:

Changs Fuzzy AHP by Extent

Analysis

And we can show V(M2 M1) in the following figure where

d is the ordinate of the highest intersection point D,
between M1 and M2

M2

M1

V(M2 1)
0

l2

m2

l1 d

u2 m
1

u1

To compare M1 and M2 we need both values of V(M2

M1) and V(M1 M2).

Changs Fuzzy AHP by Extent

Analysis

Step 3: The degree possibility for a convex fuzzy number to be greater than k convex
fuzzy numbers Mi (i= 1,2,...,k) can be defined by
V(M M1, M2,...,Mk) = V [(M M1)
and V(M M2) and ..... and V(M Mk)]
= min V(M Mi),

i=1,2,....,k

d(Ai) = min V(Si Sk),

For k=1,2,..,n; ki Then the weight vector is given by
W=(d(A1),d(A2),....,d(An))T
where Ai (i=1,2,...,n) are n elements.
Step 4: Normalized weight vectors are as follows
W=(d(A1),d(A2),....,d( An))T
where W is a nonfuzzy number.

Fuzzy Degrees of Importance

Used
LINGUISTIC VALUE

FUZZY MEASURE

INVERSE MEASURE

Equally important

(1,1,1)

(1/1, 1/1, 1/1)

Weakly more important

(1, 3, 5)

(1/5,1/3, 1/1)

Strongly more important

(3, 5, 7)

(1/7, 1/5, 1/3)

Demonstratively more imp.

(5, 7, 9)

(1/9, 1/7, 1/5)

Absolutely more important

(7, 9, 9)

(1/9, 1/9, 1/7)

Application Changs Fuzzy

AHP, with Different Rankings
for Faculty Performance
Evaluating
the performance
of faculty
Evaluation
Problem
members is an important MADM
problem. Three main criteria of the
problem are:
Teaching (E)
Research (A)
Service (H)

Duration of the position

Managerial

SERVICE

Administrative Duties
Committee member
Professional Associations

Author
Currency of subject
Chapter author
# of pages written
Books written in other languages

Books

Book translations

Editor
Currency of subject

Faculty Performance Evaluation

# of pages translated
Lecture notes

Books in Turkish

Author
Currency of subject

Competition juries

Chapter author
International

Patents / rewards

# of pages written
Editor

National
Scientific meeting organization

RESEARCH

J ournal editorial board/ referee

Managed research projects

SCI J ournals

Printed scientific reports

Other international journals

Papers printed

National refereed journals

# of authors
# of papers
Continuity
National other journals
From his/ her papers
I nternational (SCI) impact factor

# of authors
From others
Complete paper

# of papers

Summary

Continuity

International conferences
Papers presented
National conferences
Courses taught

Poster
Master thesis

Thesis supervised

TEACHING

PhD thesis
PhD J uries
Student evaluations

Duration of the position

Managerial

SERVICE

Administrative Duties
Committee member
Professional Associations

Author
Currency of subject
Chapter author
# of pages written
Books written in other languages

Books

Book translations

Editor
Currency of subject

Faculty Performance Evaluation

# of pages translated
Lecture notes

Books in Turkish

Author
Currency of subject

Competition juries

Chapter author
International

Patents / rewards

# of pages written
Editor

National
Scientific meeting organization

RESEARCH

J ournal editorial board/ referee

Managed research projects

SCI J ournals

Printed scientific reports

Other international journals

Papers printed

National refereed journals

# of authors
# of papers
Continuity
National other journals
From his/ her papers
I nternational (SCI) impact factor

# of authors
From others
Complete paper

# of papers

Summary

Continuity

International conferences
Papers presented
National conferences
Courses taught

Poster
Master thesis

Thesis supervised

TEACHING

PhD thesis
PhD J uries
Student evaluations

Let us look at just one

portion...
Papers
international
meetings

national
meetings

summary

paper

Poster

summary

paper

Poster

number of
authors

number of
papers

continuity

number of
authors

number of
papers

continuity

Application
Fuzzy pairwise comparisons matrix wrt main criteria

By using the data in the table above and Changs Step 1, the synthetic
extent values are calculated as shown below.
SS= (1.24, 1.31, 1.45) (1/23.14, 1/18.47, 1/13.70) = (0.054, 0.071, 0.106)
SR= (7.00, 9.33, 12.08) (1/23.14, 1/18.47, 1/13.70) = (0.302, 0.502, 0.882)
ST= (5.46, 7.84, 9.61) (1/23.14, 1/18.47, 1/13.70) = (0.236, 0.424, 0.701)

Application
Calculations are as follows:
1.00
5.00
3.98

1.00
9.00
7.61

0.11
1.00
0.48

0.14
1.00
0.75

0.20
1.00
1.00

9.98 14.08 17.61

1.59

1.90

2.20

2.13

+
+
+

2.65
2.49
3.33

=
=
=

13.70
18.47
23.14

13.96
14.08
17.61

1.00
7.00
6.08

+
+
+

25.22
1.90
2.20

0.13
1.00
1.00

0.16
1.33
1.00

0.25
2.08
1.00

2.49

3.33

1.24 1.31 1.45

7.00 9.33 12.08
5.46 7.84 9.61

Application

SH= (0.054, 0.071, 0.106)

SA= (0.302, 0.502, 0.882)
SE= (0.236, 0.424, 0.701)

V(SH>=SA) =
V(SH>=SE) =
V(SA>=SH) =
V(SA>=SE) =
V(SE>=SH) =
V(SE>=SA) =

0.00
0.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
0.83*

V(SE>=SA) =

0.302 0.701
= 0.83
0.424 0.701 0.502 + 0.302

d(H) = min (0.00, 0.00) = 0.00

d(A) = min (1.00, 1,00) = 1.00
d(E) = min (1.00, 0.83) = 0.83
w = (0.00, 1.00, 0.83)T (Chang)
The normalized weight vector is:
w = (0.00/1.83, 1.00/1.83, 0.83/1.83)
w = (0.00, 0.54, 0.45)T

Application
Instead of Changs if we find the same weight vector by
using Liou Wangs method (for = 0.5), we have:

I T (H) =

1
[ 0.5 0.106 + 0.071 + (1 0.5) 0.054] = 0.076
2

1
[ 0.5 0.882 + 0.502 + (1 0.5) 0.302] = 0.547
2
1
I T (E) = [ 0.5 0.701 + 0.424 + (1 0.5) 0.236] = 0.446
2

I T (A) =

Then we normalize as follows :

0.076 + 0.547 + 0.446 = 1.069
0.076 / 1.069 = 0.07
0.547 / 1.069 = 0.51
0.446 / 1.069 = 0.42

Application
Instead of Changs if we find the same weight vector by using Abdel-Kader &
Dugdales method (for = 0.5), we have:
w = (0.01, 0.58, 0,41) T

xmin = 0.054

xmax = 0.882

If we normalize:
w = (0.003/0.489, 0.284/0.489, 0.202/0.489) = (0.01, 0.58, 0,41

The Model & the Program Developed

In the model developed there are 91 pairwise comparison

matrices. 59 of which consists of the pairwise comparisons
of the alternatives wrt subcriteria at the lowest level. The
remaining ones are the pairwise comparison matrices of
the criteria in the same group.

A small program is developed to run on M.S. Excel. A table

number is given to each matrix from 1 to 91. The program
developed easily calculates the crisp rankings for each
matrix wrt the chosen method and chosen value of the
optimism index.

APD (Akademik Performans Deerlendirme)

H
A
E

H
A
E
1,00 1,00 1,00 0,11 0,14 0,20 0,13 0,16 0,25
5,00 7,00 9,00 1,00 1,00 1,00 1,00 1,33 2,08
3,98 6,08 7,61 0,48 0,75 1,00 1,00 1,00 1,00

( Tablo - 1 )
Chang
H 0,00
A 0,55
E 0,45

H
A
E
k=

Liou & Wang

0,07 0,07
0,51 0,51
0,42 0,42
0,50 0,75

GS
G
MD
k=

Liou & Wang

0,66 0,65
0,22 0,23
0,11 0,12
0,50 0,75

H
A
E
k=

Abdel-Kader
0,01 0,01
0,58 0,58
0,41 0,41
0,50 0,75

GS
G
MD
k=

Abdel-Kader
0,89 0,89
0,10 0,10
0,01 0,01
0,50 0,75

H : Hizmet
A : Aratrma
E : Eitim

H (Hizmet)
GS
G
MD
GS 1,00 1,00 1,00 1,44 2,27 3,98 4,22 6,26 8,28
G 0,25 0,44 0,69 1,00 1,00 1,00 1,71 1,91 2,08
MD 0,12 0,16 0,24 0,48 0,52 0,58 1,00 1,00 1,00

( Tablo - 2 )
Chang
GS 1,00
G 0,00
MD 0,00

GS : niversitede grev sresi

G : dari grev
MD : Mesleki dernek, vb. almalar

( Tablo - 3 )

Akademisyenlerin niversitedeki grev srelerine gre deerlendirilmesi

A
B
C

A
B
C
1,00 1,00 1,00 0,20 0,33 1,00 0,11 0,11 0,14
1,00 3,00 5,00 1,00 1,00 1,00 3,00 5,00 7,00
7,00 9,00 9,00 0,14 0,20 0,33 1,00 1,00 1,00

A
B
C

Chang
0,00
0,48
0,52

A
B
C
k=

Liou & Wang

0,08 0,08
0,45 0,43
0,47 0,49
0,50 0,75

A
B
C
k=

Abdel-Kader
0,01 0,01
0,45 0,46
0,54 0,53
0,50 0,75

HIG ( H - Hizmet - G - dari grev )

Y
KU

Y
KU
1,00 1,00 1,00 1,29 1,91 2,76
0,36 0,52 0,78 1,00 1,00 1,00

( Tablo - 4 )
Chang
Y 0,84
KU 0,16

Liou & Wang

Y 0,66 0,65
KU 0,34 0,35
k = 0,50 0,75

Abdel-Kader
Y 0,85 0,84
KU 0,15 0,16
k = 0,50 0,75

Chang
A 0,00
B 1,00
C 0,00

A
B
C
k=

Liou & Wang

0,07 0,07
0,74 0,75
0,19 0,18
0,50 0,75

A
B
C
k=

Abdel-Kader
0,01 0,01
0,93 0,92
0,07 0,07
0,50 0,75

A
B
C
k=

Liou & Wang

0,16 0,16
0,71 0,70
0,13 0,14
0,50 0,75

A
B
C
k=

Abdel-Kader
0,03 0,03
0,95 0,95
0,02 0,02
0,50 0,75

A
B
C
k=

Liou & Wang

0,30 0,29
0,11 0,11
0,59 0,59
0,50 0,75

A
B
C
k=

Abdel-Kader
0,21 0,22
0,02 0,03
0,77 0,76
0,50 0,75

( Tablo - 5 )

Akademisyenlerin yneticilik idari grevine gre deerlendirilmesi

A
B
C

A
B
C
1,00 1,00 1,00 0,11 0,11 0,14 0,20 0,33 1,00
7,00 9,00 9,00 1,00 1,00 1,00 5,00 7,00 9,00
1,00 3,00 5,00 0,11 0,14 0,20 1,00 1,00 1,00

( Tablo - 6 )

Akademisyenlerin kurul yelii idari grevine gre deerlendirilmesi

A
B
C

A
B
C
1,00 1,00 1,00 0,20 0,33 1,00 1,00 1,00 1,00
1,00 3,00 5,00 1,00 1,00 1,00 5,00 7,00 9,00
1,00 1,00 1,00 0,11 0,14 0,20 1,00 1,00 1,00

Chang
A 0,00
B 1,00
C 0,00

( Tablo - 7 )

Akademisyenlerin mesleki dernek vb. almalarna gre deerlendirilmesi

A
B
C

A
B
C
1,00 1,00 1,00 1,00 3,00 5,00 0,20 0,33 1,00
0,20 0,33 1,00 1,00 1,00 1,00 0,14 0,20 0,33
1,00 3,00 5,00 3,00 5,00 7,00 1,00 1,00 1,00

Y : Yneticilik
KU : Kurul yelii

Chang
A 0,38
B 0,05
C 0,57

A (Aratrma)
K
ODN
M
B
BBR
DKUH
BTD
PO
APY
YJU
UAEF

1,00
0,11
0,75
0,40
0,36
0,36
0,33
0,75
0,69
0,40
1,00

K
1,00
0,12
1,00
0,52
0,52
0,52
0,47
1,44
0,89
0,48
1,22

( Tablo - 8 )
1,00
0,16
1,33
0,71
0,78
0,78
0,65
2,27
1,12
0,64
1,44

6,26
1,00
7,00
4,72
4,72
1,91
2,76
6,26
3,27
0,84
7,00

ODN
8,28
1,00
9,00
6,80
6,80
4,33
5,13
8,28
3,62
1,19
9,00

9,00
1,00
9,00
8,28
8,28
6,08
6,80
9,00
7,40
1,91
9,00

0,75
0,11
1,00
0,12
0,15
0,12
0,11
0,48
0,48
0,11
3,27

M
1,00
0,11
1,00
0,16
0,21
0,16
0,14
0,64
0,48
0,13
5,74

1,33
0,14
1,00
0,24
0,41
0,24
0,20
0,84
0,52
0,18
7,40

1,41
0,12
4,22
1,00
0,69
2,08
1,00
5,59
4,22
0,36
6,26

K : Kitaplar
ODN : renci ders notlar
M : Makaleleri
B : Bildirileri
BBR : Baslm bilimsel raporlar
DKUH : Dergi kurul yelikleri / hakemlikleri
BTD : Bilimsel toplant dzenleme / kurul yelii
PO : Patentleri / dlleri
APY : Aratrma projesi yrtclkleri
YJU : Yarma jri yelii
UAEF : Uluslaras atf etki faktr

B
1,91
0,15
6,26
1,00
0,89
2,92
1,33
7,61
6,26
0,52
8,28

2,53
0,21
8,28
1,00
1,12
3,66
2,08
9,00
8,28
0,78
9,00

1,29
0,12
2,47
0,89
1,00
1,44
1,00
3,98
1,44
0,15
6,26

BBR
1,91
0,15
4,72
1,12
1,00
1,71
1,33
6,08
2,27
0,21
8,28

2,76
0,21
6,80
1,44
1,00
1,91
2,08
7,61
3,98
0,41
9,00

Chang
K 0,03
ODN 0,00
M 0,27
B 0,00
BBR 0,00
DKUH 0,00
BTD 0,00
PO 0,29
APY 0,05
YJU 0,00
UAEF 0,36

DKUH
1,29 1,91
0,16 0,23
4,22 6,26
0,27 0,34
0,52 0,58
1,00 1,00
0,89 1,12
4,72 6,80
1,29 1,91
0,13 0,18
4,72 6,80

2,76
0,52
8,28
0,48
0,69
1,00
1,44
8,28
2,76
0,28
8,28

1,53
0,15
5,00
0,48
0,48
0,69
1,00
4,72
1,41
0,25
5,59

BTD
2,14
0,19
7,00
0,75
0,75
0,89
1,00
6,80
1,91
0,31
7,61

3,00
0,36
9,00
1,00
1,00
1,12
1,00
8,28
2,53
0,41
9,00

K
ODN
M
B
BBR
DKUH
BTD
PO
APY
YJU
UAEF
k=

Liou & Wang

0,08 0,09
0,01 0,01
0,17 0,17
0,05 0,05
0,06 0,06
0,07 0,07
0,05 0,05
0,18 0,18
0,08 0,08
0,02 0,02
0,22 0,22
0,50 0,75

YDK
K
TK
k=

Liou & Wang

0,65 0,66
0,30 0,29
0,05 0,05
0,50 0,75

Y
E
BY
k=

Liou & Wang

0,76 0,76
0,08 0,09
0,16 0,16
0,50 0,75

0,44
0,11
1,19
0,11
0,13
0,12
0,12
1,00
0,25
0,11
1,44

PO
0,69
0,12
1,57
0,13
0,16
0,15
0,15
1,00
0,31
0,14
2,47

1,33
0,16
2,08
0,18
0,25
0,21
0,21
1,00
0,41
0,20
3,27

K
ODN
M
B
BBR
DKUH
BTD
PO
APY
YJU
UAEF
k=

Abdel-Kader
0,06 0,06
0,00 0,00
0,21 0,21
0,02 0,02
0,03 0,03
0,04 0,04
0,02 0,02
0,23 0,23
0,05 0,05
0,00 0,00
0,35 0,34
0,50 0,75

YDK
K
TK
k=

Abdel-Kader
0,82 0,82
0,18 0,18
0,00 0,00
0,50 0,75

Y
E
BY
k=

Abdel-Kader
0,96 0,95
0,01 0,01
0,04 0,04
0,50 0,75

0,89
0,14
1,91
0,12
0,25
0,36
0,40
2,47
1,00
0,36
3,27

APY
1,12
0,28
2,08
0,16
0,44
0,52
0,52
3,27
1,00
0,52
3,98

1,44
0,31
2,08
0,24
0,69
0,78
0,71
3,98
1,00
0,78
4,33

1,57
0,52
5,59
1,29
2,47
3,56
2,47
5,00
1,29
1,00
5,59

YJU
2,08
0,84
7,61
1,91
4,72
5,59
3,27
7,00
1,91
1,00
7,61

2,53
1,19
9,00
2,76
6,80
7,61
3,98
9,00
2,76
1,00
9,00

A - K (Aratrma - Kitaplar)
YDK
K
TK

YDK
K
TK
1,00 1,00 1,00 5,59 7,61 9,00 6,26 8,28 9,00
0,11 0,13 0,18 1,00 1,00 1,00 4,22 6,26 8,28
0,11 0,12 0,16 0,12 0,16 0,24 1,00 1,00 1,00

Y
E
BY

1,00
0,14
0,31
0,16
0,16
0,21
0,18
0,69
0,31
0,18
1,00

( Tablo - 9 )
Chang
YDK 0,88
K 0,12
TK 0,00

YDK : Yabanc dilde kitaplar

K : Kitap evirileri
TK : Trke kitaplar

A - K - YDK (Aratrma - Yabanc dilde kitaplar )

Y
E
BY
1,00 1,00 1,00 5,59 7,61 9,00 4,72 6,80 8,28
0,11 0,13 0,18 1,00 1,00 1,00 0,36 0,52 0,78
0,12 0,15 0,21 1,29 1,91 2,76 1,00 1,00 1,00

UAEF
0,69 0,82
0,11 0,11
0,14 0,17
0,11 0,12
0,11 0,12
0,12 0,15
0,11 0,13
0,31 0,41
0,23 0,25
0,11 0,13
1,00 1,00

( Tablo - 10 )
Chang
Y 1,00
E 0,00
BY 0,00

Y : Yazalklar
BY : Blm yazarlklar
E : Editrlkleri

A - K - YDK -Y (Aratrma - Yabanc dilde kitap yazarlklar )

KG
YSS

KG
YSS
1,00 1,00 1,00 2,47 3,27 3,98
0,25 0,31 0,41 1,00 1,00 1,00

( Tablo - 11 )
Chang
KG 1,00
YSS 0,00

Liou & Wang

KG 0,76 0,76
YSS 0,24 0,24
k = 0,50 0,75

Abdel-Kader
KG 0,96 0,96
YSS 0,04 0,04
k = 0,50 0,75

KG : Konunun gncelli
YSS* : Yazlan sayfa says

( Tablo - 12 )

Akademisyenlerin yabanc dilde kitap yazarlklarnn konularnn gncelliine gre deerlendirilmesi

A
B
C

A
B
C
1,00 1,00 1,00 1,00 3,00 0,40 1,00 3,00 5,00
2,50 0,33 1,00 1,00 1,00 1,00 1,00 1,00 1,00
0,20 0,33 1,00 1,00 1,00 1,00 1,00 1,00 1,00

A
B
C

Chang
0,78
0,11
0,11

A
B
C
k=

Liou & Wang

0,52 0,50
0,26 0,29
0,22 0,22
0,50 0,75

A
B
C
k=

Abdel-Kader
0,88 0,87
0,06 0,07
0,06 0,07
0,50 0,75

A
B
C
k=

Abdel-Kader
0,88 0,87
0,06 0,07
0,06 0,07
0,50 0,75

( Tablo - 13 )

Akademisyenlerin yabanc dilde kitap yazarlklarnn yazlan sayfa saysna gre deerlendirilmesi
A
B
C

A
B
C
1,00 1,00 1,00 1,00 3,00 0,40 1,00 3,00 5,00
2,50 0,33 1,00 1,00 1,00 1,00 1,00 1,00 1,00
0,20 0,33 1,00 1,00 1,00 1,00 1,00 1,00 1,00

Chang
A 0,78
B 0,11
C 0,11

A
B
C
k=

Liou & Wang

0,52 0,50
0,26 0,29
0,22 0,22
0,50 0,75

A - K - YDK -BY (Aratrma - Yabanc dilde kitap blm yazarlklar )

KG
YSS

KG
YSS
1,00 1,00 1,00 2,47 3,27 3,98
0,25 0,31 0,41 1,00 1,00 1,00

Chang
KG 1,00
YSS 0,00

( Tablo - 14 )
Liou & Wang
KG 0,76 0,76
YSS 0,24 0,24
k = 0,50 0,75

Abdel-Kader
KG 0,96 0,96
YSS 0,04 0,04
k = 0,50 0,75

KG : Konunun gncelli
YSS : Yazlan sayfa says

( Tablo - 15 )

Akademisyenlerin yabanc dilde kitap blm yazarlklarnn konularnn gncelliine gre deerlendirilmesi
A
B
C

A
B
C
1,00 1,00 1,00 1,00 1,00 1,00 5,00 7,00 9,00
1,00 1,00 1,00 1,00 1,00 1,00 5,00 7,00 9,00
0,11 0,14 0,20 0,11 0,14 0,20 1,00 1,00 1,00

Chang
A 0,50
B 0,50
C 0,00

A
B
C
k=

Liou & Wang

0,47 0,47
0,47 0,47
0,07 0,07
0,50 0,75

A
B
C
k=

Abdel-Kader
0,50 0,50
0,50 0,50
0,00 0,01
0,50 0,75

A
B
C
k=

Abdel-Kader
0,72 0,72
0,27 0,27
0,01 0,01
0,50 0,75

( Tablo - 16 )

Akademisyenlerin yabanc dilde kitap blm yazarlklarnn yazlan sayfa saysna gre deerlendirilmesi
A
B
C

A
B
C
1,00 1,00 1,00 1,00 3,00 5,00 5,00 7,00 9,00
0,20 0,33 1,00 1,00 1,00 1,00 3,00 5,00 7,00
0,11 0,14 0,20 0,14 0,20 0,33 1,00 1,00 1,00

Chang
A 0,61
B 0,39
C 0,00

A
B
C
k=

Liou & Wang

0,59 0,58
0,34 0,34
0,07 0,07
0,50 0,75

A - K - YDK - E (Aratrma - Yabanc dilde kitap editrlkleri )

KG
YSS

KG
YSS
1,00 1,00 1,00 6,26 8,28 9,00
0,11 0,12 0,16 1,00 1,00 1,00

( Tablo - 17 )
Chang
KG 1,00
YSS 0,00

Liou & Wang

KG 0,89 0,89
YSS 0,11 0,11
k = 0,50 0,75

Abdel-Kader
KG 1,00 1,00
YSS 0,00 0,00
k = 0,50 0,75

KG : Konunun gncelli
YSS : Yazlan sayfa says

( Tablo - 18 )

Akademisyenlerin yabanc dilde kitaplarda editrlklerinin konularnn gncelliine gre deerlendirilmesi

A
B
C

A
B
C
1,00 1,00 1,00 7,00 9,00 9,00 7,00 9,00 9,00
0,11 0,11 0,14 1,00 1,00 1,00 1,00 1,00 1,00
0,11 0,11 0,14 1,00 1,00 1,00 1,00 1,00 1,00

Chang
A 1,00
B 0,00
C 0,00

A
B
C
k=

Liou & Wang

0,81 0,81
0,10 0,10
0,10 0,10
0,50 0,75

A
B
C
k=

Abdel-Kader
1,00 1,00
0,00 0,00
0,00 0,00
0,50 0,75

( Tablo - 19 )

Akademisyenlerin yabanc dilde kitaplarda editrlklerinin yazlan sayfa saysna gre deerlendirilmesi
A
B
C

A
B
C
1,00 1,00 1,00 7,00 9,00 9,00 7,00 9,00 9,00
0,11 0,11 0,14 1,00 1,00 1,00 1,00 1,00 1,00
0,11 0,11 0,14 1,00 1,00 1,00 1,00 1,00 1,00

A
B
C

Chang
1,00
0,00
0,00

A
B
C
k=

Liou & Wang

0,81 0,81
0,10 0,10
0,10 0,10
0,50 0,75

A
B
C
k=

Abdel-Kader
1,00 1,00
0,00 0,00
0,00 0,00
0,50 0,75

A - K - K (Aratrma - Kitaplar - Kitap evirileri)

KG
SS

KG
SS
1,00 1,00 1,00 0,25 0,31 0,41
2,47 3,27 3,98 1,00 1,00 1,00

( Tablo - 20 )
Chang
KG 0,00
SS 1,00

Liou & Wang

KG 0,24 0,24
SS 0,76 0,76
k = 0,50 0,75

Abdel-Kader
KG 0,04 0,04
SS 0,96 0,96
k = 0,50 0,75

KG : Konunun gncelli
SS : eviri sayfa says

( Tablo - 21 )

Akademisyenlerin kitap evirilerinin konularnn gncelliine gre deerlendirilmesi

A
B
C

A
B
C
1,00 1,00 1,00 1,00 1,00 1,00 0,11 0,11 0,14
1,00 1,00 1,00 1,00 1,00 1,00 0,11 0,11 0,14
7,00 9,00 9,00 7,00 9,00 9,00 1,00 1,00 1,00

A
B
C

Chang
0,00
0,00
1,00

A
B
C
k=

Liou & Wang

0,10 0,10
0,10 0,10
0,81 0,81
0,50 0,75

A
B
C
k=

Liou & Wang

0,10 0,10
0,10 0,10
0,81 0,81
0,50 0,75

A
B
C
k=

Liou & Wang

0,76 0,76
0,14 0,14
0,10 0,10
0,50 0,75

A
B
C
k=

Abdel-Kader
0,00 0,00
0,00 0,00
1,00 1,00
0,50 0,75

A
B
C
k=

Abdel-Kader
0,00 0,00
0,00 0,00
1,00 1,00
0,50 0,75

A
B
C
k=

Abdel-Kader
0,96 0,96
0,03 0,03
0,01 0,01
0,50 0,75

( Tablo - 22 )

Akademisyenlerin kitap evirilerinin evirilen sayfa saysna gre deerlendirilmesi

A
B
C

A
B
C
1,00 1,00 1,00 1,00 1,00 1,00 0,11 0,11 0,14
1,00 1,00 1,00 1,00 1,00 1,00 0,11 0,11 0,14
7,00 9,00 9,00 7,00 9,00 9,00 1,00 1,00 1,00

Chang
A 0,00
B 0,00
C 1,00

A - K - TK (Aratrma - Trke kitaplar )

Y
E
BY

Y
E
BY
1,00 1,00 1,00 5,59 7,61 9,00 4,22 6,26 8,28
0,11 0,13 0,18 1,00 1,00 1,00 1,00 1,53 2,14
0,12 0,16 0,24 0,47 0,65 1,00 1,00 1,00 1,00

( Tablo - 23 )
Chang
A 1,00
B 0,00
C 0,00

Y : Yazalklar
BY : Blm yazarlklar
E : Editrlkleri

A - K - TK -Y (Aratrma - Trke kitap yazarlklar )

KG
YSS

KG
YSS
1,00 1,00 1,00 2,47 3,27 3,98
0,25 0,31 0,41 1,00 1,00 1,00

( Tablo - 24 )
Chang
KG 1,00
YSS 0,00

Liou & Wang

KG 0,76 0,76
YSS 0,24 0,24
k = 0,50 0,75

Abdel-Kader
KG 0,96 0,96
YSS 0,04 0,04
k = 0,50 0,75

KG : Konunun gncelli
YSS : Yazlan sayfa says

( Tablo - 25 )

Akademisyenlerin Trke kitap yazarlklarnn konularnn gncelliine gre deerlendirilmesi

A
B
C

A
B
C
1,00 1,00 1,00 3,00 5,00 7,00 1,00 1,00 1,00
0,14 0,20 0,33 1,00 1,00 1,00 0,14 0,20 0,33
1,00 1,00 1,00 3,00 5,00 7,00 1,00 1,00 1,00

Chang
A 0,50
B 0,00
C 0,50

A
B
C
k=

Liou & Wang

0,45 0,45
0,09 0,09
0,45 0,45
0,50 0,75

A
B
C
k=

Abdel-Kader
0,49 0,49
0,01 0,01
0,49 0,49
0,50 0,75

A
B
C
k=

Abdel-Kader
0,77 0,76
0,21 0,22
0,02 0,03
0,50 0,75

( Tablo - 26 )

Akademisyenlerin Trke kitap yazarlklarnn yazlan sayfa saysna gre deerlendirilmesi

A
B
C

A
B
C
1,00 1,00 1,00 1,00 3,00 5,00 3,00 5,00 7,00
0,20 0,33 1,00 1,00 1,00 1,00 1,00 3,00 5,00
0,14 0,20 0,33 0,20 0,33 1,00 1,00 1,00 1,00

Chang
A 0,57
B 0,38
C 0,05

A
B
C
k=

Liou & Wang

0,59 0,59
0,30 0,29
0,11 0,11
0,50 0,75

A - K - TK -BY (Aratrma - Trke kitap - Blm yazarlklar )

KG
YSS

KG
YSS
1,00 1,00 1,00 2,47 3,27 3,98
0,25 0,31 0,41 1,00 1,00 1,00

( Tablo - 27 )
Chang
KG 1,00
YSS 0,00

Liou & Wang

KG 0,76 0,76
YSS 0,24 0,24
k = 0,50 0,75

Abdel-Kader
KG 0,96 0,96
YSS 0,04 0,04
k = 0,50 0,75

KG : Konunun gncelli
YSS : Yazlan sayfa says

( Tablo - 28 )

Akademisyenlerin Trke kitaplarda blm yazarlklarnn konularnn gncelliine gre deerlendirilmesi

A
B
C

A
B
C
1,00 1,00 1,00 1,00 1,00 1,00 1,00 1,00 1,00
1,00 1,00 1,00 1,00 1,00 1,00 1,00 1,00 1,00
1,00 1,00 1,00 1,00 1,00 1,00 1,00 1,00 1,00

Chang
A 0,33
B 0,33
C 0,33

A
B
C
k=

Liou & Wang

0,33 0,33
0,33 0,33
0,33 0,33
0,50 0,75

A
B
C
k=

Abdel-Kader
0,33 0,33
0,33 0,33
0,33 0,33
0,50 0,75

A
B
C
k=

Abdel-Kader
0,33 0,33
0,33 0,33
0,33 0,33
0,50 0,75

( Tablo - 29 )

Akademisyenlerin Trke kitaplarda blm yazarlklarnn yazlan sayfa saysna gre deerlendirilmesi
A
B
C

A
B
C
1,00 1,00 1,00 1,00 1,00 1,00 1,00 1,00 1,00
1,00 1,00 1,00 1,00 1,00 1,00 1,00 1,00 1,00
1,00 1,00 1,00 1,00 1,00 1,00 1,00 1,00 1,00

Chang
A 0,33
B 0,33
C 0,33

A
B
C
k=

Liou & Wang

0,33 0,33
0,33 0,33
0,33 0,33
0,50 0,75

A - K - TK -E (Aratrma - Trke kitap - Editrlkleri )

KG
YSS

KG
YSS
1,00 1,00 1,00 6,26 8,28 9,00
0,11 0,12 0,16 1,00 1,00 1,00

( Tablo - 30 )
Chang
KG 1,00
YSS 0,00

Liou & Wang

KG 0,89 0,89
YSS 0,11 0,11
k = 0,50 0,75

Abdel-Kader
KG 1,00 1,00
YSS 0,00 0,00
k = 0,50 0,75

( Tablo - 31 )

Akademisyenlerin Trke kitaplarda editrlklerinin konularnn gncelliine gre deerlendirilmesi

A
B
C

A
B
C
1,00 1,00 1,00 1,00 1,00 1,00 0,11 0,11 0,14
1,00 1,00 1,00 1,00 1,00 1,00 0,11 0,11 0,14
7,00 9,00 9,00 7,00 9,00 9,00 1,00 1,00 1,00

Chang
A 0,00
B 0,00
C 1,00

A
B
C
k=

Liou & Wang

0,10 0,10
0,10 0,10
0,81 0,81
0,50 0,75

KG : Konunun gncelli
YSS : Yazlan sayfa says

A
B
C
k=

Abdel-Kader
0,00 0,00
0,00 0,00
1,00 1,00
0,50 0,75

( Tablo - 32 )

Akademisyenlerin Trke kitaplarda editrlklerinin yazlan sayfa saysna gre deerlendirilmesi

A
B
C

1,00 1,00 1,00 1,00 1,00 1,00 0,11 0,11 0,14

1,00 1,00 1,00 1,00 1,00 1,00 0,11 0,11 0,14
7,00 9,00 9,00 7,00 9,00 9,00 1,00 1,00 1,00

Chang
A 0,00
B 0,00
C 1,00

A
B
C
k=

Liou & Wang

0,10 0,10
0,10 0,10
0,81 0,81
0,50 0,75

A
B
C
k=

Liou & Wang

0,42 0,42
0,16 0,16
0,42 0,42
0,50 0,75

A
B
C
k=

Abdel-Kader
0,00 0,00
0,00 0,00
1,00 1,00
0,50 0,75

A
B
C
k=

Abdel-Kader
0,47 0,47
0,06 0,07
0,47 0,47
0,50 0,75

( Tablo - 33 )

Akademisyenlerin alannda basl ders notlarna gre deerlendirilmesi

A
B
C

A
B
C
1,00 1,00 1,00 1,00 3,00 5,00 1,00 1,00 1,00
0,20 0,33 1,00 1,00 1,00 1,00 0,20 0,33 1,00
1,00 1,00 1,00 1,00 3,00 5,00 1,00 1,00 1,00

Chang
A 0,41
B 0,18
C 0,41

A - YJ (Yarma jri yelii)

UA
U

UA
U
1,00 1,00 1,00 2,92 5,28 7,40
0,14 0,19 0,34 1,00 1,00 1,00

( Tablo - 34 )
UA
U

Chang
1,00
0,00

UA
U
k=

Liou & Wang

0,84 0,83
0,16 0,17
0,50 0,75

A
B
C
k=

Liou & Wang

0,69 0,69
0,23 0,22
0,09 0,09
0,50 0,75

A
B
C
k=

Liou & Wang

0,60 0,58
0,20 0,21
0,20 0,21
0,50 0,75

UA
U
k=

Abdel-Kader
0,98 0,98
0,02 0,02
0,50 0,75

A
B
C
k=

Abdel-Kader
0,88 0,87
0,11 0,12
0,01 0,01
0,50 0,75

A
B
C
k=

Abdel-Kader
0,85 0,84
0,07 0,08
0,07 0,08
0,50 0,75

UA : Uluslararas
U : Ulusal

( Tablo - 35 )

Akademisyenlerin uluslaras yarma jrisi yeliklerine gre deerlendirilmesi

A
B
C

A
B
C
1,00 1,00 1,00 3,00 5,00 7,00 5,00 7,00 9,00
0,14 0,20 0,33 1,00 1,00 1,00 1,00 3,00 5,00
0,11 0,14 0,20 0,20 0,33 1,00 1,00 1,00 1,00

Chang
A 0,80
B 0,20
C 0,00

( Tablo - 36 )

Akademisyenlerin ulusal yarma jrisi yeliklerine gre deerlendirilmesi

A
B
C

A
B
C
1,00 1,00 1,00 1,00 3,00 5,00 1,00 3,00 5,00
0,20 0,33 1,00 1,00 1,00 1,00 1,00 1,00 1,00
0,20 0,33 1,00 1,00 1,00 1,00 1,00 1,00 1,00

Chang
A 0,58
B 0,21
C 0,21

A - P (Patentleri / dlleri)
UA
U

UA
U
1,00 1,00 1,00 5,59 7,61 9,00
0,11 0,13 0,18 1,00 1,00 1,00

( Tablo - 37 )
Chang
UA 1,00
U 0,00

Liou & Wang

UA 0,88 0,88
U 0,12 0,12
k = 0,50 0,75

Abdel-Kader
UA 0,99 0,99
U 0,01 0,01
k = 0,50 0,75

Liou & Wang

0,72 0,70
0,14 0,15
0,14 0,15
0,50 0,75

Abdel-Kader
0,96 0,96
0,02 0,02
0,02 0,02
0,50 0,75

( Tablo - 38 )

Akademisyenlerin uluslaras patentlerine / dllerine gre deerlendirilmesi

A
B
C

A
B
C
1,00 1,00 1,00 3,00 5,00 7,00 3,00 5,00 7,00
0,14 0,20 0,33 1,00 1,00 1,00 1,00 1,00 1,00
0,14 0,20 0,33 1,00 1,00 1,00 1,00 1,00 1,00

Chang
A 1,00
B 0,00
C 0,00

UA : Uluslararas
U : Ulusal

A
B
C
k=

A
B
C
k=

( Tablo - 39 )

Akademisyenlerin ulusal patentlerine / dllerine gre deerlendirilmesi

A
B
C

A
B
C
1,00 1,00 1,00 5,00 7,00 9,00 1,00 3,00 5,00
0,11 0,14 0,20 1,00 1,00 1,00 0,14 0,20 0,33
0,20 0,33 1,00 3,00 5,00 7,00 1,00 1,00 1,00

Chang
A 0,61
B 0,00
C 0,39

A
B
C
k=

Liou & Wang

0,59 0,58
0,07 0,07
0,34 0,34
0,50 0,75

A
B
C
k=

Abdel-Kader
0,72 0,72
0,01 0,01
0,27 0,27
0,50 0,75

A - BTDK (Bilimsel toplant dzenleme / kurul yeli)

UA
U

UA
U
1,00 1,00 1,00 4,22 6,26 8,28
0,12 0,16 0,24 1,00 1,00 1,00

( Tablo - 40 )
Chang
UA 1,00
U 0,00

Liou & Wang

UA 0,86 0,86
U 0,14 0,14
k = 0,50 0,75

Abdel-Kader
UA 0,99 0,99
U 0,01 0,01
k = 0,50 0,75

UA : Uluslararas
U : Ulusal

( Tablo - 41 )

Akademisyenlerin uluslaras bilimsel toplant dzenleme / kurul yeliine gre deerlendirilmesi

A
B
C

A
B
C
1,00 1,00 1,00 1,00 1,00 1,00 3,00 5,00 7,00
1,00 1,00 1,00 1,00 1,00 1,00 3,00 5,00 7,00
0,14 0,20 0,33 0,14 0,20 0,33 1,00 1,00 1,00

Chang
A 0,50
B 0,50
C 0,00

A
B
C
k=

Liou & Wang

0,45 0,45
0,45 0,45
0,09 0,09
0,50 0,75

A
B
C
k=

Abdel-Kader
0,49 0,49
0,49 0,49
0,01 0,01
0,50 0,75

A
B
C
k=

Abdel-Kader
0,11 0,12
0,88 0,87
0,01 0,01
0,50 0,75

( Tablo - 42 )

Akademisyenlerin ulusal bilimsel toplant dzenleme / kurul yeliine gre deerlendirilmesi

A
B
C

A
B
C
1,00 1,00 1,00 0,14 0,20 0,33 1,00 3,00 5,00
3,00 5,00 7,00 1,00 1,00 1,00 5,00 7,00 9,00
0,20 0,33 1,00 0,11 0,14 0,20 1,00 1,00 1,00

Chang
A 0,20
B 0,80
C 0,00

A
B
C
k=

Liou & Wang

0,23 0,22
0,69 0,69
0,09 0,09
0,50 0,75

A - DKH ( Aratrma - Dergi kurul yelii / Hakemlii)

UA
U

UA
U
1,00 1,00 1,00 5,59 7,61 9,00
0,11 0,13 0,18 1,00 1,00 1,00

( Tablo - 43 )
Chang
UA 1,00
U 0,00

Liou & Wang

UA 0,88 0,88
U 0,12 0,12
k = 0,50 0,75

Abdel-Kader
UA 0,99 0,99
U 0,01 0,01
k = 0,50 0,75

( Tablo - 44 )

Akademisyenlerin uluslaras dergi kurulu yelikleri / hakemliklerine gre deerlendirilmesi

A
B
C

A
B
C
1,00 1,00 1,00 1,00 3,00 5,00 7,00 9,00 9,00
0,20 0,33 1,00 1,00 1,00 1,00 5,00 7,00 9,00
0,11 0,11 0,14 0,11 0,14 0,20 1,00 1,00 1,00

A
B
C

Chang
0,62
0,38
0,00

A
B
C
k=

Liou & Wang

0,56 0,56
0,38 0,38
0,06 0,06
0,50 0,75

A
B
C
k=

Liou & Wang

0,47 0,47
0,47 0,47
0,07 0,07
0,50 0,75

A
B
C
k=

Abdel-Kader
0,68 0,68
0,31 0,32
0,00 0,00
0,50 0,75

A
B
C
k=

Abdel-Kader
0,50 0,50
0,50 0,50
0,00 0,01
0,50 0,75

( Tablo - 45 )

Akademisyenlerin ulusal dergi kurulu yelikleri / hakemliklerine gre deerlendirilmesi

A
B
C

A
B
C
1,00 1,00 1,00 1,00 1,00 1,00 5,00 7,00 9,00
1,00 1,00 1,00 1,00 1,00 1,00 5,00 7,00 9,00
0,11 0,14 0,20 0,11 0,14 0,20 1,00 1,00 1,00

Chang
A 0,50
B 0,50
C 0,00

UA : Uluslararas
U : Ulusal

A - APY ( Aratrma projesi yrtcl)

UA
U

( Tablo - 46 )

UA
U
1,00 1,00 1,00 5,59 7,61 9,00
0,11 0,13 0,18 1,00 1,00 1,00

Chang
UA 1,00
U 0,00

Liou & Wang

UA 0,88 0,88
U 0,12 0,12
k = 0,50 0,75

Abdel-Kader
UA 0,99 0,99
U 0,01 0,01
k = 0,50 0,75

UA : Uluslararas
U : Ulusal

( Tablo - 47 )

Akademisyenlerin uluslaras kaynakl aratrma projesi yrtclklerine gre deerlendirilmesi

A
B
C

Chang
A 0,52
B 0,48
C 0,00

A
B
C
1,00 1,00 1,00 3,00 5,00 7,00 1,00 3,00 5,00
0,14 0,20 0,33 1,00 1,00 1,00 5,00 7,00 9,00
0,20 0,33 1,00 0,11 0,14 0,20 1,00 1,00 1,00

A
B
C
k=

Liou & Wang

0,49 0,47
0,43 0,44
0,09 0,09
0,50 0,75

A
B
C
k=

Abdel-Kader
0,54 0,54
0,45 0,44
0,01 0,01
0,50 0,75

A
B
C
k=

Abdel-Kader
0,88 0,87
0,01 0,01
0,11 0,12
0,50 0,75

A
B
C
k=

Abdel-Kader
0,88 0,87
0,11 0,12
0,01 0,01
0,50 0,75

( Tablo - 48 )

Akademisyenlerin ulusal kaynakl aratrma projesi yrtclklerine gre deerlendirilmesi

A
B
C

Chang
A 0,80
B 0,00
C 0,20

A
B
C
1,00 1,00 1,00 5,00 7,00 9,00 3,00 5,00 7,00
0,11 0,14 0,20 1,00 1,00 1,00 0,20 0,33 1,00
0,14 0,20 0,33 1,00 3,00 5,00 1,00 1,00 1,00

A
B
C
k=

Liou & Wang

0,69 0,69
0,09 0,09
0,23 0,22
0,50 0,75

A
B
C
k=

Liou & Wang

0,69 0,69
0,23 0,22
0,09 0,09
0,50 0,75

( Tablo - 49 )

Akademisyenlerin baslm bilimsel raporlarna gre deerlendirilmesi

A
B
C

Chang
A 0,80
B 0,20
C 0,00

A
B
C
1,00 1,00 1,00 3,00 5,00 7,00 5,00 7,00 9,00
0,14 0,20 0,33 1,00 1,00 1,00 1,00 3,00 5,00
0,11 0,14 0,20 0,20 0,33 1,00 1,00 1,00 1,00

A - M ( Aratrma - Makaleleri)
UACGD
UACGD 1,00 1,00
UADD 0,15 0,19
UHD 0,11 0,12
UDD 0,11 0,11

1,00
0,36
0,16
0,14

2,76
1,00
0,34
0,12

UADD
5,13
1,00
0,48
0,16

6,80
1,00
1,00
0,24

( Tablo - 50 )
6,26
1,00
1,00
0,12

UHD
8,28
2,08
1,00
0,16

9,00
2,92
1,00
0,24

7,00
4,22
4,22
1,00

UDD
9,00
6,26
6,26
1,00

9,00
8,28
8,28
1,00

Chang
UACGD 0,83
UADD 0,16
UHD 0,01
UDD 0,00

UACGD
UADD
UHD
UDD
k=

Liou & Wang

Abdel-Kader
0,54 0,55 UACGD 0,75 0,74
0,23 0,23
UADD 0,15 0,15
0,19 0,19
UHD 0,10 0,11
0,03 0,04
UDD 0,00 0,00
0,50 0,75
k = 0,50 0,75

UACGD : Uluslaras citation indexe girmi dergi

UADD : Uluslaras dier dergilerde
UHD : Ulusal hakemli dergilerde
UDD : Ulusal dier dergilerde

A - M - UACGD (Aratrma - Makaleleri - Uluslaras Citation indekse girmi dergilerde)

YS
MS
S

YS
MS
S
1,00 1,00 1,00 0,22 0,26 0,31 0,15 0,16 0,18
3,20 3,89 4,65 1,00 1,00 1,00 0,87 1,18 1,91
5,46 6,26 6,63 0,52 0,84 1,15 1,00 1,00 1,00

Chang
YS 0,00
MS 0,36
S 0,64

YS
MS
S
k=

( Tablo - 51 )
Liou & Wang
0,09 0,09
0,40 0,39
0,51 0,51
0,50 0,75

YS
MS
S
k=

Abdel-Kader
0,01 0,01
0,36 0,37
0,63 0,63
0,50 0,75

Akademisyenlerin uluslaras citation indexe giren dergilerdeki makalelerinde yazar saysna gre deerlendirilmesi
A
B
C

A
B
C
1,00 1,00 1,00 1,00 1,00 1,00 1,00 1,00 1,00
1,00 1,00 1,00 1,00 1,00 1,00 1,00 1,00 1,00
1,00 1,00 1,00 1,00 1,00 1,00 1,00 1,00 1,00

Chang
A 0,33
B 0,33
C 0,33

A
B
C
k=

Liou & Wang

0,33 0,33
0,33 0,33
0,33 0,33
0,50 0,75

A
B
C
k=

Abdel-Kader
0,33 0,33
0,33 0,33
0,33 0,33
0,50 0,75

YS: Yazar says

MS : Makale says
S : Sreklilik

( Tablo - 52 )

( Tablo - 53 )

Akademisyenlerin uluslaras citation indexe giren dergilerdeki makale saysna gre deerlendirilmesi
A
B
C

A
B
C
1,00 1,00 1,00 3,00 5,00 7,00 7,00 9,00 9,00
0,14 0,20 0,33 1,00 1,00 1,00 3,00 5,00 7,00
0,11 0,11 0,14 0,14 0,20 0,33 1,00 1,00 1,00

Chang
A 0,83
B 0,17
C 0,00

Liou & Wang

A 0,65 0,66
B 0,29 0,28
C 0,06 0,06
k = 0,50 0,75

Abdel-Kader
A 0,83 0,83
B 0,16 0,17
C 0,00 0,00
k = 0,50 0,75

( Tablo - 54 )

Akademisyenlerin uluslaras citation indexe giren dergilerdeki makalelerinin srekliliine gre deerlendirilmesi
A
B
C

A
B
C
1,00 1,00 1,00 1,00 3,00 5,00 5,00 7,00 9,00
0,20 0,33 1,00 1,00 1,00 1,00 3,00 5,00 7,00
0,11 0,14 0,20 0,14 0,20 0,33 1,00 1,00 1,00

Chang
A 0,61
B 0,39
C 0,00

Liou & Wang

A 0,59 0,58
B 0,34 0,34
C 0,07 0,07
k = 0,50 0,75

Abdel-Kader
A 0,72 0,72
B 0,27 0,27
C 0,01 0,01
k = 0,50 0,75

Chang
YS 0,00
MS 0,36
S 0,64

Liou & Wang

YS 0,09 0,09
MS 0,40 0,39
S 0,51 0,51
k = 0,50 0,75

Abdel-Kader
YS 0,01 0,01
MS 0,36 0,37
S 0,63 0,63
k = 0,50 0,75

A - M - UADD (Aratrma - Makaleleri - Uluslaras dier dergilerde)

YS
MS
S

YS
MS
S
1,00 1,00 1,00 0,22 0,26 0,31 0,15 0,16 0,18
3,20 3,89 4,65 1,00 1,00 1,00 0,87 1,18 1,91
5,46 6,26 6,63 0,52 0,84 1,15 1,00 1,00 1,00

( Tablo - 55 )
YS: Yazar says
MS : Makale says
S : Sreklilik

( Tablo - 56 )

Akademisyenlerin uluslaras dier dergilerdeki makalelerinde yazar saysna gre deerlendirilmesi

A
B
C

A
B
C
1,00 1,00 1,00 1,00 1,00 1,00 0,14 0,20 0,33
1,00 1,00 1,00 1,00 1,00 1,00 0,14 0,20 0,33
3,00 5,00 7,00 3,00 5,00 7,00 1,00 1,00 1,00

Chang
A 0,00
B 0,00
C 1,00

Liou & Wang

A 0,14 0,15
B 0,14 0,15
C 0,72 0,70
k = 0,50 0,75

Abdel-Kader
A 0,02 0,02
B 0,02 0,02
C 0,96 0,96
k = 0,50 0,75

Liou & Wang

A 0,23 0,24
B 0,21 0,22
C 0,57 0,54
k = 0,50 0,75

Abdel-Kader
A 0,05 0,04
B 0,01 0,01
C 0,94 0,95
k = 0,50 0,75

( Tablo - 57 )

Akademisyenlerin uluslaras dier dergilerdeki makale saysna gre deerlendirilmesi

A
B
C

A
B
C
1,00 1,00 1,00 1,00 1,00 0,40 1,00 1,00 1,00
2,50 1,00 1,00 1,00 1,00 1,00 0,14 0,20 0,33
1,00 1,00 1,00 3,00 5,00 7,00 1,00 1,00 1,00

Chang
A 0,00
B 0,00
C 1,00

( Tablo - 58 )

Akademisyenlerin uluslaras dier dergilerdeki makalelerinin srekliliine gre deerlendirilmesi

A
B
C

A
B
C
1,00 1,00 1,00 1,00 1,00 0,40 1,00 1,00 1,00
2,50 1,00 1,00 1,00 1,00 1,00 0,14 0,20 0,33
1,00 1,00 1,00 3,00 5,00 7,00 1,00 1,00 1,00

Chang
A 0,00
B 0,00
C 1,00

Liou & Wang

A 0,23 0,24
B 0,21 0,22
C 0,57 0,54
k = 0,50 0,75

Abdel-Kader
A 0,05 0,04
B 0,01 0,01
C 0,94 0,95
k = 0,50 0,75

Chang
YS 0,00
MS 0,25
S 0,75

Liou & Wang

YS 0,08 0,09
MS 0,32 0,32
S 0,60 0,60
k = 0,50 0,75

Abdel-Kader
YS 0,01 0,01
MS 0,22 0,22
S 0,78 0,77
k = 0,50 0,75

A - M - UHD (Aratrma - Makaleleri - Ulusal hakemli dergilerde)

YS
MS
S

YS
MS
S
1,00 1,00 1,00 0,22 0,26 0,31 0,15 0,16 0,18
3,20 3,89 4,65 1,00 1,00 1,00 0,20 0,33 1,00
5,46 6,26 6,63 1,00 3,00 5,00 1,00 1,00 1,00

( Tablo - 59 )
YS: Yazar says
MS : Makale says
S : Sreklilik

( Tablo - 60 )

Akademisyenlerin ulusal hakemli dergilerdeki makalelerinde yazar saysna gre deerlendirilmesi

A
B
C

A
B
C
1,00 1,00 1,00 3,00 5,00 7,00 3,00 5,00 7,00
0,14 0,20 0,33 1,00 1,00 1,00 1,00 1,00 1,00
0,14 0,20 0,33 1,00 1,00 1,00 1,00 1,00 1,00

Chang
A 1,00
B 0,00
C 0,00

Liou & Wang

A 0,72 0,70
B 0,14 0,15
C 0,14 0,15
k = 0,50 0,75

Abdel-Kader
A 0,96 0,96
B 0,02 0,02
C 0,02 0,02
k = 0,50 0,75

Liou & Wang

A 0,59 0,59
B 0,30 0,29
C 0,11 0,11
k = 0,50 0,75

Abdel-Kader
A 0,77 0,76
B 0,21 0,22
C 0,02 0,03
k = 0,50 0,75

( Tablo - 61 )

Akademisyenlerin ulusal hakemli dergilerdeki makale saysna gre deerlendirilmesi

A
B
C

A
B
C
1,00 1,00 1,00 1,00 3,00 5,00 3,00 5,00 7,00
0,20 0,33 1,00 1,00 1,00 1,00 1,00 3,00 5,00
0,14 0,20 0,33 0,20 0,33 1,00 1,00 1,00 1,00

Chang
A 0,57
B 0,38
C 0,05

( Tablo - 62 )

Akademisyenlerin ulusal hakemli dergilerdeki makalelerinin srekliliine gre deerlendirilmesi

A
B
C

A
B
C
1,00 1,00 1,00 3,00 5,00 7,00 5,00 7,00 9,00
0,14 0,20 0,33 1,00 1,00 1,00 1,00 3,00 5,00
0,11 0,14 0,20 0,20 0,33 1,00 1,00 1,00 1,00

Chang
A 0,80
B 0,20
C 0,00

Liou & Wang

A 0,69 0,69
B 0,23 0,22
C 0,09 0,09
k = 0,50 0,75

Abdel-Kader
A 0,88 0,87
B 0,11 0,12
C 0,01 0,01
k = 0,50 0,75

Chang
YS 0,00
MS 0,36
S 0,64

Liou & Wang

YS 0,09 0,09
MS 0,40 0,39
S 0,51 0,51
k = 0,50 0,75

Abdel-Kader
YS 0,01 0,01
MS 0,36 0,37
S 0,63 0,63
k = 0,50 0,75

A - M - UDD (Aratrma - Makaleleri - Ulusal dier dergilerde)

YS
MS
S

YS
MS
S
1,00 1,00 1,00 0,22 0,26 0,31 0,15 0,16 0,18
3,20 3,89 4,65 1,00 1,00 1,00 0,87 1,18 1,91
5,46 6,26 6,63 0,52 0,84 1,15 1,00 1,00 1,00

( Tablo - 63 )

( Tablo - 64 )

Akademisyenlerin ulusal dier dergilerdeki makalelerinde yazar saysna gre deerlendirilmesi

A
B
C

A
B
C
1,00 1,00 1,00 1,00 1,00 1,00 0,14 0,20 0,33
1,00 1,00 1,00 1,00 1,00 1,00 0,14 0,20 0,33
3,00 5,00 7,00 3,00 5,00 7,00 1,00 1,00 1,00

Chang
A 0,00
B 0,00
C 1,00

Liou & Wang

A 0,14 0,15
B 0,14 0,15
C 0,72 0,70
k = 0,50 0,75

Abdel-Kader
A 0,02 0,02
B 0,02 0,02
C 0,96 0,96
k = 0,50 0,75

Liou & Wang

A 0,14 0,15
B 0,14 0,15
C 0,72 0,70
k = 0,50 0,75

Abdel-Kader
A 0,02 0,02
B 0,02 0,02
C 0,96 0,96
k = 0,50 0,75

( Tablo - 65 )

Akademisyenlerin ulusal dier dergilerdeki makale saysna gre deerlendirilmesi

A
B
C

A
B
C
1,00 1,00 1,00 1,00 1,00 1,00 0,14 0,20 0,33
1,00 1,00 1,00 1,00 1,00 1,00 0,14 0,20 0,33
3,00 5,00 7,00 3,00 5,00 7,00 1,00 1,00 1,00

Chang
A 0,00
B 0,00
C 1,00

( Tablo - 66 )

Akademisyenlerin ulusal dier dergilerdeki makalelerinin srekliliine gre deerlendirilmesi

A
B
C

A
B
C
1,00 1,00 1,00 1,00 1,00 1,00 0,14 0,20 0,33
1,00 1,00 1,00 1,00 1,00 1,00 0,14 0,20 0,33
3,00 5,00 7,00 3,00 5,00 7,00 1,00 1,00 1,00

Chang
A 0,00
B 0,00
C 1,00

YS: Yazar says

MS : Makale says
S : Sreklilik

Liou & Wang

A 0,14 0,15
B 0,14 0,15
C 0,72 0,70
k = 0,50 0,75

Abdel-Kader
A 0,02 0,02
B 0,02 0,02
C 0,96 0,96
k = 0,50 0,75

A - UAEF (Aratrma - Uluslaras atf etki faktr)

KY
B

KY
B
1,00 1,00 1,00 0,11 0,13 0,18
5,59 7,61 9,00 1,00 1,00 1,00

( Tablo - 67 )
Chang
KY 0,00
B 1,00

Liou & Wang

KY 0,12 0,12
B 0,88 0,88
k = 0,50 0,75

Abdel-Kader
KY 0,01 0,01
B 0,99 0,99
k = 0,50 0,75

Liou & Wang

0,59 0,58
0,34 0,34
0,07 0,07
0,50 0,75

A
B
C
k=

Abdel-Kader
0,72 0,72
0,27 0,27
0,01 0,01
0,50 0,75

A
B
C
k=

Abdel-Kader
0,83 0,83
0,16 0,17
0,00 0,00
0,50 0,75

KY : Kendi yaynlarndan
B : Bakalarndan

( Tablo - 68 )

Akademisyenlerin kendi yaynlarndan aldklar atf saysna gre deerlendirilmesi

A
B
C

A
B
C
1,00 1,00 1,00 1,00 3,00 5,00 5,00 7,00 9,00
0,20 0,33 1,00 1,00 1,00 1,00 3,00 5,00 7,00
0,11 0,14 0,20 0,14 0,20 0,33 1,00 1,00 1,00

Chang
A 0,61
B 0,39
C 0,00

A
B
C
k=

( Tablo - 69 )

Akademisyenlerin bakalarnn yaynlarndan aldklar atf saysna gre deerlendirilmesi

A
B
C

A
B
C
1,00 1,00 1,00 3,00 5,00 7,00 7,00 9,00 9,00
0,14 0,20 0,33 1,00 1,00 1,00 3,00 5,00 7,00
0,11 0,11 0,14 0,14 0,20 0,33 1,00 1,00 1,00

Chang
A 0,83
B 0,17
C 0,00

A
B
C
k=

Liou & Wang

0,65 0,66
0,29 0,28
0,06 0,06
0,50 0,75

A - B (Aratrma - Bildirileri)
UAT
UT

UAT
UT
1,00 1,00 1,00 5,00 7,00 9,00
0,11 0,14 0,20 1,00 1,00 1,00

( Tablo - 70 )
Chang
UAT 1,00
UT 0,00

Liou & Wang

UAT 0,88 0,87
UT 0,12 0,13
k = 0,50 0,75

Abdel-Kader
UAT 0,99 0,99
UT 0,01 0,01
k = 0,50 0,75

Chang
TM 1,00
0,00
P 0,00

Liou & Wang

0,78 0,77
0,14 0,14
0,08 0,09
0,50 0,75

Abdel-Kader
0,97 0,97
0,03 0,03
0,01 0,01
0,50 0,75

UAT : Uluslararas toplantlarda

UT : Ulusal toplantlarda

A - B - UAT (Aratrma - Bildirileri - Uluslaras toplantlarda)

TM

TM

P
1,00 1,00 1,00 5,59 7,61 9,00 5,59 7,61 9,00
0,11 0,13 0,18 1,00 1,00 1,00 1,19 1,71 2,33
0,11 0,13 0,18 0,43 0,58 0,84 1,00 1,00 1,00

( Tablo - 71 )
TM

P
k=

TM

P
k=

TM : Tam metin
: zet
P : Poster

A - B - UAT - TM (Aratrma - Bildirileri - Uluslaras toplantlarda - Tam metin)

YS
BS
S

YS
1,00 1,00 1,00 0,22
3,20 3,89 4,65 1,00
5,46 6,26 6,63 0,52

BS
S
0,26 0,31 0,15 0,16 0,18
1,00 1,00 0,87 1,18 1,91
0,84 1,15 1,00 1,00 1,00

YS
BS
S

Chang
0,00
0,36
0,64

( Tablo - 72 )
YS
BS
S
k=

Liou & Wang

0,09 0,09
0,40 0,39
0,51 0,51
0,50 0,75

YS
BS
S
k=

Abdel-Kader
0,01 0,01
0,36 0,37
0,63 0,63
0,50 0,75

Akademisyenlerin uluslararas toplantlarda tam metin olarak sunduklar bildirilerde yazar saysna gre deerlendirilmesi
A
B
C

A
B
C
1,00 1,00 1,00 1,00 1,00 1,00 1,00 1,00 1,00
1,00 1,00 1,00 1,00 1,00 1,00 1,00 1,00 1,00
1,00 1,00 1,00 1,00 1,00 1,00 1,00 1,00 1,00

Chang
A 0,33
B 0,33
C 0,33

A
B
C
k=

Liou & Wang

0,33 0,33
0,33 0,33
0,33 0,33
0,50 0,75

A
B
C
k=

Abdel-Kader
0,33 0,33
0,33 0,33
0,33 0,33
0,50 0,75

YS: Yazar says

BS : Bildiri says
S : Sreklilik

( Tablo - 73 )

( Tablo - 74 )

Akademisyenlerin uluslararas toplantlarda tam metin olarak sunduklar bildiri saysna gre deerlendirilmesi
A
B
C

A
B
C
1,00 1,00 1,00 3,00 5,00 7,00 7,00 9,00 9,00
0,14 0,20 0,33 1,00 1,00 1,00 3,00 5,00 7,00
0,11 0,11 0,14 0,14 0,20 0,33 1,00 1,00 1,00

Chang
A 0,83
B 0,17
C 0,00

Liou & Wang

A 0,65 0,66
B 0,29 0,28
C 0,06 0,06
k = 0,50 0,75

Abdel-Kader
A 0,83 0,83
B 0,16 0,17
C 0,00 0,00
k = 0,50 0,75

( Tablo - 75 )

Akademisyenlerin uluslararas toplantlarda tam metin olarak sunduklar bildirilerin srekliliine gre deerlendirilmesi
A
B
C

A
B
C
1,00 1,00 1,00 3,00 5,00 7,00 5,00 7,00 9,00
0,14 0,20 0,33 1,00 1,00 1,00 1,00 3,00 5,00
0,11 0,14 0,20 0,20 0,33 1,00 1,00 1,00 1,00

Chang
A 0,80
B 0,20
C 0,00

Liou & Wang

A 0,69 0,69
B 0,23 0,22
C 0,09 0,09
k = 0,50 0,75

Abdel-Kader
A 0,88 0,87
B 0,11 0,12
C 0,01 0,01
k = 0,50 0,75

Chang
TM 1,00
0,00
P 0,00

Liou & Wang

TM 0,78 0,77
0,14 0,14
P 0,08 0,09
k = 0,50 0,75

Abdel-Kader
TM 0,97 0,97
0,03 0,03
P 0,01 0,01
k = 0,50 0,75

Liou & Wang

YS 0,09 0,09
BS 0,40 0,39
S 0,51 0,51
k = 0,50 0,75

Abdel-Kader
YS 0,01 0,01
BS 0,36 0,37
S 0,63 0,63
k = 0,50 0,75

A - B - UT (Aratrma - Bildirileri - Ulusal toplantlarda)

TM

TM

P
1,00 1,00 1,00 5,59 7,61 9,00 5,59 7,61 9,00
0,11 0,13 0,18 1,00 1,00 1,00 1,19 1,71 2,33
0,11 0,13 0,18 0,43 0,58 0,84 1,00 1,00 1,00

( Tablo - 76 )
TM : Tam metin
: zet
P : Poster

A - B - UT - TM (Aratrma - Bildirileri - Ulusal toplantlarda - Tam metin)

YS
BS
S

YS
BS
S
1,00 1,00 1,00 0,22 0,26 0,31 0,15 0,16 0,18
3,20 3,89 4,65 1,00 1,00 1,00 0,87 1,18 1,91
5,46 6,26 6,63 0,52 0,84 1,15 1,00 1,00 1,00

Chang
YS 0,00
BS 0,36
S 0,64

( Tablo - 77 )

Akademisyenlerin ulusal toplantlarda tam metin olarak sunduklar bildirilerde yazar saysna gre deerlendirilmesi
A
B
C

A
B
C
1,00 1,00 1,00 1,00 1,00 1,00 1,00 1,00 1,00
1,00 1,00 1,00 1,00 1,00 1,00 1,00 1,00 1,00
1,00 1,00 1,00 1,00 1,00 1,00 1,00 1,00 1,00

Chang
A 0,33
B 0,33
C 0,33

Liou & Wang

A 0,33 0,33
B 0,33 0,33
C 0,33 0,33
k = 0,50 0,75

A
B
C

Chang
A 1,00
B 0,00
C 0,00

Liou & Wang

A 0,68 0,69
B 0,26 0,25
C 0,06 0,06
k = 0,50 0,75

( Tablo - 79 )
Abdel-Kader
A 0,87 0,86
B 0,13 0,14
C 0,00 0,00
k = 0,50 0,75

Akademisyenlerin ulusal toplantlarda tam metin olarak sunduklar bildirilerin srekliliine gre deerlendirilmesi
A
B
C

A
B
C
1,00 1,00 1,00 3,00 5,00 7,00 5,00 7,00 9,00
0,14 0,20 0,33 1,00 1,00 1,00 1,00 3,00 5,00
0,11 0,14 0,20 0,20 0,33 1,00 1,00 1,00 1,00

Chang
A 0,80
B 0,20
C 0,00

Liou & Wang

A 0,69 0,69
B 0,23 0,22
C 0,09 0,09
k = 0,50 0,75

( Tablo - 78 )

Abdel-Kader
A 0,33 0,33
B 0,33 0,33
C 0,33 0,33
k = 0,50 0,75

Akademisyenlerin ulusal toplantlarda tam metin olarak sunduklar bildiri saysna gre deerlendirilmesi
A
B
C
1,00 1,00 1,00 5,00 7,00 9,00 7,00 9,00 9,00
0,11 0,14 0,20 1,00 1,00 1,00 3,00 5,00 7,00
0,11 0,11 0,14 0,14 0,20 0,33 1,00 1,00 1,00

YS : Yazar says
BS : Bildiri says
S : Sreklilik

Abdel-Kader
A 0,88 0,87
B 0,11 0,12
C 0,01 0,01
k = 0,50 0,75

( Tablo - 80 )

( Tablo - 81 )

Akademisyenlerin uluslararas toplantlarda zet olarak sunduklar bildirilere gre deerlendirilmesi

A
B
C

Chang
A 0,33
B 0,33
C 0,33

A
B
C
1,00 1,00 1,00 1,00 1,00 1,00 1,00 1,00 1,00
1,00 1,00 1,00 1,00 1,00 1,00 1,00 1,00 1,00
1,00 1,00 1,00 1,00 1,00 1,00 1,00 1,00 1,00

A
B
C
k=

Liou & Wang

0,33 0,33
0,33 0,33
0,33 0,33
0,50 0,75

A
B
C
k=

Abdel-Kader
0,33 0,33
0,33 0,33
0,33 0,33
0,50 0,75

( Tablo - 82 )

Akademisyenlerin ulusal toplantlarda zet olarak sunduklar bildirilere gre deerlendirilmesi

A
B
C

A
B
C
1,00 1,00 1,00 1,00 1,00 1,00 1,00 1,00 1,00
1,00 1,00 1,00 1,00 1,00 1,00 1,00 1,00 1,00
1,00 1,00 1,00 1,00 1,00 1,00 1,00 1,00 1,00

A
B
C

Chang
0,33
0,33
0,33

A
B
C
k=

Liou & Wang

0,33 0,33
0,33 0,33
0,33 0,33
0,50 0,75

A
B
C
k=

Abdel-Kader
0,33 0,33
0,33 0,33
0,33 0,33
0,50 0,75

A
B
C
k=

Abdel-Kader
0,07 0,08
0,07 0,08
0,85 0,84
0,50 0,75

A
B
C
k=

Abdel-Kader
0,07 0,08
0,07 0,08
0,85 0,84
0,50 0,75

( Tablo - 83 )

Akademisyenlerin uluslararas toplantlarda poster olarak sunduklar bildirilere gre deerlendirilmesi

A
B
C

Chang
A 0,21
B 0,21
C 0,58

A
B
C
1,00 1,00 1,00 1,00 1,00 1,00 0,20 0,33 1,00
1,00 1,00 1,00 1,00 1,00 1,00 0,20 0,33 1,00
1,00 3,00 5,00 1,00 3,00 5,00 1,00 1,00 1,00

A
B
C
k=

Liou & Wang

0,20 0,21
0,20 0,21
0,60 0,58
0,50 0,75

( Tablo - 84 )

Akademisyenlerin ulusal toplantlarda poster olarak sunduklar bildirilere gre deerlendirilmesi

A
B
C

Chang
A 0,21
B 0,21
C 0,58

A
B
C
1,00 1,00 1,00 1,00 1,00 1,00 0,20 0,33 1,00
1,00 1,00 1,00 1,00 1,00 1,00 0,20 0,33 1,00
1,00 3,00 5,00 1,00 3,00 5,00 1,00 1,00 1,00

A
B
C
k=

Liou & Wang

0,20 0,21
0,20 0,21
0,60 0,58
0,50 0,75

E ( Eitim)
YT
S4YVD
DDJ
DS

1,00
0,31
0,13
0,13

( Tablo - 85 )
YT
1,00
0,41
0,18
0,18

1,00
0,69
0,28
0,28

S4YVD
1,44 2,47
1,00 1,00
0,14 0,20
0,16 0,24

3,27
1,00
0,33
0,48

DDJ
3,56 5,59
3,00 5,00
1,00 1,00
0,89 1,12

7,61
7,00
1,00
1,44

3,56
2,08
0,69
1,00

DS
5,59
4,22
0,89
1,00

7,61
6,26
1,12
1,00

Chang
S4YVD 0,56
YT 0,44
DDJ 0,00
DS 0,00

S4YVD
YT
DDJ
DS
k=

Liou & Wang

0,48 0,48
0,36 0,35
0,07 0,08
0,08 0,09
0,50 0,75

S4YVD
YT
DDJ
DS
k=

Abdel-Kader
0,62 0,62
0,35 0,36
0,01 0,01
0,02 0,02
0,50 0,75

( Tablo - 86 )

Akademisyenlerin son 4 ylda verdikleri derslere gre deerlendirilmesi

A
B
C

A
B
C
1,00 1,00 1,00 3,00 5,00 0,40 1,00 1,00 1,00
2,50 0,20 0,33 1,00 1,00 1,00 0,20 0,33 1,00
1,00 1,00 1,00 1,00 3,00 5,00 1,00 1,00 1,00

Chang
A 0,65
B 0,00
C 0,35

YT : Ynettii tezler
S4YVD : Son 4 yarylda verdii dersler
DDJ : Doentlik doktora vs. Jri yelikleri
DS : renci deerlendirmesi sonular

A
B
C
k=

Liou & Wang

0,42 0,44
0,19 0,20
0,40 0,36
0,50 0,75

A
B
C
k=

Abdel-Kader
0,60 0,55
0,02 0,02
0,38 0,42
0,50 0,75

E - YT (Eitim - Ynettii tezler)

DT
YLT

DT
YLT
1,00 1,00 1,00 5,00 7,00 9,00
0,11 0,14 0,20 1,00 1,00 1,00

( Tablo - 87 )
Chang
DT 1,00
YLT 0,00

Liou & Wang

DT 0,88 0,87
YLT 0,12 0,13
k = 0,50 0,75

Abdel-Kader
DT 0,99 0,99
YLT 0,01 0,01
k = 0,50 0,75

A
B
C
k=

Liou & Wang

0,69 0,69
0,23 0,22
0,09 0,09
0,50 0,75

A
B
C
k=

Abdel-Kader
0,88 0,87
0,11 0,12
0,01 0,01
0,50 0,75

A
B
C
k=

Liou & Wang

0,69 0,69
0,23 0,22
0,09 0,09
0,50 0,75

A
B
C
k=

Abdel-Kader
0,88 0,87
0,11 0,12
0,01 0,01
0,50 0,75

A
B
C
k=

Liou & Wang

0,69 0,69
0,23 0,22
0,09 0,09
0,50 0,75

A
B
C
k=

Abdel-Kader
0,88 0,87
0,11 0,12
0,01 0,01
0,50 0,75

A
B
C
k=

Liou & Wang

0,20 0,21
0,20 0,21
0,60 0,58
0,50 0,75

A
B
C
k=

Abdel-Kader
0,07 0,08
0,07 0,08
0,85 0,84
0,50 0,75

( Tablo - 88 )

Akademisyenlerin ynettikleri yksek lisans tezlerine gre deerlendirilmesi

A
B
C

A
B
C
1,00 1,00 1,00 3,00 5,00 7,00 5,00 7,00 9,00
0,14 0,20 0,33 1,00 1,00 1,00 1,00 3,00 5,00
0,11 0,14 0,20 0,20 0,33 1,00 1,00 1,00 1,00

Chang
A 0,80
B 0,20
C 0,00

( Tablo - 89 )

Akademisyenlerin ynettikleri doktora tezlerine gre deerlendirilmesi

A
B
C

A
B
C
1,00 1,00 1,00 3,00 5,00 7,00 5,00 7,00 9,00
0,14 0,20 0,33 1,00 1,00 1,00 1,00 3,00 5,00
0,11 0,14 0,20 0,20 0,33 1,00 1,00 1,00 1,00

Chang
A 0,80
B 0,20
C 0,00

( Tablo - 90 )

Akademisyenlerin doentlik, doktora vs. Juri yeliklerine gre deerlendirilmesi

A
B
C

A
B
C
1,00 1,00 1,00 3,00 5,00 7,00 5,00 7,00 9,00
0,14 0,20 0,33 1,00 1,00 1,00 1,00 3,00 5,00
0,11 0,14 0,20 0,20 0,33 1,00 1,00 1,00 1,00

Chang
A 0,80
B 0,20
C 0,00

( Tablo - 91 )

Akademisyenlerin renci deerdirmesi sonularna gre deerlendirilmesi

A
B
C

A
B
C
1,00 1,00 1,00 1,00 1,00 1,00 0,20 0,33 1,00
1,00 1,00 1,00 1,00 1,00 1,00 0,20 0,33 1,00
1,00 3,00 5,00 1,00 3,00 5,00 1,00 1,00 1,00

Chang
A 0,21
B 0,21
C 0,58

DT : Doktora tezleri
YLT : Yksek Lisans Tezleri

SERVICE

Calculations

Administrative duties Table 92

M
CM
Table 4
0.84
0.16
A
0.00
0.00
0.00
B
1.00
1.00
1.00
C
0.00
0.00
0.00
Table 5 Table 6

Table 2
A
B
C

0.00
0.48
0.52

DOP
1.00
0.00
0.48
0.52
Table

Table 2
A
B
C

0.11
0.48
0.42

DOP
0.66
0.08
0.45
0.47
Table 3

Table 93
AD
PA
0.22
0.11
0.10
0.30
0.73
0.11
0.17
0.59
Table 92 Table 7

Abdel Kader & Dugdale

SERVICE
Administrative duties Table 92
M
CM
Table 4
0.85
0.15
A
0.01
0.01
0.03
B
0.93
0.93
0.95
C
0.06
0.07
0.02
Table 5 Table 6

Table 93
AD
PA
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.38
1.00
0.05
0.00
0.57
3 Table 92 Table 7

Liou & Wang

SERVICE
Administrative dutiesTable 92
M
CM
Table 4
0.66
0.34
A
0.10
0.07
0.16
B
0.73
0.74
0.71
C
0.17
0.19
0.13
Table 5 Table 6

Chang

Table 2
A
B
C

0.01
0.45
0.54

DOP
1.00
0.01
0.45
0.54
Table 3

AD
0.00
0.01
0.93
0.06
Table 92

Table 93
PA
0.00
0.21
0.02
0.77
Table 7

Chang

SERVICE
Administrative duties Table 92
M
CM
Table 4
0.84
0.16
Table 2
A
0.00
0.00
0.00
A
B
1.00
1.00
1.00
B
C
0.00
0.00
0.00
C
Table 5 Table 6

0.00
0.48
0.52

DOP
1.00
0.00
0.48
0.52
Table

Table 93
AD
PA
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.38
1.00
0.05
0.00
0.57
3 Table 92 Table 7

0.00 x 1.00 + 0.00 x 0.00 + 0.38 x 0.00 =

0.00
0.48 x 1.00 + 1.00 x 0.00 + 0.05 x 0.00 =
0.48
0.52 x 1.00 + 0.00 x 0.00 + 0.57 x 0.00 =
0.52

Research - Books - Books in other languages - Author - Chapter author - Editor

Author
( Table - 11 )
A
B
C

0.776
0.112
0.112
(

( Table- 94 )
CS
NOP
1.00
0.00
0.78
0.78
0.11
0.11
0.11
0.11
Table - 12 ) ( Table - 13 )

Editor
( Table - 17 )
A
B
C

Chapter author
( Table - 14 )
A
B
C

0.517
0.483
0.000

( Table - 96 )
CS
NOP
1.00
0.00
1.000
1.00
1.00
0.000
0.00
0.00
0.000
0.00
0.00
( Table - 18 ) ( Table - 19 )

Books in other languages

( Table - 10 )
A
B
C

( Table - 97 )
A
E
CA
1.00
0.00
0.00
0.776
0.78
1.00
0.52
0.112
0.11
0.00
0.48
0.112
0.11
0.00
0.00
( Table - 94 () Table- 96 () Table - 95)

( Table - 95 )
CS
NOP
1.00
0.00
0.50
0.61
0.50
0.39
0.00
0.00
Table - 15 ) ( Table - 16 )

FPE (Faculty Performance Evaluation)

( Table -1 )
A
B
C

( Table - 123 )
S
R
T
0.00
0.55
0.45
0.759
0.00
0.79
0.72
0.126
0.48
0.16
0.09
0.115
0.52
0.05
0.20
( Table - 93)( Table - 120)( Table - 122 )

Chang

FPE (Faculty Performance Evaluation)

Liou Wang

( Table -1 )
A
B
C

( Table - 23 )
S
R
T
0.07
0.51
0.42
0.505
0.11
0.54
0.54
0.241
0.48
0.24
0.20
0.211
0.42
0.14
0.26
( Table - 93)( Table - 120)
( Table - 122 )

FPE (Faculty Performance Evaluation)

( Table -1 )
A
B
C

( Table - 123 )
S
R
T
0.01
0.58
0.41
0.760
0.01
0.79
0.72
0.116
0.45
0.15
0.06
0.123
0.54
0.05
0.22
( Table- 93)( Table - 120)
( Table - 122 )

Abdel Kader

Interpretation of the results &

Sensitivity Analysis
Model is solved with the data foe 3 faculty members, A, B, and C. For
Changs method, Changs method with Liou & Wangs ranking method, and
Changs method with abdel-Kader & Dugdales ranking method the following
performance values are obtained.

Chang
0.759

Liou & Wang

0.505

Abdel-Kader
0.760

0.126

0.241

0.116

0.115

0.211

0.123

A is chosen to be the best one whichever ranking is used

since he has the best values. But B & C s values display
something interesting. We can see that the order might
change when different ranking methods are used.

Interpretation of the results &

Sensitivity Analysis
A sight change in the data can change the whole result. In this
application, B & C were equal according to the evaluation wrt
patents /rewards. By playing with the data a little such that B is
a little better than C wrt that criteria, the overall results will
change as follows:

Chang
0.711

Liou & Wang

0.499

Abdel-Kader
0.744

0.174

0.251

0.133

0.115

0.208

0.123

Conclusion

The ranking method used in Changs method usually chooses

small performance values as zero, which may lead to
unrealistic results. While calculating from the lowest level of
the hierarchy towards the main goal by combining the weight
vectors, having one of the values as zero can eliminate some
effects that might be important.

As the size of the pairwise comparison matrix gets larger, the

number of pairwise comparisons get larger. For example, in
the application presented here, for the main criteria
research we have an 11x11 matrix, for which we need to
make 110 comparisons.

So, using Changs fuzzy AHP approach with other ranking

methods might lead to more realistic results while also
reducing the computation size.

Application: University Selection

Problem
The MADM problem which is solved by Changs extent analysis
combined with five different ranking methods is the university
selection problem. It is assumed that the decision maker is
considering the same department of four private universities.
Three main criteria of the problem are:
Cost of Education (CE)
Quality of Education (QE)
Social Life (SL)

Which University?

Cost of
Education

Quality of Education

Social Life

Tuition

Transportation
cost

University A

Cost of
books, etc.

Reputation of
the university

University B

Curriculum

Faculty
members

Library and
laboratuaries

University C

Social
activities

Sports
facilities

Dorms and
cafeteria

University D

The hierarchy for the University Selection Problem

Table 1
Pairwise comparison of the main criteria

CE
QE
SL
CE 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.17 0.21 0.32 0.35 0.48 0.68
QE 3.08 4.66 5.80 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.39 2.39 3.24
SL 1.46 2.07 2.88 0.31 0.42 0.72 1.00 1.00 1.00
Weights obtained by different ranking methods

CHA A-K
LW CHN CnH YAM
CE 0.000 0.023 0.129 0.089 0.128 0.130
QE 0.774 0.818 0.600 0.631 0.600 0.600
SL 0.226 0.158 0.271 0.280 0.272 0.270

Table 2
Pairwise comparison of the subcriteria of cost of education

TU
TC
CB
TU 1.00 1.00 1.00 2.45 4.78 6.77 3.06 5.30 7.24
TC 0.15 0.21 0.41 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.71 1.16 1.84
CB 0.14 0.19 0.33 0.54 0.86 1.41 1.00 1.00 1.00

Weights obtained by different ranking methods

TU
TC
CB

CHA A-K
LW CHN CnH YAM
0.978 0.932 0.708 0.736 0.706 0.709
0.022 0.041 0.157 0.148 0.159 0.156
0.000 0.028 0.135 0.116 0.135 0.134

Table 3
Pairwise comparison of the subcriteria of quality of education

RU
C
FM
LL

1.00
0.46
0.34
0.41

RU
1.00
0.67
0.44
0.61

1.00
1.08
0.63
0.92

0.93
1.00
0.50
0.38

C
1.49
1.00
0.71
0.56

2.16
1.00
1.29
0.87

1.58
0.78
1.00
0.22

FM
2.27
1.40
1.00
0.32

2.93
2.02
1.00
0.62

1.09
1.15
1.62
1.00

LL
1.63
1.78
3.16
1.00

Weights obtained by different ranking methods

CHA
RU 0.340
C 0.271
FM 0.296
LL 0.093

A-K
0.411
0.242
0.292
0.055

LW
0.332
0.255
0.281
0.133

CHN
0.340
0.260
0.288
0.112

CnH
0.321
0.256
0.280
0.143

YAM
0.334
0.253
0.280
0.132

2.43
2.60
4.62
1.00

Table 4
Pairwise comparison of the subcriteria of social life

SA
SF
DC
SA 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.98 1.43 2.21 0.46 0.62 0.90
SF 0.45 0.70 1.02 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.57 0.76 1.00
DC 1.11 1.61 2.20 1.00 1.31 1.75 1.00 1.00 1.00

Weights obtained by different ranking methods

CHA A-K
LW CHN CnH YAM
SA 0.339 0.306 0.330 0.328 0.330 0.327
SF 0.214 0.167 0.258 0.223 0.267 0.258
DC 0.447 0.527 0.412 0.449 0.403 0.415

Table 5
Pairwise comparison of universities with respect to tuition
A
B
C
D

1.00
1.00
7.00
1.00

A
1.00
1.00
9.00
1.00

1.00
1.00
9.00
1.00

1.00
1.00
7.00
1.00

B
1.00
1.00
9.00
1.00

1.00
1.00
9.00
1.00

0.11
0.11
1.00
0.11

C
0.11
0.11
1.00
0.11

0.14
0.14
1.00
0.14

1.00
1.00
7.00
1.00

D
1.00
1.00
9.00
1.00

Weights obtained by different ranking methods

A
B
C
D

CHA
0.000
0.000
1.000
0.000

A-K
0.002
0.002
0.995
0.002

LW
0.087
0.087
0.739
0.087

CHN
0.015
0.015
0.955
0.015

CnH
0.091
0.091
0.728
0.091

YAM
0.085
0.085
0.745
0.085

1.00
1.00
9.00
1.00

Obtaining the results by using Liou & Wangs ranking method

Cost of Education
TU
( Table - 2 )
A
B
C
D

0.146
0.172
0.572
0.110

0.71
0.09
0.09
0.74
0.09
( Tablo - 5 )

( Table - 15 )
TC
0.16
0.13
0.52
0.12
0.23
( Tablo - 6 )

CB
0.14
0.48
0.22
0.22
0.09
( Tablo - 7 )

Quality of Education
RU
( Table - 3 )
A
B
C
D

0.383
0.240
0.314
0.062

0.33
0.47
0.26
0.23
0.04
( Tablo - 8 )

( Table - 16 )
C
FM
LL
0.25
0.28
0.13
0.22
0.40
0.46
0.22
0.24
0.24
0.48
0.29
0.24
0.09
0.07
0.05
( Tablo - 9 ) ( Tablo - 10 ) ( Tablo - 11 )

Social Life
( Table - 17 )

B
C
D

0.240
0.314
0.062

0.26
0.22
0.24
0.24
0.23
0.48
0.29
0.24
0.04
0.09
0.07
0.05
Obtaining the results by using
Liou &
Wangs ranking
method
( Tablo - 8 ) ( Tablo - 9 ) ( Tablo - 10 ) ( Tablo - 11 )
Social Life
( Table - 17 )
TU
TC
CB
( Table - 4 )
0.33
0.26
0.41
A
0.436
0.47
0.41
0.43
B
0.226
0.26
0.34
0.13
C
0.295
0.23
0.22
0.39
D
0.042
0.04
0.04
0.05
( Tablo - 12 ) ( Tablo - 13 ) ( Tablo - 14)
Main
( Table - 18 )
CE
QE
SL
( Table - 1 )
0.13
0.60
0.27
A
0.367
0.15
0.38
0.44
B
0.228
0.17
0.24
0.23
C
0.342
0.57
0.31
0.30
D
0.063
0.11
0.06
0.04
( Tablo - 15 ) ( Tablo - 16 ) ( Tablo - 17)

Values obtained by different fuzzy ranking methods

Alternatives
University A
University B
University C
University D

Values obtained by different fuzzy ranking methods

CHANG
L&W
A-K&D
CHEN CH&HW
0.422
0.367
0.479
0.350
0.361
0.249
0.228
0.177
0.230
0.239
0.367
0.316
0.342
0.335
0.340
0.014
0.063
0.009
0.041
0.071

YAGER
0.409
0.234
0.297
0.060

Still open questions:

Different ranking method (or defuzzification) used in any

fuzzy MADM application may give different results. So
which method gives the best answer?

What kind of fuzzy membership functions should be

used? Triangular? Trapezoidal? Or some other function?

In this study it is shown that among the six ranking

methods used with Changs method, including the
ranking used by Chang. One method results in a different
ranking. But can we say which one is more realistic?

Conclusions for the study

The ranking method used in Changs method usually chooses small

performance values as zero, which might lead to unrealistic results.
While calculating from the lowest level of the hierarchy towards the
main goal by combining the weight vectors, having one of the values
as zero can eliminate some effects that might be important.

As the size of the pairwise comparison matrix gets larger, the

number of pairwise comparisons get larger. So the amount of
computation required increases.

Using Changs fuzzy AHP approach with other ranking methods may
lead to different results while also reducing the computation size.

So, while applying any fuzzy MADM method, the importance of the
ranking method used should always be considered.