Welcome to Scribd, the world's digital library. Read, publish, and share books and documents. See more
Download
Standard view
Full view
of .
Save to My Library
Look up keyword
Like this
1Activity
0 of .
Results for:
No results containing your search query
P. 1
131016-g. h .Schorel-hlavka o.w.b. to Mr Clive Palmer Constitutional Matters-etc

131016-g. h .Schorel-hlavka o.w.b. to Mr Clive Palmer Constitutional Matters-etc

Ratings: (0)|Views: 217|Likes:
This document includes how to elect a governor-General/President rather then having the governor-General as a lap dog for the government.
This document includes how to elect a governor-General/President rather then having the governor-General as a lap dog for the government.

More info:

Categories:Business/Law
Published by: Gerrit Hendrik Schorel-Hlavka on Oct 16, 2013
Copyright:Attribution Non-commercial

Availability:

Read on Scribd mobile: iPhone, iPad and Android.
download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
See more
See less

10/22/2013

pdf

text

original

 
 p1 16-10-2013
INSPECTOR-RIKATI® about the BLACK HOLE in the CONSTITUTION-DVDA 1
st
edition limited special numbered book on Data DVD
ISBN 978-0-9803712-6-0
PLEASE NOTE
: You may order books in the
INSPECTOR-RIKATI® series
by making a reservation, See also
Blog at
WITHOUT PREJUDICE 
Mr Clive Palmer
16-10-2013Palmer United PartyAdmin@PalmerUnited.com
5
?
Cc: Mr Tony Abbott:Tony.Abbott.MP@aph.gov.au
Ref: 131016-G. H .Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B. to Mr Clive Palmer CONSTITUTIONAL MATTERS-ETC
10
Clive, below I reproduced a email I forwarded to a person named Alan (a person I communicatewith), but saving to type out the same I just quote it.I am concerned about media report that you may seek to block legislation to be passed for noother reason but wanting to have certain political party facilities. If this were true, not that I take
15
it it is, you would be no different then the tugs in some unions who are making unreasonabledemands.First of all the Parliament does not exist out of political parties but out of representatives chosen by the constituents of certain constituencies. As you ought to be aware of sometime a Member of Parliament belongs to a political party when elected and then resigns but still retains the seat in
20
the Parliament. Peter Slipper is one who clearly was no longer a member of a party for which hestood when elected. Likewise Craig Thompson was for the ALP as a elected representative butthen left the ALP.As the Framers of the Constitution stated;
25
Hansard
25-3-1897 
Constitution Convention Debates
(
Official Record of the Debates of the NationalAustralasian Convention
)QUOTE
Mr. WISE:
I can see no other course. It has taken 100 years for the United States to pass a Civil ServiceAct, and now it is not of very much value.
If we get a party system
, and follow it out in the appointment of 30 civil servants, we will be initiating a system of corruption which would gain strength every day.END QUOTE
So true.Reportedly Julia Gillard had a staff of 50, and for what you need to ask?
35
A Prime Minister is supposed to be the first Minister but that is all. We now seem to pretend heis some president or Monarch and we need this nonsense down.Don
t forget you with your companies and so all alter businesses are so to say coughed throughthe eyes to pay for all that non sense.That should stop!
40
The following link not only relates to the document about the Governor-General but also relatesto the position of the politicians defrauding taxpayers (of which your companies also belong) because no one so far seemed to be able to stop them. Surely you don
t want this rot to escalatewith any nonsense?
 
 p2 16-10-2013
INSPECTOR-RIKATI® about the BLACK HOLE in the CONSTITUTION-DVDA 1
st
edition limited special numbered book on Data DVD
ISBN 978-0-9803712-6-0
PLEASE NOTE
: You may order books in the
INSPECTOR-RIKATI® series
by making a reservation, See also
Blog at
Http://www.scrib.com/InspectorRikati.The Parliament can only spend monies within its powers and political parties has nothing to dowith it, other then that if a member of a Political party were to vacate his/her seat then another member of that political party (that is in the Senate) can then replace this person. The
5
constitution was amended to provide for this and no further.Ministers are not appointed because they belong to a specific political party but because first of all the Governor-General acting on behalf of the Monarch cannot be held responsible and hencerelies upon
advisers
who on his/her behalf runs departments as being
responsible Ministers
, but we known now the crap we get that when Peter Garrett presided over the insulation debacle
10
and 4 people died he took no responsibility for this. He as I understand it blames others that theyoverruled him, including Kevin Rudd, but reality is Peter Garrett was the
responsible minister 
and therefore legally accountable!
Hansard
1-3-1898
Constitution Convention Debates
15QUOTE
Sir JOHN DOWNER 
.-
I think we might, on the attempt to found this great Commonwealth, just advance one step, not beyondthe substance of the legislation, but beyond the form of the legislation, of the different colonies, and saythat there shall be embedded in the Constitution the righteous principlethat the Ministers of theCrown and their officials shall be liable for any arbitrary act or wrong they may do, in the same way as
20
any private person would be.
END QUOTE
 No matter what Cabinet or the prime minister decides in the end the
responsible Minister 
hasthe final say. If he has no backbone then too bad, but he remains responsible. that is also why it is
25
utter nonsense for the High Court of Australia to have accepted that creating other positionswithin s64 is permissible because the Framers of the Constitution made it very clear that onlyone person could be in charge of a department and he would be the
responsible Minister 
and assuch no such nonsense as secretary to the Minister or Minister assisting the Minister becauseeach Minister appointed must be part of the federal executive (generally referred to as the
30
cabinet) and clearly this is not now complied with. Just jobs for the boys. Would you reallyaccept that if you had a manager and something went horribly wrong such as the death of aworker he then would blame whomever, like those under his supervision but not accept anyresponsibility himself even so it may be that he as the manager failed to act appropriately or manage appropriately? Yet, this is the culture now created and Peter Garrett is in my view a clear 
35
example and so the Minister for Administration failing to keep an eye on the rorting and ripoff 
s, as is for example with the elderly in nursing homes, where
responsible ministers
are noone to b e found for their lack of proper management resulting in the death of many of theelderly, let alone the huge suffering by the many. What we have is Ministers wanting to be on the job for 
 photo opportunities
to promote themselves, but not willing to accept responsibility for 
40
the job at hand. The Framers of the Constitution made clear that the minister would even beresponsible for the trucks that were operating in his Department as the
responsible Minister 
,well try to find a single Minister willing to do so. In fact Tony Abbott and others are blamingtheir staff for the rorting of expenses, rather then to accept personal liability for fraudulentlycharging expenses. Their staff work on their behalf and if they cannot manage to competently
45
run their own affairs then how can they expect to conduct the affairs for all Australians?Considering that the Commonwealth tired pensions and other welfare payments to the CP{I(Consumer price Index) then why is the Commonwealth not enforcing s109 of the constitutionand ensure the States do not increase their charges above the CPI against the same?Why is it that you as an utter fool have been paying State Land taxes (including council
50
rates)where since 1910 it become a exclusive Commonwealth legislative power, and as suchstate land taxes and council rates (the High Court of Australia in Sydney Council vCommonwealth in 1904 held was a delegated State land tax power)?
 
 p3 16-10-2013
INSPECTOR-RIKATI® about the BLACK HOLE in the CONSTITUTION-DVDA 1
st
edition limited special numbered book on Data DVD
ISBN 978-0-9803712-6-0
PLEASE NOTE
: You may order books in the
INSPECTOR-RIKATI® series
by making a reservation, See also
Blog at
Http://www.scrib.com/InspectorRikatiYou are getting on in age and we all can be struck down by ill health at any time, as I was inrecent weeks, and then you may find that tomorrow you could be in such state of being likevegetable that you be depending upon some care facility. You will find that the
responsible
5
Minister 
will always blame the nursing home providers rather then having so to say a backboneand admit being responsible. This sickening culture should be stamped out.If you ever contemplate to become prime minister then you better so to say pull up your socksand get too work and stop any nonsense.Work from the constitution as to what is the true meaning and application of the constitution and
10
you may just find that electors all over Australia may flock to your party, as they are sick andtired of the abuses by others. Now, how simple can that be just to act according to what is constitutionally permissible and youmay just have so to say granted your wish.
15
The Parliament should never be perverted to provide special facilities for political parties as thisdenies the rights of independents to be equal.If there is to be a leader of the opposition then it should be one democratically elected by allmembers of the opposition and not just because some political party has more seats then another.In any event, the constitution doesn
t provide for any payments for the leader of the opposition
20
or for any so called
shadow ministeries
and so unless there is an amendment of the constitutionto provide for this I hold it is fraudulent conduct to take the cost from the Consolidated RevenueFunds. Would you really like to see that non-union members are forced to follow what unionmembers dictate? Would you really want to give union members working in your companiesspecial privileges not provided to non-union members? So, why should the Parliament be any
25
different? The mere fact that Members of Parliament may have voted for perks doesn
t make itconstitutionally valid and permissible. If workers in your companies were to vote that from nowon they do not want you to be the owner or part owner of the companies would you just goalong? If the voted that they want special perks like a trip around the world at your cost and freechauffeur driven car after the leave their job after say 3 years for retirement would you be foolish
30
enough to accept that? So why then accept former Prime Ministers and former Governor-Generals for those fraudulent payments and perks? Why then not stop this rot?Reality is that generally people are rotten to the core, and this rot is exposed when theythemselves get into a position of power or perceived power. Then all their preaching about whatwas done wrong by others is nothing compared to their own illegal conduct that follows
35
subsequently. What appears to be the motto then is:
I don
t like the bastards to rob me of myhard earned monies I paid in taxes, but if I can rob others even worse then that is allright.
.So, forget about special privileges for any political party, it should be cut out. If they want to runa political party then they can do so outside the Parliament at their own cost. If blue and white
40
colour workers ordinary are limited in what a union can do within a workplace then I view thesame should apply to political parties, which are no more but white colour unions for politicianswhich join them. Would you really want to run your companies along the lines how Parliamentexpenditure is run?Would you want your managers to go for overseas trips supposedly to study, say, how you can
45
file documents into a 4 drawer filing cabinet or how to dispose of an A4 sheet of paper in a waste paper bin, or other such nonsense, and then they bill your company for paying for this and alsofor their extended family to come along, as after all knowing how one dispose of an A4 usedsheet of paper in a waste paper bin is of such considerable difficult consideration that the entirefamily needs to come along. Or would you just tell the joker get lost I have no need for this kind
50
of rubbish?

You're Reading a Free Preview

Download
/*********** DO NOT ALTER ANYTHING BELOW THIS LINE ! ************/ var s_code=s.t();if(s_code)document.write(s_code)//-->