20231209-Mr G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B. To Lawyers Molly Metcalf, Becklegal-Supplement 8-InVITATION

Page 1
1
2
3 Molly Metcalf Lawyer, becklegal (Australia, Victoria date) 9-12-2023
4 mmetcalf@becklegal.com.au
5
6 Cc: Cr Alison Champion alison.champion@banyule.vic.gov.au
7 Cr Fiona Mitsinikos fiona.mitsdinikos@banyule.vic.gov.au
8 Cr Elizabeth Nealy elizabeth.nealy@banyule.vic.gov.au
9 Cr Mark Di Pasquate mark.dipasquale@banyule.vic.gov.au
10 Cr Alida McKern alida.mckern@banyule.vic.gov.au
11 Cr Peter Dimarelos peter.demarelos@banyule.vic.gov.au
12 Cr Rick Garotti rick.garotti@banyule.vic.gov.au
13 Cr Tom Melican tom.melican@banyule.vic.gov.au
14 Cr Peter Casteldo peter.castaldo@banyule.vic.gov.au
15 Mr RomanWojtkowski enquiries@banyule.vic.gov.au
16 Jan Richarson enquiries@banyule.vic.gov.au
17 Officer Janet Redgrave Team Leader Development Planning enquiries@banyule.vic.gov.au
18 Banyule City Council enquiries@banyule.vic.gov.au
19
20 Re: 20231209-Mr G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B. to Molly Metcalf lawyer, becklegal-Supplement 8-
21 INVITATION
22 NOT RESTRICTED FOR PUBLICATION
23 COMPLAINT-Supplement 8
24 Madam,
25 VCAT Mr Preuss in 2010 used government solicitors informing me that if I didn’t
26 remove my publications from the internet I could be charged for CONTEMPT OF COURT. My
27 response was to post even more writings. When then subsequently I appeared before Ms Preuss
28 representing Mr Francis James Colosimo in the appeal against Orders of Administration she then
29 immediately put it to me as to why I should not be charged for CONTEMPT OF COURT, and
30 quoted certain parts of the legislation. I responded with reading out precisely the same legislation
31 and making clear that as she had falsely published on the internet that Mr Francis James
32 Colosimo had been convicted of CONTEMPT OF COURT despite that Her Honour Harbison J
33 already had stated that Her Honour never did convict Mr Francis James Colosimo when I
34 submitted this issue to Her Honour then Ms Preuss had to accept that I (representing Mr Francis
35 James Colosimo) had a legal obligation to correct any false and misleading allegation against Mr
36 Francis James Colosimo and that she (Ms Preuss) was bias to falsely alleged that Mr Francis
37 James Colosimo was convicted of CONTEMPT OF COURT and should disqualify herself of the
38 case. Mr Preuss then made known she was going to consult the President (of VCAT). Later she
39 returned and announced that the appeal against the Order for Administration was upheld and Mr
40 Francis James Colosimo was free to go. I make it very clear that I all along represented Mr
41 Francis James Colosimo FREE OF CHARGE, however this in no way means that I then could
42 deny him any proper representation for fearing any undue threats! My representation in law
43 being equal to the protection a solicitor acting before the Supreme Court of Victoria then I view
44 it means I owe a duty of proper representation and not fear to speak out where I held the party I
45 represented should have proper representation.
46
9-12-2023 Page 1 © Mr G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B.

INSPECTOR-RIKATI® about the BLACK HOLE in the CONSTITUTION-DVD
A 1st edition limited special numbered book on Data DVD ISBN 978-0-9803712-6-0
PLEASE NOTE: You may order books in the INSPECTOR-RIKATI® series by making a reservation, or E-mail
admin@inspector-rikati.com See also www.scribd.com/inspectorrikati
Page 2
1 Likewise, I recognise that I should invite you to respond why I should not file a complaint
2 against lawyer Molly Metcalf and so becklegal for numerous issues, as I will set out some below.
3 But first:
4 Most if not all telecommunication companies actually have stipulated for those who seek to use
5 their services to accept the terms and conditions. When I checked iiNET I discovered that it
6 referred to details being release to law enforcement authorities, etc, because of certain legislative
7 requirements. However, the legislative provisions it referred to simply didn’t exist. Meaning that
8 those who accept those terms and conditions, including lawyers, basically gave away their client-
9 lawyer confidentiality based upon non-existing legislative provisions iiNET referred to. When I
10 made a complaint to iiNET about this the response was they had not yet updated their website.
11 Well, listing non-existing purported legislative provisions had nothing to do with not updating as
12 it never should have been there in the first place. I decided not to use iiNET. What is clear is that
13 lawyers claiming confidential communication may actually not have that at all.
14 Australia is part of a Five Eyes intelligence pack between the USA, Canada, Australia, New
15 Zealand and the UK which deals with a lot of confidential issues. Now it even pursues biometric
16 information all allegedly for security issues this even so this very information is passed on to
17 Ukraine, WHO, W.E.F. U.N. Israel, etc. In fact it is a former Israelis secret agent who set up a
18 system to provide PRO BONO security, and many hospitals, infrastructure such as water, gas,
19 electricity, etc all allowed unvetted access to highly critical security issues. Previously Scott
20 Morrison and now Anthony Albanese, and other Prime Ministers, and their collaborators, are
21 pushing the Digital Identity under any excuse even so this means that confidential information
22 will be made available to countries like the NAZI Ukraine. Meaning, it has nothing to do with
23 national security but rather to undermine national security. It would allow any politicians, judge,
24 lawyer, etc to be blackmailed or even be banned from internet, or whatever.
25 I exposed how Nicola Gobbo was representing Carl Williams and he then wrote that in his
26 view Nicola Gobbo was a police informer. Well, she was an OFFICER OF THE COURT
27 undermining the very administration of justice and what really was her punishment to bring the
28 administration of justice in disrepute? And, the same with the Victorian Police, the ATO, etc.
29
30 I have absolutely no doubt that because of these and plenty of other issues, such as the elaborate
31 covid scam harming many but also mass murdering Australians I was targeted for political
32 persecution, and this is in my view the driver behind the conduct of Banyule City Council. Just
33 that targeting Olga my 91-year-old wife, who suffers from heart failure and other comorbidities
34 and as result of the stress caused by Banyule City Council staff by this ended up in having to use
35 a wheelchair, etc. this went by far overboard.
36 In my view you and so becklegal went overboard to seek to defend your client Banyule City
37 Council with lies and deception and failing to act honourable in the circumstances. This I view
38 requires to be investigated how often this kind of legal trickery has been used in other cases also.
39
40
Page 3
1
2 Your 25 October 2023 correspondence to me referred to various aerial images which targeted
3 our 107 Graham Road Viewbank property, and dated 2018, 209, 2020, 2021, 2022 and 2023.
4 And it appeared to me you sought to use this as a justification of the 6 and September 2023
5 invasion of our private property despite of the signs as shown above:
6 The following of my COMPLAINT must be properly understood also:
7
8 It is very important that citizens do not cave into the terrorism of any council. Hold
9 them legally accountable. Perhaps this document may provide an insight how to do
10 so.
11 You can download the document from:
12 https://www.scribd.com/document/682156215/20231104-Mr-G-H-Schorel-Hlavka-O-W-
13 B-to-Lawyers-Molly-Metcalf-Becklegal-Supplement-2
14 Some of it I quote:
15 QUOTE
16
17
18 From this it must be clear about the legal principle that even without a NOTICE a locked gate
19 itself is sufficient regarding a residential property.
20
21 The following albeit from USA legislation also indicated that trespassing also can relate to a
22 vehicle:
23
24
25
Page 4
1 Again:
2
3
4
5 As the person already twice trespassed upon the land (6 & 7 September 2023) despite it being
6 blocked off by tress and gates and with NOTICES (SIGNS) and then following this trespassing
7 further upon the motor vehicle 1XK6MV
8 END QUOTE
9 And in Kentucky v King 563US
10 QUOTE
11
12 END QUOTE
13
14 It is therefore very clear that being it police, Banyule City Council officer, etc, when faced with a
15 locked fence (as our was) even without any signs could not be entered without a WARRANT.
16
17 Yet, we even had signs throughout the property that ENTRY PROHIBITED and even citing
18 many Authorities.
19
20 One of your issues was the aerial images.
21
22 The truth is that the aerial images are vague and aloof as you really would have a problem to
23 even try to recognise items other than perhaps the residence, garage and motor vehicles.
24
25 The Tue 20 September 2022 aerial image cannot be relied upon because by the time of the 6 and
26 7 September 2023 trespassing nearly a full year had passed and anything then could have
27 happened, without that I concede that your client had any right to be STALKING us, etc. So the
28 next aerial image you had was Sat 16 September 2023 which may now clearly show certain
29 items but my son Mark and I can produce (if needed to a court) various receipts from Bunnings
30 and other stores having purchased mid 2023 items that I can recognise as being shown. Since
31 when is it a crime to have recently lawfully purchased items on our property, and where is the
32 legality of your demand that we had to remove them?
33
34 Oh I get it, you relied upon certain planning legal provisions, despite of the following Authority?
35
36 https://constitutionwatch.com.au/fee-simple/ttps://constitutionwatch.com.au/fee-simple/
37 Commonwealth v New South Wales [1923] HCA 34 (1923) 33 CLR 1 (9 August 1923)
38 HIGH COURT OF AUSTRALIA
39 KNOX C.J., ISAACS, HIGGINS, GAVAN DUFFY AND STARKE JJ.
40 THE COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA PLAINTIFF against
41 THE STATE OF NEW SOUTH WALES AND ANOTHER DEFENDANTS

Page 5
1 1920-1923: SYDNEY, Dec. 1-3, 1920; Mar. 21-29, 1922; Aug. 9, 1923 33 CLR 1
2 Extracts from Commonwealth Law Reports Volume 33 / 33 CLR 1:- (1920) 33 CLR 1 at 42
3 QUOTE
4 “It confers, and since the beginning of legal history it always has conferred, the lawful
5 right to exercise over, upon, and in respect to, the land, every act of ownership which
6 can enter into the imagination, including the right to commit unlimited waste; and,
7 for all practical purposes of ownership, it differs from the absolute dominion of a
8 chattel, in nothing except the physical indestructibility of its subject.”
9 “Besides these rights of ownership, a fee simple at the present day confers an absolute
10 right, both of alienation inter vivos and of devise by will.”
11 END QUOTE
12 And
13 QUOTE
14 ISAACS J. In Challis's Real Property, 3rd ed., p. 218,
15 it is stated with perfect accuracy:—
16 “In the language of the English law, the word fee signifies an estate of inheritance as
17 distinguished from a less estate; not, as in the language of the feudists, a subject of tenure
18 as distinguished from an allodium.”
19 “Allodium being wholly unknown to English law, the latter distinction would in fact have
20 no meaning.” “A fee simple is the most extensive in quantum, and the most absolute in
21 respect to the rights which it confers, of all estates known to the law.”
22 END QUOTE
23
24 The Planning & Environment Act 1987 it refers to “Order prohibiting the use or development
25 of land under this Act and the Building Act 1993 for period of time”, but that was obviously
26 left off the NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF ENTRY, this I view as to deceive what the
27 legislation really was about and not at all applicable to our property, as no court had found us
28 “guilty” and neither was any Order issued by the Governor-in-Council.
29 .
30
31
32 Besides that the purported notice really was no more by a NOTIFICATION for a NOTICE OF
33 ENTRY for 1 December 2023 which was actually not followed up with a NOTICE OF ENTRY
34 at all, and purportedly served by TRESPASSING on 29 November 2023 not even leaving the 2
35 clear days required.
36 Then a similar also dated 29 November 2023 NOTIFICATION for a NOTICE OF ENTRY for
37 8 December 2023 was posted to us but neither followed up with an actual NOTICE OF ENTRY.
Page 6
1 However, the 29 November 2023 trespassing was as such that it scared the living daylights out of
2 my wife that someone was bashing on the door trying to break in and as result her heart rate went
3 from 72 to 212.
4
5 My wife’s heart rate went from 72 to 121 finding Banyule City Council bashing at the
6 door in violation of ENTRY PROHIBITED signage, resulting my wife now in bed
7 trying to recover from the shock. Let the rule of law prevail!
8 You can download the document from:
9 https://www.scribd.com/document/688175535/20231129-Mr-G-H-Schorel-Hlavka-O-W-
10 B-to-Lawyers-Molly-Metcalf-Becklegal-Supplement-3
11
12 It should be obvious that the 20 September 2022 aerial image couldn’t be relied upon because it
13 was part of unlawful STALKING, and the 16 September 2023 Aerial image neither could be
14 used because of STALKING, but it also was 10 days after the initial trespass and so your client
15 could not have any alleged knowledge what a later aerial image may contain.
16 Also, besides the trespassing on the land your client also TRESSPASSED upon Olga’s motor
17 vehicle Ford AU, and clearly as the vehicle was lawfully parked in front of our property and no
18 parking limitations were on any signs, in fact there were no signs at all, then there hardly could
19 be any excuse for the vandalism by your client upon this Ford AU.
20
21 You also referred to Fire Rescue Victoria having made a report and authorising your client, just
22 that when I requested copies of documentation, etc, none was provided. As a matter of fact more
23 than 3 months later Fire Rescue Victoria didn’t bother to contact us about the alleged report. Let
24 alone about other issues you alleged Fire Rescue Victoria referred to.
25
26 Despite that I made known about the effect of your client bashing the door to which they had no
27 right and was by TRESPASSING your client nevertheless persisted with posting then the
28 purported 29 November 2023 NOTIFICATION for a NOTICE OF ENTRY for 8 December
29 2023. This caused further stress upon my wife that her heart rate went from about 80 to 121
30 fearing that they might this time succeed in breaking into the residence.
31 Yet, your client did not apparently appear on 1 December 2023 and neither on 8 December 2023,
32 and as such having in particularly caused uncalled stress upon us, and in particular upon Olga,
33 had not even the common decency to advice that the threatened 1 December 2023 attendance and
34 the threatened 8 December 2023 attendance would not be proceeded with.
35
36 And my neighbour gave me the understanding having been unaware that Banyule City Council
37 staff on 4 occasions entered their property (TRESPPASSING) as to climb over the fence to
38 TRESPASS upon our property.
39
40 Also, your client’s staff on 4 occasions entered a gazebo to which they neither had any legal
41 right to do so. As well as causing damages on various occasions to our property, including a
42 disability mobile Scooter.
43
44 As you correspondence referred to 1 December 2023 and 31 December 2023, regardless that you
45 had no such legal powers to make the demands you made, then your client simply violated those
46 dated by its conduct. Yet, your silence is deafening! No clarifications as to your client violating
47 your own dates and neither the ongoing trespassing, harassment, and harm inflicted.
48
49 I am well aware that one can have unruly clients. Ok, I did not refer to those I represented as
50 ‘clients’ because I didn’t charge them not even for my out of pocket expenses, but when one
51 represented an unruly client/party which act in an unlawful manner then as an OFFICER OF
Page 7
1 THE COURT you have a legal obligation to report this, as otherwise you become an associate
2 of the crimes being committed on your watch.
3
4 You could and I view should have made clear that you cannot allow your client to violate the
5 dates you provided for, regardless if the demands you made may in the end not be valid. As I
6 provided you with updated information you had a choice making clear to your client to cut out
7 this trespassing, STALKING and the uncalled harm to us, in particular Olga or you would simple
8 terminate to represent them. In my view you failed to do so, at least you didn’t advise us you no
9 longer represented Banyule City Council. As such in my view you, so becklegal, continue to
10 represent Banyule City Council and knowingly have gone along about the criminal conduct your
11 client was engaged in and the harm inflicted upon us, and particularly upon Olga.
12
13 As I did set out to you the Section 32 of the Fire Rescue Victoria legislation did not as such
14 apply to us and yet you failed to clarify this. Indeed what really was the evidence for Fire Rescue
15 Victoria to allegedly even attend when there was no fire at all?
16
17 And the nonsense that we somehow operate a ‘store’ is I view criminal to try to justify the harm
18 in particularly inflicted upon Olga. It seems to be that the perception of a ‘store’ is as much as
19 your perception of the Tooth Fairy, so have some illusion about what doesn’t exist and it appears
20 to me you seek to justify criminal conduct of your client.
21
22 I did write to the Victoria Police and well could reasonably expect they would never get involve.
23 I will quote part of my most recent correspondence to the Victorian Police:
24 QUOTE 20231207-Mr G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B. to Victoria Police at Heidelberg - COMPLAINT-
25 Supplement 4
26 Victoria Police at Heidelberg (Australia, Victoria date) 7-12-2023
27 HEIDELBERG.UNI@police.vic.gov.au
28
29 20231207-Mr G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B. to Victoria Police at Heidelberg - COMPLAINT-Supplement 4
30
31 Sir/Madam,
32 on 29 November 2023 I reported trespassing, etc, and requested the police to assist
33 with an intervention/restraining order against Banyule City council but the silenced is deafening.
34 It may just expose the gross incompetence that has been going on for the last few years.
35 When a citizen is aware that a crime is going to be committed, a crime is already ongoing or a
36 crime was committed then the citizen has a legal duty to report it to the relevant law enforcement
37 agencies and if possible, where appropriate in the circumstances, seek to intervene or assist law
38 enforcement agencies.
39 The police has such legal obligations as ultimately they are citizens even if they may hold that
40 their police functions are not applicable as such. Then again you can find cowards everywhere
41 and this may also be why police may not wish to get involved rightly or wrongly being scared
42 about how it all will end, perhaps being grossly incompetent to understand and comprehend legal
43 issues, even so when it comes to harassing ordinary citizens they will generally pretend they
44 know the law.
45 When I had to manage factories the first thing machine setters were to do was to set me up
46 knowing I never had operated such machinery and well what better than a newby to make a fool
47 off. Just, that in the end it were the so called experienced machine setters who were the fools. I
48 may not had had the experiences of how to operate machinery but I used “common sense” and
49 took up the challenge put to me as I had read the machine manuals and held that actually I was
50 right and the setters , some working for 25+ years were wrong. In the end they admitted that I
51 was proven to be right. This is the problem that often experienced personnel may have error and
52 pass them on to others who then make the same errors and on and on and then a stranger simply
53 notice the errors being made. The same appears to me with the Victorian Police force where
Page 8
1 police are trained but may lack any real skills how to properly assess matters and conduct
2 themselves.
3 Who can forget about the sheer terrorism by the Victorian Police force upon parents holding
4 their small children in their arms while the Victoria Police at the Shrine of Remembrance notably
5 were firing rubber bullets upon them merely because the Victorian Police were willing to violate
6 the peaceful protesters their constitutional rights because some Chief Health Officer who I
7 understand had no medical degree somehow was unconstitutionally enforcing mandates to which
8 the State of Victoria had no legislative, executives and administrative powers.
9 Who can forget the “hero’s” in the medical profession reportedly murdering Australians and well
10 the Victoria Police didn’t bother to stop this mass murder!
11 Who can forget the “hero’s” of the Victorian police stumping on the head of a disable man,
12 throwing down a aged woman and spray her and then simply walk off for a job well done,
13 grabbing a young women by the neck and sitting on her for not wearing a mask, this even so she
14 had a medical exemption, arresting a pregnant woman at her home, etc. This to me were the
15 cowards of the Victoria Police force walking about with shield, etc, terrorising law abiding
16 citizens because after all they were specifically trained for this.
17 Well Brad Hazzard then Minister for health NSW and the NSW Chief Health Officer assisting
18 him both made clear this was for the New World Order. So the police around Australia were in
19 my view traitors to align themselves with those betraying their oaths to the Commonwealth of
20 Australia Constitution Act 1900 (UK), etc.
21
22 I wrote numerous correspondences as early as 8 April 2020 to the then Victorian Ombudsman
23 and on 13 April to the Victorian Human Rights Commission well aware that more than likely
24 they were siding with the enemy.
25
26 I wasn’t however deterred as I knew that soon or later the home grown traitors would start
27 targeting me as they were unable to stop my publications. Oh boy, was I right. Just that by
28 targeting Olga my 91-year-old wife they made a huge mistake. And well the Victorian Police
29 instead of doing their job to warn Banyule City Council against trespassing, etc, it did absolutely
30 nothing.
31
32 In my writings I did make clear that any person who acts in violation of the constitution by this is
33 automatically stripped of any protection of office and simply reverts to being no more but a
34 citizen only, as any office holding is no more.
35
36 But, the failure of proper training may also have resulted that the Victoria Police, as like many
37 other police forces in Australia simply have the misconception that those working for Banyule
38 City Council or any other council cannot be held legally accountable as after all legislation
39 provides for Planning & Environment Act 1987 “S. 138 amended by No. 37/2014 s. 10(Sch. item
40 124.3). 138 No legal proceedings against authorised persons”. Hence the Courts generally
41 leave the traitors/lawbreakers off and not apply any form of legal accountability.
42 What is the use if you file a complaint and have to deal with those purportedly going to
43 investigate but do not even know and understand what is legally correct? What is the use to have
44 a police force that is grossly incompetent not knowing what the constitutional rights of citizens
45 are.
46
47 As I did set out (see below) to Banyule City Council lawyer M Metcalf of becklegal that any
48 legislation anywhere in Australia that purports to provide that some Minister and his officials
49 cannot be sued is unconstitutional.
50

Page 9
1 "All laws which are repugnant to the Constitution are null and void." Marbury vs.
2 Madison 1803, 5 U.S. (2 Cranch) 137, 174, 176.
3
4 “A pretend law made in excess of power is not and never has been a law at all. Anybody in the
5 country is entitled to disregard it”. Chief Justice Latham 1942
6
7 Here we had alleged hero police officers terrorising citizens but well they had the power to do so
8 and who cares about constitutional, legal, human, natural and common law rights when you can
9 betray your country to be a collaborator with foreign enemy powers.
10
11 Just, that I happen to have started my hobby to research the constitution many decades ago and
12 in 2001 decided to take on the AEC etc. After all I held that the “compulsory” of voting was
13 unconstitutional, that State land taxation was unconstitutional and so the “council rates”. Well
14 the AEC charged me for FAILING TO VOTE in the 2001 federal election and again the same in
15 the 2004 federal election. I filed and served upon all 9 Attorney-Generals a NOTICE OF
16 CONSTITUTIONAL MATTER and all along representing myself defeated both charges on 19
17 July 2006.
18
19 At times I do vote, when I view there is a worthy candidate to vote for and at time I don’t and the
20 AEC or for that any Election Commission never again can charge me.
21 Obviously the constitution was not created just for my sake and so if the “compulsory” part of
22 voting is unconstitutional then why are judges nevertheless go along to convict other electors?
23 Also, if “citizenship” is not a nationality as despite the High Court of Australia claiming
24 Australians are not “subject of the British Crown” in Sue v Hill reality is that it had no judicial
25 powers to amend the constitution by backdoor manner.
26
27 It means that all those who claim to have “Australian Citizenship” as a nationality to have been
28 appointed in a special position, such as lawyers (as OFFICER OF THE COURT), police,
29 Members of Parliament, judges, etc, all mare actually never validly appointed. Not long after I
30 wrote that the then Premier of Victoria Daniel Andrews was never entitled to be Premier due to
31 what I held criminal conduct he quit, albeit the Victoria Police never bothered to charge him as I
32 view they should have such as the involvement of hit and run, false and misleading statement,
33 being hit on the shoulder by timber floor, etc.
34
35 When did the Victoria Police or for that any police force in Australia investigate the “covid
36 scam” that resulted in numerous people not just become disable but even having died?
37
38 Yes, those cowards of the police forces rather became collaborators to the mass murder, etc, then
39 to hold the evil doers legally accountable. A few police officers stood their ground and simply
40 left the police force rather than betray their oath and side with the traitors/terrorist.
41
42 And well my about 7,000 pages 6 August 2021 complaint & Supplements to the Australian
43 Federal Police with extensive back up material was left as was as after all siding with the home
44 grown enemy is better for future job prospects.
45
46 Yes, those “hero’s” police officers rather betray their own family and others then to follow
47 through on their oaths.
48
49 A (medical) specialist in 2021 was telling Olga and myself how proud he was that his parents
50 had accepted the burden to migrate to Australia just to be able to give their son a better future.
51 Well, he then announced very proudly that as soon as it was approved he would have his 2 sons

Page 10
1 vaccinated (that is with the “gene therapy” DEPOPULATION bioweapon jab), as such
2 vandalising the future of his son pretending it was better for them.
3
4 Little wonder that the cowards in the police force refuse to do anything to protect Olga (my wife)
5 against the terrorism by Banyule City Council let alone enforce the rule of law as after all this
6 political persecution is more important to them as it serves the NEW WORLD ORDER!
7 They are perhaps hoping that the U.N. soldiers will come around to murder more Australians
8 with injections as after all they will be protected from any legal accountability courtesy of the
9 Federal Government, well so they think. Just that the legal principle embedded in the
10 constitution prevent any lawful authorisation for U.N. troops to go around killing people and
11 more over they cannot be protected against legal accountability!
12
13 Hansard 10-3-1891 Constitution Convention Debates (Official Record of the Debates of the National
14 Australasian Convention)
15 QUOTE Mr. DIBBS:
16 The question of creating a standing army is one which, to my mind, is almost more
17 repulsive than the question of readjustment of territorial boundaries. It means the
18 existence in our midst of a certain number of idle men-men sharpening their knives
19 and their swords for the first fitting opportunity of fleshing them on the people of
20 their own country, because we have no other enemies. We, in Australia-federated
21 Australia, I may take it, because the matter is one which applies to the whole-have no
22 enemies within our borders; we have no Indians to dispute with us the possession of the
23 soil; we have no powerful Maori race, to fight, as was once the case in New Zealand, for
24 the territory the right to which belonged to the Maoris themselves. We have no enemies
25 within, and the only thing we have to fear is the possibility of any assault on the mother
26 country by her enemies from without, unless indeed the creation of a standing army proves
27 a menace to the people of Australia by the existence of an armed force for unlawful
28 purposes. This question of the creation of a military force is one of the blots upon these
29 resolutions. We want no military force within New South Wales. All we want to do is to
30 make every man who is either a native of the soil, or one of ourselves by reason of his
31 taking up his residence amongst us, prepare to resist possible invasion from without.
32 Who are our enemies? Who are our enemies but the enemies of England, and they, so long
33 as we remain under the Crown, will be dealt with by an outer barrier, an outer bulwark in
34 the defence of Australia, in the shape of the navy of Old England. But we have no enemies
35 within, and there is no necessity to fasten the curse of a standing army upon us. As was
36 pointed out by the hon. member, Sir George Grey, yesterday, in his interesting speech, we
37 have no necessity to keep a large standing army at a large cost to the people of the country,
38 [start page 185] when we have no enemies with whom they will have to fight. Our own
39 police are quite sufficient for the preservation of order within.
40 END QUOTE
41
42 Well, it seems the Framers of the Constitution expected the police to be honourable police
43 officers and now cowards, traitors, terrorist, etc.
44
45 Remember how the term “indigenous Aboriginals” has been used time and time again? Just that
46 the constitution made clear that all persons born in Australia are “native Australians”. Nothing to
47 do with “indigenous” as I wrote extensively about this issue setting it all out.
48 Then we have this “traditional custodians” now changed to “traditional owners” this even so
49 neither are part of the constitution! Any court order, as I did set out extensively in my writings
50 regarding “land rights” actually are unconstitutional! Likewise, any State/Territory legislation as
51 to Aboriginal (including Torres Strait Islanders) race.
52
Page 11
1 I understand that Peter Doherty Institute claimed that in January 2020 they had isolated the
2 (alleged) covid virus. They even as I understand it were awarded a $10,000 prize for this. And
3 well ended up as I understand it with all kinds of contract. Just that now it was as I understand
4 admitted by Peter Doherty Institute they actually never did isolate and purified the alleged covid
5 virus. Why did the Victoria Police not investigate this matter? Oh I get it, that the mass murder
6 of Australians served the NEW WORLD ORDER!
7 For legal purposes I acted as I should do and this is to request the Victoria Police to take
8 appropriate action such as conspiracy (as it take at least two to tango and justify a conspiracy
9 charge, that Banyule City Council was trespassing, vandalising Olga’s lawfully parked motor
10 vehicle, causing damage to our property, STALKING, theft, etc, etc. Well again the
11 cowards/traitors rather serve the NEW WORLD ORDER than to enforce the rule of law.
12 After all, for legal purposes I can make clear that in view of the conduct or failure to act by the
13 Victorian Police I was left to in particular protect my wife’s life as the cowards/traitors/terrorist
14 of the Victorian Police failed to do their job.
15
16 If Banyule City Council had any genuine legal grievance then it could have petitioned a court of
17 competent jurisdiction to seek to adjudicate in the matter, but obviously they rather took the law
18 into their own hands and in the process caused my wife’s life to be reduced to a human wreck,
19 unable to walk unaided on her own and having now to use a wheelchair. And now on Friday 8
20 December 2023 plan to continue their terrorism upon us. In my view the Victoria Police can
21 be sued for being an accessory to the crimes committed by Banyule City Council upon us,
22 as it had a legal duty to act having been notified of the crime spree and the harm coming
23 from this.
24
25 QUOTE 20231207-Mr G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B. to Molly Metcalf lawyer, becklegal-Supplement 7
26
27 END QUOTE 20231207-Mr G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B. to Victoria Police at Heidelberg - COMPLAINT-
28 Supplement 4
29 And
30 QUOTE 20231207-Mr G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B. to Victoria Police at Heidelberg - COMPLAINT-
31 Supplement 4
32 END QUOTE 20231207-Mr G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B. to Molly Metcalf lawyer, becklegal-Supplement 7
33
34 Whatever may eventuate on Friday 8 December 2023 the Victoria Police will be legally
35 accountable for anything that may be harmful to my wife and I.
36
37 Currently there are so called childhood vaccinations to which the State of Victoria has absolutely
38 no legal, executive and/or administrative powers where they relate to “man-kind” infectious
39 diseases, but why would police bother as they might just be happy to have a child buried in a
40 grave or end up with AUTISM, etc, as after all their job may be more important than the lives of
41 any child.
42
43 Banyule City Council pretends that they are concerned about Fire Danger and even so as I
44 understand it Fire Restrictions were implemented from 4 December nevertheless Banyule City
45 Council proves to be blatantly disregarding this. Don’t take my word for it just look at the
46 images of 7 December 2023 in Graham Road, Viewbank which are responsibility of the council!

Page 12
1
2
3 For the record I was lawfully parked when taken the images!
4
5 Why on earth has Banyule City council and allegedly Fire Rescue Victoria been so obsessed
6 about our property where there is not a shred of evidence there is a fire danger or we are having
7 some store, while right in the open there is a real fire danger and somehow both Banyule City
8 Council and Fire Rescue Victoria seems to be oblivious to the real fire danger? It merely
9 underline that the alleged fire danger and store on our property is merely an excuse to terrorise
10 my wife and I and to use any unlawful means in the process and the Victorian Police rather than
11 fining Banyule City Council for this as regardless that the legislation purports they cannot be
12 fined it is as I have set out above unconstitutional to exclude anyone from legal accountability
13 and as such the Victoria Police should early on Friday 8 December 2023 go out and inspect the
14 area (near the Graham Road roundabout in Graham Road Viewbank where previously a religious
15 centre was) and fine Banyule City Council. And while on the job also inspect the rest of Banyule
16 if only as to safeguard the community!
17
18
19
20 We need to return to the organics and legal principles embed in of our federal constitution!
21
22 This correspondence is not intended and neither must be perceived to state all issues/details.
23 Awaiting your response, G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B. (Gerrit)
24 MAY JUSTICE ALWAYS PREVAIL®

25 (Our name is our motto!)
26 END QUOTE 20231207-Mr G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B. to Victoria Police at Heidelberg - COMPLAINT-
27 Supplement 4
28
29 I did not quote ‘20231207-Mr G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B. to Molly Metcalf lawyer, becklegal-
30 Supplement 7’ as you already have this correspondence from me.

Page 13
1
2 It ought to be clear that all these trespassing’s, damages and harm upon us, in particularly upon
3 Olga, was all without any shred of legal justification and no more but political persecution
4 against not just me but also involving Olga uncalled for.
5
6 For legal purposes I had to establish that the Victorian Police failed to assist so that where
7 needed I could use CITIZEN ARREST to in particularly protect Olga’s life.
8 In my view, even so you may not have been involved in regard of the creation of the 2 purported
9 NOTIFICATION for a NOTICE OF ENTRY then I view you had a legal obligation to sort out
10 this mess created by your client. By the STALKING and trespassing your client made all kind
11 of stolen images and yet never found a shred of evidence that we operated an alleged ‘store’
12 simply because it never existed. All your client did was to use imaginary purported evidence
13 regarding it never existed in reality, and you as supposed to be an so to say accomplished lawyer
14 and expert in council issues were so to say led by the nose to fall for their rot rather then you
15 having shown competence to demand lawfully obtained “evidence” that could be used in a court
16 of law and not subjected to any challenge of trespassing, STALKING, criminal conduct, etc,
17 that the court may find such alleged evidence is inadmissible.
18
19 In my view you (Molly Metcalf) ought to be disbarred, and becklegal should have its practicing
20 license suspended and a full investigation held as to if such deplorable unlawful conduct may
21 have been the modus operandi of yourself and/or becklegal.
22
23 I, as stated above, invite you to respond as to why I should not file a complaint with the Legal
24 Service Commissioner regarding matters within 7 working days (as such not including week-
25 ends), this so I can consider what effect, if any, it may have upon any decision I may make!
26
27 Obviously, if becklegal still represents Banyule City Council then why did it not immediately
28 take appropriate action such as to make clear to its client to stop this political persecution and
29 also to us to ignore any Banyule City Council purported notices, etc. Why did becklegal not
30 offer its apology regarding its client harm inflicted in particular upon Olga, which
31 threatened her life?
32
33 Even if your client were to pursue some kind of a newly created NOTIFICATION for a
34 NOTICE OF ENTRY or seek top involve Fire Rescue Victoria then this all would be to no
35 avail, this because a court would simply hold that your client’s failure from onset to follow
36 proper legal procedures and using criminal action, including trespass and vandalism, etc, and so
37 cannot now claim any legal grounds to yet again pursue us for whatever.
38
39 Let for argument sake say that hypothetically your neighbour unlawfully entered your property
40 and discover in your house a wallet that has his identity in it and went missing from his motor
41 vehicle while parked in his driveway. He then report to the police his finding and the police
42 instead charge him for trespassing. This is because the moment he unlawfully entered your
43 property he is left without any legal grounds to claim evidence. Even if I hypothetically had a
44 stolen motor vehicle belonging to Banyule City Council (I make it clear I do not have this) but
45 had it under canvas in the driveway and Banyule City Council would have detected this while
46 trespassing, then Banyule City Council would have no legal powers to claim the motor vehicle at
47 all neither have me prosecuted because their alleged evidence was unlawfully obtained.
48
49 It is very essential to understand that if one seeks to have ones rights enforced one must act in a
50 lawful manner, failing to do so invalidate any so called “evidence” that was unlawfully obtained.
51
Page 14
1 As I indicated Section 138 allegedly denying those exercising alleged State legislative powers
2 that they cannot be sued for any legal wrongdoing is a utter and sheer nonsense as the
3 Commonwealth of Australia Constitution Act 1900 (UK) had the legal principle that any
4 Minister and their officials can be sued as like any private person. Regretfully, because of such
5 nonsense and unconstitutional kind of purported legislation Ministers and their officials in
6 particular councils have seen this as a way to violate citizen’s legal rights on the basis they
7 cannot be held legally accountable. This however needs to be correct that the constitution clearly
8 provides they can be held legally accountable. It also means that lawyers acting for and on behalf
9 of a council likewise can be sued for their wrongdoings.
10 It should be understood that an agent cannot exercise any greater power than that of the granter.
11 Like the river cannot have more water than that of the streams that feed it.
12 When therefore acting for a client a lawyer must be mindful that being a lawyer for a particular
13 party limits the powers of the lawyer as to the limits of power of that party.
14
15 The 25 October 2023 correspondence you send to me made all kind of demands that I had to
16 remove certain items from certain area’s to which your client had no legal powers.
17 Do keep in mind that even if there is legislation that purportedly provide your client with certain
18 powers in the end your client is limited that where there is a dispute (such as signs ENTRY
19 PROHIBITED then your client can only petition a court to authorise access to the property. The
20 same if the Minister himself/herself was to pursue entry, as then again the legislation cannot be
21 enforced without a court approving of it first.
22 There is no “EMERGENCY” provision that can override the constitution whatsoever, however a
23 court may rule that in certain emergency situation no legal accountability may be enforced, even
24 if awarding compensation. The USA Civil War is but an example, where afterwards the Court
25 granted compensation for the military having taken certain farmers properties.
26 Therefore, even if hypothetically Fire Rescue Victoria purportedly had trespassed upon our
27 property if there was no fire whatsoever then the courts would be well entitled to hold it was
28 unlawful and those trespassing can be held legally accountable.
29 If there was a fire, then the court would have to consider if any trespassing by whomever was in
30 the circumstances prevailing to be accepted as needed to be done to save lives, etc, or the
31 trespassing was merely done for ulterior reasons and must be held to have been unacceptable
32 intrusion not justified in the circumstances prevailing.
33 An EMERGENCY in itself may not be any justified reason to allow violation of anyone’s rights.
34 A person for example may have an emergency that his computer happens to breakdown just
35 when wanting to pay car registration that expires that day, and then decides to break in to his
36 neighbours property just to be able to just his/her computer as an emergency as to pay the
37 registration using the neighbours computer. To the person who’s computer failed it may be
38 deemed to be an emergency but unlikely would a court accept this as legally justified to break in
39 and entry of another person’s home, etc.
40 Your client on no less than 4 occasions entered a gazebo and then this obviously places the
41 question upon what legal basis?
42 Even if I were to have misplaced my keys I still would not be able to use that as an excuse to
43 trespass upon my neighbour’s property to try to gain access to my property. I would have to ask
44 my neighbour’s permission and if the neighbour is not home then I simple can do no more but
45 wait till the neighbour is home and request permission to enter and for what purpose. As such,
46 your client having on numerous occasions trespassed upon the neighbour’s property to gain
47 access to my property I view is also constituting criminal offences. In particular where they have
48 3 little girls it is essential for their safety to avoid any paedophile using alleged legal provisions
49 not to be able to rely upon that to place the safety and wellbeing of those children in jeopardy.
50

Page 15
1 I happen to visit a person and noticed he was in a considerable emotional state and suggested he
2 better relax. He gave me the understanding he was going to go to his ex-wife upon which I urged
3 him not to do so as he might likely end up in legal problems, considering his state of mind. He
4 left and well I understood he was charged subsequently. I refused to assist him because I had
5 warned him beforehand not to go considering his emotional state, and while it was his right to do
6 what he wanted but then I wanted no part of his legal problems.
7
8 Victoria’s Letter Patent provides for the Governor to provide for an impartial administration of
9 justice, which means the courts cannot take sides with any party appearing before it but must
10 adjudicate impartially upon the evidence presented before it. The court cannot enforce any kind
11 of purported legislation that conflicts the legal principles embedded in the constitution, because
12 the judge would immediately revert to a private citizen the moment violating the constitution and
13 is no longer a judge. As such, he cannot even finish the hearing before him/her because no
14 private person can adjudicate in a competent court of jurisdiction.
15 As such, if all and any purported legislation your client may have relied upon are not applicable
16 then the courts are bound to say so. And, where you, so becklegal, as purportedly professional
17 lawyers with council experiences nevertheless failed to act appropriately then you can be deemed
18 associates to the crimes your client committed. As an agent you may not be able to control the
19 grantor (your client) as to commit any unlawful conduct, but you can and must take appropriate
20 action to ensure you are not and cannot be seen to condone or excuse your grantor’s unlawful
21 conduct by fancy irrelevant excuses knowing that considerable harm was inflicted upon us, in
22 particularly upon Olga. Your client may very well have been boosted in conducting criminal
23 offences ongoing by that your 25 October 2023 correspondence somehow may have been
24 understood to justify their criminal conduct. Albeit, your client from my writings ought to have
25 known better, in particular where I provided them with considerable set out, and so your client
26 could have consulted you as to what was legally appropriate. Your client cannot play the
27 ignorant game and obviously if they did consult you about what I stated and you may have
28 advised them to ignore it all then obviously the courts may hold you liable for such purported
29 advise as you ought to have known that your clients have to follow proper legal procedures and
30 cannot take the law into its own hands. And your communication with your client would no
31 longer have the client-lawyer privileges because it relates to criminal offences to which you
32 directly/indirectly may be deemed to have participated with.
33
34
35
36 We need to return to the organics and legal principles embed in of our federal constitution!
37
38 This correspondence is not intended and neither must be perceived to state all issues/details.
39 Awaiting your response, G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B. (Gerrit)
40 MAY JUSTICE ALWAYS PREVAIL®

41 (Our name is our motto!)

20231209-Mr G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B. To Lawyers Molly Metcalf, Becklegal-Supplement 8-InVITATION

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

20231209-Mr G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B. To Lawyers Molly Metcalf, Becklegal-Supplement 8-InVITATION

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Page 1

9-12-2023 Page 1 © Mr G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B.

9-12-2023 Page 4 © Mr G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B.

9-12-2023 Page 8 © Mr G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B.

9-12-2023 Page 9 © Mr G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B.

9-12-2023 Page 11 © Mr G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B.

24 MAY JUSTICE ALWAYS PREVAIL®

9-12-2023 Page 12 © Mr G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B.

9-12-2023 Page 14 © Mr G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B.

40 MAY JUSTICE ALWAYS PREVAIL®

You might also like