20231205-Mr G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B. To Victoria Police at Heidelberg - COMPLAINT-Supplement 3

Page 1
1
2
3 Victoria Police at Heidelberg (Australia, Victoria date) 5-12-2023
4 HEIDELBERG.UNI@police.vic.gov.au
5
6 20231205-Mr G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B. to Victoria Police at Heidelberg - COMPLAINT-Supplement 5
7
8 Sir/Madam,
9 QUOTE 20231202-Mr G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B. to Victoria Police at Heidelberg - COMPLAINT-Supplement 2
10 QUOTE my 30-11-2023 COMPLAINT
11 further to my 29-11-2023 COMPLAINT I now request the Victoria Police to assist my
12 wife and I to obtain an intervention/restraining order against Banyule City Council and
13 any employee, councillor and/or anyone who may be acting for and on its behalf.
14 END QUOTE my 30-11-2023 COMPLAINT
15
16 As I indicated that the sections 134, 135 and 137 of the Planning & Environment Act 1987 was
17 not applicable. The legislation refers to “Order prohibiting the use or development of land
18 under this Act and the Building Act 1993 for period of time”, and no order prohibiting, at
19 least to my knowledge exist. The order relates to when a person applies for a building permit and
20 once the permit has been completed and approved then this section no longer is applicable.
21 END QUOTE 20231202-Mr G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B. to Victoria Police at Heidelberg - COMPLAINT-Supplement 2
22
23 As I indicated there is no such “Order prohibiting the use or development of land under this
24 Act and the Building Act 1993 for period of time” to my knowledge existing at all against our
25 property.
26
27 Obviously, where my wife is in ill health and this ongoing trespassing does affect her health, as
28 today in the morning her heart rate was about 80 but soon after my wife became aware of the
29 notice regarding 8 December 2023 her heart rate increased to 11 and 5 minutes later to 113.
30 It cannot be claimed that the Victoria Police at Heidelberg didn’t have any information as my
31 previous correspondences certain provided ample of information and as the Victoria Police
32 might not have bothered to check the documentation available at my blog
33 https://www.scribd.com/inspectorrikati
34 I will specifically refer to Page 15 and further of the document:
35
36 http://www.austlii.edu.au/au/legis/vic/consol_act/paea1987254/
37 PLANNING AND ENVIRONMENT ACT 1987 - AustLII
38 Division 1--Exhibition and notice of amendment · 17 Copies of amendment to be given to
39 certain persons · 18 Availability of amendment · 19 What notice of an ...
40 QUOTE
41 Division 2A—Order prohibiting the use or development of land under
42 this Act and the Building Act 1993 for period of time
43
44 This cannot be used against us as there is no order existing.
45
46 I will however first reproduce nearly total copies of the purported notices:
47
6-12-2023 Page 1 © Mr G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B.
INSPECTOR-RIKATI® about the BLACK HOLE in the CONSTITUTION-DVD
A 1st edition limited special numbered book on Data DVD ISBN 978-0-9803712-6-0
PLEASE NOTE: You may order books in the INSPECTOR-RIKATI® series by making a reservation, or E-mail
admin@inspector-rikati.com See also www.scribd.com/inspectorrikati
Page 2
1
2
3 At the bottom of the page the word “direct” should be ‘directly” but by taking the photograph it
4 was left off in part, albeit unintended.
5
6 The next purported notice is also dated 29 November 2023 but now the date of 1 December 2023
7 has now shown to be 8 December 2023.
8

Page 3
1
2
3 Again, the notice is purportedly in relation to some alleged “Order prohibiting the use or
4 development of land under this Act and the Building Act 1993 for period of time” and
5 obviously the Victoria Police merely has to ask Banyule City Council to prove such an order
6 exist and if not then clearly their already 3 times trespassing lacks any alleged legal validity.
7
8 In my view, if the Victoria Police fails to act appropriately despite having been informed that
9 there has been repeated trespassing causing not only damages but serious harmn to my wife’s
10 health then in the end the court may hold the Victoria Police to be an a\ccessory to the criminal
Page 4
1 trespass as much as citizens are required to report and/or prevent criminal conduct within their
2 ability likewise so the Victorian Police cannot stand by idle and blatantly disregard my 91-year-
3 old wife’s life unlawfully being placed at risk.
4
5 It may be noted that on Wednesday 29 November 2023 I personally stated to Angela O’Brien
6 and her male accomplish that they were trespassing, when they were found by me along the side
7 of the house within our property and she gave me the understanding having climbed over the
8 fence to gain entry from the neighbours property.
9
10 What we therefore have i9s that Angela O’Brien was well aware that I had informed her she was
11 trespassing.
12
13
14 The 29 November 2023 purported notification may I assume have been drafter after that,
15 disregarding she was informed she was trespassing and as such persist in the trespassing conduct.
16
17 It may also be noted that even if Angela O’Brien had mailed the 29 November 22023, in view
18 that it was in the letterbox, but may have been posted on the various dates up to and including
19 the postal marking being 1 December 2023, as shown in the left side lower area of the following
20 image
21
22
23
24 If therefore the intent had been not to proceed with the 1 December 2023 trespassing, as
25 contemplated on 29 November 2023 then why was this notified to us? It clearly underlines a
26 deliberate undue harassment.
27 The mere fact that the purported notification was forwarded via Australia Post may underline
28 that Angela O’Brien was well aware that she had been trespassing and didn’t need to!
29
30 After the Wednesday 29 November 2023 trespass I forwarded the following documentsa:
31
32 My wife’s heart rate went from 72 to 121 finding Banyule City Council bashing at the
33 door in violation of ENTRY PROHIBITED signage, resulting my wife now in bed
34 trying to recover from the shock. Let the rule of law prevail!
35 You can download the document from:
36 https://www.scribd.com/document/688175535/20231129-Mr-G-H-Schorel-Hlavka-O-W-B-to-Lawyers-
37 Molly-Metcalf-Becklegal-Supplement-3
38
39 Banyule City Council referred to using the police, and well let the Victoria Police now
40 charge Banyule City Council law breakers and uphold the rule of law.
42 https://www.scribd.com/document/688245929/20231129-Mr-G-H-Schorel-Hlavka-O-W-B-to-Victoria-Police-
43 at-Heidelberg-COMPLAINT
44

Page 5
1 The question is now, will the Victoria Police act to ensure a intervention/restraining order
2 be issued against Banyule City Council and its staff and anyone else acting for and on its
3 behalf or ultimately I have to exercise citizen arrest to safeguard my wife’s life?
6 at-Heidelberg-COMPLAINT-Supplement-1
7
8 I understood Senator Malcolm Roberts (One Nation) made clear to stand up for not only
9 his rights but also that of his family and others. This, I do likewise in my own manner to
10 stand up against the tyranny!
12 https://www.scribd.com/document/688307914/20231130-Mr-G-H-Schorel-Hlavka-O-W-B-to-Banyule-City-
13 Council-Cr-Castaldo-and-Ors-TRESPASS-Etc-Supplement-16
14
15 (incorrect attachment was added)
16 Far too often residents are bullied by councils and their lawyers and perhaps my
17 writings may assist others to pursue JUSTICE. Now I am pursuing legal
18 accountability against the wrongdoers.
22
23 Far too often residents are bullied by councils and their lawyers and perhaps my
24 writings may assist others to pursue JUSTICE. Now I am pursuing legal
25 accountability against the wrongdoers. Including request for Victoria Police to obtain
26 intervention/restraining order.
30
31 In my view lawyer M Metcalf should be disbarred and the lawfirm ‘becklegal’
32 suspended as a law practice, and Banyule City Council to be replaced by an
33 administrator and a proper investigation to be held.
37
38 In my view the police should never merely take the word of a lawyer or council but should
39 properly investigate, as I proved council and lawyer deceptively claiming legal rights and in
40 the process placing my wife’s life at undue risk!
43 at-Heidelberg-COMPLAINT-Supplement-2
44
45 Considering Banyule City Council could have for many years lawfully entered the property
46 but didn’t do so and now pursue trespassing then this may underline it never was about
47 enforcement of the rule of law but rather political persecution.
49 https://www.scribd.com/document/689530120/20231204-Mr-G-H-Schorel-Hlavka-O-W-B-to-Banyule-City-
50 Council-Cr-Mayor-Tom-Melican-and-Ors-TRESPASS-Etc-Supplement-17
51
52 It appears to me that this Angela O’Brien is some lose cannot totally out of control and Banyule
53 City Council simply let her do whatever, no one bothering to check the legality of what she is
54 doing. The mere fact that even the alleged involvement of Jan Richardson of Banyule City
Page 6
1 Council to investigate whatever has not resulted in any backing off of the STALKING,
2 harassment, TERRORISM etc. In my view Mayor Tom Milican should have immediately made
3 it his priority that where he was provided with my writings as to ensure that no further problems
4 would go on from Banyule City Council until all relevant matters were fully investigated.
5 In view t5hat it appears to me the Victoria Police fails to do its duty then clearly it is left up to
6 me to more than likely do any CITIZEN ARREST upon anyone who trespasses upon the
7 property. And if Banyule City Council abandoned any trespassing on F8iday 2023 due to the
8 changes to the fencing and perhaps now desire to come with whatever tools to destroy
9 fencing/gates, etc. then I am left to protect my wife’s life as a priority!
10
11 QUOTE 20231201-Mr G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B. to Molly Metcalf lawyer, becklegal-Supplement 5
12 Molly Metcalf Lawyer, becklegal (Australia, Victoria date) 1-12-2023
13 mmetcalf@becklegal.com.au
14
15 Cc: Cr Alison Champion alison.champion@banyule.vic.gov.au
16 Cr Fiona Mitsinikos fiona.mitsdinikos@banyule.vic.gov.au
17 Cr Elizabeth Nealy elizabeth.nealy@banyule.vic.gov.au
18 Cr Mark Di Pasquate mark.dipasquale@banyule.vic.gov.au
19 Cr Alida McKern alida.mckern@banyule.vic.gov.au
20 Cr Peter Dimarelos peter.demarelos@banyule.vic.gov.au
21 Cr Rick Garotti rick.garotti@banyule.vic.gov.au
22 Cr Tom Melican tom.melican@banyule.vic.gov.au
23 Cr Peter Casteldo peter.castaldo@banyule.vic.gov.au
24 Mr RomanWojtkowski enquiries@banyule.vic.gov.au
25 Jan Richarson enquiries@banyule.vic.gov.au
26 Officer Janet Redgrave Team Leader Development Planning enquiries@banyule.vic.gov.au
27 Banyule City Council enquiries@banyule.vic.gov.au
28
29 Re: 20231201-Mr G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B. to Molly Metcalf lawyer, becklegal-Supplement 5
30
31 NOT RESTRICTED FOR PUBLICATION
32 COMPLAINT-Supplement 5
33 Madam,
34 After the purported service of a notice that Banyule City Council staff were to attend to
35 our property on 1 December 2023 at about 1 PM this ended up with a so to say no show. Perhaps
36 because I requested the Victorian Police as followed:
37
38 QUOTE 20231130-Mr G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B. to Victoria Police at Heidelberg - COMPLAINT-
39 Supplement 1
40 Victoria Police at Heidelberg (Australia, Victoria date) 30-11-2023
41 HEIDELBERG.UNI@police.vic.gov.au
42
43 20231130-Mr G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B. to Victoria Police at Heidelberg - COMPLAINT-Supplement 1
44
45 Sir/Madam,
46
47 further to my 29-11-2023 COMPLAINT I now request the Victoria Police to assist my wife and
48 I to obtain an intervention/restraining order against Banyule City Council and any employee,
49 councillor and/or anyone who may be acting for and on its behalf.
50
51 As I did set point previously due to Banyule City Council staff on Wednesday 29 November
52 2023 trespassing again upon our property and the male person banging on the door, etc, causing
53 my wife to fear this unknown person to her was trying to break into the house.
54 QUOTE
55 This matter is obviously very serious as my wife already being a heart failure patient
56 now suffered considerably that her heart rate went from 72 to a massive 121.
57 END QUOTE
Page 7
1
2 This jeopardize her life.
3
4 We have signage’s throughout the property ENTRY PROHIBITED and as such this kind of
5 trespassing is in blatant ignorance to the signs.
6
7
8 What we appear to have is:
9  Trespass on 6 September 2023 of 107 Graham Road Viewbank, using this to unlawfully
10 make one or more images and causing damage to water supply line.
11  Trespass upon 105 Graham Road Viewbank for the purpose to trespass upon the property
12 of 107 Graham road, Viewbank
13  Trespass upon the property of 107 Graham Road Viewbank causing damage to the
14 disability Mobility Scooter by the side mirror being smashed. Causing a car battery
15 charger to go missing and twice entering a building structure unlawfully and moving
16 about the property making unlawfully recordings (images), etc.
17  Trespassing upon 105 Graham Road, Viewbank to leave the property of 107 Graham
18 Road Viewbank.
19  Trespassing upon the Ford AU motor vehicle registered and owned by Mrs Olga Hlavka-
20 Schorel, and vandalising the vehicle with a sticker, even so the motor vehicle was
21 lawfully parked in front of our property at 107 Graham Road, Viewbank, and by this
22 causing considerable harm upon my wife, due to the stress regarding the trespassing, etc.
23  Trespassing on 29 November 2023 upon the property of 105 Graham road Viewbank to
24 trespass upon the property of 107 Graham Road, Viewbank.
25  Trespassing on 29 November 2023 on the property of 107 Graham Road, Viewbank, and
26 twice entering a building structure unlawfully and banging on a door causing
27 considerable harm (fear, stress, etc.) upon my wife that her heart rate went from about 72
28 to 121 and resulted to considerable stress that my wife no longer was able to continue
29 what she was doing and had to go to bed, after she had awoken me to attend to matters.
30  My wife gave me the understanding that the male (Banyule City Council officer) was
31 banging so much on the door that she feared he was trying to breakdown the door. She
32 didn’t know who he was, and as such feared for her life, when she woke me up that
33 someone was trying to break in.
34  Threatening to have Banyule City Council officers to return on Friday 1 December 2023
35 on about 1 pm by this causing my wife having to cancel her medical appointment with
36 her GP.
37  Trespassing onto the property of 105 Graham Road Viewbank as to leave the property of
38 107 Graham Road Viewbank.

Page 8
1  Other related issues such as causing undue harm, denial of rights, etc. The lawyer as I
2 view it making false and misleading claims in regard of Fire Rescue Victoria, etc.
3
4 It appears to me that Officer Janet Redgrave Team Leader Development Planning might be the
5 person behind most if not all of it, and might be considered an accessory to it all.
6
7 I understand Banyule City council is claiming to rely upon alleged legal provisions but refused to
8 in court, well aware they are not valid for the purpose they are pursuing.
9 As Banyule City Council staff Angela O’Brien indicated that Banyule City Council will again
10 return on Friday 1 December 2023 at about 1 pm this places me in a very difficult situation
11 that without the Victoria Police obtaining an interim intervention/restraining order against
12 Banyule City Council, its employees and anyone else acting for and on behalf of it then I may
13 have no alternative to execute possibly a citizen arrest upon all and any person who are
14 trespassing because of having to act to avoid my wife to lose her life due to the stress, etc,
15 causing her heart rate to increase to a dangerous level.
16 While Banyule City Council purportedly seek to rely upon Section 134, 135 and 137 of the
17 Planning & Environment Act 1987 whereas formally the lawyer claimed top rely (falsely) upon
18 Section 32 of the Fire Rescue Victoria provision, I hold that the usage of those provisions are not
19 valid in the circumstances and Banyule City Council should petition a court of competent
20 jurisdiction if it seeks to enforce this, allowing me to present to the court why they are not valid
21 for enforcement, etc.
22
23 I am well aware that this is all along a political persecution against me, however to include my
24 wife in this where her perhaps last days of life might be limited I view she is entitled to be
25 protected against such harassment, stalking, terrorism, etc.
26 It ought to be very clear that if Banyule City Council had a genuine issue to litigate it would have
27 be doing so long ago, the fact that it didn’t litigate may underlines it seeks to abuse its assumed
28 powers and that I view should be stopped.
29
30 Because of the risk to my wife’s life I hold I am entitled to exercise any citizen arrest to
31 safeguard her as much as possible however prefer the Victorian Police to ensure the court issue a
32 interim intervention/restraining order against Banyule City Council, its staff and any one acting
33 for or on behalf of Banyule City Council so that at least my wife in the time she has remain
34 among the living will be able to do so in safety, peace and tranquillity.
35
36 There are no know court orders against my wife Olga Hlavka-Schorel and/or against me Gerrit
37 Schorel-Hlavka!
38
39 Due to the stress caused upon my wife by the vandalising of her motor vehicle Ford AU she
40 ended up relying upon a wheelchair and she fear that if I were to go out to obtain household
41 supplies like groceries and/or collect items from Australia Post I ordered such as regarding
42 disability items to assist her, that Banyule City Council might then terrorise her in my absence
43 and so is fearful without having protection of an intervention/restraining order.
44
45 I can provide the police with copies of all documents I wrote regarding the trespass and related
46 issues albeit they all have been published at my blog at https://www.scribd.com/inspectorrikati.
47 END QUOTE 20231130-Mr G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B. to Victoria Police at Heidelberg - COMPLAINT-
48 Supplement 1
49
50 As a lawyer it is my view you should understand the very basics of dispute between parties and
51 related litigation. As such, taking the law into its mown hand (your client Banyule City Council)
52 is not permissible.
Page 9
1 The disputes between Banyule City Council and myself have been going on for about 15
2 years. I will briefly explain some matters.
3
4 As part of MAY JUSTICE ALWAYS PREVAIL® I used at times to represent (free of
5 charge) parties in litigation, albeit my principle interest was constitutional matters. Not
6 u8ncommon people would contact me about unfairly (so they held) being issued with an
7 infringement notice for exceeding parking limits even so they knew they had not done so. I was
8 simply unable to allocate my time to the numerous complaints as to assist them in litigation.
9 However, in 2008 Banyule City Council issued me with a parking infringement notice for
10 exceeding 3 hours and well, I wasn’t going to fall for this terrorism/fraud/extortion. While it
11 might be a money making system for a council, and I understand many other councils use this
12 kind of extortion, I was going to oppose this. I lodged a complaint and Banyule City Council
13 responded my appeal was dismissed and no further appeal was possible and the matter would go
14 to court. I am well aware that the Infringement Court is unconstitutional but made clear I would
15 expose to the court how Banyule City Council claimed I had exceeded 3 hours parking limit
16 while its own records proved I had been parked for 2 hours and 29 minutes! Banyule City
17 Council then miraculously responded that my appeal was upheld! It was clear that Banyule City
18 Council all along knew from its own records I had been recorded to have been parked for 2 hours
19 and 29 minutes but nevertheless dismissed my appeal in the first place to pursue their extortion
20 scheme. But what about all the other motorist then also wrongly having an infringement notice
21 against them? Well as a registrar made clear most motorist will rather pay then to have to lose a
22 days of work (so pay) and risk likely to lose anyhow as the court will trust the official. Nice
23 extortion scheme but also unduly causing motorist to lose one of more points of their licence for
24 something that they never were guilty off. My investigation also showed that at time an
25 infringement notice is issued and then afterwards the copy provided to the Infringement Court
26 has details altered to make it more sever and so without the person against whom the
27 Infringement Notice was issued having a clue this fraud was perpetrated.
28 This kind of scam is also perpetrated by sticking on motor vehicle a sticker for being parked
29 unlawfully, etc (such as on 7 September 2023 regarding my wife’s Ford AU) so that the council
30 then purport to have an excuse to tow the vehicle away and cause huge cost upon the motor
31 vehicle owner and that may include litigation to try to get the vehicle back, but may be charged
32 holding cost for the duration the motor vehicle was impounded.
33 Did anyone check back how many other motorist were wrongly have an Infringement Notice
34 issued as I was that day, and cancelled any such infringement notice and refunded any financial
35 loss to the motors? I do not think so.
36 Obviously, I was aware that I would cop the rot of Banyule City Council as retaliation of
37 exposing the rot.
38 Even when I was standing in elections I was warned that my how-to-vote cards were removed by
39 the elector officer the moment I left the area, but not those of other candidates.
40
41 In the 2010 state election Banyule City Council to assist then councillor Anthony Carbine
42 (Labor) (the current Minister for Police) then removed my banners/posters (unlawfully) and
43 many were dumped in my driveway slashed up. The police attended and noted this.
44
45 In 1917 I was requested to do a private investigation into the murder of Carl Williams. I had
46 never had any interest in matters relating to Carl Williams but held I might as well investigate. I
47 was provided with a box of paperwork which I all scanned and discovered that Carl Williams
48 wrote that he suspected (that was in 2010 – just before his murder) that his lawyer Nicola Gobbo
49 was a police informer.
50
51
Page 10
1
2 http://www.abc.net.au/news/2013-02-28/court-told-cop-had-secret-relationship-with-
3 willliams/4542842
4 QUOTE Cop had secret relationship with Carl Williams
5 Cop had secret relationship with Carl Williams
6 By court reporter Sarah Farnsworth
7 Updated 1 Mar 2013, 8:02amFri 1 Mar 2013, 8:02am
8 Sorry, this video has expired
9 Video: Cop had secret relationship with Carl Williams, court told (7pm TV News VIC)
10 Photo: Paul Dale has pleaded not guilty to giving false and misleading evidence. (Joe Castro, file
11 photo: AAP)
12 Map: VIC
13 A Supreme Court jury has heard a former Victoria Police detective had a secret relationship with
14 Melbourne drug boss Carl Williams.
15 The court heard the former drug squad detective, Paul Dale, was summoned to hearings before the
16 Australian Crime Commission (ACC) in 2007 and 2008 and quizzed over his relationship with
17 Williams.
18 The ACC was investigating the murders of police informer Terrence Hodson and his wife in 2004.
19 The prosecution alleges Dale lied to the commission, as he knew he was suspected of involvement
20 in the double murder.
21 Prosecutor Christopher Beale SC told the jury Dale had an ongoing, "off-the-record" secret
22 relationship with Williams.
23 But he told the ACC it was all above board and that he had informed the force of planned meetings
24 with the notorious gangland figure on two occasions in 2003.
25 Dale said he had an accidental run-in with him on one occasion.
26 In 2003, a court heard Dale was suspended from the police force after he was charged over a
27 burglary in Oakleigh.
28 Hodson had accused Dale of being involved in the crime and was due to give evidence against him
29 before he was murdered.
30 The jury was played a phone call recorded in February 2004.
31 Photo: Carl Williams was killed while in prison in 2010. (Jason South, file photo: AAP)
32 In it, Dale tells Williams that he has been hoping to catch up with him for a while.
33 He later told the ACC that was a "throw-away line".
34 The court heard Dale also called Williams's father, George Williams, on May 2, 2004, using a
35 phone registered in another name.
36 In the brief call, Dale asks for Carl Williams to call a go-between, barrister Nicola Gobbo, who was
37 Dale's close friend and confidant. She was also Williams's lawyer.
38 Mr Beale told the jury that 14 days later the Hodsons were killed. Charges against Dale were later
39 dropped.
40 The court heard that after Dale was quizzed by the ACC in November 2008, he met with Ms
41 Gobbo, unaware she was wearing a wire.
42 Mr Beale said Dale told his friend about his suspicion that Williams had given detailed statements
43 against him, including details only Dale and Williams knew, such as clandestine meetings at the
44 Keilor Baths.
45 END QUOTE Cop had secret relationship with Carl Williams
46
47 http://www.thecourier.com.au/story/1348767/dale-admits-affair-with-barrister-gobbo/?cs=7
48 QUOTE Dale admits affair with barrister Gobbo
49 Dale admits affair with barrister Gobbo
50 Mark Russell
51 7 Mar 2013, 4:41 p.m.
52
53 We do things differently!! Come on in and check us out.
54 0355... Show Number

Page 11
1 During questioning by the Australian Crime Commission in 2008, drug squad detective Paul Dale
2 admitted having several extramarital affairs, including one with barrister Nicola Gobbo, a court
3 heard on Thursday.
4 "I've had a number of drunken escapades with Nicola Gobbo," Mr Dale said during the December
5 2008 interview.
6 Mr Dale told investigators he did not recall ever discussing with Ms Gobbo the murders of police
7 informant Terrence Hodson and his wife Christine.
8 "Nothing rings a bell," Mr Dale said in a videotape of the 2008 ACC interview played to the
9 Supreme Court jury today during Mr Dale's trial.
10 Asked if Ms Gobbo had ever told him who she believed murdered the Hodsons, Mr Dale said: "I
11 don't believe so."
12 Mr Dale said he had two other extramarital affairs with policewomen, as well as with Ms Gobbo.
13 He could not remember one of the women's mobile phone numbers but said he didn't even know
14 his wife's number. That number was on speed dial.
15 Mr Dale went on to deny to the ACC that he had approached underworld boss Carl Williams to
16 arrange the murders of the Hodsons.
17 He said he had no direct involvement in the murders.
18 END QUOTE Dale admits affair with barrister Gobbo
19
20
Page 12
1
2 I did write to the Victoria Ombudsman
3 “20170907-G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B. to Victorian Ombudsman”
4 Who then responded that my writing was beyond 12 months.
5
6 QUOTE 20170911-G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B. to Victorian Ombudsman
7 Victorian Ombudsman 11-9-2017
8 ombudvic@ombudsman.vic.gov.au
9 Ref: 20170911-G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B. to Victorian Ombudsman
10 Sir/Madam,
11 in response to the email I received on 11 September 2017 from Christopher Stenton
12 Investigation Officer (Ombudsman) to which I quote his writings as follows, I REQUEST
13 YOU TO PROVIDE ME WITH A COPY OF THE ALLEGED COMPLAINT that
14 Christopher Stenton refers to of October 2013 (not that I concede having then made such
15 complaint):
16 QUOTE
17 11 September 2017 | File No: C/17/16695 |
18 |------------------------------------+------------------------------------|
19
20 Mr G.H. Schorel-Hlavka
21 By email: admin@inspector-rikati.com
22
23
24 Dear Mr G.H. Schorel-Hlavka
25
26 Your complaint about the Investigation into Corrections Victoria’s handling
27 of the death of Mr Carl Williams
28
29
30 Thank you for your emailed complaint dated 4 September 2017 about the
31 Investigation into Corrections Victoria’s handling of the death of Mr Carl
32 Williams.
33
34 Under our governing legislation, the Ombudsman Act 1973, our office may not
35 intervene in complaints that are over twelve months old. This is because
36 information, events and circumstances deteriorate as time goes on.
37
38 For this reason, I do not intend to consider your complaint any further. I
39 appreciate this may not be the outcome you hoped for.
40 It is understood that you initially phoned the Victorian Ombudsman seeking
41 assistance with this matter in October of 2013. At this time you were
42 advised to write to the Council seeking to have your complaint addressed.
43 As this complaint refers to a matter that occurred greater than 12 months
44 ago, and you have not contacted our office since, our office is generally
45 not able to consider such complaints under the Ombudsman Act 1973.
46
47 If you have any queries, please contact me on 9613 6222 or 1800 806 314
48 (regional callers only). Please quote reference number C/17/16695.
49
50 Yours sincerely
51
52 (Embedded image moved to file: pic28503.jpg)
53
54
55 Christopher Stenton
56 Investigation Officer
57 END QUOTE
58 I didn't to my knowledge/recollection refer to any Mr Carl Williams matter as a complaint in

59 2013, this as it was not until May 2017 that I was requested by a 3rd party to attend to those
60 matters. Until then Mr Carl Williams issues were virtually unknown to me. As such the 12

Page 13
1 month period you refer to can only commence to be calculated from 28 May 2017, when
2 according to my records I then first contacted the Ombudsman about the Carl Williams case.
3
4 The perpetual calendar may be of assistance that you can work out the time period from 28 May
5 2017 to 4 September 2017 (being the date referred to) being less than 4 months!
6 In my previous writings regarding the Mr Carl Williams issues I have now identified documents
7 that were written by Mr Carl Williams to Mr Steve Smith on 28 January 2010 as well as on 14-2-
8 2009 About Nicola Gobbo and Paul Dale, etc. From that it appears to me that this relates to
9 Detective Inspector Steve Smith and that there was so to say some working relationship between
10 them and not merely a Detective Inspector having ordinary contact in a professional manner as a
11 police officer. The date of 28 January 2016 obviously was incorrect as it should have been 2010
12 as shown by the perpetual calendar. All writings of Mr Carl Williams of that day actually were
13 dated 28 January 2016.
14
15 I did notice that the VGSO (State Government Solicitors Office) in 2015 seemed to me to use
16 delay tactics to have matters dealt with and asked for unsubstantiated details from Spicer
17 Lawyers. The documentation that I have read in my view very much clarifies details but may
18 never have been used by the lawyers.
19 Because the Ombudsman did its investigation and handed to the Victorian Parliament a report It
20 appears to me to be the proper manner for me to have expressed my concerns as a 'concerned
21 citizens' to the Ombudsman so the Ombudsman may re-open the investigation without that I so
22 to say awaken sleeping dogs by publishing certain details on my blog.
23 Considering that ‘David Prideaux’ (I understand was the Prison Governor at the time of the
24 unlawful killing of Mr Carl Williams) disappeared shortly after the unlawful killing of Mr Carl
25 Williams and allegedly had confidential details of Mr Carl Williams in his vehicle then surely if
26 there is another so to say take upon matters that may indicate Detective Inspector Steve Smith

Page 14
1 may have had a more closer relationship with Mr Carl Williams then just professional then the
2 Ombudsman would be well entitled to re-open the investigation and/or recommend that in the
3 circumstances the Coroner's Court ought to reconsider investigating the matter in the overall.
4 I look forwards to you clarifying the matters and that I did not in October 2013 filed a complaint
5 regarding Mr Carl Williams issue, and the 12 months period since 28 May 2017 has not
6 exceeded.
7 QUOTE
8 Under our governing legislation, the Ombudsman Act 1973, our office may not
9 intervene in complaints that are over twelve months old. This is because
10 information, events and circumstances deteriorate as time goes on.
11 END QUOTE
12 Also, my writings are based upon documents and not upon recollection of anyone neither that the
13 details could have deteriorated over time. As such, those recorded details are a matter of records
14 and cannot be altered over time.
15 Perhaps, the Ombudsman may desire not to investigate as to avoid any possible embarrassment
16 that the investigation was defective and the declared death of ‘David Prideaux’ may have been
17 defective in its investigation also.
18 As I understand it from the writings of Mr Carl Williams that he was very much involved in
19 exposing corruption within the Victorian Police force, that I perceived was well beyond just
20 former police officer Mr Paul Dale.
21 I suspect that the Ethical Standards Department/Independent Broad-Based Anti-Corruption

22 Commission likely had more relevant details in its possession which may have been excluded
23 from the Ombudsman investigation, where they after all by warrant had obtained the computer of
24 Mr Carl Williams. Likely they may have deleted sensitive filed from the computer hard drive
25 also to perhaps cover up matters. The Ombudsman for himself/herself merely has to check if
26 certain files from Mr Carl Williams’s computer were in fact placed before the Ombudsman
27 during the investigation.
28 As His Honour Walsh J in 1985 commented about my tactics of cross-examination of witnesses

29 that I was conducting matters as a TRAPDOOR SPIDER. That I would persist to explore and
30 obtain more and more details during cross-examinations.
31 In my view the Ombudsman ought to recommend a coronial inquest if not reopening the
32 investigation itself!
33
34 This correspondence is not intended and neither must be perceived to set out all details.
35 Awaiting your response, G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B. (Friends call me Gerrit)
36
37 MAY JUSTICE ALWAYS PREVAIL ®
38 (Our name is our motto!)

39 END QUOTE 20170911-G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B. to Victorian Ombudsman
40
41 While there is a lot more to it all it should be clear that the Victorian Ombudsman railroaded my
42 complaint as purporting to have been commence in 2013 when it was not until 2017 I was
43 requested to investigate and therefore the Victorian Ombudsman in my view was covering up
44 criminal conduct. This because regarding general manager David Prideaux’ seemed to expose
45 he may have been killed/missing only a few weeks after his possible involvement with the Carl
46 Williams murder, and also the Victorian Ombudsman also informed that his report appeared to
Page 15
1 me to omit the involvement of a police officer delivering a CD to Carl Williams even so the
2 prison had records about this, that therefore the Victoria Ombudsman, the Supreme Court, IBAC
3 (as now known) and others including the ATO preferred no further exposure.
4 Fort e3xample the ATO pursued matter to “AVERT” even so I did inform them that they could
5 not apply any AVERMENT because on 4 August 2005 in AEC v Schorel-Hlavka (representing
6 myself) I had successfully opposed AVERMENT to be used by the Commonwealth in a State
7 court exercising federal jurisdiction.
8
9 Subsequently, to my exposure a former (so I was informed) police officer destroyed my newly
10 part build fence that was situated within my property boundary (not being a joined fence) and I
11 had an estimate to build a new fence would be about $10,000.00 I did lodge with the police a
12 complaint but no response from this. To me it was effectively a message by the police to stop
13 exposing their criminal conduct. Just that I didn’t stop.
14 When then Andrew Carbines (the former Banyule City Council councillor) became Police
15 Minister I made various complaints including the unconstitutional/unlawful covid scam
16 mandates, etc. And published documents at my blog at https://www.scribd.com/inspectorrikati.
17 And well, to no surprise to me Banyule City Council seemed to me to get back involved to
18 terrorise not just myself but also my wife.
19
20 What seems to be that in May Tamara left a Banyule City Council card in the letterbox, at least
21 there is where I located it. I twice requested clarification of what was going on but no
22 clarification resulted. That was a warning sign to me also.
23 Then on 6 September 20223 Banyule City Council staff trespassed upon my property despite
24 signage that ENTRY PROHIBITED with relevant Authorities listed.
25 On 7 September 2023 again Banyule City Council officer via trespassing upon my neighbours
26 property climbed over fencing material to unlawfully gain access to my property and entered
27 unlawfully a Gazebo and continued to the back of the property and made images there and back
28 in the front again unlawfully entering the gazebo. After again trespassing upon my neighbours
29 property then Angela O’Brien vandalised my wife’s registered and lawfully parked Ford AU,
30 having left her name on a sticker stuck to the windscreen.
31 On 8 September 2023 then Banyule City Council posted a letter including images that Banyule
32 City Council unlawfully had made while trespassing upon my property (my property includes a
33 reference to my wife). My response was that the alleged evidence (images) were obtained by
34 trespassing and as such couldn’t be relied upon for any purposes. , etc. Well then M Metcalf of
35 becklegal forwarded a 25 October 2023 correspondence making known that Banyule City
36 Council had in 2018, 2019, 2020, 2021, 2022 and on 16 September 2023 obtained aerial images
37 of the property.
38 As those images were made targeting my property and as such were not general images, it is
39 clear that Banyule City Council had been in violation to the Crimes Act (Vic) been STALKING
40 the property, which means that those images neither can be used as “evidence” by Banyule City
41 Council! This attempt to use the aerial images as some excuse clearly did no more but prove that
42 their client Banyule City Council had all along been STALKING our property. But, because I
43 made clear the images of 6 & 7 September 2023 couldn’t be lawfully used M Metcalf tried to
44 make out that within Section 32 of the Fire Rescue Victoria Banyule City Council had the right
45 to enter the property. Well, this nonsense was not accepted by me and Fire Rescue Victoria has
46 so far not confirmed that it authorised Banyule City Council to enter our property and neither
47 confirmed it had made a report as claimed by lawyer M Metcalf.
48 In my view Lawyer M Metcalf fabricated the involvement of Fire Rescue Victoria!
49 As the last aerial image was taken on 16 September 2023 which clearly was well after the
50 trespassing on 6 & 7 September 2023 then clearly it is nonsense to suggest that somehow this
51 could have been used to rely upon for the trespassing on 6 & 7 September 2023. As for the Fire
Page 16
1 Rescue Victoria alleged involvement in my view it would not rely upon Banyule City Council
2 lawyer to convey anything, as they have their own system. As such, another red card that there
3 was a fabrication.
4 As I kept writing exposing this nonsense so why not try to use another avenue such as allegedly
5 Section 14, 135 and 137 of the Planning & Environment Act 1987? Well that rot isn’t
6 acceptable either.
7 To my wife’s understanding the residence and the garage were built about 55 years ago at 107
8 Graham Road, Viewbank!
9
10
Page 17
1 As for “I look forwarded to your cooperation in this matter” it seems to me for a legal documents
2 the wording “forwarded” ought to be “forward”.
3
4 As for “please, don’t hesitate to contact me directly via the below” well there are no contact
5 details.
6 And the purported notice has no signature on it. Anyone can issue such purported notice.
7
8 As for the wording
9
10
11 And the document dated:
12
13
14
15 It must be clear that where the purported service was on 29 November 2023 then this only leaves
16 1 clear day being midnight 29 November 2023 till midnight 30 November 2023 as both 29
17 November 2023 and 1 December 2023 cannot be counted. (one of the counting of days I
18 successfully used in the Colosimo case also)
19
20 As such, apart of the fact there was no “order’ existing, even if this hypothetically had exist the
21 purported notice would have been invalid and I would have been well entitled to execute a
22 citizen arrest to protect my wife against this ongoing terrorism that places my wife’s life in
23 jeopardy!
24
25 The legislation refers to “Order prohibiting the use or development of land under
26 this Act and the Building Act 1993 for period of time”, and no order prohibiting, at
27 least to my knowledge exist.
28
29 At 131(1):
30 QUOTE
31 131 Order prohibiting the use or development of land for period of time
32 (1) The Governor in Council, by Order published in the Government Gazette, may
33 declare any one or more of the following—
34 (a) that land must not be developed or continue to be developed;
Page 18
1 (b) that land must not be developed or continue to be developed, except as

2 specified in the Order;
3 (c) that land must not be used, except as specified in the Order.
4 END QUOTE
5
6 At 131(2):
7 QUOTE
8 An Order may only be made under subsection (1) if a person has been found guilty of an
9 offence under section 126(1), (2) or (3) in relation to the unlawful demolition of a heritage
10 building, or part of a heritage building, on the land that is to be the subject of the Order.
11 END QUOTE
12
13 To my knowledge no order as such could exist as no court found either my wife and/or myself
14 “guilty” of any violations.
15
16 QUOTE
17 S. 134 substituted by No. 86/1989 s. 19(1).
18 134 What must be done before entry?
19 (1) Before entering any land an authorised person must—
20 (a) get the consent of the occupier; or
21 (b) give two clear days' notice to any occupier; or
22 (c) obtain a warrant in accordance with this section.
23 (2) An authorised person may apply to the Magistrates' Court for a warrant to
24 enter land.
25 END QUOTE
26
27 This part 134 makes it very clear (in regard of any Order in existence -which isn’t) that “get the
28 consent of the occupier” and this never eventuated on 6, 7 and 29 November 2023.
29 The problem with Banyule City Council is that first of all no application to build is subject to
30 any “order” and therefore Section 134 doesn’t apply. Neither could any “warrant” be applied for
31 as there is no “order” to rely upon and as such any purported “warrant” would be without legal
32 validity!
33 The same with the 2 two clear days of notice:
34 Here we had Banyule City Council officers trespassing and causing damage to items on our
35 property without having even requested to be allowed to enter the property and in violation of
36 the sign ENTRY PROHIBITED. Going around to trespass upon neighbouring property to climb
37 over the boot of a motor vehicle to gain access and in the process cause damages clearly is not
38 lawful and amounts to conspiracy to trespass where it involves more than 1 person, as was on 29
39 November 2023 involving Angela O’Brien and the male person who was there also.
40
41 Section 133(4)
42 QUOTE
43 (4) The provisions of the Magistrates' Court Act 1989 relating to application for,
44 and issue and execution of, search warrants apply with any necessary modifications to
45 warrants under this section.
46 END QUOTE
47
48 As to Section 137:
49 QUOTE
50 137 Offence to obstruct
51 Any person who without lawful excuse obstructs an authorised person or a police officer in
52 taking any action which is authorised under this Division is guilty of an offence.

Page 19
1 Penalty: 60 penalty units.

2 END QUOTE
3
4 It must be clear that the warrant application is limited to this section regarding an “order” and as
5 there is no such “order’ outstanding and the original “order” that existed about 50+ years ago
6 was ended the moment the building of the residence and garage were approved then the usage of
7 Section 134, 135 and 137 all are fatal to Banyule City Council political persecution.
8
9 In the Francis James Colosimo case there the local council had issued a prohibition and then
10 subsequently withdrew it against a “shed’ that had been built. Mr Colosimo was subject to
11 numerous litigations and also subsequently placed under Administration (evidence of 2 medical
12 expert witnesses) and also subjected to at least 6 CONTEMPT OF COURT proceedings. Mr
13 Francis James Colosimo then decided to get rid of his lawyers, and so the so called special lawyer
14 expert in council matters were facing me representing Mr Francis James Colosimo. First I pursued
15 that the appeal against the Order of Administration be held after I could represent Mr Francis James
16 Colosimo before Her Honour Harbison J regarding the alleged CONTEMPT OF COURT
17 conviction the medical expert witnesses relied upon to recommend Orders for Adminsitr5ation. I
18 submitted to the Court that where the council had withdrawn their order against Mr Francis James
19 Colosimo then this legally means that the shed was lawfully build. Further, that because the shed
20 (previously registered as a shed by a university) was wrongly held by VCAT to be a seco0ndary
21 residence, as by the council own lawyers it needed to have a closet toilet and sink and water supply
22 which did not exist in the shed. VCAT claiming that because the shed had large windows and a flat
23 roof didn’t make it a secondary residence. The VCAT application was made mere days after the
24 council had withdrawn the order and as such the litigation had no legal basis. Also, that as Her
25 Honour admitted there was no conviction of CONTEMPT OF COURT then the 2 medical expert
26 witnesses clearly based their findings (evidence) having been misled by the lawyer for the office of
27 the public prosecution and were therefore no proper reliable evidence at all. As I submitted no one
28 in the world could possible comply with an order to remove a secondary residence that didn’t exist,
29 etc. Her Honour also accepted my submission that a party filing a CONTEMPT OF COURT
30 application as the opposing council; lawyers had done then the application becomes the property of
31 the court and cannot be withdrawn by the party that filed it. Her Honour Harbison accepted my
32 many submissions and that was the end of the CONTEMPT OF COURT matter. Subsequently the
33 appeal against the Order of Administration was also upheld.
34
35 I understand that becklegal professes to be expert lawyers in council litigation and yet in my
36 view are more amateurs and lacking any relevant competence.
37
38 When one refers to a particular section such as 134, 135 and 137 then one must consider in
39 relation to which they are stating which means “Order prohibiting the use or
40 development of land under this Act and the Building Act 1993 for period
41 of time”, and no order prohibiting, at least to my knowledge exist.
42 Even if an order had existed at the time of building the residence and garage the order would
43 have been completed long ago when the council (which ever then was applicable) approved the
44 building of the residence and garage. Which, I understand was more than 50 years ago!
45
46 QUOTE
47 Division 3—Powers of entry
48 133 Powers of entry
49 The following persons are authorised to enter any land at any reasonable time to carry out
50 and enforce this Act, the regulations, a planning scheme, a permit condition, an
51 enforcement order or an agreement under section 173 or, if the person has a reasonable
52 suspicion, to find out whether any of them has been or is being contravened—
53 END QUOTE
Page 20
1
2 Here we go again. Firstly there are no orders outstanding but even if it were (not conceding there
3 are any orders) then a “reasonable suspicion” in relation to a violation of an “order” would not
4 mean to trespass first to try to gain any purported knowledge as to try to use this unlawfully
5 obtained alleged knowledge to claim “a reasonable suspicion”. Even if so to say I had 2 dozen
6 human corpses in the backyard and Banyule City Council staff had trespassed upon the property
7 and allegedly become aware of the rotting corpses then it still couldn’t be used as any evidence.
8
9 http://www.austlii.edu.au/au/legis/vic/consol_act/paea1987254/
10 PLANNING AND ENVIRONMENT ACT 1987 - AustLII
11 Division 1--Exhibition and notice of amendment · 17 Copies of amendment to be given to
12 certain persons · 18 Availability of amendment · 19 What notice of an ...
13 QUOTE
14 Division 2A—Order prohibiting the use or development of land under this Act
15 and the Building Act 1993 for period of time
16
17 New s. 131 inserted by No. 12/2021 s. 6.
18 131 Order prohibiting the use or development of land for period of time
20 declare any one or more of the following—
21 (a) that land must not be developed or continue to be developed;
22 (b) that land must not be developed or continue to be developed, except as
23 specified in the Order;
24 (c) that land must not be used, except as specified in the Order.
25 (2) An Order may only be made under subsection (1) if a person has been found guilty
26 of an offence under section 126(1), (2) or (3) in relation to the unlawful demolition
27 of a heritage building, or part of a heritage building, on the land that is to be the
28 subject of the Order.
29 (3) An Order under subsection (1)—
30 (a) must specify the period of time for which the Order has effect; and
31 (b) must not be made more than once in relation to the same conduct.
33 amend an Order under subsection (1).
34
35
36 (5) An amendment to an Order may extend the period of time for which the Order has
37 effect, but the total period of time for which the Order has effect must not exceed
38 10 years.
39 New s. 132 inserted by No. 12/2021 s. 6.
40 132 Effect of Order
41 (1) While an Order under section 131 is in effect—
42 (a) a permit that was granted under this Act before the Order took effect in
43 relation to the land the subject of the Order is of no force or effect; and
44 (b) a building permit that was issued before the Order took effect in relation to
45 the land the subject of the Order is of no force or effect; and
46 (c) a responsible authority must refuse to grant a permit under this Act in relation
47 to the land the subject of the Order; and
48 (d) a relevant building surveyor must refuse a building permit in relation to the
49 land the subject of the Order.

Page 21
1 (2) Subsection (1)(a) and (c) do not apply in relation to a permit or the grant of a
2 permit under this Act for a use or development that is specified in the Order under
3 section 131(1)(b) or (c) as an exception.
4 (3) Subsection (1)(b) and (d) do not apply in relation to a building permit or the issue
5 of a building permit for building work in respect of a development that is specified
6 in the Order under section 131(1)(b) as an exception.
7 (4) A permit granted in contravention of subsection (1)(c) is invalid and of no force or
8 effect.
9 (5) A building permit issued in contravention of subsection (1)(d) is invalid and of no
10 force or effect.
11 S. 132A inserted by No. 12/2021 s. 6.
12 132A Nothing in Order prevents emergency order
13 Nothing in an Order under section 131 prevents the making or otherwise affects the operation of
14 an emergency order under Division 1 of Part 8 of the Building Act 1993.
15 Division 3—Powers of entry
16 133 Powers of entry
17 The following persons are authorised to enter any land at any reasonable time to carry out and
18 enforce this Act, the regulations, a planning scheme, a permit condition, an enforcement order or
19 an agreement under section 173 or, if the person has a reasonable suspicion, to find out whether
20 any of them has been or is being contravened—
21 S. 133(a) amended by No. 35/1995 s. 11(1)(c).
22 (a) any authorised officer of the Department;
23
24
25 (b) any authorised officer of the responsible authority;
26 (c) any other person whom the Minister authorises to assist an authorised officer
27 of the Ministry or authority.
28 S. 134 substituted by No. 86/1989 s. 19(1).
29 134 What must be done before entry?
30 (1) Before entering any land an authorised person must—
31 (a) get the consent of the occupier; or
32 (b) give two clear days' notice to any occupier; or
33 (c) obtain a warrant in accordance with this section.
34 (2) An authorised person may apply to the Magistrates' Court for a warrant to enter
35 land.
36 (3) The warrant is to be directed to an authorised person named in the warrant and
37 authorises that person to enter the land named or described in the warrant without
38 notice to the occupier, and to do the things authorised to be done by sections 133
39 and 135.
40 (4) The provisions of the Magistrates' Court Act 1989 relating to application for, and
41 issue and execution of, search warrants apply with any necessary modifications to
42 warrants under this section.
43 135 Powers of authorised persons who enter land
44 On entering any land, an authorised person may take any action that is necessary to find out if
45 any person has contravened the Act, the regulations, a planning scheme, a permit condition, an
46 enforcement order or an agreement under section 173 including—
47 (a) taking photographs or measurements; and
48 (b) making sketches or recordings; and
49 (c) taking and removing samples.
50 S. 136 amended by Nos 46/1998 s. 7(Sch. 1), 37/2014 s. 10(Sch. item 124.2).
51 136 Police to assist authorised persons
Page 22
1 All police officers are required to assist an authorised officer of a responsible authority, at the
2 request of that authorised officer in the execution of his or her powers under section 133 to enter
3 any land.
4 S. 137 amended by Nos 28/2000 s. 10(4), 37/2014 s. 10(Sch. item 124.3).
5 137 Offence to obstruct
6 Any person who without lawful excuse obstructs an authorised person or a police officer in
7 taking any action which is authorised under this Division is guilty of an offence.
8 Penalty: 60 penalty units.
9 Note to s. 137 inserted by No. 21/2013 s. 18(4).
10 Note
11 Section 128 applies to an offence against this section.
12
13 S. 138 amended by No. 37/2014 s. 10(Sch. item 124.3).
14 138 No legal proceedings against authorised persons
15 A person is not entitled to bring an action against an authorised person or a police officer or the
16 Crown or the employer of an authorised person in respect of any entry on land or other action
17 done or in good faith purportedly done in the course of an investigation or the performance of
18 any other duty under this Division.
19 END QUOTE
20
21
22
23 I wrote previously about the disability mobile scooter side mirror having been smashed and no
24 the canvas around it has been considerable damaged. Having two people climbing over a
25 fence/boot of a car then they are forcing themselves upon canvas that then result in damages.
26
27 And by having also been on the about 6 feet folder aluminium disability ramp in excess of the
28 permitted weight then they also have caused harm towards it.
29
30 When my wife uses the ramp I stand clear from the ramp, even if assisting her, by standing next
31 to the ramp as I explained at the time to my wife my weight would exceed the permitted
32 maximum weight. Well it seems to me Banyule City Council staff seems to be ill trained in
33 particularly also how to not trespass on people’s property. After all what legal excuse may be

Page 23
1 devised to claim that the trespass upon 105 Graham Road Viewbank (at least on 4 occasions)
2 was lawfully permitted. Perhaps claiming the Fire Rescue Victoria made a report each time?
3
4 QUOTE Re: D23/321260: see attachment 20231129-Mr G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B. to Lawyers Molly Metcalf,
5 becklegal-Supplement 3
6 Re: D23/321260: see attachment 20231129-Mr G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B. to Lawyers
7 Molly Metcalf, becklegal-Supplement 3
8
9 Mr Gerrit H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B.
10 From:
11 To:
12 Cc:,
13 Fri, 1 Dec at 4:22 pm
14 Jan,
15
16 I do not know to what extend you may investigate matters but would hold there needs to be
17 an overall investigation as this has to stop.
18
19 I intend to write to lawyer M Metcalf (becklegal) later today to set out certain legal issues
20 and why the purported notice was invalid for a number of reasons.
21
22 I have now also locked the security door to the gazebo to prevent further trespassing.
23
24 Obviously, where there was so to say no show at about 1 pm today despite the alleged
25 notice then why didn't Banyule City Council not provide notification that it abandoned this
26 planned trespassing at 1 pm, as my wife was in fear that if I were to go out to collect her
27 medical scripts from a chemist and/or collect parcels regarding I ordered regarding my
28 wife's disabilities and security then they may terrorize her being alone?
29
30
31
32
33
34 I will also set out further damage caused by Angela O'Brien and the male accomplice by
35 their trespassing on Wednesday 29 November 2023. While Angela O'Brien gave me the
36 understanding that they climbed over the side fence (between property 105 and 107
37 Graham Road Viewbank, it seems to me they would have climbed over the boot of the
38 Mitsubishi as that is much lower than the fence. Further, as Angela O'Brien and the male
39 accomplish walked over the 6 feet (about 1.8 meter) portable folder wheelchair ramp above
40 the weight that is permitted for this ramp now may be unusable also. They had absolutely
41 no right to enter the property let alone cause any damage.
42
43 I on Thursday 30 November 2023 requested the Victoria Police to obtain an
44 intervention/restraining order against Banyule City Council and its staff and anyone acting
45 for and on behalf of it, however I had so far no response what, if anything eventuated. I did
46 make clear that to protect my wife I may perform a citizen arrest upon anyone trespassing
47 and by this inflict harm upon my wife.
48
49 I request you to not refer in your correspondence (as you did see below) about such
50 statement regarding Aboriginal matters as I previously wrote to Banyule City Council that
51 this political conduct should not be engaged in.

Page 24
1
2 For the record I use my email inspector_rikati@yahoo.com.au to send out email mainly
3 because my private email system fails at times to continue the attachment to be sent out,
4 however the correct email address to respond to is admin@inspector-rikat.com, this to
5 avoid responses to be lost in other emails clogging the yahoo email system.
6
7 I look forwards to you setting out to me what your investigation will be about.
8
9 Gerrit
10
11 Constitutionalist & Consultant
12
13 MAY JUSTICE ALWAYS PREVAIL®
14 Mr. G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B., GUARDIAN
15 (OFFICE-OF-THE-GUARDIAN)
16 107 Graham Road, Viewbank, 3084, Victoria, Australia
17 Ph (International) 61394577209
18 .
19 Email; inspector_rikati@yahoo.com.au
20
21 The content of this email and any attachments are provided WITHOUT PREJUDICE,
22 unless specifically otherwise stated.
23
24 If you find any typing/grammatical errors then I know you read it, all you now need to do
25 is to consider the content appropriately!
26
27 A FOOL IS A PERSON WHO DOESN'T ASK THE QUESTION BECAUSE OF BEING
28 CONCERNED TO BE LABELLED A FOOL.
29
30
31
32 On Friday, 1 December 2023 at 02:13:49 pm AEDT, Jan Richardson
33 <jan.richardson@banyule.vic.gov.au> wrote:
34
35
36 Workflow Notes
37 Document sent for Action to:
38 1. Team Tray Council Governance Liaison Officers
39
40 Document sent for FYI to:
41
42 Notes:
43
44 Jan Richardson
45 Cemetery Administration and Support Officer
46
47 Banyule City Council
48 T 94904321
49 @BanyuleCouncil | Facebook | Instagram | LinkedIn
50
51
Page 25
Banyule City Council is proud to acknowledge the Wurundjeri Woi-wurrung people as

Traditional Custodians of the land and we pay respect to all Aboriginal and Torres
Strait Islander Elders, past, present and emerging, who have resided in the area and have
been an integral part of the region’s history.
Banyule City Council endorses the Uluru Statement from the Heart in full and accepts the
invitation to walk with First Nations peoples, to a better future for us all.
Our community is made up of diverse cultures, beliefs, abilities, bodies, sexualities, ages
and genders.
We are committed to access, equity, participation and rights for everyone; principles
which empower, foster harmony and increase the wellbeing of an inclusive community.
1
2 From: Mr Gerrit H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B. <inspector_rikati@yahoo.com.au>
3 Sent: Wednesday, 29 November 2023 1:32 PM
4 To: mmetcalf@becklegal.com.au
5 Cc: Gerrit Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B. <admin@inspector-rikati.com>
6 Subject: see attachment 20231129-Mr G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B. to Lawyers Molly
7 Metcalf, becklegal-Supplement 3
8
9 Molly Metcalf Lawyer, becklegal (Australia, Victoria date) 29-
10 11-2023
11
12 Cc: Cr Alison Champion alison.champion@banyule.vic.gov.au
13 Cr Fiona Mitsinikos fiona.mitsdinikos@banyule.vic.gov.au
14 Cr Elizabeth Nealy elizabeth.nealy@banyule.vic.gov.au
15 Cr Mark Di Pasquate mark.dipasquale@banyule.vic.gov.au
16 Cr Alida McKern alida.mckern@banyule.vic.gov.au
17 Cr Peter Dimarelos peter.demarelos@banyule.vic.gov.au
18 Cr Rick Garotti rick.garotti@banyule.vic.gov.au
19 Cr Tom Melican tom.melican@banyule.vic.gov.au
20 Cr Peter Casteldo peter.castaldo@banyule.vic.gov.au
21 Mr RomanWojtkowski enquiries@banyule.vic.gov.au
22 Officer Janet Redgrave Team Leader Development
23 Planning enquiries@banyule.vic.gov.au
24 Banyule City Council enquiries@banyule.vic.gov.au
25
26 Re: 20231129-Mr G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B. to Molly Metcalf lawyer, becklegal-
27 Supplement 3
28
29 NOT RESTRICTED FOR PUBLICATION
30 COMPLAINT-Supplement 3
31 Madam,
32
33
34 My wife’s heart rate went from 72 to 121 finding Banyule City Council bashing at the
35 door in violation of ENTRY PROHIBITED signage, resulting my wife now in bed
36 trying to recover from the shock. Let the rule of law prevail!
37 https://www.scribd.com/document/688175535/20231129-Mr-G-H-Schorel-Hlavka-O-W-
38 B-to-Lawyers-Molly-Metcalf-Becklegal-Supplement-3
39
Page 26
1
2 see attachment
3
4 20231129-Mr G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B. to Lawyers Molly Metcalf, becklegal-
5 Supplement 3
6
7 Constitutionalist & Consultant
8
10 Mr. G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B., GUARDIAN
11 (OFFICE-OF-THE-GUARDIAN)
12 107 Graham Road, Viewbank, 3084, Victoria, Australia
13 Ph (International) 61394577209
14 .
15 Email; inspector_rikati@yahoo.com.au
16
17 The content of this email and any attachments are provided WITHOUT PREJUDICE,
18 unless specifically otherwise stated.
19
20 If you find any typing/grammatical errors then I know you read it, all you now need to do
21 is to consider the content appropriately!
22
23 A FOOL IS A PERSON WHO DOESN'T ASK THE QUESTION BECAUSE OF BEING
24 CONCERNED TO BE LABELLED A FOOL.
25 END QUOTE Re: D23/321260: see attachment 20231129-Mr G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B. to Lawyers Molly Metcalf,
26 becklegal-Supplement 3
27
28 I wrote numerous pages and while lawyer M Metcalf may charge for reading pages, etc, besides
29 those she didn’t received that were forwarded to Banyule City Council, safe to say they were in
30 the hundreds in totality. But no one seemed to care not even lawyer M Metcalf of becklegal and
31 I intend to pursue a complaint with the Legal Service Commission about this also.
32
33 If lawyer M Metcalf is incompetent then that is her problem but shouldn’t result in grossly
34 incompetence conduct against my wife and I and certainly placing her safety, health and
35 wellbeing at risk.
36 Today no notification by Banyule City Council or lawyer M Metcalf that no one would be
37 attending on Friday 1 December 2023, which I view would have been no more but common
38 decency in the circumstances. Now I had my wife fearful that if I were to go to the chemist for
39 obtaining her medication I could be arrested or they may harm her further in my absenteeism.
40 Banyule City Council staff at least 4 times entered a gazebo, to which they had absolutely no
41 legal right to do so, I now have locked the security door at the gazebo as I am left not to enable
42 such trespassing again.
43
44 Over the about last 3 months I had to spend considerable time to write to Banyule City Council,
45 its councillors, etc, as well as to lawyer M Metcalf of becklegal and without any proper resolve.
46 Perhaps the scheming by Banyule City Council and others a may not as yet have stopped and
47 they may seek to fabricate other issues, but let me make it very clear, that any purported
48 knowledge cannot be used where it was the product of criminal conduct. If becklegal was
49 involved to fabricate allegations involving Fire Rescue Victoria, the usage of Section 32 of the
50 act and the purported notice regarding Section 134, 135 and 137 of the Planning & Environment
51 Act 1987 then one may wonder what gross incompetence she has and why the alleged notice did

Page 27
1 not stipulate that it related to “Order prohibiting the use or development of land
2 under this Act and the Building Act 1993 for period of time”. As such, I view it
3 was a gross deceptive conduct in the overall.
4 Perhaps, in the end Banyule City Council would have done better to make an offer acceptable to
5 my wife and myself to purchase the property (as I offered earlier) so as to avoid any further
6 problems, then to use criminal conduct. Now, Banyule City Council and its legal advisors as well
7 as those involved by their conduct and/or failing to act when they should have may just discover
8 this could become a very expensive issue to each and every one of them involved. Where indeed
9 were the councillors, who were all provided with copies forwarded to Banyule City Council by
10 specifically include their email addresses? They seem all to have been blatantly ignorant to step
11 up and demand that Banyule City Council staff act lawfully, etc. This, as in regard of TORT the
12 court would likely consider the extensive writing I provided to make clear that the trespassing
13 and political persecution was unacceptable and particularly also the harm upon my wife Olga,
14 where it was clear she suffered from heart failure. There is a lot more to it all but for the moment
15 Banyule City Council and all of them employed and/or as councillors and their legal
16 representatives better avoid any further problems/complications as you all may just have learned
17 a lesson that I am not one resident who can be terrorise without any legal consequences! What is
18 the use of having councillors when the blatantly disregard to even consider what I complained
19 about and left my wife at serious risk? What kind of CEO is running Banyule City Council
20 where my wife’s life was placed in jeopardy uncalled for? I mused to manage factories and
21 those employed with the company knew that whenever they made a complaint I always would
22 immediately investigate it extensively, as I held that was their right. In my view besides the
23 above stated there are numerous other issues that needs to be addressed by it appears to me
24 Banyule City Council management is grossly incompetent to do so appropriately.
25
26 I filed my COMPLAINT with the police and you all may face the legal consequences of this
27 also!
28
29
30
31 We need to return to the organics and legal principles embed in of our federal constitution!
32
33 This correspondence is not intended and neither must be perceived to state all issues/details.
34
35 Awaiting your response, G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B. (Gerrit)

38 END QUOTE 20231201-Mr G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B. to Molly Metcalf lawyer, becklegal-Supplement 5
39
40 Let us look at it that allegedly Banyule City council claims that my wife and I are running some
41 business “store” but despite that they already trespassed on 6 September 2023, 7 September 20-
Page 28
1 23 and 29 September 2023 and other days over some 6 years were STALKING our property
2 they never did actually present any evidence we have a “store” let alone run a business from a
3 “store”.
4
5 It might be asked if there is nothing to hide then why have gates. Well, anyone who considers the
6 crime way going on in Victoria would be well aware that it is not about having something to hide
7 but about avoiding criminals to rob the property. And let us be honest politicians, judges,
8 lawyers, police, etc, all are walking around with keys, including car keys if they use a car and
9 well why do they lock anything if there is no crime wave occurring? Have they got something to
10 hide?
11
12 https://www.wnd.com/2023/12/15-year-old-gang-raped-9-men-no-prison-shocking-
13 reason/?utm_source=Email&utm_medium=wnd-
14 breaking&utm_campaign=breaking&utm_content=breaking&ats_es=a706e995ec590e948
15 0340416ca68a7e0&ats_ess=3b96bb1aa28cc0b6fa73dbed2f634ed3b3de7f721adf5b5f2722b
16 51f34f5306 1
17 15-year-old gang-raped by 9 men, but no prison for shocking reason
18 'A means of releasing frustration and anger' stemming from their 'migration experiences'
19 QUOTE
20 A psychiatrist stunningly has claimed that the nine men who gang-raped a 15-year-old girl
21 were just releasing "frustration and anger" that they felt over their "migration experiences
22 and socio-cultural homelessness."
23 END QUOTE
24
25 The comment I posted:
26
27 I just wonder if those men gang raped this psychiatrist if she still would make the same
28 claims? What this poor girl went through and for the rest of her life. It seems to me that
29 this psychiatrist ought to be deregistered for her gross incompetence.
30
31 High court unanimously ruled indefinite detention was unlawful while backing preventive
32 regime
33 QUOTE
34 The high court has revealed its reasons for striking down indefinite immigration detention
35 while suggesting a preventive detention regime could be legislated to re-detain non-
36 citizens convicted of serious crimes.
37 On Tuesday, the court published its legal reasons in the case of NZYQ, revealing all seven
38 justices decided earlier this month to overturn the precedent case of Al-Kateb which has
39 underpinned Australia’s system of mandatory immigration detention since 2004.
40 END QUOTE
41
42 Let us consider what the Framers of the Constitution stated:
43
44 Hansard 3-3-1898 Constitution Convention Debates
45 QUOTE
46 Sir JOHN FORREST.-What is a citizen? A British subject?
47 Mr. WISE.-I presume so.
48 Sir JOHN FORREST.-They could not take away the rights of British subjects.
49 Mr. WISE.-I do not think so. I beg to move- That the words "each state" be omitted, with the view of
50 inserting the words "the Commonwealth."
51 I apprehend the Commonwealth must have complete power to grant or refuse citizenship to any citizen
52 within its borders. I think my answer to Sir John Forrest was given a little too hastily when I said that every
53 citizen of the British Empire must be a citizen of the Commonwealth. The Commonwealth will have power

Page 29
1 to determine who is a citizen. I do not think Dr. Quick's amendment is necessary. If we do not put in a
2 definition of citizenship every state will have inherent power to decide who is a citizen. That was the
3 decision of the Privy Council in Ah Toy's case.
4 Sir JOHN FORREST.-He was an alien.
5 Mr. WISE.-The Privy Council decided that the Executive of any colony had an inherent right to
6 determine who should have the rights of citizenship within its borders.
7 Mr. KINGSTON.-That it had the right of keeping him out.
8 END QUOTE
9 Meaning that where the commonwealth gives a person the opportunity to leave but the person
10 fails to do so then it is not any form of “indefinite immigration detention” pending the person to
11 leave is not a real indefinite detention. After all courts at times order the imprisonment of a
12 person pending the person to comply with relevant court orders and this is generally referred to
13 as holding the keys to once own cell door.
14 Therefore, there is no indefinite detention because the person can leave at any time the country.
15 If the person fails to do so then he is the victim of his own choice.
16
17 What we now seem to have is that courts, police, etc, are all in violation of the Commonwealth
18 of Australia Constitution Act 1900 (UK) protecting the miss-assumed rights of criminals rather
19 than to protect Australians.
20
21 It is the High Court of Australia that in my view has become WOKE and act treasonous in
22 exceeding its judicial powers and by this placing Australians at risk. As one of those ordered to
23 be released I understand now went raping an Australian.
24
25 Hansard 10-3-1891 Constitution Convention Debates (Official Record of the Debates of the National
26 Australasian Convention)
27 QUOTE Mr. DIBBS:
28 The question of creating a standing army is one which, to my mind, is almost more
29 repulsive than the question of readjustment of territorial boundaries. It means the
30 existence in our midst of a certain number of idle men-men sharpening their knives
31 and their swords for the first fitting opportunity of fleshing them on the people of
32 their own country, because we have no other enemies. We, in Australia-federated
33 Australia, I may take it, because the matter is one which applies to the whole-have no
34 enemies within our borders; we have no Indians to dispute with us the possession of the
35 soil; we have no powerful Maori race, to fight, as was once the case in New Zealand, for
36 the territory the right to which belonged to the Maoris themselves. We have no enemies
37 within, and the only thing we have to fear is the possibility of any assault on the
38 mother country by her enemies from without, unless indeed the creation of a standing
39 army proves a menace to the people of Australia by the existence of an armed force
40 for unlawful purposes. This question of the creation of a military force is one of the blots
41 upon these resolutions. We want no military force within New South Wales. All we want
42 to do is to make every man who is either a native of the soil, or one of ourselves by
43 reason of his taking up his residence amongst us, prepare to resist possible invasion
44 from without. Who are our enemies? Who are our enemies but the enemies of England,
45 and they, so long as we remain under the Crown, will be dealt with by an outer
46 barrier, an outer bulwark in the defence of Australia, in the shape of the navy of Old
47 England. But we have no enemies within, and there is no necessity to fasten the curse of a
48 standing army upon us. As was pointed out by the hon. member, Sir George Grey,
49 yesterday, in his interesting speech, we have no necessity to keep a large standing army at
50 a large cost to the people of the country, [start page 185] when we have no enemies with
51 whom they will have to fight. Our own police are quite sufficient for the preservation
52 of order within.
53 END QUOTE
Page 30
1
2 QUOTE
3 Our own police are quite sufficient for the preservation of order within.
4 END QUOTE
5
6 Well tell the Victoria Police for this instead of them terrorising Victorians!
7
8 Reality seems to me we have cowards and traitors in the police force failing to do their duties
9 and align with politicians such as using rubber bullet upon parents holding their small children
10 when exercising their constitutional rights to protest as the shrine of Remembrance.
11
12 In my view Mayor Cr Tom Melican ought to have called for a STATUS QUO and allow Jan
13 Richardson and others to properly investigate matters. I have no doubt that it would have been
14 established that there was not a shred of evidence that my wife and I were having a “store” and
15 so on that alone Banyule City Council had no legal basis to justify the numerous trespassing,
16 terrorism, STALKING, vandalism, etc.
17 Obviously Banyule City Council might now perhaps realising that it has nothing to simply
18 continue it all just in case they somehow might just find something they can use for whatever. It
19 I view means the malicious intent to abuse any powers no matter how unlawful as to try to allege
20 something it can use against us.
21
22 It should be understood that Banyule City Council could have informed me that the 29
23 November 2023 purported notice regarding 8 December 2023 was is withdrawn, pending an
24 investigation, but it didn’t and as result my wife’s heart rate went from about 80 to 111 & 113.
25 Well, I just received alarm system which I intend to install and any person entering the property
26 without my consent will risk to be subjected to a CITIZEN ARREST as obviously the Victorian
27 Police are failing in their duties to uphold the rule of law.
28 Again:
29 QUOTE
30 All we want to do is to make every man who is either a native of the soil, or one of
31 ourselves by reason of his taking up his residence amongst us, prepare to resist
32 possible invasion from without.
33 END QUOTE
34
35 If the Victoria Police desires to be cowards or traitors to do the dirty work for foreign enemies
36 such as the New World Order instead of protecting Victorians then well I am entitled to take
37 such appropriate action as I deem fit and appropriate in the circumstances, even to do an
38 CITIZEN ARREST upon any Victoria Police officer who was to trespass and/or provide
39 assistance to anyone to tress pass upon our property. Anyone placing my wife’s life in jeopardy,
40 including anyone assisting in this criminal activity I view for this can be lawfully placed under a
41 CITIZEN ARREST!
42 The onus is upon the Victoria Police to avoid any conflicts by preventing Banyule City
43 Council to unlawfully continue its criminal conduct!
44
45 We need to return to the organics and legal principles embed in of our federal constitution!
46
47 This correspondence is not intended and neither must be perceived to state all issues/details.
48 Awaiting your response, G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B. (Gerrit)


20231205-Mr G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B. To Victoria Police at Heidelberg - COMPLAINT-Supplement 3

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

20231205-Mr G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B. To Victoria Police at Heidelberg - COMPLAINT-Supplement 3

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Page 1

6-12-2023 Page 2 © Mr G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B.

6-12-2023 Page 4 © Mr G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B.

6-12-2023 Page 7 © Mr G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B.

6-12-2023 Page 10 © Mr G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B.

58 I didn't to my knowledge/recollection refer to any Mr Carl Williams matter as a complaint in

6-12-2023 Page 12 © Mr G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B.

6-12-2023 Page 13 © Mr G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B.

21 I suspect that the Ethical Standards Department/Independent Broad-Based Anti-Corruption

28 As His Honour Walsh J in 1985 commented about my tactics of cross-examination of witnesses

37 MAY JUSTICE ALWAYS PREVAIL ®

38 (Our name is our motto!)

1 (b) that land must not be developed or continue to be developed, except as

6-12-2023 Page 18 © Mr G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B.

1 Penalty: 60 penalty units.

6-12-2023 Page 20 © Mr G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B.

6-12-2023 Page 22 © Mr G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B.

6-12-2023 Page 23 © Mr G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B.

Banyule City Council is proud to acknowledge the Wurundjeri Woi-wurrung people as

6-12-2023 Page 26 © Mr G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B.

36 MAY JUSTICE ALWAYS PREVAIL®

6-12-2023 Page 28 © Mr G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B.

49 MAY JUSTICE ALWAYS PREVAIL®

You might also like