Page 1

1
2
3 Molly Metcalf Lawyer, becklegal (Australia, Victoria date) 7-12-2023
4 mmetcalf@becklegal.com.au
5
6 Cc: Cr Alison Champion alison.champion@banyule.vic.gov.au
7 Cr Fiona Mitsinikos fiona.mitsdinikos@banyule.vic.gov.au
8 Cr Elizabeth Nealy elizabeth.nealy@banyule.vic.gov.au
9 Cr Mark Di Pasquate mark.dipasquale@banyule.vic.gov.au
10 Cr Alida McKern alida.mckern@banyule.vic.gov.au
11 Cr Peter Dimarelos peter.demarelos@banyule.vic.gov.au
12 Cr Rick Garotti rick.garotti@banyule.vic.gov.au
13 Cr Tom Melican tom.melican@banyule.vic.gov.au
14 Cr Peter Casteldo peter.castaldo@banyule.vic.gov.au
15 Mr RomanWojtkowski enquiries@banyule.vic.gov.au
16 Jan Richarson enquiries@banyule.vic.gov.au
17 Officer Janet Redgrave Team Leader Development Planning enquiries@banyule.vic.gov.au
18 Banyule City Council enquiries@banyule.vic.gov.au
19
20 Re: 20231207-Mr G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B. to Molly Metcalf lawyer, becklegal-Supplement 7
21
22 NOT RESTRICTED FOR PUBLICATION
23 COMPLAINT-Supplement 7
24 Madam,

25 WARNING
26
27
VERY IMPORTANT
28 Olga, my 91-year-old wife, was advised by her GP that if there is a certain blood pressure
29 reading level I should call for an ambulance or rush her myself to a hospital. I did request the GP
30 to put it in writing and he did send me an email in that regard. Actually I save my wife’s life on
31 10 October 20219 when I rushed her to hospital and she ended up in ICU and spend 10 days in
32 hospital, where I held that waiting for an ambulance would be likely having my wife dying
33 before one would turn up, considering I took about 10 minutes no ambulance generally can
34 match, in particular where they are having to move from hospital to hospital seeking a vacant
35 bed!
36 Obviously, it seems to me your client Banyule City Council is determined to so to say continue
37 with its appetite and lust for terrorism to continue upon my wife and myself, and well if this
38 turns out to be fatal to my wife then you can be rest assured that I do have the GP email to prove

7-12-2023 Page 1 © Mr G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B.

INSPECTOR-RIKATI® about the BLACK HOLE in the CONSTITUTION-DVD
A 1st edition limited special numbered book on Data DVD ISBN 978-0-9803712-6-0
PLEASE NOTE: You may order books in the INSPECTOR-RIKATI® series by making a reservation, or E-mail
admin@inspector-rikati.com See also www.scribd.com/inspectorrikati
 Page 2

1 to court about the warning and my warning to you about this. Obviously, I do not need to
2 produce the warning to you but can do so if needed in a court of competent jurisdiction!
3
4 Your 25 October 2023 correspondence stated:
5 QUOTE
6 D. Fire Rescue Victoria 18.
7 We confirm that on 6 and 7 September 2023, Authorised Council Officers had
8 authorisation to inspect the Land pursuant to Section 32 of the Fire Rescue Victoria Act
9 1958 (the Act).
10 END QUOTE
11
12 Yet, you have as yet not produced any documentation to prove such authorisation, neither did the
13 Fire Rescue Victoria provide upon my request any such authorisation having been provided to
14 your client.
15 Indeed it also be interesting to discover what authority the Fire Rescue Victoria has to authorise
16 your client’s staff Angela O’Brien to trespass upon Olga’s Ford EU which was lawfully
17 registered and lawfully park! As I did provide images of the motor vehicle parked in front of our
18 property and there not being any signs(s) prohibiting parking or limiting parking, etc, then well
19 even if your client was now to put up signs and claim it is restricted it doesn’t apply backdated!
20
21 I did ask my neighbour who’s property was used by Angela O’Brien and the male associate if
22 she had given permission for Banyule City Council to enter the property they rent and to allow
23 by this for them to enter my property and she was in my view surprised that Banyule City
24 Council unbeknown to her had been on the property they rent to the exclusion of others, other
25 than the landlord and his/her agents. I did express that Banyule City Council seemed to claim
26 that Olga and I operate a store and well her comment as I understood it was that we never
27 seemed to have any visitors.
28
29 In my view Banyule City Council mayor Cr Tom Milican would do better to
30 immediately pursue a STATUS QUO to ensure that first proper internal investigation
31 is conducted to avoid further trespassing and other harm upon us.
32 You can download the document from:
33 https://www.scribd.com/document/689987969/20231206-Mr-G-H-Schorel-Hlavka-O-W-B-to-Banyule-City-
34 Council-Cr-Mayor-Tom-Melican-and-Ors-TRESPASS-Etc-Supplement-18
35
36 Remember I provided previous the following authority of 100 years ago?
37
38 https://constitutionwatch.com.au/fee-simple/ttps://constitutionwatch.com.au/fee-simple/
39 Commonwealth v New South Wales [1923] HCA 34 (1923) 33 CLR 1 (9 August 1923)
40 HIGH COURT OF AUSTRALIA
41 KNOX C.J., ISAACS, HIGGINS, GAVAN DUFFY AND STARKE JJ.
42 THE COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA PLAINTIFF against
43 THE STATE OF NEW SOUTH WALES AND ANOTHER DEFENDANTS
44 1920-1923: SYDNEY, Dec. 1-3, 1920; Mar. 21-29, 1922; Aug. 9, 1923 33 CLR 1
45 Extracts from Commonwealth Law Reports Volume 33 / 33 CLR 1:- (1920) 33 CLR 1 at 42
46 QUOTE
47 “It confers, and since the beginning of legal history it always has conferred, the lawful
48 right to exercise over, upon, and in respect to, the land, every act of ownership which
49 can enter into the imagination, including the right to commit unlimited waste; and,
50 for all practical purposes of ownership, it differs from the absolute dominion of a
51 chattel, in nothing except the physical indestructibility of its subject.”
52 “Besides these rights of ownership, a fee simple at the present day confers an absolute
53 right, both of alienation inter vivos and of devise by will.”
54 END QUOTE
55 And
7-12-2023 Page 2 © Mr G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B.
INSPECTOR-RIKATI® about the BLACK HOLE in the CONSTITUTION-DVD
A 1st edition limited special numbered book on Data DVD ISBN 978-0-9803712-6-0
PLEASE NOTE: You may order books in the INSPECTOR-RIKATI® series by making a reservation, or E-mail
admin@inspector-rikati.com See also www.scribd.com/inspectorrikati
 Page 3

1 QUOTE
2 ISAACS J. In Challis's Real Property, 3rd ed., p. 218,
3 it is stated with perfect accuracy:—
4 “In the language of the English law, the word fee signifies an estate of inheritance as
5 distinguished from a less estate; not, as in the language of the feudists, a subject of tenure
6 as distinguished from an allodium.”
7 “Allodium being wholly unknown to English law, the latter distinction would in fact have
8 no meaning.” “A fee simple is the most extensive in quantum, and the most absolute in
9 respect to the rights which it confers, of all estates known to the law.”
10 END QUOTE
11
12 While I do NOT conduct any recycling business as nearly everything is generally purchased
13 from major stores as new, I am entitled to use it for other purposes than for which a product was
14 sold.
15 An example being that after your client caused this elaborate stress upon Olga and she is now
16 unable to walk freely on her own, I fitted 50 mm tubing along the fence so she can hold herself
17 onto it when needing to walk along the fence. There is absolutely no low that prohibits me to
18 use purchased materials for alternative purposes.
19
20 While Olga and I do not and have not operated any store at 107 Graham Road, Viewbank
21 nevertheless even if hypothetically we had been doing so the following may apply:
22
23 County Criminal Court: CRIMINAL LAW – CODE VIOLATIONS – Pursuant to
24 Pinellas County Code Section 138-1, a business falls under the zoning exclusion of the
25 definition of a volume reduction plant when it does not generate solid waste in the process
26 of reducing recycled materials for re-use in its business and for collection by a scrap metal
27 company. Reversed and remanded. Sarnago & Sons Properties, Inc. v. State, CRC07-
28 00085APANO (Fla. 6th Cir. App. Ct. May 27, 2009).
29
30 Traditionally Australians do engage in holding “Garage Sales” and ample of Victorian are
31 engaged in this, even so at times it appears to me those so called “Garage Sales” really might be
32 a cover for running really a “store”, but Olga and myself have never been interested in getting
33 involved in Garage Sales. Actually, more than 2 decades ago when we had special leather
34 furniture designed and delivered from interstate Olga asked me if we should hold a “Garage
35 Sale” to sell the old items and I declined this and simply donated the furniture to an
36 entertainment company which then placed the furniture for use of its customers. My view was
37 and remained to be the risk of holding a ‘garage sale” of perhaps attracting criminal elements
38 simply wasn’t worth it.
39
40 I used to live in the country and was known to go to auctions and purchase items. Not
41 uncommon I had other bidders asking if they could purchase some items from me that I had just
42 purchased, and I made clear I never sell any such items because it would in essence the vendor of
43 a higher bid, but I could simply give away certain items, and at times did so. So, I paid for items
44 and yet gave it away!
45
46 Actually, I have published books such as to the issue of “CITIZENSHIP” and when someone
47 requested a copy I not only provided the copy free of charge but even paid for the postage. Even
48 (as then known) Prince Charles thanked me for a copy he received. When a person used my
49 books to succeed in a court case I nevertheless declined to accept any monies, and this is what
50 caring for your fellow Australian/human being is about and not the crap Banyule City Council is
51 claiming while in reality terrorising residents, as I wrote to Mayor Cr Tom Milican!
52
7-12-2023 Page 3 © Mr G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B.
INSPECTOR-RIKATI® about the BLACK HOLE in the CONSTITUTION-DVD
A 1st edition limited special numbered book on Data DVD ISBN 978-0-9803712-6-0
PLEASE NOTE: You may order books in the INSPECTOR-RIKATI® series by making a reservation, or E-mail
admin@inspector-rikati.com See also www.scribd.com/inspectorrikati
 Page 4

1 No person can ever claim that in the decades that I represented parties I somehow charged them
2 for representing them in court and/or for my out of pocket expenses, even so I was lawfully
3 entitled to do so.
4 JUSTICE is not that a party must succeed regardless of the evidence, but is where both parties
5 have a fair and proper opportunity to present their cases before the court and the trial judge then
6 makes a decision having considered both presentations as to what he/she deem to be the correct
7 decision. The judge may value the evidence of one party above that of another even so one party
8 may have concealed relevant evidence but you cannot blame the judge for this. However, on
9 appeal ma party may seek to challenge a judicial decision or any legal; process that was not
10 properly followed and critical to the outcome of the case and then an Appellate court may
11 overturn the disputed judicial decision.
12
13 I often would explain to a party I represented that JUSTICE is not merely that they would win
14 their case but that the case was heard appropriately and the adjudicator such as a trial judge for a
15 FAIR MINDED PERSON appeared to hand down a fair and proper decision based upon the
16 evidence before the court, and not some crystal ball predicted judgment.
17
18 TAYLOR v. TAYLOR [1979] HCA 38; (1979) 143 CLR 1 (22 August 1979)
19 Similarly in Commissioner of Police v. Tanos (1958) 98 CLR 383, at p 395, Dixon C.J. and
20 Webb J. said that
21 QUOTE
22 it is a deep-rooted principle of the law that before anyone can be punished or prejudiced in
23 his person or property by any judicial or quasi-judicial proceeding he must be afforded
24 an adequate opportunity of being heard.
25 END QUOTE
26
27 As one party gave me the understanding, that even so the court had ruled in favour of the other
28 party at least the trail judge had given the opportunity to be heard. Far too often, lawyers are
29 making all kind of ridiculous statements to their clients that they will win rather than to express
30 reservation that as long as the court provided a fair and proper hearing one has succeeded, even
31 if the other party won the case.
32
33 I simply never was interested to try to make money out of the despair and suffering of others and
34 this is why I never was pursuing to get rich. Then why on earth would I want to waste my time to
35 try to run a store and making perhaps some monies where as I could easily have earned huge
36 amount of monies but declined to do so.
37
38 Not uncommon I would submit authorities that even at times opponent lawyers argued that I
39 must have fabricated the Authority as they never heard of it before even so the case was often
40 referred to, The difference was that unlike lawyers generally reading headings of a case I would
41 simply read a Law Report from front to back and mark what I held was important, and by this
42 created my own list of Authorities. And not uncommon when an opponent lawyer submitted a
43 particular authority I would object to it that it was altered and then when the court checked the
44 law report indeed found that the lawyer concerned had changed words to suit its party, which is a
45 big NO-NO as to violate the meaning of the judgment referred to.
46
47 When then the High Court of Australia in Palmer v WA dismissed the appeal quoting the
48 Framers of the Constitution I immediately realised that the judges has taken out-of-context what
49 had been stated and that they concealed what actually the Framers of the Constitution had stated.
50 There is no way the judges would go after me for exposing the true meaning as stated by the
51 Framers of the Constitution as they ought to be darn well know they deliberately concealed the
52 real meaning and application of the legal principles embedded in the constitution.
53
7-12-2023 Page 4 © Mr G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B.
INSPECTOR-RIKATI® about the BLACK HOLE in the CONSTITUTION-DVD
A 1st edition limited special numbered book on Data DVD ISBN 978-0-9803712-6-0
PLEASE NOTE: You may order books in the INSPECTOR-RIKATI® series by making a reservation, or E-mail
admin@inspector-rikati.com See also www.scribd.com/inspectorrikati
 Page 5

1 Where then you claim that your client was “authorised” then well show this actually occurred
2 and not merely the product of assumption!
3 QUOTE
4 D. Fire Rescue Victoria 18.
5 We confirm that on 6 and 7 September 2023, Authorised Council Officers had
6 authorisation to inspect the Land pursuant to Section 32 of the Fire Rescue Victoria Act
7 1958 (the Act).
8 END QUOTE
9
10 Why on earth would Fire Rescue Victoria “authorised” both on 6 as well as on 7 September
11 2023 for Banyule City Council to enter our property and not just on 6 September 2023 or just on
12 7 September 2023. This alone appeared to me to underline that your client may likely have
13 fabricated the authority. After all, there was no fire and so the Fire Rescue Victoria could simply
14 have at its own leisure pursued any alleged fire danger. But wait, there is more, you used aerial
15 images of 2018, 2019, 2020, 2021, 2022 and notably also an aerial image of 16 September 2023,
16 being 10 days after the first trespass. As such, the Fire Rescue Victoria couldn’t have relied on
17 an aerial image that wasn’t existing until 10 days after the first trespass. Further, if it was really
18 an issue in 2018 then why wait until 2023? And on and on I can refer to.
19
20 Are you really thinking that a judge is that backwards that he would accept that your client
21 Banyule City Council /Fire Rescue Victoria was so concerned as to an alleged fire danger in
22 2018 that they waited until 2023?
23 And, where I can produce images of fire hazards along the roads within Banyule then a court
24 may wonder why your client didn’t attend to that rather than terrorise residents!
25
26 Obviously, the question that remain is why did your client trespass upon the property on 29
27 November 2023 and terrorised in particular my wife with a purported notice that clearly failed to
28 provide the alleged 2 clear day notice. Angela O’Brien was so eager to continue her terrorism
29 that she couldn’t wait till say 30 November 2023 but simply couldn’t care less about what you
30 had referred to as she seems to me to hold she is above the rule of law.
31 So, now you got that you provide one set of dates apart of if they are at all legally valid, and your
32 client provides other dates ignoring what you wrote.
33 Without conceding any legality of your client’s conduct, even if your demand were legal in the
34 end I deliberately referred to:
35
36 Forster v Jododex Australia Pty Ltd (1972) 127 CLR 421 at 445 The true version of the
37 judgement under 5;
38 That where an instrument prescribes that a period of time may elapse between one event
39 and another, the words “at least”, not less than” and “not later than”, unless the
40 context or the subject matter reveals contrary intention, should be regarded as
41 indicating that a clear or full period of time must expire between the two events.”
42 There is some authority for saying that the use, in a statute prescribing a time limit, of such
43 expressions as "at least" and "not less than" indicate an intention that the specified number of
44 "clear days" must elapse between two acts or events (see R. v. Justices of Shropshire (1838)
45 8 Ad & E 173 (112 ER 803); Young v. Higgon (1840) 6 M & W 49 (151 ER 317); Chambers
46 v. Smith (1843) 12 M & W 2 (152 ER 1085); In re Railway Sleepers Supply Co. (1885) 29
47 Ch D 204 and Ex parte McCance; Re Hobbs (1926) 27 SR (NSW) 35; 44 WN 43).
48 But it is clear, I think, that significance is attached to such expressions as "at least" or "not
49 less than" only in cases where the immediate purpose of the prescription of a time is to
50 define a period on the expiration of which an act may be done, and not in cases where the
51 immediate purpose is to define a period within which an act must be done. In the former
7-12-2023 Page 5 © Mr G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B.
INSPECTOR-RIKATI® about the BLACK HOLE in the CONSTITUTION-DVD
A 1st edition limited special numbered book on Data DVD ISBN 978-0-9803712-6-0
PLEASE NOTE: You may order books in the INSPECTOR-RIKATI® series by making a reservation, or E-mail
admin@inspector-rikati.com See also www.scribd.com/inspectorrikati
 Page 6

1 class of case the prescribed number of days must elapse between two acts or events. In
2 the latter class of case the act must (unless a contrary intention appears) be done before the
3 expiration of the last of the prescribed number of days (see, e.g. Radcliffe v. Bartholomew
4 (1892) 1 QB 161 and Armstrong v. Great Southern Gold Mining Co. (1911) 12 CLR 382).
5
6 Also consider:
7 Project Blue Sky v Australian Broadcasting Authority [1998] HCA 28 (28 April 1998)
8 Dawson J pointed out in Hunter Resources Ltd v Melville when discussing the
9 statutory provision in that case: "substantial compliance with the relevant
10 statutory requirement was not possible. Either there was compliance or there
11 was not."
12
13 The reasoning of Fullagar J in Clayton v. Heffron (supra) in relation to the provisions of s 5B
14 of the Constitution Act 1902 (NSW) is material in this context:
15 "A manner and form are prescribed by section 5B, and that manner and form must be
16 observed if a valid law is to be produced. Any prescription of manner and form may be
17 repealed or amended, but, while it stands, the process prescribed by it must be followed.
18 That was decided Trethowan's case and I think that the whole of what is prescribed by
19 section 5B relates to manner and form. It does not seem to me to be possible to say that
20 some of the requirements of the section are matters of manner and form while others are
21 not. The section describes one entire process - a series of steps, one following on another -
22 and only the completion of the entire process can produce a valid law." (Supra at 262)
23
24 Now the following:
25

26
27
28 This is a “NOTIFICATION” OF “NOTICE OF ENTRY” !
29
30 https://tenantsvic.org.au/advice/during-your-tenancy/privacy/
31 Privacy and entry - Tenants Victoria
32 Notice of entry · In person between 8am and 6pm · By mail – however the rental
33 provider must add enough time for the mail to be delivered. · By electronic ...
34
35 There are numerous other links that can be checked out but essentially a Notice of Entry is to be
36 personally delivered or if posted to be posted well in advance.
37 While this link relates to tenancy the legal principle makes sense.
38
39 However there was no notice of Entry but a NOTIFICATION OF A NOTICE OF ENTRY,
40 which means it was not a NOTICE OF ENTRY but no more but a NOTIFICATION of a
41 NOTICE.
42
43 https://www.detectorinspector.com.au/entry-notifications/
44 The importance of entry notifications - Detector Inspector
45 21 July 2023 ... Entry notifications are a legal way to obtain access to properties in all
46 states, but legislation does differ by state and it's important that ...
47

7-12-2023 Page 6 © Mr G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B.

INSPECTOR-RIKATI® about the BLACK HOLE in the CONSTITUTION-DVD
A 1st edition limited special numbered book on Data DVD ISBN 978-0-9803712-6-0
PLEASE NOTE: You may order books in the INSPECTOR-RIKATI® series by making a reservation, or E-mail
admin@inspector-rikati.com See also www.scribd.com/inspectorrikati
 Page 7

1 What we have here therefore is not a NOTICE OF ENTRY but a NOTIFICATION of a NOTICE
2 OF ENTRY, which may or may not be provided.
3 As you referred to the back part of the property to state until 31 December 2023 then why did
4 Angela O’Brien and her accomplish enter the back part of the property on 29 November 2023 for
5 which even the purported NOTICE OF ENTRY was not existing because only the
6 NOTIFICATION that a NOTICE OF ENTRY would be provided?
7 If the intent was that the document purported to be a NOTICE OF ENTRY then the wording
8 “NOTIFICATION” simply was not appropriate, at least in my view.
9 People can engage in a “MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING” say about one buying the
10 property of the other person for a certain amount of monies, and later then draft an agreement to
11 purchase and exchange whatever to complete the contract. The Memorandum of understanding
12 could be held to be a notification of an agreement for a future contract of sale.
13 In my view you do not provide a notice to serve an alleged valid notice to entre!
14 Meaning, that the 29 November 2023 trespassing to do no more but try to serve a nonsense
15 NOTIFICATION that lacked even any legal basis clearly underlines how poorly your client has
16 been dealing with matters so far. One then may ask who on earth drafted the document and who
17 on earth authorised this? Also, how often in the past was this kind of document used against
18 residents.
19 It must be very clear that even the mere entry upon the back part of the house was in any event
20 unlawful and constituted trespassing, and in violation of your 25 October 2023 correspondence.
21 Meaning that even the purported NOTIFICATION (OF NOTICE TO ENTRE) regarding 1
22 December 2023 was invalid and having posted the NOTIFICATION (OF NOTICE TO
23 ENTRE) to enter on 8 December 2023 also is not a valid NOTIFICATION as to “entre”
24 because it is not a NOTICE TO ENTRE in itself.
25
26 I have never been hiding that I had no formal education in the English language and simply
27 learned by using words in the constitution by translating the meaning from English to Dutch (my
28 native language) but surely common sense should prevail that a notice to give a notice to entry
29 doesn’t make any sense unless the notice to entry was to be provided at as later time, so as to
30 notify say the tenant that a notice would be provided subsequently and so the tenant may have
31 more time to consult a lawyer, etc.
32
33 Now the next crap of the legislation which in my view has no legal force:
34
35 S. 138 amended by No. 37/2014 s. 10(Sch. item 124.3).
36 138 No legal proceedings against authorised persons
37 A person is not entitled to bring an action against an authorised person or a police officer
38 or the Crown or the employer of an authorised person in respect of any entry on land or
39 other action done or in good faith purportedly done in the course of an investigation or the
40 performance of any other duty under this Division.
41
42 As the States were created within Section 106 of the Commonwealth of Australia Constitution
43 Act 1900 (UK) “subject to this constitution” then the States are bound by the legal principles
44 embedded in this constitution! The High Court of Australia (albeit wrongly) clearly in Palmer v
45 WA relied upon a part of the Hansard transcript and as such underlines that to rely upon the
46 transcript is correct as a legal principle!
47 .
48 Hansard 2-2-1898 Constitution Convention Debates (Official Record of the Debates of the National Australasian
49 Convention)
50 QUOTE Mr. DEAKIN (Victoria).-
51 The record of these debates may fairly be expected to be widely read, and the observations to which I
52 allude might otherwise lead to a certain amount of misconception.
7-12-2023 Page 7 © Mr G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B.
INSPECTOR-RIKATI® about the BLACK HOLE in the CONSTITUTION-DVD
A 1st edition limited special numbered book on Data DVD ISBN 978-0-9803712-6-0
PLEASE NOTE: You may order books in the INSPECTOR-RIKATI® series by making a reservation, or E-mail
admin@inspector-rikati.com See also www.scribd.com/inspectorrikati
 Page 8

1 END QUOTE
2
3 Commonwealth of Australia Constitution Act 1900 (UK)
4 QUOTE
5 Chapter V—The States
6 106 Saving of Constitutions
7 The Constitution of each State of the Commonwealth shall, subject to this Constitution,
8 continue as at the establishment of the Commonwealth, or as at the admission or
9 establishment of the State, as the case may be, until altered in accordance with the
10 Constitution of the State.
11 END QUOTE
12
13 Hansard 1-3-1898 Constitution Convention Debates
14 QUOTE Sir JOHN DOWNER.-
15 I think we might, on the attempt to found this great Commonwealth, just advance one step,
16 not beyond the substance of the legislation, but beyond the form of the legislation, of the
17 different colonies, and say that there shall be embedded in the Constitution the righteous
18 principle that the Ministers of the Crown and their officials shall
19 be liable for any arbitrary act or wrong they may do, in the
20 same way as any private person would be.
21 END QUOTE
22
23 Meaning that;
24
25 S. 138 amended by No. 37/2014 s. 10(Sch. item 124.3).
26 138 No legal proceedings against authorised persons
27
28 has no legal force!
29
30 Neither the Commonwealth or the States/Territories can excuse any Minister and their officials
31 as to not be held legally accountable for any wrongdoing.
32
33 This is very important because as I indicated the States/Territories had no legislative, executive
34 and administrative powers to enforce their mandates and as such each and every Minister and
35 their officials can be held legally accountable for the harm inflicted upon the many and so their
36 officials regarding the covid scam “gene therapy” DEPOPULATION jab.
37
38 It means that all and any purported legislation to prevent a Minister and their officials to be
39 held legally accountable is no legislation at all.
40
41 And where then the councils claim to act for and on behalf of the Minister as an official then
42 they can be as much held legally accountable
43 Let it be clear, any judge who were to seek to railroad this set out would instantly no longer be a
44 judge because no judge can override the constitution! The following legal principle also applies
45 Australia!
46
47 Scheuer v Thodes, 416 US 232 94S Ct 1683, 1687 (1974) states:
48 “when a state officer (which includes Judges) acts under a state law in a manner violative
49 of the US Constitution, he comes into conflict with the superior authority of that
50 Constitution, and he is in that case stripped of his official or representative character and is
51 subjected in his person to the consequences of his individual conduct.
7-12-2023 Page 8 © Mr G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B.
INSPECTOR-RIKATI® about the BLACK HOLE in the CONSTITUTION-DVD
A 1st edition limited special numbered book on Data DVD ISBN 978-0-9803712-6-0
PLEASE NOTE: You may order books in the INSPECTOR-RIKATI® series by making a reservation, or E-mail
admin@inspector-rikati.com See also www.scribd.com/inspectorrikati
 Page 9

1 The State has no power to impart to him any immunity from responsibility to the
2 supreme authority of the United States”.
3
4 As such, the moment a judge seeks to interfere/undermine with the true meaning and application
5 of the constitution he instantly lost his official status to be a judge and is then no more but an
6 individual without judicial powers.
7 Those who are lawyers and practicing law are in fact OFFICERS OF THE COURT and the
8 moment any such OFFICER OF THE COURT were to seek to undermine my constitutional
9 rights then this lawyer no longer can be held to be an OFFICER OF THE COURT and while
10 remaining a lawyer (due to the University degree) however he/she can no longer practice law!
11
12 As for the planned trespassing on 8 December 2023, you better make sure that if you are the
13 legal representative of Banyule City Council they stop acting unlawfully and also in violation of
14 what you states and do not whatsoever seek to re-enter under any circumstances our property
15 without our consent. This also as the threats do in particularly harm my wife and may also
16 interfere with her ability to in an emergency attend to a hospital.
17 Do understand that where the Victorian Police fails to restrain Banyule City Council in their
18 criminal conduct then I am well entitled to use CITIZEN ARREST to protect my wife’s health,
19 wellbeing, safety and her life!
20
21 In my view your client would do better to seek to make a proposal that my wife and I may
22 deem acceptable in the circumstances as it ought to be clear that what your client Banyule
23 City Council has been doing has been unlawful and has been malicious against my wife and
24 myself and must be stopped.
25

26
27
28 We need to return to the organics and legal principles embed in of our federal constitution!
29
30 This correspondence is not intended and neither must be perceived to state all issues/details.
31 Awaiting your response, G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B. (Gerrit)

32 MAY JUSTICE ALWAYS PREVAIL®

33 (Our name is our motto!)

7-12-2023 Page 9 © Mr G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B.

INSPECTOR-RIKATI® about the BLACK HOLE in the CONSTITUTION-DVD
A 1st edition limited special numbered book on Data DVD ISBN 978-0-9803712-6-0
PLEASE NOTE: You may order books in the INSPECTOR-RIKATI® series by making a reservation, or E-mail
admin@inspector-rikati.com See also www.scribd.com/inspectorrikati