Page 1

1
2
3 Independent Broad-based Anti-corruption Commission 7-1-2022
4 Address: GPO Box 24234, Melbourne VIC 3001
5 Telephone: 1300 735 135
6 Email: info@ibac.vic.gov.au
7
8 COMPLAINT
9 20230107-Mr G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B. to IBAC – COMPLAINT -Part 18
10
11 THE ELEBORATE FRAUD PURPETRATED BASED ON A HOAX
12
13 Sir/Madam,
14 in this COMPLAINT ( which will be in several parts) I will address various matters
15 albeit not stated in any order of importance, while some must be considered also as to my past
16 complaints provided to IBAC. Do note what I wrote below:
17
18 My wife, for some years, has been attending to Lolita hairdresser at Banyule. Last year Lolita
19 (this is also the name of her business) gave me the understanding that she would not have any
20 jab of the experimental “gene therapy”. However at the next visit Lolita explained that the
21 Department of health had made clear that if she (and I understand her family members) did not
22 get the jab then they would close down her business. As Lolita had as I understand it just signed
23 a 3 year lease for the shop this obviously was terrorism up[on her.
24
25 In October 2022 Pfizer Director Janine Small admitted under oath in the EU Parliament to
26 EUMP Rob Roos that Pfizer had not tested if the jab would prevent infection or transmission to
27 others. Yet, the Victorian Government, including Premier Daniel Andrews was dividing the
28 Victorian community by claiming “the pandemic of the unvaccinated” also do it for your “mum,
29 dad, grandparents” etc, and even now young cashiers at stores often wear mask because they are
30 concerned about harming their grandmother. This is the terrorism that was inflicted upon
31 Victorians not only by Premier Daniel Andrews but also by his minions such as Brett Sutton
32 Chief Health Officer for Victoria, various Ministers for Health and numerous others.
33
34 As I understand it the TGA provided “provisional approval” for a “clinical trial” to be held with
35 reporting in 2023. Therefore none of the jabs (so called vaccines but are not as they are “gene
36 therapy” were approved for commercial use. All jabs used in Victoria I understand were
37 commercial purchased by the Federal Government with secrecy as to the terms of the contracts.
38
39 Victoria has no legislative, executive and/or administrative powers when it comes to any “man-
40 kind” diseases. (See my previous writings in that regard regarded to you) and therefore the
41 force/coercing of using unapproved jabs (“gene therapy) was and is unconstitutional/unlawful.
42

7-1-2023 Page 1 © Mr G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B.

INSPECTOR-RIKATI® about the BLACK HOLE in the CONSTITUTION-DVD
A 1st edition limited special numbered book on Data DVD ISBN 978-0-9803712-6-0
PLEASE NOTE: You may order books in the INSPECTOR-RIKATI® series by making a reservation,
or E-mail admin@inspector-rikati.com See also www.scribd.com/inspectorrikati
 Page 2

1 I am not representing Lolita however as Olga, my wife, is a customer and by this is placed at risk
2 of shedding then clearly this then is relevant to my wife Olga. This in particular where Olga
3 suffers from Heart Failure and other comorbidity. Because the Department of Health has terrorist
4 hairdressers that they all had to be having the jab, this leaves Olga without any alternative to
5 attend to a hairdresser. For the record for over 2 decades I hold Enduring Power of Attorney
6 regarding Olga and so can and do hereby represent her interest in this COMPLAINT.
7 Nothing in this writing must be and neither is intended to adversely reflect upon Lolita as I
8 understand that she didn’t want to have the jab but was coerced/forced into it.
9 Because of the shedding by those who had the jab this then places Olga at risk no matter which
10 hairdresser she would attend to.
11
12 It may be added that I understand the Victorian Government pursued a terrorist campaign using
13 the media to cause havoc and the incite Victorians against each other. Olga and I were denied to
14 enter certain stores because of not using the QR code, not proving to have a jab, not wearing a
15 mask, etc.
16 Olga was at some stage denied to accompany me to local shopping were the Victorian
17 Government made known only 1 member of the household was permitted to shop for supplies.
18 Bu this causing Olga to be left at risk if she had any sudden bursting of her veins as she has at
19 times and then I need to stop it to prevent her to bleed to death.
20
21 The Victorian government allow applied draconic measures all to do with mandates and use the
22 Victorian Police to muse not just violence but even using guns to shoot bullets upon parents
23 carrying small children who did n more but to peacefully exercise their constitutional rights to
24 protest. Premier Daniel Andrews (on video) making clear he was not concerned about “human
25 rights”.
26
27 Businesses were ordered to prevent certain people to be allowed to enter stores such as on 10
28 August 2020 when I sought to print out at Office Works Bundoora to print documents to file in
29 the High Court of Australia and by this preventing my constitutional rights to seek relief from
30 the High Court of Australia in regard of the unconstitutional Victorian mandates.
31 The Victorian Police on that day also ordered me to leave Coles, Northland for not wearing a
32 mask and being more than 5 kilometres from my residence and advised they would summons me
33 to court. Upon which I responded I was “ready”. However no summons ever was provided.
34
35 I understand that Premier Daniel Andrews claimed it was a “learning process” and he had
36 “wrong advises” but that I view cannot be any excuse for terrorism and as I view it to commit
37 TREASON to push the so called “vaccine mandates” and other mandates to suit the W.E.F.
38 (World Economic Forum”, the U.N. (United Nations) and the WHO (World Health
39 Organisation) goals for a New World Order. Neither of them being within our constitutional
40 system [Commonwealth of Australia Constitution Act 1900 (UK)]. Moreover, Premier Daniel
41 Andrews now still is pursuing their goals as a “smart cities” issue to prevent Victorians their
42 ordinary constitutional, legal, human and/or natural rights. As such he seems to be determined to
43 continue the as I view it communist system to be implemented in clear violation to our
44 constitutional rights of “political liberty” etc.
45
46 I understand that members of the Victorian Police are employed by a “private security firm” and
47 are not employed as “public servants’ and cannot be used by the Chief Health Officer to enforce
48 the unconstitutional/unlawful mandates. Yet the Victorian Police nevertheless used brutal violent
49 powers (see my previous submitted writings) upon Victorians to terrorised them unlawfully.
7-1-2023 Page 2 © Mr G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B.
INSPECTOR-RIKATI® about the BLACK HOLE in the CONSTITUTION-DVD
A 1st edition limited special numbered book on Data DVD ISBN 978-0-9803712-6-0
PLEASE NOTE: You may order books in the INSPECTOR-RIKATI® series by making a reservation,
or E-mail admin@inspector-rikati.com See also www.scribd.com/inspectorrikati
 Page 3

1
2 I am aware that many if not most politicians, lawyers, judges, etc, may be unaware of what the
3 true meaning and application of the Commonwealth of Australia Constitution Act 1900 (UK) is
4 but that to me is no excuse. Ignorance is no excuse.
5
6 I understand that in about 1926 the State of Victoria made voting compulsory and subsequently
7 so other states and even the Commonwealth, however it is and remains unconstitutional. I in
8 2001 as then as an INDEPENDENT candidate in a Federal election promoted that compulsory
9 voting was and remains to be unconstitutional. Obviously this placed me at risk to end up in
10 imprisonment if convicted, as to mislead electors that they did not have to vote compulsory.
11 However in AEC v Schorel-Hlavka (representing myself) I submitted on appeals on 19 July
12 2006 that “political liberty” excluded any “compulsory” voting as this would offend the electors
13 rights and the Framers of the Constitution specifically refused to provide for compulsory voting.
14 I also on 4 December 2002 obtained a court order that the NOTICE OF CONSTITUTIONAL
15 MATTERS I had filed with the Court was to be heard and determined by the High Court of
16 Australia. The then Victorian Attorney-General made known to abide by the Courts decision. I
17 succeeded in both appeals without any of the 9 Attorney-Generals and or the Commonwealth
18 challenging what I had submitted (in writing) to the Court in support of my successful appeals.
19 One of the issues was that the Commonwealth has no legislative powers to define/declare
20 “citizenship” as it was and remained a State legislative power. The Framers of the Constitution
21 also made clear that where a person was granted by a State to vote in the numerous House of
22 Parliament of that State then by Section 41 of the constitution the person had
23 AUTOMATICALLY the right to vote in federal elections. The Framers of the Constitution
24 made clear that “Australian Citizenship” was not a nationality but was derived from being a
25 State citizen.
26
27 Hansard 2-3-1898 Constitution Convention Debates (Official Record of the Debates of the National Australasian
28 Convention)
29 QUOTE Mr. BARTON.
30 If we are going to give the Federal Parliament power to legislate as it pleases with regard
31 to Commonwealth citizenship, not having defined it, we may be enabling the Parliament to
32 pass legislation that would really defeat all the principles inserted elsewhere in the
33 Constitution, and, in fact, to play ducks and drakes with it. That is not what is meant by the
34 term "Trust the Federal Parliament."
35 END QUOTE
36
37 Hansard 5-3-1891 Constitution convention Debates
38 QUOTE Mr. DEAKIN:
39 The people of this continent were not landed upon its shore to-day ignorant of the
40 responsibilities of self-government. They have amply proved in the past that they are
41 entitled to be trusted with all the powers appertaining to a free people. They have believed
42 that they enjoyed freedom [start page 86] under their present constitution second to none in
43 the world.
44 END QUOTE
45
46 Hansard 17-3-1898 Constitution convention Debates
47 QUOTE Mr. HOLDER.-
48 We know that it could never have been perfect by any possible contingency. But we may
49 claim that it is sufficiently perfect for a free and self-reliant people to live under its rule
50 with their freedom undiminished; and my answer to those who ask whether the Bill is
51 acceptable in this light is this: When we met in this Convention we entered upon a task in
7-1-2023 Page 3 © Mr G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B.
INSPECTOR-RIKATI® about the BLACK HOLE in the CONSTITUTION-DVD
A 1st edition limited special numbered book on Data DVD ISBN 978-0-9803712-6-0
PLEASE NOTE: You may order books in the INSPECTOR-RIKATI® series by making a reservation,
or E-mail admin@inspector-rikati.com See also www.scribd.com/inspectorrikati
 Page 4

1 which we realized we should be untrue to the trust reposed in us if we had not dealt with
2 the matters which came before us with the sense of responsibility resting upon every one of
3 us that we were dealing with matters on behalf of independent and self-reliant states.
4 END QUOTE
5
6 Hansard 2-3-1898 Constitution Convention Debates
7 QUOTE
8 Mr. SYMON.-Very likely not. What I want to know is, if there is anybody who will
9 come under the operation of the law, so as to be a citizen of the Commonwealth, who
10 would not also be entitled to be a citizen of the state? There ought to be no opportunity for
11 such discrimination as would allow a section of a state to remain outside the pale of the
12 Commonwealth, except with regard to legislation as to aliens. Dual citizenship exists, but it
13 is not dual citizenship of persons, it is dual citizenship in each person. There may be two
14 men-Jones and Smith-in one state, both of whom are citizens of the state, but one only is a
15 citizen of the Commonwealth. That would not be the dual citizenship meant. What is
16 meant is a dual citizenship in Mr. Trenwith and myself. That is to say, I am a citizen
17 of the state and I am also a citizen of the Commonwealth; that is the dual citizenship.
18 That does not affect the operation of this clause at all. But if we introduce this clause, it is
19 open to the whole of the powerful criticism of Mr. O'Connor and those who say that it is
20 putting on the face of the Constitution an unnecessary provision, and one which we do not
21 expect will be exercised adversely or improperly, and, therefore, it is much better to be left
22 out. Let us, in dealing with this question, be as careful as we possibly, can that we do not
23 qualify the citizenship of this Commonwealth in any way or exclude anybody [start page
24 1764] from it, and let us do that with precision and clearness. As a citizen of a state I
25 claim the right to be a citizen of the Commonwealth. I do not want to place in the
26 hands of the Commonwealth Parliament, however much I may be prepared to trust
27 it, the right of depriving me of citizenship. I put this only as an argument, because no
28 one would anticipate such a thing, but the Commonwealth Parliament might say that
29 nobody possessed of less than £1,000 a year should be a citizen of the Federation. You are
30 putting that power in the hands of Parliament.
31 Mr. HIGGINS.-Why not?
32 Mr. SYMON.-I would not put such a power in the hands of any Parliament. We must rest
33 this Constitution on a foundation that we understand, and we mean that every citizen of a
34 state shall be a citizen of the Commonwealth, and that the Commonwealth shall have no
35 right to withdraw, qualify, or restrict those rights of citizenship, except with regard to one
36 particular set of people who are subject to disabilities, as aliens, and so on.
37 END QUOTE
38
39
40 HANSARD 12-4-1897 Constitution Convention Debates
41 QUOTE Mr. BARTON:
42 It is provided that instead of, as before, the Parliament having power to constitute a
43 judiciary, there shall be a Supreme Court, to be called the High Court of Australia, as
44 a part of the Constitution-that I believe to be an improvement-and other courts which
45 the Parliament may from time to time create or invest with federal jurisdiction.
46 END QUOTE
47
48 It should be understood that those who are in diplomatic services and/or military services
49 (serving abroad) for the Commonwealth of Australia remain to be Australian Citizens for
50 residential purposes.

7-1-2023 Page 4 © Mr G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B.

INSPECTOR-RIKATI® about the BLACK HOLE in the CONSTITUTION-DVD
A 1st edition limited special numbered book on Data DVD ISBN 978-0-9803712-6-0
PLEASE NOTE: You may order books in the INSPECTOR-RIKATI® series by making a reservation,
or E-mail admin@inspector-rikati.com See also www.scribd.com/inspectorrikati
 Page 5

1 There is no such thing as “Australian Citizenship” being a “nationality”.

2
3 This therefore means that no person can be a Member of the Supreme Court of Victoria when
4 not able to be an “Australian Citizen” as a “nationality.
5
6 I am aware of the High Court of Australia having handed down the Sue v Hill judgment
7 however as the High Court of Australia is part of the constitution and not above it the Sue v Hill
8 judgment was without legal force as the HCA cannot amend the true meaning and application of
9 the constitution.
10
11 Re Wakim; Ex parte McNally; Re Wakim; Ex parte Darvall; Re Brown; Ex parte Amann; Spi [1999] HCA 27 (17
12 June 1999)
13 QUOTE
14 For constitutional purposes, they are a nullity. No doctrine of res judicata or issue estoppel
15 can prevail against the Constitution. Mr Gould is entitled to disregard the orders made in
16 Gould v Brown. No doubt, as Latham CJ said of invalid legislation, "he will feel safer if he
17 has a decision of a court in his favour". That is because those relying on the earlier
18 decision may seek to enforce it against Mr Gould.
19 END QUOTE
20
21 What the High Court of Australia made clear that one can ignore any High Court of Australia
22 court order which is based upon unconstitutional legislative provisions.
23
24 The Victorian Government is pursuing (to suit the goals of W.E.F.) also for digital payments,
25 this even so the constitution specifically provides that the States can only allow payments in gold
26 and silver coins.
27
28 As I have submitted before the courts the purported Victorian Constitution Act 1975 is not a
29 constitution at all as the true constitution is the former 1855 Victorian (Colonial) Constitution
30 Act which upon federation became the Victorian (State) Constitution Act 1855 which has not
31 been amended and remains in force.
32
33 It should be understood that where I placed before the Courts above matters and succeeded in
34 both appeals, unchallenged, then I am entitled to the benefits of those appeals.
35
36 Where I succeeded that “compulsory” voting is unconstitutional and the constitution was not
37 merely created for my benefits but applies to all Australians then clearly likewise all Australians
38 are entitled not to be subjected to “compulsory” voting.
39
40 In view that I made my complaint to the Victorian Electoral Commission prior to the 2022
41 Victorian election being held then where none of the purported Members of (Victorian)
42 Parliament can have ‘Australian citizenship” as a “nationality” which is a legal requirement, then
43 none of the alleged elected members of Parliament are duly elected.
44 This means that where Section 106 of the constitution created the states “subject to this
45 constitution” and so also it’s embedded legal principles, any person who was a Minister at the
46 time that writs were issued in Victoria for the Victorian election not having been (legally that is)
47 re-elected after 3 months of the issue of the writs no longer are Ministers.
48
49 http://www.gazette.vic.gov.au/gazette/Gazettes2022/GG2022S622.pdf
50 Special Gazette Number S622 Dated 1 November 2022
7-1-2023 Page 5 © Mr G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B.
INSPECTOR-RIKATI® about the BLACK HOLE in the CONSTITUTION-DVD
A 1st edition limited special numbered book on Data DVD ISBN 978-0-9803712-6-0
PLEASE NOTE: You may order books in the INSPECTOR-RIKATI® series by making a reservation,
or E-mail admin@inspector-rikati.com See also www.scribd.com/inspectorrikati
 Page 6

1 SPECIAL. Victoria Government Gazette. No. S 622 Tuesday 1 November 2022. By

2 Authority of Victorian Government Printer. Constitution Act 1975. PROCLAMATION.
3
4 https://www.gazette.vic.gov.au/gazette/Gazettes2022/GG2022S622.pdf
5 This copy of the Gazette is not showing the writ itself but merely a mentioning of the writs.
6
7 https://www.rmit.edu.au/news/factlab-meta/victorian-election-writs-are-in-order
8 QUOTE
9 The writs for the 2022 Victorian state election were signed by the governor and issued to
10 the VEC on November 1, 2022, she said.
11 “It was filmed by Sky News, and that footage is publicly available,” she said. “And it was
12 also recorded in the Victorian Government Gazette on that day.”
13 The Sky News footage is available here and the record in the Victorian Government
14 Gazette is available here.
15 END QUOTE
16 And
17 QUOTE
18 The verdict
19 False. There is no legal requirement for election writs to be publicly displayed at polling
20 centres, according to the Victorian Electoral Commission. The writs for the 2022 Victorian
21 state election was signed by the Governor of Victoria on November 1, 2022. Footage of the
22 election writs being signed and a record of the writs being issued are publicly available
23 online.
24 END QUOTE
25
26
27 https://www.vec.vic.gov.au/voting/learn-to-vote/sorting-fact-from-fiction
28 Sorting fact from fiction - Victorian Electoral Commission
29 Elections can generate lots of differing views and opinions, and your social media feeds
30 might be filled with posts and ads about the election. Social media is ...
31
32 While this VEC website may claim to rely upon official publications the truth is that I have for
33 years exposed that official websites provide false, misleading information a clear example was
34 that the jab was “safe and effective” didn’t alter DNA and stopped infections and transmissions
35 while all this was disinformation by the TGA, Department of Health, politicians and their
36 minions.
37
38 https://www.skynews.com.au/australia-news/politics/writs-issued-for-victorian-state-
39 election/video/db2efe6431e5e3a3daf7ee4840abf4c0
40 Writs issued for Victorian state election | Sky News Australia
41 1 Nov 2022 ... The Victorian election campaign is now officially underway with
42 the writs being signed by the state's Governor Linda Dessau at Government ...
43
44 The problem with this is that as I proved in AEC v Schorel-Hlavka that it is not when a
45 Governor-General (so a Governor) signs a Proclamation and/or Writs but when they are
46 published in the relevant Gazette.
47
48 Where the Writs were not published in the Gazette then there was no lawful election held for this
49 also.
50

7-1-2023 Page 6 © Mr G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B.

INSPECTOR-RIKATI® about the BLACK HOLE in the CONSTITUTION-DVD
A 1st edition limited special numbered book on Data DVD ISBN 978-0-9803712-6-0
PLEASE NOTE: You may order books in the INSPECTOR-RIKATI® series by making a reservation,
or E-mail admin@inspector-rikati.com See also www.scribd.com/inspectorrikati
 Page 7

1
2 This document provides certain undisputed court evidence for “WARRANTS ISSUE FOR
3 THE POLITICAL CRIMINALS AND THEIR COLLABORATORS/MINIONS”. Let us
4 hold them all legally accountable for the harm they inflicted upon the many. TREASON,
5 TERRORISM, crimes against humanity, etc, are criminal matters and now let the
6 criminal’s dobbing in each other! No amnesty!
7 https://www.scribd.com/document/617974183/20230105-Mr-G-H-Schorel-Hlavka-O-W-B-to-R-Kershaw-
8 Chief-Commissioner-of-AFP-Suppl-93-Part17-Electors-candidates-covid-Scam-Etc
9 QUOTE
10 ADDRESS TO THE COURT, Part 3
11 County Court of Victoria, Case numbers T01567737 & Q10897630
12 QUOTE
13 WATSON v. LEE (1979) 144 CLR 374
14
15 "Where any statutory rules are required by any Act to be published or
16 notified in the Gazette, a notice in the Gazette of the rules having been
17 made, and of the place where copies of them can be purchased, shall be
18 sufficient compliance with that requirement." (at p379)
19
20 6. The primary means of notifying the terms of a regulation which has been
21 made is by its publication in full in the Gazette. What is required by HYPERLINK
22 "http://www.austlii.edu.au/au/legis/cth/consol_act/aia1901230/s48.html" s. 48
23 (1) is notification of the regulation, not of the fact of its making or of the
24 date of its making. In my opinion, the notification of a regulation involves
25 the bringing to notice of its actual terms. Thus, in my opinion, HYPERLINK
26 "http://www.austlii.edu.au/au/legis/cth/consol_act/aia1901230/s48.html" s. 48 (1) of
27 the HYPERLINK "http://www.austlii.edu.au/au/legis/cth/consol_act/aia1901230/"
28 Acts Interpretation Act really requires the terms of the regulation to be
29 published in the Gazette. It must be accepted that such publication places the
30 citizen in the position of being able to inform himself of the terms of the
31 law by which he is to be bound. (at p379)
32
33
34 Meaning, that unless the Proclamation can be proven to have been provided for sale to the
35 citizen, there was never any publication on 8 October 2001! If there no publication on 8
36 October 2001, then the issue of the writs also was not constitutional possible!
37
38 As you are well aware, in view of your evidence given to the JSCEM) I am currently
39 having litigation against the Australian Electoral Commission, the Commonwealth and all
40 Governors as well as the Governor-General before the High Court of Australia!
41
42 Again also;
43 It must be accepted that such publication places the
44 citizen in the position of being able to inform himself of the terms of the
45 law by which he is to be bound.
46
47 Meaning that the Gazette must be actually published in every Member State to be
48 effective! Writs are being issued for each member State separately and can’t be
49 constitutional valid unless first a writs in regard of the Proclamation was first Gazetted in
50 that member State.
7-1-2023 Page 7 © Mr G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B.
INSPECTOR-RIKATI® about the BLACK HOLE in the CONSTITUTION-DVD
A 1st edition limited special numbered book on Data DVD ISBN 978-0-9803712-6-0
PLEASE NOTE: You may order books in the INSPECTOR-RIKATI® series by making a reservation,
or E-mail admin@inspector-rikati.com See also www.scribd.com/inspectorrikati
 Page 8

1 Details now obtained under the FOI Act, albeit with about 8 months delay, shows that at no
2 time was Special Gazette S421 containing the Proclamation actually published in New
3 South Wales or Tasmania! In Canberra it was on 9 October 2001, In Victoria 10 October
4 2001, and so on!
5
6 As such, each and every writs was issued PRIOR TO the proclamation being actually
7 published.
8 END QUOTE
9
10 The following underlines that the Gazette was not at all published on 8 October 2001 but on 9
11 October 2001 AFTER the writs already (albeit wrongly) issued on 8 October 2001.
12
13 For clarification as to which cities are referred to I added in brackets the names;
14
15 9/10/01 GO CAS0153391 Trf to CA Transfr -2 -0.02 CA ZZ
16 BMO5IAI
17
18 11/03/02 GO BOI 53/2 GAZETTES Wr-Off 20 0.20
19 11/10/01 GO SGAZ421 . Subs Issue Adj Dist -6 -0.06
20 9/10/01 GO CAS0153391 Trf to CA Transfr -2 -0.02 CA (CANBNERRA)
21 9/10/01 GO ICN0910ADL ICN to AD Transfr -1 -0.01 AD (ADELAIDE)
22 9/10/01 GO ICN1076CAN ICN to CA Transfr -3 -0.03 CA (CANBERRA)
23 9/10/01 GO ICN0907MEL ICN to ME Transfr -1 -0.01 ME (MELBOURNE)
24 9/10/01 GO ICN0886PER ICN to PE Transfr -1 -0.01 PE (PERTH)
25 9/10/01 GO ICN0881TOV ICN to TH Transfr -1 -0.01 TN TOWNVILE ?)
26 8/10/01 GO FGS0153363 CANPRINT PO-Fins 35 0.35
27 8/10/01 GO FGS0153363 CANPRINT Receipt 35 0.35
28
29 This shows that CANPRINT did not publish any of S421in Brisbane (Queensland), Sydney
30 (N.S.W.), Hobart (Tasmania).
31
32 WATSON v. LEE (1979) 144 CLR 374
33
34 "Where any statutory rules are required by any Act to be published or
35 notified in the Gazette, a notice in the Gazette of the rules having been
36 made, and of the place where copies of them can be purchased, shall be
37 sufficient compliance with that requirement." (at p379)
38 and
39 It must be accepted that such publication places the
40 citizen in the position of being able to inform himself of the terms of the
41 law by which he is to be bound.
42
43 As such, an alleged press release is not sufficient!
44
45 As Special Gazette S421was intended to have on 8 October 2001 the Proclamation Gazetted
46 (published) for a dissolution of the House of Representatives at 11.59am and Prorogue the
47 Parliament at 12 noon then the publication of this on 9 October 2001 was too late and the
48 Writs issued on 8 October 2001 were without constitutional/legal force. As I at the time also
49 made clear was that the Governor-General ought to have issued an “amendment
50 Proclamation” that would have provided for example that the Writs were to be (re) issued on

7-1-2023 Page 8 © Mr G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B.

INSPECTOR-RIKATI® about the BLACK HOLE in the CONSTITUTION-DVD
A 1st edition limited special numbered book on Data DVD ISBN 978-0-9803712-6-0
PLEASE NOTE: You may order books in the INSPECTOR-RIKATI® series by making a reservation,
or E-mail admin@inspector-rikati.com See also www.scribd.com/inspectorrikati
 Page 9

1 10 October 2001 and then the election to be held on 17 November 2001. But the arrogant
2 persons rather persisted with the invalid election on 10 November 2001.
3 END QUOTE
4
5 https://www.rmit.edu.au/news/factlab-meta/victorian-election-writs-are-in-order
6 QUOTE
7 VEC manager, communication, Ms Marie Guerin, told RMIT FactLab that “there is
8 absolutely no requirement under the law for us to publicly display the writ”.
9 “There is no requirement for the writ to be displayed anywhere, including at voting
10 centres,” she said.
11 END QUOTE
12
13 It should be clear that the signing of a proclamation and/or a writ is merely part of a legal
14 required process but it is the publication in the Gazette that is the completion of the process.
15 Therefore if writs were signed but not published in the Gazette on 1 November 2022 then no
16 valid election was or could have been held.
17 This means no one was elected to the Victorian Parliament albeit as the Proclamation to
18
19 https://www.gazette.vic.gov.au/gazette/Gazettes2022/GG2022S622.pdf
20 QUOTE

21
22 END QUOTE
7-1-2023 Page 9 © Mr G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B.
INSPECTOR-RIKATI® about the BLACK HOLE in the CONSTITUTION-DVD
A 1st edition limited special numbered book on Data DVD ISBN 978-0-9803712-6-0
PLEASE NOTE: You may order books in the INSPECTOR-RIKATI® series by making a reservation,
or E-mail admin@inspector-rikati.com See also www.scribd.com/inspectorrikati
 Page 10

1
2 The above copy of the Proclamation fails to show that the Governor “prorogued” the parliament.
3 This means that even if the writs had been published in the Gazette (not that I seek to imply they
4 were) then the Writs would be without legal force, as like in the AEC v Schorel-Hlavka case
5 unless the proclamation to prorogue the Parliament is first published in the Gazette (which in
6 AEC v Schorel-Hlavka I proved had not been as the writs purportedly were issued on 8 October
7 2001 and the proclamation not published until 9 October 2001) then the writs were without legal
8 force.
9
10 What appears to me is that Premier Daniel Andrews is too much obsessed with (albeit in
11 violation of S44 of the Commonwealth of Australia Constitution Act 1900 (UK)) seeking to do
12 the work for the W.E.F. he in the process blatantly ignore to ensure proper legal procedures are
13 followed. While he might claim he had “wrong advises” ultimately he was the one advising the
14 Governor and it appears to me he simply is not up to do the job properly. In the end I view that
15 without proper publication of the Writs Victorians were not provided the relevant information
16 they were entitled upon. It was up to the Victorian Government to ensure that copies of the writs
17 was placed in the Gazette and that they were for sale in the Victorian Government Bookshop.
18
19 One has to ask when you got a person allegedly re-elected after 8 years in power and still unable
20 to understand the basics of what is required then surely, HOUSTON WE GOT A PROBLEM!
21 While he might blame “wrong advises” in the end he as Premier is responsible to ensure matters
22 are appropriately conducted. His blatant ignorance over the years to consider details/information
23 provided to him is no excuse to have people being harmed and indeed dying!
24
25 The clerk of the executive council merely states what she claimed the Governor ordered but the
26 missing part is the writs themselves!
27
28 Let us put it in another way: A person is informed by VicRoads licenced tester that he/she
29 passed the test and a driver’s licence will be issued. Then the person commenced to drive but the
30 drivers licence never is issued because say the person who did the testing died before being able
31 to get the paperwork completed required for the issue of a driver’s licence or by error the person
32 tested was recorded having failed the test. Would then the courts nevertheless hold that the
33 person was a licensed driver? I do not think so. The High Court of Australia had a case where a
34 person had applied for naturalization and this was granted but the person was never advised of
35 this and so never completed the final part of it. The court held he was not naturalized and could
36 and was deported. Hence it is not relevant what a clerk may claim as it is about the official
37 publication in the Gazette of the terms of the writs and not what some clerk rightly or wrongly
38 may claim.
39 In my view no valid election was held! And if the same was done in the past than each and every
40 previous election would have been invalid.
41
42 ADDRESS TO THE COURT
43 County Court of Victoria, Case numbers T01567737 & Q10897630
44 QUOTE ADDRESS TO THE COURT
45 IN RE WOOD (1988) 167 CLR 145 F.C. 88/018
46 QUOTE
47
48 The return does not meet the exigency of the writ (Drinkwater v. Deakin, at p 638) because
49 Senator Wood was incapable of filling the 12th place. That is not to say that, putting to

7-1-2023 Page 10 © Mr G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B.

INSPECTOR-RIKATI® about the BLACK HOLE in the CONSTITUTION-DVD
A 1st edition limited special numbered book on Data DVD ISBN 978-0-9803712-6-0
PLEASE NOTE: You may order books in the INSPECTOR-RIKATI® series by making a reservation,
or E-mail admin@inspector-rikati.com See also www.scribd.com/inspectorrikati
 Page 11

1 one side "a mere abuse of the right of nomination or an obvious unreality" (Harford v.
2 Linskey (1899) 1 QB 852, at p 862 and cf. Pritchard v. Mayor, &c. of Bangor (1888) 13
3 App Cas
4 241), the Electoral Officer who makes a return has authority himself to
5 determine the qualifications of a candidate (who declares and maintains that he is duly
6 qualified: HYPERLINK
7 "http://www.austlii.edu.au/au/legis/cth/consol_act/c167/s170.html" s.170 (a)(ii) of
8 HYPERLINK "http://www.austlii.edu.au/au/legis/cth/consol_act/c167/" the Act ) or to
9 refuse to return the name of an otherwise successful candidate whose qualifications are in
10 issue: see HYPERLINK
11 "http://www.austlii.edu.au/au/legis/cth/consol_act/c167/s172.html" s.172 of
12 HYPERLINK "http://www.austlii.edu.au/au/legis/cth/consol_act/c167/" the Act and
13 Evans v. Thomas (1962) 2 QB 350. But the performance by the Electoral Officer of his
14 ministerial functions in these respects does not determine the validity of the return or
15 the efficacy of the election of an unqualified person to a vacant place in the Senate.
16 END QUOTE
17 END QUOTE ADDRESS TO THE COURT
18
19 Likewise, if previous elections were not in accordance to what is legally required then for this
20 also no valid elections were held and Premier Daniel Andrews simply could then not have been a
21 Member of Parliament or so anyone else regarding such invalid election. This then places in
22 question the validity of any purported legislation by those who without legal validity voted on
23 Bills.
24
25 In my view Premier Daniel Andrews and his collaborators/minions have been too much
26 obsessed to implement the draconic conditions to suit the W.E.F., U.N and WHO rather than to
27 properly engage in what is appropriate for the State of Victoria and so Victorians.
28
29 In my view the man is grossly incompetent and should be charged for his deception, terrorism,
30 etc.
31
32 And while he still fails to respond about my grandson Dion Schorel this issue will not go away!
33
34 We need to return to the organics and legal principles embed in of our federal constitution!
35
36 This correspondence is not intended and neither must be perceived to address all issues.
37 Awaiting your response, G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B. (Friends call me Gerrit)

38 MAY JUSTICE ALWAYS PREVAIL®

39 (Our name is our motto!)

7-1-2023 Page 11 © Mr G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B.

INSPECTOR-RIKATI® about the BLACK HOLE in the CONSTITUTION-DVD
A 1st edition limited special numbered book on Data DVD ISBN 978-0-9803712-6-0
PLEASE NOTE: You may order books in the INSPECTOR-RIKATI® series by making a reservation,
or E-mail admin@inspector-rikati.com See also www.scribd.com/inspectorrikati