20221112-Mr G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B. To R Kershaw Chief Commissioner of The AFP-Suppl 92-HIGH TREASON. Etc-Supplement 2

Page 1
1
2
3 Reece Kershaw (Australian/Victoria date) 12-10-2022
4 Chief Commissioner of the Australian Federal Police
5 Forwarded via email commissioner@afp.gov.au
6
7 Cc: acv@health.gov.au Advisory Committee on Vaccines, Therapeutic Goods Administration
8 PO Box 100, WODEN ACT 2606 Attn: Pharmacovigilance and Special Access Branch, MDP 122
9 Committees@health.gov.au Committee Support Unit, Therapeutic Goods Administration
10 PO Box 100, WODEN ACT 2606 Attn: Scheduling & Committee Support Section, MDP 122
11
12 Mr A. Albanese (via portal)
13
14 Mr Daniel Andrews Premier daniel.andrews@parliament.vic.gov.au
15 attorney-general@justice.vic.gov.au
16
17 Re: 20221112-Mr G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B. to R Kershaw Chief Commissioner of the AFP-Suppl 92-
18 HIGH TREASON, etc-Supplement 2
19 COMPLAINT
20 Sir,
21 further to my original COMPLAINT of 6 August 2021 I provide a further supplement hereby.
22
23 We have politicians like “Traveling Pete” (Anthony Albanese) Governments making known
24 that the NDIS (National disability Insurance Scheme) cannot afford paying for 65 plus year old.
25 My message is then stop the (so called) vaccine scams!
26
27 Video: INJECTING NEUROTOXINS CDC Vax Schedule Systematically Poisons Infants
28 With Huge Amounts Of Aluminum
29
12-11-2022 Page 1 © Mr G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B.
INSPECTOR-RIKATI® about the BLACK HOLE in the CONSTITUTION-DVD
A 1st edition limited special numbered book on Data DVD ISBN 978-0-9803712-6-0
PLEASE NOTE: You may order books in the INSPECTOR-RIKATI® series by making a reservation, or E-mail
admin@inspector-rikati.com See also www.scribd.com/inspectorrikati
Page 2
1 We have the drug pushers, meaning politicians, medical profession , the media and other minions
2 all pushing the interest of pharmaceutical companies even to the extent that their own
3 descendants can be seriously harmed if not killed in the process. Those ghoulish kind of people
4 are not representing Australian way of life values but rather are casting their evil spell upon
5 humanity.
6 I too was deceived when having my children jabbed not aware that this was actually placing
7 them in harm’s way. Now that I have researched matters and become aware of it I view the need
8 to expose it to as many persons as possible.
9
10 QUOTE 20221108-Mr G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B. to Mark Butler The Minister for Health and Aged Care
11 & Event201 Mr T Inglesby & C Rivers (Part 1)
12 Mark Butler The Minister for Health and Aged Care (Australian date and time) 8-11-2022
13 minister.butler@health.gov.au
14
15 Cc: Mary-Anne Thomas The Minister for Health (Victoria)
16 mary-anne.thomas@parliament.vic.gov.au
17
18 Mr Anthony Carbines, Minister for Police & Ors
19 anthony.carbines@parliament.vic.gov.au, minister.carbines@justice.vic.gov.au
20
21 AND TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN
22
23 20221108-Mr G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B. toMark Butler The Minister for Health and Aged Care
25
26 COMPLAINT
27 Sir,
28 Previously I Cc’d you copies of my correspondence to Mary-Anne Thomas and Mr Anthony
29 Carbines which refers to my grandson Dion Schorel where as I understand it he ended up with
30 “AUTISM and Echolalia” due to childhood vaccinations required by the State of Victoria.
31 About 4 decades ago ma trial judge made known that my tactic of cross-examining witnesses
32 was that of a “TRAPDOOR SPIDER” as His Honour made known that I would extract some
33 details in cross-examination and then continued upon this to extract more and more. In other
34 legal proceedings an opponent barrister then complained that I was “surgically taking apart his
35 witness Affidavit” during cross-examination. Working for a private company I was known to act
36 on my guts feelings that regardless if as a quality control officer found a product being
37 manufactured according to the drawing requirements I would still put a REJECT notice on the
38 work where I had a guts feeling that something was nevertheless wrong with it. And afterwards
39 time and time again was proven to be correct. For example while the product was what the
40 customer required it was not what was ordered and so I insisted they had to provide a deviation
41 order regarding the incorrect order as otherwise I would not release the products.
42
43 Olga my wife attended to a heart specialist on 2 October 2019 having been through various
44 testing (privately charged) and then given the result she essentially had no issue to be concerned
45 about. I have no medical or scientific formal training and much to the ire of my wife that she
46 used to make clear never to be with her at a doctors consultation. However, on 10 August 2019 I
47 held my wife was in ill health and needed medical attention. She initially brushed i9t off but I
48 insisted to take her to a hospital and well she ended up in ICU and spend 10 days in hospital
49 having “Heart Failure” and other comorbidities. The doctor gave me the understanding that had I
50 waited a few hours Olga would likely have died. From that time Olga insist I will be at her side
51 whene3ver she attends to a doctor. She discovered that somehow I use “common sense” and turn
52 out to know a lot more than she ever realised previously.
53
Page 3
1 When then the claim went about that there was a SARS-CoV-2 virus I decided to make sure
2 Olga wouldn’t end up being harmed and so spend thousands of hours searching on the internet
3 for articles/videos, etc.
4 Early 2020 I realized that this SARS-CoV-2 claimed virus might be a mere fiction such as the
5 WMD (Weapons of mass Destruction) claimed in Iraq and over time I realized that it might be
6 actually something in the air as happens with Hey fever. I actually read that Neil Ferguson (UK)
7 (of the computer modelling disgrace) suggested that Hay fever should be used as a variant of
8 COVID-19 so the investors could make a lot more money. As Such, to me it appeared to be a
9 COVID-19 SCAM.
10 Over time I even wrote that I didn’t think it was a virus from China.
11 I read up about the so called “Spanish flu” where actually it appears that at Fort Detrick in the
12 USA soldiers had been injected with some vaccine and then when they travelled to Spain they
13 spread the illness that was flu like and the mask caused more harm in the process. At Fort
14 Detrick they did clinical trials proving that the flu could not be transmitted from one person to
15 another. As such, what was dubbed the “Spanish flu” appears to have been something appearing
16 to be a flu but a manipulated alternative that could be transmitted.
17 I understand that in early 2019 again at Fort Detrick there was an outbreak and a person died and
18 subsequently in August 2019 the Fort Detrick laboratories were temporary closed. Still it appears
19 to me that likely one or more soldiers may have travelled to Europe and so to Italy and may have
20 caused some infection to spread in Italy where blood samples dated 3 September 2019 and later
21 in September found antibodies of what now is referred to as COVID-19 to be in the blood of
22 cancer patents. As such, the spread of the call it “Ford Detrick disease” (wrongly named
23 COVID-19) was in my view from Fort Detrick originating. From there it was spread to Europe
24 and likely if any country maintained blood samples in storage of cancer patients as they did in
25 Italy then you may find that they too have antibodies contained in those samples.
26 There is therefore also an issue that prior to the games being held in China the Chinese
27 Government already held an exercise to spray a person coming from a plane pretending her to be
28 infected with some disease. More than likely in about August 2019 the Chinese Government
29 became aware of there being a disease going on.
30
31 Video “Italy, September 2019” by Dr John Campbell Re 3 September 2019
32
33
34 Italy and numerous other countries attended to the October 2019 Military Sport event in Wuhan
35 China albeit Australia is not listed. This may be why Australia was not particularly affected until
36 sometime later, albeit it was wrongly assumed it were the “flatten the curve” and the mandates.
37
38 I understand that Italy had a severe outbreak and this was deemed to indicate how severe this
39 was, rather than that the disease already have likely been going around the world and so also had
40 been going about in Italy. Therefore the actual number of people infected may have been a lot
41 more than was originally assumed.
42

Page 4
1 It neither must be ignored that already Bill Gates had been using mosquitos to purportedly
2 combat other mosquitos but I understand that this was later abandoned when people died.
3
4 I also wrote to India medical staff about my concerns regarding mask being assembled in
5 Mumbai slums and dumped on the ground as my concern was the dust from the mask could be
6 very harmful. Well I later u8nderstood that the BLACKDEATH went about in India and wrote
7 again urging to stop using mask that may have been contaminated in Mumbai slums.
8
9 I also became aware that an ICU doctor in New York warned that people were really being killed
10 using ventilators because those ventilators were not programmed for the use of people suffering
11 from so to say high altitude sickness. The ventilators were therefore really being killing
12 machines. I mat the time wrote that I suspected that likely mosquitos could have been released
13 which may simulate the malaria disease causing high altitude sickness. Subsequently I
14 discovered that AstraZeneca apparently engaged 2 scientist who had been working with Malaria
15 issues.
16
17 In Melbourne I became aware that certain Age care centres seemed to have deaths whereas
18 others not in the same manner. Checking all kinds of video’s I noticed that so called “deep
19 cleaning” of a age care centre was worthless because some person from the4 kitchen using
20 personal protection equipment (PPE) would then go to the dump-master and touch it with the
21 gloves and later returned with the now contaminated gloves to the kitchen and so may likely
22 have been the cause of the spread of whatever killed the elderly as well as staff members.
23
24 Another issue is that Pfizer appeared to indicate that the so called vaccine (which it is not) should
25 not be injected into the blood stream but into the muscle. Well, it appears to me that in Taiwan
26 there is a strict rule that it must be injected into the muscle and the person injecting must aspirate
27 first (by pulling back the plunger to see if any blood is drawn) and then if no blood is drawn then
28 the injection can proceed. However, numerous videos I watched shows not single person
29 injecting actually did aspirate. Generally they push the needle into an arm while already having
30 their thumb on the plunger which indicates they will not aspirate and show they indeed didn’t.
31 Meaning that all deaths and other harm cannot be blamed on the content of the so called vaccine
32 as many may have been by directly injecting the content into the bloodstream.
33
34 Australia has a legal principle embedded in its constitution of “political liberty” and this includes
35 FREEDOM OF SPEECH and yet the Federal government with its minions were preventing this
36 constitutional rights.
37
38 We had EVENT 201 and I noticed that Jane Halton indicated to get the press on site. Well it
39 appears the Federal Government so to say bribed the media by handing out cash to them while
40 allowing small businesses to be wrecked.
41
42 While the general purpose of EVENY 201 appeared to be to prepare for the issue of a pandemic,
43 in reality this was already going with what I refer to as a “Fort Detrick disease” and so the
44 EVENT 201 to me was really to indicate that governments must align themselves with the World
45 Health Organisation as to pursue the W.E.F. (World Economic Forum) DEPOPULATION
46 goals.
47 I understand that Klaus Schwab (W.E.F.) himself acknowledged this was an opportunity for the
48 Great Reset.
49
50 While the release from Fort Detrick may have been accidental they lacked proper safety
51 measures to prevent the spread of whatever disease was not leaked when a person was reported
Page 5
1 to have died from the disease. As like with the misnamed Spanish Flu that I understand also was
2 originating from Fort Detrick we had a repeat of the same and this just underlines that by
3 misnaming a disease to get the USA of the hook is a dangerous thing to allow for.
4
5 When there appears to me a spider web of connections then it may be reasonable to
6 assume that there might be more to it all, after all, the covid scam must have involved
7 a lot of people around the world., and it appears to have been originated from
8 W.E.F., the WHO, etc. medical doctors apparently provided with a kickback for
9 prescribing certain medication, etc. Now it is about holding the evil doers legally
10 accountable and pay for the harm inflicted.
11 You can download the document from:
12 https://www.scribd.com/document/604063723/20221031-Mr-G-H-Schorel-Hlavka-O-W-
13 B-to-R-Kershaw-Chief-Commissioner-of-the-AFP-Suppl-92-HIGH-TREASON-Etc-
14 Supplement-1
15
16
17 This document also sets out certain matters and more are available at my “inspectorrikati”
18 Scribd blog.
19
20 As I indicated in my previous writings it appears to me that the State of Victoria kidnapped my
21 grandson Dion Schorel and well as Dion is disabled and so falls within the exclusive
22 constitutional legislative powers of “(xxiii) invalid and old-age pensions;” then the State cannot
23 even use its so called child protection legislation to override the Commonwealth powers.
24 It means that at best the State of Victoria could have raised an issue with the Commonwealth if it
25 had any concerns about my grandson Dion Schorel, failing that they had no legal powers
26 whatsoever to kidnap Dion, let alone subject him to the absurdity of mandates like compulsory
27 wearing a face mask that restricts his air intake, etc.
28 Dion should have been medically assessed as to his health and wellbeing even in regard of any
29 vaccination.
30 However, as like the covid craze to force jabbing at all cost the same has been with other
31 vaccinations this even so the States have no legislative, executive and/or administrative powers
32 to force any vaccination upon any child relating to any “man-kind” infectious disease.
33
34 Hansard 7-2-1898 Constitution Convention Debates (Official Record of the Debates of the National Australasian
35 Convention)
36 QUOTE Mr. BARTON (New South Wales).-
37 I do not think the word quarantine, for instance, which is used in the sub-section of the 52nd clause, is
38 intended to give the Commonwealth power to legislate with regard to any quarantine. That simply applies to
39 quarantine as referring to diseases among man-kind.
40 END QUOTE
41
42 In my view the Federal government had no legal authority to engage in any secret contract with
43 any pharmaceutical company and then conceal from Australians what it was about. There is a lot
44 more to it all but that will be for further parts I will provide in due course.
45
46 When I wrote to the Victorian Ombudsman on 8 April 2020 and the Victorian Human Rights
47 commissioner on 13 April 2020 I did not receive any satisfactory response and neither from the
48 Victorian State government either. I also by now filed over 5,000 pages of complaint with the
49 Australian Federal Police and well more than likely will have to pursue further matters to get
50 appropriate action
51

Page 6
1 One thing is I did not wear a mask in 2020, 2021 and/or in 2022 and neither was jabbed and
2 likely this is why I am still alive. My wife is this month turning 90 and likely because of
3 protecting her against the murderous regime that caused so many to suffer and even die. In my
4 view we need to hold tribunals and anyone convicted with the covid scam should be awarded the
5 death penalty. No amnesty as now has been claimed should be provided as those who were
6 involved in this elaborate mass murder shall have to face the legal consequences of their deeds.
7
8 Olga’s specialist secretary Mary made known that the hospital refused to provide any service
9 while she was unvaccinated and so for any cancer treatment she had to be vaccinated. She was
10 vaccinated and later stated to Olga and myself her cancer was in remission. When my wife
11 attended to the specialist the secretary now there advised that Mary was on her death bed. She
12 actually died that day, due to the inflammation of the cancer far worse than before.
13 Olga’s hairdresser vowed she would not be jabbed as it was too dangerous. Well the Victorian
14 government simply send someone around that if she didn’t get vaccinated then her business
15 would be closed down. When Olga later attended she made known that she was vaccinated
16 because she had just signed a 3 year rental contract and couldn’t afford to be closed down.
17
18 We had this nonsense that unvaccinated had to be locked up in quarantine centres because it was
19 the “pandemic of the unvaccinated” and they then were killers and anti8-socierty not caring
20 about others. Well it turned out that Pfizer and also Moderna never tested for any prevention of
21 infecting others, this despite that the CDC, Fauci, Joe Biden, and numerous others around the
22 world claimed that vaccination would stop spreading it, even would prevent a person to get sick.
23 It was all based upon lies and I did way back in 2020 write to Premier Daniel Andrews but he
24 ignored it all. Yet claimed that “every life” matters while in fact he did precise the opposite to
25 cause more deaths, etc.
26
27 I in 1985 designed a document titled “ADDRESS TO THE COURT” (written submissions) and
28 well one day a judge made clear he was not going to read it. I then appealed this and the Full
29 Court made clear that the judge didn’t have to read it but he still had to consider it as part of his
30 judgment and he failed to do so. This means that anyone may not desire to read my writings but
31 when they make a decision and/or fail to make a decision having not considered my writings
32 then well they can be held legally accountable. Not uncommon an opposing lawyer at a hearing
33 suddenly realises that he didn’t answer my “ADDRESS TO THE COURT” and then find I
34 oppose any adjournment successfully as their ignorance should not justify any adjournment.
35 The same is with my writings otherwise, those who fail to act appropriately may just discover
36 that in time there will be no excuse for having done so.
37 Last year I wrote about the scientist Franc from Poland and about the eggs he discovered in vails.
38 Now embalmers find cloths in the corpses. I can assure anyone that if harm further comes to
39 Dion due to having been jabbed then well the legal consequences will be pursued to every
40 extend. I view the Federal government would do better to place a moratorium upon all
41 vaccinations and to immediately investigate what can be done to prevent those vaccinated (If you
42 can call it that regarding mRNA) to end up being harmed by cloths, etc.
43
44 We need to return to the organics and legal principles embed in of our federal
45 constitution!
46
47 This correspondence is not intended and neither must be perceived to state all issues/details.
48
49 Awaiting your response, G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B. (Gerrit)
50 MAY JUSTICE ALWAYS PREVAIL®

51 (Our name is our motto!)
52
Page 7
1 END QUOTE 20221108-Mr G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B. to Mark Butler The Minister for Health and Aged
2 Care & Event201 Mr T Inglesby & C Rivers (Part 1)
3
4 The following (first 7 pages) is about Premier Daniel Andrews, then leader of the opposition,
5 involvement of an accident allegedly involving his wife Catherine and a 15 year old cyclist. Did
6 Daniel Andrews allegedly drive away with the unroadworthy vehicle only to return shortly
7 thereafter possibly again driving the unroadworthy motor vehicle, both making statements
8 containing false details/information to the Victorian Police as appears to me they did? Does this
9 make Daniel Andrews ineligible to be a candidate in the State of Victorian election (consider
10 Section 44 of the Commonwealth of Australia Constitution Act 1900 (UK) where the states are
11 created in S106 “subject to this constitution”? The pages thereafter refer to the vaccine scams
12 and how vaccinated persons are suffering considerable harm versus unvaccinated persons.
13
14 QUOTE 20221110-Mr G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B. to Hon Bruce Atkinson MLC & Ors
15 Hon Bruce Atkinson MLC (Australian date and time) 10-11-2022
16 bruce.atkinson@parliament.vic.gov.au
17
18 Cc: Matthew Guy
19
21
22 20221110-Mr G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B. to Hon Bruce Atkinson MLC & Ors
23
24 Sir,
25 a few years ago I had misplaced the birthday card for Olga (my wife) and well this year I
26 decided to give it earlier then to wait for her birthday. My wife commented this was early. Well,
27 the next day she received your mail with the 90year birthday congratulation.
28
29 I wish to thank you also on behalf of Olga for this courtesy as regrettably many politicians once
30 in a job tend to forget who they represent. Some time ago Olga sked me who represents us in
31 Parliament and when I commented Matthey Guy she asked who he was as she really never heard
32 from him albeit hear his names mentioned at times on the radio. Actually, years ago when I
33 mentioned your name she immediately commented that she knew about you because she had
34 been at a meeting listening to you and she was impressed with what you stated and that is why
35 she remembered you.
36
37 While writing to you I may as well use the opportunity to comment on other issues, and perhaps
38 you might even be able to locate Matthey Guy’s and pass on my writing to him also. After all we
39 are his constituents.
40
41 https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-11400339/Dan-Andrews-role-Blairgowrie-
42 bicycle-crash-Ryan-Meuleman-Mornington-Peninsula-revealed.html
43 Dan Andrews role in Blairgowrie bicycle crash with Ryan Meuleman ...
44 2 days ago ... Read Daniel Andrews and his wife Catherine's dramatic witness ...
45 The police report ruled out any charges against the driver or the cyclist ...
46
47 https://www.9news.com.au/national/victorian-premier-daniel-andrews-questions-2013-car-crash-
48 teenager/4d66aacc-8880-4d11-bdea-8ba43e052d45
49 Daniel Andrews questioned over 2013 car crash involving teen
50 QUOTE
51 He claimed to the Herald Sun he was unable to speak to the officers because there had
52 been "tubes removed from (his) throat".
53 "They did not come back at any time thereafter to get a statement from me," he said.
54 Victoria Police did not lay any charges in relation to the incident.
55 END QUOTE
Page 8
1
2 I understand that the child cyclist involved is Ryan Meuleman then 15 years of age.
3
4 It appears to me that Catharine Andrews (the alleged driver) failed to give right away to a
5 pushbike cyclist who was travelling along the same Melbourne Road, when she was turning right
6 into Ridley Street. In my view a motorist turning from a road must give way to all other
7 travellers who are travelling along the same road but travelling straight ahead. As such, where
8 the push bike driver was colliding with the motor vehicle then this means that Catherin Andrews
9 blocked his right of way. Daniel Andrews allegedly the front passenger in the vehicle driven by
10 his wife Catharine Andrews in his alleged statement to the police stated: “The incident occurred
11 adjacent to the corner of Melbourne Rd and Ridley St Blairgowrie.” And “We had turned right
12 from a stationary position into Ridley St. Moments after we turned a cyclist collided heavily with
13 the side of our vehicle.” And “The cyclist was travelling at speed and hit our car our car at a
14 perfect right angle very heavily. I want to make it clear – the cyclist hit our vehicle.
15
16 What appears to me to have been the incident and likely a reconstruction will indicate this, is that
17 the pushbike driver was about to cross Ridley St when Catharine Andrews appeared in front of
18 him and the cyclist then hit the front side of the bumper and the impact was such that the cyclist
19 hit the windscreen heavily. Meaning that Catherin Andrews at no time attempted to give way but
20 had had a speed that the cyclist ended up on the windscreen and not just on the bonnet. It may
21 also indicate that in my view Catherin Andrews by her own version having stated “I turned from
22 Melbourne Road after coming to a complete stoop. I recall this because I waited to allow a
23 Sorrento-bound learner driver to pass. Just after I we had turned into Ridley St our car was
24 heavily struck on the front driver’s side by a cyclist who it seems was attempting to cross Ridley
25 Street at speed from the bike path that runs parallel to Melbourne Road.”
26 In my view “Just after I we had turned into Ridley St” is incorrect this as the turn is not
27 completed until one had cleared any part of Melbourne Road, which clearly she had not as she
28 was blocking the cyclist in Melbourne Road part.
29 Catharine also stated: “At no time was he visible from the road.” and “At no point was he visible
30 to me or any passenger in our vehicle until he collided with us.”
31 Hence, I view this was amounting to a false statement to the police.
32 How on earth can she state “At no point was he visible to me or any passenger in our vehicle
33 until he collided with us.” When her statement must be as to what she saw as facts and not what
34 any passenger may or may not have seen.
35
36 In my view, Catherine having noticed that a motor vehicle driving along Ridley Street was a
37 learner driver may indicate that she was concentrating upon that motor vehicle and coming from
38 a stop position then accelerated with such a speed that caused a considerable heavily impact. A
39 reconstruction may indicate that the force of the collusion with the windscreen must have been
40 that Catherine failed to take proper care and attention and never bothered to check for any other
41 road users travelling along Ridley Road (other than the learner driver) as to give way.
42 Catherin comment also is puzzling “I immediately stopped the car and raced to provide the
43 cyclist with assistance. My husband immediately called 000 for an ambulance. He made the call
44 from the corner of Melbourne Road and Ridley Street ensuring no vehicle entered the
45 intersection potentially causing further injury.” To me this is a bit of window dressing because
46 the accident was at the corner of Melbourne Road and Ridley Street and so why mention this
47 unless this was for a certain specific purpose to claim being there when there was no need for
48 doing so. Why use the wording “raced” when the cyclist was on the driver’s side of the vehicle.
49 How does one get out of the driver’s side to have “raced” to the cyclist who was there?

Page 9
1 “As a result of the collision the front windscreen smashed and glass was thrown through my car.
2 I received abrasions to the inside of my upper legs from the glass.” Well did this alleged abrasion
3 end up in any police/paramedics report?
4
5 I understand that the cyclist claimed that a man and a woman looked at him but didn’t render any
6 assistance as such. I understand a woman claimed that she attended and allegedly the car had
7 driven off. Yet Catharine claimed in her statement: A number of local residents joined us in
8 providing assistance to the cyclist. I do not know the names of these people. I waited with the
9 cyclist until paramedics had taken him for hospital treatment.”
10 What is astounding to me is that she refers to a cyclist but not about it being a child cyclist.
11 Surely, if she had attended to the injured cyclist she would have likely been aware it was a child
12 not an adult.
13 What seems to have been if one was to consider the claims of a woman who attended is that
14 Catherine or Daniel had driven off in the now unroadworthy motor vehicle (considering the
15 windscreen damages) and returned minutes later finding that already someone was attending to
16 the injured cyclist and so pretended to have been there all along that Daniel went to the corner
17 for other traffic, where if she had been attending to the cyclist she would or should have known it
18 was a child cyclist. This in my view indicates she never may have bothered to attend to the
19 injured cyclist and hence didn’t know it was a child. Indeed, if the statement to the police
20 allegedly was made about 8 months later and she still refers to “It was a very nasty collision and
21 I sincerely hope that the cyclist involved makes a full and complete recovery.” Underlines she
22 likely never knew it involved a child cyclist.
23 Considering the damage to the motor vehicle I view that likely a reconstruction would indicate
24 that she hit the cyclist with a considerable impact causing the child cyclist to be thrown onto the
25 bonnet and smash the windscreen. The trajectory, in my view (not being a specialist in this field)
26 nevertheless indicates that the force was caused by the vehicle rather than the child cyclist.
27 Had the impact been caused by the child cyclist with a vehicle just moving from a stop position
28 turning then more than likely the trajectory would have been that the child cyclist “at speed”
29 would likely have ended up over the bonnet to the other side of the motor vehicle.
30 As such, as it appears to me Catherine having allowed to the learner driver to pass never
31 bothered to check for other road users along Melbourne Road and speeded up to make the turn
32 that her speed was such to cause such a heavily impact.
33
34 Daniel Andrews alleged police report stated “We had turned right from a stationary position into
35 Ridley St. Moment after we turned a cyclist collided heavily with the side of our vehicle.” As the
36 vehicle was in my view still turning as it was still in Melbourne Road then using the wording
37 “We had” is deceptive and misleading, As I view it should be “We were” (in the process of
38 turning.
39
40 Also the following statement: “My wife stopped the car immediately and provided assistance and
41 comfort to the cyclist. I immediately proceeded a few metres away to the corner of Melbourne
42 Rd calling 000 and protecting against any car driving directly into the accident scene.”
43 The part of this statement “I immediately proceeded a few metres away to the corner of
44 Melbourne Rd” doesn’t make sense to me as he “proceeded a few meters away to the corner”
45 even so he was actually already at the corner! And “My wife stopped the car immediately and
46 provided assistance and comfort to the cyclist.” But somehow there is at no time any mention
47 about the cyclist being a child! Again, if Catherine did actual provide assistance then surely she
48 would have become aware she was dealing with a child cyclist and I view would have bothered
49 to ask his name. Perhaps also asked him if she needed to call his parents.
50

Page 10
1 I understood from a woman claiming to have been there that she was the first to attend to the
2 child cyclist and so it makes no sense that Catherine and Daniel both claimed that Catherin
3 rendered assistance. And again if about 8 months later they still didn’t know it involved a child
4 cyclist then I would ordinary conclude they made false and misleading statement.
5
6 If either of them but perhaps (assuming) Daniel drive the damaged motor vehicle away while
7 being unroadworthy due to the smashed windscreen, then in itself would involve a conspiracy
8 because Daniel should have known one is not permitted to leave the scene of an accident. Were
9 it involves 2 people (Daniel and Catherine) then may constitute a conspiracy. If they did drive of
10 and shortly thereafter returned then this was again a usage of an unroadworthy motor vehicle.
11
12 Daniel also stated “Police, Ambulance Paramedics and others from surrounding houses and
13 passer’-by were soon on the scene.”. I am not aware if the Police followed proper investigations
14 protocol or because Daniel Andrews was then the leader of the Opposition they simply decided
15 to shove it so to say under the carpet. Did the police not mention to Catherine she had hit a child
16 cyclist? Or was it that the police attended afterwards when the child already was transported
17 away by the ambulance?
18 Did Christine make a claim against any insurance company and so what was her claim? Or was it
19 that the vehicle was on the name of Daniel Andrews (from Parliament) and so he had to make a
20 claim and/or statement to what eventuated. What kind of claim/statement was made and what, if
21 any, compensation was claimed for the child cyclist damaged pushbike?
22 In the end Daniel refers to “This was a deeply traumatic event for all involved. I can only say
23 I’m thankful that the young cyclist was not mere seriously injured.” Followed with this strange
24 comment “I wish him good health and a complete recovery from his injuries.” As the latter part
25 hardly is about “FACTS” regarding the accident itself. And referring to “young cyclist” could
26 also refer to a young cyclist already an adult and not necessarily refers to a child cyclist.
27 One may also ask about what real concern did Catherine and/or Daniel show as to did they visit
28 the child at the Children Hospital and offered to compensate for the replacement of the pushbike
29 Extraordinary is that as I understand it from reports that the Victorian Police attended to Ryan
30 the child cyclist but then the injured child was unable to talk and the Victorian Police allegedly
31 thereafter never bothered to continue their investigation to what the child had to say about the
32 indicant. It is also astounding that the police involved recommended no further action to be taken
33 when in my view even a first year constable would have been aware this was a very serious issue
34 that required a proper investigation.
35 Why indeed as is reportedly claimed no recovery vehicle was involved so the vehicle was
36 subjected to forensic investigation as to seek to reconstruct how the accident eventuated.
37 There is also a claim that there were obstruction, and the drawing appears to indicate this
38 however, roads often has parked cars, etc, along footpaths, etc, and motorist simply has to look
39 out for other road users.
40
41 The police report does refer to “Cyclist was treated at the scene by MAS and taken by air to
42 Royal Childrens.” as such the police were clearly aware they were dealing with a child cyclist.
43 Also the report states: “Cyclist collided with the front drivers side of the vehicle, causing the
44 cyclist to be ejected onto the windscreen, causing it to smash.” This to me very narrowed
45 description itself ought to indicate that it appears rather that Christine hit the cyclist and the force
46 of the impacts caused the child cyclist to hit the windscreen to smash it.
47 The police report also seems to claim “Nil witnesses, police unable to speak with cyclist,
48 however damage to vehicle consistent with drivers story, call the father of cyclist. NFPA to be
49 taken with either party.”
50 Here you got as child cyclist severely injured and the police unable to speak to this child cyclist
51 and well decide no further police action to be taken as well just accept the drivers version. If
Page 11
1 there were “Nil witnesses” then was Daniel Andrews not a witness, where he was a passenger
2 when his wife was driving?
3
4 I wonder is this really the accident investigation protocol that when it involves a politician’s
5 family member then well the one sided version is deemed sufficient rather than a full
6 investigation including any drug and/or alcohol testing?
7
8 64288099-11400339-The_police_report_ruled_out_any_charges_against_the_driver_or_th-a-
9 5_1667862090409
10
11
12
13 64288105-11400339-Catherine_Adams_stresses_she_was_the_driver_at_the_time_of_the_i-a-
14 3_1667862090328

Page 12
2
3
4 64288123-39-Daniel_Andrews_gave_police_a_formal_statement_about_the_crash_a_-a-
5 4_1667862090330
Page 13
2
3
4 I recall going for my truck licence when I stopped in the middle of the road to make a right hand
5 turn and a vehicle came from opposite direction with his left indicator blinking as if he was to
6 turn left. At that time right turning vehicles had right of way over left turning vehicles. I however
7 held the driver from opposite direction was not intending to turn left but rather to drive to the
8 curb past the intersection as his face was not at all looking sidewards for any other road users on
9 the footpath, etc, to turn left. I was right. Afterwards the driving instructor commented that he
10 thought I would fail the test because it appeared to him I had right of way, and didn’t realise that
11 the driver from opposite direction was not intending to turn at all. And this is what is essential
12 that when you are a road user you need to consider all road users and try even to observe their
13 conduct or the lack of certain conduct, as I did.
Page 14
1
2 Next issue is that my grandson Dion Schorel as I understand it was kidnapped by the State of
3 Victoria from his father’s sole care. At least that is what I understand from my son Mark Schorel.
4
5 As you likely are aware is that the Victorian Government as with other Australian Governments
6 have been pursuing childhood vaccinations and also the so called COVID-19 vaccinations. Due
7 to Olga in 2019 ending up in ICU with Heart Failure and other comorbidities I held it my
8 responsibility that when there was this COVID-19 claim to do my own investigation.
9
10 As a constitutionalist I do my own research and concluded that the States have no legislative,
11 executive and/or administrative powers when it comes to “man-kind” infectious diseases since
12 the Commonwealth commenced to legislate with the Quarantine Act 1908 since then superseded
13 by the Biosecurity Act 2015 (Cth). (see below re Quarantine Re diseases)
14
15 This is very relevant because my grandson Dion as I understand it ended up with “AUTISM and
16 Echolalia” and with these disability he actually falls under the exclusive legislative powers of
17 the Commonwealth.
18 Regretfully we have that doctors and also scientist are using the mantra that vaccine doesn’t
19 cause AUTISM, regardless of that there is sufficient medical evidence to prove it does!
20 Below some charts from the video: https://www.bitchute.com/video/YH7HTmI8yEBD/ Oct 28, 2022
21 Vaxxed VS Unvaxxed: US Child Vaccines Are POISON Causing Breathing, Neuro &
22 Blood Disorders?
23 FULL Vaccine Playlist Here: https://odysee.com/@TimTruth:b/Vaccines-Mercury-
24 Dangerous:4?lid=80bab6995ad30d399ec4ad81ee5cc127e37c3da5
25
26

Page 15
1
2
3
5
6

Page 16
3
4

Page 17
1
2
4 Convention)
5 QUOTE Mr. BARTON (New South Wales).-
6 I do not think the word quarantine, for instance, which is used in the sub-section of the 52nd clause, is
7 intended to give the Commonwealth power to legislate with regard to any quarantine. That simply applies to
8 quarantine as referring to diseases among man-kind.
9 END QUOTE
10
11 You may download from the link shown above the video as to understand/comprehend the extent
12 of harm to Australian children (which is similar to the USA children) and also adults.
13
14 Premier Daniel Andrews was much about safing “every life” when in fact it appears to me he is
15 doing precisely the opposite. Due to Olga Heart Failure and other comorbidities she couldn’t
16 wear a mask. I too am exempted from wearing a mask and didn’t wear any in 2020, 2021 and
17 2022 and at no time fell ill from this called COVID-019.
18
19 The claimed COVID-19 disease somehow already existed as has been established from blood
20 samples taken on 3 September 2019 in Italy. And before (in about June 2019) that Fort Detrick
21 (USA) was closed down due to a dead near the laboratory facilities.
22 Video “Italy, September 2019” by Dr John Campbell Re 3 September 2019
23
24
25 Italy and numerous other countries attended to the October 2019 Military Sport event in Wuhan
26 China albeit Australia is not listed. This may be why Australia was not particularly affected until
27 sometime later, albeit it was wrongly assumed it were the “flatten the curve” and the mandates.
28 I understand that Italy had a severe outbreak and this was deemed to indicate how severe this
29 was, rather than that the disease already have likely been going around the world and so also had
30 been going about in Italy. Therefore the actual number of people infected may have been a lot
31 more than was originally assumed.
Page 18
1
2 Video: Viral transmission not tested in Pfizer trials-John Campbell (UK) about Rob Roos
3 MEP & Janine Small
4
5
6
7 As a CONSTITUTIONALIST I hold the legal principles embedded in the Commonwealth of
8 Australia Constitution Act 1900 (UK) very important, however, it appears that the so called
9 political leaders of State, Territory and Federal couldn’t give a hood about it.
10
11
12 HANSARD18-2-1898 Constitution Convention Debates (Official Record of the Debates of the National
13 Australasian Convention)
14 QUOTE Mr. ISAACS.-
15 The right of a citizen of this great country, protected by the implied guarantees of its Constitution,
16 END QUOTE
17 .
18 HANSARD 27-1-1898 Constitution Convention Debates
19 QUOTE
20 Mr. BARTON.-Our civil rights are not in the hands of any Government, but the rights of the Crown
21 in prosecuting criminals are.
22 END QUOTE
23
24 Yet we now find that some health official is dictating masks, social distancing, lockdowns and
25 curfews for alleged “disease” that it has actually no legal authority to enforce as it is a federal
26 issue (quarantine) and yet again grossly mismanaged, in this case by South Australia so called
27 “Hotel quarantine” system. Now Victorians are to suffer yet another round of financial
28 hardship also where there are all kinds of ridiculous rules of which in my view NONE were
29 based upon proper scientific evidence.
30
31 Where indeed was/is the scientific evidence Brett Sutton relied upon to dictate
32 compulsory masks wearing?
33
34 Where was/is the scientific evidence for social distancing justification?
35
36 Where was/is the scientific evidence for lockdowns justifications?
37
38 Where was/is the scientific evidence for curfews justification?
39

Page 19
1 Where was/is the scientific evidence for the unconstitutional border closures
2 justification?
3
4 Let them prove they actually “isolated” the virus they claim to exist!
5
6 Merely because some person may be a health official doesn’t mean this person has the
7 knowledge and/or competence to appropriately deal with a matter. We have the overall
8 federal legislation Biosecurity Act 2015 (Cth) and the Minister cannot delegate his powers.
9 Let indeed follow the “science” but then actual “science” not pretended imaginary science!
10
11 https://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2022/10/24/speed-of-
12 science.aspx?ui=2452e48ee850e01d1c6738932cddb7dcaf9043a15984f355d7aa522cd46b564a&s
13 d=20201124&cid_source=dnl&cid_medium=email&cid_content=art1ReadMore&cid=20221024
14 &cid=DM1271927&bid=1627931146
15 ‘Speed of Science’ — A Scandal Beyond Your

16 Wildest Nightmare
17 QUOTE
18 STORY AT-A-GLANCE
19  The premise behind COVID shot mandates and vaccine passports was that by taking the
20 shot, you would protect others, as it would prevent infection and spread of COVID-19
21
22  In early October 2022, during a COVID hearing in the European Parliament, Dutch
23 member Rob Roos questioned Pfizer’s president of international developed markets,
24 Janine Small, about whether Pfizer had in fact tested and confirmed that their mRNA jab
25 would prevent transmission prior to its rollout
26
27  Small admitted that Pfizer never tested whether their jab would prevent
28 transmission because they had to “move at the speed of science to understand what
29 is happening in the market ... and we had to do everything at risk”
30
31  We’ve known for well over two years that the shots were never tested for transmission
32 interruption. In October 2020, Peter Doshi, associate editor of The BMJ, highlighted that
33 trials were not designed to reveal whether the vaccines would prevent transmission. Yet
34 everyone in government and media insisted they would do just that
35
36  It was never about science or protecting others. It was always about following a
37 predetermined narrative that sought to get experimental mRNA technology into as many
38 people as possible
39 END QUOTE
40 And
41 QUOTE
42 Pfizer Moved ‘at the Speed of Science’
43 Fast-forward to early October 2022, and my claims were officially confirmed during a
44 COVID hearing in the European Parliament. Dutch member Rob Roos questioned Pfizer’s
45 president of international developed markets, Janine Small, about whether Pfizer had in
46 fact tested and confirmed that their mRNA jab would prevent transmission prior to its
47 rollout.
48 As noted by Roos, the entire premise behind COVID shot mandates and vaccine
49 passports was that by taking the shot, you would protect others, as it would prevent
Page 20
1 infection and spread of COVID-19. Small replied:

2 “No. We had to really move at the speed of science to understand what is happening in
3 the market ... and we had to do everything at risk.”2
4 This means the COVID passport was based on a big lie. The only purpose of the COVID
5 passport: forcing people to get vaccinated. I find this shocking — even criminal. ~ Rob
6 Roos, MEP
7 As noted by Roos, “This means the COVID passport was based on a big lie. The only
8 purpose of the COVID passport: forcing people to get vaccinated.” Roos added that
9 he found this deception “shocking — even criminal.”3
10 In the video below, biologist and nurse teacher John Campbell, Ph.D., reviews this
11 growing scandal. He points out that U.K. government officials emphatically assured the
12 public that everything that was normally done in clinical trials for a vaccine was done for
13 the COVID shots. Now we’re told that was not the case after all.
14 END QUOTE
15 And
16 QUOTE
17 Over the past three years, mainstream media have promulgated the lie that the COVID
18 shots will prevent infection and transmission, telling us that anyone who doesn’t get the
19 shot is selfish at best, and at worst, a potential murderer at large. Anyone who refuses
20 poses a serious biomedical threat to society, hence the need for heavy-handedness.
21 Alas, it was all a lie from the start. The frustrating part is that we’ve KNOWN for well
22 over two years that the shots were never tested for transmission interruption, yet everyone
23 in government and media insisted they would do just that.
24 In October 2020, Peter Doshi, associate editor of The BMJ, highlighted the fact that the
25 trials were not designed to reveal whether the vaccines would prevent transmission, which
26 is key if you want to end the pandemic. He wrote:4
27 “None of the trials currently under way are designed to detect a reduction in any serious
28 outcome such as hospital admissions, use of intensive care, or deaths. Nor are the vaccines
29 being studied to determine whether they can interrupt transmission of the virus.”
30 So, by October 2020, at the latest, it was clear that no studies had been done to determine
31 whether the shots actually prevented transmission, which is a prerequisite for the claim that
32 you’ll save the lives of others if you take it.
33 By then, Moderna had also admitted they were not testing its jab’s ability to prevent
34 infection. Tal Zaks, chief medical officer at Moderna, stated that this kind of trial would
35 require testing volunteers twice a week for long periods of time — a strategy he called
36 “operationally untenable.”5
37 So, neither Pfizer nor Moderna had any clue whether their COVID shots would prevent
38 transmission or spread, as that was never tested, yet with the aid of government officials
39 and media, they led the public to believe they would. Below is just one example where
40 Pfizer clearly obfuscated the truth. 6 If stopping transmission was their “highest priority,”
41 why didn’t they test and confirm that their shot was accomplishing this priority?
42
Page 21
1 Similarly, in an Israeli interview7 (below), Bourla stated that “The efficacy of our vaccine
2 in children is 80%.” The reporter asked him to clarify, “Are you talking about efficacy to
3 prevent severe disease or to prevent infection?” and Bourla replied, “To prevent infection.”
4 How could he say that when preventing infection has never been tested? Is that not
5 evidence of fraud, caught on camera?
6 - Pfizer CEO: “The efficacy of our vaccine in children is 80%”
7
8 - Reporter: “Are you talking about efficacy to prevent severe disease or to prevent
9 infection?”
10
11 - Pfizer CEO: “𝗧𝗼 𝗽𝗿𝗲𝘃𝗲𝗻𝘁 𝗶𝗻𝗳𝗲𝗰𝘁𝗶𝗼𝗻”
12
13 Need more evidence of fraud?pic.twitter.com/OsVDmmSVvH
14 — Dr. Eli David (@DrEliDavid) October 18, 2022
15 COVID Shots Have Been Fraudulently Marketed
16 As I stated in February 2021, the shots are a medical fraud. A true vaccine prevents
17 infection; COVID shots don’t. Hence, they’ve also been fraudulently marketed.
18 END QUOTE
19
20 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=s0PYZ-zCzOM
21 Rob Roos asks Pfizer if they knew their vaccine didn't ... - YouTube
22 20 hours ago ... Rob Roos, EU Parliament Member, asks Pfizer Exec, Ms Small, if they knew that their
23 vaccine didn't stop transmission of Covid…
24
25 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J6VbI8gOnUM
26 Viral transmission not tested in Pfizer trials - YouTube
27 11 hours ago ... ... October Dutch MEP Rob Roos 'Was the Pfizer Covid vaccine tested on stopping the
28 transmission of the virus before it entered the market?
29
30 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=noJO5DBe7x0
31 Member of the European Parliament Rob Roos exposes Pfizer
32 2 days ago ... Member of the European Parliament Rob Roos exposes Pfizer ... In COVID hearing, #Pfizer
33 director admits: #vaccine was never tested on preventing ...
34
35 And consider also:
36
37 https://www.theage.com.au/national/victoria/andrews-open-to-doing-a-deal-on-arbitrary-detention-laws-
38 20200923-p55yd7.html
39 Andrews open to doing a deal on arbitrary detention laws - The Age
40 23 Sept 2020 ... Victorian Premier Daniel Andrews has signalled his government is willing to negotiate with
41 crossbench MPs to get a controversial new law ...
42
43 https://www.theage.com.au/politics/victoria/pandemic-declaration-to-end-in-victoria-20221007-p5bo20.html
44 Experts say dropping pandemic declaration is 'an appropriate step'
45 7 Oct 2022 ... Epidemiologists have backed Premier Daniel Andrews' decision to end the pandemic
46 declaration, the legal instrument used to enforce rules ...
47
48 https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-10134531/Daniel-Andrews-pandemic-state-emergency-laws-fine-
49 going-work.html
50 Daniel Andrews pandemic state of emergency laws - Daily Mail
51 27 Oct 2021 ... Daniel Andrews' controversial new laws to manage pandemics that could see rule-breakers
52 fined up to $454,350 or jailed for two years have ...
53
54 https://www.michaelsmithnews.com/2021/11/law-institute-victoria-response-to-daniel-andrews-enabling-
55 act.html
56 Law Institute Victoria response to Daniel Andrews Enabling Act
57 11 Nov 2021 ... The LIV has been working extensively with the relevant LIV legal policy sections, subject
58 matter experts and has considered direct feedback ...
Page 22
1
2 https://www.sbs.com.au/news/article/i-am-sorry-for-what-has-occurred-daniel-andrews-apologises-for-
3 victorias-hotel-quarantine-bungle/27yb964rx
4 Daniel Andrews apologises for Victoria's hotel quarantine bungle
5 25 Sept 2020 ... "I want to make it very clear to each and every member of the Victorian community that I
6 am sorry for what has occurred here," Mr Andrews said.
7
8 https://www.spectator.com.au/2021/10/exclusive-assistant-attorney-general-daniel-andrews-pandemic-bill-
9 must-not-pass/
10 EXCLUSIVE Assistant Attorney General: Daniel Andrews pandemic ...
11 29 Oct 2021 ... Surely this is an excessive way to punish someone for not wearing a mask, or a business that
12 fails to check a person's vaccination status. The ...
13
14 https://www.hrlc.org.au/news/2018/9/6/dangerous-anti-association-laws-pass-lower-house
15 Daniel Andrews' dangerous anti-association laws pass lower house
16 7 Sept 2018 ... The laws will give police excessive powers to issue 'anti-association notices', telling people –
17 including children as young as 14 – who ...
18
19 Not to overlook:
20 https://www.facebook.com/9NewsMelbourne/photos/a.1681866178743703/3023889611208013/?type=3
21 9 News Melbourne, profile picture - Facebook
22 19 Oct 2021 ... Premier Daniel Andrews has issued a warning to unvaccinated Victorians, saying they
23 should brace to be locked out of venues "well and truly ...
24
25 Regarding “unvaccinated Victorians, saying they should brace to be locked out of venues” and
26 this indeed eventuated, such as:
27
28 On 10 August 2020 I was
29  Denied entry into Bunnings warehouse Thomastown
30  I was denied entry into Office work Bundoora
31  I was ordered by the Victorian Police to leave Coles supermarket in Northland (Preston)
32 for not wearing a mask this despite having shown them a medical exemption for wearing
33 a mask.
34
35 With the denial of more than 1 person to do groceries shopping, etc, it resulted that my wife
36 (next month 90) who suffers from heart failure, etc, was not permitted to travel with me. She
37 effectively was under house arrest for a crime of being alive and living in the State of Victoria.
38
39
40
41
42
Page 23
1 This Brett Sutton Chief Health Officer of Victoria (Australia) as I understand it issued mandates
2 without any reliable scientific basis such a:
3
4 * Compulsory mask * Social distancing
5 * Lockdowns * Curfews
6 * QR codes * 5 kilometres travel limit
7 * PCR testing * Ring of steel
8 * RAT testing * Only 1 person per family shopping
9 * Lockouts * Vaccine ID passport, etc, etc.
10
11 All this while Pfizer and Moderna both made clear they never tested if their mRNA could
12 prevent infection and/or transmit it onto others as such the mandates had no scientific validity
13 whatsoever! Well we seem now to have the following as a consequence:
14
15 https://www.brighteon.com/c49e5b6f-6612-411f-ae9e-87b708f164fc
16 Huge Australian Die Off Intensifies: Govt Tries To Conceal MASSIVE &
17 GROWING Death Spike
18
19 As with the child hood vaccines people are sold a dud and as yet to my knowledge no one proved
20 to have isolated and purified using the Koch postulate the alleged SARS-CoV-2 virus!
21 Where was/is Matthew Guy about protecting Victorians against this evil?
22
24 constitution!
25
27

31 END QUOTE 20221110-Mr G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B. to Hon Bruce Atkinson MLC & Ors
32
33 QUOTE 20221111-Mr G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B. to Mark Butler MHaAC & Event201 Mr T Inglesby &
34 C Rivers-Part 2
35 Mark Butler The Minister for Health and Aged Care (Australian date and time) 11-11-2022
36 minister.butler@health.gov.au
37
38 Cc: Mary-Anne Thomas The Minister for Health (Victoria)
39 mary-anne.thomas@parliament.vic.gov.au
40
41 Mr Anthony Carbines, Minister for Police & Ors
42 anthony.carbines@parliament.vic.gov.au, minister.carbines@justice.vic.gov.au
43
45
46 20221111-Mr G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B. toMark Butler The Minister for Health and Aged Care
48
49 COMPLAINT
50 Sir,
51 further to my 20221108 mcomp-0laint I provide this part 2.
52
53 QUOTE

Page 24
1 Previously I Cc’d you copies of my correspondence to Mary-Anne Thomas and Mr

2 Anthony Carbines which refers to my grandson Dion Schorel where as I understand it he
3 ended up with “AUTISM and Echolalia” due to childhood vaccinations required by the
4 State of Victoria.
5 END QUOTE
6
7 As you are the Fe3deral Minister for health I decided to check the internet as to back ground
8 information, which ordinary I never did, and noticed you are a lawyer, meaning that you ought to
9 be well aware that as a “responsible Minister” you can be held legally accountable not only as a
10 Minister but also as a private person where you failed to act where you ought to have acted
11 and/or where you remained silent about criminal conduct that has been going on since you
12 became a “responsible Minister”.
13
14 The Framers of the3 Constitution specifically desired to have a “responsible Minister” whom
15 would be liable for whatever was going on in his Department.
16 The desired so to say a hands-on Minister!
17
18 Hansard 1-3-1898 Constitution Convention Debates
19 QUOTE Sir JOHN DOWNER.-
20 I think we might, on the attempt to found this great Commonwealth, just advance one step, not beyond
21 the substance of the legislation, but beyond the form of the legislation, of the different colonies, and say
22 that there shall be embedded in the Constitution the righteous principle that the Ministers of the
23 Crown and their officials shall be liable for any arbitrary act or wrong they may do, in the same way as
24 any private person would be.
25 END QUOTE
26
27 Let’s see what the Framers of the Constitution stated about the telephone, postal and other
28 services:
29
30
31 Hansard 17-3-1898 Constitution Convention Debates (Official Record of the Debates of the National
33 QUOTE Mr. CARRUTHERS:
34 It is just as important that the Federal Government shall have the care and management of the vehicles which
35 carry human beings and their goods as that it should have the care and [start page 769] management of
36 the vehicles or ways which carry letters and telegrams.
37 END QUOTE
38
39
40 (Writers note: Notice they even refer to “management of the vehicles” not just photo
41 opportunities for a Minister!)
42
43 And:
44 Hansard 17-3-1898 Constitution Convention Debates (Official Record of the Debates of the National
46 QUOTE Mr. CARRUTHERS:
47 If you give over the telegraph and postal business you thereby hand to the custody of the Federal Government
48 all the local appointments-the appointing of the postmasters, clerks, and other officers, who do not do
49 national, but the purest local business; and you at once raise up a large army of civil servants , the
50 influence of which we want to dissociate from our national life
51 END QUOTE
52
53 (Writers note: Notice they refer to appointments of officers etc and “large army of civil servants”
54 clearly this relates to Commonwealth Management, not some private company)
55
Page 25
1 This legal principle doesn’t just apply to a Minister regarding telecommunication but to any
2 Minister regarding his Department.
3
4 Obviously you may argue that what was done by the former Minister for Health Greg Hunt was
5 beyond your control, just the question then is where you then the Shadow Minister for health and
6 what did you do to prevent any misuse/abuse of powers by Greg Hunt and others?
7
9 Convention)
10 QUOTE
11 Mr. ISAACS.-We want a people's Constitution, not a lawyers' Constitution.
12 END QUOTE
13
14 HANSARD18-2-1898 Constitution Convention Debates (Official Record of the Debates of the National
16 QUOTE Mr. ISAACS.-
17 The right of a citizen of this great country, protected by the implied guarantees of its Constitution,
18 END QUOTE
19
21 QUOTE
22 Mr. BARTON.- Of course it will be argued that this Constitution will have been made by the Parliament of
23 the United Kingdom. That will be true in one sense, but not true in effect, because the provisions of this
24 Constitution, the principles which it embodies, and the details of enactment by which those principles
25 are enforced, will all have been the work of Australians.
26 END QUOTE
27
28 The following will also make clear that the Framers of the Constitution intended to have CIVIL
29 RIGHTS and LIBERTIES principles embedded in the Constitution;
30 HANSARD 17-3-1898 Constitution Convention Debates (Official Record of the Debates of the National
32 QUOTE Mr. CLARK.-
33 the protection of certain fundamental rights and liberties which every individual citizen is entitled to
34 claim that the federal government shall take under its protection and secure to him.
35 END QUOTE
36
38 QUOTE
39 Mr. HIGGINS.-Suppose the sentry is asleep, or is in the swim with the other power?
40
41 Mr. GORDON.-There will be more than one sentry. In the case of a federal law,
42 every member of a state Parliament will be a sentry, and, every constituent of a state
43 Parliament will be a sentry.
44 As regards a law passed by a state, every man in the Federal Parliament will be a
45 sentry, and the whole constituency behind the Federal Parliament will be a sentry.
46 END QUOTE
47
48 When it became known that Scott Morrison PM had the Commonwealth entering some secret
49 contract with Pfizer and/or others did you then take appropriate action to ensure that any contract
50 was within the rule of law? If not why not?
51
52 As Shadow Minister did you bother at all to consider the dangers of any vaccinations and if the
53 so called COVID-19 vaccinations were really vaccinations and not merely some gene therapy
54 under the falsehood of being vaccinations?
55
56 The TGA as I understand it issued directions to prevent Invermectin to be available as was
57 which I understand was for the sake of “government policy” to prevent people to use
Page 26
1 Invermectin against a disease going on claimed to be COVID-19 and so by this

2 directly/indirectly placed the health and wellbeing and also the lives of Australians at risk?
3
4 I understand that recently the TGA has issued regulations as to the sale of Panadol kind of tablets
5 (or something like that) allegedly restricting the sale to a mere two packets. While this may be
6 deemed to be as a safeguard where people may purchase too many and become harmed, this kind
7 of concern is not at all reflected when it comes to the so called COVID-19 alleged vaccines.
8 Indeed, it appears to me that so to say the TGA is bending backwards to make sure that
9 maximum harm eventuates against Australians. While the TGA provided “provisional approval”
10 for “clinical trials” which excludes “commercial pharmaceutical products to be used nevertheless
11 the TGA has knowingly allowed the misuse and abuse of the clinical trials to coerce Australians
12 to be jabbed without any proper disclosure as to the harm it may inflict upon a person being
13 jabbed. In my own research for the last nearly 3 years I have discovered that Pfizer was make
14 false and misleading claims about the so called vaccines preventing infections, etc (such as by
15 Pfizer CEO Bourla) this even so recently Pfizer director Janine Small when questioned in the
16 European Parliament by Member Rob Roos she admitted that Pfizer never tested if the product
17 prevented any infection or transmission to other because of the “Speed of science”. I wonder
18 what this means as unconstitutionally the Federal Government as well as other Australian
19 Government interfered with our constitutional rights to communicate freely with one another and
20 Members of Parliament and even deny the medical profession to be permitted to express any
21 views contrary to the government’s perverted mantras/propaganda.
22
23 HANSARD 17-3-1898 Constitution Convention Debates (Official Record of the Debates of the National
25 QUOTE Mr. DEAKIN.-
26 What a charter of liberty is embraced within this Bill-of political liberty and religious liberty-the liberty and
27 the means to achieve all to which men in these days can reasonably aspire. A charter of liberty is enshrined in
28 this Constitution, which is also a charter of peace-of peace, order, and good government for the whole of the
29 peoples whom it will embrace and unite.
30 END QUOTE
31 And
33 QUOTE
34 Mr. SYMON (South Australia).- We who are assembled in this Convention are about to commit to the
35 people of Australia a new charter of union and liberty; we are about to commit this new Magna Charta
36 for their acceptance and confirmation, and I can conceive of nothing of greater magnitude in the whole
37 history of the peoples of the world than this question upon which we are about to invite the peoples of
38 Australia to vote. The Great Charter was wrung by the barons of England from a reluctant king. This new
39 charter is to be given by the people of Australia to themselves.
40 END QUOTE
41
42 We now have the Queensland Parliament allegedly having legislated that doctors cannot state
43 anything to a patient that conflicts with the government mantra. Just that as the doctors charge
44 Medicare for their services rendered then I view Queensland Parliament cannot interfere with the
45 right of the medical profession.
46 It should be also understood that any corporation, etc, that is registered within the provisions of
47 the Commonwealth of Australia Constitution Act 1900 (UK) cannot violate any constitutional
48 rights of citizens/patients. Hence when Qantas CEO dictated that passengers were to wear a
49 mask then I view this should have been objected by the Federal government as it was so to say
50 unlawful medical discrimination. Surely we cannot have that Qantas or any other business
51 instead of demanding a traveller to wear a mask involving self-harm by preventing the person to
Page 27
1 be able to have normal air intake, etc, next might demand a traveller to cut off a finger or other
2 self-harm to be inflicted?
3
4 Obviously the question is what did you do when you were appointed by the Governor-General to
5 be the Minister for health to stop any unconstitutional/unlawful conduct? Did you immediately
6 order the TGA to stop any further vaccinations/jabbing to proceed u8sing unlawful commercial
7 items? Did you call TGA John Skerritt in to demand he explains why he allows vails to be used
8 that contained ingredients not listed on the vails but can have deadly effects when the content is
9 injected into a person? Did you hold the medical board, ATAGI, Department of Health
10 accountable for their misleading/disinformation/fraudulent claims to coerce citizens in being
11 jabbed? Did you demand that all and any unlawful bioweapon jabbing (vaccinations) were to be
12 stopped immediately? Did you order the “No Jab, No Pay” unconstitutional vaccinations to be
13 stopped the day you were appointed to be Minister for health? Did you order all and any
14 vaccinations regarding the elderly in care and hospital facilities not to be jabbed unless special
15 approval was obtained from you to ensure that those residents/patients were not plainly be
16 murdered for the sake of such care facility/hospital, etc, to make big bucks?
17
18 Did you immediately remove Jane Halton from the COVID-19 committee AS TO STOP ANY
19 CONFLICT OF INTEREST? Did you also remove any ATAGI board member who had a
20 conflict of interest, such as the person working for the Peter Doherty Institute? Did you bother to
21 order an immediate investigation why reportedly Peter Doherty Institute, CSIRO and others were
22 involved in gain-of-function research which I understand was without lawful authority, and so
23 with Ukraine bio weapons research?
24 I could add hundreds of pages for I view that to keep it brief (for this part 2) may be already
25 plenty for you to immediately (not in years to come) to attend to.
26
27 I have only watched 2 short videos about EVENT 201 that allegedly took place in October 2019.
28 I noticed that they commenced about some virus going on and then many deaths were expected.
29
30 Video “Highlights Reel- Event 201”
31
32
33
Page 28
1
2 Because I was in management involving also quality control, production planning, etc, it seemed
3 to me very strange that the attention was upon preventing disinformation/misinformation and
4 needing to get the media on side (Jane Halton) rather than to have an open line of discussion as
5 that really is needed if “science” is to develop as details become available. Stiffening ot
6 preventing communication is to prevent “science” to update itself. It appeared to me that the
7 EVENT 201 was likely very poorly planned and executed or it was deliberately organised to use
8 an already ongoing disease to be used for the maximum to essentially harm the world population.
9
10 While the EVENT 201 chart shows a start of the pretended disease about August 9 that was
11 about the time the research at the Forth Derick laboratory was shut down due to a person having
12 died already and a clean-up was needed. Actually just over 100 years ago then Fort Detrick was
13 also the ground zero from where the misnamed “Spanish Flu” eventuated.
14 Again, I only watched a small part that was on the video, and not the whole EVENT 201 but I
15 gained the impression it was not at all about seeking to avoid a health disaster. After all I
16 couldn’t detect any attention to having someone placed in a position to check items needed to
17 combat any disease other than that it should be attended as a supply system but not as to say
18 mask being appropriate for any airborne disease, etc. Neither was there in my view no real
19 attention to ensure a proper system that would ensure that all jurisdictions would have the same
20 system to evaluate any person and a worldwide system for recording and not some add hock
21 system where so to say the goal post was changing all the time. We had/have that Pfizer is
22 selling the so called COVID vaccines to what it desires and so all this talk during EVENT 201
23 seems to have nowhere when it came to the supply chain. In a way it appears to me it was for the
24 better for certain countries as they had a low vaccination rate and now have a low if any excess
25 overall death rate.
26
27 Here we had the CDC (USA) being a private corporation as G.W. Bush then president of the
28 USA in 1991 made clear was to look after the interest of its sponsors (pharmaceutical
29 companies, Bill Gates and the likes) and its employees were not federal employees. So, why on
30 earth was the CDC (essentially some advertising agency for the sponsors) dictating what hospital
31 and others had to follow as to its directive? It denied the usage of HCQ and Invermectin so that a
32 more dangerous pharmaceutical product could be used that I understand was effectively killing
33 patients. Then again the hospitals, etc, were making big buck from the alleged COVID deaths.
34
35 In my view EVENT 201 appeared rathe to ensure that the DEPOPULATION was being set in
36 train to get governments around the world following the script rather than any sensible conduct.
37 After all where Pfizer specified that the injection was to be in the muscle and not in the
38 bloodstream then surely the attention ought to have been directed that as in Taiwan one must
39 aspirate to check any blood being drawen and if not then only inject the substance. Also, why on
40 earth having a 14 day or something longer as a gap after the jabbing where most deaths occurred
41 within about 48 hours?
42
43 Why also did the Federal government not step in to prevent Bret hazard the Minister for health
44 (NSW) from having students injected in some stadium? After all, if it was relating to a “man-
45 kind” disease then it was exclusively within the Commonwealth powers and then the
46 Commonwealth would needed to have court order to have any person jabbed against his/her
47 desire.
48
49 Why is it that I can do research about the vaccines scam and harm to the many while
50 Victorian Leader of the Opposition Matthew Guy somehow cannot manage to hold
51 Premier Daniel Accountable. I have included my comments regarding the 2013
Page 29
1 accident involving a child cyclist whom I view had the right of way and charges
2 should have been pursued against Catharine Andrews. As it ordinary applicable to
3 other Victorians.
4 You can download the document from:
5 https://www.scribd.com/document/606514969/20221110-Mr-G-H-Schorel-Hlavka-O-W-B-to-Hon-
6 Bruce-Atkinson-MLC-Ors
7
8 This document from page 8 onwards set out about the increase of harm when children are
9 jabbed/vaccinated. I have for some time urged to have a moratorium on all and any vaccinations
10 and this subject to proper assessment is any is beneficially or not. After all with ongoing
11 exposures of the harm from the so called COVID-19 vaccines and also of the childhood
12 vaccinations there can be no justification to allow any of it to continue.
13
14 Obviously I am well aware that you may simply blatantly disregard to address matters
15 appropriately and well you then one day may just discover (even of long left the portfolio) that
16 you can be held personally accountable by the courts.
17
18 When I commenced my initial complaint on 8 April 2020 against the mandates with the
19 Victorian Ombudsman I all along expected she, so to say, would try to swipe it under the carpet.
20 The same with my complaint to the Victorian Human Rights Commissioner. Both seem to be
21 more interested in following “Government policy” as TGA John Skerritt also made clear,
22 regardless how unconstitutional/unlawful it might be.
23
24 My grandson Dion Schorel has as I understand it been forced to comply with the
25 unconstitutional/unlawful mandates and in particular considering that he now has “AUTISM and
26 Echolalia” health problems only an utter fool would disregard to act appropriately.
27 If you were to have any intent to act appropriate then why not check out my publications at my
28 “inspectorrikati” Scribd blog that deals extensively with matters such as the eggs in the vials,
29 the clotting resulting from it, etc. Don’t worry I do not charge for anyone to access this and/or to
30 download the documentation..
31
32 Say that the worst was to eventuate and Dion was to die due to what was injected into him. A
33 coroner would then have to investigate his death and obviously why you failed to take
34 appropriate action to seek to avoid this. After all, I gave you ample of information that common
35 sense alone would alert you to better attend to matters very carefully and not to ignore it all.
36 Therefore doing a D-dimer test and any other appropriate medical evaluation should have been
37 all along the priority to avoid any nasty health issues to eventuate.
38 Dion should have been immediately returned to his father, my son Mark Schorel, and every
39 assistance be provided to ensure that Dion has not suffered further harm since kidnapped from
40 his father’s care. Every day to delay Dion’s return to his father only needlessly have you with
41 added legal responsibilities you could do well without.
42
44 QUOTE
45 Mr. MCMILLAN.-We have the ablest lawyers divided on this question, and what is the layman to do?
46 END QUOTE
47
49 QUOTE
50 Mr. TRENWITH.-And yet this clause is throwing legislation into the hands of those
51 people who cannot agree.
52 MR. REID.-The lawyers.
Page 30
1 Mr. MCMILLAN.-The lawyers?

2 Mr. TRENWITH.-Yes, thrusting it on them.
3 Mr. MCMILLAN.-That is one of those commonplaces which are always used. There is
4 no clause or sub-clause of any Bill in the world, even if it were framed by an angel from
5 Heaven, that would not be the subject of litigation.
6 Dr. COCKBURN.-The disagreement is not legal, but constitutional.
7 Sir EDWARD BRADDON.-You do not got lawyers from Heaven.
8 Mr. ISAACS.-No, lawyers are sent there; they are not drawn from there.
9 Mr. MCMILLAN.-Looking at the clause from a common-sense point of view, are the
10 provisions a vital condition of the Constitution?
11 END QUOTE
12
14 QUOTE
15 Mr. HIGGINS (Victoria).-I should like to add my protest against this new clause. I am bound to say
16 something, because the honorable member (Mr. Gordon) says it is only the conservative and timid lawyers
17 who would venture to oppose this proposal.
18 Mr. GORDON.-I did not say that. I said as a rule the legal profession is, according to Herbert Spencer, a
19 timid and conservative class.
20 Mr. HIGGINS.-That may be so, and if the honorable member says he did not make that statement it is all
21 right. Anyhow, I thought he said that only conservative and timid lawyers would oppose this clause. There is
22 no doubt the intention of the honorable member is excellent. He wants to diminish litigation. If he can show
23 that this will diminish litigation to any material extent, and, at the same time, will not involve us in a great
24 many dangers to our liberties, I will go with him, but he has not shown anything of the sort. As Mr. Wise has
25 shown, it will throw an unpopular minority into the power of a chance Ministry of the day. We must see to-
26 day that the rights of individuals, even unpopular individuals, are preserved in the Constitution. I think
27 Sir John Forrest said that I personally had not got sufficient respect for the rights of individuals.
28 END QUOTE
29
30 As a (now retired) professional advocate I have had legal opponents who practiced their
31 profession for decades and nevertheless I defeated them. The Commonwealth charged me
32 regarding 2001 federal election for “FAILING TO VOTE” and likewise so regarding the 2004
33 federal election and representing myself defeated the Commonwealth in both cases, relying also
34 upon my constitutional rights. As such, I do not care if the opponent t is a lawyer who has
35 practiced decades in the courts because I have proved to be able to defeat them time and time
36 again.
37
38 I publish my writings so that if any other person has suffered harm and/or a family member they
39 may be able to use my writing that you were notified/alerted to certain issues and if you failed to
40 act in a responsible manner then well cop the legal consequences is what I would say!
41
42 During nearly 3 years of mandates, etc, I became aware that hospital ceo’s seems to be more
43 interested to follow the demands of pharmaceutical companies and in the process deny proper
44 medical care to patients. Well THAT MUST STOP! We cannot have that some foreign
45 company dictates the kind of health service, if any at all, is to be provided. A competent Minister
46 for health would immediately take action to prevent this to ever happen again!
47
49 constitution!
50
52

Page 31

4 END QUOTE 20221111-Mr G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B. to Mark Butler MHaAC & Event201 Mr T
5 Inglesby & C Rivers-Part 2
6
7 QUOTE 20200503-PRESS RELEASE Mr G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B. ISSUE – Misnaming a disease can
8 have deadly consequences
9 20200503-PRESS RELEASE Mr G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B. ISSUE –
10 Misnaming a disease can have deadly consequences
11
12 As a CONSTITUTIONALIST my concern is the true meaning and application of the constitution.
13
14 * Gerrit, wouldn’t that misnaming be avoided by the medical profession?
15
16 **#** INSPECTOR-RIKATI®, considering that doctors are already expressing their concerns,
17 such as in
18 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QWaq8HoEROU&list=PLrEvQjDXMnnhRkIfAYP8y9nM
19 MY96pD6nF&index=38&t=0s
20 "FROM NYC DOC_ SHOULD COVID-19 VENTILATOR PROTOCALS BE CHANGED!!!" and
21 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k9GYTc53r2o&list=PLrEvQjDXMnnhRkIfAYP8y9nMMY
22 96pD6nF&index=37&t=0s "FROM NYC ICU_ DOES COVID-19 REALLY CAUSE ARDS__!!" then it
23 surely is a deadly issue.
24 When patients are killed because of improper usage of the ventilator because they cannot handle
25 the pressure that the ventilator is causing and it needs to be reprogrammed to suit the particular
26 patient then surely it underlines that there has been a gross failure to appropriately prepare for
27 this so called pandemic.
28
29 https://www.msn.com/en-au/news/coronavirus/five-nuns-die-from-covid-19-in-the-space-of-three-weeks-after-
30 virus-sweeps-through-their-milwaukee-convent/ar-BB13vw2y?ocid=spartandhp
31 Five nuns die from COVID-19 in the space of three weeks after virus sweeps through their Milwaukee convent
32 QUOTE
33 Sisters Mary Collins, 95, Marie Skender, 83, Mary Sherburne, 99, Annelda Holtkamp, 102, and Bernadette Kelter, 88, all resided at Our Lady of
34 the Angels in Greenfield, Milwaukee - an assisted living facility for clergy suffering from memory loss.
35 Convent staff have been left devastated by the deaths, and say they are reflective of the incredible challenges that nurs ing homes and other aged
36 care facilities face in the midst of the COVID-19 pandemic.
37 Our Lady of the Angels Convent suspended all communal activities and enforced social distancing protocols in early March - long before it was
38 mandatory. They do not know how the virus spread the facility, and all five nuns only tested positive to COVID-19 posthumously.
39 On April 6, Sister Mary Collins was the first nun at the convent to pass away - just three days after she developed a mild cough.
40 END QUOTE
41
42 Obviously to die “from” or “with” a particular disease is not the same.
43
44 Dr Yuvabharat BNYS, PG (PAHM) UK makes it very clear:
45
46
47 WORLD'S GREATEST HOAX Revealed ! ~YOU CANNOT SPREAD THE C _VIRUS_ FROM PERSON
48 TO PERSON
49
50
51 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JtZGCpnTNPs&feature=youtu.be&fbclid=IwAR0Zbx2CIO
52 OAD1dCSgyBgWBX45tasW9kplQvrOJXJzJUuxGFqSe235Zr22M&app=desktop
53 “The End Game” (34 minutes video)
54

Page 32
1 YouTube response” This video has been removed for violating YouTube’s Community
2 Guidelines.
3
4 If the following video is correct then it may explain why in the past so often billions of dollars
5 were granted for research but no vaccine was developed!
6
7 US Doctor_ How can you make a vaccine for something never proven to exist_ A must-
8 watch
9
10 https://www.msn.com/en-au/news/australia/why-do-coronavirus-sceptics-and-deniers-continue-
11 to-downplay-the-disease/ar-BB13wqvw?ocid=spartandhp
12 Why do coronavirus sceptics and deniers continue to downplay the disease?
13 Well I posted my response:
14 QUOTE
15 Anyone who were to check out my writings at www.scribd.com/inspectorrikati would have
16 to question what really is going on. While people are falling ill and many die, also due to
17 incompetence using ventilators not programmed properly for a particular patient, this so
18 called "VIRUS" should be referred to as to what it really is. As I have extensively exposed
19 people call "Australian citizenship" to be "Australian nationality" this even so it is not and
20 cannot be but is simply drummed into them. As such, calling some illness a "virus" when it
21 might be not at all, then those pushing their mantra's are the very people not willing to
22 accept reality. I have posted numerous links in my writings where people interested in
23 discovering the truth can check out the video's. They are not video's I had any part in
24 creating! It is very troubling that there are people who are seeking to have their 15 minutes
25 of fame by attacking others about something they may not themselves have a clue about
26 what it actually is about. Blaming people as "racist" may just underline their absurd
27 conduct. I for one have spoken out about the gross injustice inflicted by the (Australian)
28 Federal Government in its LOCKDOWNS and by this refusing to provide the same
29 services and support to the 457 visa holders as any other taxpayer. This is not being a
30 "racist" rather to the contrary making clear we should accept that the 457 visa holders are
31 entitled to their human and other constitutional/legal rights as others. I for one have spend
32 months researching details and constantly refer to the video's that are available on the
33 Internet, including their links. As such, the issue I pursue is the truth, and that I view
34 requires a ROYAL COMMISSION. We have politicians claiming that it is all about
35 protecting the "vulnerable" but reality is that their conduct is anything but to do that. And
36 then we have the Queensland Premier faking an immunization. Ordinary my wife (87)
37 would attend to out patient to see a specialist and then is given prescriptions for her
38 medications. Now the consultation was to be by telephone and more than 3 weeks later she
39 still have not received the prescriptions, despite many email asking for them. Is this how
40 you claim to look after the "vulnerable" when you deny the scripts for the medications?
41 We are bombarded about how many people purportedly died because of COVID-19 but
42 there are still reports that the testing is unreliable. That a coroner made clear she is
43 instructed to add the code for COVID-19 regardless if the patients actually had it. As such,
44 let us be clear about it, that the death toll is manipulated to pretend a high COVID-19 death
45 toll when many if not most may have died due to other causes. To misuse the dead toll
46 merely so hospitals can be paid more monies I view is absurd. And when you got groups of
47 doctors and nurses at hospitals doing dancing because there are no patients then ask where
48 are all the patients who died? No matter what you may call the spread of an illness it never
49 should permit governments to blatantly ignore the rule of law. Once you accept them to do
50 so then they will by increments do more and more. As for "University of Queensland
51 virologist Ian Mackay" let him check out https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=t0uemkf9c88

Page 33
1 "Do Viruses Exist" and consider how over hundreds of years those in power slaughtered
2 people using an excuse to justify it. How he claims there is a "virus" to disprove what the
3 video presents! We may find that this purported COVID-19 really never was a "virus" but
4 wrongly labelled as such and that government overreacted as they may never have done so
5 if it had been referred to as a flu. And to show how irresponsible the Federal Government
6 has been is to consider that Minister for Health responsible for QUARANTINE, PORTS
7 and ALIENS, was MISSING IN ACTION when it came to the Ruby Princess cruise ship
8 and its about 2,700 passengers and crew, resulting in as I understand it dozens of death.
9 Would this gigantic hysteria have existed if instead of claiming it to be a virus it was
10 referred to as being a "flu"? Perhaps ask "University of Sydney politics professor John
11 Keane " and "University of Adelaide political expert Carol Johnson" if they got any clue
12 what "citizens" means as stated in S44 of the constitution and there is no such
13 constitutional meaning as "Australian Citizenship" being a nationality! The worst thing we
14 can do is to give the illness a label and then based any medical treatment using this by this
15 actually endangering the lives of those who fell ill!
16 check out also
17 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QWaq8HoEROU&list=PLrEvQjDXMnnhRkIfAYP8y
18 9nMMY96pD6nF&index=38&t=0s
19 "FROM NYC DOC_ SHOULD COVID-19 VENTILATOR PROTOCALS BE
20 CHANGED!!!" and
21 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k9GYTc53r2o&list=PLrEvQjDXMnnhRkIfAYP8y9n
22 MMY96pD6nF&index=37&t=0s "FROM NYC ICU_ DOES COVID-19 REALLY
23 CAUSE ARDS__!!"
24 if we are really causing the death of patients because mislabelling it as a "virus" instead of
25 what it really is then John Keane, Carol Johnson and Ian Mackay rather then to criticise
26 the critics ought to hand their head in shame not to be open minded and being part of the
27 FAKE NEWS brigade.
28 Labelling a person "racist" or a "bigot" merely because you may not agree with their
29 expressed views may just being outing yourself as one.
30 END QUOTE
31
32 Let us also consider:
33 https://www.msn.com/en-au/news/coronavirus/thousands-of-healthcare-workers-are-laid-off-or-furloughed-as-
34 coronavirus-spreads/ar-BB13vRJ7?ocid=spartandhp
35 Thousands of healthcare workers are laid off or furloughed as coronavirus spreads
36 QUOTE
37 Isham noted the irony in state leaders summoning thousands of health workers to volunteer
38 on the front lines against COVID-19 while huge numbers were losing their jobs. In some
39 hospitals, the same nurses asked to prepare to pitch in at departments treating COVID-19
40 patients are now facing cuts.
41 "It's embarrassing," Isham said. "Everyone was like, 'Come out of the woodwork: If you
42 haven't finished nursing school, we need you, and if you're retired we need you,' and we're
43 like, 'We're laid off.'"
44 END QUOTE
45
49 QUOTE
50 The hospital has yet to admit a single COVID-19 patient, said spokeswoman Pamela Floyd.
51 END QUOTE
52

Page 34
1 When you have a large hospital that ordinary has an about 8billion dollars turnover not even
2 having a single covid-19 patient then surely there is something drastically wrong as to the
3 reporting of COVID-19 death versus what actually is in hospitals. As the coroner Annie Bukacek
4 made known 60% of people are dying in hospitals and well if there are no COVID-19 patients in
5 this hospital then where are they all dying?
6
7 https://www.bitchute.com/video/gDd8cQkohNJE/ &
8 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Rwl__8rivG8
9 Montana physician Dr. Annie Bukacek discusses how COVID 19 death certificates are
10 being manipulated
11
12 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dx-
13 EceW8R2k&list=PLrEvQjDXMnnhRkIfAYP8y9nMMY96pD6nF&index=41&t=0s
14 Dr Annie Bukacek on Media Fear-mongering & Coronavirus Deaths
15
16 Let use an example: If a patient is treated for a appendix problem not because the patient has
17 such a problem but in fact has a Heart Failure problem then surely operating on this person to
18 remove an appendix even so there is nothing wrong with it may end up being claimed that the
19 operation was successful in removing the appendix but the patient died because of heart Failure
20 that was not at all addressed when needed.
21 .
22 Now consider that it is claimed that there is no such thing as a “virus” but it is some other
23 disease, then if you going to treat the person for a “virus” and not for the actual disease then the
24 patient likely can die because of the incorrect treatment provided. Hence, it is essential not to
25 misdiagnose the disease to avoid applying the wrong treatment.
26
27 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=t0uemkf9c88
28 Do Viruses Exist (Stefan Lanka Ph.D Microbiologist/Virologist)
29
30 If for example the so called COVID-19 is perhaps a “flu” then the panic caused around the world
31 with its severe consequences could have been avoided if we just had “leaders” who would bother
32 to check and verify details.
33
34 https://www.msn.com/en-au/news/world/the-coronavirus-pandemic-could-last-up-to-2-years-according-to-
35 us-experts-they-predict-we-may-see-a-2nd-larger-wave-of-infections-this-fall/ar-
36 BB13x2FV?ocid=spartandhp
37 The coronavirus pandemic could last up to 2 years, according to US experts. They predict we may see a 2nd,
38 larger wave of infections this fall.
39
40 We should get away from fear mongering and address the real disease.
41 We can also then avoid the economical and other hardships.
42 .
46 QUOTE
47 Melnick estimated that California hospitals typically generate $8 billion in revenue
48 monthly, but in the first month of the pandemic, they earned about $6 billion. Those losses
49 were compounded by unexpected expenses to prepare for a surge, such as bringing in extra
50 staffing and renting hotel rooms for doctors treating COVID-19 patients, he said.
51 END QUOTE
52
53 Here we had hospitals gearing up for some COVID-19 virus and yet it didn’t really materialize.
54 However, having booked hotels, etc, is now a financial burden that could have been avoided.
55
Page 35
1 People are loosing their ability to work and for what? For some mirage?
2
3 How can you claim to protect the “vulnerable” when you cannot even bother to check out what it
4 is really about?
5 .
6 It really is a déjà vu of the WMD (Weapons of Mass Destruction) when mass murder was waged
7 on the basis of WMD’s that never materialized.
8 Déjà vu - Wikipedia
9 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/D%C3%A9j%C3%A0_vu
10 Déjà vu is the feeling that one has lived through the present situation before. The phrase ...
11 Deja vous is a pun on the English pronunciation of déjà vu.
12
13 In my view, what should have been done was to have acted responsible and first of all make sure
14 that what was claimed to be some Novel Coronavirus actually was a “virus” and not a fiction of
15 the imagination.
16 I long ago was reading where a person was advised by a doctor needing to have his appendix to
17 be removed because it was infected when the person made clear his appendix was removed
18 decades ago. As such, doctors and other specialist can make wrong assessments.
19 If therefore the disease is not a “virus” but something else then to mount some war against an
20 invisible disease may just be to lose the war and causing untold deaths that could have likely
21 been avoided. As the NYC doctor made clear the ventilators were not programmed for the
22 patients special needs. Clearly it was not some “virus” but something else misnamed as a “virus”
23 and hence the wrong medical treatment was given with up to 88% of patients resulting to die.
24
25 https://www.msn.com/en-au/news/australia/how-angela-merkels-science-background-gives-her-an-edge-against-
26 coronavirus-in-germany/ar-BB13wawf?ocid=spartandhp
27 How Angela Merkel's science background gives her an edge against coronavirus in
28 Germany
29 QUOTE
30 At a press conference this month, Ms Merkel — who has a doctorate in quantum chemistry
31 — didn't need a medical officer or chief scientist to communicate the mathematical
32 modelling.
33 END QUOTE
34 Well, if she names it a “VIRUS” then no matter her training and experiences she appears to me
35 not to know what she is talking about. In my view “Stefan Lanka Ph.D Microbiologist/
36 Virologist” appeared to know what he was talking about. This also because I watched many
37 other videos of experts making similar claims. Let us be clear I am not disputing people are
38 dying but rather that I view there is a gross deception in what we are dealing with and in the
39 process more than likely people die because they are not treated for what they actually suffer
40 from. We also have the claim:
41 https://www.msn.com/en-au/news/world/lockdowns-save-lives-the-evidence-is-clear-around-the-world/ar-
42 BB13vG2a?ocid=spartandhp
43 Lockdowns save lives. The evidence is clear around the world.
44
45 Well, this means that whenever there is a flu or cold or similar outbreak then a LOCKDOWN
46 somehow could be justified? I do not think so. It would destroy society as we know it. We have
47 to live with the fact that epidemics of all kinds will and do eventuate but we need to be better
48 prepared for it. Sowing panic and hardship is not the way to go!
49 If health workers are in fact bringing the disease to work, such as in a nursing home, then having
50 mislabeled the disease might be part of the problem. What if the disease turn out to be some
51 airborne flu? Then are we to close down even supermarkets and let people starve to dead?
52 What if the 5G telecommunication system plays a part in it all that it causes a weakness of the
53 immune system? After all, our bodies cannot operate without electricity as our brains uses this
Page 36
1 also. This is why the advance in disabled people using their brain to communicate with a
2 computer for typing, etc.
3 We had all those experts claiming “Global Warming” and even former vice president Al Gore
4 that the Australian rivers would be dry, etc. Well clearly this were false claims. Todays scientist
5 will make claims and tomorrows scientist will prove it to be different. As such. science is always
6 evolving to whatever might become available in details in the future. Electron microscopes as I
7 understand it are by far advance to those used say 100 years ago but nevertheless cannot observe
8 a living tissue because it would simply kill it from the start. Meaning that all those computer
9 generated images purportedly showing “viruses” moving about may just be ignored.
10 If indeed this so called COVID-19 is a flu or similar to it, then in my view many in the medical
11 profession may have operated as charlatans. And, obviously the chemical/pharmaceutical
12 companies prefer to have this kind of disaster going on where it is in their financial interest to be
13 so. Let us not ignore how people with HIV, at least as I understand it, were let to suffer and even
14 to die. Blaming the homosexual community when as it now appears one can possibly produce
15 the same by stress, etc.
16 Are we now going to get ongoing LOCKDOWNS whenever there is a flu season?
17 Why is it that reportedly despite 91% of the people vaccinated still are getting the flu and even
18 die from it? And this where the flu immunization actually is against 4 different kinds of flu.
19 Is “Stefan Lanka Ph.D Microbiologist/Virologist” right that the flu immunization actually is
20 harmful to the body? What if because of the injection the body overproduces antigens and by this
21 causes more harm than good?
22 If one watch the start of https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=t0uemkf9c88 “Do Viruses Exist” then it
23 shows how children so to say living of the land have better teeth then city children using
24 fluoridation in their drink water. This may explain that the more we so to say place children in
25 glass houses (Bubble) for hygienic reasons the more harmful we can doing so.
26
27 Five nuns die from COVID-19 in the space of three weeks after virus sweeps through their
28 Milwaukee convent
29
30 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pVUn9I_NlyE&list=PLrEvQjDXMnnhRkIfAYP8y9nMMY96pD6nF&i
31 ndex=31&t=0s
32 “Must eradicate the babyboomers”
33
34 Top doctor’s chilling claim: The NHS kills off 130,000 patients every year.
35 and
36 Doctors admits starving and dehydrating ten babies to death in natal unit.
37
38 Let us not have illusions about doctors are all concerned for the health and wellbeing of their
39 patients, because it appears to me that the inducement of monies to kill of patients is by many
40 their priority. Let us avoid to so to say throw out the baby with the bath water.
41 END QUOTE 20200503-PRESS RELEASE Mr G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B. ISSUE – Misnaming a disease
42 can have deadly consequences
43
44
45 QUOTE 20200510-PRESS RELEASE Mr G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B. ISSUE – Why Cedar Meats, the
46 Victorian abattoir outbreak could eventuate in other states also
47
49 BREAKING NEWS-Allegedly FLU VACCINATION contains CORONAVIRUS and H1N1
50 QUOTE PRESS RELEASE
51 **#** Actually I also included in my supplement submission to “The Special Commission of
52 Inquiry into the Ruby Princess”
53 QUOTE

Page 37
1 I below include an email received on 7-5-2020 which indicates that on 21 January 2020
2 (Scientist Shi Zhengli reportedly developed the coronavirus at the Wuhan Institute of
3 Virology, Wuhan P4 LAB (filed a Chinese Patent on 21 January 2020, Use of Anti-2019
4 Novel Coronavirus)) a Patent was applied for. As such, to be able to obtain a Patent it
5 cannot be a natural virus but needs to be a “man-made” virus. While the email doesn’t
6 refer to 5G nevertheless it should be considered if this also has reference to weaken the
7 immune system to enable the virus to cause the harm. It also means that likely many years
8 were involved in creating this “virus” called COVID-19, and as such, it may have been
9 experimented with in the past to see how people might have reacted at that time to possibly
10 improve it lethal affect. One also has to consider the fact that the Chinese Government
11 within about 7 days build a special hospital and then in 10 days build another hospital. This
12 may indicate that the Chinese Government was all along aware of there being a deadly
13 disease going on. This also as to plan and pre-fabricate what is needed to build hospitals
14 surely can take a considerable time involving engineers to work out details as well as
15 design the hospitals and have all contractors and material needed available. One doesn’t
16 just overnight draft such elaborate plans.
17 END QUOTE
18 END QUOTE PRESS RELEASE
19
20 In my view the following sets out what is done to seek to prevent importation of the disease:
21 https://www.msn.com/en-au/news/australia/more-than-70-tonnes-flown-into-australia-on-infamous-flight-
22 from-chinese-coronavirus-epicentre-wuhan-is-sitting-in-a-warehouse-and-still-hasnt-cleared-customs/ar-
23 BB13OMpr?ocid=spartandhp
24 More than 70 tonnes flown into Australia on infamous flight from Chinese coronavirus epicentre Wuhan is
25 sitting in a warehouse and STILL hasn't cleared customs
26 QUOTE
27 The Department of Home Affairs confirmed the Australian Border Force was still investigating the
28 equipment and whether it met requirements from the Therapeutic Goods Administration.
29 END QUOTE
30
31 In my view, there might be a likely hood that the 2,000 facemask may have been infected before
32 they were distributed to health care workers. So to say the Jury is still out, as to if the attack upon
33 the immune system may soon be followed who to seek to get the blame for the mismanagement.
34 Also consider:
35
36 https://www.msn.com/en-au/news/australia/covid-19-could-be-lurking-within-community-for-up-to-two-
37 years/ar-BB13yyzy?ocid=spartandhp
38 COVID-19 could be lurking within community for 'up to' two years
39
40 Let me use a simple explanation why this reference to COVID-19 might be grossly misleading.
41 .
42 I some years ago had a tire to regularly go down. And, so had to regularly pump it up. But when I needed to
43 replace my tires I held that would be the end of it. After all, if there was a tiny hole in the tubeless tire then
44 being replaced would be the end of problems. Well it turned out with the new tires the same rim still had a
45 flattening tire. So, in my view it was rather a defect in the rim itself that may prevent the tubeless tire to seal
46 properly.
47
48 If indeed the so called “COVID-19” is a misunderstanding/misconception and because of it
49 patients are placed at risk, because what may have been possible with the coronavirus some
50 years ago may not at all be suitable with this so called COVID-19. A clear example is the
51 reported wrong programming of ventilators that rather kill patients then to save their lives, due to
52 the application of air pressure that becomes too much for the patients to handle and then dies as
53 result of the pressure and not the so-called COVID-19. A major problem is the financial
54 incentive, such as in the USA, to claim a person used a ventilator and this bring $39,000

Page 38
1 payment to the hospital. As such, an incentive to misreport anyone as a COVID-19 victim and to
2 use a ventilator no matter how harmful this might be in the end to the patient.
3 We then also might get a better understand/perception why children show symptoms that are
4 considerably different then those ordinary claimed to be associated with the so called COVID-19
5 victims.
6 We also seem to have another problem where many experts claim that the so called “virus” can
7 be kept at bay by 1.5 metres (social) distancing and limiting businesses to operate
8 (LOCKDOWN), deny ordinary HEALTHY people to go about their ordinary way of life, etc.
9 Yet, it is also reported that the disease can linger around for about 2 years. And considering that
10 Slovakian Prime minister reported contaminated face mask, then considering the time of
11 transport from the Chinese manufacturer to Slovakia the truth might be that this really is a
12 DISEASE “X” which has been wrongly labeled COVID-19! Indeed, the 2,000 face mask that
13 were provided to the Cedar Meats might have been the culprit of the outbreak, and the same
14 might likely have or will eventuate in other States or Territories, where items are imported
15 without proper clearance being free from any diseases. While the time duration for Border Force
16 to release an alleged 70 ton of items might be unreasonable, nevertheless considering the above
17 to rush it through and get another disaster must be avoided.
18 I have in past writings criticized the Federal government lacking leadership and the Ruby
19 Princess in my view was a clear example where the Federal Minister for health Mr Greg Hunt
20 appeared to me to be MISSING IN ACTION. Well we now seems to have that the
21 “Therapeutic Goods Administration” is seemingly failing to address the urgency of supplies.
22 In the current circumstances of a LOCKDOWN (apart of it constitutional legality) one would
23 assume that the “Therapeutic Goods Administration” would make it its priority to deal with
24 such items. As such, the failure for the “Therapeutic Goods Administration” to competently
25 process items may encourage others, if this were to be done so, to import items avoiding such
26 required inspection. I also view that there should be a special legal provision that anyone who
27 imports items without due regard or deliberately circumventing importation of medical items
28 and/or other such supplied and causes and/or may have caused a disease to infect others shall be
29 if found guilty be imprisoned for no less than 10 years.
30
31 In my view full faceshield are far better to be used this as the removal and refitting is less likely
32 to cause cross contamination from shield to face as is with a facemask. Also the face of the
33 person remains clear. I have not as yet seen any facesmask for women with red lips on them, but
34 that might just come in the future?
35 Whereas when one has a beard the facemask will not seal appropriately and in fact the so called
36 droplets may end up in a persons beard (albeit the same may be argued for ones hair on the head)
37 a face shield might be the better way to go about.
38 .
39 There is also a dispute between scientist and other experts that the disease is not just in droplet
40 formal but also airborne. See “Once upon a virus” https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q5BZ09iNdvo
41 'Once Upon a Virus': China mocks US ... - The Japan Times
42 https://www.japantimes.co.jp/news/2020/05/03/asia-pacific/china-mocks-us-coronavirus-
43 response-lego-animation/
44 6 days ago ... China has published a short animation titled "Once Upon a Virus"
45 mocking the U.S. response to the new coronavirus using Lego-like figures to ...
46
47 In this however the Chinese refer to “airborne”.
48 If as suggested in this video the so called COVID-19 is “airborne” then the disease (by
49 whatever name you may call it) could be far more harmful, then is currently acknowledged. Was
50 this video that appears to be created to so to say make fools out of the USA really one that seeks

Page 39
1 to drive the message that the disease is “airborne”? As such, the Chinese Government while not
2 directly claiming it is “airborne” nevertheless are warning it is “airborne”.
3
4 Obviously, as I wrote about in the past the issue of 5G cannot be ignored.
5 Even if scientist and doctors may claim that it is a coronavirus any effect of 5G may very well
6 cause the very symptoms now claimed to relate to children.
7 It is in my view totally absurd to LOCKDOWN the general community and yet ignore any
8 possible effect of 5G. If 5G causes/contribute to the disease then let this be addressed
9 immediately, after all the Ruby Princess, so other cruise ships, had 5G usage.
10
11 * So, the culprit with the Cedar meats Brooklyn outbreak might have been the facemask that
12 were distributed?
13
14 **#** It is not for me to determine this, however considering the report about the facemask
15 regarding Slovakia it is a reasonable issue to consider. But, there is also a further legal issue to
16 it.
17 END QUOTE 20200510-PRESS RELEASE Mr G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B. ISSUE – Why Cedar Meats,
18 the Victorian abattoir outbreak could eventuate in other states also
19
20
21 The document dated 20190726 should be considered dated 20200726 as was in the heading.
22
23 QUOTE 20190726-G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B. to Mr Daniel Andrews Premier of Victoria-COMPLAINT
24 Mr Daniel Andrews Premier 26-7-2020
25 daniel.andrews@parliament.vic.gov.au
26
27 Cc; PM Scott Morrison & ors
28
29 COMPLAINT Re VOCID-19 issues, etc (OPPOSITION TO WEAR A FACE MASK, ETC)
30 Sir,
31 END QUOTE 20190726-G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B. to Mr Daniel Andrews Premier of Victoria-COMPLAINT
32 And
33 QUOTE 20190726-G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B. to Mr Daniel Andrews Premier of Victoria-COMPLAINT
34 Considering that by July 2019 the Chinese Government then asked citizens to be tested it
35 underlines that the disease was then already considerably and with international travel it
36 was spread amongst other countries. However, as the disease was not named until COVID-
37 19 was declared then many who in the meantime died simply were listed as natural deaths
38 or whatever but not related to COVID-19.
39 .
40 As I wrote about months ago the Chinese cartoon video warned about aerosol spread and
41 that it would be ignored. And well up to now I never heard you commenting about aerosol
42 or for that matter the health officials. After all aerosol can enter the eyes tear ducks and
43 cause havoc. Hence, glasses might then be protecting a person. Yet, I didn’t hear any
44 mention about glasses.
45 I doubt that those held in the hotel were required to protect their eyes. Then again the
46 inquiry might come up with the details if it was or wasn’t.
47 .
48 What appears to me is that you simply lost the plot, and do not know how to address
49 issues. So lockdown and mask seems to me to be your way of admitting gross
50 incompetence. Locking up health people and forcing them to wear mask that can only
51 cause them to fall ill I view is not the conduct of a competent leader! You can now prove
52 you are not some wimp/coward and well prove you are willing to litigate against me in a

Page 40
1 competent court of all. At least than the citizens of Victoria and others may be able to have
2 a court decision they can rely upon.
3
4 For your benefit, I below have listed numerous documents I would rely upon if there was
5 to eventuate litigation. I have absolutely no intention to abort my constitutional rights and
6 have no intention to wear a mask.
7 Mask only serve certain purposes for which they are designed and most mask packages
8 makes that clear. Many stipulate they are not suitable for COVID-19 and as such I view no
9 Government should give a citizen a false sense of security that the wearing of a mask
10 somehow protects anyone, when it might not be so at all.
11
12 I challenge the Victorian Government and others to take me on in a test-case as to the validity of the
13 school project “SOCIAL DISTANCING” and the harm full “MASK” wearing Premier Daniel
14 Andrews claim is based on “science”. What “science”?
15 This document can be downloaded from:
16 https://www.scribd.com/document/469769327/20200720-Press-Release-Mr-G-H-Schorel-Hlavka-O-W-B-
17 Issue-Royal-Commission-Into-Covid-19-Issues-is-Badly-Needed-suppl-9-Mask
19 ROYAL COMMISSION into COVID-19 issues is badly needed-Supplement 9-Mask
20 END QUOTE 20190726-G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B. to Mr Daniel Andrews Premier of Victoria-COMPLAINT
21
22 No parent should have to deal with undesired problems with a child merely so the politicians and
23 medical profession prefers to place the money making interest of pharmaceutical companies as
24 well as themselves above the interest and wellbeing and the lives of children and others.
25
26 What appears to me to be very clear is that Premier Daniel Andrews and others such as those in
27 the Federal Government were selfish, egoistic and were lairs as to find it more important for their
28 own greed, etc, then to be concerned about their constituents/patients constitutional, legal,
29 humanitarian and natural rights. Just consider how many lives could have been saved if Premier
30 Daniel Andrews and others had bothered to consider my writings and acted appropriately in that
31 regard? Likewise how many citizens could have avoided becoming ill and/or disabled? What has
32 been shown is their egoistic self-righteous arrogant conduct that well they knew better regardless
33 they didn’t. And well now let the people hold them legally accountable. I view that politicians
34 having made an oath/affirmation nevertheless acted contrary to it must be deemed guilty of
35 HIGH TREASON. They were elected to represent constituents and not for self-enrichment and
36 ignorance. Instead they acted as agents for foreign powers such as the pharmaceutical companies
37 and this we cannot ignore and neither forgive or forget. No amnesty will be justified as they in
38 my view are cold blooded murderers and must be held legally accountable.
39
40 I understand that Queensland now implemented mask mandates and obviously we can expect
41 that Premier Daniel Andrews if re-elected will likely do the same. Never mind the littering of
42 dead bodies so far all he is about is to serve the foreign powers. /then again if we had a Federal
43 Minister for Health having balls he would simply immediately take Queensland to the High
44 Court of Australia making clear that Queensland cannot exercise any legislative, executive and
45 administrative powers when it comes to “man-kind” infectious diseases for which “quarantine”
46 in some way or another is required.
47
49 QUOTE
50 Mr. BARTON.-I was going to explain when I was interrupted that the moment the Commonwealth
51 legislates on this subject the power will become exclusive.
52 END QUOTE
53
Page 41
1 QUOTE
2 Mr. BARTON (New South Wales).-If this is left as an exclusive power the laws of the states will
3 nevertheless remain in force under clause 100.
4 Mr. TRENWITH.-Would the states still proceed to make laws?

5 Mr. BARTON.-Not after this power of legislation comes into force. Their existing laws will, however,
6 remain. If this is exclusive they can make no new laws, but the necessity of making these new laws will be
7 all the more forced on the Commonwealth.
8 END QUOTE
9
11 QUOTE
12 My only desire is to give power to the Federal Parliament to achieve a scheme for old-age
13 pensions if it be practicable, and if the people require it. No power would be taken away
14 from the states. The sub-section would not interfere with the right of any state to act in
15 the meantime until the Federal Parliament took the matter in hand.
16 END QUOTE
17
19 QUOTE
20 Mr. HIGGINS.-Suppose the sentry is asleep, or is in the swim with the other power?
21
22 Mr. GORDON.-There will be more than one sentry. In the case of a federal law, every member of a state
23 Parliament will be a sentry, and, every constituent of a state Parliament will be a sentry.
24 As regards a law passed by a state, every man in the Federal Parliament will be a sentry, and the whole
25 constituency behind the Federal Parliament will be a sentry.
26 END QUOTE
27
28 It is absurd that we have so many people being lawyers and yet when it comes to acting rightly
29 they seems to be utterly worthless that it makes me wonder if they really hold any legal
30 qualifications at all.
31 It reminds me on a counsellor who had prepared a report for the Court claiming that he was a
32 member of a certain religion and had his qualification as such. After nearly a day cross-
33 examining him I wasn’t getting anywhere, and the trial judge asked me if I wanted to finish with
34 the witness or continue after the long weekend. I indicated I still wanted to cross-examine him
35 further. Over the weekend I happen to go to a fast food restaurant and next door was a bookshop.
36 Having some time on my hand I decided to browse the bookshop. Low and behold there was a
37 copy of the religion the counsellor had based his report upon. So, I purchased the book and read
38 it. Then when I commenced to continue my cross-examination I commenced to ask about
39 principles in his religion upon which, surprise, surprise, he responded he no longer followed that
40 religion. He was now in humanity. That is when the judge intervened and claimed that as he was
41 now a humanist then I could no longer question him about his previous religion. How on earth
42 could a trial judge accept a report based upon a religious concept and accept a day of evidence
43 given and then suddenly the counsellor claiming to have changed religion now his past evidence
44 still stood without being allowed to further cross-examine about the previous evidence? I then
45 asked him about his evidence that he was not concerned about violence when he was a humanist.
46 The trial judge seemed to be bias as in his reason of judgment he totally disregarded the
47 conflicting evidence. What I exposed was that this counsellor was a fake and claimed some
48 religious qualification when he never really could answer a question about that religion. It was
49 some alleged American religion and well, all you need to do now is to fabricate to be qualified
50 by some unheard American religion and print yourself some qualification document and then the
51 Court will employ you even so it is all fake. More than likely this fake counsellor never expected
52 me to be able to get a book about that religion and be able to challenge him. The same where I
53 commenced to cross-examine a witness who had been giving allegedly unquestionable evidence

Page 42
1 as to the location he had made electronic photos for which a GPS chart was filed as evidence. I
2 commenced the cross-examination with “I put it to you that you are not telling the truth. Are
3 you?” The trial judge immediately asked me; “Are you claiming he is lying?” Upon which I
4 responded: “Your Honour, the witness will himself admit to that.” I then drew the witness
5 attention to certain photo’s he had identified as being taken with GPS location and pointed out
6 that contrary to his evidence that they showed one and the same building the buildings showed
7 one with a red roof and one with a white roof and so clearly were different. I asked where the
8 photos were taken as clearly the GPS couldn’t be correct. The witness then admitted HE DID
9 NOT KNOW where one of the buildings was located. Over the decades when cross-examining
10 witnesses I would time and time again, as an opponent barrister once interjected: “He is
11 surgically taking apart my witness affidavit”. As I in both cases defeated the Commonwealth in
12 AEC v Schorel-Hlavka for “FAILING TO VOTE” regardless many lawyers predicted i would
13 lose both cases as in their view my constitutional issues had no validity, well I proved them all
14 wrong. And that is so to say having balls to stand your ground and know what you are on about.
15 What I like to see is that the Federal Minister for Health Mr Butler proves he had balls to stand
16 his ground and stop the States from unconstitutionally interfering with Commonwealth exclusive
17 legislative, executive and administrative powers and so may avoid many Australians to not
18 become victim of serious diseases and/or death.
19
20 Commonwealth of Australia Constitution Act 1900 (UK) Section 51
21 QUOTE
22 (xxi) marriage;
23 (xxii) divorce and matrimonial causes; and in relation thereto,
24 parental rights, and the custody and guardianship of infants;
25 (xxiii) invalid and old-age pensions;
26 (xxiiiA) the provision of maternity allowances, widows’ pensions, child endowment, unemployment,
27 pharmaceutical, sickness and hospital benefits, medical and dental services (but not so as to authorize any
28 form of civil conscription), benefits to students and family allowances;
29 END QUOTE
30
31 The Commonwealth clearly has exclusive legislative powers (as since it commence to legislate
32 the States no longer had the “concurrent” legislative powers which is amplified when the High
33 Court of Australia made its ruling regarding income taxation being exclusively for the
34 Commonwealth once it commenced to legislate as to income taxation.) as to the above quoted
35 constitutional provisions. However, marriage must be understood to be as was in 1889 Act
36 Interpretation Act (UK) when the Commonwealth of Australia Constitution Act 1900 (UK) was
37 enacted in 1900.
38
39 “.However, the judiciary has no power to amend or modernize the Constitution to give effect to what
40 Judges think is in the best public interest. The function of the judiciary, including the function of this
41 Court, is to give effect to the intention of the makers of the Constitution as evinced by the terms in which
42 they expressed that intention. That necessarily means that decisions, taken almost a century ago by people
43 long dead, bind the people of Australia today even in cases where most people agree that those decisions are
44 out of touch with the present needs of Australian society.”
45
46 ":.. The starting point for a principled interpretation of the Constitution is the search for the
47 intention of its makers" Gaudron J (Wakim, HCA27\99)
48
49 "... But … in the interpretation of the Constitution the connotation or connotations of its words should remain
50 constant. We are not to give words a meaning different from any meaning which they could have borne in
51 1900. Law is to be accommodated to changing facts. It is not to be changed as language changes. "
52 Windeyer J (Ex parte Professional Engineers' Association)
53
54
Page 43
1 Re Wakim; Ex parte McNally; Re Wakim; Ex parte Darvall; Re Brown; Ex parte Amann; Spi [1999] HCA
2 27 (17 June 1999)
3 QUOTE
4 Constitutional interpretation
5 The starting point for a principled interpretation of the Constitution is the search for the
6 intention of its makers[51]. That does not mean a search for their subjective beliefs, hopes
7 or expectations. Constitutional interpretation is not a search for the mental states of those
8 who made, or for that matter approved or enacted, the Constitution. The intention of its
9 makers can only be deduced from the words that they used in the historical context in
10 which they used them[52]. In a paper on constitutional interpretation, presented at
11 Fordham University in 1996, Professor Ronald Dworkin argued, correctly in my
12 opinion[53]:
13 "We must begin, in my view, by asking what - on the best evidence available - the
14 authors of the text in question intended to say. That is an exercise in what I have
15 called constructive interpretation[54]. It does not mean peeking inside the skulls of
16 people dead for centuries. It means trying to make the best sense we can of an
17 historical event - someone, or a social group with particular responsibilities, speaking
18 or writing in a particular way on a particular occasion."
19 END QUOTE
20
22 QUOTE
23 Mr. DEAKIN (Victoria).-The position of my honorable and learned friend (Mr. [start page 2092] Higgins)
24 may be perfectly correct. It may be that without any special provision the practice of the High Court, when
25 declaring an Act ultra vires, would be that such a declaration applied only to the part which trespassed
26 beyond the limits of the Constitution. If that were so, it would be a general principle applicable to the
27 interpretation of the whole of the Constitution.
28 END QUOTE
29 .
31 QUOTE
32 Mr. GLYNN.-I think they would, because it is fixed in the Constitution. There is no special court, but the
33 general courts would undoubtedly protect the states. What Mr. Isaacs seeks to do is to prevent the question of
34 ultra vires arising after a law has been passed.
35 [start page 2004]
36 Mr. ISAACS.-No. If it is ultra vires of the Constitution it would, of course, be invalid.
37 END QUOTE
38
39 Hansard 1-3-1898 Constitution Convention
40 QUOTE
41 Mr. GORDON.-Well, I think not. I am sure that if the honorable member applies his mind to the subject he
42 will see it is not abstruse. If a statute of either the Federal or the states Parliament be taken into court the court
43 is bound to give an interpretation according to the strict hyper-refinements of the law. It may be a good law
44 passed by "the sovereign will of the people," although that latter phrase is a common one which I do not care
45 much about. The court may say-"It is a good law, but as it technically infringes on the Constitution we
46 will have to wipe it out." As I have said, the proposal I support retains some remnant of parliamentary
47 sovereignty, leaving it to the will of Parliament on either side to attack each other's laws.
48 END QUOTE
49
51 QUOTE Mr. THYNNE:
52 The constitution of this federation will not be charged with the duty of resisting privileged classes, for the
53 whole power will be vested in the people themselves. They are the complete legislative power of the whole of
54 these colonies, and they shall be so. From [start page 106] them will rise, first of all, the federal constitution
55 which we are proposing to establish, and in the next place will come the legislative powers of the several
56 colonies. The people will be the authority above and beyond the separate legislatures, and the royal
57 prerogative exercised, in their interest and for their benefit, by the advice of their ministers will be practically
58 vested in them. They will exercise the sovereignty of the states, they will be charged with the full power
Page 44
1 and dignity of the state, and it is from them that we must seek the giving to each of those bodies that will be
2 in existence concurrently the necessary powers for their proper management and existence. Each assembly,
3 each legislature, whether state or federal existing under this constitution, will be as Dicey again says-a
4 merely subordinate law-making body whose laws will be valid, whilst within the authority conferred
5 upon it by the constitution, but invalid and unconstitutional if they go beyond the limits of such
6 authority.
7 END QUOTE
8
9 “A pretend law made in excess of power is not and never has been a law at all. Anybody in the
10 country is entitled to disregard it”. Chief Justice Latham 1942
11
13 QUOTE
14 Dr. COCKBURN: All our experience hitherto has been under the condition of parliamentary sovereignty.
15 Parliament has been the supreme body. But when we embark on federation we throw parliamentary
16 sovereignty overboard. Parliament is no longer supreme. Our parliaments at present are not only legislative,
17 but constituent bodies. They have not only the power of legislation, but the power of amending their
18 constitutions. That must disappear at once on the abolition of parliamentary sovereignty. No parliament
19 under a federation can be a constituent body; it will cease to have the power of changing its
20 constitution at its own will. Again, instead of parliament being supreme, the parliaments of a federation are
21 coordinate bodies-the main power is split up, instead of being vested in one body. More than all that, there is
22 this difference: When parliamentary sovereignty is dispensed with, instead of there being a high court of
23 parliament, you bring into existence a powerful judiciary which towers above all powers, legislative and
24 executive, and which is the sole arbiter and interpreter of the constitution.
25 END QUOTE
26
27 By the federation no Parliament was any longer a sovereign Parliament as they became
28 “constitutional Parliaments” neither was any Court a sovereign court because they became
29 “Constitutional Courts” then the following clearly is incorrect:
30
31 https://jade.barnet.com.au/Jade.html#!article=67680
32 Chief Justice French in his speech “The Common Law and the Protection of Human
33 Rights”
34 to the Anglo Australiasian Lawyers Society on 4th September 2009, said:-
35 “ We do so against the backdrop of the supremacy of Parliament"
36
37
38 http://www.austlii.edu.au/au/cases/cth/HCA/2013/55.html
39 The Commonwealth v Australian Capital Territory [2013] HCA 55 (12 December 2013)
40 QUOTE
41 FRENCH CJ, HAYNE, CRENNAN, KIEFEL, BELL AND KEANE JJ. The only issue
42 which this Court can decide is a legal issue. Is the Marriage Equality (Same Sex) Act
43 2013, enacted by the Legislative Assembly for the Australian Capital Territory,
44 inconsistent with either or both of two Acts of the federal Parliament: the Marriage Act
45 1961 and the Family Law Act 1975? That question must be answered "Yes". Under the
46 Constitution and federal law as it now stands, whether same sex marriage should be
47 provided for by law (as a majority of the Territory Legislative Assembly decided) is a
48 matter for the federal Parliament.
49 END QUOTE
50
51 The States lacked any legislative powers as to De Facto relationships pretending to be De Facto
52 marriages and the States neither had any constitutional powers to amend their own constitutions
53 without approval by way of State referendums.
54
55 Thu, 31 Oct 2002
Page 45
1 QUOTE
2 Dear Mr Schorel-Hlavka
3 Thank you for your letter.
4 There is no bias, any more than there would be for a woman judge sitting in a case
5 involving women or a male judge in a rape case.
6 Your views on the Constitution appear to have overlooked s 51(xxxvii) of the Constitution.
7 If that power were not enough, and none of the other heads of power sufficed, it is true
8 that an amendment of the Constitution might be required. Alternatively, there are
9 cooperative schemes for parallel legislation. Ours is a cooperative federation, as the
10 Constitution itself envisaged.
11 Sincerely, Michael Kirby
12 END QUOTE
13
14 Kirby J omitted to consider that the “parallel legislation” being concurrent” legislation seized to
15 be applicable once the Commonwealth commenced to legislate as to certain subject matters
16 within its constitutional permitted subject matters. Likewise, French CJ seemed to have failed to
17 understand that the court cannot modernise the constitution upon its wimps. The court is part of
18 the constitution and not above it!
19
20 Section 51(xxxvii) was no more but a provision for the Commonwealth to accept referral of State
21 legislation but as French J (WA) then stated the States must find their powers elsewhere. That is
22 by State referendum. This is because the Supreme Court of a state cannot have its judicial
23 powers interfered with because of the separation of powers by the State parliament. When then
24 the State desires to refer State legislative powers to the Commonwealth only the State electors by
25 way of State referendum can approve this as it reduces also the original judicial powers of the
26 State Supreme Court.
27
28 Neither can the Commonwealth within Section 51(xxiiA) fund unconstitutional vaccinations as
29 was with the covid scam so called vaccinations. Any powers exercised by any Parliament,
30 Executive and the courts must always be and remain to be within the legal principles embedded
31 in the Commonwealth of Australia Constitution Act 1900 (UK) within which the States in
32 Section 106 were created “subject to this constitution”.
33
34 For the above all and any funding to the States regarding COVID-19 purported vaccinations was
35 and remains unconstitutional. Likewise the Commonwealth marriage legislation is and remains
36 unconstitutional when it comes to same-sex, etc so called marriages that fall outside the legal
37 principles as applicable at the time of the constitution being enacted.
38
40 constitution!
41



20221112-Mr G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B. To R Kershaw Chief Commissioner of The AFP-Suppl 92-HIGH TREASON. Etc-Supplement 2

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

20221112-Mr G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B. To R Kershaw Chief Commissioner of The AFP-Suppl 92-HIGH TREASON. Etc-Supplement 2

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Page 1

12-11-2022 Page 3 © Mr G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B.

12-11-2022 Page 5 © Mr G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B.

50 MAY JUSTICE ALWAYS PREVAIL®

12-11-2022 Page 8 © Mr G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B.

12-11-2022 Page 9 © Mr G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B.

12-11-2022 Page 11 © Mr G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B.

12-11-2022 Page 14 © Mr G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B.

12-11-2022 Page 15 © Mr G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B.

12-11-2022 Page 16 © Mr G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B.

12-11-2022 Page 18 © Mr G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B.

15 ‘Speed of Science’ — A Scandal Beyond Your

1 infection and spread of COVID-19. Small replied:

29 MAY JUSTICE ALWAYS PREVAIL®

12-11-2022 Page 23 © Mr G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B.

1 Previously I Cc’d you copies of my correspondence to Mary-Anne Thomas and Mr

1 Invermectin against a disease going on claimed to be COVID-19 and so by this

1 Mr. MCMILLAN.-The lawyers?

12-11-2022 Page 30 © Mr G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B.

1 Awaiting your response, G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B. (Gerrit)

2 MAY JUSTICE ALWAYS PREVAIL®

12-11-2022 Page 31 © Mr G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B.

12-11-2022 Page 32 © Mr G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B.

12-11-2022 Page 33 © Mr G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B.

12-11-2022 Page 36 © Mr G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B.

12-11-2022 Page 37 © Mr G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B.

12-11-2022 Page 38 © Mr G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B.

12-11-2022 Page 39 © Mr G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B.

4 Mr. TRENWITH.-Would the states still proceed to make laws?

12-11-2022 Page 41 © Mr G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B.

44 MAY JUSTICE ALWAYS PREVAIL®

12-11-2022 Page 45 © Mr G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B.

You might also like