Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Criteria for judging best debaters and speakers

    Uploaded by

    Noel Sinco
    118 views3 pages
    The document outlines the criteria and rules for a debate competition. It describes the scoring breakdown for best speaker, best debater, and best rebuttal. It also lists the order of speeches and interpellations. Performance will be judged based on delivery, constructive speech/reasoning, and audience impact. Teams will be evaluated on teamwork, evidence, and audience response.

    Original Description:

    Original Title

    Debate

    Copyright

    © Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)

    Available Formats

    DOC, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    The document outlines the criteria and rules for a debate competition. It describes the scoring breakdown for best speaker, best debater, and best rebuttal. It also lists the order of speeches and interpellations. Performance will be judged based on delivery, constructive speech/reasoning, and audience impact. Teams will be evaluated on teamwork, evidence, and audience response.

    Copyright:

    Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
    Download as DOC, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    118 views3 pages

    Criteria for judging best debaters and speakers

    Uploaded by

    Noel Sinco
    The document outlines the criteria and rules for a debate competition. It describes the scoring breakdown for best speaker, best debater, and best rebuttal. It also lists the order of speeches and interpellations. Performance will be judged based on delivery, constructive speech/reasoning, and audience impact. Teams will be evaluated on teamwork, evidence, and audience response.

    Copyright:

    Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
    Download as DOC, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 3

    Criteria for Judging Best Speaker 1) Delivery (40%) - ability to speak clearly in conveying the Information to the audience

    ) !onstructive "peech (40%) - creation of a speech that is coherent# logical and easier to understand $) %udience Impact ( 0%) - the audience reacts &ith the speech of the "peaker 'est Debater 1) Interpellation (40%) -ability to argue in his favor ) (ogic (40%) - use of logic and fallacies $) %udience Impact ( 0%)

    Rules of the Debate 1) 1st %ffirmative- speaks constructive speech 1st +egative- interpellates the 1st %ffirmative ) 1st +egative- speaks constructive speech 1st %ffirmative- interpellates the 1st +egative $) nd %ffirmative- speaks constructive speech +egative- interpellates the %ffirmative
    nd nd

    4) nd +egative- speaks constructive speech

    nd %ffirmative- interpellates the nd 'est )ebuttal +egative 1) )efutation (40%) - ability to negate the opposing side*s arguments ,) $rd %ffirmative- speaks constructive %nd to uplift your side speech ) Delivery (40%) $rd +egative- interpellates the $rd -ability to speak clearly in conveying the %ffirmative Information to the audience $) %udience Impact ( 0%) rd - the audience reacts &ith the speech of the -) $ +egative- speaks constructive speech speaker

    $rd %ffirmative- interpellates $rd +egative Break (5 minutes) for the reation of the Rebuttal Spee h .eam !aptain (+egative)- )ebuttal "peech (,minutes) .eam !aptain (%ffirmative)- )ebuttal "peech (, minutes) 1st Affirmative Speaker

    Best Speaker Delivery (40%) !onstructive "peech (40%) %udience Impact ( 0%) .otal

    Best Debater Interpellation (40%) )easoning (40%) %udience Impact ( 0%) .otal

    Best Rebuttal )efutation (40%) Delivery (40%) %udience Impact ( 0%) .otal

    !nd Affirmative Speaker Best Speaker Delivery (40%) !onstructive "peech (40%) %udience Impact ( 0%) .otal

    Best Debater Interpellation (40%) )easoning (40%) %udience Impact ( 0%) .otal

    Best Rebuttal )efutation (40%) Delivery (40%) %udience Impact ( 0%) .otal

    "rd Affirmative Speaker Best Speaker Delivery (40%) !onstructive "peech (40%) %udience Impact ( 0%) .otal Best Debater Interpellation (40%) )easoning (40%) %udience Impact ( 0%) .otal Best Rebuttal )efutation (40%) Delivery (40%) %udience Impact ( 0%) .otal

    Best #eam #eam$ork (%&') (viden e (%&') Audien e )mpa t (!&')

    1st *egative Speaker Best Speaker Delivery (40%) !onstructive "peech (40%) %udience Impact ( 0%) .otal Best Debater Interpellation (40%) )easoning (40%) %udience Impact ( 0%) .otal Best Rebuttal )efutation (40%) Delivery (40%) %udience Impact ( 0%) .otal

    !nd *egative Speaker Best Speaker Delivery (40%) !onstructive "peech (40%) %udience Impact ( 0%) .otal Best Debater Interpellation (40%) )easoning (40%) %udience Impact ( 0%) .otal Best Rebuttal )efutation (40%) Delivery (40%) %udience Impact ( 0%) .otal

    "rd *egative Speaker Best Speaker Delivery (40%) !onstructive "peech (40%) %udience Impact ( 0%) .otal Best Debater Interpellation (40%) )easoning (40%) %udience Impact ( 0%) .otal Best Rebuttal )efutation (40%) Delivery (40%) %udience Impact ( 0%) .otal

    Best #eam #eam$ork (%&') (viden e (%&') Audien e )mpa t (!&')

    You might also like