Welcome to Scribd, the world's digital library. Read, publish, and share books and documents. See more
Download
Standard view
Full view
of .
Look up keyword
Like this
1Activity
0 of .
Results for:
No results containing your search query
P. 1
Jones v. Smith et al - Document No. 3

Jones v. Smith et al - Document No. 3

Ratings: (0)|Views: 2 |Likes:
Published by Justia.com
ORDER granting 2 Motion to appear pro hac vice. John Somyak is hereby admitted to the bar of this Court for the limited purpose of appearing in this case as counsel for Plaintiff. Signed by Judge Susan Webber Wright on 9/24/07. (jct) 3:2007cv00130 Arkansas Eastern District Court
ORDER granting 2 Motion to appear pro hac vice. John Somyak is hereby admitted to the bar of this Court for the limited purpose of appearing in this case as counsel for Plaintiff. Signed by Judge Susan Webber Wright on 9/24/07. (jct) 3:2007cv00130 Arkansas Eastern District Court

More info:

Published by: Justia.com on Apr 30, 2008
Copyright:Public Domain

Availability:

Read on Scribd mobile: iPhone, iPad and Android.
download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
See more
See less

10/14/2013

pdf

text

original

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS

JONESBORO DIVISION
JOHNNIE LEE JONESPlaintiff
VS.

EDDIE L. SMITH and USF
HOLLAND, INC.
Defendants
***********
****
NO: 3:07CV00130 SWW
ORDER

John Somyak, an attorney from Texas, seeks permission to appear pro hac vice as
counsel for Plaintiff in this case. Under Local Rule 83.5(d), an applicant to appear pro hac vice
\u201cshall designate a member of the Bar of these Courts who maintains an office in Arkansas for the
practice of law with whom the court and opposing counsel may readily communicate regarding
the conduct of the case.\u201d However, upon written motion, the Court may waive the local counsel
requirement and permit the non-enrolled attorney to proceed without designating local counsel
for the limited purpose of the pending litigation.See Rule 83.5(d). When seeking admissionpro

hac vice without designated counsel, \u201cnon-enrolled counsel must affirm to [the Local Rules of
the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas] and to the jurisdiction of the
Court in matters of discipline.\u201d Rule 83.5(d).
Attorney Somyak does not designate local counsel, nor does he specifically request that
Case 3:07-cv-00130-SWW Document 3
Filed 09/24/2007 Page 1 of 2
Jones v. Smith et al
Doc. 3
Dockets.Justia.com

You're Reading a Free Preview

Download
scribd
/*********** DO NOT ALTER ANYTHING BELOW THIS LINE ! ************/ var s_code=s.t();if(s_code)document.write(s_code)//-->