Professional Documents
Culture Documents
2
3
4
5
6
Processing
• Watered & shaded to avoid heat
stress
• Standard morphometrics, evaluation
of condition, photography
• Lavage (thru 1995, green turtles
only).
• Incanel & rototags
• Trovan (PIT tags) dorsal RF flipper
(region of radius).
Processing
• Blood sampling, 10cc : sex
determination (RIA, Owens), &
basic chemistry (NMFS).
• Centrifuged heparinized tubes
on-board within 2 hours of
collection & iced until storage at
(-80 oC).
CPUE: Catch Per Unit
Effort
C / (L x T )
C= # of captures
L= net length
T= time net soak
RESULTS
• Effort
• CPUE: Spatial, Temporal (short , long-term)
• Species Composition
• Sex ratio
• Fibropapilloma
• Incidental Captures
RESULTS
1994-96: N= 34 turtles
80 km net hrs
[
1977-78: N= 95 turtles
453 net km hrs ]
0.3 CPUE per ZONE
1994-1996
0.6
0.0
0.6
0.1
0.3
0.0
MEAN & STD for CPUES for each Zone
during the 1990’s study.
2.0
1.5
CPUE STAT
1.0
0.5
0.0
1 2 3 4 5 6 T1
-0.5
ZONE
0.70 1990’s
CPUEs
0.60
WIN vs
SPG
0.50 19%
23%
Effort
0.40
CPUE
FALL
0.30 30% SUM
28%
0.20 km net hr
Caretta
0.10 Chelonia
0.00
SPG SUM FALL WIN
SEASON
Species Composition (%)
0.8 1 2 3 4 5 6 T1 Tot
ZONE & TOTAL 70cc
0.6 70cm
0.4
0.2
0.0
1 2 3 4 5 6 T1 Tot
ZONE & TOTAL
CPUE for all turtles captured
in the 1990s vs 1970s
0.8
90's
70's
0.6
CPUE
0.4
0.2
0
1 2 3 4 5 6 Total
ZONE
Comparison of CPUEs for Chelonia & Caretta
for 1990's & 1970's
0.8
90CMCPUE 70cmcpue
0.7 90CCCPUE 70cccpue
0.6
0.5
CPUE
0.4
0.3
0.2
0.1
0
1 2 3 4 5 6
ZONE
CPUE for sea turtles in the 1970's vs the 1990s:
90's
70-pub - (Mendonca & Ehrhart,1982), 70s pub
70-mtm - adjusted for diurnal net sets 70's mtm
0.8
Turtles / net km hour
0.7
0.6
0.5
0.4
0.3
0.2
0.1
0
1 2 3 4 5 6 Total
Netting Zone
Limulus polyphemus ?
Sex
Females accounted for
94.4 % Chelonia and
66.6 % Caretta.
(n= 18, 3)
SIZE (MEAN)
Total
TIME CM w Paps % w Paps
1995 11 6 55%
1996 16 10 63%
Overall 27 16 59%
Fibropapilloma Turtles
Mean # Paps by
Pap Size Class
Pap = tumor
Long Distance
Captures
Charleston, S.C