Freedom of Information Request Registered Mail

http://www.scribd.
com/doc/21223106/Freedom-of-
Information-Request-Registered-Mail
October 17 2009
LIFE: The simplicity that isn’t
“Choose a job you love, and you will never have to work a day in your life”
Sanity belongs to everyone as does the reality we inhabit and share
The Labour of Love … the Ultimate Oxymoron
He is not heavy … he is my brother
Natural Humanism
Sanity
“Why should an individual work the majority of his or her life when unequivocally we all would rather progress to
the ultimate enjoyment without working a day in our LIFE?
Not a probability of undesired labour and unfairly paid efforts that escalate to personal realities of hopelessness and
despair where amoral inclination breeds advancing to criminal persuasion that invariably compromises the ultimate
potential of every individual and society as a whole that begs the question “Truth or Consequences”, as words of
denial deliberately placed “True as Reality Itself” are the Consequences we all pay by accepting the denials and thus
persistently in denial for ulterior purpose incited by the inherent bias nature of every individual that make up the
“Reality that is Humankind”
It is the consistency of denials reared coincidental to ones inherent bias nature amassed and attached to PIG
(Personal Interest Groups) with the humongous majority acquiesced to naivety believing that with words they can
convince other human beings similarly afflicted that they are unbiased, a much preferred status of the environment
where integrity is most respected and scrutinized by a populous of obtrusively habitual liars as the insanity of reality
as a whole adamantly attests.
Reality is that which every individual is born to with innocent empty mind enslaved to his or her necessities to
sustain life tended to by parents or guardians rearing us to be independent adults prepared to provide the necessities
of life for ourselves and through the natural progression of thought and reason we endeavour to advance our quality
of life coincidental and coherent to our interests acquiescing to PIG with our ultimate potential in the realm of the
unknown humongously compromised by our dedicated reluctance to eradicate our inherent bias where progression
of an interest can be humongously detrimental to that of another “PIG”
It is the power and advantage of many people working together to a common purpose with sense in common that a
building can be erected by the forces of many trades, each specialist in pertinent knowledge gained since time began
passed on from generation to generation to the ultimate accomplishment of present time.
When erected to be filled by human beings … invariably consumers will fill it with their necessities such as food,
furniture and paperclips providing a multitude of industries addressing the needs of humankind as all things human
are most emphatically and unequivocally the most ingenious “Wonder of the World” humongously dwarfing the 7 of
common renown as upon their existence simultaneously is the existence of their needs, and their purpose ever
attentive to the progressive nature of thought and reason for progressive advancement upon quality of life with every
individual playing a major role as consumer as equal entities of unique happenstance with the enormity of their
needs as a whole comes opportunity available to the whole to provide fairly for each other ever attentive to
efficiency and effectiveness to deal with human necessities and their progressive advancement to a quality of life
indicative of their adeptness to provide a user friendly data base of knowledge collected over time freely available
for all to use to the ultimate benefit of the whole.
It is due all the happenstances of realities beneficial or otherwise, enjoyed or suffered that all knowledge used to
expand on is the possession of all people of present existence unequivocally paid for endured through the realities of
existence since the beginning of time and subsequently passes on freely available for the ultimate benefit of all
participants of “Humankind”, thus the legitimate purpose of all knowledge and all persons using it whereas an
individual may never hold another individual hostage to their needs having accumulated the knowledge to provide
materials coincidental to their needs of which material would be inane without the existence of individual’s nor
would the necessary knowledge have been collected without the existence of the innumerable individual’s, each an
integral part of the reality that provided the producer of a product the opportunity to
“Choose a job you love, and you will never have to work a day in your life”
Assuredly reality continues without the continuance of any one individual whereas “The Existence of
Humankind” is dependent on a compatible environment, their needs, inherent bias nature, the progressive
nature of thought and reason, the observance of all of realities that can be documented under the natural
phenomenon of Trial and Error” ever attentive to progressive advancement of Humankind where
1
ultimately each individual is an integral part thus the “Cause and Effect” of all realities associated with
“The Existence of Humankind” the Reality of the Whole.
Priority One of all things relative to humankind is every individual’s particular attentiveness to provide
for themselves, being their responsibility to be competent and irreproachable to the task coincidental to
that which is required and expected of them upon being awarded a job on the presumption and the
acceptance of it acknowledged upon receipt of financial gain that invariably melds ones “Priority One” to
provide for themselves to the career chosen to the accomplishment, a union of necessity, an agreement of
the minds that assuredly is and must be accepted by all individuals as a natural thus forming the foundation
of common sense of which to build on as a High Rise Building into the Skies with no limitations except for
our most limited selves as reality attests.
It is due our negligence, deliberate abandonment or refusal to hold true what is and our overpowering bias
that begins the process that could be represented at birth of humankind at the beginning of time by a single
line, the base of a rectangle destined to rise with every individual sharing of information to the benefit of
conclusion of the whole roofed by common sense “The Spirit of the Law” .
It is due the epitome of simplicity and sanity of “The Spirit of the Golden Rule” deduced of sane thought
and reason that has forever blown in the wind within the grasp of quadriplegics easily seen by the blind
well understood by us at 5 prior to the first day of school that gives credence to that which is least apt to be
mistaken by humankind, a natural of human beings, entities of equal ingredients well aware of what is and
what is not receptive of a fellow human entity.
It is history well documented as is the history of government personnel documented by themselves that
Confucius observed and brought to our attention, yet history asserts that
You can lead a horse to water, but cannot make it drink

Most likely because it knows the water is contaminated.
“You can lead a human to knowledge, but you cannot make it think” most likely because it
hasn’t the sense not to shit in the water it drinks.
“There were no dates in this history, but scrawled this way and that across every page were the words
BENEVOLENCE, RIGHTEOUSNESS and MORALITY … finally I began to make out what was written
between the lines; the whole volume was filled with a single phrase: EAT PEOPLE”
It is by their words that we know that they know what is right being what we need to hear from them
consistent with “The Spirit of the Golden Rule” derived of sane thought and reason for we know their
words to be the truth as to what must be in the reality of Humanism and in Canada “The Spirit of the
Golden Rule” was enacted into the supreme law of Canada in 1982, the Constitution that governs us all
that demands the Constitution: Establishment personnel to consistently administer and enforcer it as we are
all presumed to be of the status of the presumption of innocence in absence of evidence to suggest
otherwise.
As with the presumption that demands consistency the Constitution: Establishment hierarchy must be most
emphatically and unequivocally the incarnate of “The Spirit of the Golden Rule” that is “The Spirit of the
Law” that is the Constitution: 1982 Document and therefore must be possessed of the prerequisite traits,
competent responsible and irreproachable with fortitude and conviction to the structuring of a legal system
adept to their mandate with appropriate checks and balances to assure every individual’s equally
guaranteed Charter rights of equal protection and benefits are equally supported.
2
The collective minds of an average class of 5 years olds could invariably conclude in their first week of
sitting that a bully, obviously conspicuous by his or her actions cannot be assigned the task to determine if
he or she is a bully and subsequently pronounce appropriate sentencing or could a jury of his or her peers,
perhaps 12 equivalent bullies be assigned the task without predictable results with the ongoing chaotic
nature of the thing inevitable to expand beyond all comprehension of sanity, yet the Law Society
propagates that have infested the people’s political/legal arena infested and invested the corporate world to
progressively enhance and advance the quality of life of their Society membership along with that of their
affluent and influential friends that persist to ransack the majority in every which way possible to the
excruciating detriment to society as a whole is indicative of their powers as charlatans of deception,
prevarication, manipulation and orchestration.
It is the reality that has allowed them to tap out the financial system to the crisis that commenced a couple
of years ago as they simply pass the debt to the people, the recipients of all their consequences as they take
the liberty to borrow on the majority individual’s credit and future to replenish the kitty so once again they
can suck the economy dry and place the loot in secured numbered accounts
It is the reality that allows me to state without hesitation that the Law Society ASSHOLES have so
humongously reduced the collective minds of the majority to that of a single toad by the time we are adults
that had peaked at 5 when we knew the taming of the bully was in our best interests, but now as working
adults only concerned that as individual’s are not contributing more than their fair share to their personal
ransacking.
All of reality provides the insurmountable evidence that the Charter Democracy Force has published a
prodigious amount on their web sites excerpts extracted from the insane reality we all exist that need only
be seen by persons of sound moral mind, yet most unlikely, due the insane world we all exist, that there are
sufficient numbers of such people with the necessary adeptness to convert the insane to a mind to read it to
coherency.
“It is only the wisest and the stupidest that cannot change”
It is reality that attests and begs the question

“Who the hell else is there”
The wisest of the insane society denoted by their wealth and power to acquire more are most reluctant to
give up what they have and serve the time in punishment for how they acquired it
So what hope do I have to convert society to that expressly defined by law by the mere publication of a
proliferation of irrefutable evidence intended to permeate the collective minds of the majority
unequivocally dwarfed by a single toad in such relative and pertinent matters of law.
Addendum to that with the progressive nature of thought and reason I must add, “Assuredly I must be
insane” concurring with many from both the Upper and Lower tiers for obviously completely adverse
purpose.
They of illegitimate power and wealth with the media on their side have the voice that belongs to the
people never to give it back, an improbability of an entity never had, though by law defined in the “Spirit
of Democracy” where the majority are intended to determine the government personnel to represent us all
in, of and with “The Spirit of the Law” as defined in the 1982 Constitution that governs us all equally as it
equally protects and benefits us all, in no way is the majority entitled to determine the manner in which the
law is administered and enforced whereas there simply cannot be any such thing as a minority
3
discriminated in any way shape or form that would severely compromise their Perpetual Possessory Title
of “EQUALLY GUARANTEED CHARTER RIGHTS”
15. (1) Every individual is equal before and under the law and has the right to the equal protection
and equal benefit of the law without discrimination and, in particular, without discrimination
based on race, national or ethnic origin, colour, religion, sex, age or mental or physical disability.
52. (1) The Constitution of Canada is the supreme law of Canada, and any law that is
inconsistent with the provisions of the Constitution is, to the extent of the inconsistency, of no force
or effect.
Where inconsistencies are revealed it is imperative that they be immediately eradicated, not covered up, to
the certainty that no individual will suffer to deliberately incompetent negligent court personnel being no
other way to define such people due the simplicity and sanity of “The Spirit of the Law”
It is due the consistency “The Spirit of the Law” must be maintained that “The Letter of the Law” defines
particular issues, but never the less the word of humankind has no value unless every effort is set in place
to ensure they are kept being the precise purpose consistency to due punishment must be administered and
enforced and why that responsibility is attached to the office of the Attorney General clearly stated in the
“Roles and Responsibilities of the Attorney General” published on the Ontario web site.
He has been assigned innumerable responsibilities most significant and pertinent to his ultimate
responsibility in, of and with “The Spirit of the Law” as “guardian of the public interest” that has been
already defined in “The Spirit of the Law” that demands the properties of democracy as defined and
commonly published be stringently enforced.
Democracy: social equality, equality, egalitarianism

Egalitarianism: parity, fairness, equal opportunity, impartiality
It is his incomprehensible readily apparent lone authority independent of political or partisan influence, his
responsibility to the certainty of democracy and every individual’s equally guaranteed Charter rights that I
provided him the prodigious amount of irrefutable evidence that the personnel of the innumerable
government departments, agencies and police were obtrusively incompetent to administer and enforce
Ontario laws consistent with the Constitution conducive to the exemplary support of every individual’s
equally guaranteed Charter rights, knowing all along that he was responsible for the actions of the
deliberately incompetent irresponsible and humongously reproachable Ontario Rental Housing Tribunal,
Investigations and Enforcement Unit of the Ministry of Municipal Affairs and Housing, the
incomprehensible former Minister John Gerettsen, my MPP Julia Munro, Premier Dalton McGuinty, the
entire Legislature, York Regional Police, OPP and the Law Society of Upper Canada which he has
precedence second to the Minister of Justice and Attorney General of Canada that advises the Minister of
Public Safety presently my MP Peter Van Loan that is responsible to the people and Parliament for the
actions of the RCMP and ultimately they have all been informed as well as Parliament via Prime Minister
Stephen Harper prior to his coming into power and after causing him to enact the 2006 Accountability Act,
suggesting that none of them were ever responsible to put a system in place adept to the support of the
sanctity of the Constitution that within the provisions of the Charter guarantees every individual equal
protection and benefits.
It is the obviousness of their charlatan ways deliberately attentive to deception, prevarication, manipulation
and orchestration of illegitimate laws 180 degrees adverse to every individual’s guaranteed Charter rights
necessitating there persistent façade as a legitimate government to cover up the obvious fact that they are
“Criminal Frauds” that display a semblance to democracy in the Upper Tier so as to provide them all a fair
4
opportunity to assure the loot ransacked from the people of the Lower Tier is fairly distributed where there
is indeed “Honour Among Thieves”
Throughout my writings it is prudent to know the meaning of the following published words
Principles: main beliefs, values, philosophy, ideology, morality, ethics, doctrine, principle
Supremacy: pre-eminence, ascendancy, primacy, superiority, domination, incomparability, dominance
Charter: contract, licence, deed, agreement, bond, hire, rent, employ
Democracy: social equality, equality, egalitarianism
Egalitarianism: parity, fairness, equal opportunity, impartiality
Spirit: strength, courage, character, guts, will, strength of mind, Force, fortitude
Justice: fairness, impartiality, righteousness, even- handedness, fair dealing, honesty, integrity
Consistency: constancy, steadiness, reliability, uniformity, evenness, stability, regularity
Sanity: Good sense, wisdom, reason, understanding, common sense, sense, judgement.
Honourable: Admirable, worthy, praiseworthy, moral, principled, good, respectable, upright
Freedom: Liberty, autonomy, lack of restrictions, self determination, independence, choice, free will,
sovereignty.
Simplicity: Ease, straightforwardness, effortless, plainness, minimalism, unfussiness, cleanness
It is imperative and emphatically unequivocally prerequisite that the legal system personnel have
autonomy absolutely independent of any influence by any person or persons being stringently governed by
the Constitution conducive to every individual’s equally guaranteed Charter rights that demands
consistency in continuity to be administered and enforced by competent, responsible irreproachable
personnel with fortitude and conviction to the certainty of the sanctity of the Constitution and its people as
equally guaranteed in Perpetual Possessory Title since 1982 not subject to any limitations of time as the
nefarious bent would have us believe embedded in their modus operandi when caught with public pressure
put on them they simply enact illegitimate laws intended to smooth over their Criminal Actions while
attempting to protect themselves from the punishment due them inserting words limiting complaints to
those that occur after their fraudulent enactments that they never intend to enforce, with the Accountability
Act, 2006 a prime example superseding their most humongous Criminally Fraudulent Act, the Constitution
that includes the provisions of every individual’s equally guaranteed Charter rights that they never
intended to keep with the Accountability Act, 2006 indicative of the glaringly obvious.
SIMPLICITY
Due the innumerable happenstance of the innumerable realities that Reality as a whole contains I offer this
simple test so as not to further exasperate the heavily exasperated minds of the majority populace.
If we exist in a democracy governed by the Constitution that proclaims equality in the provisions of the
Charter where the people are allowed to vote for the people they would prefer to have represent them
determined by the majority vote where all persons are and must be presumed to be of the status of the
presumption of innocence in absence of reasonable evidence to suggest otherwise and all laws must be
consistently administered and enforced consistent with the Constitution that equally protects every
individual that competent responsible and irreproachable persons are prerequisite thus in, of and with “The
Spirit of the Law” whereas it is imperative that every individual be coherent to the laws with every reason
5
for the people to be informed as to the truth of evidence submitted to the authorities as well as their
decision, ultimately nothing to hide if in, of and with “The Spirit of the Law” so there SIMPLY should be
no reason in hell for the Information Commissioner of Canada and the Ontario personnel involved with the
Freedom of Information Act not to consult with each other for the express purpose to determine who is
responsible to provide the evidence that I requested.
RIGHT?
We who will see shall see, being no miracle chanced upon the visually impaired.
I should make note that the Ontario Freedom of Information Act is severely impaired under the guidance
of the chief conspirators “Ministry of the Attorney General” as all of reality and the extractions of excerpts
relative to my personal encounters with the nefarious bent of the Law Society propagates that the Attorney
General heads attests as is the predictably that the evidence against him will not be freely forthcoming
under the Freedom of Information Act.
Just as assuredly the Information Commissioner of Canada mandated under the authority of the federal
government will be not forthcoming with the evidence that ultimately proves the entire federal government
and the illegitimate legal system administered by the Minister of Justice and Attorney General of Canada
and enforced by RCMP Commissioner that Brian Mulroney absconded from the people mandating the
position as Deputy Minister replacing Zack the former RCMP Commissioner that publicly informed the
people in September 2000 that the government was being taken over by organized crime.
Poor Zack was not aware that the government had been taken over by organized crime in 1797 when the
Attorney General on behalf of the Upper Canada (Now Ontario) government met with a few of the self
proclaimed elite gentlemen to proclaim themselves a monopoly to propagate “Learned and Honourable”
gentlemen to administer the laws of Ontario that ultimately must be consistent with democracy, which
there simply is no evidence to support their claim to be the legitimate authority.
All of reality stands to attest against them awaiting the majority to overcome the serious affliction cast
upon them that will not allow them to perceive who it is that burdens them with a multitude of hardships
when it is only the Attorney Generals published as the powers that be, however puppets of the Criminally
Fraudulent governments that present themselves as representatives of the people, though there are no
pictures of them with their hands in the people’s pockets they most assuredly are there as certain as the
epitome of simplicity and sanity of “The Spirit of the Law” that is “The Spirit of the Golden Rule” has
forever blown in the wind seemingly just as invisible and invincible to the people they proclaim there is no
“2 Tier” system that begs the question “To whom do they of lofty tower proclaim”
For them who require the SIMPLICITY more SIMPLY defined I offer that the evidence requested would be
forthcoming if the government is not organized crime personified and the SIMPLE fact is either way, evidence
forthcoming or not will prove them to be precisely the Organized Criminal Frauds all of reality attests.
They are provided only two options; either put their actions where their mouths are where our money is and provide
the requested evidence proving they have nothing to hide that would unequivocally prove they should have hid it,
but are obviously “The epitome of incomprehensible imbeciles”
Or should they not provide the evidence as expected of a legitimate system with nothing to hide they will most
certainly remove the cloak they once hid behind.
6
We are proud as hell at Charter Democracy Force Justice Inc. to present the irrefutable evidence on behalf of the
Constitution and its people in assertion of every individual’s equally guaranteed Charter rights on the edge of the
opening of 1 LIFE being under construction by professional web developers initiating the ultimate security
warranted of the incalculatable value of the 2010 Membership Certificates that will be available to purchase for $20
from moment of opening to December 31 2009 when the “Suing Machine” that is 1 LIFE www.1life.cC commences
action to retrieve all the money for the people the Law Society propagates and their affluent and influential friends
ransacked from them.
Not a bad investment I would have to admit and I doubt that I can explain it any SIMPLER than that to the masses,
for innumerable reasons of innumerable happenstance none more unambiguously clear than the necessity of money
to sooth the inherent bias beast.
Any day now, though Monday or Tuesday are highly suspect to commence the
“2o bucks says we can have a True Democracy” 1 LIFE initiative.
Charter Democracy Force Justice Inc. will use the intake to simultaneously advertise 1 LIFE’s existence, the non-
debatable evidence of the government organized crime that will inevitably expose them for what they are invariably
inciting the majority to join with us and the minority to publicly support the most “Learned and Dishonourable” as
they always have proclaimed them Honourable providing them every opportunity to fair share when divvying up the
loot ransacked from the majority, thereby clearly exposing themselves for consumption of the “Suing Machine” that
gains power with every person that openly declares their insatiable appetite certain to be the bite that bit them in this
democracy where the people are coherent to the powers bestowed upon the majority when assembled and organized
in “The Spirit of the Law” that governs and protects us all even from the most ornery critters of the once invincible
charlatans of deception, prevarication, manipulation and orchestration that have blazed innumerable indelible trails
that provides them no escape from the looming fires.
If I were one of them I would immediately revert to “The Spirit of the Law” and hope like hell I will blend with the
smoke and dissipate rather than mix with the ashes.
Pages 9 and 10 were sent by registered mail and their acknowledgement of receipt will be published on the day of
the more than Grand Opening of 1 LIFE destined to sell innumerable I LIFE’s to both the deserving and the
incomprehensible that cannot resist any opportunity to satiate their insatiable lust for wealth and the power that once
came with it, however powerless when inevitable legitimate competent responsible irreproachable government/legal
system personnel rise from the ashes destined to perpetual fear of due punishment consistently administered to the
most deserving that would dare mess with the Perpetual Possessory Title of an individual’s guaranteed Charter rights
granted on the presumption one is of the status of the presumption of innocence in the absence of reasonable
evidence to suggest otherwise.
One SIMPLY can never over or under estimate the “Power of 20 Bucks” when equality is the name of the
reality, once thought to be a game akin to “Monopoly” of the over now under being consistently served
their comeuppance for crimes committed since the enactment of the 1982 Constitution.
7
Credos to the Astute Minority of the Moral Majority
Yes …certainly you are right, reality is the best place to observe and collect evidence when wanting to
prove a thing
http://www.scribd.com/doc/13093424/Osgoode-Hall-Behind-It-All
The Attorney General representing the Upper Canada (Now Ontario) government and a few elite met in
1797 to proclaim them selves a monopoly to propagate “Learned and Honourable” persons to administer
the laws of Ontario.
In a democracy the government personnel are elected by the people and presumed to represent them in
providing the necessities of a moral democratic society to the benefit of the populace where every
individual is considered equal and the government is responsible to ensure that every individual is fairly
treated equally protected and benefitted as it is the people that finance them to do so, whereas it is clearly
stated the Law Society must provide society competent responsible and irreproachable persons to
administer laws consistent with democracy.
With the enactment of the Constitution Act: 1982: Document the federal and provincial governments
guaranteed every individual’s equal democratic rights in the provisions of the Charter and the Ontario
Attorney General has the responsibility as the government chief legal advisor to advise the government
personnel consistent with the Constitution conducive to every individual’s guaranteed Charter rights.
As “guardian of the public interest” it is his responsibility to structure a legal system consistent with the
Constitution conducive to every individual’s guaranteed Charter rights and it is his personal responsibility
to ensure that every individual is equally protected by the Constitution: Establishment with the entire
system financed by the taxpayer being the only way to equally protect every individual as they guaranteed.
The fact is if the legal system was set up legally with competent responsible irreproachable personnel they
would be protecting every individual as guaranteed with minimum administrative and enforcement staff.
It is obvious they have used the taxpayers money to set up a private industry of purported to be legal
professionals that humongously profits by not protecting every individual equally as guaranteed and in fact
have a delineator they refer to as the “Threshold” based on financial matters whereas evidence against the
members of the Law Society and their affluent and influential friends is irrelevant, because obviously if
you were in the profession of organized crime and controlled the legal system it would be the height of
absurdity to put to words a due process of law to eradicate them and separate themselves from the
luxurious lifestyle they had put so much effort to tangle their web of deceit founded on the profession as
charlatans of deception, prevarication, manipulation and orchestration.
The private sector lawyer has no legal right to extort money from the public in an attempt to assert an
individual’s guaranteed Charter rights that are guaranteed in Perpetual Possessory Title as the majority of a
moral democratic society will assert if they had a moral democratic legal government.
The Law Society is simply the Ultimate PIG (Personal Interest Group) using the taxpayers money to
structure the system to their interests which is to ransack the people of the Lower Tier to just above
poverty aiding and abetting the corporate world that they have infested and invested to luxury.
8
The private sector thrives off the woes of society created by their members that infested the political and
legal system by deliberate negligence of their responsibility to protect us as guaranteed, “Learned and
Honourable” to their conspiracy, profiting by allowing and setting up individual’s to be victimized by
refusing to consistently punish attentive to deterrence..
34 Riverglen Drive
October 15 2009
Charter Democracy Force Justice Inc. Keswick, Ontario
L4P 2P8
T/F: 905-476-8959
The Information Commissioner of Canada www.cdfji.ca
1@cdfji.ca
Place de Ville, Tower B
112 Kent Street, 7th Floor
Ottawa, Ontario Frank Gallagher

Director/Operations
K1A 1H3
Re: Evidence RCMP refusal to investigate government organized crime.
Commission for Public Complaints finds them innocent when unequivocally guilty
Evidence Published www.charterdemocracyforce.ca
Dear Information Commissioner
On November 8 2007 I filed with the Commission for Public Complaints against the RCMP for refusing to
investigate the government organized crime of corruption and conspiracy: Evidence published on Charter
Democracy Force web site and affiliate sites referenced thereon.
On July 28 2008 the RCMP informed that Staff Sgt. R.B. MacAdam had completed the investigation after
near 9 months study of the evidence I provided.
On September 3 2008 RCMP Superintendent Robert Davis, District Commander of the GTA signed the
RCMP Final Letter of Disposition stating that though I had provided hundreds of pages of documents he
chose to ignore them in an attempt to slip out the back door on unfounded statements finding the RCMP
innocent of refusing to investigate the government organized crime of corruption and conspiracy while
signing the “Letter” admitting he refused to study the evidence.
(See pages 17 and 18)
I hereby make request you take the appropriate action to provide me with a copy of now RCMP NCO Staff
Sgt. R.B. MacAdam’s near nine months report of his study of the evidence of government organized crime
published on the Charter Democracy Force web sites.
After immediately attending to that please take appropriate action to ensure no government department,
agency or police with ever obstruct an individual from their right to obtain pertinent information consistent
with the certainty of their equally guaranteed Charter rights and inform me as to what action has been taken.
This document sent by registered mail is published on my Scribd site http://www.scribd.com/documents as

“Freedom of Information Request registered mail” with 170 pages attached for your study.
I have also filed the Access/Correction Request Form with the Ontario Government by registered mail (See
page 2)
Please consult with the Ontario Government Freedom of Information agency to avoid duplication of effort
and inform me as to who will be dealing with the issues requested.
Thank you
signed October 15 2009 9

Frank Gallagher
10
Yes I provided the credit card information
FG
11
12
From: Frank Gallagher [mailto:franklyone@hotmail.com]
Sent: September 25, 2008 3:15 PM
To: 'REVIEWS'
Subject: RE: Check: Correction
September 25 2008
Please make note of corrected date on page 4 of the Request Review of Complaint September 25 2008
document published on the RCMP Final Letter of Disposition web site
http://groups.google.com/group/charter-democracy-force
Excerpt from page 4 follows
False statements are underlined
Paragraphs
1) Complaint date November 7 2007 in error (False-November 8 2007)

2) The investigator also reviewed numerous documents found on my web sites in order to understand
the circumstances surrounding my complaint
That is what he stated in his May 20 2008 interim report
3) He has reviewed Staff Sergeant MacAdam’s report and wishes to share with me the results.
4) He emphasizes that despite the hundreds of pages of documentation involved in my complaint, the
RCMP’s sole mandate was to determine whether or not the members acted appropriately.
He is suggesting there is a difference as to how the evidence is examined. The evidence provided to
Sergeant Michael Thomson up to October 18 2007 when I met with Roy Steinebach is irrefutable to
the Government Organized Crime of corruption and conspiracy even though he refused to take the
evidence I brought to him that date he said he had access to the evidence that I had been sending to
Sergeant Michael Thomson’s e-mail address and I could continue to send evidence via the same
method, which I did and is all relevant up to the date I filed the complaint with the commission
November 8 2007. I presume he was instructed how to handle me before we met on October 7 2007,
(Correction: October 18 2007 not October 7 2007) perhaps a note on the file. As
far as Inspector Brian Verheul is concerned Superintendent Robert Davis states Inspector Verheul
instructed Sergeant Thomson and to how to deal with the evidence and is therefore responsible for
Sergeant Thomson’s actions. Inspector Brian Verheul had plenty of time to confirm whether or not
the evidence was relative to the Government Organized Crime of corruption and conspiracy. It is yet
to be determined if Inspector Verheul acted on his own or… consulted with his superiors.)
Please acknowledge
Frank Gallagher
13
From: REVIEWS [mailto:reviews@cpc-cpp.gc.ca]
To: franklyone@hotmail.com
Subject: RE: Check
This is to acknowledge receipt of your Request for a Review. You will be receiving a letter
shortly confirming your request.
Thank you.
Commission for Public Complaints Against the RCMP
Reviews & Investigations Unit
FAX #: 613-952-8045
TELEPHONE #: 1-800-267-6637
E-MAIL ADDRESS: reviews@cpc-cpp.gc.ca
From: Frank Gallagher [mailto:frank.gallagher@sympatico.ca]

To: REVIEWS
Subject: Check
September 23 2008 Frank Gallagher

34 Riverglen Drive
Commission for Public Complaints Against the Royal Canadian Mounted Police Keswick, On.
L4P 2P8
Canada Post: Bag Service 1722
905-476-8959
Ottawa, Ontario frank@cdf.name
K1P 0B3
Fax-613-952-8045 Manager
www.cpc.cpp.gc.ca Charter Democracy Force
www.cdf.name
Re: File No. PC-2007-2316
Re: Request Review of my Complaint

RCMP refuse to investigate
Government corruption and conspiracy
Dear Commission Representative
I have received the RCMP Final Letter of Disposition dated September 3 2008 signed by Superintendent
Robert Davis, District Commander, Greater Toronto Area and he informs if I wish to exercise my right to a
14
review of this investigation of my complaint I may do so by contacting the Commission for Public
Complaints Against the RCMP at Canada Post: Bag Service 1722, Fax-613-952-8045, and
www.cpc.cpp.gc.ca
I do wish to exercise my right to a review of this investigation of my complaint. I have had some
difficulties communicating with Andree Leduc, Enquiries and Complaints Analyst at the 7337 137 Street,
Suite 102, Surrey, British Columbia V3W 1A4 office so I am submitting this Request for Review of my
Complaint by both Fax-613-952-8045 and your on line form at www.cpc.cpp.gc.ca.
Andree Leduc will get the whole document by e-mail along with the rest on the AAAAALIST
All pertinent evidence regarding this Request for Review of my Complaint is published or referenced on
the “RCMP Final Letter of Disposition” http://groups.google.com/group/rcmp-final-letter-of-disposition
affiliate web site of the Charter Democracy Force
All evidence published on this site is pertinent including correspondence with Andree Leduc of your
Surrey, British Columbia Office.
The RCMP Final Letter of Disposition dated September 3 2008 implicates Inspector Robert Davis to be in
on the Government Organized Crime of corruption and conspiracy and the details are explained in
document “Request Review of Complaint September 23 2008” published on the aforementioned web site
of which this is the first page.
The links to the evidence originally published on the sites referenced in my original complaint to your office
November 8 2007 were corrupted so I opened a new site CDF Documents and transferred pertinent evidence there
informing Staff Sergeant R.B.MacAdam and everyone else published on the AAAAALIST
of the original Charter Democracy Force web site http://groups.google.com/group/charter-democracy-force The
CDF Documents web site can be accessed from this site. .
It would be prudent to mention that I have been providing the irrefutable evidence of Government Organized Crime
of corruption and conspiracy to Sergeant Michael Thomson of the Milton RCMP office since January 18 2006 when
he responded to the evidence I originally left with Inspector Peter Goulet of the Newmarket detachment dated
November 15 2005.
On January 3 2006 Inspector P. Goulet wrote to inform the evidence was originally reviewed by members of the
Federal Enforcement Section and it was learned I was concerned about possible offences under the Canada Business
Act.
The Act falls under the investigative mandate of the RCMP Commercial Crime Section also located in Newmarket
and was being forwarded on to them for review.
I had indeed originally requested the RCMP address the relative issues regarding my former tenant Don Wilson
president and director of Bio Safe under the Canada Business Corporations Act, Part XIX Paragraph 229 (1)
having already attempted to get the York Regional Police to deal with Don Wilson under the Criminal Code and
Tenant Protection Act, 1997 but they declined to do so.
By the time I went to the RCMP with the November 15 2005 cover letter and evidence I had already tried several
government departments to address the issues that occurred June 30 2005 at the ORHT but to no avail, so that is the
reason I presented the issues in different manner under the Canada Business Act to try my luck that way.
This is all documented on the Golden Rule for Society …Gold for Law Society web site
http://groups.google.com/group/golden-rule-for-society---gold-for-law-society-
under the heading Royal Canadian Mounted Police Compiled A – C documents now available on the
“RCMP Final Letter of Disposition” web site along with other pertinent evidence.
15
You must remember I was just a victim experienced in another field of endeavour with no experience in how the
police carried on business at the time and simply provided the evidence that crimes had been committed by my
former tenant and president of a company that I had invested in and thought they would be dealt with by
professional people in these matters not realizing I had to dot (t) s and cross (i) s and follow procedures I was not
aware of or experienced in.
I was under the opinion at the time that the people financed all government personnel involved in the administration
and enforcement of the law to be proficient competent responsible and irreproachable with fortitude and conviction
to the safety and wellbeing of every individual as guaranteed by the Charter of equal protection and benefits
consistent with the Constitution and the Police Services Act.
My opinion has never wavered.
Police Services Act

R.S.O. 1990, CHAPTER P.15
PoliceServicesAct.doc
Declaration of principles
1. Police services shall be provided throughout Ontario in accordance with the following principles:
1. The need to ensure the safety and security of all persons and property in Ontario.
1. The importance of safeguarding the fundamental rights guaranteed by the Canadian Charter of
Rights and Freedoms and the Human Rights Code.
2. The need for co-operation between the providers of police services and the communities they
serve.
4. The importance of respect for victims of crime and understanding of their needs.
It is all about common sense and the law, not aware at the time the absence of it throughout the personnel
of the system but with further thought and reason determined it was too consistent to be incompetence and
eventually proved it was deliberate organized crime of corruption and conspiracy by members of the Law
Societies beginning in the very first line of the Charter, all documented on the web sites.
The Sergeant Michael Thomson e-mail dated January 18 2006 specifically states that I proposed an
investigation be undertaken utilizing the auspices of the Canada Business Act and as such investigated the
evidence
This information is all published on my web sites that RCMP Staff Sergeant Bob MacAdam investigated
and states in his interim report dated May 20 2008 that he felt he should be thorough and thoughtful when
forming conclusions based on the relevant evidence.
Since Superintendent Robert Davis, District Commander, Greater Toronto Area does not comprehend the
need to be competent responsible and irreproachable with fortitude and conviction for the safety and
wellbeing of every individual as guaranteed by the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms nor is he
competent to command a police force consistent with the Police Services Act I will just address the issues
he stated in his September 3 2008 Final Letter of Disposition, which is self-evident
In such serious matters of government organized crime of corruption and conspiracy well documented and
filed with you on November 8 2007 and studied by Staff Sergeant Bob MacAdam in a manner he felt was
thorough and thoughtful when forming conclusions based on the relevant evidence as he states in his
interim report dated May 20 2008, and finally completed on July 11 2008 as stated in the letter from the
Professional Standards Unit signed by Sergeant Karen Delorey, after 8 months of studying the prodigious
amount of irrefutable evidence of government organized crime of corruption and conspiracy published on
16
my web sites that had been provided to Inspector Brian Verheul, Milton detachment via e-mail addressed
to Sergeant Michael Thomson since January 18 2006 it is incomprehensible that the final 2 page report
dated September 3 2008 by Superintendent Robert Davis only contained a little more than one page of
relative text, especially since he states Staff Sergeant R.B. MacAdam was a veteran investigator.
It states in the Commission for Public Complaints Against the RCMP pamphlet Andree Leduc mailed me
when confirming my complaint that if the CPC carries out a further investigation an investigator will
gather all the information relevant to the complaint and will conduct interviews with me, the RCMP
members(s) involved, and any witnesses.
The pertinent evidence is published on my Charter Democracy Force web sites aforementioned and the
report by Staff Sergeant R.B. MacAdam is now pertinent evidence having spent 8 months studying the
evidence thorough and thoughtful and of course he is a pertinent witness to attest that the report the RCMP
present at the review is in fact the report that he prepared for the investigation of the complaint.
Superintendent Robert Davis is also a pertinent witness to attest that the final report he sent me after 1 ¾
months reviewing Staff Sergeant R.B. MacAdam’s report is indeed the report he prepared.
I ask that you immediately request a copy of Staff Sergeant R.B. MacAdam’s report to ensure no
time is allowed for a fixed new replacement report.
A copy of Superintendent Robert Davis’s report is enclosed.
It is within your competence to determine if they are consistent with each other.
Address of contents of Superintendent Robert Davis dated September 3 2008
False statements are underlined

Paragraphs
1) Complaint date November 7 2007 in error (False-November 8 2007)

2) The investigator also reviewed numerous documents found on my web sites in order to understand
the circumstances surrounding my complaint
That is what he stated in his May 20 2008 interim report
3) He has reviewed Staff Sergeant MacAdam’s report and wishes to share with me the results.
Correction: October 18 2007 not October 7 2007
perhaps a note on the file. As far as Inspector Brian Verheul is concerned Superintendent Robert
Davis states Inspector Verheul instructed Sergeant Thomson and to how to deal with the evidence
and is therefore responsible for Sergeant Thomson’s actions. Inspector Brian Verheul had plenty of
time to confirm whether or not the evidence was relative to the Government Organized Crime of
17
corruption and conspiracy. It is yet to be determined if Inspector Verheul acted on his own or…
consulted with his superiors.)
It is superfluous to just stick with the complaint I filed November 8 2007 against Sergeant Roy
Steinebach and Inspector Brian Verheul. They have some splainin to do as does Superintendent
Robert Davis that will inevitably lead to their superiors.
I complained of Government corruption and conspiracy and they refused to investigate, and when
Staff Sergeant R.B. MacAdam investigated the evidence thorough and thoughtful when forming
conclusions based on the relevant evidence, in order to determine which was relevant he had to be
thorough and thoughtful as he stated he was.
That remains to be seen but Superintendent Robert Davis’s report is self- evident he is not.
I reiterate all police have a responsibility to be consistent with the Police Services Act and the
Constitution conducive to every individual’s guaranteed Charter rights of equal protection and
benefits and it is each person’s superior that is responsible to see that they are competent
responsible and irreproachable with fortitude and conviction to every individual as guaranteed with
particular attention to victims, attentive to any flaws in the system that should be addressed to
prevent such reoccurrences to some other individual.
Police Services Act

serve.
Obviously Inspector Robert Davis has insulted my intelligence and demonstrated his
incompetence for success as either the bad or good guy.
You will see in many of my writings I presumed the RCMP Commissioner William Elliot had
been consulted and it was he who actually is behind the refusal to investigate along with
Minister of Public Safety and so on right up to the DOJ and higher.
5) Staff Sergeant MacAdam’s investigation revealed when I attended the Toronto North Detachment
on October 18 2007 and met with Sergeant Steinbach, it was not to make a new complaint but
rather to provide more documents with respect to the same complaint I had previously made to the
Commercial Crime Section (CCS). I was advised in 2006 that CCS would not be investigating this
complaint and I was provided with the rationale for that decision being informed the Department of
Justice had been consulted prior to responding to me.
As previously stated only the first file I provided to Inspector Peter Goulet dated November 15
2005 made reference to the Canada Business Act issues that Sergeant Michael Thomson
addressed in his report on January 18 2006.
18
From then on it was all about Government Organized Crime of corruption
and conspiracy and the refusal of the YRP, OPP, RCMP and many
government departments and agencies to deal with the issues which led to
the Ontario Attorney General who advises them all and he is the “guardian
of the public interest” which he refuses to guard.
5a) Sergeant Steinbach declined to take more documents and explained the CCS Intake process to
me.
I printed out the evidence to take down to him because the RCMP web site stated they do not
take evidence by e-mail.
He refused to take the evidence stating he already had it because the evidence I had been
sending via Sergeant Michael Thomson’s e-mail address was being kept on file and he
already had a copy of the recording of the ORHT hearing that I provided with the November
15 2005 evidence I gave toInspector Peter Goulet.
5b) He did however tell me that he felt that my complaint was too vague and over reaching
and that it did not meet the CCS Investigational mandate.
He refused to look at the evidence I brought with me and the evidence on the web sites is
not vague at all.
He did not state the evidence was vague and over reaching and the evidence irrefutably
proves his opinion as to the relevancy of Government Organized Crime of corruption and
conspiracy is valueless and I suspect that he is not all that familiar with the file and was
just acting on instructions.
5c). He also told me that there was already a file open regarding my allegations and went on to
explain that it did not necessarily mean that the RCMP was going to investigate the complaint.
(Sergeant Steinbach told me for certain the RCMP was not going to investigate the complaint)
6) Inspector Verheul did not deal with me directly, but he did provide direction to Sergeant
Thomson, my principle contact person, that if material being submitted continues to relate to the
issues already reviewed then nothing further should be done than to place a copy of the
correspondence on the file.
As previously mentioned Inspector Verheul is responsible for Sergeant Thomson’s actions and when I
brought the matter to his attention prior to filing the complaint he should have looked into it and he has
had plenty of time since as he has been provided all the evidence the same as the rest of the people
whose e-mail addresses are in the AAAAAALIST document published on the original Charter
Democracy Force web site
7) In the course of his investigation Staff Sergeant MacAdam also determined that my initial
complaint involving my investment in Mr. Wilson’s company and the Ontario Rental Housing and
Tenant’s Act dispute was reviewed and that I was advised in writing that the matter was most
appropriately handled through the civil provisions provided for in the noted statute and that no
criminal investigation would be undertaken
I presume reference is being made to Sergeant Michael Thomson’s January 18 2006 e-mail again.
He has to fill in the report somehow. Heaven knows I am not referring to reiterations being particularly
reiterative myself. I am noting the struggle to put something to paper that looks legitimately convincing.
8) When I was not satisfied with that response I wrote back the same day and Sergeant Thomson
19
wrote his second letter dated February 7th 2006, further explaining that if I suspect criminal
activity, the police service with primary jurisdiction would be responsible for investigating the
allegations and it seems the Ontario Provincial Police had also reviewed my complaint and had
referred me to the York Regional Police as the police services of jurisdiction. It was established
as well that I had met with the YRP previously and was told that the matter was civil and that
they would not be conducting an investigation.
I do not seem to have a copy of that letter in my computer files, perhaps in my 3’ stack of hard copy but
it is irrelative.
The police sent me in circles as to who had the authority whereas the YRP was the original police force
of jurisdiction but they have persistently refused to look into the Government Organized Crime of
corruption and conspiracy, the same as the OPP and the RCMP whereas they all have been provided
the same evidence.
1) After careful consideration of the details surrounding my complaint, he finds no evidence that
indicates that Sergeant Steinebach or Inspector Verheul acted improperly and furthermore he
supports Inspector Verheul’s directives, given the nature of the file and the documentation being
provided.
There you have it, after careful consideration he finds no evidence that indicates that Sergeant
Steinebach or Inspector Verheul acted improperly and further more he supports Inspector Verheul’s
directives.
Was it he Superintendent Robert Davis, District Commander Greater Toronto Area that gave the order
not to investigate? Was it an obvious decision for him? Did he need to bother consulting with his
superiors?
That is yet to be determined!!
2) If I wish to exercise my right to a review of this investigation of my complaint I may do so by

contacting the CPU at the Ottawa office
Of course I wish to exercise my right!!!

That is what this all about. Right?
I see Inspector Brian Verheul is retired now (bottom of his 2nd page).
Before Staff Sergeant R.B. MacAdam finished the investigation he was provided a new job( See his
May 20 2008 interim report) with NCO i/c after his name as Occupational Health and Safety
Services “O” Division/ Return to Work/Medical Discharge Facilitator of Occupational Health and
Safety Services “O” Division
As predictable as the likelihood of people becoming victims with government members of the Law
Societies holding every position of authority in the legal system who are not required to give a damn
about every individuals guaranteed Charter rights of equal protection and benefits nor is the Law
Society of Upper Canada required to examine evidence provided in support of complaints against
their members.
See the 2 part Law Society of Upper Canada document published on the original Charter
Democracy Force web site.
CanLaw National Lawyer Referral Service confirmed this on their web site www.canlaw.com
and I copied other evidence from their site, which they were not too happy about which you will see
published on the Charter Democracy Force web site.
20
All evidence referred herein is published on the Charter Democracy Force web sites and was e-mailed
to everyone on the aforementioned AAAAAALIST and they were provided with the web site addresses
they would be published on.
**********************************************************************************
It is predictable you of the Commission for Public Complaints Against the RCMP will be orchestrated by
the superiors of the Government Organized Crime of corruption and conspiracy as it is apparent they
already caused Andree Leduc to not cooperate with me.
You will find that information on the “RCMP Final Letter of Disposition” web site or referenced where
you will find all the evidence stated herein, and quite probably more.
The evidence is irrefutable of the Government Organized Crime of corruption and conspiracy and with the
RCMP Final Letter of Disposition dated September 3 2008 they are securely implicated in the conspiracy.
Now it is your turn to provide us the irrefutable evidence of the Commission for Public Complaints
Against the RCMP for the public to see which you really have no choice but to cooperate with the
conspiracy or cooperate consistent with the Constitution conducive to every individual’s guaranteed
Charter rights.
Of course this document will be e-mailed to everyone on the AAAAALIST and many others.
I will expect acknowledgement of receipt of the first page of this document informing you where the rest
of it is published and the other pertinent evidence.
Should you have any problems with the links to the documents or web sites please do not hesitate to
contact me at frank@cdf.name
The same if you need any help understanding the evidence or should you require more evidence, anything
at all please do not hesitate to contact me.
Frank Gallagher
Manager
Charter Democracy Force
PS
You have more than enough to demand a Public Inquiry if you can find someone you can demand.
Perhaps you can find a way to get the information to the media.
You will read throughout the correspondence every government department and agency suggesting I get a
lawyer and deal with my personal issues, as they like to say, in civil court.
The July 26 2008 Saturday Star headlined the serious situation that the Middle Class cannot afford to
access the civil courts costing $60,000 for 3 days and the media who are on the AAAALIST have also
been provided the evidence of precisely what I informed them more than three years ago which they
attempt to orchestrate themselves out of this one.
Invariably everything they do is corrupt and they have no choice but to continue in their ways when they
are confronted but the jig is up.
21
There is always the option of finally doing things legal consistent with the Constitution conducive to every
individual’s guaranteed Charter rights.
That would require restructuring and come right out and fess the truth something they are not familiar with
so it could be somewhat clumsy.
From : Michael Thomson <Michael.Thomson@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>

Sent : January 18, 2006 12:51:19 PM
To : <franklyone@hotmail.com>
CC : "Mona Eichmann" <Mona.Eichmann@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>
Subject : BioSafe Natural Products Inc./ Bio-Safe Natural TechnologiesInc.
Dear Mr. Gallagher:
22
I have reviewed the documents, forwarded to our office here, that were submitted to our
Newmarket Detachment. You have proposed an investigation be undertaken utilizing the auspices of
the Canada Business Corporations Act,Chapter C-44 (CBCA) and as such, this matter has been taken
by our office for review.
A review of the matter has been completed and the Department of Justice (DOJ) has been
consulted in terms of prosecution under the jurisdiction of this Act.
Unfortunately, Part XIX, and Section 229(1) CBCA and thereafter of the Act is quite specific in
the terms of the investigation and enforcement of same. This is entirely a civil procedure that
requires the Court to issue an Investigation Order and thereafter appoint an Inspector. The
Inspector has specific authorization allowing entry and examination of the corporation's books
and records. These duties are outlined in Section 130(1) CBCA. Part XIX.1 outlines the
apportioning of the award of damages, and Part XX outlines remedies, offences and punishment.
Mr. Donald WILSON's assertions that a subpoena and/or a search warrant are required in order to
allow the shareholders to review the companies' books and records are erroneous, as outlined in
Section 21 (1-10) CBCA.
It is the judgment of DOJ and this office that this matter lies solely within the confines of
civil litigational procedures, and as such, DOJ will not consider prosecuting this matter and no
investigation will be undertaken by this office. An attempt has been made to verbally convey this
message via telephone, however the number provided appears to be the number of a fax machine. The
information provided will be kept on file for intelligence/ information purposes only. If you
have any further questions, these may be directed to the Writer at
the numbers listed below.
Yours truly,
M.J. Thomson, Sgt.

NCO i/c Central Intake & Admin. Support.
Greater Toronto Area - Commercial Crime Section,
Milton, Ontario
(905) 876-9656
(905) 876-9757 (Fax)
michael.thomson@rcmp-grc.gc.ca

Sent: September 18, 2008 8:21 AM
To: 'complaints@cpc-cpp-gc.ca'
Subject: FW: Request Review of Complaint
September 18, 2008

Andree Leduc
I have not yet received acknowledgement of receipt of the e-mail I sent September 11 2008.
Please respond as to what actions you have taken regarding these most serious issues.
23
Thank you
Frank Gallagher
Manager

To: 'complaints@cpc-cpp-gc.ca'
Subject: Request Review of Complaint
September 11 2008
Commission for Public Complaints Against The Royal Canadian Mounted Police
7337 137 Street, Suite 102
Surrey, British Columbia V3W 1A4
Fax 604-501-4095
complaints@cpc-cpp-gc.ca
Attention Andree Leduc

Enquiries and Complaints Analyst
Frank Gallagher
Re: File No. PC-2007-2316 Manager
Re: File No. PC-2007-2317 Charter Democracy Force
Re: Request Review of Complaint
Dear Andree Leduc
I hope you will be more cooperative than when you last wrote in December 2007 and refused to respond to my
several attempts to have you confirm that you will and make some effort to be competent when this inevitable day
arrived to request a review of my complaint against the RCMP as I am not satisfied with their deliberate
incompetence consistent with the government organized crime of corruption and conspiracy.
Given the evidence and particular circumstances it would ne naïve of me to believe anything other than you are
under the thumb of the major players of the conspiracy but never the less I must go through the motions following
the modus operandi of the government documenting every step of the way for both present and future use.
.You will notice how FFF, Forthright Forthcoming and Forthwith I endeavour to be expecting the same in return and
of course when not, it is painfully obvious and though I would prefer appropriate action from you I have learned to
settle for more evidence as if I didn’t have enough already.
From the tone of my writing it is hoped you will comprehend that what concerns me does concern you one way or
another and all I can do is hope that you understand that I am a victim requesting justice as detailed on the Charter
Democracy Force web site www.cdf.name and 10 affiliate sites although in reference to the evidence originally
attached to the complaints you will find it on the original Charter Democracy Force site
There is sufficient evidence there that demands the RCMP look into in the 15 Lawyer Files and the Mad, Glad
mostly Sad….Why document that asks many questions Why that need to be formally answered even though they
answer themselves.
I have made note of some very significant serious problems within the upper command of the RCMP in the
following pages, which includes a copy of their Final Letter of Disposition dated September 3 2008.
24
I believe considering your admittance of incompetence that this is a case of rare circumstance and at the
discretion of the Chair of the CPC request the CPC become involved and conduct its own investigation in
the public interest or conduct a public interest hearing or both.
Please acknowledge receipt and your intent to cooperate
Thank you
Frank Gallagher
September 11 2008
Confucius 551 BC – 479 BC
Golden Rule
“Do not impose on others what you would not wish for yourself”
25
“There were no dates in this history, but scrawled this way and that across every page were the words BENEVOLENCE,
RIGHTEOUSNESS and MORALITY …finally I began to make out what was written between the lines; the whole volume was
filled with a single phrase: EAT PEOPLE”
Jesus
“Do unto others as you would have them do unto you”
Jonathan Swainger
University of British Columbia history professor
Edmund Morgan’s compelling book “Inventing the People: The Rise of Popular Sovereignty in England and
America” opens with an assertion that the success of any form of government requires the acceptance of a number of
fictions. In democracies for example, it is necessary for the population to “believe” that the people have a voice or…
that the representatives of the people are the people”
Frank 1942 AD – 200_
Manager, Charter Democracy Force
When truth of a CONSISTENCY to a thing is the ultimate quest, the thing is self-evident even though supported by
only one statement is self sufficient, impervious to any number of CONSISTENCIES of truths that do not maintain a
CONSISTENCY with the thing .
When all is said and done and such inconsistency remains adverse to the CONSISTENCY of the thing deception and
prevarication is self-evident.
When persons develop prevarication to perfection they invariably deceive themselves making them inane
to any purpose vulnerable to sane purpose of humongous advantage to the Charter Democracy Force
maintaining CONSISTENCY to a thing fair and relevant to all of the moral society of the Constitution of
the democracy of Canada where eradication of amoral inclination is its purpose.
26
The painful obviousness of that which is predictable becomes pathetically more nauseating when proven true.
One charged with a crime can not be judged by the amoral and most definitely not by oneself.
CONSISTENCY to evade the purpose of truth

with irrelevant unfounded truths consistently
reveals the truth whether they are truths or lies
where Reality is the truth impervious to
perception yet precisely due to perception.
When ones mandate is to meet with a person

to pay them back $5 owed and finds them
lying in the street in pain a competent report
on the incident, no matter how thorough to
mandated purpose should include mention of
the victim, how he or she got there, and what
initiatives were taken to secure their safety
and wellbeing and was there any obvious
hazards that could be removed to ensure no
reoccurrence.
Due diligence to a purpose when the safety

and wellbeing of every individual is severely
jeopardized weighs heavy on the ability of an
authority assigned responsibility and the
report is self-evident
27
28
Priority
Police Services Act

serve.
In which way does a preponderance of paper proliferated with words protect every individual as
guaranteed by the Charter?
Of what purpose are such words and those found in the Constitution if staff is without principles?
and equal benefit of the law without discrimination and, in particular, without discrimination based
on race, national or ethnic origin, colour, religion, sex, age or mental or physical disability.
Incompetence is a relatively simple matter to deal with when competence is the quest by all concerned
Deliberate incompetence is a simpler matter to deal with when incompetence is the quest by all concerned
When there is an obvious CONSISTENCY of incompetence it could very well be the person who
perceives the CONSISTENCY of incompetence to be obvious is personally consistently incompetent.
52. (1) The Constitution of Canada is the supreme law of Canada, and any law that is inconsistent
with the provisions of the Constitution is, to the extent of the inconsistency, of no force or effect.
Considering every individual’s safety and well being is at stake consistent CONSISTENCY of those
people assigned the responsibility to protect every individual equally as guaranteed is mandatory either
stated or implied.
Similarly and most assuredly government personnel financed to administer and enforce the provisions of
the Constitution must be competent responsible and irreproachable in continuity with fortitude and
conviction meaning they must be aware of their legitimate purpose and the serious ramifications upon
society should the CONSISTENCY not be consistently monitored and maintained.
The consequences of neglect are of the most serious nature to the public interest and most assuredly the
Attorney General of Ontario is the “guardian of the public interest” as the “Roles and Responsibilities of
the Attorney General” published on the Ontario web site attests.
29
CONSISTENCY is also prerequisite in the safety and wellbeing of personnel involved in the government
organized crime of corruption and conspiracy.
The evidence published on the Charter Democracy Force was collected by me Frank Gallagher who
became lucidly alert on June 30 2005 at an Ontario Rental Housing Tribunal hearing to the fact I had been
victimized by my former tenant DON Wilson president of a company I had invested in.
Over a period of three years I presented the irrefutable evidence of the crimes to a preponderance of
prominent government personnel, media and others whose e-mail addresses in the AAAAALIST document
are published on the original Charter Democracy Force web site
The CONSISTENCY of their do not give a damn attitude about the Constitution and the individual’s equal
guaranteed Charter rights indicative of the spirit that emanates from the Law Society of Upper Canada
demonstrated in the 2 part Law Society of Upper Canada document is overwhelming and pathetically
incomprehensible in terms of incompetence and ignorance to legitimate purpose.
So overwhelming that stretches far beyond the realm that such incompetence could be achieved naturally
and already certain there was much more to this than meets the eye turned my efforts to divulge the root of
the problem that led me right back to that which was immediately apparent at the beginning that the office
of the Attorney General of Ontario was behind it all, being advisor to the Minister of Municipal Affairs
and Housing John Gerretsen who was responsible to monitor compliance with the Tenant Protection Act,
1997 but demonstrated an irresponsible indifference to his responsibility.
This is all detailed in the 15 Lawyer Files, which we are all quite familiar with by now. Right?
Well to save me time and everyone else concerned the evidence published on the Charter Democracy
Force irrefutably proves the incompetence of the entire legal system to protect every individual equally as
guaranteed by the Charter but at the same time demonstrates an uncanny CONSISTENCY to protect every
individual involved in the conspiracy from the people adverse to the moral legitimate purpose that they
have the people “believe”
So CONSISTENT and so obvious that any sane person of moral thought and reason can discern the truth
that what we have here in Canada is government organized crime personified.
The RCMP who studied the evidence since I filed with the Commission for Public Complaints against the
RCMP November 8 2007 not November 7 2007 as suggested in their “Final Letter of Disposition had to
wade through the evidence which was apparently either over their heads or was simply of no concern to
them as they did their Law Society rendition of pathetic injustice oblivious to “The Spirit of the Law” and
the vital role evidence plays.
Well, the RCMP had an opportunity to show their stuff and blew it miserably incompetent to the
conspiracy and most assuredly no semblance at all to what is expected of a competent responsible
irreproachable entity of fortitude and conviction in continuity to support a moral society conducive to
every individual’s guaranteed equal Charter rights.
Such lame excuses to avoid addressing the major issues and even in what amounts to a one full page of
response maintains an inconsistency with actual fact, but then competence to any purpose is not expected
of them from their superiors so what you see is what you get and the public has no choice but to forget it
and move on to retain their sanity.
30
Perhaps all the inconsistencies are deliberately entered to draw ones attention to them and would be of no
avail to argue, petty in nature distracting from the obvious serious issues they obviously never intend to
address.
Perhaps they are intended to infuriate me so I will respond insanely providing them opportunity to divert
the issues to a mental instability.
Well, that does not work absolutely inane to competent responsible irreproachable sane moral purpose.
Reality is the truth impervious to perception yet precisely due to perception
The truth cannot change but perceptions are vulnerable and fickle things.
They will allow you to believe you are cunning intelligent above many, provide you confidence and
arrogance…and stuff like that.
Simple fact is it will betray you.
Do not believe?
Have a serious look at the Final Letter of Disposition from the point of view of an individual of the moral
majority who once believed their Charter rights secure and were treated fairly as if in a democracy.
The government organized crime has clearly been proven to be initiated at the top but its success is
dependent on the ignorance and cooperation of the ROYAL CANADIAN MOUNTED POLICE.
As the economy gets worse nature will take its course has history attests and be assured we of the Charter
Democracy Force will humongously increase our efforts to the resolve necessary to prevention of the
predictable unnecessary chaos.
One has to wonder if terrorists is just a word attached to groups who are well aware that sane peaceful
initiatives to fair sane moral purpose of sane moral thought and reason is impossible with greedy imbeciles
devoid of conscience inept to sane moral thought and reason.
It seems to me the manipulative abilities of international corporate conglomerates and the humongous
advantage the affluent and influential have illegitimately over the people of the Lower Tiers the World
Trade Center was a likely target when the people are driven insane by the insanity of it all left unchecked.
Anyway, the people have a right to know what is published on the Charter Democracy Force web site and
with phase one now complete with the irrefutable evidence the upper echelon of the RCMP are involved
we can now direct our efforts full time to spreading the truth and we thank you for that for making it so
vividly clear.
This document “ReceivedSeptember102008” will be published in its appropriate place on the “RCMP
Final Letter of Disposition” web site http://groups.google.com/group/rcmp-final-letter-of-disposition
I need not mention how severely disappointed we are at but nothing we had not expected and certainly
nothing we were not prepared for.
31
We will give the Commission for Public Complaints against the RCMP one more opportunity to
demonstrate their incompetence to serve the people consistent with the Constitution and of course make a
formal request to the RCMP Commissioner to investigate the government organized crime as evidenced on
the Charter Democracy Force web site www.cdf.name which Robert Davis, Superintendent, District
Commander, Greater Toronto Area was kind enough to admit as did Staff Sergeant R.B. MacAdam that
you have possession of the evidence or access of all the evidence on the web sites but have chosen to
ignore it with blinders on and chose to emphasize your sole mandate was to determine whether or not the
members acted appropriately
This is how my first conversation with Staff Sergeant R.B. MacAdam began when he phoned me to see if I
would come down to the Newmarket office to discuss the complaint and now 10 months later the
incompetence remains..
It was about 3 weeks after he began looking into it on a part time basis he informed and at first I agreed to
go down, but when I asked if he had looked at the evidence on the web site he said no, he was just
investing the complaint against the RCMP members.
He had not yet talked to the 2 RCMP members and not looked at the evidence and he wants me to come
down.
I questioned how could he possibly determine if they acted appropriately with out looking at the evidence
and of course the Law Society of Upper Canada is of the belief their member acted appropriately without
looking at the evidence and we see a significant CONSISTENCY throughout that evidence appears to be
irrelevant when members of the Law Societies are involved as the Attorney General who plays a major
role advising all government departments and agencies.
I told him he would first have to determine if the evidence was valid to the complaint or considered trivial,
frivolous or vexatious which I cited from the Complaints Commission brochure.
You state Staff Sergeant R.B. MacAdam is a veteran investigator which hardly supports your intended
purpose when logically in the peoples minds evidence plays a major role in investigations and if your
veteran investigators are not aware the public are in serious trouble.
OOPS: They are in serious trouble aren’t they?
All that has been noted is the pathetic incompetence of the person assigned to the investigation and for that
he gets a promotion and I can expand that to see how you made it to District Commander.
There can be no doubt you are aware of the conspiracy because you would have to be an imbecile not to
understand what is going on if you are familiar with the evidence.
Of course that has crossed my mind in earlier writings that for the government organized crime to be
successful persons in you positions have to be selected from the incompetent or cooperative to the
conspiracy permitting its persistent existence.
You have made reference to issues being discussed with the DOJ, which is absurd as the evidence clearly
shows the DOJ and the Minister of Justice and Attorney General of Canada are major players in the
conspiracy.
32
I know it appears that I am addressing these issues to you in an effort to make you people understand the
error of your ways but we know you are well aware, however it is imperative the public clearly
understands and it is to that endeavour I am most attentive.
I presume your efforts are addressed similarly and I have to inform you the intended recipients of this
information are hardly as dumb as they would have to be to comprehend any reason for you not to act on
their behalf consistent with the Constitution.
Meanwhile I am requesting every recipient to jump in and act appropriately on behalf of the people in
legitimate support of the sanctity of the Canadian Constitution.
The inane dribble you offered as a competent responsible irreproachable response may well be what you
believe but as always evidence begets the truth and you people simply must familiarize yourselves with the
concept.
You state Sergeant Steinbach told me what my complaint was too vague which is utter nonsense but I
know after 10 months study of the evidence that is so overwhelming with nothing left to debate and out of
hundreds of pages of evidence you had to at least fill one page with something and why not utter crap that
comes so readily.
Given the most serious nature of the issues it is incomprehensible to suggest every (i) should be dotted and
(t) s crossed where if you were the competent responsible irreproachable people with fortitude and
conviction to every individual’s guaranteed Charter rights you would have laid out the red carpet and
thanked me for all the investigative work I did to help you better serve the public interest and Attorney
General Chris Bentley “guardian of the public interest” should have been pleased if not for the fact he is
the major player along with the DOJ.
You mentioned I was provided with the rationale back in 2006, January as I recall and that was an entirely
different matter when after the York Regional Police demonstrated their incompetence to deal with the
issues as well as many other government personnel I thought I would try in addition to address the matter
under the Corporations Act….whatever they call it further demonstrating Don Wilson’s character but
Sergeant Thomson pulled one of your tricks emphasizing that he was addressing the issues that I had
presented back in November 2005 I believe it was, maybe early December under the auspices of the
Corporations Act …whatever but since then I have provided the RCMP a preponderance of irrefutable
evidence of government organized crime if you care to stay to pertinent point, and it was delivered by e-
mail via the Michael Thomson e-mail address and Sergeant Roy Steinbach acknowledged they had the
evidence on file including a disk recording of the Tribunal hearing.
That is why he refused to accept the evidence I brought down because he stated they already had it.
Everything I am stating now is just reiterating the prodigious amount of reiterations published on the web
sites and all you have demonstrated is your incoherence to the evidence and your irresponsible attitude
towards the necessity of a responsible investigation on behalf of the people.
I have no further interest in addressing the crapola contained with your Final Letter of Disposition
when the evidence published on the web sites bares the truth and your report bares the truth of the
incompetent and irresponsible ineptness of the RCMP to protect the people as guaranteed by the Charter
when you make every effort to avoid the truth that lies within the evidence you stumbled over looking for
something to put in your one page letter of content.
33
Well the evidence stands for itself, not debateable and yet fools rush in to give it a try.
Gee, that segues me to the Commission for Public Complaints against the RCMP who were kind enough to
explain their incompetence and were determined not to get any wiser, no matter how hard I tried.
I informed them this day would come and if they had of started getting prepared back in December 2007
they would be competently prepared so now we get to see the results.
Why would they want the public to know they are incompetent?
Don’t answer, we know don’t we?
They really are cooperative with the conspiracy but they were hired specifically for their incompetence.
Anyway I leave you all to ponder your decisions while we test the Complaints Commission.
Frank Gallagher
Manager
PS
I did make mention I am not satisfied with your incompetent irresponsible trivial, frivolous vexatious Final
Letter of Disposition didn’t I?
I suppose the obvious does not require the formality.
If I seem a little frustrated and perhaps a bit irate perhaps if we looked at the evidence we could determine
the cause and help me out.
OOPS, silly me, I keep forgetting you are not required to give a damn but when the opportunity arises
make a kind gesture.
One more time I state unless the evidence that had been provided to the RCMP up until October 18 2007
has been thoroughly examined as to its validity of the charges of government organized crime of
corruption and conspiracy the RCMP have demonstrated their incompetence to protect the public interest.
Obviously the District Commander provides a good example of the incompetence that must ran rampant
throughout the force.
We cannot have that can we?
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
November 4 2008
To: Reviews
reviews@cpc-cpp.gc.ca
AAAAALIST
Re: File Nos. PC-2007-2316 & PC-2007-2317

Government Organized Crime
Corruption and Conspiracy
Greedy and the Needy

The needy can not give up and the greedy will not
Morality is a luxury the needy cannot afford and the greedy who have a choice do not comprehend it
Where does poverty come from?
There comes a time for all good people to realize that they are not
There are 7 billion people in the world born randomly placed to earth with innocent and empty mind
to environments ranging from extreme poverty to extreme wealth, provided with magnificent brains to
think with and bodies to do their bidding, all requiring the same necessities of life, capable of the same
emotions, susceptible to illness, injury and kindness.
Not one person had the option as to be born, who ones parents are, how they will look, what language they
will speak, how long they will live, what they will be taught to believe, what country they will be reared in,
what customs will become habit, and what ideologies will be forced on them.
When people are treated like dogs they can do nothing but run in circles trying to catch their tail and with
the grace of God the whole body moves simultaneously for if their tails suddenly stopped their heads
would be firmly embedded in their ass.
The Ideal is just Reality sanely dealt with

Nobody knows humans like humans do and reality is that which we perceive it to be which means there are
7 billion unique perceptions of reality all of which affect the one reality, which we all exist.
It is the responsibility of society as a whole if we are ever to exist in peace and advance into the unknown
the constant new frontier where there are no bounds.
43
That is where electricity and computers were found, automobiles, aeroplanes, space ships, the secrets to
longevity and unfortunately nuclear bombs where more longevity secrets await.
The nuclear bomb was a perception of necessity that developed from our ineptness to sane moral thought
and reason and our persistence to habits and traditions with the mind having a mind of its own inherent to
the nature of humankind.
One has to ponder the wisdom of clinging to the past while struggling and promoting the future that awaits
us whereas if we were to release our hold on ancient time’s all at once we would be propelled to where we
need and want to be.
That place is the Ideal for every one of unique perceptions, a constant progressive variable where
unfortunately today to some could be a loaf of bread.
As we venture into the uncertainty of our present future I can say for certain it is not as promising as would
have been if not for the brilliance of the greedy attentive to personal favour that just happens to be the
nature of humankind.
Who does not want to advance their quality of life and just what is advancement to the 7 billion unique
perceptions?
Money is the catalyst where they who are in abundance have it covered as well as can be done but
unfortunately with advancement all the money in the world can not stop the advancement of time as the
clock starts ticking for us all at birth until it unwinds and finally stops, when reality ceases to exist, an
inevitable consequence of advancement.
Can we afford to advance so slowly into the future where longevity exists and why prolong our stay in
chaotic abyss of eons of wars, destruction, poverty, starvation and unnecessary illness due our persistence
to maintain the status quo?
What is the status quo?
Poverty is not a desired place to be born to, never asked for and not an easy place to escape, but is a
pathetic state of reality.
Nobody goes looking for it, nothing to strive for and every individual has a natural force within him or her
to distance him or her selves from it as quickly as possible.
.
Unless you have been there you can not possibly understand it
Hell, from what I have observed with 7 billion perceptions befuddling the reality we all must exist I doubt
anyone understands anything below the surface of immediate and obvious observation.
Confucius 551 BC – 479 BC born to poverty understood it as he rose to dine with kings, but left the
hierarchy, obviously of sane moral mind adept to sane moral thought and reason who identified the most
serious problem that aggravated world peace and harmony among all people.
“There were no dates in this history, but scrawled this way and that across every page were the words
BENEVOLENCE, RIGHTEOUSNESS and MORALITY…finally I began to make out what was written
between the lines; the entire volume was filled with a single phrase: EAT PEOPLE”
44
Obviously we can not have a peaceful world with the authorities eating people and it is possible to stop, as
I understand the Pygmy tribes have managed to break the habit.
Confucius went on to provide us the only viable means to live in peace and work together which is
pathetically obvious yet not observed by the authorities today 2500 years since he gave us the Golden
Rule.
“Do not impose on others what you would not have done to you”
So obviously true to purpose, simple to comprehend by humans of sane moral thought and reason adept to
sane moral thought and reason with fortitude and conviction to sane moral thought and reason.
Everyone of sane moral thought knows damn well the necessity of adhering to the Golden Rule even the
amoral who do their dastardly deeds under the cover of darkness even if it is in the light of day.
Reality attests that there is fungus among us and if the Golden Rule is to work we must all abide by it or
we that do are at a humongous disadvantage.
Confucius knew back then how to deal with the problem simply stating the obvious.
“Recompense injury with justice and recompense kindness with kindness”
It does not matter who it is if the concept is to work, being humongously fair to all as in Democracy and
the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms and any person guilty of non compliance must be punished
being the only viable means known of present time with due regard to deterrence and due diligence to the
predictable attentive to prevention.
To ensure the concept is reality and ultimately the ideal there must be strict consistent enforcement by
competent responsible irreproachable personnel with fortitude and conviction to the realization of the spirit
of every individual and society as a whole to be in, of and with the spirit of the Golden Rule consistent
with the Constitution being “The Spirit of the Law” that is conducive to every individual’s guaranteed
Charter rights of equal protection and benefits.
Reality is a tell all irrefutably proving the authorities have been granted power under the auspices of the
Constitution to make the concept real, however reality also reveals the authorities are unscrupulous of
nefarious bent as per tradition that extends well past 2500 years as Confucius informed us.
Jesus paraphrased with “Do unto others as you would have them do unto you”
So they killed him providing a good understanding as to the unscrupulous nature of the authorities.
Consistent with the reality is poverty, war and civil unrest, all direct results of ignorance and selfish
purpose inherent to humankind combined with the fact we are creatures of habit.
45
A little learning is a dangerous thing;
Drink deep and taste not the Pierian spring;
There shallow draughts intoxicate the brain;
And drinking largely sobers us again.
Alexander Pope 1688 -1744
Ignorance our Albatross
The human brain is a most magnificent thing capable of extraordinary good and evil which is every
individual’s responsibility to control the evil to a point where it becomes habit where it is virtually
impossible when reality is permitted to exasperate the situation and in particular I make reference to the
illegitimate legal system whose personnel administer and enforce it precisely adverse to the Constitution
not consistent with Democracy or conducive to every individual’s guaranteed Charter rights with they who
consider themselves doing well under the circumstance seeing no reason to rock the boat not giving a
damn about the ramifications upon they of lesser means
They are intoxicated with their comparatively better off than thou syndrome with the idiotic belief they
worked hard to get to where they are and the poor are just lazy bastards, dope addicts, and criminally
inclined who do not deserve their help.
They are wrong and simply fooling themselves allowing the conspirators to even take advantage of them.in
so many ways they do not even bother to think about.
1) They are cooperating with the conspirators creating the reality that is adverse to the Ideal which is fair to
everyone and yet they will mutter unfair this and unfair that while poverty persists decidedly unfair
2) A person born to poverty has humongous challenges the majority are not aware of and most often even
the poor are not aware, being mentally challenged from the get go due the unfortunate circumstances.
a) Quite often their parents are mentally challenged or mentally abused from the realities inherent to
poverty passed on through generation after generation.
b) We could look at the aboriginals who were free and lived off the land until the white man came
stealing what was theirs along with their way of life forcing them to live their way which is mental
anguish to say the least, and without parents to bring them up to speed in the white mans ways
where the desire is just not there, exasperates the situation.
c) The blacks have had even more of a struggle, with everything of value stolen from them, including
themselves sold into slavery and displaced from their land and families.
d) Of course there would be many who would grow up with a less than amiable attitude towards the
white man
3) It was the authorities that allowed this and the wealthy that could afford it and as always society allowed
it, with seemingly nothing the populous could do about it any more than they can seemingly do today
given the nature of people and their priority of concerns to themselves not alert to the fact that all realities
invariably affect their quality of life.
46
For instance slave labour puts others out of work and the slave owners who were obviously already not too
bad off became a whole lot richer with the slaves doing a whole lot more work for them at little overhead.
This allows them to expand their operations buying more slaves to run them creating an industry with
many more blacks brought to a country against their will to be slaves.
a) They were demeaned, looked down upon by they who were fortunate not to be treated the same
and of course many refused to accept and attempted to escape and then considered ornery and
sometimes dangerous doing what any sane person would do if they had the guts.
b) Treated like dogs and even after they were freed they still were treated less than human as even
kids belittled them simply being raised that way to look down on them.
c) Who can imagine the rage, frustration, hopelessness and despair that were contained within them?
d) The majority eventually accepted it over the years being just “How it is” with newborns having
not experienced the realities of they who were first enslaved knowing no different than how they
are raised and came accustomed to.
e) I suspect they actually grew up believing they were inferior.
3) A whole lot like it is with the white man who is born to poverty in hopelessness and despair who many
take solace in believing at least they are superior to the black man and any others races who find their way
to Canada in search of a better life.
a) It is only common sense to do so, which any sane person of moral thought and reason would opine
but morality is not a luxury the impoverished can afford.
b) It is all absurd, a product created by society led by the authorities and acquiesced over time where
the only way out of this maze for many is to quick money and the respect associated with it
causing many to join gangs and venture into a life of crime.
c) It is a known fact people have to eat, have a sense of belonging and hope for the future and
invariably many will go for it and others sit on their ass waiting for whatever comes along.
d) Many see the welfare system as the way to go, providing them a nice apartment, or townhouse
with many who work at low wages paying what ever the system reasons they can afford to
contribute.
e) They have many things covered such as dental care where many are far better off than they would
be if they earned more than that which allows them to enter the system and if they do earn more
they must report it and of course their rent goes up.
f) They certainly do not want to earn more than allows them to stay in the system or they will find
themselves in a lesser quality accommodation having to pay all the extras and dental care the
harder steady worker has to pay.
g) Many young girls learn from their lifer parents and choose to get pregnant to live that better life
style as they perceive it to be and the problem is simply endemic and systemic.
4) Charities flourish under these conditions and other bottom feeders like Make Poverty History who have
no intention of making that happen as they live a fine respectable lifestyle dealing with the symptoms the
authorities create.
5) Democracy Watch has found their way to a decent way of life dealing with the symptoms of a
government legal system that every position of authority is held by members of the law Society of Upper
Canada who stated or implied their members are not required to give a damn about every individual’s
guaranteed Charter rights and evidence is irrelevant to them when against one of their members.
A very significant humongous point is to be made there which causes all the woes of society.
47
They who are supposed to be administering and enforcing the law consistent with the Constitution
conducive to every individual’s guaranteed Charter rights refuse to do so causing all the civil chaos
This results in a humongous amount of taxes paid by they who do not feel concerns them, but it gets worse
and worse as reality attests but they do not have the sense to think it out, believing the system serves them
well keeping them distanced from the soup line.
6) Since many people are forced into poverty through no fault of their own and choose to battle their way
out by getting into criminal activities many people are victimized before they are brought before the courts
and at that time they seek legal aid financed by the taxpayer who they themselves cannot afford to access
the courts due the exorbitant costs of the illegitimate legal system that has been woven of deceit and
prevarication for the express purpose of appearing to be consistent with the Constitution conducive to
every individual’s guaranteed Charter rights intended to eradicate immoral inclination from society but
serves to cause it to flourish being particularly beneficial to the members of the Law Societies who
structured it for their members luxurious benefit refusing to put a modus operandi in place conducive to the
support of every individual’s guaranteed Charter rights of equal protection and benefits thereby feasting
off the symptoms as people are left to the slaughter becoming victims, with many left in the wake of 1
criminal before being brought before the courts to be tried as a first offense.
The people who feel all this doesn’t concern them do not get the point until they become victims and of
course then it is too late as they become like me who for 3 years now have been seeking the justice I am
entitled to with due punishment applied to the appropriate persons who have obstructed me and obviously
obstruct others allowing the criminal element to flourish uncontested until they get into the higher financial
brackets that catch their interests.
7) It is this attitude that causes wars world wide with the persecuted inevitably forced to make a stand
against their governments.
Invariably Capitalist Pigs Democratic Governments…an Oxymoron come to the rescue but unfortunately
they attack our friends, the ones with enough nerve and common sense to realize they are being persecuted
by their governments just like we are which many support because they believe they are doing well under
the system and simply do not care about the persecuted.
They do not realize that they are helping to pay for our armies all over the world causing all the chaos that
the taxpayers finance unknowingly in many cases they are aiding the worlds enemies who simply only care
about money not giving a damn about the people.
Then you get Harris suggesting it has only cost $8 billion for the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan or maybe it
is just one of them but anyway the facts were stated on the media to be more like $14 billion
If money like this was used for constructive instead of destructive purpose poverty could be eliminated
along with all the absurdities that arise because of it.
8) Then there is the people’s tax money like the $40 billion I believe I heard in tax cuts to the oil
companies who just ransacked society for 3 months.
9) Who knows how much the members of the Law Societies ransack us through excessive court costs due
their complicated system designed to deceive the people allowing the government to orchestrate their
favourable outcomes.
48
With this going on world wide how much do you think consumer products are inflated due to exorbitant
waste and corruption?
How much better off would societies be without the members of the Law Societies that begets poverty that
begets the criminal element, welfare, legal aid and armed forces?
How many less persecuted, victims and hopelessness and despair?

How many less police and government personnel would we need to address the symptoms of a government
that will not address reality for legitimate purpose?
Go ahead and list a few yourselves and I would appreciate you forwarding them on to me.
There are a humongous number of sane moral reasons for the government and legal system personnel to be
competent responsible and irreproachable with fortitude and conviction to every individual’s guaranteed
Charter rights of equal protection and benefits.
Unequivocally it is incomprehensible for society to suffer at the hands of the people they choose to
represent them consistent with the Constitution.
There is only one viable method of protecting the people as guaranteed prior to becoming victims and that
is for a consistent all out war on the criminal element with the intent to get to the Kingpins of organized
crime attacking at the roots.
The Charter Democracy Force www.cdf.name has taken the initiative to identify who is at the root of the
woes of the populace of the Province of Ontario and has identified and published the supporting evidence
on the RCMP Final Letter of Disposition web site and the “continued” web site
http://groups.google.com/group/rcmp-final-letter-of-disposition
http://groups.google.com/group/rcmp-final-letter-of-disposition-continued
On the latter site you will find a document to the Ontario Ombudsman, “OmbudsmanOctober312008”
If they are competent responsible and irreproachable with fortitude and conviction consistent with the
Constitution conducive to every individual’s guaranteed Charter rights Charter Democracy will soon
commence.with the restructuring of the legal system to serve the people rather than ransack them.
On September 23 2008 I filed for a Review of the complaint I filed with the Commission for Public
Complaints against the RCMP whose Final Letter of Disposition is published on the
http://groups.google.com/group/rcmp-final-letter-of-disposition being absolutely absurd with every effort
to avoid his or her responsibility to protect every individual as guaranteed.
On October 7 2008 I e-mailed the Reviews section in response to their letter of

September 24 2008 to me stating they have requested the RCMP forward the
pertinent evidence.
I had made note in my September 23 2008 Request for a Review that Staff Sergeant R.B.
MacAdam’s report was of particular importance and that it should be requested and
immediately put in their hands not allowing time for the RCMP to tamper with the evidence.
I mentioned this again on October 7 2008 requesting confirmation as to whether or not they
had received the evidence and requested a copy of said evidence.
49
If the Commission was staffed with competent responsible irreproachable personnel with
fortitude and conviction conducive to every individual’s guaranteed Charter rights adept to
sane moral thought and reason in, of and with “The Spirit of the Law” they would have been
aghast at the evidence and thanked me ever so much for all my efforts to reveal the facts of
the Government Organized Crime.
They would assuredly recognize me as loyal Canadian citizen and show me all the respect I
deserve and at the very least confirm whether or not they received the pertinent evidence
from the RCMP, which they have failed to do.
Considering my demonstrated competence to deal with the issues the said Staff Sergeant
MacAdam report would be most beneficial in my hands, and if for no other reason remove
any doubt his report could have now been falsified.
It has now been near 1 ½ months having not received it, could very well now have have
been defiled.
Reviews
I request again that you acknowledge whether or not you have received the
pertinent evidence from the RCMP and will you send me a copy of Staff Sergeant
R.B.MacAdam’s final report on the complaint I registered with the Commission.
Under separate cover with the RCMP upper echelon having not responded to my
request for them to investigate and file charges against the major player in the
Ontario government organized crime of corruption and conspiracy I will be filing
another complaint against the true RCMP authorities behind the 2 members who I
originally filed against, with them having now irrefutably proving their major roles in
the conspiracy.
Please tend to these issues immediately informing me how you are progressing with
the Review
Thank you,
Frank Gallagher
Manager
This document “ReviewsRCMPComplaintsOctober42008” is published on the

http://groups.google.com/group/rcmp-final-letter-of-disposition-continued
50
October 7 2008
Reviews
Commission for Public Complaints
Against RCMP
reviews@cpc-cpp.gc.ca
www.cdf.name
Re: File Nos. PC-2007-2316 & PC-2007-2317
Government Organized Crime
Corruption and Conspiracy
Dear Reviews
Your letter by Canada Post dated September 24 2008 states you have requested the RCMP to forward you
the pertinent evidence pursuant to my request where urgency is of the essence to ensure there is no time for
the RCMP and other conspirators to manipulate the evidence.
I am most concerned that you should now have secured a copy of RCMP Staff Sergeant R.B. MacAdam’s
report who was assigned by the office of the RCMP Commissioner to investigate my complaint.
The Staff Sergeant spent 8 months studying the evidence and it is germane to the complaint as to his
competence to review the evidence consistent with the Constitution in support of every individual’s
guaranteed Charter rights.
As the evidence on the Charter Democracy Force web sites irrefutably proves the entire government
modus operandi is consistent with that of the Law Society of Upper Canada, which has been documented
and published as the 2 part Law Society of Upper Canada document.
In this document they clearly state or imply their members are not required to give a damn about the
individual’s guaranteed Charter rights nor is evidence relevant to their decisions when it is against their
members.
The “Roles and Responsibilities of the Attorney General” published on the Ontario web site clearly states
he is responsible as the “guardian of the public interest” and the “guardian of the rule of law” to protect
every individual and society as a whole and yet he has been provided the 2 part Law Society of Upper
Canada document along with a preponderance of other evidence which he has refused to deal with
consistent with the Constitution conducive to the support of every individual’s guaranteed Charter rights.
He is the advisor of all Cabinet Ministers, government departments and agencies who have all refused to
deal with these most serious issues and I expect no different from your Reviews office consistent with the
conspiracy.
You have more than just the responsibility to study the evidence published on the webs sites to coherency
to determine if the RCMP have acted appropriately conducive to the protection of every individual as
guaranteed by the Charter as it imperative that you demonstrate due diligence to the support of every
individual’s guaranteed Charter rights particularly since the evidence highly suggests you will not be
cooperative with me as it is impossible to do so and remain consistent with the conspiracy.
51
Once again the evidence published on the Charter Democracy Force web site irrefutably proves the
conspiracy and all government personnel who have responded to the evidence have had precisely the same
evidence to review and their responses or no responses is self – evident they are not competent responsible
and irreproachable with fortitude and conviction to the Constitution conducive to every individual’s
guaranteed Charter rights, however they have all been consistent with the conspiracy conducive to its
success.
The evidence clearly shows due diligence to the conspiracy clearly orchestrated from the office of the
Minister of Justice and Attorney General of Canada and the office of the Ontario Attorney General
regarding the issues I have presented relative to incidents that occurred in Ontario.
The RCMP Superintendent’s Final Letter of Disposition dated September 3 2008, less than 2 pages of
context is incomprehensible clearly demonstrating that he is not competent responsible and irreproachable
with fortitude and conviction consistent with the Constitution conducive to every individual’s guaranteed
Charter rights however it irrefutably proves he is consistent with the conspiracy.
On the other hand the evidence published on the Charter Democracy Force web site attests that I have been
competent responsible irreproachable with fortitude and conviction consistent with the Constitution
conducive to every individual’s guaranteed Charter rights where we comprehend the significance of
evidence and the necessity of its acquisition to support allegations and have applied every effort to
obtaining pertinent evidence to ensure the truth, the whole truth is being provided for all to see and act
appropriately.
To maintain our consistency to the Constitution conducive to every individual’s guaranteed Charter rights
and our attentiveness to competent responsible and irreproachable approach with fortitude and conviction
we request confirmation you are now in receipt of the pertinent evidence requested from the RCMP with
relative information confirming the date that you received it.
Consistent with democracy and equality guaranteed by the Charter I request a copy of the evidence
acquired from the RCMP relative to my complaint where I am particularly interested in the contents of
RCMP Staff Sergeant R.B. MacAdam’s report after 8 months of studying the pertinent evidence.
It is imperative that we know whether or not his perception of what he was to accomplish is consistent with
the Constitution conducive to every individual’s guaranteed Charter rights or not.
If you do not comprehend this then your perception is not adept to these most serious issues.
I remind you that laws, policies, procedures and normal routines set out by the conspirators are of no force
or effect as to their inconsistencies with the Constitution
I request you consider wisely before you make a decision not to cooperate with me consistent with the
Constitution conducive to every individual’s guaranteed Charter rights.
52
I request immediate acknowledgement of receipt of this document
“RequestReviewsProvideEvidenceOctober72008” published on the RCMP Final Letter of Disposition”
web site under heading “Reviews Correspondence”
I also request immediate confirmation as to whether or not you are in now in possession of the evidence
requested from the RCMP and whether or not you intend to immediately forward the requested evidence to
me.
Thank you
Frank Gallagher
Manager
PS
It is imperative you and everyone understands the present financial crisis cannot be dealt with
appropriately by the conspirators that caused it who will invariably be attentive to the preservation of their
own asses and their own financial well being, as always humongously detrimental to the safety and
wellbeing of the individual and society as a whole.
They must be exposed and appropriate action taken to ensure competent responsible people with fortitude
and conviction to the Constitution and our Charter rights are provided the authority to lead us out of the
financial crisis hugely detrimental to world peace and the well being of the world populace.
53
Public Inquiry warranted and demanded
Only the conspirators will object and thereby thrust themselves upon
their own swords
This was well worth the wait, but unfortunately society has paid far too
much for the pleasure and cannot afford to wait any longer.
September 26 2008 Expediency is of the essence
www.cdf.name PUBLIC INQUIRY NOW!!!!

The unscrupulous Government members of the Law Societies and their unscrupulous counterpart’s world wide are responsible for
present reality as certain as always as history attests where:
Their insatiable quest for wealth and power in cooperation with the affluent and influential and multinational corporate conglomerates
have manipulated the markets indifferent to the safety and wellbeing of the people of the Lower Tiers and now when their
manipulations are back firing on them, they who have been ransacking us to poverty reveal they have always had the money to deal
with poverty and prove their indifference to poverty by now pulling out the money to save their asses. They are only coherent to
poverty when it nears them and justice will be learned the hard way.
Can we trust the people who have been irrefutably proven to be unscrupulous back stabbing cancers upon society to act responsibility
all of a sudden for Society or will they use their BENEVOLENCE, RIGHTEOUSNESS and MORALITY ploy to keep their
unscrupulous Law Societies luxuriously secure and us in poverty to the bitter end?
Quite a responsibility for the Chair of their Commission. Such a serious issue belongs to the democratic moral majority
54
Resistance to sanity is MAD When minds are lost best lose
Resistance to MAD is sad yours before going MAD
If it makes you mad it probably is

Enforcing the Law A novel idea
Common Sense Evolution

Red Coats Mad Plan 2008
The Law is a book to go by...not a book to go buy Charter rights are not for sale or rent
Yet the members of the Society sell and rent them over and over again
The members of the Law Society of Upper Canada believe they are the law and are if we believe them
Law Society proclaims their members do not give a dam about the Canadians Charter Rights
The Law Society demonstrate they do not give a damn with every effort to prove it
Ontario Attorney General Michael Bryant demonstrates he doesn’t give a damn

why and the “Roles and Responsibilities of the Attorney General” explains
Politicians debate what’s good for the Society
and the Attorney General assures and enacts it
Lawyer’s debate them on the immoral’s behalf and sure enough their cut behalf
The moral majority finance it but victims don’t have a chance making us all victims perchance it
How MAD are we?
So glad you asked
55
Commissioner of the Royal Canadian Mounted Police
Where’s Zack….. We want Zack
Too bad Zack didn’t realize the government was the organized crime
He might have been here today to help. Right?
Well you are here and realize the government is organized crime. Right?
Of course you do. First hand experience and now you’re a real honest to goodness RCMP
You knew before you received the evidence but what do you do? … is the problem at hand eh? Bill
Do you mind if I call you Bill, Bill………I’ll take that as a yes and you can call me Frank because I
obviously am frank. Eh Bill?
Here you have the conspirators counting on you and you know you can count on them, but what if the people
find out.
Hell, what’s the odds?
Are you sure?
I presume you can count on the Commission for Public Complaints.
Makes this individual want to cry.
You can be who ever you want to be and what you are, so are the Royal Canadian Mounted Police and so
ensures the individual’s lowly place in life in this great country of ours under the supremacy of God who is
just a figment of imagination as is our guaranteed Charter rights.
Why? You know why
56
November 13, 2007
info@cba.org; mail@cba-alberta.org;
edmonton@cba-alberta.org; cba@bccba.org; cba-
mba@mts.net; admin@cbanb.com; cba-
nl@nl.rogers.com; cbanwt@lawsociety.nt.ca;
cbans@ns.sympatico.ca; info@oba.org; cba-
pei@isn.net; info@abcqc.qc.ca;
cba.sk@sasktel.net; cbayukon@internorth.com
Frank Gallagher
34 Riverglen Drive
Keswick,On
L4P 2P8
Dear Canadian Bar Association Representatives
I am just an ordinary citizen of Canada, perhaps a little less passive and a little more conviction towards
the acquisition of justice as I have been on the trail 24/7 since June 30 2005 with it nowhere in site here in
Ontario.
I have looked under every rock and found nothing but snakes, venomous for sure and I was just wondering
if they are spread throughout Canada.
My main concern is to whether or not the Canadian individual is actually guaranteed Charter Rights as
provided in The Constitution Act, 1982 or perhaps they are something you can rent when needed and can
afford them or is there perhaps a way of purchasing them out right or can you only rent them if you have
an excellent credit rating.
57
If a crook cleans you out is your acquisition to justice negated for being so stupid or is it the governments
fault for not getting the message to me that there are bad people running around the country?
Well let me get to the point
I have accomplished nothing in the line of justice here in Ontario and in fact the evidence I have collected
along the way proves irrefutably it is impossible to achieve the justice as stated and implied in the
Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms for quite obvious reason which the Law Society of Upper
Canada related to me in a completely different matter than the one I an providing you today.
They are quite adamant their members do not give a damn about the individual’s guaranteed Charter
Rights which makes it quite difficult for me to discern how it would be possible for the individual to
achieve justice consistent with the supreme law of Canada, with their members having infested the legal
system.
I am requesting you review the attachments and study the referenced evidence responding FFF.
Should you find anything that seems not particularly right in your understanding of The Law take
appropriate action to address the issues.
You will read that I do not have confidence in the government personnel due their indifference to the
issues I have addressed them where my analysis of the evidence proves irrefutably government personnel
are engaged in a conspiracy against the Canadian people whereby the individual who is guaranteed Charter
rights hasn’t a hope in hell accessing them alone and hasn’t a hope in hell organizing the people to stand
together to assert their rights.
Of course if I was gay I would have a membership to contend with.
In any case I would like you to review the actions taken by the Law Society of Upper Canada against the
particular lawyer referenced within the said file and take action where it is due in your professional
opinions.
I am sending this to Canadian Bar Association Representatives across the country and I presume the
significance of the serious nature of the issues will be readily apparent to you.
I would appreciate very much if you each addressed the issues in an independent manner and studied the
evidence as if you each were the individual looking for justice.
In other words put yourself in my shoes using your intelligent heads to determine if you would be getting a
fair shake under the law and if not set out a course of action as to how you would address it.
I do not expect you to respond to me nor do I expect you to act on my behalf.
I was hoping perchance once you have all completed addressing your analysis of the evidence and
identified the or any inadequacies as per your individual departments perception of The Law, the
Constitution, you would accumulate them to one department and distribute the whole 15 to each
department simultaneously for analysis for the purpose of restructuring a Legal System conducive to and
consistent with the individual’s guaranteed Charter rights, which believe it or not is a significant concern to
them even if they are not aware.
58
Surely there can be no doubt it is time for significant change to the Legal System and perhaps it will be
more apparent if you should take on this endeavor independently and then together as suggested or in some
manner more suitable to your intelligence obviously having a broader oversight than I could possibly have
although I do have a particular view perchance you have not yet chanced upon and I highly suspect no
more desire to do than I.
However having done so why not take advantage of putting your minds together to compare apples against
apples or oranges against oranges as you prefer.
Just a thought as they persistently pop up without a thought as to what to do with them.
I would appreciate it if someone would forward this information on to Mr. Gary H. Pon up there in
Nunavut because it just has become too costly to fax for me.
It has also occurred to me he may be lonely up there and glad to here from us in the south.
Perhaps he may suggest if we just all went ice fishing we would all keep out of trouble.
Thank you
Frank Gallagher
Frank Gallagher
PS
I would appreciate however knowing if you see the necessity to address the issues in some manner.
59
November 13, 2007
Frank Gallagher
34 Riverglen Drive
Keswick, On
L4P 2P8
Canada
Constitution Act, 1982

Part 1, Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms
Canada is founded upon the supremacy of God and the rule of law
Guarantee of Rights and Freedoms
1. The Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms guarantees the rights and freedoms set
out in it subject only to such reasonable limits prescribed by law as can be demonstrably
justified in a free and democratic society.
2. Everyone has the following fundamental freedoms: (a) freedom of conscience

and religion; (b) freedom of thought, belief, opinion and expression, including
freedom of the press and other media of communication; (c) freedom of
peaceful assembly; and (d) freedom of association.
Guardians of the Canadians Charter of Rights and Freedoms

http://groups.google.com/group/guardians-of-the-canadians-charter-of-rights-and-freedoms
The Conspiracy
Office of the Minister of Justice and Attorney General of Canada
Office of the Attorney General of Ontario
http://groups.google.com/group/peoples-law-society
Law Society of Lower Tier Canada
PUBLIC INQUIRY
On September 1 2006 the preliminary findings of an investigation undertaken by myself, a former
Provincial Government and City of Toronto employee, suggesting a provincial government
conspiracy against the people of Ontario were presented to the Premier of Ontario Dalton McGuinty
and several other top government officials including Peter Van Loan of the Federal Government to
provide them the opportunity to commence or cause to commence proceedings to expose the
government personnel involved so as to bring them before the justice system of Canada where the
evidence identified as the BLACK BOOK clearly showed there were serious inconsistencies of the
Ontario laws with the Constitution Act, 1982 the supreme law of Canada. Allegations of obstruction
of justice under the Tenant Protection Act, 1997 and the criminal code of the Constitution Act, 1982 60
When the Premier and others failed to respond to the BLACK BOOK given the apparent serious nature
of the issues I began to circulate the evidence to various government departments and levels of
government and upon receiving no positive response began to realize the whole legal system was corrupt
and in on a conspiracy against the people which presented some what of an impediment to my original
quest to have a fraud brought to justice, which expanded to include obstruction of justice by certain
government personnel and then to government conspiracy against the people.
In the early stages of my investigation I was running on plain old common sense and a whole lot of
experience in investigative practice having retired from a forty year career in land surveying having
spent 10 years with the province of Ontario, 16 years in the private sector where I was managing a small
survey office before wrapping up my 40 year career with 14 years at the City of Toronto.
Obviously the challenge was insurmountable to take on the whole damn government, one person against
Goliath without slingshot nor any faith in God.
What I did have was faith in me being particularly adept to the challenge, unorthodox in my ways
having always looked for better and faster ways than the conventional which had been well established
long before my presence on the scene.
So having recently retired having availability of time, confidence in my experience with fortitude and
conviction, confidence in the incompetence of government personnel and their persistence to resist
change and their general attitude of killing a day in their quest to retirement, their general ineptitude to
learn any more than what they have been told and adherence to routine and their general confidence in a
thing dependent on sticking together to a belief of ignorant persuasion unfounded of common sense and
having often taken on such challenges before to change the ideology of well established principles this
was an opportunity and challenge of a lifetime I had lucked upon. Attitude towards purpose is
everything.
As in any challenge it serves well to know your opponent and in this case they didn’t know me and in
fact they are so bloody ignorant they don’t even know themselves.
Their persistence to ignorance and continuity to incompetence enforced by habit and routine and their
confidence dependent on the support of others akin leave them extraordinarily vulnerable devoid of
common sense intent to original purpose of hire and that which is intended and necessary to accomplish.
I have taken on such challenges successfully many times before in single offices and departments before
but the whole damn government?
Ha ha ha, this indeed was going to be a decent challenge with no likely help in sight.
As I set myself to the task gathering and studying what ever I could get my hands on pertinent to the
endeavor being abundantly aware of the value of documentation and it’s authority upon circumstance
and the significance of priority of legitimate evidence and the difference between what is relative
evidence to the purpose and what is evidence as to what has been done whereas a continuity of evidence
coincidental to an erroneous presumption makes the whole string of evidence irrelative to the purpose
required to be achieved even though the evidence is abundantly weighted given an apparent advantage to
the erroneous conclusion over limited evidence of legitimate support credence must be given in support
of that which was originally intended even to the extent of taking many steps back before continuance of
the original legitimate course to purpose.
Once achieved with significance to fact, due consideration must be to the resolve from the point of
deception and resulting detriments in efficient effective manner consistent with and conducive to
original purpose with due regard to continuity of sanity.
Tradition is a preponderance of consistencies perhaps supported by a proliferation of truths but when

continuity of tradition is extrapolated inconsistent to sane and legitimate purpose it is null and void from
. 61
the point of diversion and all once considered truths from said point of deviation remain
evident true to the deviation however of no value relative to the integrity of legitimate purpose.
That is to state for all intent and purpose they are mythical and habitual in nature inane to
purpose.
As is the nature of habit and the government personnel’s persistence to it being the basis their
intelligence is traditionally founded on they can be depended on to be consistent with each other
as assuredly as their confident is dependent on support from each other but break one link in
that chain and that which the chain supports collapses.
Within each department are a few competent people of unique perception amongst many
followers who are devoid of consistent sane reason persistently reasoning aloud aggravating
clear and precise path to intended purpose which assuredly must be reasoned but left to those
capable.
These inane people who learn by rote inundated with truths of superfluity gathered on diversion
obscure and befuddle the clear path providing obstacles to one, intent on taking it, where
tendency is to take the path of least resistance creating a long arduous journey of apparent
insanity to purpose but the only sane way to get there due the insanity.
Upon reaching the intended destination due regard must be given to straightening the course
from the point of commencement having proof of success in hand removing one by one the
obstructions that originally stood in path elongating the original trek to exorbitant financial and
time loss.
Failure to remove, these obstructions will persist to obstruct again and again to the humongous
detriment to successful achievement of effective efficient legitimate sane purpose they are inept
and detrimental to.
Digressions are the catalysts to eradicate the superfluities of diversions where associated truths
are relative to the diversions only as authentic as the diversion itself relative to the true bearing
from beginning to end of legitimate sane purpose where a traverse of trial and error was
originally traveled from beginning as a means to the success.
A straight line from beginning to end can then be drawn and any point along the diversion can
be computed as to its offset from the truth though indeed all and any evidence of the diversion
remains steadfast as truth of the diversion alone, not the truth of the true line of legitimate
purpose.
These truths of the diversion serve a purpose of their own consistent with the diversion whereas
it may be beneficial to the true purpose to determine why the diversion was so far off course
and who was responsible and why for the purpose of deterrence of reoccurrence of the
superfluity.
With some incite as to where I am coming from and definite knowledge of intent to expose the
government conspiracy I have staged a mocked Public Trial where the evidence is real and the
public is not being all there is the “threshold” so to speak between the Reality and the Fiction.
Quite an accomplishment for just one individual but I have to admit I couldn’t have done it
without the cooperation of the government personnel who persistently remained true as to that
which I knew to be true about them. How true their incompetence and consistence to it. Eh?
62
Public Trial
Fiction or Reality?
The Fiction of the Attorney General

Fiction or Reality?
Belief
Yes, it is all in the belief

Nothing to do with what I believe for the evidence is real
What’s it matter what I believe now that I accomplished my belief?
I have proved it irrefutably to no one but me because no one has seen it, though available on the web for
the public to see no one has seen it I believe
Do you see what I mean? Oh, then you must have seen it.
So you are either no one or just no one of useful purpose to me or the issues I addressed. Right?
Given the evidence is real, you are real, I am real and it’s all on my web in the public domain which is real
and you have all been provided the evidence and televisions and radios are real, the Toronto Sun and Star
being real and yet I have heard nothing about the issues which are real being addressed I realistically find
you all guilty as I had set out to prove .
All that remains is the hanging, so to speak.
I have heard it said.

Give them enough rope and they will hang themselves.
Mission accomplished I believe.

Well that was good for me, was it good for you?
The thing with fiction and reality is they are both real with fiction being a deviation of reality.
Now we just draw a straight line from 1982 to 2007 with the individual’ guaranteed Charter Rights the
purpose.
My individual guaranteed Charter rights were seriously violated on June 30 2005 at an Ontario Rental
Housing Tribunal by my former tenant in front of the judicator Nancy Fahlgren being well aware , in a
public building financed by the people of Ontario to administer justice to and for the people where justice
has not yet been served on this Wednesday the 14th day of November 2007 which you all are aware and in
fact have been found guilty as per which the evidence irrefutably proves by your refusal to commence or
cause to commence proceedings consistent with and conducive to the individual’s guaranteed Charter
rights
You being the prominent government personnel whose e-mail addresses are listed on page 37 of the
document dated November 12 2007 “Mad Glad mostly Sad WHY?.doc” to be found on my web site
63
Court of Appeal
With due consideration to your rights to appeal even though you have not contested the findings of the
Public Trial which the evidence irrefutably proved and by your continued persistence not to deal with the
issues which are of a most serious nature regarding your willful refusal to demonstrate a modus operandi is
in place consistent with and conducive to the individual’s guaranteed Charter Rights and having been
provided the irrefutable evidence my Charter rights have been violated and remain steadfast not to
administer and enforce justice in respect of my Charter rights I have taken the responsibility to assure you
all will receive the justice you are entitled to under the Constitution Act, 1982 with due consideration to
your guaranteed individual Charter rights.
Having said that and after a preliminary investigation into the Federal Governments ability to perform their
duties consistent with and conducive to your individual guaranteed Charter rights I have initiated
proceedings in the form of a Public Inquiry to clear the way and safe guard your rights to a fair trial before
the Federal courts
The following is my initiatives to this endeavor.
On my web site Law Society of Lower Tier Canada http://groups.google.com/group/peoples-law-society

towards the bottom of the page you will see the following link to a document which is a cover document
addressed to the RCMP which I took to the Newmarket detachment accompanied by my mother on
October 18 2007 along with the documents listed on page 9 therein which Sgt. Steinebech declined to take
possession of
Request RCMP investigation of Government Conspiracy.doc (3)
Immediately below that are links to the evidence listed on page 9 aforesaid and below that is a link to
RCMP Meeting Recap October 18 2007.doc which is a recap of that said meeting with Sgt.
Steinebach RCMP
From there if you would care to join me on my web site Guardians of the Canadian Charter of Rights and
Freedoms http://groups.google.com/group/guardians-of-the-canadians-charter-of-rights-and-freedoms near
the top of the page you will see a link to my letter to Stockwell Day Minister of Public Safety dated
November 3 2007 which makes reference to previous efforts to get Federal Government personnel to
address the issues regarding the individual’s guaranteed Charter Rights.
Below that are links to other documents demonstrating my efforts to the endeavor and to this date
November 14 2007 I have not received any indication they are responsive to my concerns leaving the
individual’s guaranteed Charter Rights unprotected by the Federal Government the issuers of the
guarantee, which implicates them to the conspiracy and most certainly are responsible to back the
guarantee as is fundamental to common law having accepted financial benefit to provide a service
consistent with and conducive to the guarantee as per the provisions of the Charter to each individual.
With all the evidence in and having been provided the opportunity to respond to the evidence and failing to
do so and furthermore having not commenced or caused to commence proceedings consistent with and
conducive to the individual’s guaranteed Charter rights they too of the Federal Government referred within
the documents referred to herein are guilty of conspiracy against the Canadian people.
It may be Fiction to you people until the Public Read it when it will become real.
The Commission for Public Complaints Against the Royal Canadian Mounted Police have advised in
accordance with the RCMP Act, my complaint was forwarded to the Commissioner for appropriate action.
What do you suppose that means? 64
Toronto Star and Toronto Sun
I’m sure you know better than I how all this will work out.
Will I live long enough to see a real investigation?
How long should an investigation take when it is already done?
You have the evidence.
You people could jump in anytime or do you expect it to be covered up and you’re just doing your part?
Perhaps you don’t give a damn about the people.

The evidence appears that way wouldn’t you think?
You people operate under your rights guaranteed under the Charter and I am sure you have had some
interesting challenges.
How convenient that you just happened to have the media to support your cause.
It works because the people support you.
65
Why wouldn’t you support the people?
Just one of those things in reality Eh
Me, me, me.
Aren’t you guys first to claim the public have the right to know what’s going on?
Oh, I see. They have no rights unless you decide to support them.
It’s supposed to work two ways I am sure you know.

Just forgot for a moment. Eh?
There is a huge story here of Historic Epic unless of course you like things fine how they are with the
people taking the shaft.
We’ll soon know
Why not interview some of the people. Start with Lawyer Files # 1-3. Find out where Attorney General
Michael Bryant first came into the picture. At the beginning, Right? You know it all
Does the Commission do what they advertise to do?
Not bloody likely.
No government department or agency is going to be provided the authority to expose and eliminate the
government conspirators for obvious reason they are the ones who hand out the authority. Right?
Well pretty soon I will have exposed the whole damn system from every direction.
Oh, I get it. Since I was doing so well gathering the irrefutable evidence in natural course of pursuance of
justice they would expose themselves rather than cover things up as they would when reporters come
snooping around.
Brilliant, I do all the work, and when you are ready to cash in when circulation slows presto, you’re in
business again.
Perhaps for Christmas you will give the people what they have long been waiting for.
Nail the government conspirators to the cross.
When they cite their traditional values and- the rule of law-which has long been the well established
legal principle of that elusive concept, hard to easily define which protects the individual and society as a
whole which the Attorney General is responsible to guard as his Office has traditionally done you will be
prepared to stomp on them.
Good plan. Don’t forget to give them enough rope and make sure they all get a chance to speak to that
proving that is indeed their present day ideology and mode of operandi.
Then perhaps cite the words of Confucius to support their traditionalism stretching far back at least 2500
years ago.
66
“There were no dates in this history but scrawled this way and that across every page were the words
Benevolence, Righteousness and Morality….finally I began to make out what was written between the
lines; the whole volume was filled with a single phrase: EAT PEOPLE”
Then present the letter from the York Regional Police Deputy Chief Bruce Herridge dated January 10 2006
where he makes reference to issues being connected to the legislative framework which has long been
established in this country. (See page 18)
Once they have all proved their consistency to helping the Attorney General guard –the rule of law- that
most elusive concept, hard to easily define, that well established legal principle which the Office of the
Attorney General has traditionally guarded to incompetently protect the individual and society as a whole
proving all the government personnel are consistent and persistent to the endeavor proving irrefutably the
established modus operandi of the government today is consistent with the tradition and the Attorney
General who has guarded it well you can table the Constitution Act, 1982 (document) which contains the
guarantee to each individual and society as a whole which demands competent responsible government
personnel irreproachable to the support of the guarantee.
Then when they do their Jackie Gleason “humma humma humma” we’ll laugh and laugh and laugh
savoring every moment before we nail them to the cross.
Ha ha ha, I get it, Brilliant Toronto Star and Toronto Sun as the darkness of night representative by the Star
slips into the bright sunny day representative by the Sun.
Sure it’s all documented but they are creatures of habit and will continue to argue as they are wont to do
and perhaps entitled to do before 1982 but once the Constitution was enacted in 1982 their traditional ways
were precluded as were all laws and precedence set which were inconsistent with the spirit of the Law
under the supremacy of God where as to their inconsistencies were of no force or effect.
The ramifications are extraordinarily stupefying where the whole damn government personnel of mandated
authority have caused incalculable deprivations upon the Canadian individual’s and has allowed to persist
due the unusual coincidence of circumstance where the ineptness of the people naïve to The Law being
attentive to private sector endeavors and their undying trust and faith in the legal system that the personnel
will watch each other consistent with The Law while the mandated authorities of the establishment took
advantage of their faithful trust as they carried on business as usual as they have traditionally, defined in
the words of Confucius so long ago.
Quite a formidable length of time indicative of the depth of experience to the traditional endeavors to
“EAT PEOPLE” as they ransacked, used and consumed them to sate their avarice habits.
“Men’s natures are alike; it’s their habits that carry them far apart”
They have had 25 years to break their old habits while the people and society suffered as they do from all
of immoral persuasion, whereas the evidence shows their resistant to change having been caught cold
turkey must be stopped cold turkey and I have charged the Commissioner of the RCMP with that
responsibility.
Commissioner William Elliot alias “Bill” is just the man to do it being experienced in their traditional
habits of slippery ways appearing headed east towards the rise of a new day but bent west intent of
continuous darkness of their traditional good old days.
Mister Bill has chanced upon a most difficult challenge with no precedence to guide him and the dire
necessity unprecedented where cold turkey he must about face or end up on our hot plates Christmas Day.
67
Somewhat of a befuddlement but the people are fed up with paying the bills, the Michaels, Armands and
Bruces and the Randys of The Law enforcerment who are incompetent due their incoherence to it as they
have been caught up and addicted to the habitual ways of their predecessors as did they before them on and
on in descent of chain of ancestry being in dissent of present law namely the Constitution Act, 1982 which
is the supreme law of Canada which recognizes the principle of the supremacy of God affirmed in the
verbiage and particularly defined as
1. The Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms guarantees the rights and freedoms set out in it subject
only to such reasonable limits prescribed by law as can be demonstrably justified in a free and democratic
society.
2. Everyone has the following fundamental freedoms: (a) freedom of conscience and
religion; (b) freedom of thought, belief, opinion and expression, including freedom of
the press and other media of communication; (c) freedom of peaceful assembly; and
(d) freedom of association.
7. Everyone has the right to life, liberty and security of the person and the right not to be deprived thereof
except in accordance with the principles of fundamental justice.
12. Everyone has the right not to be subjected to any cruel and unusual treatment or punishment.
15. (1) Every individual is equal before and under the law and has the right to the equal protection and
equal benefit of the law without discrimination and, in particular, without discrimination based on race,
national or ethnic origin, colour, religion, sex, age or mental or physical disability.
Attentiveness to The Law is mandatory to all Canadians but none should be more informed than the
government personnel financed to administer and enforce it whereas they must be competent, responsible
and irreproachable to it so as to support the guarantee of the Charter in a manner consistent with and
conducive to it as per any guarantee of common law and tradition with due regard to common sense and
the sanity attributed to it.
It is the presumption that the Constitution (Document) and the Constitution (Establishment) are one and
the same but it is the presumption they must be the same that provides the direction to where a conclusion
lies but presumed evidence of the presumption remains a state of mind until valid evidence is presented in
it’s support and every rock turned to assure no rebut exists to challenge.
Obvious neglect to precise coherence of The Law in administering and enforcing provides clear and
present danger to the individual’s guaranteed Charter rights where an inconsistency in administering or
enforcing The Law is an immediate deprivation to the individual’s Charter rights not only directly of the
victim of particular circumstance but every individual who finances the system as a taxpayer and indirectly
every person dependent on them for their personal well being.
Where an inconsistency with The Law is identified it is incumbent upon the government personnel
mandated to administer and enforce it to immediately address the inconsistency to eradicate any possibility
of reoccurrence and when it is found that it is a human deliberation for personal benefit due regard to
deterrence must be applied with deliberate due regard.
For the purpose of due regard to the necessity of coherence all verbiage of law must be presumed to have
been written in the spirit of God who is supreme in matters of the supreme law of Canada and consistent
due regard must adhere to its interpretation.
Credence must be given to that which can be least mistaken by humankind whereas the following words of
Jesus who was closest to God and knew well of his aspirations was heard and well known to say.
68
As common sense attests and commonly known, no law will be consistently obeyed unless consistently
enforced and where adherence to justice is demanded of law and consistency to punishment must be
attentive to an eye for an eye with due regard to deliberate intent where priority is to diligence to the
predictable and deterrence to the prevention.
Whereas the present modus operandi of the present authorities has been irrefutably evidenced and proven
incompetent to the endeavor and by the government personnel’s consistence to it having demonstrated
their continuance in persistence having been provided the irrefutable evidence of their unscrupulous
disregard in respect of The Law which they have permitted to run rampant and provided asylum to their
associate accomplices leaves the presumption of their authority unsupported with no rock left unturned
leaving absolutely nothing to be debated finds them without authority leaving them to be duly informed by
a mandated authority who acts within the confines and purpose of The Law.
That responsibly is Mister Bill’s, RCMP Commissioner William Elliot and under the authority of the
Constitution Act, 1982 (Document) which he has been charged, financed and sworn to uphold must do so
consistent with the spirit of The Law in the spirit of God who is supreme as recognized by the supreme law
of Canada, the Constitution Act, 1982 whereas the evidence presented to him is irrefutable to the fact the
Government mandated personnel referenced within the documents presented do not recognize the
principles of The Law namely the supremacy of God and the aspirations attributed to him which have been
clearly written into The Law and excerpts presented on page 15 thereby null and voiding their authority
wherever their inconsistency which the evidence is quite clear they are consistent and persistent to
inconsistency with the Constitution leaving them without authority and vulnerable to any mandated
authority who acts consistent with and conducive to the spirit of The Law and God and it is Bill’s
responsibility to bring them before the courts to face the justice of the people and where any government
personnel mandated under the authority of the Constitution acts in a manner inconsistent with their
obligation to administer and enforce justice pursuant to The Law shall be immediately removed of their
authority and dealt with in consistent manner as the government personnel brought before them.
Quite simple eh Bill? (aside…I know Bill’s watching)
Good, let the festivities begin.
69
70
71
72
73
74
The following e-mail addresses have been sent this document “Commissioner RCMP November
16, 2007” which is available for all to see on my web site “Guardians of the Canadians
Charter of Rights and Freedoms” http://groups.google.com/group/guardians-of-the-canadians-
charter-of-rights-and-freedoms I know Bill Commissioner RCMP William Elliot will study
this document as he reviews all the evidence in competent manner which will lead him to it
As per usual I request you all to study it well as if your way of life is dependent on it as each
individual’s way of life guaranteed by the Charter is dependent on your fortitude and conviction to it
FFF. You had best think for yourselves or others will do it for you.
The following e-mail addresses have been sent this document “Commissioner RCMP November 16,
2007 which is available will
75
“A man who has committed a mistake and doesn’t correct it, is committing another mistake”
I believe it is reasonable to presume that this applies to the ladies. Right Ladies?
Consistency of belief guaranties consistency of consequence
What can be said of truth without evidence or willingness to back

He who traditionally argues in defense in support of a tradition after its preclusion by Law, either stated or implied
confirms the tradition and his ineptness to kick the habit attesting to the incompetence of his immediate superior
and ultimately those under his authority.
Being the author I can assert this applies to the ladies equally.
I request you all take responsibility to assure everyone referenced herein has been made aware of the issues and
the importance to their well being so they may take advantage of this final opportunity to address them in a
manner consistent with The Law by which granted them their authority and to collect financial benefit for their
efforts in service of our Country and the Canadian people.
Perchance the RCMP forget to advise you of your rights upon arrest I take this opportunity to advise that you have
the right to remain silent and highly suggest you do so for persistent to traditional habit will betray you and will be
used against you as will the evidence I have documented irrefutably to your part in the conspiracy.
There are no words you can state in your defense that you haven’t already stated or implied by your silence when
immediate action was and is demanded addressing the issues and to restructure the system adept to the protection
and benefit of each individual as guaranteed by the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms.
Under the clear and present circumstance you have only one favorable option beneficial to you and we the other
individual’s referenced in the Charter guarantee.
In the spirit of the season I wish you all a Merry Christmas hoping you experience the true spirit devoid of commercialism
which will take care of itself.
You have been charged and privileged to act in the service of the Lord under the authority of the Constitution which
recognizes His supremacy and by the power vested to you must restructure the legal system adept to your responsibility to
support the guarantee of the Charter consistent with the provisions granted equally to every individual of Canada which is
not an option of debate.
I wish you all a Merry, Merry Christmas and pray you will experience the true spirit of Christmas and retain it in habitual
bliss as you carry out your duties through the years to come in that spirit prerequisite to your power of authority.
In that spirit of accepted habit you will attend to the issues addressed in my writings experiencing the joy privileged with it
as each individual finds God not as a fictional belief but a belief that is real as law and order under His guidance consistent
and conducive to His spirit in the spirit of The Law, the Constitution of Canada prevails.
The web of persistent deceit woven by the members of the Law Society for their members benefit will benefit them no
longer as priority is to the guaranteed individual’s Charter rights which are attached to them as an arm or leg, not to be
debated.
Those government personnel who do not act in good faith of The Law will experience the wrath of The Law and God at their
own expense.
Merry Christmas and goodbye

Frank Gallagher
76
Day.S@parl.gc.ca; MCU@JUSTICE.GC.CA
victimsfirst@ombudsman.gc.ca;Michael.Thomson@rcmp-rc.gc.ca;prevention@ps.gc.ca;randy.craig@jus.gov.on.ca;
communications@ps.gc.ca;McGuinty.D@parl.gc.ca;ahorwath-qp@ndp.on.ca;bakerg@sen.parl.gc.ca; brooksn@scc-csc.gc.ca;bill.murdoch@pc.ola.org;
bob.runciman@pc.ola.org;bironmi@sen.parl.gc.ca;baconl@sen.parl.gc.ca;comail@lsuc.ca;citytvhosts@citytv.com;citydesk@tor.sunpub.com;city@thestar.ca;
christine.elliott@pc.ola.org;cowanj@sen.parl.gc.ca;cordyj@sen.parl.gc.ca;dhowlett@makepovertyhistory.ca;dinovoc-
qp@ndp.on.ca;dyckli@sen.parl.gc.ca;dininc@sen.parl.gc.ca;debanp@sen.parl.gc.ca;dayja@sen.parl.gc.ca;
dawsod@sen.parl.gc.ca;editor@rd.ca;editor@tor.sunpub.com;elizabeth.witmer@pc.ola.org;egglea@sen.parl.gc.ca;ernie.hardeman@pc.ola.org;fureyg@sen.parl
.gc.ca;frasej@sen.parl.gc.ca;fortim@sen.parl.gc.ca;
fitzpr@sen.parl.gc.ca;fairbj@sen.parl.gc.ca;gustal@sen.parl.gc.ca;grafsj@sen.parl.gc.ca;goldsy@sen.parl.gc.ca;gilla@sen.parl.gc.ca;gautht@sen.parl.gc.ca;gcar
lino@ombudsman.on.ca;hublee@sen.parl.gc.ca;
hervic@sen.parl.gc.ca;haysd@sen.parl.gc.ca;harbm@sen.parl.gc.ca;joyals@sen.parl.gc.ca;johnsj@sen.parl.gc.ca;jaffem@sen.parl.gc.ca;jcrivest@sen.parl.gc.ca
;julia.munroco@pc.ola.org;kfl@sen.parl.gc.ca; kinsen@sen.parl.gc.ca;kennyco@sen.parl.gc.ca;
lachah@sen.parl.gc.ca;losier@sen.parl.gc.ca;lebrem@sen.parl.gc.ca;lavigr@sen.parl.gc.ca;communications@ps.gc.ca;mcgeed@sen.parl.gc.ca;munsoj@sen.parl
.gc.ca;moorew@sen.parl.gc.ca;mitchg@sen.parl.gc.ca; milnel@sen.parl.gc.ca;merchp@sen.parl.gc.ca;mercet@sen.parl.gc.ca;meighen@sen.parl.gc.ca;
mccoye@sen.parl.gc.ca;massip@sen.parl.gc.ca;mahovf@sen.parl.gc.ca;nejmcust@mms.org;nimhinfo@nih.gov; mbryant.mpp@liberal.ola.org;
mininfo@mah.gov.on.ca;nolinp@sen.parl.gc.ca;
onbox@ps.gc.ca;olived@sen.parl.gc.ca;pm@pm.gc.ca;pdowne@sen.parl.gc.ca;prudhm@sen.parl.gc.ca;poyv@sen.parl.gc.ca;
poulim@sen.parl.gc.ca;phaleg@sen.parl.gc.ca;pepinl@sen.parl.gc.ca;pkormos-
qp@ndp.on.ca;stratt@sen.parl.gc.ca;stollp@sen.parl.gc.ca;stgerg@sen.parl.gc.ca;spivam@sen.parl.gc.ca;smithd@sen.parl.gc.ca;
sibnic@sen.parl.gc.ca;smithc@sen.parl.gc.ca;szwebmaster@yahoo.com;tkachd@sen.parl.gc.ca;tardic@sen.parl.gc.ca;vanlop0@parl.gc.ca;vanlop1@parl.gc.ca;
web@ps.gc.ca;webadmin@justice.gc.ca;wattc@sen.parl.gc.ca; whistleblower@ctv.ca; zimmer@sen.parl.gc.ca; info@cjc-ccm.gc.ca
rbartolucci.mpp.co@liberal.ola.org; cbentley.mpp@liberal.ola.org; mbountrogianni.mpp@liberal.ola.org; jbradley.mpp@liberal.ola.org;

lbroten.mpp@liberal.ola.org; dcansfield.mpp@liberal.ola.org; dcaplan.mpp@liberal.ola.org; machambers.mpp.co@liberal.ola.org;
cdicocco.mpp.co@liberal.ola.org; ldombrowsky.mpp@liberal.ola.org; dduncan.mpp.co@liberal.ola.org; mkwinter.mpp@liberal.ola.org;
mmeilleur.mpp.co@liberal.ola.org; speters.mpp@liberal.ola.org; gphillips.mpp.co@liberal.ola.org; spupatello.mpp@liberal.ola.org;
lbroten.mpp@liberal.ola.org; pfonseca.mpp.co@liberal.ola.org; htakhar.mpp.co@liberal.ola.org;
dramsay.mpp.kirklandlake@liberal.ola.org;gsmitherman.mpp.co@liberal.ola.org; gsorbara.mpp.co@liberal.ola.org; vdhillon.mpp@liberal.ola.org;
bduguid.mpp@liberal.ola.org; kflynn.mpp@liberal.ola.org; ljeffrey.mpp@liberal.ola.org; kkular.mpp@liberal.ola.org; mcolle.mpp@liberal.ola.org;
jbrownell.mpp@liberal.ola.org;bbalkissoon.mpp@liberal.ola.org; warthurs.mpp@liberal.ola.org;Nicholson.R@parl.gc.ca; Emerson.D@parl.gc.ca;
Blackburn.J@parl.gc.ca; Thompson.G@parl.gc.ca; Solberg.M@parl.gc.ca; Strahl.C@parl.gc.ca; Lunn.G@parl.gc.ca;
MacKay.P@parl.gc.ca; Hearn.L@parl.gc.ca; Day.S@parl.gc.ca; Skelton.C@parl.gc.ca;Toews.V@parl.gc.ca;Ambrose.R@parl.gc.ca; Finley.D@parl.gc.ca;

pm@pm.gc.ca; OConnor.G@parl.gc.ca; Oda.B@parl.gc.ca; Prentice.J@parl.gc.ca; Baird.J@parl.gc.ca; Bernier.M@parl.gc.ca; Cannon.L@parl.gc.ca;
Clement.T@parl.gc.ca; Flaherty.J@parl.gc.ca; Verner.J@parl.gc.ca; Hill.J@parl.gc.ca; Kenney.J@parl.gc.ca; Ritz.G@parl.gc.ca; Guergis.H@parl.gc.ca;
Paradis.C@parl.gc.ca;dwatch@web.net;info@ocsj.ca; ocap@tao.ca;info@olderwomensnetwork.org; terryoc2001@yahoo.ca; adavidov@torontohabitat.on.ca;
justice@socialjustice.org;info@chfc.ca
sandra.conlin@rcmp-grc.gc.ca; robin.roberts@cpc-cpp.gc.ca; gsmith@chrt-tcdp.gc.ca; AdamsoV@erc-cee.gc.ca; potterl@scc-
csc.gc.ca;phil.jensen@servicecanada.gc.ca;AdamsoV@erc-cee.gc.ca; josee.dubois@psst-tdfp.gc.ca; elisabeth.nadeau@ps.gc.ca; mmacpherson@pco-
bcp.gc.ca; dgrandmaitre@gg.ca; tpulcine@privcom.gc.ca; aleadbea@infocom.gc.ca; clgascon@fja.gc.ca; plourded@nafta-sec-alena.org; francois-
giroux@cas-satj.gc.ca;bob.ward@chrc-ccdp.cadp.ca; info@police.york.on.ca; info@cba.org; mail@cba-alberta.org; edmonton@cba-alberta.org;
cba@bccba.org; cba-mba@mts.net; admin@cbanb.com; cba-nl@nl.rogers.com; cbanwt@lawsociety.nt.ca; cbans@ns.sympatico.ca; info@oba.org; cba-
pei@isn.net; info@abcqc.qc.ca; cba.sk@sasktel.net; cbayukon@internorth.com
77
Individual Guaranteed Charter Rights and Freedoms
The Federal Government signed sealed and delivered the
Whereas Canada is founded on principles that recognize

the supremacy of God and the rule of law

1. The Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms guarantees the rights and freedoms set out in it
subject only to such reasonable limits prescribed by law as can be demonstrably justified in a
free and democratic society.
2. Everyone has the following fundamental 7. Everyone has the right to life, liberty and
freedoms: (a) freedom of conscience and security of the person and the right not to be
religion; (b) freedom of thought, belief, deprived thereof except in accordance with the
opinion and expression, including freedom of principles of fundamental justice.
the press and other media of communication;
12. Everyone has the right not to be subjected
(c) freedom of peaceful assembly; and (d)
to any cruel and unusual treatment or
freedom of association.
punishment.
15. (1) Every individual is equal before and under the law and has the right to the equal
protection and equal benefit of the law without discrimination and, in particular, without
discrimination based on race, national or ethnic origin, colour, religion, sex, age or mental or
physical disability.
Credence must be given to that which is least likely to be mistaken by humankind
The evidence I have provided to the Commission for Public Complaints Against the RCMP on
November 8 2007, File No. PC-2007-2316 and ….2317 has been forwarded to the Commissioner of
the RCMP for appropriate action and acknowledged November 16 2007 File 2007-1355445 proves
irrefutably the Constitution (Establishment) administers and enforcers of the Constitution (Document)
are not only incompetent to that endeavor but have deliberately put a modus operandi in place
conducive to the well being and benefit of the immoral of society to the humongous detriment of the
moral majority who not only finance the system but are deliberately estranged from their individual
guaranteed Charter Rights.
Whereas the intent of the supreme law of Canada, the Constitution Act, 1982 which recognizes the
supremacy of God is to establish the spirit in which the Constitution (Establishment) is to structure a
system consistent and conducive to a moral society where every individual is guaranteed equality of
protection and benefit in all matters before and under the law
These nincompoops or conspirators, whichever you prefer have in fact structured a team of legal
specialists, members of the Law Society of Upper Canada to implement the Constitution in a manner
profitable to all the members of the Society and in their enthusiasm lost track of their original
legitimate purpose which of course was to put an efficient legal system in place capable of maintaining
the spirit of the Law in the spirit of God in the spirit of the moral majority who finance them to do so
and by their avarice indulgence have created a team of backasswards, highly skilled at scoring on our
own net.
I have presented the evidence for the distinct purpose of getting them the puck out of here and to put
personnel in place coherent to the Constitution intent to consistently score against the immoral until
they “cry uncle” After all that is what they are paid and authorized to do. Right?
78
subject only to such reasonable limits prescribed by law as can be demonstrably justified in a
free and democratic society.
In a free and democratic society every individual is responsible for their own actions and must be
consistently in the spirit and in compliance with the Law and as a whole must decide what is
justifiable. A Public Inquiry is demanded to determine what is justifiable
The government (Establishment) has not demonstrated a modus operandi capable of backing the
individual’s guaranteed Charter Rights and in fact the evidence I have provided has demonstrated their
established modus operandi is precisely contrary to their legitimate purpose to structure a system
consistent with the spirit of the Constitution to protect and benefit the people of a moral society where
each individual is presumed moral and in compliance with the spirit of the Constitution until such time
as evidence is provided to the authority having jurisdiction of ones non compliance whereas every
effort must be made in the spirit of the Law to substantiate the veracity of the accusation and the
preliminary evidence.
Where there exists a victim there most definitely exists a perpetrator and any evidence relative to the
circumstance linking one to the crime must be scrutinized for validity and any interference to the
initiative of discerning the truth is inconsistent with the intent of the spirit of the Law and in fact
obstruction of Justice.
Due consideration must be given to the priority stated or implied by the guarantee itself where due
diligence to the support of the guarantee must be irreproachably applied with fortitude and conviction,
FFF, Forthright, Forthcoming and Forthwith whereas the individual’s guaranteed Charter Rights and
Freedoms are contingent on the presumption one is in consistent compliance with the Law and where
evidence is presented to the authority of jurisdiction suggesting one has acted to the contrary the
presumption has been compromised and they are called upon to cooperate in the spirit of the Law to
demonstrate they are of the spirit of the Law where any demonstration to the contrary is to the
detriment of the spirit of the Law and the people who finance the entire system.
It is prudent to mention that the Federal Government personnel are representatives of the people who
must be irreproachable to the spirit of the Constitution and the money they spend is the people’s and
they must be able to demonstrate a modus operandi capable of assuring the money is used efficiently
and effectively as per the intent.
A person accused of a crime supported by reasonable evidence is obliged to cooperate in the spirit of
the Law and the people and failure to do so is obstruction of Justice and adds to the expense of
achieving Justice which is inherently passed on to the people depriving them of their money and right
to efficient effective Justice implicating the alleged further distancing them from their pure
uncompromised legitimate guaranteed Charter Rights and Freedoms.
If logical recourse consistent with the evidence provided against them is to search their premises or any
personal property they must permit it or be charged with obstruction of Justice.
One must ask why they would object if they were of the spirit of the Law which they must be to be in
compliance with the Law and most particularly what would they have to hide other than implicating
evidence.
Any evidence acquired in the investigation implicating them to other crimes must be held against them
to which they must be brought to court to answer for.
79
The Law isn’t a game for the lawyers to play and profit from but an entity financed by the people to
assure their guarantee of protection and benefits are indeed guaranteed as provided by the Constitution.
Anyone who has committed a crime against anyone has committed a crime against the people who
ultimately finance the whole damn system and such a person is a detriment to the whole of society
where due diligence must be applied to rehabilitation and bringing them on side with the spirit of the
Law and the people of the moral society guarantied by the Federal Government being the people.
Persistence must be to nipping immorality in the bud and to that endeavor the Law must be initiated at
home where the parents must be held responsible for their children until they reach the legal age where
the administers and enforcers of the Law take over responsibility.
The Law is the spirit of society as a whole where the government (establishment) has been assigned the
responsibility to act representative of the people and due diligence is demanded to ensure they act
responsibly consistent with and conducive to the spirit of the Constitution and the spirit of the people
whose lives and well being and the state of the nation are dependent on their adeptness to the task being
number one in priority of initiatives mandatory to the government establishment financed and entrusted
to administer and enforce the Law consistently in the spirit of the Law and the people, where every
individual is equal in all matters of Law where the right to vote is irrelevant as a major number of these
individuals are prohibited from voting due to age and these people are wholly dependent on
government personnel doing their jobs in respect of their individual guaranteed Charter Rights and
Freedoms as well as the guaranteed Charter Rights and Freedom of all the people who do vote which
Charter rights are equally the same irrelevant to the opinions of the elected representatives who are
mandated to represent all the people equally in matters of their equal individual guaranteed Charter
rights.
Any government personnel who acts in non compliance with the Law does so on his or her own
personal initiative and are responsible for their own actions and will not be defended by the Federal
Government which is the people and all contracts of entitlements of employment to provide service to
the people and society as a whole are null and void upon conviction and where evidence has been
submitted to a government department having jurisdiction in such matters of a government employees
non compliance with the Law it is incumbent upon such department to commence or cause to
commence appropriate proceedings to determine the truth and upon conviction every effort must be
made to recover all benefits paid to such person from the earliest date of which such person was found
guilty to have committed.
The individual’s guaranteed Charter Rights and Freedoms are a fixed entity attached as an arm or a leg
with no restrictions in continuity commencing at the time of enactment of the Constitution in 1982 to
perpetuity where no government personnel has any legitimate authority to negate at any time without
the support of the people they are obliged to represent in the spirit of the Law they are bound to adhere
to and provide service to the people consistent with and conducive to their guaranteed individual
Charter rights.
I am of the opinion it is the Prime Minister of Canada who has the ultimate responsibility to assure the
government personnel are adept to the responsibility of backing the guarantee to each and every
individual as guaranteed and defined in the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms whereas he has
been granted the trust and authority by the people of Canada to act consistent with and conducive to the
individual’s guaranteed Charter Rights which are fixed, not to be debated nor a matter of his opinion or
anyone else’s as they are clearly defined and to be observed in the spirit of the Law and the spirit of
God which preceded him.
The individual’s guaranteed Charter Rights are fundamental to the Constitution and the very spirit
which Canada is founded on and it is incumbent upon every government personnel financed in the
service of our Country and the people to ensure due diligence to the guarantee. 80
Where evidence has been provided to the authority of jurisdiction it is incumbent upon them to present the
evidence to the alleged and bring them before the courts immediately to account for his or hers treasonable
actions where the only evidence he or she can present is he or she did initiate appropriate action as required to
maintain the continuity of the individual’s guaranteed Charter rights.
The responsibility to back the Federal Government’s Charter guarantee to the individual is ultimately the
responsibility of the people themselves who have entrusted their elected representatives to spend the people’s
money efficiently and effectively consistently in the spirit of the Constitution in the spirit of the people where
each individual’s Charter rights are one and the same with each other of the Constitution of fixed value for
perpetuity. Evidence must be presented to the people: Public Inquiry
I reiterate the individual’s guaranteed Charter rights are fixed stable in continued perpetuity no matter which
way the wind blows, no matter who is elected to power and where seemingly interrupted by any authority are not
and can not be and any person or persons artificially interrupting one’s guaranteed Charter rights will be charged
to compensate for damages and costs incurred including time and effort
endured along with mental anguish and other such detriments with the person or person’s responsible
made to pay from their own pockets whereas they acted on their own accord without legal authority
inconsistent with and non conducive to the Law they were obliged and sworn to uphold.
Due the seriousness of such an offense leaving the stability of the Constitution and the sanctity of the people’s
individual guaranteed Charter rights blowing in the wind it is incumbent upon the authorities having jurisdiction
in such matters to attend to the matter FFF where the person or person’s must be immediately relieved from duty
and immediately replaced with a responsible competent person adept to purpose.
To be clear the individual’s guaranteed Charter rights have nothing to do with politics yet where reasonable
evidence is brought forward of a political person being negligent in his or her duties in respect of an individual’s
guaranteed Charter rights it is a crime against all the people and the Constitution itself whereas one individual’s
guaranteed Charter rights are equal to every individual’s rights and every individual pays the consequence
directly or indirectly whether it be due the weakness of the system allowed to continue detrimental to their odds
of protection and unlikely assurance of equal benefit and of course we taxpayers suffer to the inevitable
consequences.
The Constitution (Establishment) is structured in accordance with the Constitution (Document) and the
government personnel know the chain of authority and who ever assigns limited authority to the various
departments and agencies retains all the responsibility obliged by the Federal Government to structure a system
consistent with and conducive to the support of the individual’s guaranteed Charter rights which does not
preclude them of any responsibility of their assigns for ultimately they are responsible to ensure the right people
are in place competent to the purpose assigned.
RCMP Commissioner William Elliot and the Commission for Public Complaints Against the RCMP
will give due regard to this document as they carry out their duties in accordance with the Constitution
(Document) with the same due regard to
52. (1) The Constitution of Canada is the supreme law of Canada, and any law that is inconsistent with
the provisions of the Constitution is, to the extent of the inconsistency, of no force or effect.
Whereas no one has limited authority to act in support of the Law in the spirit and of the spirit consistent with
and conducive to the moral society guaranteed to each individual under the Charter and it is your sworn duty to
uphold the Constitution and bring the evidence before the people for their decision as to whether the arbitrary
actions of the government personnel employed to administer and enforce the Constitution and back the guarantee
equally to every Canadian individual is demonstrably justifiable.
PUBLIC INQUIRY warranted and demanded.
There are no arbitrary time limits or specific procedures to hinder me in pursuant of my guaranteed
individual Charter rights for they belong to me in perpetuity and any such measures introduced by any
government personnel are indicative of their true intent not supportive of the individual’s guaranteed
Charter rights. All delays have been due to them.
81
I highly suspect this presentation of mine exposing the government conspiracy initiated by members of
the Law Society of Upper Canada is not common to usual complaints forwarded to you people to study
and given the extreme significance relative to the well being and benefits of the Canadian Individual’s
and the improbability of an unbiased approach to the review of the evidence and the certain probability
the alleged conspirators will have implemented purportedly legal procedures to appear as if the issues
were dealt with FFF, Forthright, Forthcoming and Forthwith I request in such circumstance you review
such arbitrary laws and policies with respect to their consistency with the Constitution ensuring they
are conducive to the individual’s guaranteed Charter rights.
I remind you the individual’s guaranteed Charter rights are fixed in perpetuity, nothing to be debated
and yet the modus operandi of the illegitimate legal system implemented by the government authorities
and practiced by the members of the Law Society of Upper Canada is designed to their benefit where
the odds against Justice being administered are higher than that of winning at the Casino or a Lottery.
This is evidenced in the correspondence between myself and the Law Society of Upper Canada where
if they had been FFF it would have taken them 2 or 3 days at most in sane manner to review the
evidence I presented them to know the particular lawyer I complained about was anything but that
which is required of him to act in a manner consistent with and conducive to my guaranteed Charter
rights in an endeavor to see Justice served.
When you review the Law Society of Upper Canada document which is to be found in 2 Parts by
clicking on the links near the top of the web site
http://groups.google.com/group/guardians-of-the-canadians-charter-of-rights-and-freedoms you will
note the efforts I made and length of time it took to have them address the issue effectively and
efficiently due the simplicity of the complaint and how after all the time they wasted the issue remains
unattended to.
The document is clearly indicative of the injustice that can be expected in the courts and throughout the
legal system operated by their members where they made every effort not to address the issue and
evidence tabled attentive to support the integrity of their member and in so doing without effort to my
benefit provided me the irrefutable evidence of their nature not being compatible to administer and
enforce the Law consistent with and conducive to the Constitution (Document)
There was no possible way for them to account for the lawyer’s actions and their persistence not to
address the issues is consistent with those of the government personnel I addressed the relative issues
which I have presented to you.
I have written many times in the documents I have provided you the Law Society of Upper Canada
have either stated or implied in the said correspondence that they do not give a damn about the
individual’s guaranteed Charter rights and their members only obligation is to vigorously advance the
interests of their clients, alias the people who can afford their services.
May I suggest they have a particularly bad attitude as their members set out to administer and enforce
Justice consistent with the Constitution conducive to the individual’s Charter rights?
You will find throughout the Law Society document a simple question regarding the acquisition of a
copy of a contract the lawyer purported to have and since we are on the subject and it is pertinent to the
issues I have raised I request you acquire a copy of the said contract and enter it into evidence.
Is that too much to ask since I have no authority and by no coincidence the RCMP do.
82
I do expect under the auspices of the Constitution (Document) that all retrievable evidence will be
seeked and analyzed in pursuant of the truth where obvious omissions is contra productive to purpose.
Did you know in legal surveying which I spent 40 years at, all evidence found in support of or against
my decisions must be clearly noted on the face of the survey plan.
I will expect you both to respond to all the issues and the WHYs questioned in the Mad Glad mostly
Sad…Why? .doc which is to be found in the vicinity of the 2 Part, Law Society of Upper Canada
document on the aforesaid web site.
For your convenience I am also sending a copy of the Mad along with this document as an attachment.
There is another matter of relative importance which I request you address which government
personnel have refused to respond to.
The term “Threshold” has been used by YRP Deputy Chief Bruce Herridge and Sgt. Randy Craig OPP
Anti-Rackets to define an arbitrary line which purportedly legitimately deprives me of my right to
Justice and I expect you to question them to ascertain their intent as to the use of the word which they
have concluded my evidence didn’t toe the line.
I can guarantee you more assuredly than you can guarantee me my Charter rights are being protected
that a PUBLIC INQUIRY will be held one way or another and it would be prudent of you both to apply
yourselves to this endeavor FFF with attentiveness to due diligence to the most serious nature of this
exercise.
Should either of you have difficulty retrieving the evidence from my web site or require more
information I will be only too happy to accommodate and I request you do not hesitate to ask.
Perchance you are of good intentions I ask you to understand and forgive my attitude which has
acquiesced over the 2 ½ year trek so far to Justice not yet in sight.
I remind you there can be no legitimate arbitrary protocol set out to hinder my guaranteed Charter right
to Justice and there can be no limit to your authority to see that I get it.
52. (1) The Constitution of Canada is the supreme law of Canada, and any law that is inconsistent with
the provisions of the Constitution is, to the extent of the inconsistency, of no force or effect.
All that stands in the way is you …as Confucius says
“To know what is right, and not do it, is want of courage, or of principle”
Face it now or die a thousand deaths ….something like that and I don’t know who to attribute
it to but I do know who it concerns.
Me too, but I will die but once, one way or another and I prefer a surprise.
We all have our druthers but what will be will be.
Frank Gallagher 83
Whereas Canada is founded upon principles that recognize the supremacy of God and the rule of law

subject only to such reasonable limits prescribed by law as can be demonstrably justified in a free and
democratic society.
3. Every citizen of Canada has the right to vote in
2. Everyone has the following fundamental an election of members of the House of Commons
freedoms: (a) freedom of conscience and or of a legislative assembly and to be qualified for
religion; (b) freedom of thought, belief, opinion membership therein.
and expression, including freedom of the press 7. Everyone has the right to life, liberty and security
and other media of communication; (c) freedom of the person and the right not to be deprived
of peaceful assembly; and (d) freedom of thereof except in accordance with the principles of
association. fundamental justice.
12. Everyone has the right not to be subjected to any cruel and unusual treatment or punishment.
15. (1) Every individual is equal before and under the law and has the right to the equal protection and
equal benefit of the law without discrimination and, in particular, without discrimination based on race,
national or ethnic origin, colour, religion, sex, age or mental or physical disability.
The Federal Government enacted the Constitution Act, 1982 guaranteeing every individual
of Canada Charter Rights and Freedoms where it is ultimately their responsibility to structure a legal
system with competent irreproachable personnel with fortitude and conviction to administer and enforce
the Law consistent with and conducive to the Constitution whereas the individual is the most precious
commodity and the very backbone of the Constitution where each individual is responsible to conform
and abide by the spirit of the Constitution, the supreme Law of Canada which recognizes the supremacy
of God establishing the spirit to be that of a moral society where it is incumbent upon each individual to
respect the equal rights of every individual in Canada.
The concept couldn’t be simpler; after all we are all human beings with the same needs to sustain life.
Do not do to others Do unto others

What you do not want done to yourself As you would have them do unto you
Recompense injury with justice, and recompense kindness with kindness

Credence must be given to that which is least likely to be mistaken by man
That’s it, too simple, eh? That’s the spirit of the Law and yet the administers and enforcers don’t get it
WHY?
Bully, gang like mentality, a phenomenon which takes over when people get together in numbers.
Members of the Law Society of Upper Canada and associates are behind it all.
Because they are human beings, that’s WHY. Ignorant human beings who refuse to grow up
The Minister of Justice and Attorney General of Canada Robert Nicholson is a major player
84
Ultimately
How thea Prime
can such Minister
miscarriage Stephen
of justice beHarper
allowedistoresponsible and must be
exist in a democracy heldGod
where accountable.
is supreme?
I have presented evidence collected over 2 ½ years and the obvious analysis of it to the RCMP who have
to date November 27 2007 not been able to get their heads together as they have been caught up by the
befuddlement of circumstance as have we all.
When the obvious is not obvious there is something obviously wrong which happens to be the obvious.
The following is my analysis of the evidence and unbiased observation of the government personnel who
are mandated to administer and enforce the Law in Canada.
The story is true as are the facts which are to be found by clicking on link
http://guardians-of-the-canadians-charter-of-rights-and-freedoms.googlegroups.com/web/Mad
%20Glad%20mostly%20Sad%20WHY.doc
This document is a digest of my quest for justice as per common sense and that defined as my guaranteed
right as a Canadian individual as provided by the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms where many
obvious questions surfaced per circumstance providing obvious reason to investigate WHY I was not
getting the justice that belonged to me as per the guarantee granted me by the Federal Government in
1982.
The more I queried the more there was to query until eventually it became abundantly obvious the
government personnel at all levels of government didn’t give a damn about my individual guaranteed
Charter rights which culminated into one humungous WHY?
Sure, I was nobody special and far from it and a whole lot more annoying to the government
personnel because I refused to accept their indifferent attitude to my guaranteed rights.
Upon conversation and correspondence with various members of the York Regional Police fraud unit I
became aware that what has happened to me has happened over and over again to many others so much
so that the police have used their experience to determine what evidence and circumstance meets the
“threshold” to be able to proceed before the courts.
I found it somewhat discerning that two detectives I met with, Sgt. Fred Kerr and Cpl. George Rorke
stated that they could take similar evidence to a judge and one time a warrant will be granted and another
time denied and yet they didn’t bother taking my evidence for a warrant. They mentioned how often they
were frustrated by the courts and the immediate thought comes to mind as to why they are frustrated?
Are they just too ignorant to investigate the evidence to a proper conclusion or is it a problem with the
judge?
They also informed me I could take the matter to civil court but my lawyer would be negligent if he
didn’t inform me the odds of being reimbursed for my losses are slim.
Obviously if they felt they couldn’t get a warrant with many years experience dealing with the law my
chances was slim and foolish to throw good money after bad.
But wait a minute, what happened to my guarantee? My right not to be deprived. My equal right
to justice
and equal benefit of the law without discrimination and, in particular, without discrimination
based on race, national or ethnic origin, colour, religion, sex, age or mental or physical disability.
I can not even begin to imagine where the evidence I provided was lacking because every base was 85
covered. What was this arbitrary “threshold”? Nobody would respond to me.
I persistently wrote the YRP until Insp. Michael Flemming agreed to meet with me where he remained
steadfast with the original decision but agreed with me that it didn’t make sense but that’s “How it is”
He offered that’s the first thing they learn when they become cops that the law has nothing to do with
common sense which I agreed at the time but after an analysis of all the evidence using common sense I
have come to know for fact that it is not the Law that has nothing to do with common sense but the
administers and enforcers of it who are estranged from reality.
Nobody wanted to give me a written report though as to why the YRP wouldn’t investigate but through
persistence of written requests for a response I received one from Deputy Chief Bruce Herridge who
responded January 10 2006 using that word “threshold” again. See Lawyer File # 9 pages 19 & 20
I have written a prodigious number of times since requesting some answers to obvious questions such as
the meaning of the term “threshold” in reference to my situation which fell short to commence
proceedings and other obvious questions referenced above to no avail.
I never heard from them again until September 6 2006 when Phil Moreau of the Standards Branch of the
YRP phoned and talked for an hour discussing the Black Book dated September 1 2006 which I had
faxed Deputy Chief Bruce Herridge on September 5 2006.
I wrote Phil Moreau immediately after he hung up recapping our conversation but he never responded
On October 10 2006 Karen Knoakes # 440 Executive Officer of Public Complaints responded with
typical inane rhetoric I have come to know which does not address the issues or answer my questions and
then directed me to the Ontario Civilian Commission on Police Services should I not be satisfied with her
response.
I had 30 days from October 14 2006 the day I received it to do so but thought it a futile venture
presuming they would not address the issues or answer the questions either but after meeting with
Sergeant Randy Craig OPP Anti-Rackets on November 14 2006 and his decline to take a preponderance
of evidence I brought him for the OPP to review and some of the comments he made I realized I was into
one humongous government conspiracy. See Lawyer File # 8.
When I got home that day I decided to assemble the evidence to present to the Ontario Civilian
Commission on Police Services which I drove town to deliver the following day November 15 2006 with
just one day to spare to make the deadline of 30 days.
They did as expected routinely acknowledging they had reviewed the evidence without addressing it or
answering any of the obvious questions and cited me section so and so and the file is accordingly closed.
See Lawyer File # 10
All 15 Lawyer Files and others can be found on my web site http://groups.google.com/group/peoples-
law-society including the 2 Part Toronto Sun document which irrefutably proves the crimes were
committed and the various government agencies and departments and YRP were involved in the
conspiracy.
The evidence speaks for itself.

Of course it has yet to have the chance to speak to a legitimate capable investigative authority which acts
FFF with integrity conviction and fortitude consistent with the Constitution conducive to the individual’s
guaranteed Charter rights.
I have to admit the evidence doesn’t irrefutably prove the YRP and Commission are in on the conspiracy
but they are consistent with it and most certainly are inept to enforce the Law, the Constitution. 86
They are however persistently stubborn and ignorant as I have come to know the majority of government
personnel to be having spent 40 years in Legal Surveying beginning 10 years with the province and
ending with 14 years with the City of Toronto Property Management Surveys where I had joined them in
May 1990 leaving my manager position of a survey company in the private sector.
Government personnel tend to learn through observation and hand me downs acquiesced through time
generation to generation where they are reluctant to change not having full grasp as to what they are
actually intended to achieve. In matters of Law they can be huge pains in the asses as they can not relate
to anything other than “ this is how we’ve always done it” and they can at anytime produce a number of
well respected personnel to affirm their position.
In general I stood alone against them, me and the law that is which makes a decidedly huge difference
which I came to know early in my career.
I have no doubt the majority wanted to do what was right, they just didn’t know what was right and felt
comfort in numbers all believing they must be right because they have always done it this way or that.
It is somewhat exacerbating at times but you get use to their ignorance and eventually the word gets
around that I was right. I would never sign the notes unless I had investigated all the evidence thoroughly
and knew for a fact my final decision was consistent with the laws and every property owner got
precisely what they were entitled to by law.
I have had quite an extensive career and met all types and there was even the odd fool supervisor who
would tell me to change my notes and move a couple of survey stakes even after I pointed out a few
oversights. Just plain stubborn but after I realized he was not receptive to reasoning I would say okay
then you are the boss, and write a note in my report that so and so instructed me to do so and so against
my advice and demand he sign it. Always like the arrogant spoiled useless whatever they are off in a huff
and a puff and leave it my way, the right way according to law, common sense and according to the way
it was originally intended with everyone getting precisely what they bought and paid for.
So it’s not my first time at bat with such ignorance surrounding me but I must confess never has there
been so many against me but in the bye and bye it is the Law that counts and I am only the messenger.
Even though the incidences occurred in Ontario and the government personnel cited Ontario law which
they have come accustomed to and support each other in using them, they themselves are breaking the
Law, the supreme law of Canada where every individual is equal in all matters before and under the law
where
So inadvertently, through stubbornness, ignorance, incompetence and unwillingness to study the Law
or heed my writings have remained steadfast exactly where the conspirators wanted them adverse to the
spirit of the Law, the spirit of God and the spirit of the intended moral society to the benefit of the
immoral and the conspirators detrimental to the moral majority and their guaranteed Charter rights.
There is no readily available statistics for the numbers of victims caused by their ineptness to administer
and enforce the laws of Ontario consistent with the Constitution conducive to the individual’s guaranteed
rights nor is their any evidence of common sense being utilized by the various levels of administration
and enforcement as the evidence attests.
There is very convincing evidence of what I have come to know and stated of the government personnel.87
Common Sense Evolution
Please give your heads a shake, read carefully every word and think for God’s sake.
It is the immoral that is the enemy of the moral society promised by the Constitution
The guy without the evidence against him is definitely the good guy in any given case presented to you.
Ask yourselves how anyone can be expected to abide by the Law if it doesn’t make sense?
On page 1 I have copied some excerpts from the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms. What
is there that doesn’t make sense?
If the members of the Law Society of Upper Canada are not required to give a damn about the
individual’s guaranteed Charter Rights and these people administer and enforce the Law what are
the chances of an individual getting justice in their courts? Where’s the sense?
How can they be allowed to administer and enforce the Law inconsistently and adverse to the
individual’s guaranteed Charter rights? Where’s the sense?
If the Prime Minister is the legal representative of the people in the Constitution of Canada would
he not be obliged to ensure the government personnel are up to the challenge of administering and
enforcing the Law consistent with and conducive to the individual’s guaranteed Charter Rights
and Freedoms in respect of the people who elected him to represent them?
Who has more power than he and assuredly he has the eyes and ears of the media to do whatever it
takes to eradicate the government conspiracy against the people?
So having been provided the evidence why would he not use his authority for the people unless he
was in on the conspiracy?
Why would he enact the Federal Accountability Act if he didn’t know the government personnel
were irresponsible and unaccountable whereas all government personnel are responsible to do
their jobs as well as any person in the private sector?
Why wouldn’t they be held even more responsible and accountable when they are financed by the
people to do a most serious job which their lives, safety and well being are dependent on?
What chance does the individual have of accessing his individual guaranteed Charter rights when
the whole damn government doesn’t give a damn about the individual unless he finds a way to
organize the people in support?
Why should the individual need do anything other than submit his claim that his rights have been
compromised along with the evidence? After all he was guaranteed not to be deprived, Right?
What in hell kind of people are they who side with the immoral against the intended moral society?
Why wouldn’t the government be required to demonstrate due diligence to putting a modus
operandi in place consistent with and conducive to the individual’s guaranteed Charter rights?
88
Why do you suppose lawyers and politicians are low on the trust list and do you see any reason at
all they should be trusted?
Who in the Federal Government is responsible to back the guarantee of the individual’s Charter
rights If not the Prime Minister who appoints the Minister of Justice and the Attorney General of
Canada?
The Prime Minister appointed Mary Dawson as Commissioner of Ethics and Conflict of Interest
and Louis Theoret as Federal Ombudsman of Victims of Crime and Stockwell Day as Minister of
Public Safety and Vic Toews as President of the Treasury…formerly Minister of Justice. Right?
I am thinking he has great influence in the government goings on….Doncha Think?
Why does the government frown on whistleblowers who are only trying to help?
Why is it that when one party accuses another of wrong doings the party retorts with the wrong
doings of the accusor when they were in power?
Why is this allowed to go on and on?
Why is it all about politics and not the well being of the Canadian people?
Why do I get responses from the police “that this is just how it is”?
I know how it is and am complaining “How it is” is not “How it is supposed to be” by the Charter
Obviously I could go on for hours asking questions but it is my deliberate intent to get you, the
Commission for Public Complaints Against the RCMP and the RCMP Commissioner in the spirit
due the seriousness of the occasion.
You do see the very serious nature of the issues don’t you?
You at the very least see the necessity to appear as if you see the serious nature don’t you?
You do understand how important even the lowliest of us consider our individual guaranteed
Charter Rights and Freedoms?
You do understand common sense and its importance relative to the Law and how important the
necessity of a modus operandi adept to the support of the individuals Charter Rights and
Freedoms.
You do understand the significance of evidence and the necessity of a competent legal system
consistent with the Constitution and conducive to the justice of an individual’s guaranteed Charter
Rights.
You do see that it is the Federal Government who enacted the Constitution Act, 1982 and it their
responsibility to back the guarantee having accepted financial benefit to do so making it binding?
You do know they are responsible for their assigns. Right?
89
You do know there is only one legitimate way to deal with the issues, don’t you?
You do know how serious I take this and will do so until my eventuality?
You do know the time is well over due to make things right, consistent with the Law and a moral
society. Right?
Well all that remains is to wait and see.
Why not use the time in the right attitude doing your job to make things right consistent with the
Law, the spirit of God and the people of a moral society?
The people just want to live the life they are entitled to and it is the responsibility of the police to
see that they get it.
The Law is not complicated when common sense is applied where God is supreme
Everyone knows the meaning of these words except thieves and lawyers who set out ambiguous laws
beneficial to the immoral minority which they argue out in court for the lawyers benefit all at the expense
of the tax payer to the detriment of the victims and a moral society.
The government personnel has been structured and financed by the people to efficiently and cost
effectively provide the necessities of a moral society whereas immorality is a blight and it is priority one
to the guarantee of the Charter to structure a system attentive to the eradication of immoral inclination
where it is incumbent upon the government personnel to ensure staff is irreproachable to that endeavor.
This is fundamental to the Law where every individual is guaranteed equal Rights and Freedoms as
provided by the Federal Government in the Charter and they must be held responsible and accountable to
back the guarantee.
It is the responsibility of every individual to understand and obey the Law of the country and I reiterate
there can be no words clearer to define the Law than the words of Jesus who was most informed of the
aspirations attributed to God where the supreme law of Canada recognizes the supremacy of God..
Confucius
Shall I teach you what knowledge is? When you know a thing, to hold that you know it; and when
you do not know a thing, to allow that you do not know it. This is knowledge.
Do not do to others
C o n fu c iu s
5 5 1 B– 4C7 9 B C
What you do not want done to yourself
Recompense injury with justice, recompense kindness with kindness
90
You do not have to be religious to understand in fact one is more likely to understand if they are not a
religious fanatic for the message is clear and true to a moral society where often is the case religious
fanatics are prepared to follow the leader into war precisely contrary to the ideology.
“The people may be made to follow a course of action, but they may not be made to understand it”
“Learning without thought is labor lost, thought without learning is perilous”
The Obvious needs tending to
You can get to the east by going west but the shortest route is how the crow flies point to point
The members of the Law Society of Upper Canada are not required to give a damn about the individual’s
guaranteed Charter Rights and Freedoms and they are only obliged to vigorously advance the interests of
their clients.
How in hell can these people serve a moral society governed by the Constitution the supreme Law of
Canada which recognizes the supremacy of God where the federal Government has guaranteed
every individual equality in all matters before and under the Law as provided by the Charter.
It is incomprehensible that the police allow such absurdity of adversity to the Constitution and the
promised moral society which is the Federal government’s responsibility is to back the guarantee made to
every individual of Canada.
Every initiative must be directed to replace the incompetent irresponsible arrogant government personnel
with the prerequisite competent responsible personnel consistent with and conducive to the support of the
individual’s guaranteed Charter Rights which is FUNDAMENTAL to the foundation of the Constitution
and what Canadians stand for.
Idiotacracy must be immediately replaced Idealacracy
Where due diligence in sane format is mandatory to the serious nature of the Idealogy
The present Federal Government personnel are in Conflict of Interest to administer and enforce the Law
consistent with and conducive to the individual’s guaranteed Charter Rights and Freedoms.
91
Under the Federal Accountability Act, 2006 Mary Dawson has been appointed Commissioner of Ethics
and Conflict of Interest and has been mandated with the responsibility to address relative complaints and
as a citizen of Canada I hereby file a complaint with the Commissioner against the Federal Government
personnel referenced within my writings and published on my web site
http://groups.google.com/group/guardians-of-the-canadians-charter-of-rights-and-freedoms who by their
actions documented therein are in conflict of interest of the moral society guaranteed by the Constitution
(Document).
The irrefutable evidence published on my web site http://groups.google.com/group/peoples-law-society
Ultimately the responsibility to back the guarantee of the Charter is with the Federal Government and I
have provided the evidence to the Prime Minister Stephen Harper, the Minister of Justice and Attorney
General of Canada and the Minister of Public Safety Stockwell Day who have declined to act responsibly
in appropriate manner consistent with the Constitution and in fact have demonstrated their persistence in
continuity of inane rhetoric conducive to a government conspired against the people in Conflict of
Interest of the foundation of Canada, the Constitution and the well being of every individual guaranteed
Charter rights.
Commissioner Mary Dawson

Commissioner of Ethics and Conflict of Interest
Federal Government.
I hereby request you study my complaints addressed in the aforesaid web sites and take appropriate
action to bring the pertinent government personnel on side with the law whereas a PUBLIC INQUIRY
is mandatory given the befuddlement of circumstance.
Your immediate attention is required
Thank you
Frank Gallagher
Frank Gallagher
PS
Should you have any difficulty accessing the evidence from the web sites or should you require further
evidence or understanding pleas do not hesitate to contact me at franklyone@hotmail.com
The face of justice must be identified and made to face justice in pursuant of justice for all
92
This way up This way down
There were no dates in this history but scrawled this

Do not do to others what you would not way and that were the words BENEVOLENCE,
do to yourself RIGHTEOUSNESS and MORALITY…finally I
Recompense injury with justice and began to make out what was written between the
recompense kindness with kindness lines; the whole volume was filled with a single
phrase:
The lord helps EAT PEOPLE
those who help
themselves
Heaven is to die for but there is a better way
The Constitution is the tool but in the hands of fools
The deceitful Mind Is betrayed by the Body

Reality is the truth impervious to perception yet reality is precisely due to perception
A Constitution not enforced is as superfluous as a brain not used
The Proof of the Truth of the Government Corruption and

Conspiracy has been published on my webs site for all to see
including Commissioner William Elliot of the RCMP
I have filed a complaint with the “Commission For Public Complaints Against The
RCMP” for refusing to investigate Government corruption and conspiracy and
under the RCMP Act the Commissioner was required to acknowledge receipt of
the complaint by Christmas Day at the latest. The Commissioner was suspected to
be in on the conspiracy and his failure to comply with the Act has seriously
implicated him whereas a Public Inquiry is the only sane recourse to resolve the
issues. I have attached the pertinent evidence.
93
December 27 2007
Fax 604-501-4095

Frank Gallagher
Manager, CST RET.
Re: File No. PC-2007-2317 GCCRF
Dear Andree Leduc
In response to your letter of December 20 2007 (copy attached) I thank you for admitting your
incompetence and lack of authority to deal with the issues of Government corruption and conspiracy
which are of a pressing concern to me and in my opinion should be a pressing concern to you but
obviously you are oblivious to that reality, understandable however because I have a firm grasp of it.
You have stressed once again, that the purpose of the Commission is to provide the public with an
opportunity to make complaints concerning the conduct of the members of the RCMP in the
performance of their duties.
I understand you have neither the expertise nor the legal authority to permit you to become involved
in issues beyond the scope of this mandate.
It is important to note that I am alert to the narrow minds of government personnel and your limited
respect for the individuals of the moral majority not in the employ of the government services and
your persistence to insult our intelligence.
Let me put emphasis on the fact that I thank you as a citizen of Canada being an individual of the
public, for the opportunity to make a complaint concerning the conduct of the members of the RCMP
in the performance of their duties and in fact, as you are aware I have taken advantage of your
generosity, however I must also emphasize I am a taxpayer and I suggest you keep that in mind
should you care to continue in your endeavors.
Your admittance, and though appreciative of your integrity, is discerning that you are incompetent but
admittance is the first step to the cure.
Integrity is an exceptionally wonderful trait rare in the employ of the government and we can not
afford to lose you.
If it would give you any satisfaction I am incompetent too having no experience in dealing with a
government conspiracy when I began back on June 30 2005 even though I was aware of persistent
government corruption and conspiracy as we all are I never had substantial evidence of it, but with
confidence in my integrity and ability to think things out I set out to prove it and now confident that I
have a voluminous, and I thank you for that word because I have been stuck with “ a preponderance”
and “ a prodigious” which I thanked Karen Knoakes #440 of the York Regional Police” for, to
94
describe the amount of irrefutable evidence I have supplied to a voluminous number of government
personnel who have refused to deal with the issues published on my web site implicating them in the
conspiracy.
At this moment I will accept the fact you are incompetent which you have admitted and demonstrated
and will offer you some suggestions with the endeavor to keep you out of trouble and more useful to
the Canadian people.
I have filed a complaint against two members of the RCMP for failing to investigate government
conspiracy as you are aware and have acknowledged in your letter of November 8 2007 (copy
attached)
There is little needed to investigate the complaint for all that is required to do is ask the officers
involved and they will confirm it.
On my complaint I identified my mother as witnessing the refusal by Sergeant Roy Steinebach on

October 18 2007 so I doubt there will be any denying of that which I complained about. Too simple
so far right?
What the issue will be is whether or not the RCMP had the right to refuse to investigate the evidence
which they may if it is considered trivial, frivolous, or vexatious.
I believe the complaint itself is evident that it is not trivial, Right?
Is it frivolous or vexatious?
You don’t know right?
That is why I have been forwarding the evidence to you in advance so as to provide you the
opportunity to familiarize yourself with it and to get your mind thinking in appropriate manner due
the serious nature of the issues..
Your admittance of your incompetence and inexperience to that endeavor is discerning I reiterate but
never the less you will be called upon to make that very important decision.
At some point a public hearing will be in order and it would be prudent for the Chair to assign a
competent panel to the task and to that endeavor I heartedly suggest you study the evidence published
on my web site.
With due regard to your present ineptness I advise that attentiveness to the issues in the document
Law Society of Upper Canada Part 1 Part 2 will suffice to determine whether or not the members of
the RCMP who I have complained about are negligent in performance of their duties.
I have presumed you people are not members of the legal profession and that is precisely what is
required of a jury in this instance not being biased, well perhaps that is not entirely correct, however
all that is required is a sane mind of integrity although one or the other is in question due your letter
to me but it will all become clear as we proceed.
95
You will find that Law Society document at the top of the page on my web site
I remind you there will be no authority provided by the government conspirators to any person, or
government department or agency to take them out and likewise there will be no cooperation from
anyone under the influence of the conspiracy and in fact when they become aware of this document
will attempt to interfere with you in performance of your duty and I suspect they will be very
convincing as they continue to obstruct justice. Perhaps you have already consulted with them.
I dare say they will be successful in their initiative but at that time if you were to take the news to the
media you will be assured a prominent spot in the hearts of the moral majority and you will play a
major role in the restructuring of the system consistent with and conducive to the support of the
Charter guarantee.
Adversely the consequences are unpredictable though will certainly be detrimental to some
significant degree of your concern.
Take a few moments if needed to reason that out and then keep it firmly and prominent in mind.
Given the serious nature of the issues and our inexperience at dealing with such issues it is of the
utmost importance to get the evidence into experienced hands and most importantly responsible
hands which is an improbability due the fact the entire legal system is corrupt and involved in the
conspiracy, which at the moment I am giving you the benefit of the doubt due to the lack of
irrefutable evidence.
To that endeavour I expect full cooperation immediately consistent with your mandate, which must
be consistent with the Constitution.
I must advise that all correspondence with you will be published on my web site and failure to
respond to me in a timely manner will alter your status implicating you in the conspiracy.
The ultimate goal is obviously a Public Inquiry and I do expect full cooperation to that initiative
where it is the only viable option relative to the circumstances.
The Law Society document requires no professional experience to assess as to whether or not it
makes sense for members of the Law Society of Upper Canada to administer and enforce the law
consistent with and conducive to the supreme law of Canada, the Constitution Act, 1982 which
includes the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms which guarantees every individual equality in
protection and benefit in all matters before and under the law.
I suggest you make particular note of that.
Throughout my documents published on the web I have copied excerpts from the Charter but for your
convenience I provide you this.
I should mention that I am 65 years old and do not intend to spend the rest of my life tending to a
simple matter of bringing down the government conspiracy and I expect you to respect my concerns.
I must say I was quite surprised, impressed and appreciative as to how quickly you processed my
96
original complaint to the RCMP.
Back to the matter on hand, the Law Society document, after reading you will be coherent to the fact
it is an improbability that members of the Law Society of Upper Canada who are required to
administer justice in accordance with the Constitution can do so when they are not required to give a
damn about the individuals guaranteed Charter rights which seriously compromises the guarantee,
wouldn’t you think?
Once you are cognizant to the facts study Lawyer Files # 1-3 found near the bottom of web site
http://groups.google.com/group/peoples-law-society which should convince you of the government
conspiracy and the need for a Public Inquiry.
So with expedience in mind with foresight, benefit of evidence they will continue in their reluctance
to investigate and being in receipt of their inane verbiage I will forward you a request for a review
and you may at that time ask the RCMP to conduct a further investigation of my complaint attentive
to the issues regarding the Law Society of Upper Canada Part 1 Part 2 document and Lawyer Files #
1-3 regarding obstruction of justice in a criminal fraud committed in front of a judicator in a public
building financed to administer justice consistent with the guaranteed Charter rights.
Their response to that will be most interesting and I presume there are provisions in the RCMP Act
for a timely response.
At this time, presuming they will not investigate the government conspiracy in its entirety, a public
hearing will be in order leading to a Public Inquiry which is imminent whether or not you cooperate.
Your cooperation is inevitable sooner or later and I needn’t expand on the benefits of sooner.
Should you need any assistance you will find me most cooperative to reasonable request.
I thank you in advance and hope I have made my intentions and that which is required of you
absolutely clear.
Due to your present status of incompetence I will not burden you with further documents presently
over your heads.
We will eventually get around to them one way or another.
Frank Gallagher
PS
I am an individual of Canada and I expect equal service and benefit of your office and demand you do
not delete any further e-mails I send you which will be and are your responsibility under your
mandate.
I also advise that by deleting evidence I provide you by e-mail, which is my right is tampering and
destroying evidence pertinent to a criminal prosecution along with obstruction of justice.
I remind you I have done nothing but act responsibly and it is you who are wanting, necessitating me
to attend to the matter.
To that endeavour I will expect an immediate acknowledgement of receipt as a reply e-mail with
contents of my request attached.
Should that fail I will apprise you of the evidence by other means available to me.
97
On receipt I will expect acknowledgement by e-mail with your assurance you will cooperate in a
manner consistent with and conducive to every individual’s guaranteed Charter rights and in
particular mine in efficient and effective manner with due regard to the rights of the tax payers.
These are most serious matters regarding the safety and well being of every individual in Canada and
must be dealt with due regard..
My web site and the public await your response which is of pressing concern to me and you if you are
coherent and susceptible to reason.
We will see.
It is absolutely ridiculous to use Canada Post which serves only to delay.
I am publishing everything on the web so there is no concern about privacy and confidentiality and it
would be an initiative showing your ability to think things out logically rather than stick to inane
policy due the circumstance where policy will not allow you to take affirmative action against
government corruption, conspiracy and Organized Crime as you will know when you study the
evidence.
I reiterate that you must study it to determine if it is trivia, frivolous or vexatious which it is
obviously not for the evidence is signed by government personnel and staff of the Law Society of
Upper Canada.
It’s all real, and yes you are involved with exposing it or attempting to cover it up because it most
definitely will get to a PUBLIC INQUIRY and so will you one way or another.
The consequences are your choice.
98
How would one
know when it was
received by the
Commissioner? I’ll
presume
November 16 2007
as per page 8
99
November 16 2007
How would one know a Friday so 3 days to
when it was actually deliver not counting
received? Saturday and
Did it sit on someone’s Sunday.
desk for a while or is it
acknowledged as it
comes in?
Obviously not the Commissioner nor is

the letter head the Commissioner’s.
I will tentatively presume this to be

standard procedure making the report
due 30 days from November 16 2007
being December 16 2007 allowing 5
days mail delivery December 21 2007
100
Received by mail
Dec.23 2007
December 31 2007 Resent by e-mail
Andree Leduc
Complaints Against RCMP
Please see attachment “Commission RCMP

Complaints Dec. 27 2007” and immediate response
required
January 2 2008 Out with the old….In with the new.
Andree
Having not received acknowledgement of receipt of e-mail I am now forced to send by fax at
undue cost to me due your failure to cooperate in a manner conducive to the well being of
individual’s guaranteed Charter rights which are not being supported by government personnel,
severely compromising their safety and in direct defiance of the law and indifference to the
people who finance your services
Immediate response required …….Get up to speed……..Formal complaint coming soon

Frank Gallagher
101
January 4 2008
Andree Leduc
Commission For Public Complaints Against the RCMP
Re: Your Files PC-2007-2316

PC-2007-2317
Request for an immediate review of my complaint against the RCMP whereas RCMP
Commissioner William Elliot is in non compliance with the RCMP Act as defined on page 2
Step 1 is to an immediate public hearing with the initiative to a PUBLIC ENQIRY (see page 42)
Whereas I filed a complaint regarding the refusal of the RCMP to investigate Government
corruption and conspiracy evidence on my web sites.
His refusal to cooperate in compliance with the RCMP Act is consistent with my complaint against
2 members of the RCMP refusing to investigate the Government corruption and conspiracy
I have attached pertinent evidence of the RCMP refusal and non compliance with the RCMP Act
This document is published on the aforesaid guardians ……web site where the evidence
is irrefutable of the conspiracy and the RCMP Commissioner’s refusal to comply with the
RCMP Act implicating him in the government conspiracy.
Please take appropriate action as defined on page 42

Please acknowledge receipt. of this document.
Thank you
Frank Gallagher
102
January 3 2008
Stockwell Day
Minister of Public Safety
Ottawa, Canada K1A 0P8
It has been two months to the day since I responded (see pages 6-17) to the e-mail you sent me November 2
2007 dated October 2 g 2007 (see pages 12-13).
When you didn’t respond immediately I sent you another e-mail November 5 2007 (see pages 18-27)
You still have not responded to these e-mails which perhaps explains why the RCMP Commissioner William
Elliot has not sent me a status report which was due in compliance with the RCMP Act on or about December
16 2007 according to the November 8 2007 letter I received from Andree Leduc of the Commission for Public
Complaints Against the RCMP (see page 3)
On January 2 2008 I e-mailed the RCMP Commissioner requesting the status report ASAP (see pages 2-4)
I suspect the delay involves you, the Minister of Justice and Attorney General of Canada Robert Nicholson
and Prime Minister Stephen Harper but should you not be aware of his tardiness to comply with the Act I
thought it prudent to inform you so that you may look into the matter since you stated in your e-mail
“As Minister of Public Safety I am accountable to both Parliament and the public for the RCMP and must
ensure that the Force functions with full respect for Canada’s democratic traditions and the fundamental
rights and freedoms of Canadians.” and then went on to say ( see page 12)
“The Government is committed to a high standard of transparency and accountability and is taking action to
ensure government business is conducted in a responsible manner.”
I had serious doubt and mentioned that in my November 3rd and 5th and in fact that is what the purpose of this
entire exercise is about which has caused me to publish the evidence on my web site.
Nothing has changed since the enactment of the Federal Accountability Act, 2006 simply because
deception is traditionally your forte and modus operandi as Confucius said
“There were no dates in this history but scrawled this way and that across every page were the words
BENEVOLENCE, RIGHTEOUSNESS and MORALITY,,, finally I began to make out what was written between
the lines: the whole volume was filled with the single phrase: EAT PEOPLE”
Please take the initiative to comply with the law NOW in appropriate manner, not as you are wont to do.
An immediate response acknowledging receipt of this email accompanied with a statement that you will
endeavour to cooperate in a manner consistent with the Constitution conducive to the individual’s guaranteed
Charter rights is requested and expected. The status report please.
Frank Gallagher
103
January 2 2008
RCMP Commissioner
William Elliot
webmaster@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
Re: Professional Standards Unit

File # 2007-1355445
Dear Commissioner
On November 8 2007 I filed with the Commission for Public Complaints Against the RCMP
complaining that 2 members of the RCMP refused to investigate Government corruption and
conspiracy evidence on my web sites
and http://groups.google.com/group/peoples-law-society
I received acknowledgement from them dated November 8 2007 Files # PC-2007-2316 and
PC-2007-2317 stating in accordance with the RCMP Act they had forwarded my complaint to
you for appropriate action and you are required to acknowledge receipt of my complaint
within 45 days of receiving it and then provide me a status report every 30 days thereafter.
(See page 2)
I received acknowledgement of receipt dated November 16 2007 from the RCMP

Professional Standards Unit (see page 3)
It appears to me I should have received a status report from you dated December 16 2007 at
the latest making it well over due.
I would appreciate that status report ASAP please
Thank You
Frank Gallagher
104
105
106
107
November 3, 2007

Hon. Stockwell Day
Day.S@parl.gc.ca
Dear Stockwell Day
I very much appreciate the letter signed by you however informative it does not
address the issues.
A Public Inquiry is most definitely required on the public side, point of view as
these puppet Task Forces only address the issues of continuity in covering up the
conspiracy against the people perpetrated by the Attorney General's Office and
ultimately the government of Canada, all at the tax payers expense
I have watched you on CPAC and have had good vibes about you, but unfortunately
sanity tells me the smoother you are the further you will climb in the government
ranks but I also allow for naïve ignorance too as the police believing they are quite
intelligent as they are told at the beginning of their careers that the law has
nothing to do with common sense which should be the first clue as they train to be
ignorant detectives.
They just fall in line and when controversial topics come up like mine they consult
with the Attorney General or his agents, Crown Attorneys but ultimately they must lay
the charges and in the issues I have addressed the Ontario Attorney General is the
major player in the conspiracy against the people which the evidence I have
accumulated over the passed 2 years irrefutably proves which I am sure you are well
aware of.
This would be a venture into incurable absurdity questioning Michael Bryant if it is

okay to charge him with conspiracy and treason. It is quite possible he would say
sure go ahead and then when the ball is in his court he can decide whether or not to
prosecute himself, for he gets the final decision.
Anyway what would be the point of consulting with the Attorney General who would
obviously state I was confused and didn’t have a clue about the law and if the cops
had the slightest understanding other than what they are told and what they see
happen in court over and over again as their officers crawl away with their heads
between their toes frustrated as hell knowing full well the evidence met the criteria
of common sense which they still haven’t got the grasp of the law being nothing to do
with common sense.
How the hell can laws be obeyed if they have nothing to do with common sense and who
benefits when that is the case other than lawyers who have infested the whole legal
system with the people trusting that they will keep an eye on each other when in fact
the people should have each others backs watching the every move of these crooks as
they ravish the moral civilization as they sleep peacefully in trust.
Sure at the moment it seems like I have ventured into a trek of superfluous futility
greater than the challenge Christopher Columbus had getting ships to prove the world
was round but it was an eventuality that had to happen simply because the world is
round, spherical to be more correct.
You know as well as I do the evidence I have is irrefutable and if it ever gets out
to the public it will be supported by everything in reality and obviously due the
most serious nature of the issues you people are quite confident it will never see
the light of day and should there be signs of it nearing the light my lights will be
turned off which is no particular concern to me being an old 65 with my eventuality
approaching in any event.
108
That fact alone must surely tell you I am not addressing the issues for me or
financial gain but for the purpose that is long over due being done and if not for so
many fitting circumstances that perchanced upon me I would be golfing, fishing and
whatever my perceptions would be of the heavenly thing to partake in.
My Dick and Janeing you people is so obvious to Spot as is your responses which may
appear intelligent alone but when related to the evidence and the issues you address
are abundantly incompetent to the test and yet obviously would be judged by the
system in place as sane in the insane world you people have created.
The evidence which I have presented you all proves irrefutably it would go nowhere in
the present illegal system but a jury of the people could cause a most serious ruckus
which is definitely not my intention for I am a sane and moral person who has kept
his head when all around have lost theirs.
Do you have any idea what it feels like to be the only sane person in the world and
when the term common sense is used it is in reference to my way of thinking.
Sure it is a high improbability that I will get the information out and perchance I
do I will probably be certified insane but history will know the document to mean I
was sane as they peruse the insanity of the intelligence of man induced by the
government to ransack us poor ignorant fools.
I will tend to go on hoping to strike a chord perchance there is one amongst you who
would pick up on the necessity of giving sanity a chance before it is too late which
is quite possibly already a wee bit too late.
Well enough of the rambling for now as I bring your attention to the 2 attachments
which I have already circulated the Do your part.doc file.
I now make it abundantly clear that I want you to address the issues within these
documents, the aforesaid and the “Boomerang Democracy Resolve” FFF, Forthright,
Forthcoming, Forthwith consistent with The Law, the supreme law of Canada, the
Constitution Act 1982 whereas 25 years ago the individual’s Charter Rights and
Freedoms were guaranteed by the Federal government but they have not put a modus
operandi in place conducive to the guarantee and in fact have put a system in place
conducive to the members of the Law Society of Upper Canada who hold every position
in the legal system who the Law Society adamantly state or imply their members do not
give a damn about the individuals guaranteed Charter Rights which my evidence
irrefutably attests to.
Our Rights are guaranteed and are attached to the individual as an arm and a leg yet
it’s like pulling teeth to access them.
The lawyers charge us every time we care to access what is already ours and the
system is too costly making justice prohibitive for the moral majority.
The people finance the system to protect us as per our Charter Rights and then charge
us individually when we try to access the system which is a venture into futility
trying to find justice from members of the Law Society who don’t give a damn about
our Charter Rights
Now what the hell is that all about?
Yes, I am requesting a response to that question most definitely

The lawyers have built an empire from our tax money for their benefit and the
evidence is everywhere in reality and irrefutable within the contents of my writings
which the people whose e-mails are listed below have received.
109
I have also requested on many occasions, an answer to a very simple question from the
prominent people in matters of law whose e-mail addresses you will also find on page
15 of the Do your part.doc which now includes your Day.S@parl.gc.ca address.
I ask you all once again what the entity “threshold” means in matters of the law you
people administer and enforce in Canada.
In particular I would like to know what the term “threshold” means in reference to
the evidence I presented to you all in the Toronto Sun document dated October 8 2006
which the York Regional Police and Randy Craig of the OPP Anti-Rackets refer to as
the invisible delineator which the judge pulls from his or her hat to determine that
my irrefutable evidence did not chin the line considered to be the “threshold” which
determines whether or not they can commence or cause to commence proceedings in the
provincial courts?
The answer is obvious as is the no response to the question as is the refusal of all
the aforesaid people to bring the issues I have addressed to the public’s attention.
I request each and every individual whose e-mail address is on page 15 of the
attached document, “Do your part.doc(582KB)” to please respond to the “threshold”
question
The playing intelligently ignorant option has worn thin so I suggest demonstrating
another one of your initiatives to appear FFF.
Oh, it would be prudent to mention that the (4) Click on Preamble Federal correspondence Recap
October 9 2007 on page 11 of the Do your part.doc which is to be found on my web site Guardians of the
Canadians Charter of Rights and Freedoms http://groups.google.com/group/guardians-of-the-
canadians-charter-of-rights-and-freedoms quite convincing that you all were provided the opportunity
to prove your indifference to the individual’s guaranteed Charter Rights was fiction rather than truly the
Attorney General’s fiction which is in laymen terms conspiracy and treason when the people willingly
refuse to generously suspend their disbelief as per page 2 of the document behind the black bar which is to
be found on page 8 of the aforesaid Do your part.doc
I state once again as I have many times before, Do not befuddle the befuddlement any
further insulting the intelligence of our right to be ignorant of the fiction of the
traditionally unscrupulous ways of the members of the Law Society of Upper Canada who
are so bloody arrogant in their belief they are superior to God in their most
devilish ways.
Hon Stockwell Day
By all means inform me as to who else agrees with the no need for a Public Inquiry
into the RCMP pension fund scandal which was linked to the upper command and the DOJ
I noticed you copied your response to the DOJ confirming for me that he is aware of
the issues and the media confirms for me that he has done nothing to address these
issues which are of a most serious nature which Louis Theoret, Federal Ombudsman of
Victims of Crime understands which you will read in the
Preamble Federal correspondence Recap October 9 2007 document
Clearly the DOJ, Department of Justice
He closed the file leaving predictable victims at the mercy of the conspiracy.
With reference to your following statement with full respect for Canada’s democratic
traditions I dare say Canada’s democratic traditions are passe’ as of 1982 when the
110
individual’s Rights were guaranteed by the Charter necessitating a revamp of the
legal system so as to be competent to back the guarantee consistent with and
conducive to the provisions of the Charter
You state you are accountable to both Parliament and the public for the RCMP and must ensure the Force
functions with full respect for the fundamental rights and freedoms of Canadians and clearly the evidence
shows that Sgt. Michael Thomson of the RCMP was provided copies of Lawyer Files 1-14, 13A of which
lawyer File # 14 was addressed to him dated April 7 2007 which he has refused to respond to.
On October 18 2007 I and my mother went to the RCMP office on Harry Walker Blvd. south of Davis
drive with a prodigious amount of evidence which included copies of the 15 Lawyer Files, the 73 page
letter to the Toronto Sun dated October 8 2006 and a copy of the Dave Grech compiled correspondence
September 1 2007 and a copy of the recording of the Tribunal hearing which irrefutably proves that Don
Wilson filed a false and misleading information with the ORHT valued at $43,000 + which is an offense
under S.206 (2) of the Tenant protection Act, 1997 and committed the criminal act of fraud over $100,000
in a public building financed by the people of Ontario to administer justice to and for the people in
compliance with the Tenant Protection Act, 1997 and the criminal code of the Constitution Act, 1982.
Sgt Steinebeck met with us for about an hour and declined to take the evidence, which I had brought
because the RCMP web site stated they would not accept evidence by e-mail which I had provided all the
evidence to Sgt Michael Thomson by e-mail but he had declined to respond to it.
Sgt.Steinebech admitted he knew of me when I questioned him about a half hour into our meeting and he
went on to state that he already had copies of all the documents I had brought because they had received
them by e-mail and opened a file for them.
So the big question is why have they not commenced or caused to commence proceedings against Rick
Hennessey, Regional Director of the ORHT as per Lawyer File # 1, of tampering with the evidence and
refusing to file the afore mentioned charges against Don Wilson which makes Rick Hennessey guilty of
Obstruction of a landlord in pursuit of his rights under s. 206 (1) of the Tenant Protection Act, 1997 and
obstruction of justice in the matter of the criminal act of fraud under the Constitution Act 1982.
Dave Grech of the Investigations and Enforcement Unit of the Ministry of Municipal Affairs also declined
to file the charges as above and referred to in Lawyer File # 2 addressed to him.
Hon. John Gerretsen Minister of Municipal Affairs and Housing also refused to commence or cause to
commence proceedings on these issues as addressed to him in Lawyer File # 3 making him guilty of the
same charges as above and more as referred to in the said Lawyer File # 3 which also includes matters of
non consistencies with the Constitution.
The evidence also points to the same charges against the Attorney General Michael Bryant in Lawyer File
# 7 and conspiracy against the people along with other matters regarding non compliance with the
Constitution Act, 1982.
Everyone else referenced in the 15 Lawyer Files are also guilty of conspiracy against the people and
obstruction of justice under the Constitution Act 1982,
They have all received the evidence and have also been informed that should they have misplaced it they
can find it on my web site Guardians of the Canadians Charter of Rights and Freedoms
111
So you see “As Minister of Public Safety I am accountable to both Parliament and the public for the
RCMP and must ensure that the Force functions with full respect for Canada’s democratic traditions and
the fundamental rights and freedoms of Canadians.”
I believe you are accountable to the public for the RCMP failure to function with full respect for my
Charter Rights and Freedoms which are truly fundamental.
I take you at your word that you will ensure that the RCMP functions consistent with the Constitution
and conducive to my guaranteed Charter Rights and Freedoms and every other individual of
Canada whose guaranteed protection is dependent on punishment due the crime attentive to deterrence
which is the first line of defence in the guaranteed protection of the people.
If you should require any more evidence than that which has been provided to Sgt. Michael Thomson of
the RCMP please do not hesitate to request by e-mail at franklyone@hotmail.com
I trust you understand the serious nature of the issues regarding the conspiracy by the Attorney General
Michael Bryant and the evidence irrefutably proves the Ontario Government does not have a modus
operandi in place capable of backing the individual’s Charter Rights and Freedoms and in fact the modus
operandi in place is conducive to the benefit of the lawyers and criminal element extremely detrimental to
the moral majority.
Once again I state the evidence is all available on my web site Guardians of the Canadians Charter of
Rights and Freedoms http://groups.google.com/group/guardians-of-the-canadians-charter-of-rights-
and-freedoms where you will find links to 9 other web sites which contain the irrefutable evidence of
the Attorney General conspiracy.
A Public Inquiry is in order and I request you do so FFF
Frank Gallagher
Frank Gallagher
Cc
Day.S@parl.gc.ca
victimsfirst@ombudsman.gc.ca;Michael.Thomson@rcmp-rc.gc.ca;prevention@ps.gc.ca;randy.craig@jus.gov.on.ca;
communications@ps.gc.ca;McGuinty.D@parl.gc.ca;ahorwath-qp@ndp.on.ca;bakerg@sen.parl.gc.ca; brooksn@scc-
csc.gc.ca;bill.murdoch@pc.ola.org;
bob.runciman@pc.ola.org;bironmi@sen.parl.gc.ca;baconl@sen.parl.gc.ca;comail@lsuc.ca;citytvhosts@citytv.com;citydesk@tor.sunpub.com;
city@thestar.ca; christine.elliott@pc.ola.org;cowanj@sen.parl.gc.ca;cordyj@sen.parl.gc.ca;dhowlett@makepovertyhistory.ca;dinovoc-
qp@ndp.on.ca;dyckli@sen.parl.gc.ca;dininc@sen.parl.gc.ca;debanp@sen.parl.gc.ca;dayja@sen.parl.gc.ca;
dawsod@sen.parl.gc.ca;editor@rd.ca;editor@tor.sunpub.com;elizabeth.witmer@pc.ola.org;egglea@sen.parl.gc.ca;ernie.hardeman@pc.ola.org
;fureyg@sen.parl.gc.ca;frasej@sen.parl.gc.ca;fortim@sen.parl.gc.ca;
fitzpr@sen.parl.gc.ca;fairbj@sen.parl.gc.ca;gustal@sen.parl.gc.ca;grafsj@sen.parl.gc.ca;goldsy@sen.parl.gc.ca;gilla@sen.parl.gc.ca;gautht@s
en.parl.gc.ca;gcarlino@ombudsman.on.ca;hublee@sen.parl.gc.ca;
hervic@sen.parl.gc.ca;haysd@sen.parl.gc.ca;harbm@sen.parl.gc.ca;joyals@sen.parl.gc.ca;johnsj@sen.parl.gc.ca;jaffem@sen.parl.gc.ca;jcrive
st@sen.parl.gc.ca;julia.munroco@pc.ola.org;kfl@sen.parl.gc.ca; kinsen@sen.parl.gc.ca;kennyco@sen.parl.gc.ca;
lachah@sen.parl.gc.ca;losier@sen.parl.gc.ca;lebrem@sen.parl.gc.ca;lavigr@sen.parl.gc.ca;communications@ps.gc.ca;mcgeed@sen.parl.gc.ca
;munsoj@sen.parl.gc.ca;moorew@sen.parl.gc.ca;mitchg@sen.parl.gc.ca;
milnel@sen.parl.gc.ca;merchp@sen.parl.gc.ca;mercet@sen.parl.gc.ca;meighen@sen.parl.gc.ca;
mccoye@sen.parl.gc.ca;massip@sen.parl.gc.ca;mahovf@sen.parl.gc.ca;nejmcust@mms.org;nimhinfo@nih.gov;
mbryant.mpp@liberal.ola.org; mininfo@mah.gov.on.ca;nolinp@sen.parl.gc.ca;
onbox@ps.gc.ca;olived@sen.parl.gc.ca;pm@pm.gc.ca;pdowne@sen.parl.gc.ca;prudhm@sen.parl.gc.ca;poyv@sen.parl.gc.ca;
poulim@sen.parl.gc.ca;phaleg@sen.parl.gc.ca;pepinl@sen.parl.gc.ca;pkormos-
qp@ndp.on.ca;stratt@sen.parl.gc.ca;stollp@sen.parl.gc.ca;stgerg@sen.parl.gc.ca;spivam@sen.parl.gc.ca;smithd@sen.parl.gc.ca;
sibnic@sen.parl.gc.ca;smithc@sen.parl.gc.ca;szwebmaster@yahoo.com;tkachd@sen.parl.gc.ca;tardic@sen.parl.gc.ca;vanlop0@parl.gc.ca;van
112
lop1@parl.gc.ca;web@ps.gc.ca;webadmin@justice.gc.ca;wattc@sen.parl.gc.ca; whistleblower@ctv.ca; zimmer@sen.parl.gc.ca; info@cjc-
ccm.gc.ca
rbartolucci.mpp.co@liberal.ola.org; cbentley.mpp@liberal.ola.org; mbountrogianni.mpp@liberal.ola.org; jbradley.mpp@liberal.ola.org;

lbroten.mpp@liberal.ola.org; dcansfield.mpp@liberal.ola.org; dcaplan.mpp@liberal.ola.org; machambers.mpp.co@liberal.ola.org;
cdicocco.mpp.co@liberal.ola.org; ldombrowsky.mpp@liberal.ola.org; dduncan.mpp.co@liberal.ola.org; mkwinter.mpp@liberal.ola.org;
mmeilleur.mpp.co@liberal.ola.org; speters.mpp@liberal.ola.org; gphillips.mpp.co@liberal.ola.org; spupatello.mpp@liberal.ola.org;
lbroten.mpp@liberal.ola.org; pfonseca.mpp.co@liberal.ola.org; htakhar.mpp.co@liberal.ola.org;
dramsay.mpp.kirklandlake@liberal.ola.org;gsmitherman.mpp.co@liberal.ola.org; gsorbara.mpp.co@liberal.ola.org;
vdhillon.mpp@liberal.ola.org; bduguid.mpp@liberal.ola.org; kflynn.mpp@liberal.ola.org; ljeffrey.mpp@liberal.ola.org;
kkular.mpp@liberal.ola.org; mcolle.mpp@liberal.ola.org; jbrownell.mpp@liberal.ola.org;bbalkissoon.mpp@liberal.ola.org;
warthurs.mpp@liberal.ola.org;Nicholson.R@parl.gc.ca; Emerson.D@parl.gc.ca; Blackburn.J@parl.gc.ca; Thompson.G@parl.gc.ca;
Solberg.M@parl.gc.ca; Strahl.C@parl.gc.ca; Lunn.G@parl.gc.ca;
MacKay.P@parl.gc.ca; Hearn.L@parl.gc.ca; Day.S@parl.gc.ca; Skelton.C@parl.gc.ca;Toews.V@parl.gc.ca;Ambrose.R@parl.gc.ca;

Finley.D@parl.gc.ca; pm@pm.gc.ca; OConnor.G@parl.gc.ca; Oda.B@parl.gc.ca; Prentice.J@parl.gc.ca; Baird.J@parl.gc.ca;
Bernier.M@parl.gc.ca; Cannon.L@parl.gc.ca; Clement.T@parl.gc.ca; Flaherty.J@parl.gc.ca; Verner.J@parl.gc.ca; Hill.J@parl.gc.ca;
Kenney.J@parl.gc.ca; Ritz.G@parl.gc.ca; Guergis.H@parl.gc.ca; Paradis.C@parl.gc.ca;dwatch@web.net;info@ocsj.ca;
ocap@tao.ca;info@olderwomensnetwork.org; terryoc2001@yahoo.ca; adavidov@torontohabitat.on.ca;
justice@socialjustice.org;info@chfc.ca
sandra.conlin@rcmp-grc.gc.ca; robin.roberts@cpc-cpp.gc.ca; gsmith@chrt-tcdp.gc.ca; AdamsoV@erc-cee.gc.ca; potterl@scc-
csc.gc.ca;phil.jensen@servicecanada.gc.ca;AdamsoV@erc-cee.gc.ca; josee.dubois@psst-tdfp.gc.ca; elisabeth.nadeau@ps.gc.ca;
mmacpherson@pco-bcp.gc.ca; dgrandmaitre@gg.ca; tpulcine@privcom.gc.ca; aleadbea@infocom.gc.ca; clgascon@fja.gc.ca;
plourded@nafta-sec-alena.org; francois-giroux@cas-satj.gc.ca;bob.ward@chrc-ccdp.cadp.ca

Ministre de a Sécurité publique
OCT 2 g 2007
Mr. Frank Gallagher

frank.gaIIaghersympatico.ca
Dear Mr. Gallagher:
Thank you for your correspondence of July 19, 2007, regarding the Royal Canadian Mounted Police
(RCMP) pension fund as well as your concerns that rights under the Canadian Charter of Rights and
Freedoms are not being protected. I apologize for the delay in responding.
As Minister of Public Safety I am accountable to both Parliament and the public for the RCMP and must
rights and freedoms of Canadians.
The Government is committed to a high standard of transparency and accountability and is taking action to
ensure government business is conducted in a responsible manner. In order to deliver on its commitment to
make Government more accountable, on April 11, 2006, Canada’s new Government introduced the
Federal Accountability Act, which received Royal Assent on December 12, 2006. Through this Act, the
Government of Canada has introduced specific measures to help strengthen accountability and increase
transparency and oversight in Government operations. To clarify roles and responsibilities, the Federal
Accountability Act designates Deputy Ministers and Deputy Heads such as the Commissioner of the
RCMP as accounting officers who are accountable before the appropriate committee of Parliament to
answer questions related to their responsibilities.
Canada
-2-
The RCMP is an important national institution that plays a significant role in the safety and security of
Canadians; ensuring public trust and confidence is an important component of achieving that role.
113
Canada’s new Government has taken a number of recent steps in respect of this important national
institution.
On April 13, 2007, Mr. David Brown was appointed to lead an independent investigation into allegations
relating to the RCMP pension and insurance plans. The mandate for this investigation gave Mr. Brown the
flexibility to recommend whether a more formal inquiry was necessary to address any outstanding
questions. In his report, submitted to the Government on June 15, 2007, Mr. Brown recommended that no
formal inquiry was necessary. I have closely reviewed Mr. Brown’s report and have accepted all of his
recommendations.
On July 16, 2007, the Government announced the creation of a five-member Task Force on Governance
and Cultural Change in the RCMP, to be chaired by Mr. David Brown. In addition to the appointment of
Mr. Brown as Chair, Linda Black, Richard Drouin, Norman Inkster, and Larry Murray — each with varied
expertise and experience — have been appointed as members of the Task Force. The Task Force will make
recommendations to improve management and accountability within the RCMP, and will report back to
the Government by the end of 2007.
Furthermore, the appointment of William J.S. Elliott as the new Commissioner of the RCMP, with a career
that has been marked with distinction as well as expertise in the area of national security, will provide the
RCMP with the renewed leadership that it critically needs at this time.
With respect to the criminal allegations under the Tenant Protection Act, 1997 mentioned in your letter,
please note that criminal matters in Ontario fall within the purview of the Honourable Michael Bryant,
Attorney General of Ontario. You may therefore wish to raise your concerns with his office, using the
contact information provided below:
Ministry of the Attorney General

McMurtry-Scott Building
720 Bay Street, 11th Floor
Toronto, Ontario M5G 2K1
Telephone: 416-326-2220
-3-
With respect to your concerns about the application of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms, I
have taken the liberty of forwarding a copy of your correspondence to my colleague the Honourable Rob
Nicholson, Minister of Justice and Attorney General of Canada, for his information and consideration. In
addition, a copy of your correspondence has been forwarded to Ms. Mary Elizabeth Dawson, Conflict of
Interest and Ethics Commissioner.
I regret that I cannot help in the way you had perhaps hoped, but wish you well in resolving your concerns.
Yours sincerely,
c.c.: The Honourable Rob Nicholson, P.C., Q.C., M.P.
Minister of Justice and Attorney General of Canada
Ms. Mary Elizabeth Dawson, Q.C.
Conflict of Interest and Ethics Commissioner
Stockwell Day, P.C., M.P. Minister of Public Safety
I am well aware of the Federal Accountability Act,2006 and in fact have written the
Prime Minister Stephen Harper, providing him with evidence which his office responded
hoping I understand why his office can not get involved.
I do not understand why his office can not get involved unless of course his office
is involved with the conspiracy which clearly the evidence shows must be by not
getting involved.
114
A copy of his Office’s e-mail can be found in the Government Correspondence compiled
September 1 2007 which is referenced in the afore said Preamble Federal
correspondence Recap October 9 2007 document
The afore mentioned document clearly shows: the Honourable Rob Nicholson, P.C., Q.C., M.P. Minister
of Justice and Attorney General of Canada has been informed along with everyone else who I have
mentioned and clearly nothing has been done to address these most serious issues.
You yourself Stockwell Day, P.C., M.P. Minister of Public Safety are aware that The Honourable Rob
Nicholson, P.C., Q.C., M.P. Minister of Justice and Attorney General of Canada has been informed as you
clearly state in your response to me dated November 2 2007 and a copy is hereto copied immediately
above with the date incorrectly noted OCT 2 g 2007
Clearly the DOJ is implicated in this conspiracy as well as the RCMP Pension Fund scandal which the
Standing Committee of Public Accounts was ordered to sit on.
You have also Cc Ms. Mary Elizabeth Dawson, Q.C. Conflict of Interest and Ethics Commissioner and the
records show I have already been there, done that but her Office had no authority to deal with the issues.
Your letter of November 2 2007 confirms everything I state that you people do nothing other than a dog
chasing its tail which certainly appears busy and attentive to something but if it weren’t for the
coincidental consistent movement of head and tail its head would be found stuffed firmly up its ass.
The evidence is clear that the Task Force on Governance and Cultural Change in the RCMP, to be chaired
by Mr. David Brown. In addition to the appointment of Mr. Brown as Chair, Linda Black, Richard Drouin,
Norman Inkster, and Larry Murray will accomplish absolutely nothing other than to appear as if they are
benefiting the public as is the Fiction of the Attorney General which does nothing but provide members of
the Law Society with luxurious benefit to the colossal waste of tax payers money.
The accountability and responsibility has already been defined in the “Roles and Responsibilities of the
Attorney General” on the Ontario Attorney General web site and common law and common sense
demands the guarantor of the guarantee to the individual’s Charter Rights and Freedoms as provided in the
Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms is the responsible and accountable party to back the guarantee
which is the Federal Government and clearly The Honourable Rob Nicholson, P.C., Q.C., M.P. Minister of
Justice and Attorney General of Canada is mandated with that obligation.
If not he, then who?
That seems to be the gazzilion $ question.

“The Government is committed to a high standard of transparency and accountability
and is taking action to ensure government business is conducted in a responsible
manner.”
BULLSHIT
To cite a man of wisdom from 2500 years ago ….Confucius says

“There were no dates in this history, but scrawled this way and that across every
page were the words BENEVOLENCE, RIGHTEOUSNESS and MORALITY….finally I began to make
out what was written between the lines; the whole volume was filled with a single
phrase: EAT PEOPLE”
115
Mr. Stockwell Day, P.C., M.P. Minister of Public Safety
On this 3rd day of November 2007 under the authority of the Constitution Act, 1982 (Document) with due
regard to Part 1, Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms charge you to uphold your responsibility to
which you will be held accountable by the people.
“As Minister of Public Safety I am accountable to both Parliament and the public for the RCMP and must
rights and freedoms of Canadians.”
The RCMP have been provided the evidence as have you and all the people whose e-mail addresses I have
provided and I insist on behalf of the people that you commence or cause to commence proceedings for
the restructuring of the antiquated legal system that has been superseded by the 1982 enactment of the
Constitution which demands a modus operandi consistent with and conducive to the guarantee of the
Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms.
Common sense and all that’s sane demands government personnel be irreproachable in this endeavor FFF,
Forthright, Forthcoming, Forthwith and I will tentatively presume you are the man for this most significant
job in this moment of time in history where it is absolutely vital to the well being and safety of the people
of Canada
As Minister of Public Safety Mr. Stockwell Day, P.C., M.P. it is incumbent upon you to lead the way in
the interests of each and every person in Canada who is individually guaranteed Rights as provided by the
Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedom and you must do so with integrity, fortitude and conviction FFF
attentive to, consistent with and conducive to the guarantee to each and every individual of Canada as per
the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms.
The present legal system is extraordinarily incompetent to that endeavor to the humongous waste of tax
dollars to the horrific detriment to the people of Canada who finance the system for their benefit of a moral
society under the supremacy of God.
It matters not if you believe God exists or ever did for when you have exercised your responsibilities under
the supremacy of God we will all be believers as the spirit of God and the spirit of The Law is one and the
same.
I reiterate a continuity of the befuddlement will not be tolerated giving due cause to commence
proceedings against every individual of the present government personnel who has been granted authority
under the Constitution to administer and enforce it consistent with and conducive to the Canadian Charter
of Rights and Freedom consistent with the aspirations attributed to God clearly defined in

subject only to such reasonable limits prescribed by law as can be demonstrably justified in a free
and democratic society.
2.
Every
one
has
116
the
follo
wing
funda
ment
al
freed
oms:
(a)
freed
om of
consc
ience
and
religi
on;
(b)
freed
om of
thoug
ht,
belief
,
opini
on
and
expre
ssion,
inclu
ding
freed
om of
the
press
and
other
medi
a of
comm
unica
tion;
(c)
freed
om of
peace
ful
asse
mbly;
and
(d)
117
freed
om of
assoc
iation
.
7. Everyone has the right to life, liberty and security of the person and the right not to be deprived
thereof except in accordance with the principles of fundamental justice.
and equal benefit of the law without discrimination and, in particular, without discrimination based on
race, national or ethnic origin, colour, religion, sex, age or mental or physical disability.
inconsistent with the provisions of the Constitution is, to the extent of the inconsistency, of
no force or effect.
Whatever the cost to the taxpayer to this endeavor will be money most well spent.
I remind you attentiveness to efficiency and effect is demanded as per
7. Everyone has the right to life, liberty and security of the person and the right not to be
deprived thereof except in accordance with the principles of fundamental justice.
The public have been deprived for far too long and it to this endeavor I do not see the benefit to
dwelling on the past which the legal system has a firm grip on which has been long stretched and an
immediate release will propel us far into the future.
I have been FFF and I would expect and respect to be responded to in kind.
Frank Gallagher
Frank Gallagher
PS
Your immediate attention is required
Are you the man for this most significant challenge?
Answer would be most gratefully appreciated
118
Stockwell Day oomerang emocracy esolve Frank Gallagher
Politician Citizen
Men’s natures are alike; it is their habits that carry them far apart
Politician’s perspective Citizen’s
perspective
How difficult to find the words to once and for
ever make the people understand our plight to Long ago the government took our guns
keep the avarice sated while satiating the peon promising to protect us while we endeavored to
providers with carrots of dreams potentially earn and stake out our perception of heaven.
possible but impossible due the likes of us.
The Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms is
The ignorant people endeavoring to live a but words on paper written by people who
simple life have no idea how complicated it is traditionally
for us to ensure they remain simple to pen their way to our heaven leaving us believing
appreciate the simple life whilst we publicly our Day will come
argue over the rights to their elusive dreams
without waking them. Well Mr. Day is here and he takes us softly into
the night
Nobody knows the troubles I have seen
keeping them peacefully happy bordering Some day our Knight will come.
poverty whilst we must consistently seek out
fair ways to divvy up the true worth of their Belief is the elusive dream that would be if not
efforts. for the Charlatan’s of State and Church whose
habits we feed
He who is sincere hits what is right, and apprehends without the exercise of thought
Learning without thought is labor lost, learning without thought is perilous
Today centuries of knowledge is available at our finger tips, yet without consistent
attentiveness to genuine purpose attentive to reality it will persistently be that which
separates us from the Ideal.
119
He who is known as an early riser can sleep to noon
He who sleeps to noon will be left with naught, but a can of worms
Words are the weapons of politicians which they manipulate to manipulate the people
How sad people with brains capable of unfathomable, most magnificent accomplishments
far beyond that which could possibly be imagined of the capabilities and aspirations of God
due their ignorance and persistence to it, which attentiveness to tradition born of ignorance
of the times serves to lengthen the chain of time between Ideals being variables of the
intelligence or ignorance as you prefer, of the minds of times.
It has been 2500 years since Confucius walked the earth with his words of wisdom and
2000 years since Jesus taught us the spirit and his conviction to it and approximately 515
years since Christopher Columbus proved the world was round.
We know the words of Confucius and Jesus to be true and perhaps we would believe the
world was flat today if it wasn’t for Mr. Columbus doing more than just talking in circles
lifting his ass off where upon it was sitting and put it where it needed to be to prove the
reality that was considered fiction by the most wisest of the ignorant who lived in 1492.
I wish I had been there to witness the force of gravity that day as the face of arrogant
ignorant wisdom was realized, falling swiftly to assert their due place in history.
History is the ignorance of times, not to be grasped firmly in retention but to retain in
progressive assent to the Ideal of present wisdom which are all but variables in time where
duration a variable of reluctance to let go the past.
The wisest person who sits on his ass will starve to death when the ignorant become wise to
them
He who keeps danger in mind will rest safely in his seat; he who keeps ruin in
mind will preserve his interest secure; he who sets the dangers of disorder
before himself will maintain a state of order
He offering words of wisdom in offset of irrefutable wisdom best be successful lest he be

offset, as a reliable source of wisdom.
Good day Mr. Day….I hope you have attentively put your mind to the facts and absorbed
well the issues I have presented you and quite frankly I hope stored in the capacity your
name suggests Mr. Stockwell.
Knowledge is that which we know to be true however when not used true to purpose defines one’s true
purpose
120
Reality is the truth impervious to perception however reality is precisely due to perception left unattended.
Ignorance is simply absence of knowledge inherent to us all which persistently reminds, keeping us simple
in ignorant ways on refusal to acknowledge and attentively address it
Have you ever wished you had of said this rather than that and had perhaps a chance to do it all over again.
I see no reason why it need be a wish and given the significance of the issues I have been attempting to
communicate it would be negligent of me not to make every effort to convey that which I know to be true
to the person I believe is responsible to deal with the issues and it is to that endeavor I take you at your
word until you prove different.
To make my intent clearly transparent and unambiguous I am writing you to inform you that under normal
circumstance I have chanced upon evidence that irrefutably proves the governments of Canada and Ontario
have conspired against the people creating a two tiered system as a pathetically noticeable byproduct of
their modus operandi which they themselves have documented and I present for all to see on my web sites.
I do not yet have irrefutable proof as to your involvement other than by association and your prominent
position in the system which has been well documented by the personnel of the system, oh and of course
your response to my e-mail of July 19 2007 you affirm you received and responded to 3 ½ months later on
November 2 2007 incorrectly dated OCT 2 g 2007 a copy of which immediately follows.
At this point you could very well be just one of their puppets intelligent in their ways but ignorant as to
their true purpose which everything in reality attests to.
One concentrating on the betterment of their career is apt to focus on that which will get them there rather
than focusing on the true purpose of playing an important role in the government structure which is
financed by the people who understand the necessity of all paying their fair share towards the developing
and maintenance of a moral society as defined by the supreme law of Canada, the Constitution Act, 1982
which with the inclusion of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms clearly states whereas Canada is
founded upon principles that recognize the supremacy of God and the rule of law
I shall do my best not to reiterate upon reiterations I have reiterated so many times before but I will inform
you once again where these reiterations are to be found along with all the evidence which supports all that
I state to be irrefutably true.
On this site is listed 9 other sites which combined hold the truth that need be gleaned to respond to my
most worthy concerns of Public Safety which you Hon. Stockwell Day are the Minister of and remain
tentatively Honourable in my unique perception..
Your words in your response to my e-mail to you July 19 2007 which said response was e-mailed to me
November 2 2007 but bares the date OCT 2 g 2007 which I immediately responded back to on November
3 2007 indicates a person to be possessed of the knowledge to deal with the issues, however when actually
placed side by side with the letter you are responding to provides many truths not relative to that which I
121
seeked which is of course the purpose of all my writings to get more than just words which are inane to the
purpose as would the world still be flat if not for Chris getting off his ass to prove the words true which he
spoke.
So, attentive to the fact humans err and do everything imaginable and unimaginable I address the verbatim
of your e-mail response to my July 19 2007 which you refer to.
It’s is in this way we can communicate and have a meeting of the minds, not only yours and mine but
whomever reads and follows up in the spirit of The Law ( Constitution document) which all laws and those
people granted authority under must be consistent with and conducive to the individual’s guaranteed
Charter Rights and Freedoms which are consistent with the aspirations attributed to God who the supreme
law of Canada recognizes as supreme.
Given the most magnificent importance of the Canadian Constitution which governs everyone and
everything they do it is perquisite the government personnel who are financed to uphold The Law and have
sworn to do before God who is supreme be irreproachable to that endeavor for it is the promise and
guarantee of the Charter which ultimately protects and benefits each and every individual of Canada in this
sanctuary of the spirit of God.
Integrity, FFF to purpose is not an option to assure that which is humanly possible to protect the people
consistently consistent with the guarantee which is ultimately the responsibility of each and every
individual granted authority under the Constitution to administer and enforce it consistent with the
provisions found therein which must be interpreted in the spirit of The Law under the supremacy of God.
The spirit of God is clear as direct from Jesus which is least likely to be mistaken by humankind.
Do Unto Others As You Would Have Them Do Unto You
It is in this spirit I write to you which will be the test as to the spirit you respond to me
Perhaps there will be some ambiguity presented from both sides along the way and given the significance
of the issues it is you Hon. Stockwell Day I address, to all your capacities of government authority along
with your capacities as an individual being one and the same with every other individual guaranteed
Charter Rights and Freedoms subject to and limited only to compliance with The Law consistent with and
conducive to the Charter.
It is you personally who I expect to respond to me given the most significant issues regarding Public
Safety and I do not consider a response from your janitor or anyone else of your staff to be competent to
your personal perception, however you are responsible for your assigns but it is impossible for the meeting
of our minds if you abstain.
As they say, first meetings have great influence on the perception of others and your first letter leaves me
wanting.
I remind you I have a prodigious amount of evidence that you must surely be aware of that provides me the
opportunity to discern when deviations from the purpose are being initiated and it is your competence to
assess the evidence I am addressing and testing for all to see.
I will presume that you are in concurrence with me in any issue you fail to address, and you standby and
hold to be true as within your knowledge to be true FFF.
122
My endeavor is to assure you are fully cognizant to and coherent to all the evidence I have presented and
where you may perceive to be some doubt as to that which I state to be true and backed by fact it is your
responsibility to address the issues of your perceptive doubt so that I may direct you to the evidence which
will remove any doubt as to your intention to befuddle perceptions.
If you have any doubt at all as to that which I state to be irrefutably true, it is your responsibility to table
the evidence in support of your doubt and of course I will remain consistent, true to purpose which must be
yours in the prominent position of authority you hold, granted under the auspices of The Law.
I have already responded to your response to me which is attached below on November 3 2007 and it is the
intent of this letter to inform you that a response by you personally with great effort to integrity FFF will
be expected as required of a person in your prominent position in the administering and enforcing of The
Law of our country consistent with the authority granted you consistent with the spirit of The Law and
God who is recognized supreme
I ask you to explain to me, clearly how any of the verbiage in your response which you so proudly signed
to address the issues which I presented to you.
Every word you have had written and signed proves your consistency to the fiction of the Attorney General
described in the Do you part. doc I sent you on November 3 2007 which contains a black bar like the one
below which you may click on to refresh you memory.
http://books.google.com/books?
I remind you due to circumstances beyond your control and obviously everyone’s, any further response in
support of the Fiction perpetrated by the Office of the Department of Justice and the Attorney General of
Canada is superfluous for Fiction runs rampant and my files are abundantly saturated with it, all irrelevant
to the issues front and center dealing with the criminal acts perpetrated firstly by my former tenant in a
public building financed to administer and enforce justice in accordance with The Law , the Constitution
Act, 1982 and the obstructions of justice perpetrated by the person’s identified in the 15 Lawyer Files
which can be found on my web site: Law Society of Lower Tier Canada
http://groups.google.com/group/peoples-law-society where you will see listed all the pertinent evidence
which Sgt. Steinebech of the RCMP confirmed he had available to him which they, the RCMP had filed
from my e-mails to Sgt. Michael Thomson.
Sgt. Steinebech also confirmed they have a copy of the Tribunal Hearing recording dated June 30 2005
which they have had for near two years now which was witnessed by my mother, demonstrating no
resemblance to that which you have written.
However what you have written reflects stunning resemblance to the fiction of the Attorney General to be
found by clicking on the aforesaid black bar, and the wisdom of Confucius 2500 years ago which bodes
well with the acceptance of the Attorney General of Ontario to respect the Roles and Responsibilities of
the Attorney General .
to guard the unscrupulous ways of the tradition of his Office with no respect to the Constitution which is
ultimately his responsibility.
There were no words in this history but scrawled this way and that across every page were the words
BENEVOLENCE, RIGHTEOUSNESS and MORALITY….finally I began to make out what was written
between the lines; the whole volume was filled with a single page: EAT PEOPLE
123
Ultimately the Minister of Justice and the Attorney General of Canada, Rob Nicholson who you copied
your response to me to is informed of the issues I have addressed to you and I appreciate your efforts to
this endeavor.
I make note that you refer to Rob as someone referred to the new Commissioner of the RCMP as Bill
drawing some attention as that which is most obvious that he and all upper echelon of any government
department, agency or whatever are receptive to the conspiracy and the RCMP pension fund scandal also
was linked to the DOJ.
Now he either acts responsibly with due regard to The Law which authorized his mandate or he is in
neglect of his responsibility leaving the Public Safety of the people unprotected as demanded by the
guarantees to the individual as provided in the Charter.
“As Minister of Public Safety I am accountable to both Parliament and the public for the RCMP and
must ensure that the Force functions with full respect for Canada’s democratic traditions and the
fundamental rights and freedoms of Canadians.”
Clearly Canada’s democratic traditions have been precluded by the Canadian Charter of Rights and
Freedoms where The Law recognizes the supremacy of God and the Law Society of Upper Canada
adamantly states their members do not give a damn about the individual’s Charter Rights and went on to
prove it in their correspondence dealing with a matter I brought before them to address.
So you Minister of Public Safety Stockwell Day, P.C., M.P. have clearly acknowledged your responsibility
and accountability to the people in matters of the functions of the RCMP as above and below
“As Minister of Public Safety I am accountable to both Parliament and the public for the RCMP and
must ensure that the Force functions with full respect for Canada’s democratic traditions and the
fundamental rights and freedoms of Canadians.”
This has been like pulling teeth as documented number (1) which heads the list of the documents I
presentd to the RCMP on October 18 2007 which Sgt. Steinebech affirmed the RCMP already had on file.
Once again I refer you to that which I previously stated which can be found on my web site: Law
Society of Lower Tier Canada http://groups.google.com/group/peoples-law-society where you will
see listed all the pertinent evidence which Sgt. Steinebech of the RCMP confirmed he had available to him
which they, the RCMP had filed from my e-mails to Sgt. Michael Thomson.
I have no doubt your belated apology in your delayed response of November 2 2007 3 ½ months after my
e-mail of July 19 2007 you refer to in your response, copy attached following my commentary was
necessitated because you never intended to respond until the 41 page document (1) To: Randy Craig Det
Sergeant OPP Anti-Rackets Preamble Federal correspondence Recap October 9 2007.doc Oct. 9,
2007 which is to be found on my web site aforesaid immediately above.
Your admittance as to your responsibility and accountability is gratefully appreciated and all that remains
is for you to do your job in bringing the people to justice who have deprived me of my guaranteed Charter
Rights and Freedoms.
I remind you my documents are spread much further than you are aware of and it would be wise to deal
with the issues FFF in accordance with the Constitution with due regard to the individual’s guaranteed
Charter Rights.
124
Surely things can be dealt with more reasonably than they are dealing with it in Pakistan.
Quite a challenge for you people of the government but we the people have been satiated with the Reality
you have bestowed upon us in your years of unscrupulous disrespect for the people who have paid your
way.
The Lord surely works in mysterious ways!!!

to those who refuse to understand Him.
Right?
Far from respect
Frank Gallagher
Frank Gallagher
PS
Amen
125
Ministre de a Sécurité publique
OCT 2 g 2007
Mr. Frank Gallagher

frank.gaIIaghersympatico.ca
Dear Mr. Gallagher:
Thank you for your correspondence of July 19, 2007, regarding the Royal Canadian Mounted Police
(RCMP) pension fund as well as your concerns that rights under the Canadian Charter of Rights and
Freedoms are not being protected. I apologize for the delay in responding.
As Minister of Public Safety I am accountable to both Parliament and the public for the RCMP and must
rights and freedoms of Canadians.
The Government is committed to a high standard of transparency and accountability and is taking action to
ensure government business is conducted in a responsible manner. In order to deliver on its commitment to
make Government more accountable, on April 11, 2006, Canada’s new Government introduced the
Federal Accountability Act, which received Royal Assent on December 12, 2006. Through this Act, the
Government of Canada has introduced specific measures to help strengthen accountability and increase
transparency and oversight in Government operations. To clarify roles and responsibilities, the Federal
Accountability Act designates Deputy Ministers and Deputy Heads such as the Commissioner of the
RCMP as accounting officers who are accountable before the appropriate committee of Parliament to
answer questions related to their responsibilities.
Canada
-2-
The RCMP is an important national institution that plays a significant role in the safety and security of
Canadians; ensuring public trust and confidence is an important component of achieving that role.
Canada’s new Government has taken a number of recent steps in respect of this important national
institution.
On April 13, 2007, Mr. David Brown was appointed to lead an independent investigation into allegations
relating to the RCMP pension and insurance plans. The mandate for this investigation gave Mr. Brown the
flexibility to recommend whether a more formal inquiry was necessary to address any outstanding
questions. In his report, submitted to the Government on June 15, 2007, Mr. Brown recommended that no
formal inquiry was necessary. I have closely reviewed Mr. Brown’s report and have accepted all of his
recommendations.
On July 16, 2007, the Government announced the creation of a five-member Task Force on Governance
and Cultural Change in the RCMP, to be chaired by Mr. David Brown. In addition to the appointment of
Mr. Brown as Chair, Linda Black, Richard Drouin, Norman Inkster, and Larry Murray — each with varied
expertise and experience — have been appointed as members of the Task Force. The Task Force will make
recommendations to improve management and accountability within the RCMP, and will report back to
the Government by the end of 2007.
126
Furthermore, the appointment of William J.S. Elliott as the new Commissioner of the RCMP, with a career
that has been marked with distinction as well as expertise in the area of national security, will provide the
RCMP with the renewed leadership that it critically needs at this time.
With respect to the criminal allegations under the Tenant Protection Act, 1997 mentioned in your letter,
please note that criminal matters in Ontario fall within the purview of the Honourable Michael Bryant,
Attorney General of Ontario. You may therefore wish to raise your concerns with his office, using the
contact information provided below:
Ministry of the Attorney General
McMurtry-Scott Building
720 Bay Street, 11th Floor
Toronto, Ontario M5G 2K1
Telephone: 416-326-2220
-3-
With respect to your concerns about the application of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms, I
have taken the liberty of forwarding a copy of your correspondence to my colleague the Honourable Rob
Nicholson, Minister of Justice and Attorney General of Canada, for his information and consideration. In
addition, a copy of your correspondence has been forwarded to Ms. Mary Elizabeth Dawson, Conflict of
Interest and Ethics Commissioner.
I regret that I cannot help in the way you had perhaps hoped, but wish you well in resolving your concerns.
Yours sincerely,
c.c.: The Honourable Rob Nicholson, P.C., Q.C., M.P.
Minister of Justice and Attorney General of Canada
Ms. Mary Elizabeth Dawson, Q.C.
Conflict of Interest and Ethics Commissioner
Stockwell Day, P.C., M.P. Minister of Public Safety
127
This way up This way down
There were no dates in this history but scrawled this

Do not do to others what you would not way and that were the words BENEVOLENCE,
do to yourself RIGHTEOUSNESS and MORALITY…finally I
Recompense injury with justice and began to make out what was written between the
recompense kindness with kindness lines; the whole volume was filled with a single
phrase:
The lord helps EAT PEOPLE
those who help
themselves
Heaven is to die for but there is a better way
The Constitution is the tool but in the hands of fools
The deceitful Mind Is betrayed by the Body

Reality is the truth impervious to perception yet reality is precisely due to perception
A Constitution not enforced is as superfluous as a brain not used

The Proof of the Truth of the Government Corruption and

Conspiracy has been published on my webs site for all to see
including Commissioner William Elliot of the RCMP
128
I have filed a complaint with the “Commission For Public Complaints Against The
RCMP” for refusing to investigate Government corruption and conspiracy and
under the RCMP Act the Commissioner was required to acknowledge receipt of
the complaint by Christmas Day at the latest. The Commissioner was suspected to
be in on the conspiracy and his failure to comply with the Act has seriously
implicated him whereas a Public Inquiry is the only sane recourse to resolve the
issues. I have attached the pertinent evidence.
December 27 2007
Fax 604-501-4095

Frank Gallagher
Manager, CST RET.
Dear Andree Leduc
In response to your letter of December 20 2007 (copy attached) I thank you for admitting your
incompetence and lack of authority to deal with the issues of Government corruption and conspiracy
which are of a pressing concern to me and in my opinion should be a pressing concern to you but
obviously you are oblivious to that reality, understandable however because I have a firm grasp of it.
You have stressed once again, that the purpose of the Commission is to provide the public with an
opportunity to make complaints concerning the conduct of the members of the RCMP in the
performance of their duties.
I understand you have neither the expertise nor the legal authority to permit you to become involved
in issues beyond the scope of this mandate.
It is important to note that I am alert to the narrow minds of government personnel and your limited
respect for the individuals of the moral majority not in the employ of the government services and
your persistence to insult our intelligence.
Let me put emphasis on the fact that I thank you as a citizen of Canada being an individual of the
public, for the opportunity to make a complaint concerning the conduct of the members of the RCMP
in the performance of their duties and in fact, as you are aware I have taken advantage of your
generosity, however I must also emphasize I am a taxpayer and I suggest you keep that in mind
should you care to continue in your endeavors.
129
Your admittance, and though appreciative of your integrity, is discerning that you are incompetent but
admittance is the first step to the cure.
Integrity is an exceptionally wonderful trait rare in the employ of the government and we can not
afford to lose you.
If it would give you any satisfaction I am incompetent too having no experience in dealing with a
government conspiracy when I began back on June 30 2005 even though I was aware of persistent
government corruption and conspiracy as we all are I never had substantial evidence of it, but with
confidence in my integrity and ability to think things out I set out to prove it and now confident that I
have a voluminous, and I thank you for that word because I have been stuck with “ a preponderance”
and “ a prodigious” which I thanked Karen Noakes #440 of the York Regional Police” for, to describe
the amount of irrefutable evidence I have supplied to a voluminous number of government personnel
who have refused to deal with the issues published on my web site implicating them in the
conspiracy.
At this moment I will accept the fact you are incompetent which you have admitted and demonstrated
and will offer you some suggestions with the endeavor to keep you out of trouble and more useful to
the Canadian people.
I have filed a complaint against two members of the RCMP for failing to investigate government
conspiracy as you are aware and have acknowledged in your letter of November 8 2007 (copy
attached)
There is little needed to investigate the complaint for all that is required to do is ask the officers
involved and they will confirm it.
On my complaint I identified my mother as witnessing the refusal by Sergeant Roy Steinebach on

October 18 2007 so I doubt there will be any denying of that which I complained about. Too simple
so far right?
What the issue will be is whether or not the RCMP had the right to refuse to investigate the evidence
which they may if it is considered trivial, frivolous, or vexatious.
I believe the complaint itself is evident that it is not trivial, Right?
Is it frivolous or vexatious?
You don’t know right?
That is why I have been forwarding the evidence to you in advance so as to provide you the
opportunity to familiarize yourself with it and to get your mind thinking in appropriate manner due
the serious nature of the issues..
Your admittance of your incompetence and inexperience to that endeavor is discerning I reiterate but
never the less you will be called upon to make that very important decision.
At some point a public hearing will be in order and it would be prudent for the Chair to assign a
130
competent panel to the task and to that endeavor I heartedly suggest you study the evidence published
on my web site.
With due regard to your present ineptness I advise that attentiveness to the issues in the document
Law Society of Upper Canada Part 1 Part 2 will suffice to determine whether or not the members of
the RCMP who I have complained about are negligent in performance of their duties.
I have presumed you people are not members of the legal profession and that is precisely what is
required of a jury in this instance not being biased, well perhaps that is not entirely correct, however
all that is required is a sane mind of integrity although one or the other is in question due your letter
to me but it will all become clear as we proceed.
You will find that Law Society document at the top of the page on my web site
I remind you there will be no authority provided by the government conspirators to any person, or
government department or agency to take them out and likewise there will be no cooperation from
anyone under the influence of the conspiracy and in fact when they become aware of this document
will attempt to interfere with you in performance of your duty and I suspect they will be very
convincing as they continue to obstruct justice. Perhaps you have already consulted with them.
I dare say they will be successful in their initiative but at that time if you were to take the news to the
media you will be assured a prominent spot in the hearts of the moral majority and you will play a
major role in the restructuring of the system consistent with and conducive to the support of the
Charter guarantee.
Adversely the consequences are unpredictable though will certainly be detrimental to some
significant degree of your concern.
Take a few moments if needed to reason that out and then keep it firmly and prominent in mind.
Given the serious nature of the issues and our inexperience at dealing with such issues it is of the
utmost importance to get the evidence into experienced hands and most importantly responsible
hands which is an improbability due the fact the entire legal system is corrupt and involved in the
conspiracy, which at the moment I am giving you the benefit of the doubt due to the lack of
irrefutable evidence.
To that endeavor I expect full cooperation immediately consistent with your mandate, which must be
consistent with the Constitution.
I must advise that all correspondence with you will be published on my web site and failure to
respond to me in a timely manner will alter your status implicating you in the conspiracy.
The ultimate goal is obviously a Public Inquiry and I do expect full cooperation to that initiative
where it is the only viable option relative to the circumstances.
The Law Society document requires no professional experience to assess as to whether or not it
makes sense for members of the Law Society of Upper Canada to administer and enforce the law
131
consistent with and conducive to the supreme law of Canada, the Constitution Act, 1982 which
includes the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms which guarantees every individual equality in
protection and benefit in all matters before and under the law.
I suggest you make particular note of that.
Throughout my documents published on the web I have copied excerpts from the Charter but for your
convenience I provide you this.
I should mention that I am 65 years old and do not intend to spend the rest of my life tending to a
simple matter of bringing down the government conspiracy and I expect you to respect my concerns.
I must say I was quite surprised, impressed and appreciative as to how quickly you processed my
original complaint to the RCMP.
Back to the matter on hand, the Law Society document, after reading you will be coherent to the fact
it is an improbability that members of the Law Society of Upper Canada who are required to
administer justice in accordance with the Constitution can do so when they are not required to give a
damn about the individuals guaranteed Charter rights which seriously compromises the guarantee,
wouldn’t you think?
Once you are cognizant to the facts study Lawyer Files # 1-3 found near the bottom of web site
http://groups.google.com/group/peoples-law-society which should convince you of the government
conspiracy and the need for a Public Inquiry.
So with expedience in mind with foresight, benefit of evidence they will continue in their reluctance
to investigate and being in receipt of their inane verbiage I will forward you a request for a review
and you may at that time ask the RCMP to conduct a further investigation of my complaint attentive
to the issues regarding the Law Society of Upper Canada Part 1 Part 2 document and Lawyer Files #
1-3 regarding obstruction of justice in a criminal fraud committed in front of a judicator in a public
building financed to administer justice consistent with the guaranteed Charter rights.
Their response to that will be most interesting and I presume there are provisions in the RCMP Act
for a timely response.
At this time, presuming they will not investigate the government conspiracy in its entirety, a public
hearing will be in order leading to a Public Inquiry which is imminent whether or not you cooperate.
Your cooperation is inevitable sooner or later and I needn’t expand on the benefits of sooner.
Should you need any assistance you will find me most cooperative to reasonable request.
I thank you in advance and hope I have made my intentions and that which is required of you
absolutely clear.
Due to your present status of incompetence I will not burden you with further documents presently
over your heads.
We will eventually get around to them one way or another.
Frank Gallagher
132
PS
I am an individual of Canada and I expect equal service and benefit of your office and demand you do
not delete any further e-mails I send you which will be and are your responsibility under your
mandate.
I remind you I have done nothing but act responsibly and it is you who are wanting, necessitating me
to attend to the matter.
To that endeavor I will expect an immediate acknowledgement of receipt as a reply

e-mail with contents of my request attached.
On receipt I will expect acknowledgement by e-mail with your assurance you will cooperate in a
manner consistent with and conducive to every individual’s guaranteed Charter rights and in
particular mine in efficient and effective manner with due regard to the rights of the tax payers.
These are most serious matters regarding the safety and well being of every individual in Canada and
must be dealt with due regard..
My web site and the public await your response which is of pressing concern to me and you if you are
coherent and susceptible to reason.
We will see.
It is absolutely ridiculous to use Canada Post which serves only to delay.
I am publishing everything on the web so there is no concern about privacy and confidentiality and it
would be an initiative showing your ability to think things out logically rather than stick to inane
policy due the circumstance where policy will not allow you to take affirmative action against
government corruption, conspiracy and Organized Crime as you will know when you study the
evidence.
I reiterate that you must study it to determine if it is trivia, frivolous or vexatious which it is
obviously not for the evidence is signed by government personnel and staff of the Law Society of
Upper Canada.
It’s all real, and yes you are involved with exposing it or attempting to cover it up because it most
definitely will get to a PUBLIC INQUIRY and so will you one way or another.
The consequences are your choice.
133
How would one
know when it was
received by the
Commissioner? I’ll
presume
November 16 2007
as per page 8
134
November 16 2007
How would one know a Friday so 3 days to
when it was actually deliver not counting
received? Saturday and
Did it sit on someone’s Sunday.
desk for a while or is it
acknowledged as it
comes in?
Obviously not the Commissioner nor is

the letter head the Commissioner’s.
I will tentatively presume this to be

standard procedure making the report
due 30 days from November 16 2007
being December 16 2007 allowing 5
days mail delivery December 21 2007
135
Received by mail
Dec.23 2007
December 31 2007 Resent by e-mail
Andree Leduc
Complaints Against RCMP
Please see attachment “Commission RCMP

Complaints Dec. 27 2007” and immediate response
required
January 2 2008 Out with the old….In with the new.
Andree
Having not received acknowledgement of receipt of e-mail I am now forced to send by fax at
undue cost to me due your failure to cooperate in a manner conducive to the well being of
individual’s guaranteed Charter rights which are not being supported by government personnel,
severely compromising their safety and in direct defiance of the law and indifference to the
people who finance your services
Immediate response required …….Get up to speed……..Formal complaint coming soon

Frank Gallagher
136
137
The Stockwell Day letter pages 27 and 28
demonstrates the divertive manner the government
conspirators adopt when pressure is on them further
demonstrtd by the Federal Accountability Act,2006.
A Public Inquiry into the RCMP Pension Fund scandal
which revealed the improprieties of the upper command
linked to the DOJ was diverted to a Task Force which
Stockwell confirmed was the best way to go which
served to cover up the conspiracy. The task Force has
provided their report to the RCMP which I have not
seen
That is evidence which should show no mention of a
diligent investigation into the DOJ link to the RCMP
Pension Fund and no punishment dealt out to
the upper command implicated in the conspiracy
irrefutably making my point justice is an improbability
under the present administration.where their endeavour
is to stick together to ransack the people and when they
are caught they simply orchestrate their way out of it. A
PUBLIC INQUIRYwas warranted then and a PUBLIC
INQUIRY is warranted now where I reiterate the Task
Force report is evidence of their persistence to
conspiracy and deceit.
The evidence is voluminous an investigation is

necessary and the RCMP Commissioner has
implicated himself in the conspiracy demonstrated
by his refusal to cooperate and comply with RCMP
ACT being 18 approximately 18 days overdue of
providing a status report within 30 days of
acknowledging receipt of the complaint.
The facts are clear and simple as is the necessity of

a Public Inquiry with the ultimate objective to clean
up the government conspiracy and organized crime
intent on ransacking the moral majority to the
benefit of the members of the legal profession to the
astronomical detriment of the moral majority.
The legal system must be radically restructured to
ensure consistency with the Constitution conducive
to the individual’s guaranteed Charter rights.
I hereby request a review of the evidence with the intent to expedite to a Public Inquiry with due regard to
inconsistent with the provisions of the Constitution is, to the extent of the inconsistency, of no
force or effect. Your duty as per your mandate is abundantly clear as is the evidence and due the
circumstances a PUBLIC Inquiry is the only option. Should the conspirators attempt to interfere as they are
wont to do you must get the information to the people via the media Frank Gallagher
138
The public hearing as is within your
mandate need not be lengthy if the
public hearing is well publicized
which you must be attentive to that
endeavor and it is now time for the
media to fulfill their responsibility to
the people.
Any attempt to delay the public

hearing or elongate it will be seen as
being orchestrated by the conspirators
and another venture into superfluity.
The circumstance does not warrant heading

to this eventuality where a PUBLIC
INQUIRY is demanded and
recommendations to the RCMP and Public
Safety is not an option where the Minister of
Public Safety, the RCMP Commissioner the
Minister of Justice and Attorney General are
guilty of conspiracy if not treason and must
stand trial before the people.
Hardly would they heed a recommendation

to severely punishment themselves.
I reiterate a PUBLIC INQUIRY is the only valid

and reasonable approach due the circumstance
and very serious nature of the issues.
Frank Gallagher
See page 42 which provides for an immediate
public hearing providing a direct route to the
inevitable PUBLIC INQUIRY
This document “ RCMP COMPLAINT January 4 2008 will be found on web site
http://groups.google.com/group/guardians-of-the-canadians-charter-of-rights-and-freedoms 139
Obviously the people need to be informed in
the public interest and a loud public
hearing is the quickest way to a PUBLIC
INQUIRY and then some trials and due
punishment in deterrence initiatives with a
restructured system and a completely
independent body of the people for the people
with authority to bring all issues before the
people which the media are more than morally
responsible to do.
They must not be allowed to be harassed by the
government in anyway.
140
January 10 2008
Fax 604-501-4095

Frank Gallagher
Manager, CST RET.
Dear Andree Leduc
On December 27 2007 I responded by –email to your letter of December 20 2007 requesting you not to
delete the evidence I was sending you as you had stated you would as of the 20th.
The following was copied from page 6 of my December 27 2007 response
PS
I am an individual of Canada and I expect equal service and benefit of your office and demand you do not
delete any further e-mails I send you which will be and are your responsibility under your mandate.
I remind you I have done nothing but act responsibly and it is you who are wanting, necessitating me to
attend to the matter.
To that endeavor I will expect an immediate acknowledgement of receipt as a reply

e-mail with contents of my request attached.
On receipt I will expect acknowledgement by e-mail with your assurance you will cooperate in a manner
consistent with and conducive to every individual’s guaranteed Charter rights and in particular mine in
efficient and effective manner with due regard to the rights of the tax payers.
141
You did not respond to acknowledge receipt so I resent the 27th document on December 31 2007 but no
acknowledgement.
On January 2 2008 I faxed the document to your office as I had stated I will apprise you of the evidence
by other means available to me.
I expected you to comply with following

On receipt I will expect acknowledgement by e-mail with your assurance you will cooperate in a manner
consistent with and conducive to every individual’s guaranteed Charter rights and in particular mine in
efficient and effective manner with due regard to the rights of the tax payers.
On the morning of January 4 2008 I e-mailed you a 42 page document informing you the RCMP
Commissioner was delinquent with his 30 day status report which I expected around December 16 2007
and requested an immediate review of the complaint but you have not acknowledged receipt of that
document.
On the same day I faxed you at 10.50 AM “Fax RCMP Complaint January 4 2008” 15 page document
informing you said 42 page document was published on my web site document “RCMP Complaint January
4 2008”
You have not acknowledged or responded to any of these documents indicating you are intent on not
cooperating with me.
This of course is indicative of the government conspiracy against the individual of the moral majority
which I have persistently alleged and evidenced on my web site.
You would think a legitimate government would be more responsible and cooperative with the people
operating under the auspices of the Constitution which included the Canadian Charter of Rights and
Freedoms which guarantees every individual equality of protection and benefit in all matters before and
under the law where Stockwell Day stated in his November 2 2007 e-mail to me
“The Government is committed to a high standard of transparency and accountability and is taking action
to ensure government business is conducted in a responsible manner.”
It seems to me you owe me an apology and a response to those documents mentioned above
acknowledging that you will read any further documentation I send you by e-mail which I send to keep
you informed so you will be competent to deal with the issues as they arise.
This is the way people go about improving their competence in the private sector rather than following a
book of general instructions.
I suppose you people feel I am somewhat of a pain in the ass but there are two cheeks to the story and I
remind you I have been 24/7 for 2 ½ years trying to get the justice I am entitled to which has eluded me to
the moment because the government personnel don’t have a clue as to the meaning of the word nor how to
go about putting an efficient and effective modus operandi in place capable of backing every individuals
guaranteed equal rights as provided by the Charter.
Not only have they demonstrated their incompetence to do so but they have clearly shown they never
intended to do so as their initiative is to ransack the moral majority why they naively believe and trust the
government personnel
142
September 26 2008
Frank Gallagher
Commission for Public Complaints Against the RCMP 34 Riverglen Drive
Keswick, On.
Reviews & Investigations Unit L4P 2P8
905-476-8959
frank@cdf.name
FAX #: 613-952-8045
Manager
TELEPHONE #: 1-800-267-6637 Charter Democracy Force
www.cdf.name
E-MAIL ADDRESS: reviews@cpc-cpp.gc.ca

Re:
RequestReviewofComplaintSeptember232008(datecorrectionSeptember252008.
doc)
RCMP refuse to investigate
Government corruption and conspiracy
Re: Further Waste of Tax Money

Request for immediate Public Inquiry
Dear Reviews & Investigations Unit
As you are aware my Request Review of Complaint September 23 2008 (date correction September 25 2008)
included a copy of the RCMP Final Letter of Disposition signed by RCMP Superintendent Robert Davis, District
Commander, Greater Toronto Area.
I listed his false statements under the heading False statements are underlined.
I draw your attention to paragraph 4 with my commentary, which I have copied below
(Correction: October 18 2007 not October 7 2007) perhaps a note on the file. As far
as Inspector Brian Verheul is concerned Superintendent Robert Davis states Inspector Verheul
instructed Sergeant Thomson and to how to deal with the evidence and is therefore responsible for
Sergeant Thomson’s actions. Inspector Brian Verheul had plenty of time to confirm whether or not
143
the evidence was relative to the Government Organized Crime of corruption and conspiracy. It is yet
to be determined if Inspector Verheul acted on his own or… consulted with his superiors.)
It is superfluous to just stick with the complaint I filed November 8 2007 against Sergeant Roy
Steinebach and Inspector Brian Verheul. They have some splainin to do as does Superintendent
Robert Davis that will inevitably lead to their superiors.
I complained of Government corruption and conspiracy and they refused to investigate, and when
Staff Sergeant R.B.MacAdam investigated the evidence thorough and thoughtful when forming
conclusions based on the relevant evidence, in order to determine which was relevant he had to be
thorough and thoughtful as he stated he was.
That remains to be seen but Superintendent Robert Davis’s report is self- evident he is not.
I reiterate all police have a responsibility to be consistent with the Police Services Act and the
Constitution conducive to every individual’s guaranteed Charter rights of equal protection and
benefits and it is each person’s superior that is responsible to see that they are competent
responsible and irreproachable with fortitude and conviction to every individual as guaranteed with
particular attention to victims, attentive to any flaws in the system that should be addressed to
prevent such reoccurrences to some other individual.
Police Services Act

serve.
Obviously Inspector Robert Davis has insulted my intelligence and demonstrated his
incompetence for success as either the bad or good guy.
You will see in many of my writings I presumed the RCMP Commissioner William Elliot had
been consulted and it was he who actually is behind the refusal to investigate along with
Minister of Public Safety and so on right up to the DOJ and higher.
*******************************************************************************
****
Inspector Robert Davis emphasizes that despite the hundreds of pages of documentation involved in
my complaint, the RCMP’s sole mandate was to determine whether or not the members acted
appropriately, and I have made it quite clear the RCMP have refused to investigate Government
Organized Crime of corruption and conspiracy with irrefutable evidence published on my web sites
which they were required to study to determine if the evidence was valid.
144
In Staff Sergeant R.B.MacAdam’s interim report of May 20 2008 he states he studied the evidence in a
manner he felt was thorough and thoughtful when forming conclusions based on the relevant
evidence
3) After careful consideration of the details surrounding my complaint, Inspector Robert Davis finds
no evidence that indicates that Sergeant Steinebach or Inspector Verheul acted improperly and
furthermore he supports Inspector Verheul’s directives, given the nature of the file and the
documentation being provided.
I never believed at any time they were doing anything other than following orders of their superiors and
with that thought in mind they did not act improperly obeying their superiors.
However, with Staff Sergeant R.B. MacAdam spending 8 months on studying the evidence thoroughly
and thoughtfully before forming his conclusions in his report and Inspector Robert Davis with careful
consideration of the details surrounding my complaint….of government organized crime of corruption
and conspiracy which the evidence irrefutably proves his Final Letter of Disposition deliberately ignores
the valid irrefutable evidence and consistent with the modus of operandi of the conspirators as irrefutably
documented the Inspector once again attempts to divert the issues irrefutably proving he refuses to
investigate the Government Organized Crime of corruption and conspiracy that the evidence they studied
irrefutably attests to.
So as to remove any doubt as to the fact that it was not the 2 RCMP members I named as refusing to
investigate the Government Organized Crime of corruption and conspiracy and they were only acting on
orders from their superiors who were really behind the refusal to investigate the Government Organized
Crime of corruption and conspiracy and in fact are major players in the conspiracy I draw your attention to
the CDF –Bugs web site http://groups.google.com/group/cdf-bugs-charter-democracy-force-bares-
ultimate-government-scam
On September 15 2008 I have clearly requested Inspector Robert Davis along with the RCMP
Commissioner William Elliot and RCMP Inspector Pierre Leduc to study the evidence they are already
familiar with for the purpose of charging the major player in the Ontario Government Organized Crime of
corruption and conspiracy, Ontario Attorney General Chris Bentley as the evidence irrefutably proves.
They can not attempt to try their BENEVOLENCE, RIGHTEOUSNESS and MORALITY ploy again
suggesting the RCMP’s sole mandate was to determine anything other than the validity of the evidence on
my web sites that irrefutably proves Government Organized Crime of corruption and conspiracy.
They have not responded to me as of this 26th day of September 2008 for obvious reason they are well
aware of the conspiracy being major players.
This is pertinent evident to my

RequestReviewofComplaintSeptember232008(datecorrectionSeptember252008.
doc) published on the RCMP Final Letter of Disposition web site
http://groups.google.com/group/rcmp-final-letter-of-disposition where all evidence published and
referenced on that site is pertinent.
145
It would be futile and a further waste of taxpayer’s money for me to file a new complaint with the
Commission for Public Complaints against the RCMP providing all the pertinent evidence you are
required to study now under the original complaints File No. PC-2007-2316
and File No. PC-2007-2317, which would only conclude with more evidence of their refusal to investigate
Government Organized Crime of corruption and conspiracy because they are irrefutably major players and
the success of the Government conspiracy could simply not have happened without their cooperation.
It would be incomprehensible for you to study the evidence and not grant my Request Review of
Complaint following my directions stated therein to go through the formalities to prove what the evidence
has already irrefutably proven.
The fact is even a Review is a waste of your time, mine, and the taxpayer’s money when ultimately a
PUBLIC INQUIRY is warranted.
I remind you that there is no government department or agency hat has been provided a mandate that
specifically authorizes them to eradicate Government Organized Crime of corruption and conspiracy
simply because the conspirators issue the mandates.
I also remind you that there is no government department or agency hat has been provided a mandate that
specifically does not authorize them to eradicate Government Organized Crime of corruption and
conspiracy
The following was extracted from the Law Society of Upper Canada Lawyers Rules of Conduct.
(103) Interpretation
(f) rules of professional conduct cannot address every situation, and a lawyer should observe the rules in
the spirit as well as in the letter.
with the provisions of the Constitution is, to the extent of the inconsistency, of no force or
effect.
How could anyone interpret his or her mandate to be anything less than consistent with the Constitution
conducive to every individual’s guaranteed Charter rights of equal protection and benefits?
The conspirators are obviously adverse to “The Spirit of the Law”
When one is adept to moral thought and reason consistent with “The Spirit of the Law” they are alert to the
fact that personnel financed by the people to protect them as guaranteed must be competent responsible
irreproachable with fortitude and conviction to structure a legal system that is competent responsible
irreproachable with fortitude and conviction to ensure all personnel are competent responsible
irreproachable with fortitude and conviction.
146
The RCMP Final Letter of Disposition is self – evident that the RCMP upper echelon is not the
prerequisite competent responsible irreproachable people with fortitude and conviction to protect every
individual as guaranteed.
Clearly the 2 part Law Society of Upper Canada document they studied irrefutably proves the Law Society
is not staffed with the prerequisite competent responsible irreproachable people with fortitude and
conviction to protect every individual as guaranteed.
Clearly their members holding every position of authority in the entire legal system are not the prerequisite
competent responsible irreproachable people with fortitude and conviction to protect every individual as
guaranteed, having been provided all the evidence published on my web sites which includes the 2 part
Law Society of Upper Canada document which they have obviously not seen anything wrong with their
absurd adverse inconsistency with “The
Spirit of the Law”.
Just as obvious as the fact they are all members of the Law Society is the fact they are in the business for
luxurious lifestyle taking advantage of their humongous opportunity to ransack society masquerading as
the prerequisite competent responsible irreproachable people with fortitude and conviction to protect every
individual as guaranteed, when decidedly they are not as the evidence irrefutably proves and everything
they do is purposely to obstruct justice from eradicating them.
It is obvious that the individual does not have the wherewithal to deal with them, nor does any one
department or agency that look for advice from the Ontario Attorney General whose responsibility is to
advise them consistent with the constitution as “guardian of the public interest”
Those of you who have been advised by the Attorney General inconsistent with the Constitution not
conducive to every individual’s guaranteed Charter rights must reflect on their adeptness to moral thought
and reason consistent with “The Spirit of the Law” and their competence to serve the Constitution and its
people.
Given the irrefutable evidence it is imperative for every one of you financed in the legal system to protect
every individual as guaranteed by the Charter to reflect on the part you have played to obstruct an
individuals plea for justice consistent with the Constitution.
You hold major evidence as to who advised you and of course we all know the “Roles and Responsibilities
of the Attorney General” is self-evident.
Reality attests to everything pertinent to these issues as is the necessity to be mentally strong as an
individual to stand up for the people seemingly alone with the world on your shoulders a reality no person
would expect of another.
But that is not the case because once that person exposes the truth of the Government Organized Crime of
corruption and conspiracy to the pubic the majority of Canadian individuals will be immediately standing
there side by side with that person of strength of integrity and conviction along with the Constitution, the
supremacy of God and the irrefutable evidence of the Charter Democracy Force.
Who of you has half the guts of our Armed Forces personnel to come forward and stand up for the
democracy of Canada and the guaranteed Charter rights of every individual?
147
On receipt of this document your actions will be self-evident.
Frank Gallagher
Manager
Cc AAAAAALIST
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
Julia Munro, MPP
York North
August 21, 2007
Dear Ms Munro
I am writing in response to your response of July 31 2007 to my e-mail communication of July 23 2007
which was just one of a preponderance of e-mail communications I have sent you describing the
inappropriate actions of the establishment.
I do not apologize for my tardiness to respond to your response for I am confident that you were not
requiring a response and perhaps you even knelt in prayer that you had heard the last from me.
I do wonder what caused you to respond to this particular letter and not the many others preceding them. I
will review that letter as I am wont to do for anything significant that may help in my unrelenting endeavor
to trigger a domino like action sooner than later which will befall upon the conspirators of the counterfeit
democracy.
The stage is set and they have persistently done it to themselves for they have taken far too many strides
away from the law and have trusted too many to be loyal to their cause and trusted the people would
remain ignorant to their ingenious plot but over the years with the significant improvement in
communications the plot thickens to a gel which finds them stuck fast with their hands in the kitty and I do
not make reference to a cat although that would have been the best way to get attention but not an option
where only truth will suffice..
The evidence I have provided you irrefutably proves the whole legal system acts consistently to deceive
the people and in fact the system is successful due the loyalty of the establishment personnel to the
conspiracy.
As an MPP, an elected representative of the people it is inappropriate of you not to interfere in the
workings of provincial adjudicative agencies, the courts or any other body which is detrimental to the well
being of your constituents as well as all constituents in Ontario.
If you have perused the evidence and choose to remain ignorant you are no different than the rest of the
personnel of the establishment and are as much a part of the conspiracy and corruption as are the rest as
your letter clearly indicates.
What is appropriate to the conspiracy is your loyalty to it which of course is inappropriate to the people
and the Charter itself which guarantees the individual rights and freedoms.
I reiterate that I have presented you a comprehensive package of evidence which irrefutably proves the
whole legal system is corrupt and in fact is a deliberate conspiracy against the people.
Perchance you are not alert to the fact that you play a major role in this conspiracy as do the other MPP’s
so I ask you to have another look at my writings as they would be viewed from the people’s stand point if
they were provided the opportunity to access them.
The fact that you persistently suggest I seek legal advice proves you are not coherent to the facts of my
writings or are not sympathetic to the needs and well being of the people or both.
155
As you surely are aware the laws of Ontario must be consistent with the Constitution, the supreme law of
Canada and all laws are significantly influenced by lawyers who have infiltrated the establishment which
would be presumed to be natural and reasonable considering they are the only profession authorized to
practice law.
The problem is they are a personal interest group who assures their interests are attended to before the
enactments of laws which are intended to benefit every individual fairly and equally.
DO YOU SEE WHAT I MEAN?
Have you read any of the correspondence between me and the Law Society of Upper Canada?
I have forwarded you a copy of the BLACK BOOK which contains the correspondence I had with their
representatives up until September 1 2006 but there is a considerable amount more which I would like to
direct your attention to.
Lawyers don’t give a damn about the people’s Constitutional rights and have bestowed that as a privilege
upon them which is the accepted practice by all the members of the Society which includes the provincial
adjudicative agencies and the courts.
The whole damn justice system.
Judge’s don’t become judges without considerable experience practicing law and as the Law Society of
Upper Canada has explained to me their members concerns are only to the best interest of their clients and
to that endeavor they feel free to tromp all over their clients adversaries Constitutional rights.
There is much more than moral issues here for they have no conscience and feel they have the legal right
to do so and who of them would argue given the financial benefit to them all.
They are organized crime of the most high whose ingenious scheme is dependent on the loyalty or naivety
of those amongst or around them.
They are obviously not a secret society but they operate under a secret code which is only secret due the
ignorance and trusting nature of the people who actually have little choice but presume they are intent on
justice for the people.
All that stands between their form of justice and true Constitutional justice is the Wall of Ignorance which
would come tumbling down if you were to address the issues appropriately for the people and not to
continue acting appropriately for the conspiracy against the people, whether loyal or naïve to their cause.
The only difference between ignorance and intelligence is knowledge and the ability to use it for a
purpose.
The difference between good and evil is the purpose you use it.
156
You know full well what the people perceive as your intended purpose but your correspondence betrays
you clearly showing your inability to analyze the evidence or your reluctance to do so.
LAWYERS ARE NOT A VIABLE OPTION to me or any other person of moral purpose.
I have provided an attachment dated February 10 2007 regarding a personal incident which I had reported
to the Law Society of Upper Canada.
Their responses to me prove they have no concern for the guaranteed Charter rights of the people of
society and their only concern is to their society and its members who by their response of August 15 2006
clearly explains the Society’s role in society which is not consistent with the society demanded by the
Constitution Act, 1982 which guarantees clear and specific rights equally to each individual.
This section: 15.(1) is clearly representative of that which would be expected of an ideology which
recognizes the supremacy of God as stated in the first line of the Canadian Charter of Rights and
Freedoms.
Whereas Canada is founded upon principles that recognize the supremacy of God and the rule of law:
As you struggle to remain focused on the content of the 40 pages of the attachment I request that you
reflect a little on the fact that I have requested you to read it for the purpose of being coherent to the facts
so that you may act informed and appropriately for the people who you represent.
Assuming you are alert you will recognize the efforts I have made to this endeavor and have done so to the
best of my ability which has proven to be inadequate for more reason than just my inexperience and
incompetence as an author.
It is the inadequacies of the establishment to seek the truth for they are founded on deceit and intent on
covering this truth as they purport to seek the truth for the benefit of the people of society.
Though the entirety of the 40 page attachment there is an exorbitant number of words used to bring
attention to the fact that a lawyer wrote me to state that my contract with Dalglaish/Silverthorne had been
terminated because there was a completion date that I had not met and then went on to state more
malicious lies about my competence to fulfill the requirements of the contract.
Throughout the 40 pages I requested the lawyer to provide me and the Law Society a copy of the contract
which he referred to which would prove he had no authority to terminate the contract for it clearly had no
starting or completion date and in fact stated that I would be finished only when I have fulfilled the
requirements of the contract and Ms Silverthorne was completely satisfied that I have done so. I will
forward a copy of the contract upon request.
This doesn’t require a major court case to resolve considering the Law Society of Upper Canada personnel
are lawyers themselves who should be competent to see the injustice perpetrated by its member who
uttered lies for the benefit of his client who was not out to seek justice but in fact was intent to use the
system for his own evil purpose.
157
The legal system is not at all what the people are led to believe and only those with careers in the system
benefit which includes the criminal element for they know the inadequacies of the system which is their
business to know and use for their criminal purpose.
Ask any criminal if he is one and he will deny as sure as any lawyer who is willing to protect him under
the guise of assuring their rights are being protected as they step all over the moral peoples rights while
doing so.
The peoples rights are a given, clearly defined in the Charter yet lawyers who we presume are on the side
of the law and a moral society prove by their actions they are not and what recourse does a moral person
have?
Hire a lawyer to take a lawyer to court where they will be judged by a lawyer who has already proven that
he has been successful in the deception?
I think not.
A person is only entitled to the full protection of the law which he is entitled to which goes with the
presumption of innocence.
When clear evidence is provided that suggests one is not as innocent as presumed it is a logical recourse
that they be provided the opportunity to prove their innocence.
One of the best ways to do so is to allow an officer of the law to present the evidence which suggests their
non compliance with the law and request the person to cooperate in their investigation to confirm their
innocence as any moral innocent person would do.
Refusing to let an officer search ones premises in performance of his or her duty to gather evidence is an
obstruction of justice which benefits only the immoral for the victim is hindered from seeking the evidence
which would lead to justice and compensation.
What legitimate reason would a person have to deny a search that would prove them innocent where
cooperation aids in the sanctity of everyone’s guaranteed rights of protection.
It must be everyone’s duty to cooperate with the law
Surely one who steals from someone must be made to reimburse the victim and fully compensate him for
his trouble if justice is to be considered served.
When lawyers advise their clients of their rights not to speak to anyone without legal counsel they do not
consider the rights of the people of society to know the truth in seeking justice and to get it as efficiently
and cost effective as they can.
Truth is the magic word when it comes to justice.
Without it justice is improbable yet lawyers do their best to obscure it and the best make it to be judges
who purportedly seek the whole truth nothing but the truth
158
The evidence in my particular situation regarding the criminal act of fraud by my former tenant is
irrefutable as you should already know having read my letter to the Toronto Sun dated October 8 2006 and
yet injustice goes on as detailed in my 15 Lawyer Files which I have also sent you.
SURELY YOU MUST SEE WHAT I MEAN.
By the way, I have sent the evidence to more than 20 lawyers to act on my behalf but I have only received
one response which stated that it would literally require hundreds of hours to proceed and he was alone in a
small business that did not have the time to do the case justice but wished me luck.
That describes the system very well and only those with money have the opportunity to play that game of
chance.
The more money the more luck.
That is what lawyers are all about and I should clarify that they are no different than any other person
whose conscience would be significantly tested given the opportunity of circumstance.
As is often said “But for circumstance go I”
I have brought all this and more to your attention for you to have the appropriate circumstance to act on
behalf of the people, your constituents and yourself to reveal the present and clear circumstances which
stand in the way of a moral society.
How obvious can it be that we need watchdogs to oversee watchdogs to the infinitive if we can not trust
you and others like you to look coherently at the evidence and respond likewise?
If not you, then who?
I have written everyone I can possibly think of as you know, except perhaps the Queen and the problem
remains.
I have written the Governor General and the Lieutenant Governor of Ontario but they have found no
reason to respond.
The only way this rampant assault on the people by those with the opportunity to do so is to inform the
people of the truth and let nature take its course.
That is what you can do as you have the experience and knowledge to commence or cause to commence
proceedings which will eventually remediate the circumstances which allow the pilfering of the people by
the professionals who use the powers bestowed upon them by the authority of the Constitution to bestow
upon themselves a greater power for their personal benefit humongously detrimental to the people and
society as a whole whom they profess to serve.
I have every reason to believe that you as my representative are the appropriate person to appropriately
deal with these serious issues which are detrimental to your constituents and in fact to people world wide.
159
Inspector Graeme Turl of the York Regional Police has advised me in his letter of August 16 2007
(Please see page 12) that the issues concerning the laws of Canada should be brought to the attention
of my MP and my MPP which I have persistently for some time now but Peter Van Loan will not
respond and you have declined to deal with the issues.
You have been armed with the evidence you need, you need only comprehend it and then act appropriately
for the people not the establishment which has conspired against them.
I am sure I have provided you more than an appropriate amount of evidence to assure you know what I
mean so I will presume that you DO KNOW WHAT I MEAN.
Now I suggest to you that your immediate action is required to demonstrate where you stand.
If you believe I am wrong in my analysis of the evidence you should not fear bringing it forth for the
people to decide and in fact if you are a people too it is incumbent upon you to do so.
Perhaps you feel they are too ignorant to decide and you could relay that message as well.
The evidence remains which includes your efforts of July 31 2007 which I dare say is far from appropriate
to the circumstances.
Perhaps now that I have informed you that lawyers will not help me you might wonder why and reread
more closely that which I have intended to convey to you over the months.
I can not perceive that I have not provided you the irrefutable proof of what is wrong nor can I believe that
you are not coherent to the facts if you have applied yourself to that endeavor on behalf of the people
whom you proclaim to be for so I ask you to ponder the words above and below from 2500 years ago
where the struggle of humankind persists today due the same reasons they did then.
It is not from not knowing what must be done for it has always been there for the doing
Integrity is a word which clearly defines what the personnel of the establishment profess they have and
their actions clearly are testament to the fact that they are unequivocal liars.
7. Everyone has the right to life, liberty and security of the person and the right not to be deprived
thereof except in accordance with the principles of fundamental justice.
To me that clearly states that every individual is entitled to all the rights as defined in the Charter as long
as they are in compliance with the Charter and in respect of each individual’s equal rights not to be
deprived but when irrefutable evidence is provided that one acted in disrespect of the Charter and an
160
individuals guaranteed rights they are to be held in disrespect of their inherent Charter rights in accordance
with the principles of fundamental justice which is commonly known to humankind and definitely not
that which is provided and interpreted by the legal profession which defines justice as getting all that they
possibly can out of unfortunate circumstances brought to their attention.
If you will imagine two lawyers discussing the outcome of a case, could you imagine the following as a
probable conversation between them?
If you had of done justice to that case Zeb, you would be retired and want for nothing.
Abe, I could never retire, this is what I do. I am a lawyer for God’s sake.
It’s the excitement of taking even the smallest case and developing it into a profitable entity that
would please the Gods without actually killing the innocent ignorant soles who we throw back into the
pool in consideration of the members of our society who appreciate that our efforts today assure their
affluent existence of tomorrow.
But what if the truth gets out Zeb?

Hell it’s already out. Why do you think we have so many Society members all feeding from the trough of
truth?
They’re dumb and we are smart. They get what they deserve and so do we.
Damn Zeb, you know what I mean. What if the people find out?
How Abe? How will they find out?
You know Julia Munro.

The question is will you do it?
Reality is a staggering number of truths which each truth is supported by a staggering amount of evidence
which support no lies but identify the liars.
One who proclaims to exist for the benefit of the people but refuses to act to that endeavor is more than a
liar but not less than a traitor.
I beseech you study the evidence until you are certain you are coherent to the facts and the issues I have
brought forth to you and act without prejudice or bias in service of the people.
That will require you to have an honest look at your self and what your true purpose is.
The evidence is clear as to what is expected of you considering all things that are real and once again I
suggest that if you have any doubt as to what the people want of you all you need do is ask them.
You have the wherewithal and access to the media which I can only wish for or pass the information to
you and wish you do the honors.
Remember that mine is not a selfish wish for it is the wish of all humankind since the beginning of time
which we may eventually know once truth becomes the way and kneeling in prayer identified for what it
is.
161
A wasted effort wishing for something that one has given up on or never tried to understand to a point of
dealing with the reality which finds one on their knees.
Twenty billion people praying will not stop the floods and other effects of global warming nor praying that
someone else will solve the problem for it was someone else who caused it.
It surely wasn’t you or you who caused the problem and you on your knees surely are not helping other
than to keep out of the way of those who are actually trying.
Everyone can help in one way or another regardless of their familiarity with a problem for all they need do
is recognize the problem and see that it is tended to appropriately.
If I were with a person alone who just cut his arm off would I pray for a doctor or attempt to improvise as
if I was one?
Snap out of it where ever you are.

Delve into the evidence and look around you to see how things really are.
I thank you for your time and pray standing that you will make every effort to comprehend the issues and
why you who has earned a respected position of trust has been provided the opportunity to strut your stuff
in respect of that trust, the people and the principles the Constitution is founded on.
If you should require more documentation or have any questions at all regarding my writings please do not
hesitate to e-mail me.
Only by meaningful dialogue can we remove any ambiguity that may exist in your mind and in that
endeavor I suggest that we meet.
Throughout my writings I have attempted to answer all the questions so they need not be asked but if you
have one that escaped me I would appreciate the opportunity to respond to it.
Surely you have given my writings some thought but I suggest not enough nor are you coherent to the facts
which call out loud and clear for your help which you would do so for the people if you were indeed for
the people and if indeed you are cognizant of the facts.
Don’t ask for whom the bell tolls for it tolls for thee……and me and everyone who hears it.
DO YOU HEAR IT?
With due respect I ask that you respect my concerns which should concern you as they would concern
anyone who is aware of my concerns.
Those people who have not responded and those who have, acted inappropriately in accordance with the
Constitution, the aspirations of God, and the people.
Those who responded as you did appropriate to the conspiracy would appear to the naïve that you give
sound advice but quite contraire to one privy of the facts and cares for the well being of the people of
society and respects each individuals guaranteed Charter rights as if they were their own which of course
would be if they were similarly respected by everyone.
162
PLEASE, PLEASE TELL ME THAT YOU KNOW WHAT I MEAN.
Tell me you know that the Constitution is incapable of enforcement for it is just a document and tell me
that you know the administering and enforcement of the individual guaranteed Charter rights must be done
by the people financed to do so in a manner conducive to the Charter where consistency is demanded to
that endeavor so as to demonstrate due diligence to the guarantee which is the catalyst intended to protect
each and every individual equally, and any personnel in the government employ assigned to the
administration and enforcement must be held responsible to that endeavor lest the guarantee be a worthless
piece of paper as worthless as the person who failed the people as assigned.
We can not correct the damage done but we can sure as hell be sure that person does not remain in such a
position so as to put our rights and freedoms in immanent danger.
Okay, I know you have to know what I mean or I am writing to a person reincarnated as a potato with eyes
and ears but nothing under the skin that resembles a brain or a heart which may influence a conscience,
which may very well exist in a potato for it is invisible to the common person, but even the astute who may
be blind and still see into one’s conscience may be well advised never to suggest they have communicated
with a potato unless of course they have studied it well as might a farmer or a related specialists.
With just one more “DO YOU KNOW WHAT I MEAN?” I depart anxiously awaiting any sign of
comprehension from your end.
I am not sorry if you find me to be a pain in the ass and I gladly say you are welcome if you are pleased
that I have brought these significant issues concerning the well being of the people to your attention.
In either case, appropriate action is demanded and one would be wise given the choice to take the option
which leaves them in charge of their destiny.
You know what I mean.
Sincerely
Frank Gallagher
PS
I may not have dotted every I or crossed every t for I trust the program to do it and when I and the people
can trust the establishment to do what is necessary for the benefit of the people we will know that there is a
program in place which we have good reason to trust.
Your focus to the relevant facts in the attachment “Law Society” is requested and necessary to derive at the
appropriate conclusion.
Although there is a lot to read it all has significant purpose relative to the well being of the people which is
your legitimate purpose.
Speed reading will satisfy your conscience that you have read it but your response will reveal the truth of
so many things, perhaps at least one more than you realize.
You need not fear the truth if you are honest and forthright. Please change He to She in the following
statement to retain focus as to whom it is directed.
163
THRESHOLD FOR A CRIMINAL PROSECUTION
On page 12 is a copy of a response from the York Regional Police dated August 16 2007 which once again
states that I was informed that the facts of my incident didn’t meet the threshold for a criminal prosecution.
I have repeatedly requested that the YRP inform me as to what the threshold is as well as the other
police departments but they refuse to answer.
I have also asked if it has anything to do with the amount of money involved and I suspect perhaps the
problem is there is no money to be made by the legal people and justice is not served.
The fact that they condone such criminal acts in their courts clearly shows their concern for the law and the
protection of the people.
The best way to deal with crime is to stop it before it happens and that is the ideology of punishment to
deter crime.
By not dealing with such cases crime can only spread as the word is passed along to the immoral and of
course when crime flourishes so does the legal system to the great detriment of the people.
I will forward the YRP a copy of this letter requesting once again that they answer this question?
I reiterate that if you have attentively studied my writings in particular the letter to the Toronto Sun dated
October 8 2006 you will know that the evidence irrefutably proves the criminal acts were committed by
Don Wilson my former tenant.
The recording of the Tribunal hearing TNL-67103 clearly proves the same thing and I have provided the
YRP with a copy.
I notice that each time a different person from the YRP reviews the evidence they actually just look for
what ever their personnel have previously stated and reiterate their words where not one has addressed the
issues.
I reiterate they have every piece of evidence that could possibly be required to support my allegations so it
would be impossible to ever prosecute anyone for criminal acts.
THESE ARE VERY SERIOUS MATTERS AND I ADAMANTLY REQUEST YOU REVIEW THE
EVIDENCE WITHOUT PREJUDICE AND BIAS.
SINCERELY
Frank Gallagher
PS
Chief Armand P LaBarge

York Regional Police
164
Please personally respond to the “threshold” matter above stating clearly where the evidence I have
provided you concerning the criminal act of fraud committed by Don Wilson my former tenant in a court
room financed by the people to administer justice to and for the people in the endeavour to protect them in
accordance with the provisions of the Charter by administering punishment to deter crime before it is
committed, falls short of the “threshold for a criminal prosecution”.
The evidence is quite clear that the only thing that falls short is the entire legal system.
It has been over 2 years since I began my trek for justice and you have the records of my trek which
clearly shows I have circled, crisscrossed and proliferated the system with pertinent documents vital to the
sanctity of the people’s Charter rights and their well being.
I will be faxing you a copy of the 40 page document regarding the law society which clearly shows where
the problem lies in the system.
How can we possibly expect our rights to be protected controlled by lawyers whose professional conduct is
monitored by the Law Society of Upper Canada who clearly state their lawyer members only responsibility
is to the interest of their clients an other words where the money comes from.
The evidence is clear and the people desperately need your help.
Peter Van Loan, MP
As my Federal representative I request you apply yourself attentively to the issues addressed above
I need not explain further as to how serious these issues are.
The obstruction of Justice by Hon. John Garretsen addressed in Lawyer File # 3 and other writings is an
example of the disregard for the laws of Ontario and Canada by the personnel of the establishment and I
obviously request you deal with him in the appropriate manner consistent with the spirit of the Constitution
in respect of the people’s perspective.
165
August 15 2007
166
Cover letter to the Ministry of Community Safety and Correctional Services
I have attached a copy of a letter I sent to Judy Phillips of the Attorney General’s office which is intent on
sending me in circles until my demise rather than deal with the issues realistically in a manner conducive
to the Constitution and the well being of the people which it was enacted to protect as defined under the
Charter.
Clearly the Attorney General is in the position with superior influence to address the issues efficiently and
effectively in the spirit of the Constitution and the people but is reluctant to do so.
I offer you the opportunity to give him a nudge as I have done with the Ombudsman and the Civilian
Commission on Police Services your predecessor I presume.
I also presume the same staff is still on board and even though this is the second time around for me with
as predictable a conclusion as I expected the first time when Karen Knoakes of the York Regional Police
advised that I may forward my complaint to the Civilian Commission on Police Services which I did on
November 15 2006.
Judy Phillips was kind enough to provide me with your fax number 416-325-6067 which I use to forward
this to you.
If you are the same people operating under different name you will already have a prodigious amount of
correspondence and evidence in your files under Ontario Civilian Commission on Police Services File 06-
COM-085 including the 15 Lawyer Files and a copy of my letter to the Toronto Sun dated October 8 2006.
In any case I presume you have access to this file and I hereby request you review it to bring you up to
speed and to get into the true spirit of my concerns and the issues addressed.
Please advise if you do not have access to these files with a brief explanation as to why not and I will
resend them to you.
I would appreciate an e-mail address for this endeavor to save me costs and time.
The letter to the Toronto Sun dated October 8 2006 includes the irrefutable evidence that Don Wilson my
former tenant committed 2 counts of fraud over $100,000 and provided the ORHT false and misleading
information which is an offense under s. 206 (2) of the Tenant Protection Act, 1997 which would have
costs me $43,000 if I had not been successful in producing the evidence to rebut his dispute.
Once these facts are clear in your mind that these criminal acts were committed as stated at 375 D’Arcy
Street Newmarket, witnessed by the judicator Nancy Fahlgren of the Ontario Rental Housing Tribunal and
is a matter of record that occurred in a public building operated by the ORHT mandated and financed to
administer justice for and to the people of the province of Ontario you will understand that such defiance
of the law can not be condoned by people who are financed to administer law and dispense justice which
ultimately means punish to deter crime not condone to encourage it.
As per my original complaint I request the York Regional Police namely Chief Armand P Labarge and
Deputy Chief Bruce Herridge commence or cause to commence proceedings
against Don Wilson in respect of the crimes he committed in the people’s court.
167
Once again I request the YRP investigate the ORHT for obstruction of justice and tampering with
evidence.
I request they systematically commence or cause to commence proceedings against each and every person
detailed throughout my Lawyer Files 1-14 and 13A for obstruction of justice and other matters detailed
within the files.
Should any of these people now agree to perform their duty in dealing with the issues contained within I
request the charges against them be put on hold with the possibility they will be dropped on proper
demonstration of due diligence to the benefit of the people as per the guarantee of the people’s Charter
rights.
I find it prudent at this time to advise you to be particularly alert to the significance of your attentiveness to
your duty in the whole scheme of things and that you address the issues responsibly as they affect the
whole scheme of things.
We are talking about corruption and a government conspiracy and your focus must be keen to the
eradication of such evil.
It is incomprehensible that anyone in the employ of administration and enforcement would glean through
the evidence I provided and find the significant matter I am addressing can be resolved in civil court.
The evidence demands a full fledged investigation by the proper authorities who should do so with great
enthusiasm in performance of their duty to eradicate immorality from the face of the earth in respect of the
people’s Charter rights who finance and trust you all to do so.
I suggest once again that the YRP, OPP and the RCMP get together to deal with these issues competently,
effectively and efficiently.
I have attached a copy of the letter from the Ministry of the Attorney General. (Page 7)
As previously stated please let me know if you require any more information and regardless please send
me your e-mail address so I can forward other pertinent information.
When you open the Ontario Civilian Commission on Police Services File 06-COM-085 you will note that I
had also requested they review my complaint against the OPP Anti- Rackets and the RCMP which the
Ontario Civilian Commission on Police Services did not respond to.
Please do so now.
Thank you
Frank Gallagher franklyone@hotmail.com
Cc YRP Chief Armand LaBarge, Deputy Chief Bruce Herridge

OPP Anti-Rackets Randy Craig, Detective Sergeant
OPP Commissioner Julian Fantino
RCMP Michael Thomson, Inspector
168
Ministry of the
Attorney General
Communications Branch
Attn, Judy Phillips

Manager, Correspondence & Public Inquiries Unit
720 Bay Street,11th Floor

Toronto, On M5G 2K1
Fax: 416-326-4007
August 15, 2007 Re: Your letter of August 10 2007 Your Reference #: M07-04864
Dear Ms. Phillips
I reiterate: THIS IS NOT MY PERSONAL LEGAL MATTER.
Although I will agree that I am addressing the issues personally I have provided the Attorney General a
prodigious amount of correspondence and evidence clearly stating the circumstances which have caused
me to bring the issues to him.
The issues clearly are an INTERNAL problem with the Ontario Legal System which is inconsistent with
the Constitution Act 1982 which contains the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms.
The evidence I have provided the Attorney General over the many passed months which include my 15
Lawyer Files and the 73 page letter to the Toronto Sun dated October 8 2006 which provides the
irrefutable evidence that the criminal act of fraud and the filing of false and misleading information were
committed in a building financed by the people for the purpose of administering justice to and for the
people of Ontario.
I am aware that the Ontario Rental Housing Tribunal, as they were called on June 30 2005 when the crimes
were committed, operates independent of the government as Hon.John Garretsen advised in his letter dated
September 6 2007 ( See pages 5 and 6 Lawyer File #3)
However the government set up the department and gave them the authority to deal with matters related to
the then, Tenant Protection Act, 1997 and Hon. John Garretsen, Minister of Municipal Affairs and Housing
was charged with the responsibility to monitor compliance with the
Tenant Protection Act, 1997
Duties of Minister
200. The Minister shall,

(a) monitor compliance with this Act;
(b) investigate cases of alleged failure to comply with this Act; and
(c) where the circumstances warrant, commence or cause to be commenced proceedings with respect to
alleged failures to comply with this Act. 1997, c. 24, s. 200.
There is nothing to argue in court.
169
Hon. John Gerretsen is derelict of his responsibility as is his mandate as the evidence clearly shows and
according to the “Role of the Attorney General” as stated on his web site he is responsible for
Constitutional matters regarding the administration of law in Ontario and more particularly is responsible
for the protection of the people’s rights and society as a whole.
According to his web site the Attorney General should have a comprehensive knowledge of the law
considering he advises and consults with everyone as the Chief Law Officer of the Executive
Council
He obviously plays a significant role in the administration of the Ontario Legal System and has rare
influential powers.
It appears to me that he has a better opportunity in his position to deal with the troubled state of the Legal
System than I.
He is financed by the people and has at his disposal all other personnel of the government financed by the
people to assist him in resolving the issues I have directed to his office.
It is absolutely absurd that he would pass the buck to me to finance an expedition to correct the issues
when his office has already been set up and financed by the people to see that the Ontario laws are
consistent with the Constitution Act, 1982 and the people are protected as guaranteed by the Charter.
It is more than a presumption that the various personnel would perform their duties consistent with the
Constitution with due regard for the individuals Charter rights for it is the supreme law of Canada.
It is either stated or implied that those people who accept positions in the employ of the government
financed by the people will perform their duties consistent with the Constitution and no position has more
authority and responsibility to that endeavor than the Attorney General as clearly stated on his web site.
The evidence shows clearly that the structured legal system and its personnel is not serving the people as
demanded by the Constitution and given the esteemed position of the Attorney General it is
incomprehensible to suggest that he is incoherent to the facts the evidence irrefutably shows and most
importantly that he of all people knows what ultimately must be done to rectify the errors of the modus
operandi presently in place which is incapable of backing the guarantee of the people’s Charter rights.
To not act constructively in his position which is afforded every opportunity to do so is pathetically absurd
and in fact infers that the Attorney General is not of the spirit of the Constitution and has no concerns for
the people of Ontario.
Given his influential powers it is more than just conceivable that he has no concerns that he would be held
accountable for his disrespect for the people and their rights for he knows the whole system is set up in
equal disrespect which makes it a futile effort for an individual to seek out the services of a lawyer to fight
an empire with endless resources provided by the people who are also influenced by his office and led to
believe wrongfully that he is their guardian.
The manner which the Attorney General has dealt with this individual is the same that he deals with every
individual who together make up the people of society who he is ultimately responsible to through the
legislature.
I am of the opinion you should go to the legislature and address the issues responsibly as per your “Role of
the Attorney General” as per your web site.
170
Failure to do so further supports that which I have alleged and will be where my attention is duly directed
if it is possible to acquire a lawyer prepared to assert the rights of the people above their own interests
which benefits greatly by supporting the views of the administration which is humongously detrimental to
the individual, society as a whole and the Constitution itself.
Nothing more than a thank you very much for bringing these serious matters to my attention regarding the
safety of the Canadian people and the protection of their rights and a commitment to amend the
deficiencies in the system to that endeavour will suffice.
You know full well that it is impossible for an individual to take on the challenge as you know the
challenge and responsibility is yours to commence or cause to commence proceedings which will deal with
the issues appropriately so as to be able to demonstrate due diligence in support of the peoples Charter
guarantee.
I will forward a copy of this letter along with the 15 Lawyer Files and my letter to the Toronto Sun dated
October 8 2006 which contains the irrefutable evidence as stated previously, to the puppet Ministry of
Community Safety and Correctional Services which is influenced by your office as is the Civilian
Commission on Police Services, the Ombudsman and the former ORHT.
This is a futile initiative as you are well aware considering the obvious intellect you must have of the
whole system but it will do more than serve your purpose to direct me to a Ferris wheel which goes round
and round until I tire or fall off.
Correspondence from them will be filed with the stack of evidence I already have which irrefutably proves
the extravagant waste of setting up these departments purportedly for the purpose of having the people
believe they are there to keep the government in check but in fact they are there to enhance the belief, not
actually keep the government in check.
How could they be anything else considering the government sets the .rules and guidelines providing them
the authority within they may act.
I highly doubt they are provided the authority to take the initiative when the government is found to be in
non compliance of the Constitution Act, 1982 in protection of the individuals guaranteed Charter rights.
It’s all an organized conspiracy against the people individually who do not have the wherewithal alone to
deal with such matters but are led to believe the whole system which they help to finance is tending to
these matters which puts them on the Ferris wheel somewhere on the planet which also goes round and
round clocking the days of futility.
Obviously you people are fully aware of that which I write and know full well the futility of the people
under your ingenious conspiracy which is in fact just the immoral consequences of human beings left
unattended to mind another’s pot of gold.
The system can not possibly be anything else considering it is infested with lawyers who have their
personal interests to attend to.
Obviously by the time laws are enacted they have met the approval of the special interest group, lawyers of
course whose business thrives due to their input.
171
The system must be a non profit group if the people are to actually enjoy there guaranteed Charter rights,
protected in accordance with the Constitution but obviously the system is designed by lawyers for their
benefit based on a charade to protect the people.
Reality holds the evidence which is everywhere and my evidence merely supports that which is fact about
the system.
I reiterate that I have sent the evidence to the Ontario Civilian Commission on Police Services on
November 15 2006 which purportedly had oversight of the policing services at the time.
Since I began my trek for justice back on June 30 2005 all I have observed is name changes.
The ORHT are now the Landlord Tenant Board, The Tenant Protection Act is something else which I
forget off hand and I presume the Ministry of Community Safety and Correctional Services replaces the
Civilian Commission on Police Services which must have taken considerable effort and cost to the people
in that endeavor but I have yet to see any realistic constructive effort towards the protection of the
individual in support of their guaranteed Charter rights.
Surely you are cognizant to the facts the evidence represents and the inadequacies of the system which
passes me around from department to department which have declined to act responsibly in a manner
conducive to the well being of society which the system personnel will adamantly state they are there for
the people.
Without further ado I will forward the Ministry of Community Safety and Correctional Services the
evidence at my further expense.
Having gone full circle a number of times I will forward you their foreseeable negative response
as conclusive evidence the system in place is incapable of demonstrating due diligence in support of the
individuals guaranteed Charter rights and in fact the evidence demonstrates a system which is designed for
and capable of doing nothing but deprive the people to support a system geared to benefit the upper class
creating a two tiered system which only the Upper Class can afford to benefit from.
Predictable is preventable and I have given you a prodigious amount of evidence which proves the
predictable and your consistent endeavors not to prevent them.
This is in complete conflict and contradiction with the Charter:
172
173
174
So, the Attorney Generals office finally does something and passes the buck to the Public Safety Division
which is satisfied that I have properly assessed the complaints systems available to me under the Ontario
Police Services Act, and every effort has been made to address my concerns.
There you have it from the office of the Public Safety Division that they are satisfied with
the system that allows Don Wilson my former tenant to walk into a building financed by the people to
administer justice in the legal system of the land to commit criminally fraudulent acts and file false and
misleading information which is an offense under the Tenant Protection Act, 1997 s. 206 (2) without
being brought before the courts to account for his crimes which is adverse to the well being of a moral
society demanded by the Constitution in pursuant of the individual’s guaranteed rights of protection.
Due to my persistent barrage of documentation to the Attorney General who is ultimately responsible to
the people through the legislature and who plays a prominent role in the legal system sends my
documentation to the Public Safety Division of the Ministry of Community Safety and Correctional
Services who he knows their limited powers will address the issues superfluously to the intent I have
written.
The fact remains that the system is incompetent to back the individual’s guaranteed Charter rights as my
evidence proves beyond any one’s reasonable perception of what is reasonable doubt and no effort has
been made to amend laws and policy so as to be conducive to the protection of the individual’s of society
The evidence is over whelming to this and there is nothing that any explanation or excuse from any
government body can write to satisfy my concerns.
Action to correct the policies and laws to atone to the spirit of the constitution consistent and capable to
back the individual’s guaranteed Charter rights is the only means to rectify the issues of my concerns.
I have quite enough evidence, thank you, that the spirit of the establishment personnel are not of the spirit
of the Constitution which is a humungous drag on the spirits of the individuals who are heavily burdened
with taxes to support a legal system operated by members of the Law Society of Upper Canada who has
admitted their members do not care about individuals rights and their only responsibility is to vigorously
advance the interests of those who people who can afford them.
175
For four years I have collected irrefutable evidence that the government legal system structured by the Law
Society propagates is inept to protect every individual as guaranteed with personnel unwilling to engage
themselves to the certainty that every individual is equally guaranteed as per the provisions of the Charter.
My MPP Julia Munro admits in her following letter dated August 16 2006 the Ombudsman is the final
level of appeal and does not see to whom I can take my case to other than the courts administered by the
same Attorney General that is responsible for the entire incompetent illegitimate legal system that cannot
and will not deal with the criminal crimes that were committed in their courts directing me to outside
agencies to pay for the administering and enforcing of justice that protects every individual as guaranteed,
myself.
Excuse me ASSHOLE Attorney General, but I do have the financial wherewithal to do it and more
importantly you do, not at all coincidental because that is what the taxpayer pays you for, damn it
According to the “Roles and Responsibilities of the Attorney General” he is responsible as “guardian of
the public interest” and responsible for all constitutional matters and the certainty that the legal system is
adept to the safety and wellbeing of every individual as guaranteed, yet unequivocally it is not as he
deliberately refuses to do his job, sending me to his criminal fraud and extortion people of the Law Society
that he administers the laws to congenial to the Law Society racket..
The Legal Aid system is another of his rackets whereas every individual is entitled to equal protection and
benefits of the law and the reports he has commissioned have informed him, which he just ignores as the
Society members ignore everything that is not favourable to them.
http://www.scribd.com/doc/13093424/Osgoode-Hall-Behind-It-All
176
177
[edit] Canada
In Canada, the Access to Information Act allows citizens to demand records from federal bodies. This is
enforced by the Information Commissioner of Canada. There is also a complementary Privacy Act,
introduced in 1983. The purpose of the Privacy Act is to extend the present laws of Canada that protect the
privacy of individuals with respect to personal information about themselves held by a federal government
institution and that provide individuals with a right of access to that information. It is a Crown copyright.
Complaints for possible violations of the Act may be reported to the Privacy Commissioner of Canada.
Canadian access to information laws distinguish between access to records generally and access to records
that contain personal information about the person making the request. Subject to exceptions, individuals
have a right of access to records that contain their own personal information under the Privacy Act but the
general public does not have a right of access to records that contain personal information about others
under the Access to Information Act.
Each province and territory in Canada has its own access to information legislation. in many cases, this is
also the provincial public sector privacy legislation. For example:
• Freedom of Information and Protection of Privacy Act (Alberta)

• Freedom of Information and Protection of Privacy Act (Manitoba)
• Freedom of Information and Protection of Privacy Act (Nova Scotia)
• Freedom of Information and Protection of Privacy Act (Ontario)
• Freedom of Information and Protection of Privacy Act (Saskatchewan)
• Act respecting access to documents held by public bodies and the protection of personal
information (Quebec)
From 1989 to 2008, requests made to the federal government were catalogued in the Coordination of
Access to Information Requests System.
A 393 page report released in September 2008, sponsored by several Canadian newspaper groups,
compares Canada’s Access to Information Act to the FOI laws of the provinces and of 68 other nations:
"Fallen Behind: Canada’s Access to Information Act in the World Context," at
www3.telus.net/index100/foi
178
The Information Commissioner investigates complaints from people
who believe they have been denied rights under the Access to
Information Act — Canada's freedom of information legislation. An
independent ombudsman appointed by Parliament, the Information
Commissioner has strong investigative powers and mediates between
dissatisfied applicants and government institutions.
As an ombudsman, the commissioner may not order a complaint

resolved in a particular way. Thus the commissioner relies on
persuasion to solve disputes, asking for a Federal Court review only if
an individual has been improperly denied access and a negotiated
solution has proved impossible.
Selection process for new Information Commissioner of Canada.
Following the retirement of Robert Marleau, a selection process for a

new permanent Information Commissioner is underway. For more
information, please see the following link.
Last Modified 2009-06-24 Important Notices
179
About the
Commissioner
Short Biography of
the Commissioner Contact Us / Inquiries
Where can I reach For general information, email or call:
the Commissioner?
Telephone: (613) 995-2410 (National Capital Region)
1-800-267-0441 (toll-free)
The switchboard is staffed Monday to Friday from
8:30 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. (Eastern Time Zone )
Fax: (613) 947-7294
Email: general@infocom.gc.ca
(Please note this is a regular e-mail transmission and

is not secure. It is intended for general enquiries
only. We do not accept formal complaints under the
Access to Information Act via e-mail. Also, because
the transmission is not secure, we do not
recommend its use for transmitting personal
information.)
If you wish to lodge a complaint, please write to:
Address: The Information Commissioner of Canada

Place de Ville, Tower B
112 Kent Street, 7th Floor
Ottawa, Ontario
K1A 1H3
Technical issues: webmaster@infocom.gc.ca
For technical issues, please contact the webmaster at

this e-mail address.
180
Last Modified 2009-05-01 Important Notices
181

Freedom of Information Request Registered Mail

Uploaded by

Document Information

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Freedom of Information Request Registered Mail

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

http://www.scribd.

You can lead a horse to water, but cannot make it drink

It is reality that attests and begs the question

Democracy: social equality, equality, egalitarianism

Simplicity: Ease, straightforwardness, effortless, plainness, minimalism, unfussiness, cleanness

“2o bucks says we can have a True Democracy” 1 LIFE initiative.

112 Kent Street, 7th Floor

Ottawa, Ontario Frank Gallagher

This document sent by registered mail is published on my Scribd site http://www.scribd.com/documents as

signed October 15 2009 9

Excerpt from page 4 follows

False statements are underlined

1) Complaint date November 7 2007 in error (False-November 8 2007)

Commission for Public Complaints Against the RCMP

Reviews & Investigations Unit

E-MAIL ADDRESS: reviews@cpc-cpp.gc.ca

From: Frank Gallagher [mailto:frank.gallagher@sympatico.ca]

September 23 2008 Frank Gallagher

Re: Request Review of my Complaint

Dear Commission Representative

Police Services Act

Address of contents of Superintendent Robert Davis dated September 3 2008

False statements are underlined

1) Complaint date November 7 2007 in error (False-November 8 2007)

Police Services Act

2) If I wish to exercise my right to a review of this investigation of my complaint I may do so by

Of course I wish to exercise my right!!!

From : Michael Thomson <Michael.Thomson@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>

Dear Mr. Gallagher:

M.J. Thomson, Sgt.

From: Frank Gallagher [mailto:frank.gallagher@sympatico.ca]

September 18, 2008

From: Frank Gallagher [mailto:frank.gallagher@sympatico.ca]

Attention Andree Leduc

Re: Request Review of Complaint

Dear Andree Leduc

Please acknowledge receipt and your intent to cooperate

Confucius 551 BC – 479 BC

Frank 1942 AD – 200_

Manager, Charter Democracy Force

CONSISTENCY to evade the purpose of truth

When ones mandate is to meet with a person

Due diligence to a purpose when the safety

Police Services Act

Reality is the truth impervious to perception yet precisely due to perception

Simple fact is it will betray you.

OOPS: They are in serious trouble aren’t they?

Don’t answer, we know don’t we?

I suppose the obvious does not require the formality.

We cannot have that can we?

Re: File Nos. PC-2007-2316 & PC-2007-2317

Greedy and the Needy

Where does poverty come from?

Reality is the truth impervious to perception yet precisely due to perception

The Ideal is just Reality sanely dealt with

What is the status quo?

“Recompense injury with justice and recompense kindness with kindness”

Alexander Pope 1688 -1744

Ignorance our Albatross

How many less persecuted, victims and hopelessness and despair?

On October 7 2008 I e-mailed the Reviews section in response to their letter of

This document “ReviewsRCMPComplaintsOctober42008” is published on the

Reality is the truth impervious to perception yet precisely due to perception

www.cdf.name PUBLIC INQUIRY NOW!!!!