ST.

AMATIEL TECHNOLOGICAL INSTITUTE

Malolos, City Bulacan

Research

In

COMMUNICATION SKILLS II

ABORTION

Submitted by :

MAILYN D ALTIEZO

LYRA (diko alam apelyido)

Submitted to :

MS.MERCEDITA B. ROBLES

TABLE OF CONTENTS ABORTION

1 Types

• 1.1 Spontaneous
• 1.2 Induced

2 Methods

• 2.1 Medical
• 2.2 Surgical
• 2.3 Other methods

3 Health risks

• 3.1 Physical health

• 3.2 Mental health

4 Incidence

• 4.1 By gestational age and method

• 4.2 By personal and social factors
• 4.3 Unsafe abortion

5 History

6 Society and culture

• 6.1 Abortion debate

• 6.2 Abortion law
• 6.3 Sex-selective
• 6.4 Anti-abortion violence
introduction

Abortion is the termination of a pregnancy by the removal or expulsion of a fetus or embryo

from the uterus, resulting in or caused by its death.[1] An abortion can occur spontaneously due to
complications during pregnancy or can be induced, in humans and other species. In the context
of human pregnancies, an abortion induced to preserve the health of the gravida (pregnant
female) is termed a therapeutic abortion, while an abortion induced for any other reason is
termed an elective abortion. The term abortion most commonly refers to the induced abortion of
a human pregnancy, while spontaneous abortions are usually termed miscarriages.

Abortion has a low risk of maternal mortality except for abortions performed unsafely, which
result in 70,000 deaths and 5 million disabilities per year. Abortions are unsafe when performed
by persons without the proper skills or outside of a medically safe environment. An estimated 42
million abortions are performed annually with 20 million of those abortions done unsafely. Forty
percent of the world's women are able to access therapeutic and elective abortions within
gestational limits.

Abortion has a long history and has been induced by various methods including herbal
abortifacients, the use of sharpened tools, physical trauma, and other traditional methods.
Contemporary medicine utilizes medications and surgical procedures to induce abortion. The
legality, prevalence, cultural, and religious views on abortion vary substantially around the
world. In many parts of the world there is prominent and divisive public controversy over the
ethical and legal issues of abortion. Abortion and abortion-related issues feature prominently in
the national politics in many nations, often involving the opposing pro-life and pro-choice
worldwide social movements (both self-named). Incidence of abortion has declined worldwide,
as access to family planning education and contraceptive services has increased.

BODY

Types
A 10-week-old fetus removed via a therapeutic abortion from a 44-year-old woman diagnosed
with early-stage uterine cancer. The uterus (womb), included the fetus.

Spontaneous

Spontaneous abortion (also known as miscarriage) is the expulsion of an embryo or fetus due to
accidental trauma or natural causes before approximately the 22nd week of gestation; the
definition by gestational age varies by country. Most miscarriages are due to incorrect replication
of chromosomes; they can also be caused by environmental factors. A pregnancy that ends
before 37 weeks of gestation resulting in a live-born infant is known as a "premature birth".
When a fetus dies in utero after about 22 weeks, or during delivery, it is usually termed
"stillborn". Premature births and stillbirths are generally not considered to be miscarriages
although usage of these terms can sometimes overlap.

Between 10% and 50% of pregnancies end in clinically apparent miscarriage, depending upon
the age and health of the pregnant woman. Most miscarriages occur very early in pregnancy, in
most cases, they occur so early in the pregnancy that the woman is not even aware that she was
pregnant. One study testing hormones for ovulation and pregnancy found that 61.9% of
conceptuses were lost prior to 12 weeks, and 91.7% of these losses occurred subclinically,
without the knowledge of the once pregnant woman.

The risk of spontaneous abortion decreases sharply after the 10th week from the last menstrual
period (LMP). One study of 232 pregnant women showed "virtually complete [pregnancy loss]
by the end of the embryonic period" (10 weeks LMP) with a pregnancy loss rate of only 2
percent after 8.5 weeks LMP.

The most common cause of spontaneous abortion during the first trimester is chromosomal
abnormalities of the embryo/fetus,[10] accounting for at least 50% of sampled early pregnancy
losses Other causes include vascular disease (such as lupus), diabetes, other hormonal problems,
infection, and abnormalities of the uterus.[10] Advancing maternal age and a patient history of
previous spontaneous abortions are the two leading factors associated with a greater risk of
spontaneous abortion. A spontaneous abortion can also be caused by accidental trauma;
intentional trauma or stress to cause miscarriage is considered induced abortion or feticide.

Induced

A pregnancy can be intentionally aborted in many ways. The manner selected depends chiefly
upon the gestational age of the embryo or fetus, which increases in size as the pregnancy
progresses. Specific procedures may also be selected due to legality, regional availability, and
doctor-patient preference. Reasons for procuring induced abortions are typically characterized as
either therapeutic or elective. An abortion is medically referred to as a therapeutic abortion when
it is performed to:

• save the life of the pregnant woman;

• preserve the woman's physical or mental health;
 • terminate pregnancy that would result in a child born with a congenital disorder that
would be fatal or associated with significant morbidity; or
• selectively reduce the number of fetuses to lessen health risks associated with multiple
pregnancy.

An abortion is referred to as elective when it is performed at the request of the woman "for
reasons other than maternal health or fetal disease."

Methods

Gestational age may determine which abortion methods are practiced.

Medical

"Medical abortions" are non-surgical abortions that use pharmaceutical drugs. As of 2005,
medical abortions constitute 13% of all abortions in the United States. Combined regimens
include methotrexate or mifepristone, followed by a prostaglandin (either misoprostol or
gemeprost: misoprostol is used in the U.S.; gemeprost is used in the UK and Sweden.) When
used within 49 days gestation, approximately 92% of women undergoing medical abortion with a
combined regimen completed it without surgical intervention. Misoprostol can be used alone, but
has a lower efficacy rate than combined regimens. In cases of failure of medical abortion,
vacuum or manual aspiration is used to complete the abortion surgically.

Surgical

A vacuum aspiration abortion at eight weeks gestational age (six weeks after fertilization).
1: Amniotic sac
2: Embryo
3: Uterine lining
4: Speculum
5: Vacurette
6: Attached to a suction pump

In the first 12 weeks, suction-aspiration or vacuum abortion is the most common method.
Manual vacuum aspiration (MVA) abortion consists of removing the fetus or embryo, placenta
and membranes by suction using a manual syringe, while electric vacuum aspiration (EVA)
abortion uses an electric pump. These techniques are comparable, and differ in the mechanism
used to apply suction, how early in pregnancy they can be used, and whether cervical dilation is
necessary. MVA, also known as "mini-suction" and "menstrual extraction", can be used in very
early pregnancy, and does not require cervical dilation. Surgical techniques are sometimes
referred to as 'Suction (or surgical) Termination Of Pregnancy' (STOP). From the 15th week
until approximately the 26th, dilation and evacuation (D&E) is used. D&E consists of opening
the cervix of the uterus and emptying it using surgical instruments and suction.

Dilation and curettage (D&C), the second most common method of surgical abortion, is a
standard gynecological procedure performed for a variety of reasons, including examination of
the uterine lining for possible malignancy, investigation of abnormal bleeding, and abortion.
Curettage refers to cleaning the walls of the uterus with a curette. The World Health
Organization recommends this procedure, also called sharp curettage, only when MVA is
unavailable.

Other techniques must be used to induce abortion in the second trimester. Premature delivery can
be induced with prostaglandin; this can be coupled with injecting the amniotic fluid with
hypertonic solutions containing saline or urea. After the 16th week of gestation, abortions can be
induced by intact dilation and extraction (IDX) (also called intrauterine cranial decompression),
which requires surgical decompression of the fetus's head before evacuation. IDX is sometimes
called "partial-birth abortion," which has been federally banned in the United States. A
hysterotomy abortion is a procedure similar to a caesarean section and is performed under
general anesthesia. It requires a smaller incision than a caesarean section and is used during later
stages of pregnancy.

The Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists has recommended that an injection be
used to stop the fetal heart during the first phase of the surgical abortion procedure to ensure that
the fetus is not born alive.

Other methods
Bas-relief at Angkor Wat, Cambodia, c. 1150, depicting a demon inducing an abortion by
pounding the abdomen of a pregnant woman with a pestle.

Historically, a number of herbs reputed to possess abortifacient properties have been used in folk
medicine: tansy, pennyroyal, black cohosh, and the now-extinct silphium (see history of
abortion). The use of herbs in such a manner can cause serious—even lethal—side effects, such
as multiple organ failure, and is not recommended by physicians.

Abortion is sometimes attempted by causing trauma to the abdomen. The degree of force, if
severe, can cause serious internal injuries without necessarily succeeding in inducing
miscarriage. Both accidental and deliberate abortions of this kind can be subject to criminal
liability in many countries. In Southeast Asia, there is an ancient tradition of attempting abortion
through forceful abdominal massage. One of the bas reliefs decorating the temple of Angkor Wat
in Cambodia depicts a demon performing such an abortion upon a woman who has been sent to
the underworld.

Reported methods of unsafe, self-induced abortion include misuse of misoprostol, and insertion
of non-surgical implements such as knitting needles and clothes hangers into the uterus. These
methods are rarely seen in developed countries where surgical abortion is legal and available.

Health risks
Abortion, when legally performed in developed countries, is among the safest procedures in
medicine. In such settings, risk of maternal death is between 0.2–1.2 per 100,000 procedures. In
comparison, by 1996, mortality from childbirth in developed countries was 11 times greater.
Unsafe abortions (defined by the World Health Organization as those performed by unskilled
individuals, with hazardous equipment, or in unsanitary facilities) carry a high risk of maternal
death and other complications. For unsafe procedures, the mortality rate has been estimated at
367 per 100,000 (70,000 women per year worldwide).

Physical health

Surgical abortion methods, like most minimally invasive procedures, carry a small potential for
serious complications.
Surgical abortion is generally safe and the rate of major complications is low but varies
depending on how far pregnancy has progressed and the surgical method used.Concerning
gestational age, incidence of major complications is highest after 20 weeks of gestation and
lowest before the 8th week. With more advanced gestation there is a higher risk of uterine
perforation and retained products of conception and specific procedures like dilation and
evacuation may be required.

Concerning the methods used, general incidence of major complications for surgical abortion
varies from lower for suction curettage, to higher for saline instillation.Possible complications
include hemorrhage, incomplete abortion, uterine or pelvic infection, ongoing intrauterine
pregnancy, misdiagnosed/unrecognized ectopic pregnancy, hematometra (in the uterus), uterine
perforation and cervical laceration. Use of general anesthesia increases the risk of complications
because it relaxes uterine musculature making it easier to perforate.

Women who have uterine anomalies, leiomyomas or had previous difficult first-trimester
abortion are contraindicated to undertake surgical abortion unless ultrasonography is
immediately available and the surgeon is experienced in its intraoperative use.Abortion does not
impair subsequent pregnancies, nor does it increase the risk of future premature births, infertility,
ectopic pregnancy, or miscarriage.

In the first trimester, health risks associated with medical abortion are generally considered no
greater than for surgical abortion.

Although some epidemiological studies suggest an abortion – breast cancer hypothesis, the
World Health Organization has concluded that there is "no consistent effect of first trimester
induced abortion upon a woman's risk of breast cancer later in life".The National Cancer
Institute,The American Congress of Obstetricians and Gynecologists,[53] the Royal College of
Obstetricians and Gynaecologists, and other major medical bodies have also concluded that
abortion does not cause breast cancer.

Mental health

No scientific research has demonstrated that abortion is a cause of poor mental health in the
general population. However there are groups of women who may be at higher risk of coping
with problems and distress following abortion. Some factors in a woman's life, such as emotional
attachment to the pregnancy, lack of social support, pre-existing psychiatric illness, and
conservative views on abortion increase the likelihood of experiencing negative feelings after an
abortion. The American Psychological Association (APA) concluded that abortion does not lead
to increased mental health problems.

Some proposed negative psychological effects of abortion have been referred to by pro-life
advocates as a separate condition called "post-abortion syndrome." However, the existence of
"post-abortion syndrome" is not recognized by any medical or psychological organization.
A January 2011 study in the New England Journal of Medicine concludes that women who have
had a first-trimester abortion are no more likely to seek psychiatric care after the procedure than
before -- but the risk of a mental health problem increases if the woman gives birth.

Incidence
There are two commonly used methods of measuring incidence of abortion:

• Abortion rate - number of abortions per 1000 women between 15 and 44 years of age
• Abortion ratio - number of abortions out of 100 known pregnancies (excluding
miscarriages and stillbirths)

The number of abortions performed worldwide has decreased between 1995 and 2003 from
45.6 million to 41.6 million, which means a decrease in abortion rate from 35 to 29 per 1000
women. The greatest decrease has occurred in the developed world with a drop from 39 to 26 per
1000 women in comparison to the developing world, which had a decrease from 34 to 29 per
1000 women. Out of a total of about 42 million abortions 22 million occurred safely and 20
million unsafely.

On average, the frequency of abortions is similar in developing countries (where abortion is

generally restricted) to the frequency in developed countries (where abortion is generally much
less restricted).Abortion rates are very difficult to measure in locations where those abortions are
illegal, and pro-life groups have criticized researchers for allegedly jumping to conclusions about
those numbers.According to the Guttmacher Institute and the United Nations Population Fund,
the abortion rate in developing countries is largely attributable to lack of access to modern
contraceptives; assuming no change in abortion laws, providing that access to contraceptives
would result in about 25 million fewer abortions annually, including almost 15 million fewer
unsafe abortions.

The incidence of induced abortion varies regionally. Some countries, such as Belgium (11.2 out
of 100 known pregnancies) and the Netherlands (10.6 per 100), had a comparatively low ratio of
induced abortion. Others like Russia (62.6 out of 100), Romania (63 out of 100) and Vietnam
(43.7 out of 100) had a high ratio (data for last three countries of unknown completeness). The
estimated world ratio was 26%, the world rate - 35 per 1000 women.

By gestational age and method

Histogram of abortions by gestational age in England and
Wales during 2004. Average is 9.5 weeks. (left) Abortion in
the United States by gestational age, 2004. (Data source:
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention) (right)

Abortion rates also vary depending on the stage of pregnancy and the method practiced. In 2003,
from data collected in those areas of the United States that sufficiently reported gestational age, it
was found that 88.2% of abortions were conducted at or prior to 12 weeks, 10.4% from 13 to 20
weeks, and 1.4% at or after 21 weeks. 90.9% of these were classified as having been done by
"curettage" (suction-aspiration, Dilation and curettage, Dilation and evacuation), 7.7% by
"medical" means (mifepristone), 0.4% by "intrauterine instillation" (saline or prostaglandin), and
1.0% by "other" (including hysterotomy and hysterectomy).The Guttmacher Institute estimated
there were 2,200 intact dilation and extraction procedures in the U.S. during 2000; this accounts
for 0.17% of the total number of abortions performed that year.Similarly, in England and Wales
in 2006, 89% of terminations occurred at or under 12 weeks, 9% between 13 to 19 weeks, and
1.5% at or over 20 weeks. 64% of those reported were by vacuum aspiration, 6% by D&E, and
30% were medicalLater abortions are more common in China, India, and other developing
countries than in developed countries.

By personal and social factors

A bar chart depicting selected data from the 1998 AGI meta-study on the reasons women stated
for having an abortion.

A 1998 aggregated study, from 27 countries, on the reasons women seek to terminate their
pregnancies concluded that common factors cited to have influenced the abortion decision were:
desire to delay or end childbearing, concern over the interruption of work or education, issues of
financial or relationship stability, and perceived immaturity.A 2004 study in which American
women at clinics answered a questionnaire yielded similar results.In Finland and the United
States, concern for the health risks posed by pregnancy in individual cases was not a factor
commonly given; however, in Bangladesh, India, and Kenya health concerns were cited by
women more frequently as reasons for having an abortion.1% of women in the 2004 survey-
based U.S. study became pregnant as a result of rape and 0.5% as a result of incest.Another
American study in 2002 concluded that 54% of women who had an abortion were using a form
of contraception at the time of becoming pregnant while 46% were not. Inconsistent use was
reported by 49% of those using condoms and 76% of those using the combined oral
contraceptive pill; 42% of those using condoms reported failure through slipping or
breakage.The Guttmacher Institute estimated that "most abortions in the United States are
obtained by minority women" because minority women "have much higher rates of unintended
pregnancy."
Some abortions are undergone as the result of societal pressures. These might include the
stigmatization of disabled people, preference for children of a specific sex, disapproval of single
motherhood, insufficient economic support for families, lack of access to or rejection of
contraceptive methods, or efforts toward population control (such as China's one-child policy).
These factors can sometimes result in compulsory abortion or sex-selective abortion.

Unsafe abortion

Soviet poster circa 1925, warning against midwives performing abortions. Title translation:
"Abortions performed by either trained or self-taught midwives not only maim the woman, they
also often lead to death."
Main article: Unsafe abortion

One of the main determinants of the availability of safe abortions is the legality of the procedure.
Forty percent of the world's women are able to access therapeutic and elective abortions within
gestational limits. Women seeking to terminate their pregnancies sometimes resort to unsafe
methods, particularly where and when access to legal abortion is restricted. The World Health
Organization (WHO) defines an unsafe abortion as being "a procedure ... carried out by persons
lacking the necessary skills or in an environment that does not conform to minimal medical
standards, or both."Unsafe abortions are sometimes known colloquially as "back-alley"
abortions. They may be performed by the woman herself, another person without medical
training, or a professional health provider operating in sub-standard conditions. Unsafe abortion
remains a public health concern due to the higher incidence and severity of its associated
complications, such as incomplete abortion, sepsis, hemorrhage, and damage to internal organs.
While maternal mortality seldom results from safe abortions, unsafe abortions result in 70,000
deaths and 5 million disabilities per year.Complications of unsafe abortion are said to account,
globally, for approximately 13% of all maternal mortalities, with regional estimates including
12% in Asia, 25% in Latin America, and 13% in sub-Saharan Africa.Although the global rate of
abortion declined from 45.6 million in 1995 to 41.6 million in 2003, unsafe procedures still
accounted for 48% of all abortions performed in 2003.Health education, access to family
planning, and improvements in health care during and after abortion have been proposed to
address this phenomenon.

History
"French Periodical Pills." An example of a clandestine advertisement published in an 1845
edition of the Boston Daily Times.
Main article: History of abortion

Induced abortion can be traced to ancient times.There is evidence to suggest that, historically,
pregnancies were terminated through a number of methods, including the administration of
abortifacient herbs, the use of sharpened implements, the application of abdominal pressure, and
other techniques.

The Hippocratic Oath, the chief statement of medical ethics for Hippocratic physicians in
Ancient Greece, forbade doctors from helping to procure an abortion by pessary. Soranus, a 2nd-
century Greek physician, suggested in his work Gynaecology that women wishing to abort their
pregnancies should engage in energetic exercise, energetic jumping, carrying heavy objects, and
riding animals. He also prescribed a number of recipes for herbal baths, pessaries, and
bloodletting, but advised against the use of sharp instruments to induce miscarriage due to the
risk of organ perforation. It is also believed that, in addition to using it as a contraceptive, the
ancient Greeks relied upon silphium as an abortifacient. Such folk remedies, however, varied in
effectiveness and were not without risk. Tansy and pennyroyal, for example, are two poisonous
herbs with serious side effects that have at times been used to terminate pregnancy.

During the Islamic Golden Age, physicians there documented detailed and extensive lists of birth
control practices commenting on their effectiveness and prevalence. They listed many different
birth control substances in their medical encyclopedias, such as Avicenna's list of twenty in The
Canon of Medicine (1025 CE) and Muhammad ibn Zakariya ar-Razi's list of 176 substances in
his Hawi (10th century CE) This was "unparalleled in European medicine until the 19th
century".

During the Middle Ages, abortion was toleratedand there were no laws against it.A medieval
female physician, Trotula of Salerno,[85] administered a number of remedies for the “retention of
menstrua,” which was sometimes a code for early abortifacients. Pope Sixtus V (1585–90) is
noted as the first Pope to declare that abortion is homicide regardless of the stage of
pregnancy.Abortion in the 19th century continued, despite bans in both the United Kingdom and
the United States, as the disguised, but nonetheless open, advertisement of services in the
Victorian era suggests.

In the 20th century the Soviet Union (1919), Iceland (1935) and Sweden (1938) were among the
first countries to legalize certain or all forms of abortion. In 1935 Nazi Germany, a law was
passed permitting abortions for those deemed "hereditarily ill," while women considered of
German stock were specifically prohibited from having abortions.

However, the procedure remained relatively rare until the late 1960s. In late 1960s and early
1970s, due to a confluence of factors, the number of abortions exploded worldwide. In West
Germany, the number of reported abortions spiked from 2,800 in 1968 to 87,702 in 1980.In the
United States, some sources show an even greater increase, from 4,600 in 1968 to 1.5 million in
1980. However, the fact that abortion remained illegal in many states prior to the landmark 1973
decision of Roe v. Wade may have affected the number of reported abortions prior to 1973.

Society and culture

Abortion debate

Pro-choice activists near the Washington Monument at the

March for Women's Lives in 2004. (left) Pro-life activists near
the Washington Monument at the annual 2009 March for Life
in Washington, DC. (right)

In the history of abortion, induced abortion has been the source of considerable debate,
controversy, and activism. An individual's position on the complex ethical, moral, philosophical,
biological, and legal issues is often related to his or her value system. The main positions are one
that argues in favor of access to abortion and one argues against access to abortion. Opinions of
abortion may be described as being a combination of beliefs on its morality, and beliefs on the
responsibility, ethical scope, and proper extent of governmental authorities in public policy.
Religious ethics also has an influence upon both personal opinion and the greater debate over
abortion (see religion and abortion).
Abortion debates, especially pertaining to abortion laws, are often spearheaded by groups
advocating one of these two positions. In the United States, those in favor of greater legal
restrictions on, or even complete prohibition of abortion, most often describe themselves as pro-
life while those against legal restrictions on abortion describe themselves as pro-choice.
Generally, the former position argues that a human fetus is a human being with a right to live
making abortion tantamount to murder. The latter position argues that a woman has certain
reproductive rights, especially the choice whether or not to carry a pregnancy to term.

In both public and private debate, arguments presented in favor of or against abortion access
focus on either the moral permissibility of an induced abortion, or justification of laws permitting
or restricting abortion.

Debate also focuses on whether the pregnant woman should have to notify and/or have the
consent of others in distinct cases: a minor, her parents; a legally married or common-law wife,
her husband; or, for any case, the biological father. In a 2003 Gallup poll in the United States,
79% of male and 67% of female respondents were in favor of legalized mandatory spousal
notification; overall support was 72% with 26% opposed.

Abortion law

The examples and perspective in this article may not represent a worldwide view of the
subject

International status of abortion law:

Legal on request
Illegal with exception for rape, maternal life, health, mental health, fetal defects, and/or
socioeconomic factors
Illegal with exception for rape, maternal life, health, mental health, and/or fetal defects
Illegal with exception for rape, maternal life, health, and/or mental health
Illegal with exception for maternal life, health, and/or mental health
Illegal with no exceptions
Varies by region
No information

The earliest secular laws regulating abortion reflect a concern with class and caste purity and
preservation of male prerogatives. Abortion as such was not outlawed, but wives who procured
abortions without their husband's knowledge could be severely punished, as could slaves who
induced abortions in highborn women. Generally, abortions prior to quickening were treated as
minor crimes, if at all.
The new philosophies of the Axial Age, which began discussing the nature and value of human
life in abstract terms, had little impact on existing abortion laws. Even the Christian ecclesiastical
courts of the Middle Ages imposed penance and no corporal punishment for abortion, and
retained the pre- and post-quickening distinction from the ancient philosophies.

With the sole exception of Bracton, commentators on the English common law formulated the
born alive rule, excluding feticide from homicide law, using language dating back to the Leges
Henrici Primi.

In the late 18th century, it was claimed that scientific knowledge of human development
beginning at fertilization,justified stricter abortion laws. This was part of a larger struggle on the
part of the medical profession to distinguish modern, theory based medicine from traditional,
empirically based medicine, including midwifery and herbalism.

Both pre- and post-quickening abortions were criminalized by Lord Ellenborough's Act in
1803.In 1861, the Parliament of the United Kingdom passed the Offences against the Person Act
1861, which continued to outlaw abortion and served as a model for similar prohibitions in some
other nations.

The Soviet Union, with legislation in 1920, and Iceland, with legislation in 1935, were two of the
first countries to generally allow abortion. The second half of the 20th century saw the
liberalization of abortion laws in other countries. The Abortion Act 1967 allowed abortion for
limited reasons in the United Kingdom (except Northern Ireland). In the 1973 case, Roe v. Wade,
the United States Supreme Court struck down state laws banning abortion, ruling that such laws
violated an implied right to privacy in the United States Constitution. The Supreme Court of
Canada, similarly, in the case of R. v. Morgentaler, discarded its criminal code regarding
abortion in 1988, after ruling that such restrictions violated the security of person guaranteed to
women under the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms.Canada later struck down
provincial regulations of abortion in the case of R. v. Morgentaler (1993). By contrast, abortion
in Ireland was affected by the addition of an amendment to the Irish Constitution in 1983 by
popular referendum, recognizing "the right to life of the unborn".

Current laws pertaining to abortion are diverse. Religious, moral, and cultural sensibilities
continue to influence abortion laws throughout the world. The right to life, the right to liberty,
the right to security of person, and the right to reproductive health are major issues of human
rights that are sometimes used as justification for the existence or absence of laws controlling
abortion. Many countries in which abortion is legal require that certain criteria be met in order
for an abortion to be obtained, often, but not always, using a trimester-based system to regulate
the window of legality:

• In the United States, some states impose a 24-hour waiting period before the procedure,
prescribe the distribution of information on fetal development, or require that parents be
contacted if their minor daughter requests an abortion.
• In the United Kingdom, as in some other countries, two doctors must first certify that an
abortion is medically or socially necessary before it can be performed.
Other countries, in which abortion is normally illegal, will allow one to be performed in the case
of rape, incest, or danger to the pregnant woman's life or health.

• A few nations ban abortion entirely: Chile, El Salvador, Malta, and Nicaragua, with
consequent rises in maternal death directly and indirectly due to pregnancy.However, in
2006, the Chilean government began the free distribution of emergency contraception.
• In Bangladesh, abortion is illegal, but the government has long supported a network of
"menstrual regulation clinics", where menstrual extraction (manual vacuum aspiration)
can be performed as menstrual hygiene.

In places where abortion is illegal or carries heavy social stigma, pregnant women may engage in
medical tourism and travel to countries where they can terminate their pregnancies. Women
without the means to travel can resort to providers of illegal abortions or try to do it themselves.

In the US, about 8% of abortions are performed on women who travel from another
state.However, that is driven at least partly by differing limits on abortion according to
gestational age or the scarcity of doctors trained and willing to do later abortionsThousands of
women every year travel from Northern Ireland, the Republic of Ireland, Poland, and other
countries where elective abortion is illegal, to Britain or other countries with less restrictive laws,
in order to obtain abortions.

In the United States and some Canadian localities, it is a legal offense to obstruct access to a
clinic or doctor's office where abortions are performed. "Buffer zones," regulating how close
protesters can come to the clinic or to the patients, may exist.

Other issues in abortion law may include the requirement that a minor obtain the consent of one
or both parents to the abortion or that she notify one or both parents, the requirement that a
woman obtain the consent of her husband to the abortion and the question of whether the fetus's
father can prohibit an abortion, the requirement that abortion providers inform patients of the
supposed health risks of the procedure, and wrongful birth laws.

Sex-selective

Sonography and amniocentesis allow parents to determine sex before childbirth. The
development of this technology has led to sex-selective abortion, or the targeted termination of
female fetuses.

It is suggested that sex-selective abortion might be partially responsible for the noticeable
disparities between the birth rates of male and female children in some places. The preference for
male children is reported in many areas of Asia, and abortion used to limit female births has been
reported in China, Taiwan, South Korea, and India.

In India, the economic role of men, the costs associated with dowries, and a common Indian
tradition which dictates that funeral rites must be performed by a male relative have led to a
cultural preference for sons. The widespread availability of diagnostic testing, during the 1970s
and '80s, led to advertisements for services which read, "Invest 500 rupees [for a sex test] now,
save 50,000 rupees [for a dowry] later." In 1991, the male-to-female sex ratio in India was
skewed from its biological norm of 105 to 100, to an average of 108 to 100.Researchers have
asserted that between 1985 and 2005 as many as 10 million female fetuses may have been
selectively aborted.The Indian government passed an official ban of pre-natal sex screening in
1994 and moved to pass a complete ban of sex-selective abortion in 2002.

In the People's Republic of China, there is also a historic son preference. The implementation of
the one-child policy in 1979, in response to population concerns, led to an increased disparity in
the sex ratio as parents attempted to circumvent the law through sex-selective abortion or the
abandonment of unwanted daughters.Sex-selective abortion might be an influence on the shift
from the baseline male-to-female birth rate to an elevated national rate of 117:100 reported in
2002. The trend was more pronounced in rural regions: as high as 130:100 in Guangdong and
135:100 in Hainan.A ban upon the practice of sex-selective abortion was enacted in 2003.

Anti-abortion violence

Doctors and facilities that provide abortion have been subjected to various forms of violence,
including murder, attempted murder, kidnapping, stalking, assault, arson, and bombing. Anti-
abortion violence has been classified by governmental and scholarly sources as terrorism.Only a
small fraction of those opposed to abortion commit violence, often rationalizing their actions as
justifiable homicide or defense of others, committed in order to protect the lives of fetuses.

In the United States, four abortion providers—Drs. David Gunn, John Britton, Barnett Slepian,
and George Tiller—have been assassinated. Attempted assassinations have also taken place in
the United States and Canada, and other personnel at abortion clinics, including receptionists and
security guards, have been killed in the United States and Australia. Hundreds of bombings,
arsons, acid attacks, invasions, and incidents of vandalism against abortion providers have also
occurred.Notable perpetrators of anti-abortion violence include Eric Robert Rudolph, Scott
Roeder, Shelley Shannon, and Paul Jennings Hill, the first person to be executed in the United
States for murdering an abortion provider.

CONCLUSION OF ABORTION

In our society, there are many ethical dilemmas that we are faced with that are
virtually impossible to solve. One of the most difficult and controversial issues that
we are faced with is abortion. There are many strong arguments both for and
against the right to have an abortion which are so complicated that it becomes
impossible to resolve. The complexity of this issue lies in the different aspects of the
argument. The essence of a person, rights, and who is entitled to these rights, are a
few of the many aspects which are very difficult to define. There are also issues of
what circumstances would justify abortion. Because the issue of abortion is virtually
impossible to solve, all one can hope to do is understand the different aspects of the
argument so that if he or she is faced with that issue in their own lives, they would
be able to make educated and thoughtful decisions in dealing with it. The definition
of a person is an aspect of the abortion issue which raises some very difficult
questions. Is an unborn baby a person? When does the unborn baby become a
person? This is a difficult question because in order for one to answer it, he must
define the essence of a person. When describing the essence of something, one
needs to describe the necessary and sufficient conditions of that thing. So how does
one define the essence of a person? Kant describes a person as a rational being.
Some people define the essence of a person from more of a biological standpoint.
Nevertheless, defining the essence of a person is a very difficult thing for a group of
people to agree on. One’s own definition of a person would most likely greatly
impact his opinion on whether abortion is morally justified or not. This becomes
even more complicated when one takes into account potentiality. This raises the
question of whether the fetus is an actual person or a potential person. Many would
argue that a fetus is a potential person because it is has the potential to become
what it is not yet. However, does a potential person have potential rights? An
example was used: does a potential doctor have the rights of a licensed doctor?
When one is describing potentiality, All he is really describing is what that thing is
not. By declaring that a fetus is a potential person, one is also stating that a fetus is
not a person. As one can see, this issue of the essence of a person and whether a
fetus is a person is a very complicated one. This becomes seven more complicated
if one takes into account the issue of rights. Now, the concept of human rights, that
is to say, what American society dictates as human rights, conflicts heavily with
itself. On one hand, we form a deep and heavy opinion on one’s right to life. On the
other, we hold an equally strong opinion on one’s freedom to live that life as they
please. American society by and large has a firm belief in an individuals right to live.
Therefore, if one comes to the conclusion that a fetus actually is a person, then that
fetus should receive the protection to it’s right to live, as much as you or I. This
society also holds the firm belief in one’s right to the sovereignty of his or her own
body, equal to that of one’s right to live. In this case, it is imperative that we
understand what liberties we can and cannot take upon ourselves concerning our
lives. Case in point, suicide. Society dictates what we are allowed to do, and how we
are allowed to live, by law. Most of American laws are written to preserve one’s
rights to individuality, and one’s right to take the liberty to live their lives as they
see fit. However, laws are also written to undermine those who’s actions
compromise the liberties and freedoms of other individuals, thus protecting the
concepts and ideals of agency and liberty. Based on our society’s laws, essentially,
we believe that what you do to yourself is your choice, and is accepted by law, so
long as it doesn’t stop or impede the lives and freedoms of others. The difficulty in
this dilemma lies within the question of whether an abortion falls into a category of
protection of a woman’s right’s over the sovereignty of her own body, or whether it
falls into a different category of an action which is not permissible because,
according to some people, the fetus is a person whose life and freedom is being
compromised. The question of rights is further complicated by the different
circumstances where the abortion issue could be raised. Many people would argue
that abortion should not be used as birth control or as a means to deal with the
consequences of promiscuous sex. However, how does one address the abortion
issue in the circumstance of rape or incest? Many say that in these circumstances,
abortion is justified. The confusing thing is that the outcome is the same in both
circumstances. The fetus is being denied its right to live and grow to its potential as
a human being. Where does one draw the line? What about a case where there is
medical complications? For example: a woman becomes pregnant and goes to the
doctor for an examination. During the doctor visit, various tests are run and it is
discovered that the baby will be born severely deformed and that its quality of life
would be extremely substandard. If the woman were to have an abortion, would it
be justified? What about a situation where a woman becomes pregnant and she
does to the doctor and is told that the baby is deformed and the birth would most
likely kill the mother. The argument justifying abortion in this case goes back to the
right to physical sovereignty over one’s own body. A person has the freedom to do
what he or she wants to concerning their own body as long as it does not harm or
compromise the freedom of another, except in self defense. Therefore, in the case
of the mother who would most likely die in childbirth, an abortion could be justified
because she is acting in self defense. And in the case of rape, many argue that an
abortion is also justified because the woman’s right to not conceive has been
violated, therefore she should not be responsible for the consequences which came
through no fault of her own. As on can see, the issue of abortion is on e that is
extremely complicated. The problem being that many of the ethical dilemmas
involved in the abortion issue are so closely intertwined that they are difficult to
distinguish from one another. There are some aspects of the issue that would
convince most people that abortion is justified, however when those aspects are
combined with other intertwining aspects and imperatives, justification oftentimes
becomes impossible. In conclusion, the issue of abortion is so complicated and
controversial that it is unlikely that a consensus could be reached by American
society. There are too many aspects of the issue which peoples views vary to
widely. Some of these issues could be things such as the definition of a person, is
the fetus a person, and if so when does it officially become a person. There is also
the issue of rights. Do the rights of a person outweigh the rights of a non person.
Does the right of a mother’s sovereignty over her body outweigh the right of an
unborn child to live. The answers to these questions are very diverse as a result of
the diversity of the American society. With the issue of abortion, one’s attitude
toward it is going to be based on many things such as religious background and
personal morals. There is no black and white answer to the abortion issue. Luckily
we live in a country where we are able to decide for ourselves whether something is
morally right or wrong. Thus, ultimately, the choice is ours. As with the many other
ethical issues which we are faced with in our society, it is hard to come to a
concrete answer until we are personally faced with that issue. All we can do is make
an effort to know all of the aspects which are involved so that we may be able to
make a sound decision if we were faced with this problem in our own lives.

BIBLIOGRAPHY

 ^ Dutt T, Matthews MP (1998). Gynaecology for Lawyers. 14. Routledge.

ISBN 9781859412152. http://books.google.com/?
id=KiRHpRl7TjsC&pg=PA173.
 ^ a b c d e Shah I, Ahman E (December 2009). "Unsafe abortion: global and
regional incidence, trends, consequences, and challenges". J Obstet
Gynaecol Can 31 (12): 1149–58. PMID 20085681.
 ^ a b c Culwell KR, Vekemans M, de Silva U, Hurwitz M (July 2010). "Critical
gaps in universal access to reproductive health: Contraception and
prevention of unsafe abortion". International Journal of Gynecology &
Obstetrics 110: S13–16. doi:10.1016/j.ijgo.2010.04.003. PMID 20451196.
 ^ Sedgh G, Henshaw SK, Singh S, Bankole A, Drescher J (September
2007). "Legal abortion worldwide: incidence and recent trends". Int Fam Plan
Perspect 33 (3): 106–16. doi:10.1363/ifpp.33.106.07. PMID 17938093.
http://www.guttmacher.org/pubs/journals/3310607.html.
 ^ Department of Reproductive Health and Research (2003). "Managing
Complications in Pregnancy and Childbirth – A guide for midwives and
doctors". World Health Organization. http://www.who.int/reproductive-
health/impac/Symptoms/Vaginal_bleeding_early_S7_S16.html. Retrieved
2009-04-07. NB: This definition is subject to regional differences, see
miscarriage.
 ^ a b "Q&A: Miscarriage". BBC. 2002-08-06.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/health/2176898.stm. Retrieved 2009-04-07.
 ^ Edmonds DK, Lindsay KS, Miller JF, Williamson E, Wood PJ (1982). "Early
embryonic mortality in women". Fertil. Steril. 38 (4): 447–453.
PMID 7117572.
 ^ Nilsson, Lennart; Lars Hamberger (1990) [1965]. A child is born. Garden
City, New York: Doubleday. p. 91. ISBN 0-385-40085-3. OCLC 21412111.
 ^ Martin J. Whittle and C. H. Rodeck, ed (1999). "Early pregnancy loss".
Fetal medicine: basic science and clinical practice. Edinburgh: Churchill
Livingstone. p. 836. ISBN 0-443-05357-X. OCLC 42792567.
http://books.google.com/?id=0BY0hx2l5uoC. The 'last menstrual period' is
sometimes referred to as the 'last normal menstrual period' (LNMP), since
miscarriage is associated with abnormal vaginal bleeding.
 ^ a b Stöppler. "Miscarriage (Spontaneous Abortion)". In Shiel WC Jr.
MedicineNet.com. http://www.medicinenet.com/miscarriage/page1.htm.
Retrieved 2009-04-07.
 ^ a b Jauniaux E, Kaminopetros P, El-Rafaey H (1999). "Early pregnancy
loss". In Whittle MJ,Rodeck CH. Fetal medicine: basic science and clinical
practice. Edinburgh: Churchill Livingstone. p. 837. ISBN 0-443-05357-X.
OCLC 42792567. http://books.google.com/?id=0BY0hx2l5uoC.
 ^ "Fetal Homicide Laws". National Conference of State Legislatures.
http://www.ncsl.org/programs/health/fethom.htm. Retrieved 2009-04-07.
 ^ Menikoff, Jerry. Law and Bioethics, p. 78 (Georgetown University Press
2001): "As the fetus grows in size, however, the vacuum aspiration method
becomes increasingly difficult to use."
 ^ a b c d Roche, Natalie E. (2004). Therapeutic Abortion. Retrieved 2006-
03-08.
 ^ Encyclopedia Britannica, (2007), Vol 26, p. 674.
 ^ Jones R. K. et al. (2008). "Abortion in the United States: incidence and
access to services, 2005". Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health
40 (1): 6–16. http://www.guttmacher.org/pubs/journals/4000608.pdf.
 ^ Spitz, I.M; Bardin, CW; Benton, L; Robbins, A (1998). "Early pregnancy
termination with mifepristone and misoprostol in the United States". New
England Journal of Medicine 338 (18): 1241.
doi:10.1056/NEJM199804303381801. PMID 9562577.
 ^ Healthwise (2004). "Manual and vacuum aspiration for abortion".
WebMD.
http://www.webmd.com/hw/womens_conditions/tw1078.asp#tw1112.
Retrieved 2008-12-05.
 ^ World Health Organization (2003). "Dilatation and curettage".
Managing Complications in Pregnancy and Childbirth: A Guide for Midwives
and Doctors. Geneva: World Health Organization. ISBN 92-4-154587-9.
OCLC 181845530. http://www.who.int/reproductive-
health/impac/Procedures/Dilatetion_P61_P63.html. Retrieved 2008-12-05.
 ^ McGee, Glenn; Jon F. Merz. "Abortion". Encarta. Microsoft.
http://encarta.msn.com/encyclopedia_761553899/Abortion.html. Retrieved
2008-12-05.
 ^ Nuffield Council on Bioethics (June 22, 2007). "Dilemmas in Current
Practice: The Fetus". Critical Case Decisions in Fetal and Neonatal Medicine:
Ethical Issues. Nuffield Council on Bioethics. ISBN 1-904384-14-5.
OCLC 85782378. http://www.nuffieldbioethics.org/sites/default/files/files/CCD
%20Chapter%204%20Dilemmas%20in%20current%20practice%20the
%20fetus.pdf. Retrieved 2010-12-31.
 ^ Potts M et al. (2007). Thousand-year-old depictions of massage
abortion. 33. 234. "at Angkor, the operator is a demon." Also see Mould R
(1996). Mould's Medical Anecdotes. CRC Press. p. 406. ISBN 0852741197.
 ^ Riddle, John M. (1997). Eve's herbs: a history of contraception and
abortion in the West. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press.
ISBN 0-674-27024-X. OCLC 36126503.[page needed]
 ^ Ciganda C, Laborde A (2003). "Herbal infusions used for induced
abortion". J. Toxicol. Clin. Toxicol. 41 (3): 235–239. doi:10.1081/CLT-
120021104. PMID 12807304.
 ^ Education for Choice. (2005-05-06).
http://www.efc.org.uk/Foryoungpeople/Factsaboutabortion/Unsafeabortion
Unsafe abortion. Retrieved 2006-01-11.
 ^ a b Potts, Malcolm (2002). "History of Contraception". Gynecology and
Obstetrics 6 (8).
 ^ Thapa SR, Rimal D, Preston J (September 2006). "Self induction of
abortion with instrumentation". Aust Fam Physician 35 (9): 697–698.
PMID 16969439. http://www.racgp.org.au/afp/200609/11015. Retrieved
2008-12-04.
 ^ Grimes DA, Benson J, Singh S, et al. (November 2006). "Unsafe
abortion: the preventable pandemic". Lancet 368 (9550): 1908–19.
doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(06)69481-6. PMID 17126724.
http://www.who.int/reproductivehealth/publications/general/lancet_4.pdf.
 ^ a b Grimes DA, Creinin MD (April 2004). "Induced abortion: an overview
for internists". Ann. Intern. Med. 140 (8): 620–6.
doi:10.1001/archinte.140.5.620. PMID 15096333.
http://www.annals.org/content/140/8/620.full.
 ^ a b Yanda K. et al (Sept 2003). "Reproductive health and human rights".
International journal of gynecology and obstetrics 82 (3): 275–283.
doi:10.1016/S0020-7292(03)00226-1. PMID 14499974.
http://www.ijgo.org/article/PIIS0020729203002261/fulltext.
 ^ Vekemans M (June 2009). "Making induced abortion safe and legal,
worldwide". Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care 14 (3): 165–8.
doi:10.1080/13625180902886371. PMID 19565413.
 ^ Grimes DA (January 2006). "Estimation of pregnancy-related mortality
risk by pregnancy outcome, United States, 1991 to 1999". Am. J. Obstet.
Gynecol. 194 (1): 92–4. doi:10.1016/j.ajog.2005.06.070. PMID 16389015.
 ^ Douglas W. Laube; Barzansky, Barbara M.; Beckmann, Charles R. B.;
Herbert, William G. (2009). Obstetrics and Gynecology. Hagerstown,
Maryland: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins. p. 150. ISBN 0-7817-8807-2.
 ^ Kulczycki A, Potts M, Rosenfield A (June 1996). "Abortion and fertility
regulation". Lancet 347 (9016): 1663–8. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(96)91491-
9. PMID 8642962.
 ^ Danielle Mazza (2004). Women's health in general practice. Oxford:
Butterworth-Heinemann. p. 93. ISBN 0-7506-8773-8.
 ^ Eric Sokol; Andrew Sokol (2007). General gynecology. St. Louis: Mosby.
p. 238. ISBN 0-323-03247-8.
 ^ Lloyd, Cynthia B. (2005). Growing up global: the changing transitions to
adulthood in developing countries. Washington, D.C: National Academies
Press. p. 215. ISBN 0-309-09528-X.
 ^ Douglas W. Laube; Barzansky, Barbara M.; Beckmann, Charles R. B.;
Herbert, William G. (2009). Obstetrics and Gynecology. Hagerstwon, MD:
Lippincott Williams & Wilkins. p. 150. ISBN 0-7817-8807-2.
 ^ "The Prevention and Management of Unsafe Abortion" (PDF). World
Health Organization. April 1995.
http://whqlibdoc.who.int/hq/1992/WHO_MSM_92.5.pdf. Retrieved June 1,
2010.
 ^ Fawcus SR (June 2008). "Maternal mortality and unsafe abortion". Best
Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol 22 (3): 533–48.
doi:10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2007.10.006. PMID 18249585.
 ^ World Health Organization (1997). Medical Methods for Termination of
Pregnancy: Report of a Who Scientific Group. Who Technical Report Series
No. 871. Geneva: World Health Organization. ISBN 92-4-120871-6.
OCLC 38276325.[page needed]
 ^ Botha, Rosanne L.; Bednarek, Paula H.; Kaunitz, Andrew M.; Alison B.
Edelman (2010). "Complications of Medical and Surgical Abortion". In Guy I
Benrubi. Handbook of Obstetric and Gynecologic Emergencies (4 ed.).
Lippincott Williams & Wilkins. p. 256. ISBN 978-1605476667. "Although first
trimester medical and surgical abortion are safe with low rates of major
complications, these are common procedures, and therefore it is not unusual
for women with abortion complications to present for emergent care."
 ^ a b c Pregler, Janet P.; DeCherney, Alan H. (2002). Women's health:
principles and clinical practice. pmph usa. p. 232. ISBN 978-1550091700.
 ^ Jordi Rello, ed. Infectious diseases in critical care (2 ed.). Springer.
p. 490. ISBN 978-3540344056.
 ^ Lohr PA, Hayes JL, Gemzell-Danielsson K (2008). "Surgical versus
medical methods for second trimester induced abortion". Cochrane
Database Syst Rev (1): CD006714. doi:10.1002/14651858.CD006714.pub2.
PMID 18254113.
 ^ Botha, Rosanne L.; Bednarek, Paula H.; Kaunitz, Andrew M.; Alison B.
Edelman (2010). "Complications of Medical and Surgical Abortion". In Guy I
Benrubi. Handbook of Obstetric and Gynecologic Emergencies (4 ed.).
Lippincott Williams & Wilkins. p. 258. ISBN 978-1605476667.
 ^ Morgan, Mark; Siddighi, Sam (2004). NMS Obstetrics and Gynecology.
National Medical Series for Independent Study (5 ed.). Lippincott Williams &
Wilkins. p. 140. ISBN 978-0781726795.
 ^ Speroff, Leon; Fritz, Marc A. (2004). "Family Planning, Sterilization, and
Abortion". Clinical gynecologic endocrinology and infertility (7 ed.). Lippincott
Williams & Wilkins. p. 851. ISBN 978-0781747950.
 ^ "Medical versus surgical methods for first trimester termination of
pregnancy". World Health Organization. December 15, 2006.
http://apps.who.int/rhl/fertility/abortion/pccom/en/index.html. Retrieved June
1, 2010.
 ^ "Induced abortion does not increase breast cancer risk (Fact sheet
N°240)". World Health Organization.
http://www.who.int/mediacentre/factsheets/fs240/en/. Retrieved 2011-01-06.
 ^ McCredie M et al. (1998). International Journal of Cancer 76: 182–88.
 ^ "Abortion, Miscarriage, and Breast Cancer Risk". National Cancer
Institute. http://www.cancer.gov/cancertopics/factsheet/risk/abortion-
miscarriage. Retrieved 2011-01-11.
 ^ "ACOG Finds No Link Between Abortion and Breast Cancer Risk".
American Congress of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. July 31, 2003.
http://www.acog.org/from_home/publications/press_releases/nr07-31-03-
2.cfm. Retrieved 2011-01-11.
 ^ "The Care of Women Requesting Induced Abortion" (PDF). Royal
College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists. p. 9.
http://www.rcog.org.uk/files/rcog-corp/uploaded-
files/NEBAbortionSummary.pdf. Retrieved 2008-06-29. "Induced abortion is
not associated with an increase in breast cancer risk."
 ^ Jasen P (2005). "Breast cancer and the politics of abortion in the United
States". Med Hist 49 (4): 423–44. PMID 16562329.
 ^ Cockburn, Jayne; Pawson, Michael E. (2007). Psychological Challenges
to Obstetrics and Gynecology: The Clinical Management. Springer. p. 243.
ISBN 978-1846288074.
 ^ Adler NE, David HP, Major BN, Roth SH, Russo NF, Wyatt GE (1990).
"Psychological responses after abortion". Science 248 (4951): 41–4.
doi:10.1126/science.2181664. PMID 2181664.
 ^ "Report of the APA Task Force on Mental Health and Abortion".
Washington, DC: American Psychological Association. August 13, 2008.
http://www.apa.org/pi/women/programs/abortion/mental-health.pdf.
 ^ Grimes DA, Creinin MD (2004). "Induced abortion: an overview for
internists". Ann Intern Med 140 (8): 620–6. doi:10.1001/archinte.140.5.620.
PMID 15096333. "Abortion does not lead to an increased risk for breast
cancer or other late psychiatric or medical sequelae. ... The alleged
'postabortion trauma syndrome' does not exist.".
 ^ Stotland NL (2003). "Abortion and psychiatric practice". J Psychiatr
Pract 9 (2): 139–149. doi:10.1097/00131746-200303000-00005.
PMID 15985924. "Currently, there are active attempts to convince the public
and women considering abortion that abortion frequently has negative
psychiatric consequences. This assertion is not borne out by the literature:
the vast majority of women tolerate abortion without psychiatric sequelae.".
 ^ Stotland NL (October 1992). "The myth of the abortion trauma
syndrome". J Am Med Assoc 268 (15): 2078–9.
doi:10.1001/jama.268.15.2078. PMID 1404747.
 ^ T. Munk-Olsen, et al, "Induced First-Trimester Abortion and Risk of
Mental Disorder", New England Journal of Medicine, 364:332-339, January 27,
2011
 ^ Shah I, Ahman E (December 2009). "Unsafe abortion: global and
regional incidence, trends, consequences, and challenges". J Obstet
Gynaecol Can 31 (12): 1149–58. PMID 20085681. "However, a woman’s
chance of having an abortion is similar whether she lives in a developed or a
developing region: in 2003 the rates were 26 abortions per 1000 women
aged 15 to 44 in developed areas and 29 per 1000 in developing areas. The
main difference is in safety, with abortion being safe and easily accessible in
developed countries and generally restricted and unsafe in most developing
countries".
 ^ Sedgh, Gilda and Henshaw, Stanley. "Measuring the Incidence of
Abortion in Countries With Liberal Laws" in Methodologies for Estimating
Abortion Incidence and Abortion-Related Morbidity: A Review, (Guttmacher
Institute 2010): "In countries with highly restrictive abortion laws, it is
extremely difficult to obtain reliable counts of the numbers of procedures
performed."
 ^ Rosenthal, Elizabeth. "Legal or Not, Abortion Rates Compare", The New
York Times (2007-10-12): "Anti-abortion groups criticized the research,
saying that the scientists had jumped to conclusions from imperfect tallies,
often estimates of abortion rates in countries where the procedure was
illegal."
 ^ Singh, Susheela et al. Adding it Up: The Costs and Benefits of Investing
in Family Planning and Newborn Health, pages 17, 19, and 27 (New York:
Guttmacher Institute and United Nations Population Fund 2009): "Some 215
million women in the developing world as a whole have an unmet need for
modern contraceptives…. If the 215 million women with unmet need used
modern family planning methods....[that] would result in about 22 million
fewer unplanned births; 25 million fewer abortions; and seven million fewer
miscarriages....If women’s contraceptive needs were addressed (and
assuming no changes in abortion laws)...the number of unsafe abortions
would decline by 73% from 20 million to 5.5 million." A few of the findings in
that report were subsequently changed, and are available at: "Facts on
Investing in Family Planning and Maternal and Newborn Health" (Guttmacher
Institute 2010).
 ^ Henshaw, Stanley K., Singh, Susheela, and Haas, Taylor. (1999). The
Incidence of Abortion Worldwide. International Family Planning Perspectives,
25 (Supplement), 30–38. Retrieved 2006-01-18.
 ^ Strauss, L.T., Gamble, S.B., Parker, W.Y, Cook, D.A., Zane, S.B., and
Hamdan, S. (November 24, 2006). Abortion Surveillance – United States,
2003. Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report, 55 (11), 1–32. Retrieved May
10, 2007.
 ^ Finer, Lawrence B. and Henshaw, Stanley K. (2003). Abortion Incidence
and Services in the United States in 2000. Perspectives on Sexual and
Reproductive Health, 35 (1).'.' Retrieved 2006-05-10.
 ^ Department of Health (2007). "Abortion statistics, England and Wales:
2006".
http://www.dh.gov.uk/en/Publicationsandstatistics/Publications/PublicationsSt
atistics/DH_075697. Retrieved 2007-10-12.
 ^ Cheng L. “Surgical versus medical methods for second-trimester
induced abortion : RHL commentary” (last revised: 1 November 2008). The
WHO Reproductive Health Library; Geneva: World Health Organization.
 ^ a b Bankole, Akinrinola, Singh, Susheela, and Haas, Taylor. (1998).
Reasons Why Women Have Induced Abortions: Evidence from 27 Countries.
International Family Planning Perspectives, 24 (3), 117–127 and 152.
Retrieved 2006-01-18.
 ^ a b Finer, Lawrence B., Frohwirth, Lori F., Dauphinee, Lindsay A., Singh,
Shusheela, and Moore, Ann M. (2005). Reasons U.S. women have abortions:
quantative and qualitative perspectives. Perspectives on Sexual and
Reproductive Health, 37 (3), 110–118. Retrieved 2006-01-18.
 ^ Jones, Rachel K., Darroch, Jacqueline E., Henshaw, Stanley K. (2002).
Contraceptive Use Among U.S. Women Having Abortions in 2000–2001.
Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health, 34 (6).'.' Retrieved June 15,
2006.
 ^ Susan A. Cohen: Abortion and Women of Color: The Bigger Picture,
Guttmacher Policy Review, Summer 2008, Volume 11, Number 3.
 ^ World Health Organization. (2004). "Unsafe abortion: global and
regional estimates of unsafe abortion and associated mortality in 2000".
Retrieved 2009-03-22.
 ^ Salter, C., Johnson, H.B., and Hengen, N. (1997). Care for post abortion
complications: saving women's lives. Population Reports, 25 (1).'.' Retrieved
2006-02-22.
 ^ Sedgh, Gilda; Henshaw, S; Singh, S; Ahman, E; Shah, IH (October
2007). "Induced abortion: estimated rates and trends worldwide" (PDF). The
Lancet 370 (9595): 1338–1345. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(07)61575-X.
PMID 17933648.
http://media.mcclatchydc.com/smedia/2007/10/17/13/Chang-
Guttmacher_Institute_abortion_report.source.prod_affiliate.91.pdf. Retrieved
2008-12-02.
 ^ UNICEF, United Nations Population Fund, WHO, World Bank (2010).
"Packages of interventions: Family planning, safe abortion care, maternal,
newborn and child health".
http://www.who.int/reproductivehealth/publications/maternal_perinatal_healt
h/fch_10_06/en/index.html. Retrieved December 31, 2010.
 ^ Devereux, G. (1967). "A typological study of abortion in 350 primitive,
ancient, and pre-industrial societies". In Harold Rosen. Abortion in America;
medical, psychiatric, legal, anthropological, and religious considerations.
Boston: Beacon Press. OCLC 187445. http://www.popline.org/docs/671051.
Retrieved 2008-12-02.[dead link]
 ^ Lefkowitz, Mary R.; Maureen B. Fant (1992). Women's life in Greece &
Rome: a source book in translation. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University
Press. ISBN 0-8018-4474-6. OCLC 25373320.
http://www.stoa.org/diotima/anthology/wlgr/. Retrieved 2008-12-02.
 ^ Sheikh, Sa'diyya (2003). "Family Planning, Contraception, and Abortion
in Islam". In Maguire, Daniel C.. Sacred Rights: The Case for Contraception
and Abortion in World Religions. Oxford University Press US. pp. 105–128
[105–106]. ISBN 0195160010.
 ^ Sheikh, Sa'diyya (2003). "Family Planning, Contraception, and Abortion
in Islam". In Maguire, Daniel C.. Sacred Rights: The Case for Contraception
and Abortion in World Religions. Oxford University Press US. pp. 105–128
[115]. ISBN 0195160010. "Due to this broad-based legal permissibility of
contraception in Islamic law, Muslim physicians in the medieval period
conducted in-dept investigations into the medical dimension of birth control,
which were unparalleled in European medicine until the nineteenth century."
This author cites pp.31–6 of Basim Musallam, Sex and Society in Islam (1983)
Cambridge University Press
 ^ "50 Random Facts About ...... Abortion". Random Facts.
 ^ "1911 Encyclopædia Britannica/Medicine"
 ^ Riddle, John M. (1992). Contraception and Abortion from the Ancient
World to the Renaissance. London: Harvard University Press.
ISBN 0674168763.
 ^ "History of Prostitution". Civil Liberties. About.com.
http://civilliberty.about.com/od/gendersexuality/tp/History-of-
Prostitution.htm.
 ^ DeHullu, James. "Histories of Abortion".
http://mysite.verizon.net/jdehullu/abortion/abhist.htm. Retrieved 2008-12-02.
 ^ "Abortion Law, History & Religion". Childbirth By Choice Trust. Archived
from the original on 2008-02-08.
http://web.archive.org/web/20080208053146/http://www.cbctrust.com/histor
y_law_religion.php. Retrieved 2008-03-23.
 ^ Friedlander, Henry (1995). The origins of Nazi genocide: from
euthanasia to the final solution. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina
Press. p. 30. ISBN 0-8078-4675-9. OCLC 60191622.
 ^ Proctor, Robert (1988). Racial Hygiene: Medicine Under the Nazis.
Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press. pp. 122, 123 and 366.
ISBN 0-674-74578-7. OCLC 20760638.
 ^ Arnot, Margaret L.; Cornelie Usborne (1999). Gender and Crime in
Modern Europe. New York: Routledge. p. 231. ISBN 1-85728-745-2.
OCLC 186748539.
 ^ DiMeglio, Peter M. (1999). "Germany 1933–1945 (National Socialism)".
In Helen Tierney. Women's studies encyclopedia. Westport, Connecticut:
Greenwood Press. pp. 589. ISBN 0-313-31072-6. OCLC 38504469.
 ^ "Historical abortion statistics, FR Germany".
http://www.johnstonsarchive.net/policy/abortion/ab-frgermany.html.
 ^ The Pew Research Center for the People and the Press. (2005-11-02).
"Public Opinion Supports Alito on Spousal Notification Even as It Favors Roe
v. Wade." Pew Research Center Pollwatch.'.' Retrieved 2006-03-01.
 ^ Henry de Bracton (1968) [c. 1250]. "The crime of homicide and the
divisions into which it falls". In George E. Woodbine ed.; Samuel Edmund
Thorne trans.. On the Laws and Customs of England. 2. p. 341.
ISBN 0196266130. OCLC 1872.
http://hlsl5.law.harvard.edu/bracton/Unframed/English/v2/341.htm. Retrieved
2008-12-11.
 ^ "Abortion – Abortion In English Law". Law.jrank.org.
http://law.jrank.org/pages/445/Abortion-Abortion-in-English-law.html.
Retrieved 2011-01-30.
 ^ Garrison, Fielding (1921). An Introduction to the History of Medicine.
Saunders. pp. 566–7. ISBN 0721640303. http://books.google.com/?
id=JvoIAAAAIAAJ&pg=PA567&dq=fetilization+was+discovered+hertwig.
 ^ The History of New York State Book 12, Chapter 13, Part 3, Editor, Dr.
James Sullivan available at [1]
 ^ "Lord Ellenborough’s Act". The Abortion Law Homepage. 1998.
Archived from the original on 2007-09-18.
http://web.archive.org/web/20070918233015/http://members.aol.com/abtrbn
g/lea.htm. Retrieved 2007-02-20. (via Archive.org)
 ^ United Nations Population Division (2002). "Abortion Policies: A Global
Review". http://www.un.org/esa/population/publications/abortion. Retrieved
February 22, 2007.
 ^ Kaposy, C. (2008). "Improving Abortion Access in Canada". Health Care
Analysis 18 (1): 17–34. doi:10.1007/s10728-008-0101-0. PMID 18821017. edit
 ^ Theodore J. Joyce, Stanley K. Henshaw, Amanda Dennis, Lawrence B.
Finer and Kelly Blanchard (April 2009). "The Impact of State Mandatory
Counseling and Waiting Period Laws on Abortion: A Literature Review" (PDF).
Guttmacher Institute.
http://internationalfamilyplanningperspectives.org/pubs/MandatoryCounselin
g.pdf. Retrieved December 31, 2010.
 ^ "European delegation visits Nicaragua to examine effects of abortion
ban". Ipas. November 26, 2007. Archived from the original on 2008-04-17.
http://web.archive.org/web/20080417033829/http://www.ipas.org/Library/Ne
ws/News_Items/European_delegation_visits_Nicaragua_to_examine_effects_of
_abortion_ban.aspx. Retrieved 2009-06-15. "More than 82 maternal deaths
had been registered in Nicaragua since the change. During this same period,
indirect obstetric deaths, or deaths caused by illnesses aggravated by the
normal effects of pregnancy and not due to direct obstetric causes, have
doubled."
 ^ "NICARAGUA: "The Women’s Movement Is in Opposition"". IPS.
Montevideo: Inside Costa Rica. 28 June 2008.
http://insidecostarica.com/special_reports/2008-
06/nicaragua_womens_movement.htm.
 ^ Ross, Jen (September 12, 2006). "In Chile, free morning-after pills to
teens". The Christian Science Monitor.
http://www.csmonitor.com/2006/0912/p01s04-woam.html. Retrieved 2006-
12-07.
 ^ Gallardoi, Eduardo (September 26, 2006). "Morning-After Pill Causes
Furor in Chile". The Washington Post. http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-
dyn/content/article/2006/09/26/AR2006092600770.html. Retrieved 2006-12-
07.
 ^ "Surgical Abortion: History and Overview". National Abortion
Federation.
http://www.prochoice.org/education/resources/surg_history_overview.html.
Retrieved 2006-09-04.
 ^ Marcy Bloom (February 25, 2008). "Need Abortion, Will Travel". RH
Reality Check. http://www.rhrealitycheck.org/blog/2008/02/25/need-abortion-
will-travel. Retrieved 2009-06-15.
 ^ "United States: Percentage of Legal Abortions Obtained by Out-of-State
Residents, 2005". The Kaiser Family Foundation.
http://www.statehealthfacts.kff.org/profileind.jsp?rgn=1&cat=10&ind=467.
Retrieved 2009-06-14.
 ^ Pogatchnik, Shawn (November 5, 2008). "Thousands of women in N.
Ireland travel to England for abortions". eTurboNews.
http://www.eturbonews.com/6052/thousands-women-n-ireland-travel-
england-abortions.
 ^ Baczynska, Gabriela (August 26, 2010). "More Polish women seen
seeking abortions abroad". Reuters.
http://www.reuters.com/article/idUSTRE67P46Z20100826.
 ^ Banister, Judith. (1999-03-16). Son Preference in Asia – Report of a
Symposium. Retrieved 2006-01-12.
 ^ Mutharayappa, Rangamuthia, Kim Choe, Minja, Arnold, Fred, and Roy,
T.K. (1997). Son Preferences and Its Effect on Fertility in India. National
Family Health Survey Subject Reports, Number 3.'.' Retrieved 2006-01-12.
 ^ Patel, Rita (Fall 1996). "The practice of sex selective abortion in India:
May you be the mother of a hundred sons" (PDF). Carolina Papers in
International Health and Development 7. Archived from the original on 2010-
06-16. http://www.webcitation.org/5qWhqeiZq. Retrieved 2008-12-03.
 ^ Sudha, S.; Rajan, S. Irudaya (July 1999). "Female Demographic
Disadvantage in India 1981–1991: Sex Selective Abortions and Female
Infanticide". Development and Change 30 (3): 585–618. doi:10.1111/1467-
7660.00130. PMID 20162850. Archived from the original on 2003-01-01.
http://web.archive.org/web/20030101210623/http://www.hsph.harvard.edu/o
rganizations/healthnet/gender/docs/sudha.html. Retrieved 2008-12-03.
 ^ Reaney, Patricia. "Selective abortion blamed for India's missing girls".
Reuters. Archived from the original on 2006-02-20.
http://web.archive.org/web/20060220072756/http://www.alertnet.org/thenew
s/newsdesk/L06779563.htm. Retrieved 2008-12-03.
 ^ Mudur, Ganapati (2002). "India plans new legislation to prevent sex
selection". BMJ 324 (7334): 385b. doi:10.1136/bmj.324.7334.385/b.
 ^ Graham, Maureen J.; Larsen; Xu (June 1998). "Son Preference in Anhui
Province, China". International Family Planning Perspectives 24 (2): 72.
doi:10.2307/2991929. http://www.agi-usa.org/pubs/journals/2407298.html.
Retrieved 2008-12-03.
 ^ Plafker, Ted (May 2002). "Sex selection in China sees 117 boys born for
every 100 girls". BMJ 324 (7348): 1233a. doi:10.1136/bmj.324.7348.1233/a.
PMID 12028966.
 ^ "China Bans Sex-selection Abortion." (2002-03-22). Xinhua News
Agency.'.' Retrieved 2006-01-12.
 ^ Smith, G. Davidson (Tim) (1998). "Single Issue Terrorism Commentary".
Canadian Security Intelligence Service. http://www.csis-
scrs.gc.ca/en/publications/commentary/com74.asp. Retrieved June 9, 2006.
 ^ Michele Wilson, John Lynxwiler (1988), "Abortion clinic violence as
terrorism", Studies in Conflict & Terrorism, 11 (4), pp 263 – 273
 ^ "The Death of Dr. Gunn". New York Times. 12 March 1993.
http://www.nytimes.com/1993/03/12/opinion/the-death-of-dr-gunn.html.
 ^ "Incidence of Violence & Disruption Against Abortion Providers in the
U.S. & Canada" (PDF). National Abortion Federation. 2009.
http://www.prochoice.org/pubs_research/publications/downloads/about_abort
ion/violence_stats.pdf. Retrieved February 9, 2010.
 ^ Borger, Julian (February 3, 1999). "The bomber under siege". The
Guardian.
http://www.guardian.co.uk/theguardian/1999/feb/03/features11.g26.
 ^ "Art theft linked to pro-life drive Abortion foe hints painting's return
hinges on TV film". thestar.com. 1994-02-18.
http://pqasb.pqarchiver.com/thestar/access/517847961.html?
dids=517847961:517847961&FMT=ABS&FMTS=ABS:FT&type=current&date
=Feb+18%2C+1994&author=%28AP
%29&pub=Toronto+Star&desc=Art+theft+linked+to+pro-
life+drive+Abortion+foe+hints+painting
%27s+return+hinges+on+TV+film&pqatl=google. Retrieved 2010-09-25.
 ^ "Principally relating to Xiao Yu's work Ruan". Other Shore Artfile.
http://www.othershore-arts.net/xiaoyuESSAYS10.html. Retrieved 2010-06-27.
 ^ Soupcoff, Marni (2008-04-17). "Marni Soupcoff's Zeitgeist: Photofiddle,
Rentbetter.org, Mandie Brady and Aliza Shvarts". Full Comment. National
Post.
http://network.nationalpost.com/np/blogs/fullcomment/archive/2008/04/17/m
arni-soupcoff-s-zeitgeist-photofiddle-rentbetter-org-mandie-brady-and-aliza-
shvarts.aspx. Retrieved 2008-04-30.
 ^ John Irving (1985). The Cider House Rules. New York: William Morrow.
ISBN 068803036X.
 ^ Marge Piercy (1997). Braided Lives. New York: Ballantine Books.
ISBN 978-0449000915.
 ^ Sue Wicklund; Susan Wicklund (2007). This Common Secret: My
Journey as an Abortion Doctor. New York: PublicAffairs. ISBN 1-58648-480-X.
 ^ Irene Vilar (2009). Impossible Motherhood: Testimony of an Abortion
Addict. Other Press. ISBN 978-1590513200.
 ^ "The Godfather: Part II (1974) – Memorable quotes". imdb.com.
http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0071562/quotes. Retrieved 2010-07-01.
 ^ "films that discuss Abortion . . . a movie list". movietrain.net.
http://www.movietrain.net/films-that-discuss-abortion-a-movie-list/. Retrieved
2010-06-13.
 ^ Spencer, James. Sheep Husbandry in Canada, p. 124 (1911).
 ^ "Beef cattle and Beef production: Management and Husbandry of Beef
Cattle”, Encyclopaedia of New Zealand (1966).
 ^ McKinnon, Angus et al. Equine Reproduction, p. 563 (Wiley-Blackwell
1993).
 ^ Berger, Joel W (5 May 1983). "Induced abortion and social factors in
wild horses". Nature (London) 303 (5912): 59–61. doi:10.1038/303059a0.
PMID 6682487.
http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v303/n5912/abs/303059a0.html.
 ^ Pluháček, Jan; Bartos, L (2000). "Male infanticide in captive plains
zebra, Equus burchelli". Animal Behaviour 59 (4): 689–694.
doi:10.1006/anbe.1999.1371. PMID 10792924.
http://af.czu.cz/~bartos/publications/pdf/Pluhacek_Bartos_2000_AB.pdf.
 ^ Pluháček, Jan (2005). "Further evidence for male infanticide and
feticide in captive plains zebra, Equus burchelli". Folia Zool. 54 (3): 258–262.
http://www.ivb.cz/folia/54/3/258-262.pdf.
 ^ JW, Fitzpatrick (October 1991). "Changes in herd stallions among feral
horse bands and the absence of forced copulation and induced abortion".
Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology (Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer) 29 (3):
217–219. ISSN (Print) 1432-0762 (Online) 0340-5443 (Print) 1432-0762
(Online). http://www.springerlink.com/content/k1543n1548987255/.
 ^ Agoramoorthy, G.; Mohnot, S. M.; Sommer, V.; Srivastava, A. (1988).
"Abortions in free ranging Hanuman langurs (Presbytis entellus) — a male
induced strategy?". Human Evolution 3: 297-308.