CPIA divide low-income used for security within borders, countries into five fragile and basic social needs and / or categories, the lowest two conflictthe political legitimacy to of which are fragile states affected effectively represent their citizens at home or abroad. 3. Or less. Core political legitimacy to fragile is CPIA below 3.0, effectively represent marginal if between 3. And citizens at home and 3.0. Abroad. Broad areas Economic: GDP growth; policies for social institutions; extent to percentage GDP per inclusion / equity; protection and labour; unemployment; women
CPIA divide low-income used for security within borders, countries into five fragile and basic social needs and / or categories, the lowest two conflictthe political legitimacy to of which are fragile states affected effectively represent their citizens at home or abroad. 3. Or less. Core political legitimacy to fragile is CPIA below 3.0, effectively represent marginal if between 3. And citizens at home and 3.0. Abroad. Broad areas Economic: GDP growth; policies for social institutions; extent to percentage GDP per inclusion / equity; protection and labour; unemployment; women
Copyright:
Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
Available Formats
Download as DOC, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
CPIA divide low-income used for security within borders, countries into five fragile and basic social needs and / or categories, the lowest two conflictthe political legitimacy to of which are fragile states affected effectively represent their citizens at home or abroad. 3. Or less. Core political legitimacy to fragile is CPIA below 3.0, effectively represent marginal if between 3. And citizens at home and 3.0. Abroad. Broad areas Economic: GDP growth; policies for social institutions; extent to percentage GDP per inclusion / equity; protection and labour; unemployment; women
Copyright:
Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
Available Formats
Download as DOC, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
What is a FCAS (Fragile and Conflict-affected State?
Table 1. Key differences between FCAS lists
FCAS The Brookings Index of Carleton University World Bank’s Country
Index/List State Weakness in the Country Indicators for Policy and Institutional Developing World Foreign Policy project Assessments List (CPIA) Definition Fragile states are those Assessment of basic CPIA divide low-income used for countries where there is security within borders, countries into five fragile and ‘occurrence & intensity of basic social needs and/or categories, the lowest two conflict- violent conflict or its the political legitimacy to of which are fragile states affected residual effects (e.g. effectively represent their who have a CPIA rating of population displacement), citizens at home or abroad. 3.2 or less. There is a illegal seizure of political Fragile states lack the separate group of unranked power, perceptions of functional authority to countries, also deemed political instability, provide basic security fragile. List excludes territory affected by within their borders, the MICs. Defined as fragile conflict & state-sponsored institutional capacity to state if it is LIC, IDA- political violence & gross provide basic social needs eligible, with CPIA score human rights abuses.’ for populations and/or of 3.2 or below. Core Bottom two quintiles of political legitimacy to fragile is CPIA below 3.0, rankings are FCAS effectively represent marginal if between 3.2 and citizens at home and 3.0. abroad. Broad areas Economic: recent Governance: freedom of Economic management: covered in economic growth; quality press; government macroeconomic indicators of existing policies; effectiveness;perception of management; fiscal policy; used in conducive to private sector level of corruption; level debt policy. constructing development; degree of of democracy; refugees Structural policies: trade; index equitable income hosted; restrictions on civil financial sector; business distribution. liberty; rule of law. regulatory environment. Political: quality of Economic: GDP growth; Policies for social institutions; extent to percentage GDP per inclusion/equity: gender which citizens accept capita; total GDP; FDI; equality; equity of public legitimacy of government; foreign aid, inequality; gini resource use; building government accountability coefficient; inflation; human resources; social to citizens; rule of law; informal economy; protection & labour; extent of corruption; unemployment; women in policies & institutions for democratisation; freedom labour force. environmental of expression/association; Security & Crime: conflict sustainability. ability of state intensity; human rights; Public sector management bureaucracy. Security: military expenditure; & institutions: property ability of state to provide political stability; refugees rights & rule-based physical security for produced; terrorism. government; quality of citizens. Measures: Human development: budgetary/financial occurrence & intensity of access to water/sanitation; management; efficiency of violent conflict or residual education; food security; revenue mobilisation; effects (e.g. population health infrastructure; quality of public admin; displacements); illegal prevalence of HIV/AIDS; transparency/accountability seizure of political power; HDI; literacy. and corruption in public perceptions of political Demography: life sector. instability; territory expectancy; migration; affected by political population instability & state- density/diversity; sponsored violence & population growth; slum human rights abuses. population. Social welfare: how well Environment: arable/fertile state meets basic needs land; consumption of including nutrition, health, energy; disaster risk index; education & access to pollution; change in annual clean water/sanitation. percentage of forest cover. Sources: Brookings Index: www.brookings.edu/reports/2008/02_weak_states_index.aspx; World Bank CPIA: www.worldbank.org; Carleton CFIP: www.carleton.ca/cifp Note: There is also the Foreign Policy/Fund for Peace ‘Failed States Index’. This assesses extremities – e.g. loss of physical control of territory. It is composed of 12 indicators. See www.foreignpolicy.com/articles/2010/06/21/2010_failed_states_index_interactive_map_and_rankings
Table 2. Comparison of FCAS lists (bold indicates countries common to all 3 lists)
The Brookings Index Carleton University World Bank’s Aggregated list
of State Weakness in Country Indicators Country Policy and (all 3 lists) used in the Developing World for Foreign Policy Institutional OECD (2010) 2008 project Assessments List (CIFP) 2008 (CPIA) 2008 28 countries 30 countries 32 countries 43 countries
Afghanistan Afghanistan Afghanistan Afghanistan
Angola Angola Angola Angola Burma Burundi Burundi Burundi Burundi Central Afr. Rep. Cameroon Cameroon Central Afr. Rep. Chad Central Afr. Rep. Central Afr. Rep. Chad Comoros Chad Chad Congo, Dem. Rep. Congo, Dem. Rep. Comoros Comoros Congo, Rep. Côte d’Ivoire Congo, Dem. Rep. Congo, Dem. Rep. Côte d’Ivoire Djibouti Congo, Rep. Congo, Rep. Equatorial Guinea Equatorial Guinea Côte d’Ivoire Côte d’Ivoire Eritrea Eritrea Djibouti Djibouti Ethiopia Ethiopia Eritrea Equatorial Guinea Guinea Guinea Gambia, The Eritrea Guinea-Bissau Guinea-Bissau Guinea Ethiopia Haiti Haiti Guinea-Bissau Gambia, The Iraq Iraq Haiti Guinea Liberia Kenya Kiribati Guinea-Bissau Nepal Liberia Pakistan Haiti Niger Myanmar (Burma) Papua New Guinea Iraq Nigeria Nepal Sao Tome And Principe Kenya North Korea Nigeria Sierra Leone Kiribati Rwanda Pakistan Solomon Islands Liberia Sierra Leone Sierra Leone Sudan Myanmar Somalia Somalia Tajikistan Nepal Sudan Sudan Timor-Leste Niger Togo Togo Togo Nigeria Uganda Uganda Tonga North Korea Zimbabwe West Bank and Gaza Yemen, Rep. Pakistan Yemen, Rep. Zimbabwe Papua New Guinea Zimbabwe Plus Unrated: Rwanda Liberia Sao Tome And Principe Myanmar Sierra Leone Somalia Solomon Islands Somalia Sudan Tajikistan Timor-Leste Togo Tonga Uganda West Bank and Gaza Yemen, Rep. Zimbabwe Sources: Brookings Index: www.brookings.edu/reports/2008/02_weak_states_index.aspx; World Bank CPIA: www.worldbank.org; Carleton CIFP: www.carleton.ca/cifp/ Note: Thanks to Dan Coppard, Development Initiatives.