Three Months Ago Bradley Manning Was Largely Forgotten, But Not Anymore -- What

Changed?

By Greg Mitchell, The Nation

Posted on March 4, 2011, Printed on March 11, 2011
http://www.alternet.org/story/150138/

The following article first appeared at the Nation. For more great content from the Nation, sign
up for their email newsletters here.

Ten months after he was arrested for allegedly leaking classified material, including diplomatic
cables, Army Pfc. Bradley Manning was very much in the news this week -- with the military
bringing 22 new charges against him, including "aiding the enemy" (unspecified) to being
stripped naked for seven hours at the prison the past two nights. His supporters and attorney
David Coombs continued to charge that the conditions of his confinement were overly harsh and
punitive, while the Pentagon continues to deny that.

With Manning gaining wide attention now, it’s worth recalling that three months ago he was
largely forgotten. How did so much change? Here's some background if you have just tuned into
Manning's case recently:

Even amid the vast Cablegate coverage, as I trace in my new book The Age of
WikiLeaks, Manning got little notice, although the blog FireDogLake kept on the case. Then, on
December 15, Glenn Greenwald at Salon delivered a strong piece on Manning’s “inhumane
detention.”

He charged that the conditions constituted “cruel and inhumane treatment and, by the standards
of many nations, even torture. Interviews with several people directly familiar with the
conditions of Manning’s detention, ultimately including a Quantico brig official (Lt. Brian
Villiard) who confirmed much of what they conveyed, establishes that the accused leaker is
subjected to detention conditions likely to create long-term psychological injuries.” (A key point:
The private has not yet been convicted of anything.)

Liberal blogs highlighted Greenwald’s piece and two days later the Guardian carried a report on
Manning’s health “deteriorating.” He was subject to some form of suicide watch, but it seemed
to his attorney more punitive than necessary.

On December 19, Manning’s lawyer, David Coombs, supplied some fresh details: “PFC
Manning is held in his cell for approximately 23 hours a day. The guards are required to check on
PFC Manning every five minutes by asking him if he is okay. PFC Manning is required to
respond in some affirmative manner. At night, if the guards cannot see PFC Manning clearly,
because he has a blanket over his head or is curled up towards the wall, they will wake him in
order to ensure he is okay. He receives each of his meals in his cell. He is not allowed to have a
pillow or sheets.”

The same day, NBC Nightly News paid a visit to Manning’s hometown in Oklahoma. A former
Marine there said he should be executed. Others were not much more sympathetic. Lester Holt,
the correspondent, suggested that some felt that the “don’t ask, don’t tell” policy then in effect
might have contributed to Manning’s decision to break ranks.

Four days later, David House, who had befriended Manning, filed a report at FireDogLake
(which had been following the soldier’s plight closer than any site) on his recent visits with
Bradley Manning at Quantico. He contradicted many of the military’s claims about his treatment.

On December 27, Glenn Greenwald revived a key component of the Manning saga, by
ripping Wired for a “journalistic disgrace.… For more than six months, Wired’s Senior Editor
Kevin Poulsen has possessed—but refuses to publish—the key evidence in one of the year’s
most significant political stories: the arrest of US Army PFC Bradley Manning for allegedly
acting as WikiLeaks’ source.… This has long ago left the realm of mere journalistic failure and
stands as one of the most egregious examples of active truth-hiding by a ‘journalist’ I’ve ever
seen.” Of course, he was referring to the unpublished portions of the Manning-Adrian Lamo chat
logs.

The following day, Wired editor Evan Hansen and senior editor Poulsen responded separately.
“It’s odd to find myself in the position of writing a defense of someone who should be held up as
a model,” Hansen wrote, referring to Poulsen. “But it is unfortunately necessary, thanks to the
shameless and unjustified personal attacks he’s faced.” Bottom line: Hansen still refused to print
the full chat logs, citing privacy concerns, but said he might do it in the future.

Greenwald quickly responded, again pointing out that Lamo had made claims about Manning’s
direct contacts with Assange that were not borne out by the published chat logs. He concluded:
“Ultimately, what determines one’s credibility is not the names you get called or the number of
people who get angry when you criticize them. What matters is whether the things you say are
well-supported and accurate, to correct them if they’re not, and to subject yourself to the same
accountability and transparency you demand of others.”

In any event, the exchanges sparked an important update by the Wired editors. They revealed that
they had reviewed the chat logs and found no unpublished Manning references to Assange. This
seemed to undermine some of Lamo’s claims and might make it harder to prosecute Assange in
this matter.

Then, on January 3, Manning’s lawyer Coombs hinted that he would soon file motion to dismiss
the charges against Manning due to lack of a speedy trial guaranteed by the Sixth Amendment.
Two days later, on the Democracy Now! radio program, well-known writer Dr. Atul Gawande,
referring to the Manning case, said, “People experience solitary confinement as even more
damaging than physical torture.” More than 30,000 people signed a petition on Manning’s
behalf.

As charges of cruel treatment of Manning continued, a Pentagon spokesman responded by

describing the prisoner’s confinement as “maximum,” not “solitary,” since others were
incarcerated nearby and he did get to watch some TV and see visitors—and was being treated
like others in the unit. David Coombs challenged this assessment, charging that Manning, in fact,
was the only prisoner in “maximum” custody while others were held in “medium” detention.

And the protests continued. Now: new charges (but no direct link ot Assange in evidence), even
harsher punitive treatment, and more Pentagon deceit.

Greg Mitchell is the former editor of Editor & Publisher and author of nine books on politics
and history.

© 2011 The Nation All rights reserved.

View this story online at: http://www.alternet.org/story/150138/