You are on page 1of 4

Hands and Feet in Indian Art

and 8th centuries, that we find the moulded or Natarajas and other Saivite figures of South
painted hands of greatest perfection; a little India belong to the Ioth, 13th, and subsequent
slenderer, a little more nervous, than the Gupta centuries. Very often these hands are holding
forms. These beautiful expressive hands and attributes,such as the drum, the axe, or the flame
feet are nowhere better drawn than at Ajanta; of Siva or the chakra of Vishnu. Examples of
several examples [FIGURES 8, 11-I4] are illustrated these are shown in FIGURES1-4, and 9. The
here from tracings by Samarandranath Gupta, hand with the drum, Siva [FIGURE6], appears
originally published in the " Modern Review" to me particularly beautiful. Next to these are
(Calcutta, August, 1912). With these may be many graceful hands from Nepalese images of
compared the somewhat earlier (5th century A.D.) somewhat uncertain date [PLATE,A,D] and one
hand with a lotus flower, from the rock painting at from Java [FIGURE5], which must be older than
Sigiriya in Ceylon [FIGURE7]. The feet of a the 14th century. The hand [FIGUREIo] holdingan
dancing Siva(Nataraja)from Anuradhapuramay be enamelled scent-sprayistracedfrom a fragmentof a
as earlyas the 8th century[PLATE,E, F]. The fine large Jaipur(Rajput) picture of the I8th century.

NOTES ON ITALIAN MEDALS-XVI*


BY G. F. HILL
RAPHAEL MARTINUS GOTHALANUS of recastings between the original and any
R. T. W. GREENE'S apparently particular specimen. But, from the fact that
unique and unpublished medal of the medallist of the Martin medal had to add a
this man which is here illustrated border to bring his reverse up to scale, it is clear
[PLATE, A] is quite obviously of that he only had a small specimen of the type to
Florentine origin, and of the class, hand. Possibly he used one of the Albizzi medal ;
dating from the last third of the 15th centuryand the the diameterof his field within the added borderis
early years of the I6th, which goes under the name just about the same (77-75 mm.) as that of the
of Niccol6 Fiorentino. The man's name is given whole field of the Albizzi medal. Whatever he
as RAPHAEL MARTINVS GOTHALANVS. used, he ruthlessly cut out the original inscription
Under the bust is his age, but owing to the letters and replaced it by the new one, IN HOC GRATILE
having come too close to the edge in the casting MVSAS PROVOCARVNT,
done in a manner very
it is difficult to say whether they are to be read as slovenly though hardly uncharacteristic of the
ANXXVIII or ANXXXIII. The reverseis one of Florentine school at this period.
the shop-designs of the school, very roughly and We do not know who Raphael Martin was,
carelessly adapted to a field rathertoo large for it but that he had literary pretensions we learn
by adding a raised border. If it is compared with from the inscriptionjust referredto. "Gothalanus"
the two well-known medals of Pico della Mirandola is naturally to be interpreted "Catalan", so that
and Giovanna Albizzi which have this type of the we may suppose Martin to have been a Spaniard
Three Graces on their reverses,we shall find that visiting or settled at Florence.1 Whoever he may
the type, as distinct from the inscription, is from be, we have in his portrait not the least fine of
one and the same model on all three medals. Yet the series produced by Niccol6 Fiorentino and
the diameters of the medals vary considerably. his school.
The Martinmedal is 87 mm.; the diameter of the BARTOLOMMEO CEPOLA
medal of Pico is given by Heiss as 87 mm., by The medal of this man is certainly more rare
Armandas 85 mm., which seems to be the normal ; and curious than beautiful. The specimen here
the Albizzi medal is only 78'5 mm. in the British illustrated [PLATE, C]2 is dull in
Museum specimen and still less on others accord- quality, but
apart from that accident there is something un-
ing to Heiss (75 mm.) and Armand (77 mm.). usually awkwardabout the contour and modelling
These differences in reproductions from the same
model are, of course, due to the varying shrinkage Don Pablo Bosch has very kindly caused much search to be
made at Barcelona with a view to identifying the man, but
of the metal in cooling and also to irregularitiesof without result. He makes the interesting suggestion that as
Catalaunumis the old name of Chalons sur Marne, so here
edge, as well as to the greater or less number Gothalanusmay be used by analogyfor a native of Chalons,and
* For previousarticles see Vols. xxiv, p. 36, xxII, p. 17, xxII, Martinbe really a Frenchman.
p. 131,xx, p. zoo, and xIx, p. 138,where will be found a full list SIn Mr. T. W. Greene's collection. It measures
up to that date. Armandalsogivesthe diameteras 53 mm. (11,73. 17),53 mm.
DESCRIPTION OF PLATE OPPOSITE
A. Raphael Martin. Florentine School. Collection of Mr. D. Reverse of medal of FernandoI de' Medici,by M. Mazza-
T. W. Greene. firri (wax model). Collectionof Mr. T. W. Greene.
B. AntonioRoselli. By BartolommeoBellano. BritishMuseum. E. Francesco Fermi. By Leone Leoni. British Museum.
c. BartolommeoCepola. Ascribed to Bellano. Collectionof F. Sigismund III of Poland (wax model). Collection of Mr.
Mr. T. W. Greene. T. W. Greene.

21I
iB

E 4W, ; E

Ak -MW
INB

C~~--~-14,

NOTES ON ITALIAN MEDALS-XVI


Notes on Italian Medals
of the portrait, and a peculiar "knobbly " effect FRANCESCO FERMI
which cannot be wholly due to faulty condition The little medal of Francesco Fermi, of which
of the original wax model, and which recalls, the British Museum specimen is illustrated in the
so far as I know, only one other medal of PLATE,E, is not of the highest importance; but
the 15th century. That is the medal by the signature LEOwhich is plainly visible below
Bartolommeo Bellano of Antonio Roselli [PLATE, the bust on the original, if not in the illustration,
B]. Furthercomparison between the two pieces enables us to add one more to the list of medals
confirms the impression that they are connected signed by Leone Leoni. This signature has not
in origin. We may note as something probably been noticed before, probably because the speci-
not due to mere fashion that the two men mens which have been described by various
wear their caps so that their ears (and writers6are more or less poor casts. The specimen
what ears i) project ungracefully. In nearly all at Florence is certainlycast, and so is the one here
other medals of the time the cap is not worn so illustrated, but the original (as the mark of the
low as to allow of this, or at any rate the ear is edge of the die on the reverse shows) was struck
partly concealed under it. Sperandio's medal of from dies.
Galeazzo Marescotti is an exception, but not so Salvaro has enlightened us as to the personality
striking as these two. Another characteristic of of Francesco di Fermo Fermi, whose family
the two pieces is the clumsy rendering of the belonged to Bardolino on the left bank of the
muscles of the neck, like great weals. Finally Lago di Garda, where a well-head, dated 1541,
there is the lettering. Both show the round E, bears his name. But as to the device of the
the Roselli medal once, the Cepola medal twice. reverse some uncertainty still remains. That it is
Both have the B with the bottom loop much a flowering plant in a casket, as Salvaro suggests,
larger than the upper, and the v with the left is certainly not the case. Armand's description :
hand stroke vertical instead of equally slanting "un coffret d'oAi sort une bague entour6e de
with its fellow.3 But details like these are only flammes" is much nearerthe mark, if indeed it is
of value in confirming the truth of the general not wholly right. The only doubt is whether it is
impression. a long-leaved plant or flames by which the ring is
Bartolommeo Cepola was a distinguished jurist surrounded. On a medal of Rinaldo d'Este,l in
of Veronese origin. Previous descriptions of the the manner of Coradini, we find the device of a
medal' ignore the somewhat curiously shaped diamond ring entwined by the leaves of a plant.
letter which begins the second half of the inscrip- But here the treatment certainly suggests tongues
tion; though so different from the letter which of flame. As the diamond in the ring, the symbol
follows, it can hardly be anything but a V. We of durability,8alludes to the man's name Firmus,
may interpret V(eronensis) V(triusque) I(uris) so possibly the flames which lick the gold ring
D(octor) A(dvocatus) C(onsistorialis). The are to be explained as the test of purity. The
explanation of the last two letters is given us by inscription "sic homo operibus", where "is
the title-page of the Louvain edition of Cepola's revealed" is presumablyto be understood (with a
" Consilia " of 1486. Cepola was educated at reference to I Cor., 3, 13), is quite in keeping.?
Bologna, where he took his Doctor's degree in On the side of the casket is another detail which
1446, and eventually held a Professorshipat Padua. Salvaro has doubtfully recognized as a coat of
There he distinguished himself, as the rival of arms. It is undoubtedly meant to represent the
AlessandroTartagniand Giovanni da Prato, by his arms of the man's family, which are az.,a crescent
arrogantand quarrelsomemanner. His fame was arg. between three stars of five rays or.
at its height about 1466, when he was summoned
to Rome and made an advocate of the Sacred Con- TWO WAX MODELS FOR MEDALS
sistory. He returned to Padua, where he died in Wax models for Italian medals of the i6th
1477.5 Now Bellano was occupied at Padua from century are sufficientlyrare to make it worth while
1469 onwards with the monument of Roselli (it 'Armand, 11, 177, 2 (from the Heiss 32 mm.). J. C.
was about the same time, doubtless, that he made Robinson Catalogue, No. 16o (32 mm.). Coll., Supino, Medagliere
the medal of that "monarcha sapientiae") and Mediceo, No. 802 (30 mm.). V. Salvaro,MedaglisticaVeronese
(Milan, 19o8), pp. 9 ff. (in his own collection, 30 mm.). Salvaro
other works; he seems to have gone on to Venice adds a bibliographyof earlierpublications. The BritishMuseum
in or before 1472. The medal of Cepola,therefore, specimen measures32 mrm.
could well have been cast during this period. It 7Armand,I, 54, 3.
'So, I think, we may explain it. Paolo Giovio, it is true,was
does no credit to Bellano, if it is really his, but unable to guess the significanceof the three interlaceddiamond
on the other hand it is not much worse than many rings which formed the impresa of Cosimo Vecchio, and says
of the works of that uncouth craftsman,. that Pope ClementVII was equallyin doubt about it (Dialogo
dell' Imprese, 1555, P. 42). But the diamond itself is the symbol
SIn the Roselli medal the ordinary v also occurs on the of indomitableresistanceto fire and hammer(ibid., p,
reverse. SSIcVTAVRVM IGNIand a crucible containing bars44).
of gold
3, 7 ; Trds. de Num., II, XLI,1.
45Armand, II, 73, formed the impresadevised by Lodovico Domenichi (Ragiona.
These biographicaldetails are from N. C. Papadopoll'sHist. mento,ed, 1574,P. 260) for Albertoda Stipicciano,to symbolize
GymnasiiPatavini (1726)1, pp. 224 f. his inviolableloyalty towards his master,the Duke of Florence.
212
Notes on Italian Medals
to record the addition of two others to the known The subject of wax models gives me an oppor-
stock, albeit they belong not to the best period. tunity of acknowledging the correction's of an
Both are in Mr. T. W. Greene's possession. The error into which I, in common with other writers
earlier [PLATE, D] shows the design by Michele on the subject of Italian medals, have fallen. It
Mazzafirrifor the reverseof a medal of Fernando I is very doubtful that, as we had supposed, the
de' Medici,the third Grand-Dukeof Tuscany, with process of casting la cire perdue was ever used
a group of Hercules and Nessus on a pedestal,and by the medallists. The models must have been
the motto SICITVR AD ASTRA. It is modelled in made on a disc of slate or wood, either the two
whitish wax on black slate, and is in excellent sides separately,or both on one disc. From these
condition, only the club of Hercules, a small piece the two sides of the mould were made separately,
on the left side of the Centaur,and two of the removed from the models, and joined together in
letters of the inscription being damaged. This the usual way; the seams in the metal representing
reverse appears to have been made in 1588; at the join are not infrequentlypresent in the finished
least, that is the date on the obverse to which it is medal, when the edge has not been filed. To
found attached.10 make a model of a two-sided medal in one piece,
In even better condition is the other model, by without the support of a disc, would have been
an unidentifiedartist,for a medal of Sigismund III practically impossible, without spoiling one side
of Poland [PLATE, F]. The medal itself has while the other was being modelled; but such a
alreadybeen describedby Raczynskiand Armand," disc provided a flat background and a support on
but evidently from an imperfect specimen. A which the lettering could be worked with com-
comparativelypoor example in the British Museum parative ease. It also, as Baron de Cosson points
(diameter 62'5 mm.) shows, like the model, the out to me, made it easy to provide a border when
faint inscription below the bust. a borderwas required,for the disc could be turned
Since Sigismund&T'SV-'XXXII
was born in r566, the medal in a lathe; and this was probably the origin of
dates from 1597-8. That it is the work of an most of the medals with moulded borders,such as
Italian artist is evident, but whether it was made those (to mention only specimens previouslyillus-
in Sweden or in Poland I cannot say. tratedin these pages) of Andrea Gritti by Giovanni
This model, which shows both sides of the Falier,"and of Antonio de Sanctamaria,Girolamo
piece, is wrought in bright red wax on the two Callagrani,Catelano Casali by Lysippus,as well as
sides of a plate of black slate. The slight damage Lysippus'sportraitof himself.15This method was,
to the top of the P in POLONIAEand other small of course, quite distinct from that employed by
flaws are reproduced in the British Museumspeci- certain medallists,accustomed to engrave in metal,
men of the medal, showing that casts were made who cut the inscription on a separate ring and
from the model after it had been thus damaged. placed it round the model when impressing it in
The reverse shows a well-known type-Religion the mould.'6
holding a chalice and pointing to heaven, with the Katalog, Parpart, &c., 1913, lot 336); but I find it difficult to
motto DVM SPIRITVS HOS REGET ARTVS. It should accept so late a date, and its connexion with the medalsof the
be compared with the reverse of the medal of school of Cellini still seems to me to be very probable.
1"Due to Dr. Menadier, Zeitschr.fAr Num., xxx, p. 314.
Pietro Piantanida; 12 it is evidently inspired by "Burlington Magazine, Dec., i907, p. 149, P1. IV, 3.
some earlier medal of this kind. 5"Ibid.,Aug., I9o8,P1. I and II.
10 Armand, I, 284, 8.
8eInstancesof this, proved by the shifting of the inscription
" Armand, II1, 307 D (diam. 60 mm.). ring in relationto the type, are given from the work of Amadeo
da Milano in TheBurlingtonMagazine,Jan., Igog9,p. 216,and
"2Burlington Magazine, Oct. I9Io, p. 19, and Pl. II, B, Recently from the medals of Paul II in The NumismaticChronicle,igio,
Dr. Reglinghas assignedthis medal toAntonioAbondio(Lepke's p. 368.

THE "ELISABETH BAS" PORTRAIT AGAIN


BY ABRAHAM BREDIUS
S a few-and some well-known-con. (Bartsch,No 5), nous montre sa predilection pour les plis
noisseurs seem to retain their belief larges qui nous frappe si fortementdans la representation
in the old attributionsof this portrait d' Elisabeth Bas, et, chose qu'on cherchera en vain dans
les portraits de Rembrandt datant de cette epoque, la
to Rembrandt,I think it useful to give mani.re dont Bol recouvrele dossieret les bras du fauteuil
here two new proofs of my accuracy par les plis du velement. On sent deja dans ce d6tailles
in attributing it to Ferdinand Bol. In an in- exagerations aux quelles Bol recourraplus tard dans les
grandes compositions destinees au nouvel hbtel de ville,
terestingarticle on this subject, M. C. G. 't Hooft,' ainsi que dans ses portraits de parade , . . Or on retrouve
the Director of the Museum Fodor, who entirely ces plis dansle portraitde Meulenaerde 1650 (RyksMuseum)
shares my opinion, gives another proof for the danscelui dela vieille damede l'Ermitage,datede 1651,dans
le portraitde Quellinuset dans maintsautres.
authorship of Bol. He says :
L'eau-forte de Bol, Philosophe en meditation. 1642 The Hermitage picture,reproduced here next to
'La Revuede l'Art ancien et moderne,June, g9xz, Madame Bas [PLATE I, A & B] and paintedmore
217

You might also like