Professional Documents
Culture Documents
High
Low
Honor
Dishonor
This process provides the missing link in the procedure we need to state a claim, whether
the claim is to collect on a monetary debt or to exact some sort of performance, from our
opponents. For years, we have gone into courts, kicking and screaming, for a remedy
against those who would take our hard-earned money, or attempt to compel us into
performing an alleged duty. The courts could not hear us, because we had no commercial
energy to take any action, let alone ‘bring’ an action into their court. Our commercial
energy was given over to our opponent, when we drafted him, or re-drafted him. He
remained silent ninety-nine percent of the time, or came back with argument (which
usually began with the statement, “We will not respond to your unfounded statements...”
then was followed by two pages of case cites to show you where you were found wrong in
other courts!), both of which are dishonor. But we never realized HOW to get back the
commercial energy the opponent retained by arguing or remaining silent.
1
Now, we have figured out that the missing step was to go to protest, i.e., to have a neutral
third party object (protest) the other party’s keeping the ball, preventing us from scoring.
The judges must have loved it when we plunked down $350 for an appeal, or a writ, or a
replevin action, or whatever we did trying to get remedy, because we were just throwing
good money after bad. Without the ability to proceed, we were wasting our time. Now,
however, we know that protest is evidence of the dishonor of the other party, which
reverses the high/low, or honor/dishonor positions. Think about it. It’s what they’ve been
doing to us, without calling it that, so as to not let the cat out of the bag. Now we know why
the prosecutor never shows up in a traffic case. You were in dishonor 72-hours after
getting the ‘ticket’, if you remained silent to the citation the traffic cop issued until the day
you were told to show up. The court took silent notice of your dishonor, let the witness who
saw your violation tell the story, then ruled against you, no matter what you said because
you had no power to say it after the dishonor.
Doesn’t the story of the Supreme Court ruling regarding the cop in Texas taking the
woman to jail on a seat-belt violation, say it all? The court ruled that, notwithstanding the
Texas statute that prohibits cops from taking you to jail on an infraction, the cop did
nothing wrong. If you read the ruling with the understanding that the cop DID NOT take
her to jail on the statute, or in violation of the statute, but on her dishonor - she argued
with him at the scene, remember? - you can see that the honor/dishonor procedure is right
on point!
Notice that going low first, making the opponent high, gives him the commercial energy to
carry out your draft. You may want him to pay you, or to cease and desist, or to produce
proof of claim. If you did your conditional acceptances and negative averments correctly,
he is probably going to dishonor you, unless he decides to roll over and carry out your
draft. This way, you will have achieved the agreement of the parties before coming into the
court, so the substance is not at issue any longer, and the court is reduced to a ministerial
duty - based on the evidence before it, which is that the only claim on the table is the claim
of the notary who tried to get acceptance on the draft, and certifies that the dishonor of the
opponent was deliberate! Remember, there are only four ways to respond to a draft: (1)
accept and carry out - the IRS says “You owe $20 million”, so you pay it; (2) conditionally
accept and re-draft, with the CA4V and the negative averment, which says “Sure, I’ll pay
you, upon proof of claim!; (3) argue - who are you, what’s your authority, I don’t owe that
much, or whatever; and (4) remain silent.
If they have been relying on us either arguing or remaining silent, and going to protest
behind our backs, (which is probably what the ‘arraignment’ is, but if they told us, they’d
let the cat out of the bag), then turning the tables is going to prove to be a lot of fun! You
simply protest their arguments or their silence, and there is no controversy regarding
substance any longer. And who says so? You? Nope. The neutral third party, officer-of-
the-court! And his testimony is worth that of two other men. So, now you’re before the
court with your notary and his evidence. The judge has an administrative, not judicial,
issue. This means it is strictly procedural, where NO DISCRETION IS ALLOWED.
Remember, a judge, when acting judicially has immunity. And why is that? Because he’s
at risk when he has to decide between two ‘presumptions’ - yours and your opponents, and
God help him if he chooses the ‘wrong’ one because neither of you ESTABLISHED the
matter before you got there. So, he wants protection and the legislature gave it to him.
2
You’d want it too, if you couldn’t tell which guy was lying. But, if you go low to your
opponent, giving him the opportunity to produce his claim and he doesn’t do it, where is
the controversy? Substance issue is over. Down and out! Now the judge gets to rule
administratively, ministerially, where there is no immunity. Do you think he wants to risk
his career? It matters not, because protest isn’t limited to substance and your opponent.
This ‘going low’ to become high also is important in procedure. You go low to give the
court the power (commercial energy) to help you make your claim. So much for the
argument “Don’t give them jurisdiction”. You may still be stuck in the fog about what
jurisdiction really means. From Ezekiel 44, God told the Israelites that He would give
them the kind of judges/priests they deserved. That meant that if the people followed the
law, they would get the Sons of Zadok as judges. If the people disobeyed the law, God
would see to it they would get the profane priests, the Levite priests - a case of the profane
getting the profane judges they deserved, and be treated with profanity! If you remain
honorable, that is, conditionally accept and re-draft, without arguing, without remaining
silent, you have shown the court you are honorable, and the judge will put on the ‘hat’ of
the Sons of Zadok priest. This doesn’t mean that he will immediately roll over for you,
because he must test you to make sure you are not an imposter. And, he must test you
three times, to make sure you actually know what you are doing, and are doing it
deliberately, and didn’t just get ‘lucky’. But, you will have convinced him you are a child
of God, honorable, deserving of being treated with honor, instead of with profanity, as
traitor, or 14th amendment ‘citizen’ must be treated.
You will also see the importance of going low to become high if you find a judge who does
not understand the procedure, or, who just wants to make sure you know what to do next.
In the past, one of the remedies we sought when we knew we were right, was the petition
for a Writ of Mandamus. It was great, as far as it went. However, without realizing the
high/low, honor/dishonor procedure in play (they don’t call them State actors for
nothing!), we were denied, without comment. Now we realize that asking the higher court
to command the lower court to grant us a particular ‘remedy’ was to request the
impossible. How could the higher court command the lower court, who, by protest, was
proven to be in dishonor, when a party in dishonor has no commercial energy to carry out
any command? If, on the other hand, however, we asked the higher court to grant the
petition for a writ of mandamus, or in the alternative, a writ of prohibition, we’d get what
we want, because the prohibition is the opposite side of the same coin! EXAMPLE: If you
ask the higher court to command the lower court to release your property, or in the
alternative, to prohibit them from retaining your property, which part of the order aren’t
you going to get? Get it?
So, you can use the protest to protest substance, in dealing with your opponent, so that you
win the case before you get into the court, and your only claim is “This neutral 3rd party
has evidence that the opponent is in dishonor”, leaving the judge with his mouth shut. And,
you can use the protest to insure that procedure is correct, by ruling on nothing but the
evidence before the court. This makes it a ministerial duty, since your opponent will not
likely be able to show your notary ‘did it wrong’, and failing to perform a ministerial duty
subjects the court to the petition for the writ of mandamus/prohibition.
3
STEPS TO PROTEST
A. BEFORE REQUESTING THE PROTEST
1. Take the responsibility of supplying the notary with all the envelopes, stamps, and
Certificate of Mailing postage he or she will need to do ALL THREE STEPS, along with
labels bearing the addresses of the recipients of your papers, so gather these first. The
labels will be used on the envelopes and the Certificates of Mailing (CoM), or Certificate
of Service (COS) and the Notary is not your personal secretary. You may address the
envelopes and the CoM’ s yourself.
2. Make sure your draft* is in the file you will take to the Notary, along with a copy of it
for each recipient, AND the proof of service, be it (a) Certificate of Mailing, (b) green
RRR’s (Return Receipt Requested cards), or (c) a certificate of service signed by a friend
attesting that he or she mailed the draft. * = administrative judgment, re-draft
Conditional Acceptance for value (CA4V), etc.
3. Have the Notice of Dishonor (NOD) AND the Notice of Protest ( NOP) BOTH prepared
with all the blanks filled in except the information the notary puts on the paper. NOTE:
If you have already done a notice of dishonor, by a different name, have a copy of the
NOTICE authorizing proceeding to the next step, included, then omit taking copies of the
draft to the Notary, as the NOTICE will substitute for the copy of the document.
4
8. He or she uses the same procedure as in Step One, sending the Protest Notice which
corresponds to the draft, to each recipient, marking the date the response is due.
NOTE: Documents you may find in public handbooks or books written by attorneys, which
claim to be notices of protest for financial institutions or marine protests, are not sufficient
as is, for most people ‘outside’ the system.
NOTICE OF DISHONOR
5
14. Evidence of the non-acceptance of (draft name) Conditional Acceptance posted on
(date) AD2004, addressed to
15. requesting proof of claim, appears in the record, as silence by the recipient(s).
Notice is hereby given that the draft herein named has been dishonored, and no reason
provided, by the drawee or other party(ies) who can be compelled to perform or pay the
instrument, subjects the drawee’s failure to accept, perform/pay the instrument timely, to
formal protest.
DATED: the day of the month, in the year of our Lord, Two
thousand and one, [ , AD2004] near (County)
republic.
________________________________________SEAL
Notary Public
My commission expires on:
************************************************************************
PROTEST NOTICE
TO:
Please take Notice that on the day of the the month , AD2004, before me,
, Notary Public for County, personally appeared
(Your name here), Secured Party/Creditor of the ship or vessel known as
(STRAWMAN’S NAME HERE), registered in STATE OF , SECRETARY
OF STATE’S OFFICE a financing statement, # dated , AD
and declared that on the day of the month, AD , said
vessel/transmitting utility was attacked and damaged by fraudulent, and henceforth
unsubstantiated claims and breach of fiduciary duty, by public vessels named
, and having experienced the failure of producing any claim, or ceasing and desisting the seizure of
private property entrusted to fiduciary, committed a dishonor of a demand for restitution tendered
the Day of the Month , Of the year of our Lord, AD ,
hereby enters this Note of Protest, to serve and avail him hereafter, if found necessary, upon
looking to you for payment, in order that you may now be looked upon for liability for damages, of
which you hereby have notice.
{seal}
Notary Public
******************************************************
CERTIFICATE OF PROTEST
6
STATE OF )
) ss.:
COUNTY OF )
Be it known, that on the Day of the Month, in the year of our
Lord, Two thousand and two, at the request of (your name here) ,
of , , I, ,
a notary public in and for the State of , duly appointed, commissioned and sworn,
residing in the City of , County of ,
and State aforesaid, presented the annexed draft of (your name here) ,
for certificate of proof of claim or cease and desist, at the drawee(s)
and demanded performance thereof which was refused for the following reason:
.
Whereupon, I, the said notary public, at the request of the aforesaid did protest, and by
these presents do solemnly protest against the drawee, beneficiaries, and all parties whom
it may concern, for exchange, re-exchange, and all costs, damages, and interest already
incurred, or hereafter incurred, by reason of the non-acceptance thereof. And I, the said
notary do hereby certify, that on the same day and year above written, I deposited,
postage-paid in the post office at , ,
, written notices of the dishonor of the said instrument, signed
by me, addressed to the drawees and beneficiaries thereof, directed to the parties to be
charged, as follows:
[Each of the above named places being the known place of residence or employment of the
persons to whom the said notice was directed respectively.]
Please contact me at 916-391-1576 to verify any & all documents before you
send them, my mailing address is:
Peter Dorsett
5960 South Land Park Dr. #213
Sacramento, California 95822
9
Fax: 775-890-7856
I charge $100.00 Federal Reserve Notes in advance (or money order or check
made out to Peter Dorsett) for each entity named at one location. If more than
one location is required than a separate Notary Protest is required.
I send the entity in question original blue inked signed & notarized documents
with my tracking numbers assigned. I also send back to you when the process
is complete the same blue inked originals and I keep one copy as the official
record keeper. When you send me your documents, I will need two copies of
all of your documents. One goes back to the entity and I keep one copy for my
records. The more evidence you provide me, the stronger your case becomes.
This includes such things as copies of how you delivered your documents, i.e.
USPS mail receipts & green cards if you sent via this method...or affidavit of
service if you hand delivered the documents. By including as much in the way
of how you delivered your documents and with affidavits, you build a very
strong case.
In lieu of not being in my presence, I have included a sample of an affidavit in
support of a Notary Protest that you would fill out with your pertinent
information, go before a local notary, have them notarize it and include this in
your documents that you send to me.
Please contact me before you send the documents so that I can ensure that you
are not delayed in your process by not including certain documents on your
part.
Thank you for your inquiry,
Peter Dorsett
Peter@theinfowizard.net
(Your) County )
)SS.
(Your State goes here) )
10
I, (your name goes here), hereinafter Affiant, having first hand knowledge of the facts
stated herein, being competent to make these statements, do hereby state the following
facts: To wit,
1. Affiant received a commercial presentment, also known as, (State the nature of the
presentment here along with the address of the entity that is making the claim against
you), hereinafter Presenters.
2. Affiant prepared a Conditional Acceptance For Value, which was served on
(Presenters-state here who you are making this conditional acceptance to...) at
(Presenters address) (their address goes here) via registered mail #s (the USPS mail
receipt goes here or FEDEX or however you sent the presentment) posted (the date
you mailed it goes here).
3. Affiant is in receipt of a (green card, PS Form 3811...if this is how you sent it out),
signed by Presenters Agent, dated (Whatever date that you received it back from the
USPS), acknowledging receipt of registered mail (USPS mail tracking number goes
here). (See photocopy, Attachment 1)[If you are using FEDEX or UPS, so designate it
here with their tracking number].
4. Response to Conditional Acceptance For Value of Affiant through (the date that you
sent out your conditional Acceptance) 2004 is silence.
Affiant declares the above facts to be true, correct and complete to the best of his (/her if
two of you are filing) knowledge and belief and hereby submits the Affidavit knowing the
penalty of bearing false witness before God and Man and under penalty of perjury under
the law of (your state goes here).
Submitted this (whatever day you appear in front of your local notary) of the
Month, AD___________2004
________________________________
(Your name printed here)
__________________________
(Your Signature)
JURAT/ACKNOWLEDGMENT
(Your) - state )
on the land )
and beyond the sea )
11
On this _____day of _____________AD 2004 Signor did personally appear before me, is
known to be the person operating in the requisite capacity for signature described herein,
who executed the foregoing, acknowledged the contents thereof; and executed the same as
his free act and deed. Subscribed and agreed to before the undersigned.
Seal/Stamp
________________________
Notary Signature
___________________________
Printed name of Notary
My commission expires:
12