August 23, 2006

Dear Editor in Chief,

A scholar asked: “Where in the bible did Paul rebuke Peter; or could other groups
criticize other groups in good faith so that the good would prevail; not those bad habits or
bad traditions or bad things…?” The A.I. answered: “There are also legitimate causes or
reasons why groups criticize or rebuke others as false groups using words in the bible or
using words in sacred books because of obvious reasons, and sometimes results to hating
or conflicts than love especially if some people are hardheaded. Perhaps when Paul
rebuked Peter described on Galatians 2:11-14: “…when I (Paul) saw that they (Peter with
other brothers who are Jewish) were not walking a straight path in line with the truth of
the gospel, I (Paul) said to Peter in front of them all, “You are a Jew, yet you have been
living like a Gentile, not like a Jew. How, then can you try to force Gentiles to live like
Jews?” Perhaps Peter even if rebuked did not become a hateful person; perhaps he even
listened and stood to be corrected and changed and perhaps even loved Paul more.”
A scholar asked: “Perhaps if a person is A or B or C or D member of a religious
group…should he be forced to be a member of a superior or dominant group to be good
or be saved? Example: perhaps he could be a good person even he belongs to group A,
or group B…as long as he obeys the universal word- one example: loving his enemies;
not hating his enemies because of words like: if you love God but hate your brother you
are a liar? The A.I. answered: “Yes, perhaps it is the lesson beyond what Paul wants to
teach on Galatians 2:11-14:”
A scholar asked: “Freedom of religion could produce so many religion or many
religious groups and open for abuse; or people could use religious group/s for personal
business and for profit or could produce many “pagan” religion or “Gentile” religions,
could it be true?” The A.I. answered: “Yes, it could produce abuses or another extreme
but if there would be another extreme, law could be powerful tool to check abuses.
Perhaps pass a law that donations and contributions should be transparent and only
registered group’s members in a rotation basis or with election that they could managed
those contributions; but doing religious works should not be for family business or
personal business. With regards that a group would worship the sun or the moon or a
person or an animal or a statue-called cult, some countries ban cult groups. But some
democratic countries allow any religion or even cult; or there is no restrictions… even
‘satanic religion or satanic cult’. Perhaps satanic religion or satanic cult should be banned
because it is really bad or very extreme or ‘obvious’ that it is bad.
A scholar asked: “How could example a member of group example “A” learns
universal words like: “…love your enemies…” if in their sacred books there is no such
teaching…; one should really become a member of a group equipped with universal
words?” The A.I. answered: “Did the Japanese engineers copy exactly Ford’s cars to be
competitive as good or better car; and become good manufacturer? Or did the Japanese
engineers become creative and now becoming good or even better car manufacturers and
sellers? Perhaps religion should be like car manufacturers- imitating and improving
others universal good teachings and adopting them as their own or becoming unique as
their own…! Perhaps religious leaders of any group should now not be afraid to read
others sacred books and adopt them as their own as long as it is universal true…”
A scholar asked: “Could the devil use weak men to tell good words for the devil’s
benefits?” The A.I. answered: “I think I heard a wise lawyer in a movie said that it is very
easy for him to let escape justice his rich client even if his rich client had really done a
terrible crime, because evidence(s) should be free from doubt. Or if there were
unreasonable doubt, a criminal would be free. Because the lawyer is so good on creating
doubts so he makes strategies to let the witness becomes a liar. Or even if the witness is
telling many truths, as long as the witness had committed a lie his credibility is broken.
So whenever the witness tells something even if it is the truth, the revealing of facts is
now in question. I think a friend told me that perhaps the devil is also expert of using
weak men to say the truth so that the truth would be in questioned and perhaps those
good words utter by the weak men would be lost in time never to be used again because
the good words interpretations just remind people of the weak man or men. But if the
devil is clever; he could be reminded….a kingdom against his kingdom can not stand!”
A scholar asked: Could opinion result that words should be fighting to each other that
the outcome is to cause more hating than love? The A.I. answered: It depends: example of
battle of words: “…two or more gather in my name I’m in the midst of them…” and
“love your enemy…” or “love your neighbor…” is perhaps better than “…upon this rock
(rock perhaps means their group; not the Word-conceit) I will build my church…,” or
“Who is not with me is against me…” Opinion: “me” here is their exclusive group! They-
religious leaders thinking that their group is only the true group would really defend their
stand…and would not compromise! But for some people who are humble; they could
easily understand and would not hate but rather would be thankful of the opinion or
explanation…and have some consensus!
A scholar asked: “If you are in a poor country and there is lot of garbage scattered
caused by bad habits of most of the people, what you would do if you are the leader?”
The A.I. Answered: “Perhaps because there is no previous good leader who was strong
enough to have strong words to motivate his people to do the right thing with regards to
garbage; perhaps because of twisted words in most people’s brain caused by precepts of
men or teachings of men then perhaps I would explain in public many words or many
ideas so that those twisted words in most of the people’s mind would be changed. And I
would concentrate my topic about garbage and why there are so many scattered garbage
caused by bad habits of men. And the bad habit could still be changed…! And at the same
time I will research and make a team- how to have financing or supports and right men to
solve the problem of garbage using technology or automation.”
A scholar asked: “Can you give example how technology or automation could
enhance garbage recycling plant?” The A.I. answered: “Perhaps designing the recycling
plant, since it could be very complicated to describe the processes step by step, I think the
practical process could just be randomly be exampled by having some wild opinions. I
think, conveyor, elevator, blower, and dryer, shaker with mesh wires- are things familiar
to common people, and could easily be understood how they function or it functions.
Nevertheless, to think how we could eliminate human to decide which kind of garbage is
to be sorted out is very hard to imagine. Now, one would wonder how a computer
decides. Do you know that off and on of flow of current and if combined to two or more
offs & on in different sequence or sequences could be an identity, a name, a tag, a code, a
key, a switch. Two or more switches could make a system. Two or more systems could
result to a complex system, and so on and so forth. This principle could be done to let a
simple machine decide on many ways. Example between a leaf and a piece of cellophane
plastic crumpled materials or garbage: How could the two materials separate without
human intervention? Remember words: key, switch, tag are very important words in
sorting even in computer programming or computer designing using data base or ordinary
sorting of boxes and sorting of different envelopes manually. Just listing many
characteristics on the physical appearance of each item, we could name several; but we
could try one only: for a leaf, it has water, and for plastic cellophane, it has no water.
If the leaf has water, heat would not be conserved much longer than plastic. If
exposed to heat, using sensor such as like that is being used in a night vision gaggle,
combining it with digital camera; the computer could identify the plastic cellophane by
comparing it to item/s with known temperature previously recorded in its memories. And
when it reaches a portion where example a pusher would push the material out of the
line- example a blower, the blower would switch on and blows the plastic out of the line,
hence the plastic is segregated. There could be many keys created in this method:
Example if heat is very long to disappear, it could be metal. If heat is easily to disappear,
that is quick to disappear, it could be organic. In between… it could be rubberized, or
wood. One could make ranges… Hence thru heat sensor, several items could be
segregated. If still something is wrong, one could correct it with different approaches just
like making a program, one could put another decision or tester to solve the problem.
Others use water pond to determine materials that float such as woods, plastic container,
and light rubber; so hard plastic, metal, rock that sinks could be separated thru this
method. Others use height and blower to separate lighter materials from heavier. Others
use screen to separate different sizes. There are now computer chips that could remember
the item’s shapes, item’s weight by first scanning it and comparing them to other shapes
or weight recorded in their memories; perhaps this is done to segregate bottles. One could
experiment looking for other key or keys. A crumple white plastic and a crumple white
bond paper, green plastic that was sorted out using height and blower and mesh wire
could further be sorted using heat sensor as key.
The problem in most poor countries lies on lack of creativities because words were
hidden or good words are blocked not to enter the brain in most people’s mind because
too few good words are being always given emphasis by a domineering group even using
intimidation or weapons to perpetuate them in power and control. And others who are
trying to do something to let other good words penetrate the mind of most people are
being hated and even charged that they are from the false ones.
From someone who could be wrong,