Welcome to Scribd, the world's digital library. Read, publish, and share books and documents. See more
P. 1
Cellulosic Ethanol Aff - Symonds

Cellulosic Ethanol Aff - Symonds

Ratings:

5.0

(1)
|Views: 237 |Likes:
Published by AffNeg.Com

More info:

Published by: AffNeg.Com on Jan 08, 2009
Copyright:Attribution Non-commercial

Availability:

Read on Scribd mobile: iPhone, iPad and Android.
download as DOC or read online from Scribd
See more
See less

10/16/2011

 
Gonzaga Debate Institute 2008
1
Lacy/Symonds/Bowen
Cellulosic Ethanol Aff 
Cellulosic Ethanol Aff 
Cellulosic Ethanol Aff.....................................................................................................................................................1Plan..................................................................................................................................................................................2IAC--Contention ___ Solvency 1/3................................................................................................................................3## Inherency ##...............................................................................................................................................................6T: Substantial...................................................................................................................................................................7Inherency: Current Incentives Fail 1/5............................................................................................................................8## Solvency ##..............................................................................................................................................................13USFG Key 1/2...............................................................................................................................................................14Incentives Solve 1/3......................................................................................................................................................16R&D Solves 1/4............................................................................................................................................................19Automaker Incentives Solve.........................................................................................................................................23Insurance Solves...........................................................................................................................................................24Loan Guarantees Solve.................................................................................................................................................25AT “Only Theory/Not Viable” 1/2................................................................................................................................26AT “Enzyme Cost”........................................................................................................................................................28AT “Energy Negative” 1/6............................................................................................................................................30AT “No Refineries”.......................................................................................................................................................36AT “No Cars”................................................................................................................................................................37AT “Water”....................................................................................................................................................................38## Advantages ##..........................................................................................................................................................39Clean Development.......................................................................................................................................................40Economy.......................................................................................................................................................................41Hydrogen.......................................................................................................................................................................42Landfills........................................................................................................................................................................43Gulf Dead Zones 1/2.....................................................................................................................................................44Oil Dependence 1/5.......................................................................................................................................................46Oil Dependence 2/5.......................................................................................................................................................47Oil Dependence 3/5.......................................................................................................................................................48Oil Dependence 4/5.......................................................................................................................................................49Oil Dependence 5/5.......................................................................................................................................................50Pump Prices...................................................................................................................................................................51Small Farms..................................................................................................................................................................52Soil Erosion...................................................................................................................................................................53Trade Deficit.................................................................................................................................................................54Trade Wars 1/2..............................................................................................................................................................55Warming 1/5..................................................................................................................................................................57Warming: Carbon Sequestration...................................................................................................................................62## Disadvantage Answers ##........................................................................................................................................63 NU: Government Signals Now 1/3...............................................................................................................................64AT “Backstopping”.......................................................................................................................................................67AT “Brazil”....................................................................................................................................................................68AT “Corn Ethanol Bad” 1/3..........................................................................................................................................69AT “Deforestation”........................................................................................................................................................75AT “Food Prices” 1/2....................................................................................................................................................76AT “Food Prices”--Link Turn........................................................................................................................................79AT “Food Prices” – No Link 1/3...................................................................................................................................80At “Food Prices” – Corn Trade-Off..............................................................................................................................83AT “Food Prices” – Not Unique....................................................................................................................................84High Food Prices Good.................................................................................................................................................85AT “Monoculture”.........................................................................................................................................................86AT “Spending”..............................................................................................................................................................87AT “CP: Renewable Fuel Standard”.............................................................................................................................88
 
Gonzaga Debate Institute 2008
2
Lacy/Symonds/Bowen
Cellulosic Ethanol Aff 
Plan
[Draft]The United States federal government should substantially increase research & development, demonstration projectsand commercialization incentives for cellulosic ethanol in the United States
 
Gonzaga Debate Institute 2008
3
Lacy/Symonds/Bowen
Cellulosic Ethanol Aff 
IAC--Contention ___ Solvency 1/3
[Insert Peak Oil advantage from the Oil Toolkit !!!]Current incentives for fellulosic ethanol are too smallSpace Daily 2008
[June 6, lexis]Today Congress overrode the Presidents veto of the Food, Conservation and Energy Act of 2008, also knownas the Farm Bill. The new legislation includes a significant clean energy development component --improved and new programs for wind power, advanced biofuels, energy efficiency, solar power and newenergy crops for cleaner energy from Americas farmers, ranchers and rural businesses.We thank the Agriculture Committee leadership for their support of a stronger Energy Title in the face of anextremely difficult budget environment, said Howard Learner, Executive Director of the Environmental Lawand Policy Center. These programs are good for all Americans -- they are a win-win-win for our energysecurity, environment, and economy.The new Energy Title received $1.04 billion in mandatory appropriations in the 2008 Farm Bill.
The FarmBill
also
includes $348 million in new tax credits to spur production of 
advanced
cellulosic biofuels
tohelp cut our nations dependence on imported oil. While
the Farm Bills overall funding falls short of need
,it is a good start towards addressing pressing national energy concerns.The improved and new clean energy programs in the Energy Title include:+ Rural Energy for America Program (REAP). REAP funding has been more than doubled and improves theFarm Bills successful Section 9006 clean energy development program for locally-owned wind power,energy efficiency, solar energy, and other clean energy projects ($255 million over four years).+ For the first time, REAP now includes Energy Technical Assistance funding to help farmers save money,improve margins and reduce fuel use.+ Biorefinery Assistance. Grants and loan guarantees to help build advanced biorefineries; critical to jumpstart advanced biofuels production ($320 million).+ Biomass Crop Assistance Program (BCAP). A first-ever energy crop program to help encourage farmersto grow sustainable energy crops such as switchgrass ($70 million).+ Repowering Assistance. A new program, Rural Repowering, assists boilers at biofuels plants to burnenergy crops instead of coal, cutting pollution and creating new markets for energy crops ($35 million).+ Advanced Biofuels. Production incentives for advanced biofuels ($300 million).+ Biomass Research and Development. New investments for biomass fuel and power research anddevelopment ($118 million).The Energy Title will also improve the federal biobased markets procurement and biodiesel fuel education programs. The legislation also includes several other programs for which Congress could not provide fundingin the Farm Bill, such as a new program to curb fertilizer costs and fossil fuel burning by using wind andother renewable energy instead. Supporters of these programs now look to the Appropriations Committeesfor potential funding.The new Farm Bill also includes $348 million in new tax credits to help jumpstart environmentally preferable cellulosic ethanol production.America needs new domestic, sustainable energy. Leadership of the Senate Finance and House Ways andMeans Committees should be commended for providing these new clean energy incentives, said Andy Olsen,Senior Policy Advocate for ELPC.In all,
these new programs are a good start
, said John Moore, Senior Attorney for ELPC [theEnvironmental Law and Policy Center].
There is much more that can yet be done to help solve
rural
Americas energy challenges, and we urge Congress to strengthen these programs with additionalfunding in the coming years,
before the next Farm Bill.

Activity (2)

You've already reviewed this. Edit your review.
1 thousand reads
1 hundred reads

You're Reading a Free Preview

Download
/*********** DO NOT ALTER ANYTHING BELOW THIS LINE ! ************/ var s_code=s.t();if(s_code)document.write(s_code)//-->